EPT##Vote OriginalName
A Game of Thrones Mafia - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
##Vote OriginalName | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
(They might just be offline too, though...) | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On March 22 2012 04:29 Xatalos wrote: Nicolas and layabout haven't posted anything yet either... Any others who haven't? To me, it seems suspicious to observe for a long time and then make the obligatory post near the deadline. (They might just be offline too, though...) I'm going to say we need to wait a bit more before calling people lurkers. I woke up, posted a bit and then went to class. Some people have jobs and shiz where they wouldn't be able to respond until later today (like 6-8 hours) | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On March 22 2012 04:35 Risen wrote: I'm going to say we need to wait a bit more before calling people lurkers. I woke up, posted a bit and then went to class. Some people have jobs and shiz where they wouldn't be able to respond until later today (like 6-8 hours) Heh, good point  I'm going to sleep in a few hours though, and if they haven't posted anything yet by the time I wake up, I'll start to get suspicious of their intentions! But it's true that most people can't come online at several points during the day, let alone while not at home. I can use my phone to check this thread, if need be, but those "lurkers" might only access internet once per day or something... | ||
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote Nicolas | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
| ||
|
evantrees
Canada497 Posts
On March 22 2012 04:15 wherebugsgo wrote: And if I told you that you have to lynch me in order to win; what happens then? We have another reason to ignore you. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On March 22 2012 03:15 Acrofales wrote: Any further discussion will have to wait til I'm home. Be back in about an hour. PS. I read through a couple of games before signing up for this one. It's quite different to play than to watch! :D where you at homeslice and why should i think you are not scum | ||
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On March 22 2012 03:04 Alderan wrote: I've played with gumshoe a couple times now, and he always seems to start out slow but then get better and eventually help. He's the kind of person that's going to post enough to eventually hang himself if he is indeed scum, I say we leave him for now. On March 22 2012 04:03 Alderan wrote: Certainly not giving him the free pass, just saying given the information we have right now I would feel uncomfortable lynching him given this is how he has begun every game I've played with him, and he was town both times. Nobody said we had to lynch him but you seem to be keen on keeping any pressure at all off of him. At the same time all your doing otherwise has been making snarky comments Gumshoe... I just dont get this dude, half the things he says seem to just scream posting for the sake of posting with huge paragraphs filled with nothingness. for example: Wasn't aware, always thought mayors were just achieved through consensus. In regard to Acrofales I'm sure your well aware that my sympathies always go to first time townies who fuck up at the start, but his response was just pure ombus, which was similar to sloosh and ech in suprisingly normal mini mafia, yet the difference was in that game Sloosh and Ech kept fighting blow for blow because they knew they were townies, Acrofales just sort of clammed up. He's not fighting hard enough, which first time newbie townies tend to do way too much. I'm down for voting for him not because of his silly ombus, but because he backed down when pressured. Random meta arguement that probably has zero bearing on the actual situation. Newbies reactions are hard to place because they are newbies YOU CANT META THE NEWBS THEY HAVE NONE. Also meta in and of itself really doesnt mean shit without other evidence first, if anything you seem to be just defending him because you feel bad that hes a newb. That is beyond a shitty reason to defend him and dives into the realm of stupid, we dont lynch new scum then we leave them till its too late. Personally I think we should stay clear of trying to lynch Baelish, unless someone claims there him just before we kill him, in which case they fully deserve to die as we had already decided. If we lynch Where it should be because we think hes scum, not Baelish, do you really think Where is scum this early in the game? ( : but keep in mind it is possible(though unlikely considering scums hate for flashy play early on) Scum play not being flashy early on? What are you talking about, how do you think scum influences lynches and such if anything scum is going to be loud in order to convince people that just because they are speaking and 'contributing' that it makes them obvious town. I mean really how often do people want to lynch actives day one on the basis that "we could go after lurkers" or other such excuses. If anything lynching an active but shitposting player is a much stronger way to start a game. If we run out of leads day 2 we start pressuring more lurkers or if we still have absoulutely nothing nearer to the end of day 1 then its in the meh choice and really if we are forced to kill a lurker day 1 then we clearly arent trying hard enough to make people actually spell out opinions. Personally I think we should stay clear of trying to lynch Baelish, unless someone claims there him just before we kill him, in which case they fully deserve to die as we had already decided. If we lynch Where it should be because we think hes scum, not Baelish, do you really think Where is scum this early in the game? ( : but keep in mind it is possible(though unlikely considering scums hate for flashy play early on) So right after you agree with Sand on the ignore Baelish point you come back and reference him again. What part of mod confirmed do you not understand HE CANNOT BE SCUM and im 95% sure this is not a bastard mod game where he is scum. Does he have a KP or not is irrelevant because we cannot stop him. There is no point in bringing up the is he scum or not unless your trying to misdirect people into searching for a reason to waste a lynch on him. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
Anyways, I thought this started a day after it did, so I am a little late to the party.  Let me tell everybody my opinion, so you can get a good read on me! First we have Acrofales overreacting to a vote that didn't have a basis. On March 21 2012 22:54 Acrofales wrote: Okay seriously WTF. I know I'm new to this game, but voting me for that reason alone makes no sense. In fact, it seems quite a scum move to cast suspicion on people right at the start of the game. Or am I going overboard and it's just a way of getting people to post at the start of the game? Either way, I'm watching you and risk.nuke. Voting off the bat seems fishy. He then votes for Mattchew. On March 22 2012 00:04 Acrofales wrote: Hodor's terribly talkative all of a sudden. Luckily I have better sources than that. The Ghost of High Heart told me that you are scum. ##vote: Mattchew Lyter defends Acrofales. On March 22 2012 02:15 Lyter wrote: I'd say ignore wbg at least for now, we have absolutely no idea what his motives/intentions could be, when more of a picture is formed then we should come back to it by all means. I'm not sure on Acrofales, yea he could be flipping a shit cos he got called out so early, but his actions are hardly unlikely for a new guy anyway. Then Mattchew, bad spelling in hand, attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales I really don't like that Mattchew attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales, who I think at this point is innocent. It also seems silly that Mattchew is 100% positive that Acrofales is innocent over one nooby overreaction. If you look at Mattchew's filter, you will see he only said something slightly helpful when he was asked to; everything else is just him attacking other people without any real reason. For now, I think he is most likely to be scum. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17799 Posts
On March 22 2012 05:16 Mattchew wrote: where you at homeslice and why should i think you are not scum Because I'm town. How about you? | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
On March 22 2012 05:32 MrZentor wrote: Hello people of Mafia! It is I, MrZentor! Anyways, I thought this started a day after it did, so I am a little late to the party. Let me tell everybody my opinion, so you can get a good read on me! First we have Acrofales overreacting to a vote that didn't have a basis. He then votes for Mattchew. Lyter defends Acrofales. Then Mattchew, bad spelling in hand, attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales I really don't like that Mattchew attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales, who I think at this point is innocent. It also seems silly that Mattchew is 100% positive that Acrofales is innocent over one nooby overreaction. If you look at Mattchew's filter, you will see he only said something slightly helpful when he was asked to; everything else is just him attacking other people without any real reason. For now, I think he is most likely to be scum. I have nothing against pushing the point, as we are yet to see a real responce for Acrofales, who I would personally like to see make a stance and give his opinion on the current ongoings. Although I do agree the way in which he "pushed his point" was pretty brash, it doesn't scream mafia to me atm. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On March 22 2012 05:09 layabout wrote: @Bugs, meme me. since I feel too lazy to write my own insults, I have outsourced them to a kind programmer to automatically do them for me Take that, layabout. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
After that, I would like to hear your take on Gumshoe and those of us attacking him. | ||
| ||
