|
On April 11 2012 16:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. I did read the thread, though I must admit I missed the ebwop as Toad's huge post drew my attention. Honestly Toad, WBG, VE, and you all look suspicious to me, and I'm highly surprised sputnik didn't flip red. You typed a significant scumslip as it's very likely that mafia would create such a list for use in their own quicktopic and when copypasting it, forget to change the "we". That's why I'm on your ass, the ebwop could just be an oh shit after rereading it or one of your scumbuddies pointing it out. I'll be looking at your filter more closely tonight.
okay, so if we all look suspicious to you, who looks the most suspicious? Who would you lynch out of myself, Toad, and VE? Why?
|
On April 11 2012 16:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. I did read the thread, though I must admit I missed the ebwop as Toad's huge post drew my attention. Honestly Toad, WBG, VE, and you all look suspicious to me, and I'm highly surprised sputnik didn't flip red. You typed a significant scumslip as it's very likely that mafia would create such a list for use in their own quicktopic and when copypasting it, forget to change the "we". That's why I'm on your ass, the ebwop could just be an oh shit after rereading it or one of your scumbuddies pointing it out. I'll be looking at your filter more closely tonight. okay, so if we all look suspicious to you, who looks the most suspicious? Who would you lynch out of myself, Toad, and VE? Why? I'll have to go through the filters again to give you an accurate read which I don't have time for right now as I've gotta head off to school in 10 minutes. VE's currently the one I find most suspicious and if it ends up being between you three I'd vote for him.
|
On April 11 2012 16:34 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. Oh for christs sake gonzaw. I'm the attention seeking hypno-Toad, don't sit in my spot! Seriously everyone doing a post that's not about YOUR case is some stupid bullshit because people are ignoring the important part in this thread according to you? You've got to be kidding me. I didn't even notice that beause it's so short above my massive wall of text and while you posted I obviosusly wasn't checking the thread but that DOES sound pretty hilarious after all :p
No, I think what I posted about VE is somewhat important, and people could very well comment if they agree with what I posted or not, instead of just saying "VE is scummy ##Vote: VE".
Also, I'm not too sure about wbg and I posted my reasons why. I'd appreciate it if someone would comment on it too so I can improve my read on wbg, and see what other people think of him.
On April 11 2012 16:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. I did read the thread, though I must admit I missed the ebwop as Toad's huge post drew my attention. Honestly Toad, WBG, VE, and you all look suspicious to me, and I'm highly surprised sputnik didn't flip red. You typed a significant scumslip as it's very likely that mafia would create such a list for use in their own quicktopic and when copypasting it, forget to change the "we". That's why I'm on your ass, the ebwop could just be an oh shit after rereading it or one of your scumbuddies pointing it out. I'll be looking at your filter more closely tonight.
Why are VE, Toad and wbg suspicious? Post your reasoning. And what do you think about other players? Who do you think is the most suspicious out of them? And ignore that, it's not a scumslip and you know it.
|
He makes a really good point about copy pasting from scum thread. Still not a car on its own, though.
|
Holy wall of text, Toad your posts are making my eyes bleed. That said, I find your reasoning against VE sound.
VE's reason for thinking toad is scum is non-existent, I mean look at it: Link
Yet he continues to fill the thread with noise about Toad being scum and never coming up with a real case to back it up.
##Vote: VisceraEyes
|
Ebwop: case not car. Posting from my phone sucks.
|
On April 11 2012 16:45 gonzaw wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:34 Toadesstern wrote:On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. Oh for christs sake gonzaw. I'm the attention seeking hypno-Toad, don't sit in my spot! Seriously everyone doing a post that's not about YOUR case is some stupid bullshit because people are ignoring the important part in this thread according to you? You've got to be kidding me. I didn't even notice that beause it's so short above my massive wall of text and while you posted I obviosusly wasn't checking the thread but that DOES sound pretty hilarious after all :p 1)No, I think what I posted about VE is somewhat important, and people could very well comment if they agree with what I posted or not, instead of just saying "VE is scummy ##Vote: VE". 2)Also, I'm not too sure about wbg and I posted my reasons why. I'd appreciate it if someone would comment on it too so I can improve my read on wbg, and see what other people think of him. Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. I did read the thread, though I must admit I missed the ebwop as Toad's huge post drew my attention. Honestly Toad, WBG, VE, and you all look suspicious to me, and I'm highly surprised sputnik didn't flip red. You typed a significant scumslip as it's very likely that mafia would create such a list for use in their own quicktopic and when copypasting it, forget to change the "we". That's why I'm on your ass, the ebwop could just be an oh shit after rereading it or one of your scumbuddies pointing it out. I'll be looking at your filter more closely tonight. 3)Why are VE, Toad and wbg suspicious? Post your reasoning. And what do you think about other players? Who do you think is the most suspicious out of them? And ignore that, it's not a scumslip and you know it.
This is gold. Keep on posting gonzaw, please.
1) why do you think your case is so important RIGHT NOW? To make sure people will say you've been on VE all along once he flipped because noone is going to vote the legendary VE aka your mafia buddy? 2) I don't think wbg should be a topic right now unless it has something to do with our lynch, because otherwise it's derailing the thread. 3) The first line might be an okayish question to ask although I am totally fine with people just agreeing with me and bugs. Or are you going to say that everyone who did not have a proper, own case on a mafia-flip has to be a mafia himself? I am pretty sure most cases are something like "a couple of people did the case, the rest read it, agreed and voted as well".
You are not asking artanis this question and noone else. Why are you not asking people like Katina that question? Why are you not asking Johnny who, as far as I can recall just said he thinks VE is town and I am mafia, now he says he agrees with what I said and thinks VE is mafia ever since my big post.
The sencond line is derailing the thread right now. Yes it may help your reads but I don't care about your reads right now. I want to lynch mafia. And well the third line, you're mafia so it IS a scumslip.
|
On April 11 2012 17:04 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 16:45 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:34 Toadesstern wrote:On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. Oh for christs sake gonzaw. I'm the attention seeking hypno-Toad, don't sit in my spot! Seriously everyone doing a post that's not about YOUR case is some stupid bullshit because people are ignoring the important part in this thread according to you? You've got to be kidding me. I didn't even notice that beause it's so short above my massive wall of text and while you posted I obviosusly wasn't checking the thread but that DOES sound pretty hilarious after all :p 1)No, I think what I posted about VE is somewhat important, and people could very well comment if they agree with what I posted or not, instead of just saying "VE is scummy ##Vote: VE". 2)Also, I'm not too sure about wbg and I posted my reasons why. I'd appreciate it if someone would comment on it too so I can improve my read on wbg, and see what other people think of him. On April 11 2012 16:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 16:29 gonzaw wrote:On April 11 2012 16:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On April 11 2012 15:11 gonzaw wrote: What is an unwinnable situation? One where no matter how much scum we lynch, we still lose.
E.g: If we start at Day with 10v6, it's unwinable, because of this: D-10v6 N-10v5 D-7v5 N-7v4 D-5v4 N-5v3 D-3v3 GG
Meaning if at any day we are 10v6 we win even if we lynch 3 scum in succession, because scum KP will always be 3, and then 2 (scum kill more townies than we lynch scum). Woke up, read through the thread and notice this little gem. He makes a post regarding how mafia would win a 10v6 and accidentally puts in we win, we being scum. Gonzaw, do you have a confession to make? Are you scum? Are you serious? Please read the thread and post your thoughts on what's going on instead of trying to derail it with useless bullshit. Post your thoughts on VE, Toad, my cases, and other players you find suspicious. I did read the thread, though I must admit I missed the ebwop as Toad's huge post drew my attention. Honestly Toad, WBG, VE, and you all look suspicious to me, and I'm highly surprised sputnik didn't flip red. You typed a significant scumslip as it's very likely that mafia would create such a list for use in their own quicktopic and when copypasting it, forget to change the "we". That's why I'm on your ass, the ebwop could just be an oh shit after rereading it or one of your scumbuddies pointing it out. I'll be looking at your filter more closely tonight. 3)Why are VE, Toad and wbg suspicious? Post your reasoning. And what do you think about other players? Who do you think is the most suspicious out of them? And ignore that, it's not a scumslip and you know it. This is gold. Keep on posting gonzaw, please. 1) why do you think your case is so important RIGHT NOW? To make sure people will say you've been on VE all along once he flipped because you thought noone is going to vote the legendary VE aka your mafia buddy? 2) I don't think wbg should be a topic right now unless it has something to do with our lynch, because otherwise it's derailing the thread. 3)The first line might be an okayish question to ask although I am totally fine with people just agreeing with me and bugs. Or are you going to say that everyone who did not have a proper, own case on a mafia-flip has to be a mafia himself? I am pretty sure most cases are something like "a couple of people did the case, the rest read it, agreed and voted as well". You are not asking artanis this question and noone else. Why are you not asking people like Katina that question? Why are you not asking Johnny who, as far as I can recall just said he thinks VE is town and I am mafia, now he says he agrees with what I said and thinks VE is mafia ever since my big post. The sencond line is derailing the thread right now. Yes it may help your reads but I don't care about your reads right now. I want to lynch mafia. And well the third line, you're mafia so it IS a scumslip.
EBWOP
|
On April 11 2012 16:48 Risen wrote: He makes a really good point about copy pasting from scum thread. Still not a car on its own, though.
no he doesn't, no scum would ever post something like that.
If a scumteam is trying to figure out how fast they can win they're not gonna then go and post it in the thread.
|
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote: Ok do we lynch VE or Gonzaw today?
Right now both are voting for a basicly confirmed townie (read: me) and neither of those 2 is reading the game, not even with the most recent flips they're willing to read. I think we got 2 mafia palmars in here.
I'll explain this in three phases:
Okay, first of all, no one is confirmed until they die and flip. In a game with possible framers, uncertain sanities and godfathers, no one is confirmed until they die and flip. I don't care if you explain it in seven thousand phases. No one is confirmed until they die and flip.
This is so important, and I'll be repeating it often.
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote: Phase 1 - Nightkills
We've got a claimed shot from ET against michaelthe. So for now I'm assuming he really is a town vig. Even if he is a mafia vig that doesn't matter because it's about the KP amount. Mafia only as 3 normal KP. So the important part it that this is one additional kill towards the usual 3 KP.
Ok what's left? sputnik.theory Jackal58 MidnightGladius slOosh
That's 4 people. Still 1 KP more than Mafia should have, right? So now ask yourself for a second who do you think mafia shot and more importantly who was the target for our 2nd vig, no matter of alignment?
Let's assume we have a town vig for a second. Do you think a townvig would shoot someone like Jackal when there's people like Sputnik around? I doubt it. Next question: Do you think mafia would have shot sputnik considering there's a shitload of people willing to lynch him? I doubt it. Therefore It's either 2 town vigs or 1 townvig + 1 mafiavig and the mafiavig is ET who shot michael because no way mafia would shoot sputnik. AT ALL. I doubt ET is a mafia vig though but that has nothing to do with me being confirmed.
I'll do you one better. I'll assume we have two town vigs for a second. Know why? BECAUSE TWO OF THEM FLIPPED WITH THE NIGHT KILLS. Two town vigs flipped with the night-kills. But, none of that matters because...
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote:That leaves this list of people who probably got shot by mafia, you may replace sloOsh or midnight with sputnik if you think those 2 looked equally bad but no way a townie shot Jackal: Jackal58MidnightGladiusslOoshThat's still 3 people. What's mafia KP? 3. That means mafia one-shotted every single one of those.Remember who told people NOT TO protect Jackal at all costs? That's right, that's VE and WBG. More importantly, remember who told people to protect Jackal and Toad as well? RIGHT, THAT'S ME click me!So back to our kills. What did I just say? Mafia oneshotted those guys. Do you honestly beliefe I would be asking people to protect Jackal as a mafia if I was about to shoot Jackal with a single bullet? In what world would I EVER do such a thing as mafia?
...your entire reasoning for being "confirmed" by the night-kills is at best COMPLETELY WIFOM and at worst indicative of you having knowledge of what happened overnight. Let me explain.
First of all, your point on "asking medics to protect Jackal" is completely moot because Jackal died. Not only does it not prove that you're town, but you drawing attention to it only makes you seem desperate to "look town".
Secondly, I have NO idea what happened overnight. While it appears likely that scum hit 3 targets, I can't know that for sure because we FLIPPED 2 vigs who aren't here to tell us if they shot and we have one vig (alignment undetermined) who claims the shot on michael. So it's entirely possible that both Jackal AND sputnik shot and, for instance, scum double-stacked Jackal (what I would have done) or bugs (also what I would have done). The fact of the matter is that A TOWNIE CANNOT CLAIM TO KNOW WITH ANY CERTAINTY WHAT HAPPENED OVERNIGHT. The fact that you are claiming that this is some kind of "proof" that "scum one-shotted all 3 of these people" tells me without a doubt that you KNOW this to be the case. Why do I think this? Because I was on your team in XLVIII and you're a scumslipping maniac. So if I had to guess, I'd say that you're absolutely right about the night-kills...but not because you've "proven" it with your WIFOM bullshit, but because I know you like to give town more information than it has when you roll scum.
What now?
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote:
Phase 2 - Votes on Day 1
More onto why I am "confirmed" Look into the people who voted d1 and how they voted. We killed a townie with Janaan. I am pretty sure there's plenty of mafia on him as we had A LOT of troubles getting a lynch at all. Town was probably derping hardcore d1. I guess VE read that I think Hassy is mafia but did not comment on it because he did not think it was a threat because everyone ignored it. Once WBG got in the thread and placed his vote and I did the same he suddenly says he thinks Hassy is Mafia out of nowhere and places his vote there. There's 2 options here: EITHER Hassy is simply mafia and VE did not think it was a threat at all considering we only had like 4 hours left and need 16 people on Hassy and therefore wanted something to later point back and say "lookielookie, I tried killing hassy d1" only to switch later to janaan. The other option is Hassy being a townie, although I doubt that's possible. In that case VE just did whatever he wanted to because both targets are town.
So basicly if Hassy is red there's probably a shitload of mafias on janaan and WBG and I pushed a red while VE conveniently jumped on the wagon himself when it looked to him like it was not going to happen and switched back to Janaan later on. If Hassy is green it's a null
First of all, there was no trouble getting the lynch done on Janaan, and that's due partially to myself and bugs switching to make it happen when the Hassybaby wagon was going nowhere. You're framing your argument with a fact that is completely irrelevant to your point.
Second of all, look at the times bro. Between the time you and Bugs voted for Hassybaby and my case was ~1 hour, and guess what? It was the hour that I was reading filters and writing my cases on Hassybaby and you. You know, The scum-read you've completely forsaken to push this fail-wagon? Bugs too? Remember Hassybaby? Yeah, I was suspicious of Hassybaby, but I didn't "hop on when it was convenient"...I hopped on as soon as I saw that there was support and thought I could help in pushing the wagon. Remind me again how this is "convenient"? And remind me how your vote on Hassybaby a mere hour before mine was any LESS convenient? Your reasoning is seriously faulty here, and it's maliciously wrong. Again, this isn't confirming you as town. Know why? Because no one is confirmed until they die and flip.
Your whole reasoning for being "confirmed" is a fucking joke, and the fact that town is buying it is also a fucking joke.
I'm not laughing anymore.
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote:Phase 3 - VE and Gonzaw the new and improves Mafia-Palmars
I'm going to make this short because this is not about me being as townish as you can get but about VE and Gonzaw being mafia. Short "sadly" means I'll be only covering one point each. It's still a wall of text. First a little about VE:Remember the weird post claiming VE thinks hassy is mafia? I am talking about this one: clicky!The second I saw that I asked wbg what he thinks about it because that post is highly suspicious, wbg said I am probably paranoid and I left it with that for the moment. I'll just quote 3 really short phrases out of that post: thefuck? Really?
Yeah fucker, really. I saw town consolidating (finally) on SOMEONE in Janaan in my readthrough, so in my case I gave my top scum-reads and voted for who was (by my estimation) our best bet for a lynch. I missed your vote and Bugs' vote in my case-building time, and I had no idea there would be support for my scum candidate. What did I do when I realized my oversight? Why, I acted to correct it! Immediately! I pushed what I thought was the more PRO-TOWN lynch in Hassybaby. I've explained all this. Who isn't reading again?
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote: Next thing: Remember how basicly everyone said I am looking okay or nullish except for gonzaw? VE did not say a thing because he saw everyone saying I'm okay, especially wbg and Jackal thinking I'm fine probably made him not want to touch me based on a case that's based on "Toad posts wall of texts". He knows there's no way out of this. He is to go all-in on me to at least get another mislynch before he dies and you know what will happen the second I flip town? gonzaw said he thinks VE and I am both Mafia. The second I flip town gonzaw will walz in this thread telling people some bullshit about being sorry how wrong he was and his reads are so off that he'll have to rethink everything, obviously no longer willing to lynch VE
Actually, Katina has been calling you scum all game. I find it awfully convenient that you forgot this fact considering MY ENTIRE CASE AGAINST YOU TO BEGIN WITH WAS YOUR REACTION TO KATINA VOTING FOR YOU. Oh that's right, you conveniently forget that I did actually write you up as scum in that post too. Who isn't reading again? Wasn't me...
On April 11 2012 15:19 Toadesstern wrote:According to VE I am unreadable. That guy claimes to have legendary reads right now. How is it that someone like Kita FAKECLAIMES DT who got a green check on me in Storm because according to him I was so obviously town (just imagine the situation, fakeclaiming a DT check as a townie, that's rather drastic if you name is not schworz) to save me from being lynched by mafia + SK. Yet VE walzes in this thread saying he wants to lynch me because I am unreadable. Because I am unreadable. I'm going to repeat that. I AM UNREADABLE?!? the fuck-#2 and the fuck-#3 at the same time. There's two possiblities here: 1) He really thinks I am unreadable and has not a single Scumread that is better than true-rnd. 2) He really thinks I am mafia in which case I am not unreadable if he thinks he is right. Case 1 is obviously not the case. IF that would be the case it would mean VE has not a single scumread on d1 with 6 dead townies that he considers to be better than true-rnd. That'd be totally awful. Case 2 is interesting. Why should he claim I am unreadable if he thinks I am mafia? Either he lies about thinking I am mafia OR he wants to have a nice cop-out after lynching me claiming "sry guys, I told you he is unreadable ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif) " Soooo. Long post is already long so I'll stop here. I haven't talked a lot about VE and gonzaw but I'm already doubting all of you will read this because it's so long so I'm stopping here. Take what I said into consideration: Do you really think I am a mafia who single-target-shot Jackal just to ask for medic protection on Jackal prior to shooting him? Do you really think it's a good idea to lynch the guy who was not on the townie lynch d1 while probably of bunch of townies tried to get janaan killed? Do you really think Gonzaw and VE are townies considering what I just said? For those of you you answer a single or more of those 3 questions with yes go ahead and click the spoiler please: + Show Spoiler [click me!] +For those of you who answered all of the 3 questions with a no: Congratz on being awesome. Now talk about who we should lynch today. I am eating my hat if one of those two guys turns out to be town and I've only got a single hat. That's a fancy Faschings-hat (according to dict.cc that word exists in english as well!) and eating that would be painful: + Show Spoiler [my hat] +It's actually not MY hat but the hat of a friend and they're all the same ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1F6zi.png) That being sad. I'll quote myself from this very post because I can not believe how someone is possibly suggesting to lynch me given the kills we got unless that guy hasn't reath the thread or is not actively asking himself what those kills imply. Oh and sry if I got a shitload of spelling mistakes or words missing inbetween. It's 8 am in germany so I'm still pretty sleepy. It took me an hour to write and check it.
So your case on me is: that I think you're unreadable, but have a read on you? My OPINION is that you were unreadable before. Now you've shown your colors. Now you're going to fucking die.
To Summarize: Toadesstern's case against me is 2 phases of WIFOM and bullshit about him being lolConfirmed and 1 phase of "he said I'm unreadable but he has a read on me".
This is the case that everyone is saying "makes so much sense" and sheeping Toad and Bugs over.
If you read this post and made it to the bottom, please go back and read Toad's case again, then come read my response again. He really is this dumb.
Stay tuned for my own little Phase 2 where I describe in great detail why Bugs is scum for being so maliciously stupid in regards to Toad!
|
On April 11 2012 17:04 Toadesstern wrote: This is gold. Keep on posting gonzaw, please.
1) why do you think your case is so important RIGHT NOW? To make sure people will say you've been on VE all along once he flipped because noone is going to vote the legendary VE aka your mafia buddy? 2) I don't think wbg should be a topic right now unless it has something to do with our lynch, because otherwise it's derailing the thread. 3) The first line might be an okayish question to ask although I am totally fine with people just agreeing with me and bugs. Or are you going to say that everyone who did not have a proper, own case on a mafia-flip has to be a mafia himself? I am pretty sure most cases are something like "a couple of people did the case, the rest read it, agreed and voted as well".
1) I want people to post their thoughts on it. I want to see which players have decent reasoning for voting VE, which don't, etc. I want to see how their reasoning extends more by them commenting on my post, or by commenting on what I thought about VE.
2) I find wbg suspicious and could be a possibly lynch, so why not? Why should you decide who can be a topic of discussion or not? You were never interested in the "topics" of discussion before in D1, why are you now then? You are being needlessly authoritarian, and you don't have enough position to do so and get away with it (as in, you are not "confirmed town", you are not even highly considered town by the majority)
You are not asking artanis this question and noone else. Why are you not asking people like Katina that question? Why are you not asking Johnny who, as far as I can recall just said he thinks VE is town and I am mafia, now he says he agrees with what I said and thinks VE is mafia ever since my big post.
The sencond line is derailing the thread right now. Yes it may help your reads but I don't care about your reads right now. I want to lynch mafia. And well the third line, you're mafia so it IS a scumslip.
Seriously? I'm asking everybody to post their thoughts. There are a lot of "scummy lurkers", I can't keep tabs of everyone and ask every single one of them questions, or else I'll do the same thing I did on Aperture which was kind of useless.
Please tell me how it will derail the thread.
Do you want everybody to post "VE is scummy for X and Y ##Vote VE" and then have the day end? Nope, I want more opinions, more people put under scrutiny, more movement. We lose with 2 misslynches, we can't afford to stay still and just follow a bandwagon till death and then just magically assume we will instantly find the remaining scum after said lynch, even if VE flips scum. So stop being so Gestapo trying to get people to tunnel VE and me and fucking let people answer the questions.
And you still haven't reread the thread, read my filter and make a valid case against me. Your FoS on me is almost as scummy as VE's FoS on you.
|
Arggh why can't both of you just die?
VE, don't fucking ignore me, respond to everything I've asked you or die.
##Vote: VisceraEyes
|
People, just to let you know that this is a total shitstorm that will let the remaining scum fly under the radar. Toad is tunneling me and VE and forcing everybody to just vote one of us and not discussing anything else, not even the pressure against him, nothing. Again, his case on VE isn't that great VE is tunneling Toad, on yet another not very good case based on Toad claiming he's "confirmed town" and using that confidence as a scummy trait, yet he keeps ignoring everything else said about Toad.
So people, if you want vote one of them, or day-vig them if you want (I'd be very happy with that); but still post your thoughts on other players and pressure them.
|
Fuck, why do the experienced players have to be scum/useless this game? They are shitting all over the place and not making any sense, or just letting the shitstorm continue and not doing anything to stop it.
Yes I'm talking about Toad/BH/VE/WBG.
Then we have like 100000 lurkers that come every once in a while making a semi-contentful (sic) post and then disappearing again, or not even appearing in the first place.
Pretty shitty luck for this town I must say.
|
Gonzaw you're being ridiculous. Your scumread of me is because I haven't yet commented on a case when a fail-wagon has built on me in the span of a few hours...get over yourself bro. Do you want my help with this Toad wagon or not? Asking for a Dayvig on us is fucking scummy as shit, because not only are we great lynch candidates (many people think one or the other or both of us is scum), but the voting information alone is going to be a gold-mine of analysis.
But you know, kill discussion however you can right gonzaw?
This game is unbelievable.
|
On April 11 2012 17:28 gonzaw wrote: People, just to let you know that this is a total shitstorm that will let the remaining scum fly under the radar. Toad is tunneling me and VE and forcing everybody to just vote one of us and not discussing anything else, not even the pressure against him, nothing. Again, his case on VE isn't that great VE is tunneling Toad, on yet another not very good case based on Toad claiming he's "confirmed town" and using that confidence as a scummy trait, yet he keeps ignoring everything else said about Toad.
So people, if you want vote one of them, or day-vig them if you want (I'd be very happy with that); but still post your thoughts on other players and pressure them. I like this post, because you mention the fact that those players are causing people to tunnel, the proceed to talk about nothing but those players.
|
Also based on the speed of your responses gonzaw, it's obvious that you're not even READING the posts, so WHY THE FUCK DO YOU CARE IF WE RESPOND AND HOW WOULD YOU EVEN KNOW IF WE DIDN'T?
I swear to God, I'm going to blow a fucking gasket if I hear you ask me to respond to your shit ONE MORE TIME when you haven't even read the fucking shit that's going on right now.
|
Fuck this, I'm going to play League of Legends and then go to bed.
Bugs, move your vote. You realize you're voting with Toadesstern and not me, and I'm guessing it's based on something fucking stupid like "Oh, GM had to balance the teams" or something dumb like that. You want me to read you my win-condition next? Fucking unreal...if you're not scum you're being fucking retarded. Think. Read.
|
/facepalm
I'm going to sleep right now, hopefully I'm not so fucking pissed when I wake up.
I'm going to try to make a slight effort in not bursting into fucking rage mode and explain some things here:
On April 11 2012 17:33 Zealos wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 17:28 gonzaw wrote: People, just to let you know that this is a total shitstorm that will let the remaining scum fly under the radar. Toad is tunneling me and VE and forcing everybody to just vote one of us and not discussing anything else, not even the pressure against him, nothing. Again, his case on VE isn't that great VE is tunneling Toad, on yet another not very good case based on Toad claiming he's "confirmed town" and using that confidence as a scummy trait, yet he keeps ignoring everything else said about Toad.
So people, if you want vote one of them, or day-vig them if you want (I'd be very happy with that); but still post your thoughts on other players and pressure them. I like this post, because you mention the fact that those players are causing people to tunnel, the proceed to talk about nothing but those players.
I want people's thoughts on wbg, here:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=325046¤tpage=48#954
I want people to post their thoughts on wbg, and agree or disagree on whether he's town/scum or with the points I mentioned.
I want players, like you, zelblade, Tunkeg, Katina, Grack, Artanis, Blazinghand, Kenpachi, prplz, marvelosity to stop lurking or being evasive, and not only to post thoughts about VE/Toad, but to post your thoughts about other players. Wbg being one of them, and also other from that exact list I posted, or about anything other interesting to you.
Now, you are giving me so much bad vibes with that passive-aggressive post of yours against me it's not funny. Do you think I'm scum? Do you think I'm trying to "derail" the thread? Post it directly, concisely and clearly, and I'll try to argue with you about it if you want. Do you think I'm not? Then post something constructive instead of adding fuel to the fire.
I hope Jitsu and ET come here and set some things straight, or at least generate other discussion.
|
It's a fair point you make in the 2nd half of the post, and should have said that to begin with, instead of getting so pissy. I think it's easy to point me as inactive as I miss most of the discussion while I am asleep, and have to catch up and try to post something useful in the morning.
I think WBG is very difficult to analyse. I am leaning towards scum, but I think VE would be a stronger lynch for today. Kenpachi seems useless, making odd votes and not often trying to make a case about it, or convince the rest of town to vote the same way.
I think you are town. However, I also think you are getting too emotionally attached to the game and need to step back and look at the bigger picture. An angry town is a bad town, we need to analyse posts with objectivity in order to get the best reads.
Scum VisceraEyes Possibly Toad, based on the VE flip
Suspicious Kenpachi Zelblade (inactivity and unwilling to post, I'd like him to answer the same questions as me)
The people I think are town Jitsu ET Gonzaw Toad (again, depending on whether or not VE flips mafia)
|
|
|
|