• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:10
CEST 14:10
KST 21:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202559RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Dewalt's Show Matches in China BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 830 users

TL Mafia L

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
August 20 2011 15:21 GMT
#45
/in ftw
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 04 2012 03:58 GMT
#89
/in
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-06 15:23:42
January 06 2012 15:23 GMT
#179
Oh fuck I accidentally voted yes for the PMs.

I would very much like a NON PM game. So I'll out if it is PM. Doubt anyone cares though, just will free up a slot for someone else.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 06 2012 23:57 GMT
#192
no PMs=sexy time
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 10 2012 06:07 GMT
#265
you guys are weird
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 12 2012 13:37 GMT
#378
town players for like the last 3 months have been playing really badly.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 13 2012 10:11 GMT
#516
wtf all you tryhards already have massive mayoral candidacies going?

-_-

I'll support sandro/Foolish/BC for mayor if I feel any of them are town. That'll take some reading. Which I don't feel like doing right now. Right now, I feel like playing Akali.

The rest of you: if you are voting anyone other than those three, please explain why.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 13 2012 10:18 GMT
#518
On January 13 2012 18:34 Palmar wrote:
I have no intentions of running for mayor or caring much about the mayor elections. I'm probably going to be voting VisceraEyes, depending on how dumb he will be through the day.


lynch Palmar for this please
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 13 2012 11:07 GMT
#538
On January 13 2012 19:46 Erandorr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2012 19:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 13 2012 18:34 Palmar wrote:
I have no intentions of running for mayor or caring much about the mayor elections. I'm probably going to be voting VisceraEyes, depending on how dumb he will be through the day.


lynch Palmar for this please


lynch WBG for this please.


alright, need to sleep after this.

However, minimal reasoning follows:

in every game I've ever played with Palmar that has a mayoral election, he has cared greatly about it. He has run for office. He has run strongly. The exception is PYP:I, where he was just smurfing (so that's understandable) but he still cared who got elected.

In this game, he's doing his standard scum shit. I.E. being bad. Kill him.

Also Erandorr if you continue to be worthless I'd probably consider killing you too.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:11 GMT
#816
BC, Mason me please.

I repeat, BloodyC0bbler, mason me please.

Thank you.

Also, I want to kill Palmar, so any mayoral candidate who supports lynching him will get my vote.

Since I haven't seen anyone explicitly say that yet, if you want Palmar to die just vote me and I'll lynch him if I become mayor.


Still in the process of reading, on page 35 now.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:24 GMT
#820
On January 14 2012 05:31 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 04:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 14 2012 03:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC: Well, obviously you're no GF this game, because you claimed a confirmable role. Unless I'm mistaken, scum can't be mason AND GF, yes? DT checks will be accurate on you...so there's that. Confirming your alignment, in my opinion, should be paramount because I find it EXTREMELY likely that you would have elected to be mason on the scum team (for reasons that should be obvious to you and several others.)

What's your plan on confirming your role? Are you going to out who you've masoned with? Are you going to let them do it at their own pace?



I will out my first mason shortly, I want the debate to however move towards how to deal with masons as a whole. I say this because you know from experience with me just how subtle a touch can be needed to manipulate/confuse someone. A mafia mason will have the experience of a team in manipulation whereas a town member has their own ability to run with.

On January 14 2012 04:01 Toadesstern wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 14 2012 03:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
The Day 1 Important Discussion Post #1

Read this post fully before posting. It is something that everyone must read, and that everyone must comment on

That is right friends, this post as I am writing it is near one of the most important posts of this game day. You are going to ask? Why BC? Simple. I am about to do something that will cause people to yell and scream at me. I am roleclaiming.

I am mason

Note what I have done?
[1]
I have now put myself from the statistical chance of flipping a town aligned role of 80%ish and lowered it to a solid 50%.

I am now either 50% red or 50% blue.[/1.]


I am doing this for a few reasons.

[2]
1) in this game there could exist masons on both sides of the equation. As such dealing with them early is key as they work behind the scenes of the game. [/2]

[3]
2) it is a confirmable role, stress this point, ROLE. I can confirm my role at the beginning of a day cycle as opposed to at the end of a day cycle [/3]

3) I am being transparent. By giving this information now, reading me becomes far easier. There will never be the "is he blue trying to breadcrumb etc..?"

[4]
4) goes along with 3, however it outs one of the masons now. It stops the discussion later of people discussing all the people who are masons and who is believable late game whereas we can cover at least one of them now [/4]

This also sets the town up in a very advantageous way. Why you ask?

I am elected and now town knowingly knows I am active in pms.
I am not elected and not auto lynched by mayor and same information is known.

[5]
It also forces the mafia to deal with me as they have no idea what I am doing in pm land. Do they try and kill who I am talking to? Do they use their own masons and attempt to find out what I have said, etc....[/5]


This I feel is the most advantageous day 1 use of my ability. I have already used my mason use for the day and will say who I used it on after this post in the nearish future. I am leaving who it is out as the purpose is to generate discussion on my claim, not on who I chose to mason to. As to detail of why I did this aside from the general points I made? Everyone will have an opinion on this claim. Some good, some bad. People will have to have an opinion on this subject however. EVERYONE will have an opinion. Do not just post "wtf bc you dumb fuck why would you do this". This is a debate about me specifically being a mason and if I should be elected, not elected and lynched, or not elected and left for the mafia to deal with me.

All vets, all new players, all semi experienced players will have an opinion and it is needed. Anyone who fails to properly contribute on this matter. I have thought this claim out and realize that generally claiming day 1 is bad, however I feel at least with this mechanic and how it could be abused it should be discussed (especially with a high profile player such as myself possessing it) now and not later.

On the most important note that this post will do however is generate serious discussion. How do you all wish to proceed with a mason claim? Specifically my mason claim?

1) That's obviously bullshit. The chances to win lottery aren't 50% because you either win or you don't... but I see what you want to tell us

2) why?

3) no it's not. You're masoning someone. That someone is going to tell us if you masoned him. If you are a mafia you could tell us you masoned a mafiabuddy and of course your buddy will tell everyone you pm'ed him.

4) I don't realy care about what's going to happen with discussion later on if whatever might happen. I want to get a town mayor right now and for that reason I'd much rather see things tell give me something on your alignment than something that might or might not improve future-world

5) I'm pretty sure mafia will have to deal with you no matter what. That is if you're town. It's not like mafia is going not kill you because they think you might be a green instead of a blue and therefor you're no threat to them.


Incorrect for you good sir.

my role unlike anyone elses is confirmable. However my role is able to appear on both town and mafia sides thus rather than claiming "i am townie" and having the 80ish% chance of being one of the townie i am now firmly 50/50. My role is confirmable, my alignment isn't. You can clearly say "you were either 1 or the other before" however I have removed fake claiming almost entirely. Mafia do not benefit from me fake claiming this, nor do town.

as for how I can confirm my role at the start? I mason at the beginning of a cycle not the end.

As for saying its not confirmable? If i am a generic red and claim mason my mafia buddy says i masoned him. I die flip mafia goon he fucking dies. The only people who in their right mind would claim mason, are mason. As for also saying im not transparent? You know my role, I am even trying to discuss the role itself.

If you do not care about the possible damages of a mafia mason late game and only care about the now then you are not playing in the best interests of this town. You must always look ahead. If there are roles that could potentially fuck town two days from now that wouldn't have if we talked about them today then we talk about it today. Period.

as for mafia dealing with me? Say for arguments sake, there are 4 masons and 1 is red. I don't get elected and am not lynched by mayor. Mafia now has the option of killing me and thus reducing the number of people they can hide amongst and masons are confirmable. By claiming, town will always be analyzing me and determining if i am red or blue and choose to off me based on it.

Mafia have the risk of killing me early and thus potentially outing one of their own early on or leaving me alone and hope the town ignores me. The longer I live the more benefit i am to the town and if i die by mafia shot I out one of their own slightly faster.



Now. How do people wish to deal with masons as a whole? Do all discussions made get posted in thread? Do we opt to not talk to people who mason you, etc...

This is an important matter, move just passed my personal claim and look at the role as a whole. Here is a link to a thread where masons were discussed before to get an idea why I think its important to discuss.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=278946

the situation proposed there is obviously different from this game but the important none the less.

The Mason this game is more just about whispering it looks like. It really isn't that strong in the game. They can't create circles or nothing. They can disseminate roles privately I suppose but the threat is always there that the mason is mafia. As you yourself might be BC. I don't really see too much power in the role as of the moment. Especially if you play the game as such as to ignore pms.


You're a vet, right?

I want to kill you for this too, cause you're not acting like a vet by saying masons are not powerful.

They are by far the most powerful types of roles in both the hands of scum and town.


On January 14 2012 06:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm still wondering the proper benefits to the mass mason claim. I'm neutral as again, the role seems rather bland for the town this game. Being a mason doesn't confirm you. I'd like to know the general town consensus.

So far I see Sandroba screaming for mass mason claim. Which I suppose all of the whisperers being public knowledge would be a good thing. But I don't wanna feel like sheep. I suppose theres no way around it though, or that its really important. I'm Mason #2. And I mason'd BC. But he won't talk to me. *cries*


You smell weird, scum.

Everyone take a moment to read this post and see how damn neutral it is. There is no actual content and the language is meek.

and this one :

On January 14 2012 06:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Sheth....For real? That is your reason for voting for someones who already stated that their activity will be waning? Would all it take to get you to change to BC or Sandroba be a declaration of lynching Ciry or is it just because he has already chosen his lynch target?

Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. Welcome back.



loooooooooool

My final message for now:

If you want to be useful, stop discussing shit like whether masons are town favored or scum favored. Agree that they're powerful and stop wasting valuable discussion and scumhunting time.

Instead, use it to actually find scum. If you can't do this, please show yourself so I can push for your lynch.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:30 GMT
#824
On January 14 2012 10:28 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Also, BC when are you claiming who you masoned with? I'd like confirmation about your role.

Right now, I'm leaning town on you. I've seen you manipulate townies before in PM as scum, and in light of that, your mason claim makes it seem like you're more likely to be town. I don't see a benefit for a scum BC to claim mason, when it puts a lot of pressure and suspicion on himself, when instead he can just win the election and use his secret mason role to manipulate townies. Instead, you're going to be forced to pretty much claim your target every day, and anyone you talk to is instantly going to be more on guard after all the discussion today.


let's get this straight right now, so we don't have to deal with this later:

BC's mason claim is NOT reflective of his alignment in any way, shape, or form.

If he's scum, people saying "oh yeah his mason claim makes him more likely to be town" and then voting him are exactly what he wants! Good scum take calculated risks like this, and this very well could be a calculated move to get the mayoral position.

Since the mason claim is not indicative of alignment, please do not suggest that it is, because such a suggestion is not even close to conclusive or useful.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:38 GMT
#829
On January 14 2012 10:35 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:30 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:28 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Also, BC when are you claiming who you masoned with? I'd like confirmation about your role.

Right now, I'm leaning town on you. I've seen you manipulate townies before in PM as scum, and in light of that, your mason claim makes it seem like you're more likely to be town. I don't see a benefit for a scum BC to claim mason, when it puts a lot of pressure and suspicion on himself, when instead he can just win the election and use his secret mason role to manipulate townies. Instead, you're going to be forced to pretty much claim your target every day, and anyone you talk to is instantly going to be more on guard after all the discussion today.


let's get this straight right now, so we don't have to deal with this later:

BC's mason claim is NOT reflective of his alignment in any way, shape, or form.

If he's scum, people saying "oh yeah his mason claim makes him more likely to be town" and then voting him are exactly what he wants! Good scum take calculated risks like this, and this very well could be a calculated move to get the mayoral position.

Since the mason claim is not indicative of alignment, please do not suggest that it is, because such a suggestion is not even close to conclusive or useful.


yeah that's what i keep saying. Or at least I tried to. I see his claim as reasonable in some situations and it's it could be good for both, townie and mafia BC. I'm pretending that mason never happened at this point in time,

I'd also like to leave palmar for d2 to see what changes. It's not like he's going to run away and if he's still behaving like that, fine lynch if. For the time being we got some better candidates to look at imo.


no, screw leaving people till day 2. If he's useless now he'll be useless day 2. Kill him.

I couldn't care less about veterans and usefulness later on or all of that bs. If you're a vet and I think you're scum day 1 I want you to die day 1. Palmar fits this perfectly. Just look at his filter if you don't believe me; he's had a full day (and by EU time it was an actual day, I've only had about 6 hours worth if you compare) and all of his posts have been one liner marginal content bull.

He also refuses to respond to any sort of pressure and has been completely incapable of any sort of scumhunting. He's scum. Just kill him.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:40 GMT
#831
On January 14 2012 10:38 Foolishness wrote:
Mattchew For Mayor!


You heard it from me first!

No I am not giving up on my campaign for the one and only BILL MURRAY. Rather it has come to my attention that my other client, the esteemed Mattchew the Mason has decided to run for mayor as well! How do I know my client is a mason? Duh! I have only been talking to him all day long! And he will come in shortly to confirm that!

Of course he has chosen to done this because he thinks it is best for him to claim mason. I am not sure how I personally feel about the other mason's claiming but I can tell you this: Mattchew is most certainly a town mason and not a mafia one, and the both of us think he will be perfect in office. You should obviously be taking this with a grain of salt, but if I thought Mattchew was actually a mafia mason I'd be saying so right now in a very "haha sucker!" sort of manor. Since I'm not you can be sure that I have done my analysis and confirmed that he is innocent (and I encourage everyone to do the same based on his thread posts). That said Mattchew has my full support in getting into office.

Let's face it, none of us what to get screwed over in the event that BC is mafia. The thought of BC laughing hysterically after the game is over at playing us all for fools is not something that sits right in my stomach (not that I think he's actually mafia, but better safe than sorry right?) Thus let's take a more simpler approach and vote a mason who we know will be giving his all and not screwing us behind the scenes!

Mattchew For Mayor!


stop trolling and answer me this:

do you think Palmar is mafia?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:47 GMT
#837
no, he's literally this bad as mafia. If he's this useless, he's auto scum.

If he's town he'll actually put in effort. This is not WIFOM because if he were town he would not want to confuse us. He would be clear about establishing himself as a townie and the "WIFOM" you speak of wouldn't exist.

Honestly there is no WIFOM, the only possibility for Palmar at this point is scum.

Since you keep saying let's keep him till day 2, I assume you have a better candidate for us to lynch? Why don't you give us that candidate? If not, then let's lynch Palmar, not? Why wait a day and waste a lynch that will potentially hit a townie instead of just killing the almost certain scum in Palmar?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:47 GMT
#838
that was @ Toad my bad.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 01:53 GMT
#844
On January 14 2012 10:51 Mattchew wrote:
Would anyone like to discuss my mayoral candidacy? I think I make the best case to get a townie in office


no.

start discussing something useful, like who to lynch.

all of your lynch candidates suck.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 02:02 GMT
#849
On January 14 2012 10:58 Mattchew wrote:
So why would you not vote for me wbg? Wouldn't you rather have a confirmed townie in office than someone you would be taking a leap of faith on?

The 3 I listed are all acting scummy, not trollish or over the top scummy, just scummy. Palmar is trolling and over the top, he would be a great day2 lynch if these actions continue, but it is too up in the air right now as to whether or not he is trolling or scum. He could be one of our biggest strengths in the future, I'd rather kill someone else now.


just by the fact that you consider yourself confirmed town I don't want to vote you.

I don't understand why everyone says "Palmar would make a great day 2 lynch." If he would make a great day 2 lynch he'd make a great day 1 lynch. Let's stop screwing around and get to business, yeah? The pussyfooting we've been doing so far has been detrimental to town discussion and multiple people have already stated that they've been sidetracked by the stupid mason discussion.

All of the alternatives posed to Palmar right now are noobs or people who are otherwise not easy to read. Palmar is super easy to read; if he's playing like shit, afraid, and dodging questions or scumhunting, he's scum. If he's aggressive and tunnels people, he's town (now watch him come in and randomly tunnel someone for a while since I said this)
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 02:46 GMT
#869
On January 14 2012 11:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Wiggles go vote for me right now and don't move your vote DUDE

I'll be the bestest Mayor Liquidia has EVER SEEN.


shut up about being mayor and start doing something useful.

This is why I hate mayoral elections; they bring day 1 to shit by muddying everything up and allowing scum to just prance around happily doing whatever the hell they want.

Stop giving the mafia fields of flowers to frisk around in. Start scumhunting.

Give me your opinion on Palmar to begin with.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 02:51 GMT
#873
I'm willing to vote bum for the fact that I like him right now. I think he's

Bum are you willing to lynch Palmar?

I'd be willing to lynch BC too if I continue feeling the way I'm feeling about him. But we'll see. Need more time on that, since BC is much harder to read than Palmar. Palmar's just like lolscum
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 02:52 GMT
#874
On January 14 2012 11:49 bumatlarge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:39 Jackal58 wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:13 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:06 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:50 Jackal58 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:48 bumatlarge wrote:
ATTENTION THOSE WHO READ BUM'S POSTS

I like BC, and I think his goals are pro-town, but I also feel our best move is to not make him mayor based on that. He has stated to me that he is not expecting to win from his claim, but I would like him to live up to that self-less expectation. If he has a good lynch candidate, then I'll get behind him. Town masons, it's up to you how you feel you shoul act based on BC's proposal, but be prepared to explain exactly why you haven't followed up on it already.

Cyber_Cheese is my lynch choice at the moment if I get voted in. He had a very "why not?" campaign, got himself into multiple players scopes early on and I feel like people are actively not discussing candidates for lynch. If there are a few people who are actual scum, distractions like endlessly swamping BC with point-less accusations about his claim, scum tend to not like talking about them.

BC, if you vote for me, I'd prefer to have you as sheriff where you can mantain your protection while being ut under the microscope with your claim. That sounds reasonable, no?

@meapak: I'm not reliable? lol please bro, I'm the most reliable person in this game. I'm readable and smart, and as mayor I can nail that one-time lynch, and then my votes will always be reliably placed. I HAD RESPONSIBILITY COMPLETELY UNDER MY THUMB... regardless of what my voting history said lol. You said this a while ago so, if you think I'm not good enough to be mayor just come out and say it cupcake.

Who is still running? THREAD PRESCENCE PEOPLE. If I can't remember if you are running or not, then you might as well opt out. Any half-assed campaigns by townies are detrimental, because I'll take your ass to court in analysis if you said you were campaigning and coughed up empty in the useful department.

RPGs dude.
You killed us.

Please stop bringing this up, I had posted multiple times in the QT what we were going to do, and I had to manage your massive failure in the item game, as well as all these items in the black market that were OP as hell. You wanna push this, then blame it on the mods or something. As far as I was concerned, I was 1 of the only two useful townies that game, and I would have won it single handedly. Bringing this up is just a testament to how amazing I am as a leader.

Thanks jackal, I'm expecting your vote any minute now.


EBWOP: Forgive this post, I got angry. If you really think I'd play this game exactly the way I would play insane mafia 2 where I was the police chief and the mayor, and you think someone here would have done a better job in the same position, then fine.

I'm opting out of the race. I'm clearly not meant to be mayor on TL ever again.

That said, Slardar, the strength of the mayor is how much ressure is put on them by deciding the lynch. Scum can run bullshit campaigns if all they need to live up to is having +3 voting power and night protection. Scum mayor's get massive amounts of flak very quickly because it becomes apparent rather quickly that they don't have town's best interest.


I'm sorry Bum. I had no intention of pissing you off. You are one of my favorite people on here.


Aw, you're one of my favorites too. But prepare your anus if you bring that up again.

I'd probably vote for someone who was going to lynch cyber_cheese, or explains a better candidate. I don't see why ciryandor or palmar are scum over cheese.


look at any day 1 where Palmar is scum and compare it to this game.

There is a certain specific one I want you to look at. Wiggles knows what I'm talking about.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 02:59 GMT
#877
On January 14 2012 11:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:46 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Wiggles go vote for me right now and don't move your vote DUDE

I'll be the bestest Mayor Liquidia has EVER SEEN.


shut up about being mayor and start doing something useful.

This is why I hate mayoral elections; they bring day 1 to shit by muddying everything up and allowing scum to just prance around happily doing whatever the hell they want.

Stop giving the mafia fields of flowers to frisk around in. Start scumhunting.

Give me your opinion on Palmar to begin with.


I was starting to think he's not a good lynch for today, but honestly he's been more useless than his 'useless D1 town' meta would suggest, so I think he's probably scum...he's not hiding it or anything. I'll never understand what his deal is - the thing about playing scum is you just play like a fucking townie, and we all know how much he LOVES playing town...fucking dumb.

But yeah, I think he's probably scum, but it's too early in the day to say if he's a good lynch or not (he might bring the pain here in a few hours, who the fuck knows?) I'm ABSOLUTELY down with killing it with fire if he doesn't step it up before the lynch tomorrow.

Where the shit were you like 8 hours ago when I was having this conversation with Palmar? I could have used the backup. My 'g' key is fucking broken.


I was asleep 8 hours ago. I stayed up till like 5:30 lol. (8 hours ago was 11 am here)

also Palmar's day 1 meta as town is not be useless. It's establish himself as town. He's done nothing so far to do that. That's a common theme among his scum games; on day 1 he keeps posting one liners and not doing anything.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 05:03 GMT
#899
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&user=87086

bum I don't know what you see, but what about any of these posts has utility in any way shape or form for town?

In what world is Palmar "not 100% useless" in his current state?

None of his posts have breached one line and almost all of them have 0 content. He says Meapak is good, which isn't very helpful, he calls kita's (very valid concerns about his play, mind) dumb, he calls VE dumb and bad, he asks a noob how he knows his meta, and he wants to vote Protact because of a half-assed early game case on ciryandor.

If you seriously believe Palmar is not useless then I have to question your angle.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 05:42 GMT
#902
no, lynching Palmar is not like lynching a lurker. It's like lynching someone whose meta you know really well because you play with them all the time and you know they can't be town because when they are town they don't do this stupid shit that they do when they're scum and blah blah blah run on yeah you get the idea palmar scum cause he sucks as scum and his play sucks

lol

anyway Protact's posting makes sense, but I'm not fully on the trust Protact wagon yet. Not sure if BC is a great lynch today because he hasn't been useless. He's been making contributions. It's true that he has derailed the town into talking about masons, but part of that is the town's own stupidity. As I said before, what BC has done can be a calculated risk to go for the mayor position. I'm not willing to elect him, but I'm not willing to lynch him either. This is mostly because BC is very hard to read and what he has done so far is not conclusively alignment-suggestive.

Palmar, on the other hand, is one of the easiest players to read. Routinely in games he's the first person I have a town read on (or a scum read, in this case). Having played many games with Palmar, (almost all of my games have had Palmar in them) I know what he looks like as scum and as town. This is not a townie Palmar.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 06:10 GMT
#906
On January 14 2012 14:54 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
Are you saying this to get Palmar to post more? For instance if he kicks up his game and starts posting a lot, will you still think he is scum?

I realize I'm ignoring the rest you said about Prot and BC, I agree with you mostly on that as well. From knowing my fair share of people who when they roll scum they play with very little posts (in fact my first game I feel scum lost because of Palmar's inability to post or even make an attempt) so I'm definitely not saying to trust Palmar, just I don't think we've given him enough time yet.


no, I'm saying this to get you guys to realize that he needs to be lynched.

I don't care what potential he has as town to improve, because he's almost certainly not town and he's been given more than enough time to "improve" so far. He's not town. Kill his ass.

Since none of the current candidates want to lynch Palmar, vote me if you want to see him die. I will run on the platform that Palmar dies today.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 08:29 GMT
#948
people who need to die:

Palmar
opz
cyber cheese

people who need to post more, and if are consistent with their current state, should die eventually:

sheth

people who are neutralish but if continue to say stupid things should die:

bumatlarge
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 09:12 GMT
#956
On January 14 2012 17:38 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 17:29 wherebugsgo wrote:
people who need to die:

Palmar
opz
cyber cheese

people who need to post more, and if are consistent with their current state, should die eventually:

sheth

people who are neutralish but if continue to say stupid things should die:

bumatlarge

Palmar you covered. Why opz/me/sheth/bum?


nvm upon rereading you're not necessarily scum.

just kinda slow
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 10:43 GMT
#977
On January 14 2012 19:40 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
If I'm elected, I'm going to lynch BC for two reasons.
It's much easier to post as town. PM games are pro-town, and masons are a step closer to that. Posting on a mason QT and in the thread is much easier than having to appear townie on two fronts. Mafia masons only exsist to allow us to doubt the allegiance of town masons. BC seems to trying to scare us out of using one of our advantages.
BC seems like an intelligent player, and as such, I doubt he would have offered a plan unless he knew it was going to assure him some sort of benefit. Contrary to what someone said, people did have some time pre-game to speculate on the setup. BC showed in mafia XLVIII? (the 80p game) that he did put effort into thinking through strategies before games started.


this doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

Also, you have a snowball's chance in hell of being elected because your campaign is awful. This is actually why I thought you were scum. You very well might still be scum, and I might just be overestimating your badness, but I guess I'll wait and see on that one since I believe Palmar to be nearly 100% scum at this point.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 10:59 GMT
#986
On January 14 2012 19:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 19:46 Palmar wrote:
On January 14 2012 07:19 GGQ wrote:
By the way, Palmar should not be given a free pass to post badly on day 1 so that he won't be killed night 1. That's just silly logic.


Should kenpachi be?

Palmar, you know you're playing bad, I know you're playing bad, WBG knows you're playing bad. Right now I think you were trying to see who jumped on you for your play. Gambit's over, it's time for you to be useful.

And the fact that you compare yourself to kenpachi should really indicate that you've taken this little game as far as it's gonna run. Tell us what you learned by doing what you did.


this is definitely not a gambit, not after the way the previous games unfolded for Palmar. Steamship, XLVII, XLVIII, and another one that I will not name. Palmar KNOWS that the #1 priority for any and every townie day 1 is to establish his or her own innocence. He has failed to do anything to even come close to that. With less than 24 hours left in the day we don't have time to screw around anymore.

We kill him today.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 10:59 GMT
#987
On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote:
Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum.


I don't explain shit to scum
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 11:04 GMT
#991
On January 14 2012 20:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote:
Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum.


I don't explain shit to scum

Explain it to me then.


go read my filter

in one word, meta.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 11:51 GMT
#1000
On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 20:04 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote:
Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum.


I don't explain shit to scum

Explain it to me then.


go read my filter

in one word, meta.


So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case?

Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case?


if I'm wrong about you being scum right now it reflects more on how bad your play is right now than mine.

The fact that you are willing to try and guilt me into laying off you suggests you already know I'm town. Otherwise, you wouldn't ask whether I am willing to bet my abilities as a player on this case, since if I was scum I'd have no vested interest in something like that.

So, that just strengthens my case even more.

TL;DR, go die, scum.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 12:11 GMT
#1005
On January 14 2012 21:01 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 20:02 Macpo wrote:
It's getting clear that Bill Murray is the way to go.

Mr Wiggles, a good town, but he just doesn't want to be on the stage too much, so I guess the mayor role doesn't suit him very well.

BC: way too unclear and risky for me; he is trying too much stuff, going for a thousand contradictory stuff, taking back what he said and so on.

Bill has shown a lot of presence, and has made reasonable analyses, plus he is not afraid. That's enough for me up to now, I think we won't have better than that.

To those complaining about me being rational, it's getting obvious that they prefer random one line crap to argumentation. I'll answer back when they'll meet my standards.

Also, I changed my mind on Cybercheese, as he opened my eyes on the the BC case.

To bill: some people here have NOT posted yet at all!! I feel fine about lynching sandroba, as he acts quite scummy, but I suggest that if you are elected, you lynch someone who has not talked yet. statistics we'll be that it is mafia.

Your list of election candidates is lacking.
My post there was heavily inspired by Protactinium. I'm not voting him because outside of that post focused purely on BC, he doesn't seem to have left many opinions on anything, or made any promises we can hold him to, but as is, he seems like one of the better candidates.

Also, what are your stances on Kitaman, VisceraEyes and MrWiggles

Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 20:51 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:04 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote:
Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum.


I don't explain shit to scum

Explain it to me then.


go read my filter

in one word, meta.


So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case?

Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case?


if I'm wrong about you being scum right now it reflects more on how bad your play is right now than mine.

The fact that you are willing to try and guilt me into laying off you suggests you already know I'm town. Otherwise, you wouldn't ask whether I am willing to bet my abilities as a player on this case, since if I was scum I'd have no vested interest in something like that.

So, that just strengthens my case even more.

TL;DR, go die, scum.

WBG, you might be right, but with meta alone you aren't very convincing.

Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 20:57 Palmar wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:51 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:04 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 20:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote:
Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum.


I don't explain shit to scum

Explain it to me then.


go read my filter

in one word, meta.


So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case?

Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case?


if I'm wrong about you being scum right now it reflects more on how bad your play is right now than mine.

The fact that you are willing to try and guilt me into laying off you suggests you already know I'm town. Otherwise, you wouldn't ask whether I am willing to bet my abilities as a player on this case, since if I was scum I'd have no vested interest in something like that.

So, that just strengthens my case even more.

TL;DR, go die, scum.


No, because you don't have a case. My play is in no way, shape, or form bad. Take away the Palmar name, and you have someone you'd probably have a town read on. This means you're not reading the game objectively, and thus it's your play that's bad, not mine. If you remove meta from a case, it should still have some merit to it. Does yours?

The only possible way you're playing well right now, is if you're scum.

You always get trapped in an 'I'm being accused, the person must be scum' state of mind Palmar. Remember what happened with Ace in XLVIII?


I'm not in the least bit surprised in your response; I didn't bother to reiterate myself because I knew you wouldn't understand my argument to begin with.

Go back and read my filter again if you are town.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 14 2012 12:18 GMT
#1007
also for anyone who is legitimately concerned that I am tunneling Palmar so early in the game, go look at what I did in Steamship, XLVII, Resurrection, etc. After I saw Palmar's scum play in XLV I have found that there are consistent patterns in his play that almost never change. He admits this himself; he knows his scum play is not good.

However, his town play is incredibly easy to figure out. This is actually why it makes him a pretty good town player; he establishes his innocence very quickly. This is why, in Resurrection, in Steamship, and in XLVII I spent almost no time at all in concluding that Palmar was town. It's just stupidly easy to do so.

In this game, there is absolutely no reason to think Palmar is town. In over 24 hours, there has not been a single reason to do so. That's an incredibly long amount of time for someone who is normally as active as Palmar. Of course there isn't going to be anything much stronger than a meta argument at this stage in the game for someone like Palmar, with the kind of scum playstyle that Palmar has. This is true almost by definition; scum Palmar puts next to nothing in thread, and is, quite literally, absolutely worthless to town.

I personally am surprised that players like Wiggles and bum have not caught onto this yet. Maybe I'm paranoid, maybe I'm seeing things. But certainly I believe 100% that the best lynch for today is Palmar. I wouldn't say this if I didn't fully believe it, since I probably have played more with Palmar in the last 3 months than anyone else here. I know his current play. If you don't believe me, that's fine, but I don't see anyone pushing anyone better for lynch.

Let's stop this stupid mason discussion shit and actually move on to hunting scum. Too many of you have been saying you'll do it and then not actually following up. We have around 15 hours left in the day and no candidates have any real momentum, and the scumhunting is still extraordinarily minimum.



wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 00:28 GMT
#1341
alright, I need to get my sleep schedule back -_-

I'm here, I just have around 15-20 pages to read.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 00:53 GMT
#1348
lol

this game is stupid.

Mafia are leading us all in every which way and none of you have yet to realize it. In fact, I'll bet a lot of money that at least 8 out of 10 of them are literally doing nothing while one or two are doing the majority of the posting.

The two players that have stood out to me most today as scummy are opz and Palmar. I think they need to die. Protactinium changing from BC to macpo after Foolishness says he's suspicious of macpo is incredibly suspicious. IMO Protactinium is probably scum too, mostly because I don't actually see how Macpo is anything other than a noob, and the timing of the suspicion change is in itself suspicious.

We also very obviously have a lot of masons, which makes stuff like this:


On January 15 2012 06:20 Palmar wrote:
I think this game is infested with masons and jacks, and I think the sooner we realize this, the sooner we can actually start getting something done.


useless filler.

On January 15 2012 06:56 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Also wtf is up with the triple vote on WBG? That look suspicious as hell and I'm not going near that with a 10 foot pole.


I don't know what that was about, but imagine how stupid it would be if I was scum. I'm pretty sure it was just coincidental. I don't know the alignments of the players who voted me, but I personally don't find it suspicious, just coincidental.

At this point I'm pretty far from winning (I think, I only have 4 votes? and BC and Protact should have more from what I saw in the thread) and no one seems to agree that Palmar needs to get lynched. Which is, honestly, depressing. It probably means whoever gets elected into office will lynch some noob who ends up flipping town, and then we find out nothing about the alignment of the elected official.

Foolishness: If you are here, I would like to hear your opinion on Palmar and also on who you think we should lynch. Is it Macpo? If so, why are you pushing such a new player despite the fact that plenty of other players have played similarly to him? Why are you concerned with a player who is potentially much harder to read than the dozens of veterans in this game?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 01:14 GMT
#1357
Lanaia, if you agree with lynching Palmar can you explain why you don't want me elected?

Who are you looking at voting for?

I don't particularly care for getting elected. All I care about is scum dying. So far I don't think macpo is scum and none of the other candidates have come up with anything promising. So, that means the only option to get Palmar lynched is to elect me in to office.

(this is suboptimal, for reasons I won't explicitly explain)
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 01:59 GMT
#1372
On January 15 2012 10:24 Palmar wrote:
So, it's 1 am my time now.

WBG, I think you're town, however, you're playing terribly. You don't have a case on me, you've never written one up. If you remove meta from your case you're literally stuck with nothing.

I suggest we put visceraeyes and protactinium in the office. I would prefer a BC or Cyri lynch, maybe even sandroba.

Anyone who's town and voting for someone that intends to lynch me, needs to take a look at what they're doing, because I'm not the one playing badly, I've simply posted less than usual. There is nothing you have on me expect meta, thus the case is completely invalid, and when I flip town, you will have proven yourselves to be really dumb and bad.

It's one thing voting for a bad case, but voting for a non-existant one?

Anyway, make the right decision, nighty.


I don't need an explicitly written case just because someone who I think is scum asks for one. I really don't understand what mafia players attempt to accomplish when they insist there's no case on them and then demand one. It's just a waste of time.

Which, I suppose, is a win for you. You love wasting time as scum.

Cases don't become invalid because they use meta. The fact that you're suggesting something that Cyber_Cheese would agree with is pretty damning of you. (no offense, Cyber_Cheese, but it's clear you don't actually understand how powerful meta is)

Also, it's funny you choose to defend yourself and have not put forth ANYTHING about anyone you think is scum, and go to sleep only a few hours before deadline instead of actually doing something productive. You have no interest in town affairs beyond looking townie or at least surviving till day 2 because this town is full of pussies who aren't willing to lynch a vet day 1.

Man up, all of you, and lynch this guy.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:02 GMT
#1374
Get your votes off Protact+VE.

At least one of them is very likely to be scum at this point.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:03 GMT
#1377
On January 15 2012 10:20 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:
Lanaia, if you agree with lynching Palmar can you explain why you don't want me elected?

Who are you looking at voting for?

I don't particularly care for getting elected. All I care about is scum dying. So far I don't think macpo is scum and none of the other candidates have come up with anything promising. So, that means the only option to get Palmar lynched is to elect me in to office.

(this is suboptimal, for reasons I won't explicitly explain)

you think sandroba is town?


not at this time, no.

I have no reason to believe sandro is town, but likewise I don't have much reason to believe he is scum either.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:08 GMT
#1379
On January 15 2012 11:04 Nisani201 wrote:
ffffffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu i pressed post by accident...

Anyways, WBG, a case based entirely on meta IS invalid. If Palmar acts like this in D2, we can treat him like a lurker. We should all expect scumhunting from him tomorrow, but until then, the case on him is stupid.


no, it isn't.

It's not even completely based on meta. CC and Palmar just keep asserting that it's completely based on meta on the fact that I summed it up with one word, saying meta.

The reason I summed it up was to bait to see if Palmar would spin that I had no case. He did exactly that.

You don't find it weird that he wants VE in office despite calling VE bad over and over? What's the use of electing someone bad to an office that protects them? What's the use if VE would never get shot?

Why would Palmar not run for office if he's town?

Why would Palmar suddenly support Protact and provide no reason for it?

Why is Palmar not scumhunting?

Why is Palmar focusing so much on defending himself when it's only me who is attacking him? He focused on defending himself so much, in fact, that he's literally commented on nothing else. Which is not that shocking, I suppose, since he hasn't done anything to begin with.

Why do Palmar's only two non-one-liner posts contain almost 100% fluff?

None of these are meta reasons to kill Palmar, yet no one cares.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:15 GMT
#1383
On January 15 2012 11:13 Nisani201 wrote:
It's pointless to scumhunt on D1 with elections because no one is really getting lynched anyways. If he decided to scumhunt with correct reads, that would make him a mafia target anyways.

That's why we should keep an eye on him on D2.


it's pointless to scumhunt d1?

Yeah, let's just fucking waste all the time we have day 1 because we don't want to play the game of mafia, AKA FIND THE SCUM AND KILL THEM.

this is fucking ridiculous.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:20 GMT
#1389
On January 15 2012 11:16 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 11:08 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 15 2012 11:04 Nisani201 wrote:
ffffffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu i pressed post by accident...

Anyways, WBG, a case based entirely on meta IS invalid. If Palmar acts like this in D2, we can treat him like a lurker. We should all expect scumhunting from him tomorrow, but until then, the case on him is stupid.


no, it isn't.

It's not even completely based on meta. CC and Palmar just keep asserting that it's completely based on meta on the fact that I summed it up with one word, saying meta.

The reason I summed it up was to bait to see if Palmar would spin that I had no case. He did exactly that.

You don't find it weird that he wants VE in office despite calling VE bad over and over? What's the use of electing someone bad to an office that protects them? What's the use if VE would never get shot?

Why would Palmar not run for office if he's town?

Why would Palmar suddenly support Protact and provide no reason for it?

Why is Palmar not scumhunting?

Why is Palmar focusing so much on defending himself when it's only me who is attacking him? He focused on defending himself so much, in fact, that he's literally commented on nothing else. Which is not that shocking, I suppose, since he hasn't done anything to begin with.

Why do Palmar's only two non-one-liner posts contain almost 100% fluff?

None of these are meta reasons to kill Palmar, yet no one cares.


you think VE did a good job most recently? Because you're telling me to vote VE but I don't think he's up to the task.

To get this straight. I'm either spot on with my analysis because those 2 + BM are the 3 people I am considering to vote or I'm horribly wrong and am leading town to another lose because of townidiots (in this case I'd be one).

I think all 3 are probably town right now. But I think BM's better than VE in an office and I am horribly scared to vote Protact.


where did I say I want people to vote VE?

all the candidates suck right now, that's why I haven't voted yet. I almost wish I could abstain.

I want to kill Palmar+Protact+opz. Probably kill VE too.

BC is probably the safest bet at this point for office but I'm not feeling great about him either. I wish Foolishness would be a bit more active so I could actually talk to him, but w/e.

Sandro why are you not doing anything? Who do you want lynched? Who do you think is scum?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:22 GMT
#1391
On January 15 2012 11:20 rgTheSchworz wrote:
WBG, I kinda get your point. But you seems like you just want palmar dead RIGHT NOW. If we wait till day 2, we can confirm your case. Remember, there are roles other than scum that sometimes adopt Palmar's behavior.

If he continues to post 1-liners and fluff, then you confirm what you said, right now.
It is suspicious that he wants VE, because VE has f-ed up with his partnership with CC, he turned back on him almost instantly, remember?AND he keeps calling VE bad.

But Macpo has raised FoS on himself because of his apologetic behavior, etc. Contrast this to Adam, who is himself relatively newbie, but seems more confident AND DOESNT MAKE LISTS.

I will support any investigations on Palmar's actions ON DAY 2


waiting till day 2 does nothing.

You only wait till day 2 if you have a better candidate for lynch. So far, there isn't one.

Guaranteed we wait till day 2, if Palmar (or the other two I'm suspicious of are) is scum, I die n1 and then you all derp yourselves day 2 into not lynching him.

I can't guarantee I'll even be alive to influence town at that point.

Macpo is not a good lynch. The case is bad and I really think Protact is likely to be scum.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:26 GMT
#1395
On January 15 2012 11:24 Nisani201 wrote:
WBG have you been reading the thread?

BC, Sandroba, and Ciryandor are much better candidates that have a much better chance of flipping scum than Palmar.


no, no, no, and no.

BC is not as likely to flip scum. You're eating Protact's words and spitting them out exactly as he wants you to do. He doesn't even fucking support lynching BC anymore.

Sandro is not as likely to flip scum. Sure, he's done nothing so far but often times on day 1 sandro as town doesn't do anything. He's harder to read than Palmar. So far, he's neutral to me. That's not a good lynch.

Ciryandor is also relatively new. He might make a good lynch in the absence of Palmar, but again, he was pushed by Protact (who is extremely scummy atm) so I am wary of lynching him.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:27 GMT
#1397
On January 15 2012 11:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
WBG calm the fuck down bro. I'm not the problem here. I'm certainly not scum, and I think you know it.

When you say 'all the candidates suck' does that mean you think they're all scum? Or do you just say that because none of them are going to lynch YOUR lynch choice? Be a man, vote for the best candidate and just see what happens.


no, you're not the problem, Palmar is.

and no, I just think all the candidates suck.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:38 GMT
#1401
On January 15 2012 11:35 Lanaia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:
Lanaia, if you agree with lynching Palmar can you explain why you don't want me elected?

Who are you looking at voting for?

I don't particularly care for getting elected. All I care about is scum dying. So far I don't think macpo is scum and none of the other candidates have come up with anything promising. So, that means the only option to get Palmar lynched is to elect me in to office.

(this is suboptimal, for reasons I won't explicitly explain)


The amount of people who voted you so quickly within such a short period of time bothered me. I know it wasn't enough to swing the vote, but it really rubbed me the wrong way.

Dammit, I wish I'd not waffled so much in regards to switching my vote. Now, it's kinda too late. I really can't tell if this is my being paranoid or not.



firstly, it was only 3.

Second, I have next to no chance of actually winning the election at this point.

Third, the votes came right after wiggles posted something positive about me. (IIRC)

Fourth, I don't even know why they voted me so quickly. If I was scum that definitely wouldn't have happened; too much risk for no reward. Imagine, if I was scum and even one of those people was scum with me, that'd be a terrible trade. I'd be outed and so would at least one of my buddies.

Since it doesn't make sense from a scum perspective ( I can't see why scum would want to elect me either) I can only assume it was a coincidence.

It's possible one of the voters is scum. In which case, it would definitely make sense for them to do that; they immediately vote after another person votes me to make me look suspicious. Obviously if that was the plan, it worked.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:41 GMT
#1402
On January 15 2012 11:37 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 11:35 Lanaia wrote:
On January 15 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:
Lanaia, if you agree with lynching Palmar can you explain why you don't want me elected?

Who are you looking at voting for?

I don't particularly care for getting elected. All I care about is scum dying. So far I don't think macpo is scum and none of the other candidates have come up with anything promising. So, that means the only option to get Palmar lynched is to elect me in to office.

(this is suboptimal, for reasons I won't explicitly explain)


The amount of people who voted you so quickly within such a short period of time bothered me. I know it wasn't enough to swing the vote, but it really rubbed me the wrong way.

Dammit, I wish I'd not waffled so much in regards to switching my vote. Now, it's kinda too late. I really can't tell if this is my being paranoid or not.



if that's going to help you: even more people switched to protac shortly after people switched to wbg.


yes, this is another thing:

notice how no one pointed this out. It's clear that I was made to look suspicious despite the fact that Protact was actually the one gaining mass votes in a very short timespan.

This makes even more sense from the perspective that scum want to make me look bad, since no one commented on the way Protact picked up votes.

The most scummy thing about Protact is the switch from BC to Macpo as the lynch target after Foolishness said Macpo was suspicious. This makes BC look more town (if Protact is actually scum.) However, I'm wary of posing connections since we haven't seen any flips. I'd look closely at Protactinium, however, because I really don't get a very town-like vibe from them.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:46 GMT
#1404
On January 15 2012 11:42 Lanaia wrote:
Is protac in the lead, do we know?
ugh, there's no way WBG is going to win at this point. :/

In order to get someone into mayorship who I'm not going to be all paranoid about, I'd have to vote Bill Murray. I'm not 100% sure that is the best for us, though. Then again, I really don't know much about him.
I'm actually fighting so hard with myself here.

WBG, who do you think would be our best bet right now? I'm not seeing your vote in the vote thread for some reason (unless you haven't voted which would make sense).


I haven't voted.

I'm thinking about voting BC. As I've said repeatedly, I don't like any of the candidacies. Bill Murray is a bad candidate. Who is he even going to lynch?

None of the proposed lynch candidates are any good. None of the reasons for mayorship are good either. I'd like to vote BC because he looks the most townie of the people who have run and he's the most likely to get shot as well.

I would vote for Foolishness if he actually had a chance at becoming mayor. Although, at this point, as usual he has done very little so his alignment is still unknown. Mafia will definitely shoot him n1 if he's town, though.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:48 GMT
#1406
after the last vote count, Protact got 6 votes and 1 unvote, going from 7 votes to 12. He's definitely in the lead by at least 4 votes.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:48 GMT
#1408
sandro is a bad candidate because he has a reputation as town for not doing much day 1. It's the same reason you wouldn't lynch Foolishness day 1.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:54 GMT
#1416
On January 15 2012 11:54 VisceraEyes wrote:
Is BC the best candidate?


why are you asking us? Aren't you self-aware?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:57 GMT
#1420
BC if you are willing to lynch Palmar I will vote you. Otherwise, I'm going to waste my vote by voting someone random.

If the last vote count was correct, BM at 9, BC at 8, Protact at 12.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 02:58 GMT
#1422
ah fuck it

##vote BloodyC0bbler
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:02 GMT
#1430
I'm pretty sure scum want BM in office over BC.

Which probably means BC is town. Kita is scum.

dat bitch.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:07 GMT
#1434
On January 15 2012 12:07 bumatlarge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 12:03 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:02 bumatlarge wrote:
I think it's too late now? I still like protact, no one has gone in depth why he shouldnt be mayor

all gut feelings and one line accusations :/


bum really? His only cause to analyze me is he doesn't like my claim and is using year old + games to prove his case against me where the style in both was completely different.

Everyone go back and read pick your power 3 and read jimbo silvers play, guess what, that was incog. Compare to this game now.


You think he is SK? :D

No i don't think you are scum, protact said he wouldnt kill you. Just because protact is mayor doesnt mean he gets to decide the next lynch. If he does lynch you he has a lot to answer to :/


Protact already washed his hands of BC. He's going to lynch macpo.

I'll be shocked if macpo actually flips scum.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:10 GMT
#1437
On January 15 2012 12:07 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 12:00 supersoft wrote:
VOTE BC GUYS!!! ASAP!!!

inognito shouldn't be mayor!!! macpep or whatever his lynchtarget is called is a horrible kill.
Palmar is the one and only good case right now.


What's good about it (why am I awake at 3am?)


LOL AND HE SHOWS HIS FACE LOLOLOLOL

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:12 GMT
#1444
On January 15 2012 12:09 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 12:07 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:07 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:03 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:02 bumatlarge wrote:
I think it's too late now? I still like protact, no one has gone in depth why he shouldnt be mayor

all gut feelings and one line accusations :/


bum really? His only cause to analyze me is he doesn't like my claim and is using year old + games to prove his case against me where the style in both was completely different.

Everyone go back and read pick your power 3 and read jimbo silvers play, guess what, that was incog. Compare to this game now.


You think he is SK? :D

No i don't think you are scum, protact said he wouldnt kill you. Just because protact is mayor doesnt mean he gets to decide the next lynch. If he does lynch you he has a lot to answer to :/


Protact already washed his hands of BC. He's going to lynch macpo.

I'll be shocked if macpo actually flips scum.


Honestly, at this point if he doesnt lynch me is is confirmed scum. Do I want to die? No, but if he gunned this hard to analyze me to death as red then refuses to pull the trigger then hes full of shit. He knows I won't flip red and knows he will die right after. If he is able to fuck with town this hard now, keeping me around to continue to argue with will make more confusion and waste more time -_-


IMO he's already almost 100% scum just by the fact that he chose Macpo shortly after Foolishness suspected him.

It makes total sense from a scum perspective if you are town; you are a risky day 1 lynch and if you flip town that puts a lot of pressure on Protact. So instead he chooses the target that the number 1 scumhunter would choose (Macpo) and then washes his hands of the responsibility of lynching you.

It's incredibly fishy. The unfortunate part about all of this is the fact that we've very likely elected a scum to office, and we lost a very good chance to lynch scum today.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:16 GMT
#1448
On January 15 2012 12:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 12:12 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:09 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:07 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:07 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:03 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 15 2012 12:02 bumatlarge wrote:
I think it's too late now? I still like protact, no one has gone in depth why he shouldnt be mayor

all gut feelings and one line accusations :/


bum really? His only cause to analyze me is he doesn't like my claim and is using year old + games to prove his case against me where the style in both was completely different.

Everyone go back and read pick your power 3 and read jimbo silvers play, guess what, that was incog. Compare to this game now.


You think he is SK? :D

No i don't think you are scum, protact said he wouldnt kill you. Just because protact is mayor doesnt mean he gets to decide the next lynch. If he does lynch you he has a lot to answer to :/


Protact already washed his hands of BC. He's going to lynch macpo.

I'll be shocked if macpo actually flips scum.


Honestly, at this point if he doesnt lynch me is is confirmed scum. Do I want to die? No, but if he gunned this hard to analyze me to death as red then refuses to pull the trigger then hes full of shit. He knows I won't flip red and knows he will die right after. If he is able to fuck with town this hard now, keeping me around to continue to argue with will make more confusion and waste more time -_-


IMO he's already almost 100% scum just by the fact that he chose Macpo shortly after Foolishness suspected him.

It makes total sense from a scum perspective if you are town; you are a risky day 1 lynch and if you flip town that puts a lot of pressure on Protact. So instead he chooses the target that the number 1 scumhunter would choose (Macpo) and then washes his hands of the responsibility of lynching you.

It's incredibly fishy. The unfortunate part about all of this is the fact that we've very likely elected a scum to office, and we lost a very good chance to lynch scum today.


Apparently I got mayor (was requested to send in my lynch choice)

Palmar was my pick


what the eff

how did you get mayor? He had like six votes on you or something
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:22 GMT
#1460
On January 15 2012 12:11 Ciryandor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 12:03 kitaman27 wrote:
Sorry guys, the OP has the incorrect deadline and I was catching up on the thread thinking I would have more time. I'm around page 62, but I'm voting BM because he is the strongest town read I have at the moment of the post. I'll try to post when I finish reading.

Can the OP be updated with the correct deadline?


As for the comment on lynching, Proact, even if he has changed targets, at least is not being wishy-washy by giving a list of choices, he is at least committing to a specific person to lynch.


LOLLL

didn't think yoiu were scum before but I definitely think you are now
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:27 GMT
#1470
watching Palmar try to play scum is really hilarious.

about as funny as this shit:

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 03:33 GMT
#1481
wowowowowowow.

Alright, I was wrong. Fuck.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 07:48 GMT
#1508
lol. I'm not scum.

Palmar played exactly to his scum meta. That's not my fault. Sure, in hindsight you can blame me for the lynch. I'll take responsibility for it. Being wrong doesn't make me scum, however. It just makes me vocally wrong.

At any rate, if you can find reasons to call me scum, go ahead and do it. I'll respond to any accusations that are put up.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 07:48 GMT
#1509
the problem for me now, of course, is that no one is going to listen to me.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 08:53 GMT
#1519
On January 15 2012 16:50 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 16:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
lol. I'm not scum.

Palmar played exactly to his scum meta. That's not my fault. Sure, in hindsight you can blame me for the lynch. I'll take responsibility for it. Being wrong doesn't make me scum, however. It just makes me vocally wrong.

At any rate, if you can find reasons to call me scum, go ahead and do it. I'll respond to any accusations that are put up.


The part that is your fault is that you only considered meta.
I don't think a scum member would have pushed someone so hard with such a weak argument, so I'm not really holding it against you yet.


I didn't only consider meta. I summed it up as a mostly meta argument, which for Palmar is normally very strong.

At any rate, it's irrelevant now to finding the remaining scum. Unfortunately, since he flipped town.

I still suspect opz and Protact.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 10:52 GMT
#1537
On January 15 2012 17:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
@GiygaS

I listen to you bro. Remember that game where you and Palmar fucked me up as mafia? His play was spectacular that game...he really convinced me he was a townie when I was calling for his HEAD D2. You played the fallguy to a T, not outting him at all. I was thoroughly impressed, and I'm not the only one.

Palmar doesn't do shit like that anymore. When you left, Palmar's play took a SHARP turn for the worse, and he's lucky to live past D2 these days. I thought he was scum all game too...especially when he still vouched for me for office.

I guess my point is, I think you're barking up the wrong tree where WBG is concerned. Here's how you handle that guy.

@WBG
Would you link to the most recent game where you were town and Palmar was scum?

@Cyber_Cheese
Would you point to a post with content that Palmar made during D1 that wasn't within 30 minutes of the lynch please? Failing that, could you stfu about WBG's meta-only case on Palmar?





The last game where I was town and Palmar scum was XLV, that was actually the only game I've been town when Palmar was scum. It was also like my third game (and by far my worst)

However, I caught him being scum in Responsibility when I was scum based on one thing he said. He said he agreed with what prplhz said about BC (which town Palmar would never do...he just doesn't agree with people he thinks are dumb) and I changed our team's shot last minute off Palmar.

As for Palmar's post content, even that singular post he made came after I pressured him to hell. Palmar's play just wasn't satisfactory for me. Can't change that now, but perhaps I should've spent my time on other people.

Anyway, as soon as I can I will make a short summary of why I find both opz and Protact to be scummy. For now, I'll be sleeping.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 20:37 GMT
#1607
On January 16 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Townies read this.

If you think someone is scum. Don't say I think he is scum. Quote, point out and explain where and what it is that this person have done to make you feel a certain way.

If you find the manner of how someone post suspicious. Explain why. Make sure that the reader can follow your train of thoughts and understand how you came to your conclusion.

If you think anything at all about someone else and you want to comment on it. Ask yourself before you finnish typing.
Have I Quoted?
Have I explained my views clearly?
Have I pointed out or marked key parts.
Hae my train of thoughts been clear?

If everyone only did this it would make the scums life alot harder.


I like how you don't do this.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 20:49 GMT
#1609
On January 16 2012 05:43 Kurumi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 16 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Townies read this.

If you think someone is scum. Don't say I think he is scum. Quote, point out and explain where and what it is that this person have done to make you feel a certain way.

If you find the manner of how someone post suspicious. Explain why. Make sure that the reader can follow your train of thoughts and understand how you came to your conclusion.

If you think anything at all about someone else and you want to comment on it. Ask yourself before you finnish typing.
Have I Quoted?
Have I explained my views clearly?
Have I pointed out or marked key parts.
Hae my train of thoughts been clear?

If everyone only did this it would make the scums life alot harder.


I like how you don't do this.

I have three drinks, which one should I drink?


probably the one that kills you.

Or that Polish vodka, that shit is strong.

You scum this game btw?

Sandro where are you? Foolish where are you?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 21:01 GMT
#1611
On January 16 2012 05:56 Kurumi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 05:49 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 16 2012 05:43 Kurumi wrote:
On January 16 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 16 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Townies read this.

If you think someone is scum. Don't say I think he is scum. Quote, point out and explain where and what it is that this person have done to make you feel a certain way.

If you find the manner of how someone post suspicious. Explain why. Make sure that the reader can follow your train of thoughts and understand how you came to your conclusion.

If you think anything at all about someone else and you want to comment on it. Ask yourself before you finnish typing.
Have I Quoted?
Have I explained my views clearly?
Have I pointed out or marked key parts.
Hae my train of thoughts been clear?

If everyone only did this it would make the scums life alot harder.


I like how you don't do this.

I have three drinks, which one should I drink?


probably the one that kills you.

Or that Polish vodka, that shit is strong.

You scum this game btw?

Sandro where are you? Foolish where are you?

Not drinking alcohol till 18, I am Town as I mentioned earlier. Why You want me dead?


I'm just kidding, I don't actually want you dead.

What do you think of sandroba? BC? Protact?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 21:22 GMT
#1616
@ Toadesstern:

Please explain why you find bumatlarge to be scummy.

Also, summarize your thoughts on Protactinium and sandroba while you're at it. I want to know things from you.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 23:42 GMT
#1633
I don't agree that Protact has been giving town direction at all. Notice how absent they have been for the vast majority of the last 24 hours?

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 15 2012 23:47 GMT
#1637
On January 16 2012 08:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 08:36 Nisani201 wrote:
The problem is that it's not a town circle. Once a single mafia gets in the circle, it becomes anti-town, because the entire mafia will have information that certain townies will not.

That doesn't matter. It does not become anti-town if a mafia enters the circle. The masons shouldn't trust each other to begin with, but it will very hard for any mafia to actually keep up a facade of being pro-town and contributory for long. This means the other masons in the circle will be able to sniff out and reveal any scum among them. This also forces all claimed masons to actually play the game and contribute, as they will be forced to perform in the mason circle.

Have you ever played in a game with PMs or a mason circle?

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Neighbor

Read that.


it does if it's someone like BC or L.

If I were scum in this game I would love your plan. I would infiltrate the fuck out of that circle and seed whatever bs I could come up with.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 00:26 GMT
#1641
On January 16 2012 09:05 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 08:42 wherebugsgo wrote:
I don't agree that Protact has been giving town direction at all. Notice how absent they have been for the vast majority of the last 24 hours?



well yeah but he I consider him being right with some points about BC. I think the talk about masons was not good for town. We could have discussed something else as well, we had enough stuff (like who's acting scummy) and who we want to lynch.
BC kind of produced a mass claim. I still don't know if it's that bad but it certainly was not was he intended, at least not without discussing it but discussing it took way too much time when we needed to get a defined picture of our mayors.
So yes, protac posted very little, I am scared of him as well and I'd love him to be in no office at all. Still what he posted gave me town vibes.

What are your thoughts about sandroba, bum, bc and protac? I think I answered them good enough from my point of view.


sandro is probable scum unless he does something tomorrow. He's so far been useless and his idea about the mass mason claim was stupid.

Protac I think is scum based on how he switched lynch targets. He/they switched as it was convenient, to macpo.

Bum, I'm unsure of so far (haven't read through his posts thoroughly tbh). From the initial read I was getting, townish. However, I don't think I've given him as much attention as I should have. I will reread the thread again a couple more times with the flip in mind.

BC, I'm leaning pretty town. The only thing that's unsettling is how little he said about Palmar before lynching him, but I'm fine with the lynch and I wasn't really set off about anything else BC has done.

The thing about the Palmar flip is that it makes people like zeks, opz, and several others look bad. Lanaia looks bad as well; she has not commented on anything concrete and so far has had no scum reads. It looks rather similar to her play from XLVII.

At any rate, I still want thoughts from people on Protac and opz. Sandro/zeks/Lanaia thoughts would be nice too.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 03:32 GMT
#1698
4 KP and right after deadline, Protac says "sandro is innocent because Ciryandor flipped scum"

Sup scum gambit?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 04:55 GMT
#1724
On January 16 2012 12:45 Scamp wrote:
I was expecting a rash of modkills. I'm highly disappointed. Though the death of Ciryandor is nice.

Not really sure why WBG thinks he should still be talking right now.


lol

you've done a lot too this game, eh?

I might have been wrong but I'm not as useless as you are.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 09:16 GMT
#1746
On January 16 2012 17:12 Scamp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 16:11 Lanaia wrote:
49. Scamp - I'm neutral-leaning-scum on this guy.
On January 16 2012 12:45 Scamp wrote:
I was expecting a rash of modkills. I'm highly disappointed. Though the death of Ciryandor is nice.

Not really sure why WBG thinks he should still be talking right now.


I don't like that he was expecting it and was highly disappointed in it. Proportionately, it was more likely to see a lot of town in there. Him saying that ciry's death was nice felt a bit... unnatural. Also, is that bitterness I see towards WBG? Care to reiterate what you mean by the last line, scamp? How is he playing that is so bad to you?


Were you not expecting a bunch of modkills? I thought that everyone was expecting them.

And yes I have bitterness toward WBG. I don't like the way he plays. As for clarifying the last line, how about I let WBG do it himself.

Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 16:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
the problem for me now, of course, is that no one is going to listen to me.


And later...

Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 09:26 wherebugsgo wrote:
The thing about the Palmar flip is that it makes people like zeks, opz, and several others look bad. Lanaia looks bad as well; she has not commented on anything concrete and so far has had no scum reads. It looks rather similar to her play from XLVII.


He neglects to mention himself in all of this.

I'm not ready to make a full-blown case out of this but if you look at WBG's post history it would make a lot of sense if both he and BC are scum.


In what twisted world would I say that I look bad after the Palmar lynch? No shit I look bad after the Palmar lynch, it doesn't take a genius to figure that out, nor do I have to say it to make it obvious. It just is.

Also, since I know I'm town, why would I even entertain the idea that I could "look bad" (aka look like scum) after the lynch? My goal is to find scum, not talk about how bad I look after Palmar flipped town. This isn't the game of "feel bad about yourself after you're wrong and stroke your ego when you're right." It's about finding scum. Obviously I failed yesterday, doesn't mean I'm scum.

Obviously you don't give a shit about finding scum, you just don't like my play. This is, of course, why you have never actually outright called me scum. You're just pussyfooting around the issue and saying you dislike my play instead of putting in a real opinion.

If you had any interest in town affairs you'd probably comment with something that helps us achieve our goal of killing mafia.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 09:18 GMT
#1747
and yes, I am calling you scum for that. inb4 omgus
##vote Scamp
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 09:30 GMT
#1749
On January 16 2012 18:26 Scamp wrote:
It's called accountability, and it's also called playing the game well. Since you have no interest in either of those things, it makes perfect sense that you would vote for me as a knee-jerk reaction.

I expect you to try to find scum when you're done crying.


How am I supposed to be accountable for Palmar getting lynched?

Bring him back to life?

Quit?

Stop playing?

I am finding scum. You're a pretty good bet for it IMO.

Oh also, I laughed at this:


On January 14 2012 15:02 Scamp wrote:
Sheth, if we've not given Palmar enough time yet, then how much time is needed? More importantly, who have we given enough time to instead?


While you pretty much had no opinion on the Palmar issue day 1, you said this. I guess you were on my side of that issue, eh? Didn't want to cut Palmar too much slack?

So what happened when Palmar flipped? You immediately attacked me. Sure, I lead the lynch. Meanwhile, day 1, you did jack shit.

I have something to own up to. I have something to take responsibility for. You don't, because you haven't done anything. Bet it feels nice to be useless, eh?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 09:46 GMT
#1751
anyway, for the world outside of Scamp, I have some pressing questions I want answered while I'm asleep:

Sandro: you have still not responded to me man, what's going on in there? What are your thoughts on the game? Same question to Foolishness. You both have so far been incredibly lazy. If you are town you need to start talking to me (and town in general) now, else you will probably receive the majority of the votes for today. I'd be glad to jump on the incoming scumdroba bandwagon if this continues, as it certainly seems like that is beginning to take off.

BC: Who are you looking at lynching today? I'm not sure about kingjames being scum. From what I understand he's a friend of yours; can you explain why you chose to target him instead of someone else? Do you find anyone else scummy? What do you think of the late votes that went on BM yesterday, in response to the votes you received?

Lanaia: Name two people you would, without a doubt, lynch today.

L: why do you have such a low profile in this game? I barely realized you were playing. Why are you not more vocal and active? Scared? Scum? Bored?

Jackal58: I agreed with everything you said day 1, which is either really good or really bad. What are your thoughts right now? Who's scum?

VE: Where was that kill?

supersoft: Like sandro and Foolishness, I would like to see more activity from you too, from what I recall you are generally rather proactive with town affairs. What are your opinions?

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 16 2012 23:33 GMT
#1886
##vote Protactinium

On my phone; in short, massive slip. When the "day 1 summary" was posted by Protactinium, it suggested that there was pre-knowledge that the chaos was town-induced.
Note how Protactinium never questions that the people who pushed Palmar for lynch (WBG and other hardliners) were anything but town. It's not possible to make absolute generalizations like Protactinium is doing unless there's knowledge that those generalizations are true. That knowledge is only available to scum.

I'll post more about this shortly when I get comp access.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 00:00 GMT
#1907
Writing. Stumbled across this:

On January 17 2012 08:48 Jayjay54 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 08:45 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
Despite me going after Opz a bit here, today I still want us to lynch Macpo for all of the reasons before stated.


aren't you afraid that he actually IS a newbie town player? I mean stressing to be newb may be a newb mistake afterall.

Don't get me wrong, I'd lynch him, but IMO he might flip town.


what is that supposed to mean?

You would lynch him, but he might flip town?

Are you saying you would lynch him despite the fact that there's a non-negligible chance he might flip town? AKA you're willing to lynch someone who you are not confident about? Either that, or you're just stating the obvious.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 00:02 GMT
#1911
sandro, why did you go from "I don't want to lynch any of those guys" to immediately wanting Palmar dead less than five minutes later? (in your PMs with BC)
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 00:04 GMT
#1912
On January 17 2012 09:02 p4NDemik wrote:
Repeat. wherebugsgo: Why are you all of the sudden posting in 3rd person?


I omit pronouns sometimes, but I'm not speaking in the third person...how does that make me suspicious, exactly?

I'm not saying "wherebugsgo thinks x..." that just sounds retarded. Even the post that preceded your question had something in first person:

On January 17 2012 08:33 wherebugsgo wrote:
I'll post more about this shortly when I get comp access.


and again, how does this matter in finding scum, exactly?


wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 00:34 GMT
#1922
On January 17 2012 09:06 p4NDemik wrote:
People speaking in 3rd person is odd in all walks of life man.

You haven't done anything similar to this all game so I find it very strange.


I've never spoken in third person?

I've omitted pronouns, but again, that's not speaking in third person. When I'm on my phone I sometimes omit pronouns to type faster.

On January 17 2012 09:10 p4NDemik wrote:
And you referred to yourself in the 3rd person, even if you weren't narrating the entire post that was it is a marked diversion from how you were previously posting and I don't like it. I don't like it one bit I say!


Proof?

Just insert an "I" if there's a missing pronoun. I'm not narrating anything, I'm just lazy.

ex. "stumbled across X" vs "I stumbled across X" vs "wbg stumbled across x"

semantically, the first one has no subject (therefore no perspective), the second has the first person perspective, and the third has the third person perspective. I was using the first. That's just laziness, not strange.

Anyway I have no idea why I'm still talking about this lol. It's so pointless.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

I just lost a bunch of text cause I'm a retard. But, I'll summarize what I had as quickly as possible.

One thing that's confusing me about the Ciryandor flip is the way he interacted with other players day 1. At no point did I see he supported electing BM in thread, but he put his vote on BM anyway. He says later, when confronted about this, that he did it to prevent BC from being elected.

IMO, this furthers the notion that BM is either mafia or mafia wanted him in office and that Protac is mafia as well, because Ciryandor straight up said he preferred BM in office over BC. The sudden change of heart from Ciryandor to Macpo halfway through the day makes even more sense from a "Protac is scum" perspective, since it means he could get away with pushing the lynch onto someone other than a scumbuddy.

Ciryandor said he was also torn between Protactinium and sandro in office. Sandro quit halfway through the day to support BC, though he never voted in the vote thread. He originally also said he'd be willing to vote Ciryandor; if he wanted to kill Ciryandor, why did he not support Protac? Why was his mayoral campaign so weak?

The thing that can screw up all of this is if BC is scum too. In that case, all of the main candidates yesterday were scum and the scumteam could throw votes anywhere and get whatever the hell they wanted. However, I doubt this possibility, since even statistically it's unlikely. Personally I'm leaning townish on BC. I'll do some more rereading so as to make sure I don't have this backwards, but right now I really do think our best lynch is Protac.

Our second best lynch is probably someone like sandro or BM. Note how, despite being elected to office, BM has done nothing. He chose to jail Lanaia, which was honestly one of the dumbest choices he could make, particularly as, IIRC, he had a scum read on her. Lanaia actually even has a decent chance of flipping scum.

I say we lynch BM and Protac today. The Ciryandor interactions from yesterday make both likely to flip scum, although BM somewhat less so. I know no one is willing to lynch Scamp, and that's okay, but I actually think he's scum too.

Look at this little thing he says here:


On January 14 2012 01:59 Scamp wrote:
I'm automatically suspicious of anyone who complains about something and then doesn't do anything to try and help the problem.

Just sayin'...


Okay, so Scamp complains that I was wrong day 1 and that I should be accountable for it. He also complains, in his very next post:


On January 14 2012 08:08 Scamp wrote:
So far most of the candidates haven't put a lot of effort into this game.

It should be noted, once again, that the GF is selected after the mayoral elections. Thus mafia can send whoever they want at the elected spots, and if any veteran or suspicious day 1 players get elected then they can put the GF on someone else.


Likewise, Scamp has barely put any effort into the game as well.

Can anyone name one scumread Scamp had day 1?

Day 2?

Note here, he doesn't want attention:

On January 14 2012 16:02 Scamp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 15:41 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 14 2012 14:31 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
On January 14 2012 14:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&user=87086

bum I don't know what you see, but what about any of these posts has utility in any way shape or form for town?

In what world is Palmar "not 100% useless" in his current state?

None of his posts have breached one line and almost all of them have 0 content. He says Meapak is good, which isn't very helpful, he calls kita's (very valid concerns about his play, mind) dumb, he calls VE dumb and bad, he asks a noob how he knows his meta, and he wants to vote Protact because of a half-assed early game case on ciryandor.

If you seriously believe Palmar is not useless then I have to question your angle.


I feel like Palmar definitely hasn't been the most useless this day. Those who want to kill off Palmar based on his Meta should be waiting far past just day 1. I'm pretty sure everyone has had a day or two where they can't play much. Lynching Palmar at this point is like lynching a lurker.

@WBG -- What do you think about what Protactinium has posted?

How do you feel about Protactinium's new lynch candidate - BC?

I think its far to early in the game to solidly go after BC. I don't think he's scum just for addressing our rather useless mason role in the way he and I discussed it. I feel the move was solidly pro-town, but I won't trust him still. I never trust BC, L, Incog, or RoL (as evidenced by my repeated murders of RoL). But as of this moment I think he's decently protown, he created a different discussion that needed to be discussed. I will not support any attempts at lynching him day one.

Also, we haven't heard from quite a few people on our list of players, most notably L. I also don't think d3 has posted either, which is rather poor to me.
As for Palmar, I'll admit I'm seeing a difference, but I've seen this same argument against Palmar a few times. Everyone seems to attack him if he doesn't do his usual posting for mayor or what not. I'd rather he contribute more than what he has. As of right now I find him a very viable lynch candidate.

Hi Scamp, how are you, sir? Do you mind gracing me with a few opinions? Like Foolishness pushing for multiple people for mayor, instead of himself?( I still find that the most weird thing about today.) And also Protactinium saying he'd lynch BC if elected - a change from ciryandor.


Well alright, but first I question your post.

Why did the role of mason need to be discussed? Especially combined with a roleclaim? How is that solidly pro-town?

Also, when is a good time to solidly go after BC? Why can't someone go after him on day 1, especially if they have a case to make, and especially since you claim to never trust him?


I'm not really opposed to the idea of Foolishness pushing for multiple people and not himself. Last time I checked I'm not running for mayor either, and we elect two people. I find it curious that no one seems to be discussing the usage of the two positions outside of the day 1 lynch, whereas talk about masons cluttered up the thread for a bunch of pages.

Finally I'm not really sure why you're asking my opinion on Protactinium going after BC. He posted a pretty verbose argument, you should go pick that apart if you don't like it. My opinion of it is that I think it's legit, but I don't know if it's mafia calling out a notable townie with suspicious behavior because of substandard play (a common mafia Ace tactic, and a good one if that) or if BC truly is mafia and has done a good job of leading the town down topics which aren't quite to the point.

I guess they could both be town, too. Highly unlikely that they're both mafia, though.


He straight up says, "why are you asking me? Why don't you ask him? He looks like he wants to talk!"

What kind of person doesn't like attention, and doesn't want to talk much? A mafia person, of course.

After this, Scamp continues to do some weird shit. He complains that Protac hasn't posted anything useful (despite falling to his own vice), he randomly switches to voting L over mattchew for no apparent reason, or at least no explained reason, and then rejoices about the incoming round of modkills for whatever reason.

Insofar as uselessness goes, Scamp is still close to #1.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 00:43 GMT
#1926
On January 17 2012 09:38 Protactinium wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 08:20 Toadesstern wrote:
Sandroba was the guy who made BC lynch Palmar instead of whoever he wanted to lynch first

Show nested quote +
On January 16 2012 13:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Sandroba skype messages which will contain both game and unrelated game content.
+ Show Spoiler +

[13/01/2012 4:02:56 AM] Sandro Maculan: Yo james
[13/01/2012 4:03:14 AM] Sandro Maculan: I just got a pm saying you masoned me
[13/01/2012 4:03:59 AM] Sandro Maculan: -_-
[13/01/2012 4:04:09 AM] Sandro Maculan: going to bed ttyl
[13/01/2012 11:57:17 AM] james: rawrrrrr
[13/01/2012 11:57:22 AM] james: lol
[13/01/2012 11:57:33 AM] james: i wasn't up at like 4am, its all good
[13/01/2012 11:57:39 AM] james: i sent my pm and went to bed
[13/01/2012 1:19:40 PM] Sandro Maculan: hey you there?
[13/01/2012 1:19:43 PM] Sandro Maculan: just woke up
[13/01/2012 1:20:00 PM] james: that I am
[13/01/2012 1:20:15 PM] james: I am now about to shoot myself in the foot, but well, i honestly think its needed
[13/01/2012 1:21:03 PM] Sandro Maculan: ?
[13/01/2012 1:21:07 PM] Sandro Maculan: i need to catch up
[13/01/2012 1:21:12 PM] Sandro Maculan: I'm on page 26
[13/01/2012 1:21:28 PM] james: oh, i am going to be using the mason mechanic
[13/01/2012 1:21:30 PM] Sandro Maculan: why did you choose to mason me so early btw?
[13/01/2012 1:21:31 PM] james: as a way to generate discussion
[13/01/2012 1:21:32 PM] james: tbh
[13/01/2012 1:21:41 PM] james: you are one of the few people I talk to frequently in games
[13/01/2012 1:21:42 PM] james: or about games
[13/01/2012 1:21:45 PM] james: in the last 6 months
[13/01/2012 1:21:55 PM] james: of anyone else you will have a better read on me than most
[13/01/2012 1:22:17 PM] Sandro Maculan: well you are a tricky one for me to read tbh
[13/01/2012 1:22:25 PM] Sandro Maculan: I somehow always think you are mafia
[13/01/2012 1:22:30 PM] james: most people do
[13/01/2012 1:22:31 PM] Sandro Maculan: unless you are not
[13/01/2012 1:22:32 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol
[13/01/2012 1:22:53 PM] Sandro Maculan: this game I'm leaning town on you so far -_-
[13/01/2012 1:23:21 PM] Sandro Maculan: based on something silly tbh
[13/01/2012 1:23:41 PM] Sandro Maculan: like when i was typing my post of mayor campaign
[13/01/2012 1:23:50 PM] Sandro Maculan: you wrote something similar
[13/01/2012 1:24:04 PM] Sandro Maculan: like "mafia I'm comming for you"lol
[13/01/2012 1:24:18 PM] james: lol
[13/01/2012 1:24:19 PM] james: well
[13/01/2012 1:24:24 PM] james: im pretty sure the post im writing now
[13/01/2012 1:24:32 PM] james: will make people far easier to read
[13/01/2012 1:24:37 PM] james: including myself
[13/01/2012 1:24:50 PM] Sandro Maculan: k let me read the thread brb
[13/01/2012 1:25:18 PM] james: i havent put it up yet
[13/01/2012 1:25:25 PM] james: but as I am doing it
[13/01/2012 1:25:26 PM] james: im claiming mason in thread
[13/01/2012 1:25:33 PM] james: not revealing that i mason'd to you yet however
[13/01/2012 1:25:46 PM] james: I am doing it purely to generate discussion and primarily get people like foolishness
[13/01/2012 1:25:50 PM] james: or palmar, etc...
[13/01/2012 1:25:53 PM] james: all the vets
[13/01/2012 1:25:54 PM] james: to post
[13/01/2012 1:25:57 PM] james: they have to
[13/01/2012 1:26:02 PM] james: failure to mucks them badly
[13/01/2012 1:26:17 PM] Sandro Maculan: why hide that you masoned me?
[13/01/2012 1:26:35 PM] james: I'm not claiming it in the post
[13/01/2012 1:26:46 PM] james: im using this post as my claim post
[13/01/2012 1:26:53 PM] james: and will say I mason'd you in a one after it
[13/01/2012 1:26:58 PM] james: which you can confirm
[13/01/2012 1:33:32 PM] james: brb going to check on my foodstuffs
[13/01/2012 1:34:53 PM] Sandro Maculan: k wait mafia can sub in all bgs
[13/01/2012 1:35:05 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol that fucking sucks
[13/01/2012 1:47:40 PM] james: and now to see how people
[13/01/2012 1:47:41 PM] james: take my claim
[13/01/2012 1:48:12 PM] Sandro Maculan: i can't find in the op
[13/01/2012 1:48:18 PM] Sandro Maculan: how many bgs there will be
[13/01/2012 1:48:21 PM] james: bgs
[13/01/2012 1:48:24 PM] james: there are 2
[13/01/2012 1:48:25 PM] james: it states 2
[13/01/2012 1:48:30 PM] james: and says mafia can sub in
[13/01/2012 1:48:33 PM] Sandro Maculan: i can only see mafia can sub in max 2
[13/01/2012 1:48:35 PM] james: 0 1 or 2
[13/01/2012 1:48:37 PM] Sandro Maculan: yeah
[13/01/2012 1:48:51 PM] Sandro Maculan: but where does it say it's 2 total?
[13/01/2012 1:49:05 PM] Sandro Maculan: if it's only 2 that's way too fucking imba
[13/01/2012 1:52:13 PM] james: worked fine in the lounge game
[13/01/2012 1:52:42 PM] Sandro Maculan: I'm going to incorporate jackal's plan
[13/01/2012 1:52:43 PM] Sandro Maculan: seems good
[13/01/2012 1:52:52 PM] Sandro Maculan: I'm going to lynch 1 or 0 bgs
[13/01/2012 1:54:11 PM] james: well, if i dont get elected ill prob be the day 1 lynch now, however
[13/01/2012 1:54:14 PM] james: if i'm not
[13/01/2012 1:54:19 PM] james: mafia get to have fun dealing with me
[13/01/2012 1:55:02 PM] Sandro Maculan: on one hand being mason prob makes you more likely to be mafia
[13/01/2012 1:55:17 PM] james: on the other
[13/01/2012 1:55:19 PM] james: if im town
[13/01/2012 1:55:19 PM] Sandro Maculan: on the other hand mafia isn't likely to claim that shit
[13/01/2012 1:55:27 PM] james: it limits what other masons can do
[13/01/2012 1:55:31 PM] james: as in if i die and flip blue
[13/01/2012 1:55:32 PM] james: other mafia go
[13/01/2012 1:55:41 PM] james: "oh shit if we mason we might die"
[13/01/2012 1:55:42 PM] Sandro Maculan: on an extra third alien hand it's you and you are crazy so who knows
[13/01/2012 1:55:51 PM] james: as i lower the possible pool
[13/01/2012 1:55:54 PM] james: im figuring
[13/01/2012 1:55:59 PM] james: there are 3-4 masons at most
[13/01/2012 1:56:03 PM] james: and at least 1 is red
[13/01/2012 1:56:17 PM] james: by outing myself now
[13/01/2012 1:56:22 PM] james: if i dont get elected
[13/01/2012 1:56:33 PM] james: mafia shooting me becomes annoying as it removes the cover
[13/01/2012 1:56:35 PM] james: they have for their player
[13/01/2012 1:56:43 PM] Sandro Maculan: I dunno about how many masons there are
[13/01/2012 1:56:45 PM] james: it also forces them potentially to waste a frame on me
[13/01/2012 1:56:48 PM] james: i dont know for sure
[13/01/2012 1:56:51 PM] james: im speculateing
[13/01/2012 1:56:55 PM] Sandro Maculan: fw wanted a pm game so maybe there is more
[13/01/2012 1:56:56 PM] james: I know fw took the lounge mafia setup
[13/01/2012 1:56:57 PM] Sandro Maculan: I would think
[13/01/2012 1:57:04 PM] james: and tweaked it slightly
[13/01/2012 1:57:45 PM] james: do you agree it is something people should have actively discussed however? I mean, with only a select group of players being able to pm others
[13/01/2012 1:58:04 PM] james: thats a huge amount of potential issues
[13/01/2012 1:58:06 PM] james: late game
[13/01/2012 1:58:12 PM] james: if its not dealt with early
[13/01/2012 1:58:43 PM] Sandro Maculan: we should keep discussion in thread as much as possible I agree
[13/01/2012 1:58:58 PM] Sandro Maculan: we can bump off ideas here and the post before you off me at night
[13/01/2012 1:59:00 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol
[13/01/2012 1:59:19 PM] james: lol
[13/01/2012 1:59:23 PM] james: why would I off you
[13/01/2012 1:59:36 PM] james: day 1 lynch on a complete asshole
[13/01/2012 1:59:39 PM] james: or scum player
[13/01/2012 2:14:38 PM] Sandro Maculan: man
[13/01/2012 2:14:51 PM] Sandro Maculan: this mason claim looks promissing
[13/01/2012 2:15:19 PM] Sandro Maculan: I think mason mass claim could work
[13/01/2012 2:15:34 PM] Sandro Maculan: mafia will have to claim it if they ever want to use it
[13/01/2012 2:15:43 PM] james: yep
[13/01/2012 2:16:04 PM] Sandro Maculan: and it will generate a lot of discussion
[13/01/2012 2:16:11 PM] james: the discussion is key
[13/01/2012 2:16:14 PM] james: you have to have an opinion on it
[13/01/2012 2:27:10 PM] Sandro Maculan: k I'm caught up
[13/01/2012 2:36:54 PM] james: its an annoying read
[13/01/2012 2:37:00 PM] james: like 6 pages popped up when i went to bed for 6 hours
[13/01/2012 2:41:34 PM] Sandro Maculan: k let's think for a bit
[13/01/2012 2:41:49 PM] Sandro Maculan: what can mafia do if masons massclaim
[13/01/2012 2:42:09 PM] Sandro Maculan: they can claim alongside with the other townies
[13/01/2012 2:42:11 PM] james: fuck ton more scruitiny
[13/01/2012 2:42:13 PM] james: of their actions
[13/01/2012 2:42:20 PM] Sandro Maculan: or hide their mason an never use it
[13/01/2012 2:42:20 PM] james: they can claim to be town
[13/01/2012 2:42:23 PM] james: and never use a mason use
[13/01/2012 2:42:31 PM] james: which prevents them from manipulating behind scenes
[13/01/2012 2:42:32 PM] Sandro Maculan: yeah
[13/01/2012 2:42:36 PM] james: or they claim mason
[13/01/2012 2:42:44 PM] james: and potentially die as everyone will be looking at us
[13/01/2012 2:42:45 PM] james: at all times
[13/01/2012 2:42:48 PM] Sandro Maculan: and honesttly
[13/01/2012 2:42:53 PM] Sandro Maculan: fuck masons
[13/01/2012 2:42:53 PM] james: as they will have the entire mason pool
[13/01/2012 2:42:56 PM] james: pretty much
[13/01/2012 2:43:05 PM] james: potentially there is the chance
[13/01/2012 2:43:06 PM] Sandro Maculan: it's not that important role to protect it from hits
[13/01/2012 2:43:08 PM] james: that every mason is town
[13/01/2012 2:43:17 PM] james: but how many townies
[13/01/2012 2:43:20 PM] james: can actually use it well?
[13/01/2012 2:43:32 PM] james: its such a high skill required role
[13/01/2012 2:43:33 PM] Sandro Maculan: yeah and it's nice and all
[13/01/2012 2:43:36 PM] james: and in its current form
[13/01/2012 2:43:38 PM] james: only benefits mafia
[13/01/2012 2:43:48 PM] Sandro Maculan: but I'd rather lose a mason than any other blue
[13/01/2012 2:44:01 PM] Sandro Maculan: so if mafia wants to waste kp on them be my guest
[13/01/2012 2:44:05 PM] james: pretty much
[13/01/2012 2:44:20 PM] Sandro Maculan: i don't see any drawbacks
[13/01/2012 2:44:21 PM] Sandro Maculan: aside from a possible mason witchunt
[13/01/2012 2:44:35 PM] james: why do people think
[13/01/2012 2:44:36 PM] james: im relying on my role
[13/01/2012 2:44:39 PM] james: to get elected?
[13/01/2012 2:44:42 PM] james: i already stated
[13/01/2012 2:44:45 PM] james: it doesnt matter if i do or dont
[13/01/2012 2:44:46 PM] Sandro Maculan: man
[13/01/2012 2:44:47 PM] james: rofl
[13/01/2012 2:44:53 PM] james: i never once said
[13/01/2012 2:44:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: if you are mafia fuck you
[13/01/2012 2:44:58 PM] james: "im not going to get elected
[13/01/2012 2:45:02 PM] james: vote for me cause im mason"
[13/01/2012 2:45:02 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'm almost sure you are town lol
[13/01/2012 2:45:11 PM] james: i do some ballsy shit as red
[13/01/2012 2:45:14 PM] james: i will give that to people
[13/01/2012 2:45:17 PM] james: but out myself
[13/01/2012 2:45:20 PM] james: so blatently
[13/01/2012 2:45:24 PM] james: and fuck my entire team over?
[13/01/2012 2:45:40 PM] james: theres no gain in that as im now so heavily in the spotlight
[13/01/2012 2:45:47 PM] james: i am now more likely to get offed by town
[13/01/2012 2:45:49 PM] Sandro Maculan: man
[13/01/2012 2:45:59 PM] Sandro Maculan: you would prob get elected either way
[13/01/2012 2:46:06 PM] Sandro Maculan: why would you ever do this as mafia
[13/01/2012 2:46:08 PM] james: yea
[13/01/2012 2:46:11 PM] james: also
[13/01/2012 2:46:13 PM] james: cybercheese
[13/01/2012 2:46:15 PM] james: and toad
[13/01/2012 2:46:16 PM] Sandro Maculan: -_-
[13/01/2012 2:46:17 PM] james: are shifty as fuck
[13/01/2012 2:46:22 PM] james: -_- responses to my
[13/01/2012 2:46:23 PM] james: claim
[13/01/2012 2:46:27 PM] james: are exactly the shit i was hoping for
[13/01/2012 2:46:28 PM] Sandro Maculan: i like the ciryandor case
[13/01/2012 2:46:47 PM] Sandro Maculan: cyber seems shifty too
[13/01/2012 2:46:48 PM] james: i want to see ciryandor post more
[13/01/2012 2:46:50 PM] james: tbh
[13/01/2012 2:46:54 PM] james: because he seems red
[13/01/2012 2:46:57 PM] james: but due to such shitty play
[13/01/2012 2:47:02 PM] james: most likely a red will coach him
[13/01/2012 2:47:03 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'm actually okay with toad
[13/01/2012 2:47:06 PM] james: to make him sound not terrible
[13/01/2012 2:47:15 PM] james: and gives me a read on his coach
[13/01/2012 2:47:16 PM] james: lol
[13/01/2012 2:47:22 PM] james: palmar shouldn't be this apathetic
[13/01/2012 2:47:24 PM] james: as a townie
[13/01/2012 2:47:38 PM] Sandro Maculan: well his saving grace is agreeing with proact
[13/01/2012 2:47:46 PM] Sandro Maculan: which i also agree
[13/01/2012 2:47:58 PM] Sandro Maculan: but yeah he needs to step up
[13/01/2012 2:48:16 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'll give him time to do it on his own before I push for him
[13/01/2012 2:48:34 PM] Sandro Maculan: he usually gets to posting midway through day1 if he is town
[13/01/2012 2:52:42 PM] james: yea
[13/01/2012 2:52:44 PM] james: this is true
[13/01/2012 3:04:25 PM] Sandro Maculan: brb
[13/01/2012 3:26:29 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol shit
[13/01/2012 3:26:40 PM] Sandro Maculan: man why don't epople think like i do
[13/01/2012 3:28:57 PM] james: bum saw
[13/01/2012 3:29:05 PM] james: exactly the reason why id be nervous of red masons
[13/01/2012 3:29:07 PM] james: from OP
[13/01/2012 3:29:29 PM] Sandro Maculan: typing a post sec
[13/01/2012 3:41:10 PM] Sandro Maculan: and why is that
[13/01/2012 3:42:13 PM] james: they choose
[13/01/2012 3:42:31 PM] james: if they fail to by end of day 1
[13/01/2012 3:42:34 PM] james: its random'd
[13/01/2012 3:43:08 PM] Sandro Maculan: prb not an issue though
[13/01/2012 3:43:16 PM] Sandro Maculan: why would they ever fail to choose it
[13/01/2012 3:43:32 PM] james: exactly
[13/01/2012 3:43:33 PM] james: lol
[13/01/2012 3:44:46 PM] Sandro Maculan: i think mafia would prob have their mason(s) selected soon
[13/01/2012 3:45:22 PM] Sandro Maculan: and if this movement gets strong they will quickly mason someone
[13/01/2012 3:46:48 PM] james: yea
[13/01/2012 3:46:50 PM] james: they will have to
[13/01/2012 3:47:31 PM] Sandro Maculan: fuck man i'm liking this plan more and more
[13/01/2012 3:47:43 PM] james: i was thinking on it last night
[13/01/2012 3:47:45 PM] james: and like
[13/01/2012 3:47:50 PM] james: I could die because of it
[13/01/2012 3:47:58 PM] james: but its still so solid
[13/01/2012 3:47:59 PM] james: for town
[13/01/2012 3:48:06 PM] james: my death to fuck mafia in the ass with a rake?
[13/01/2012 3:48:12 PM] james: seems legit trade with 40 townies
[13/01/2012 3:49:14 PM] Sandro Maculan: nah man
[13/01/2012 3:49:28 PM] james: there are enough big namers
[13/01/2012 3:49:29 PM] Sandro Maculan: i won't let anyone important get lynched day1
[13/01/2012 3:49:30 PM] james: in this game
[13/01/2012 3:49:37 PM] james: well i could easily get shot'
[13/01/2012 3:49:38 PM] james: as well
[13/01/2012 3:49:40 PM] Sandro Maculan: look at what happened last huge game
[13/01/2012 3:49:47 PM] james: -_- i was so wrong
[13/01/2012 3:49:49 PM] james: that game
[13/01/2012 3:49:52 PM] james: except on a few gut shot reads
[13/01/2012 3:49:56 PM] Sandro Maculan: mafia raped all vets night 1
[13/01/2012 3:50:50 PM] Sandro Maculan: we have to wait a bit for them to thin out / get medic ' ed etc before going into that pool
[13/01/2012 3:50:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: it's the best play
[13/01/2012 3:51:39 PM] james: i didnt see any downsides
[13/01/2012 3:51:50 PM] james: then again i could be missing a giant hole somewhere
[13/01/2012 3:59:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: nah I've thought it through
[13/01/2012 4:00:00 PM] Sandro Maculan: there are no holes
[13/01/2012 4:14:36 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol you seem quite popular now
[13/01/2012 4:19:42 PM] james: haha
[13/01/2012 4:19:43 PM] james: apparently
[14/01/2012 1:24:40 AM] Sandro Maculan: yo
[14/01/2012 1:24:45 AM] Sandro Maculan: I'm back you here?
[14/01/2012 1:24:54 AM] james: yea typing up a post now
[14/01/2012 1:25:21 AM] Sandro Maculan: I'm catching up
[14/01/2012 1:25:25 AM] Sandro Maculan: still on page 40
[14/01/2012 1:25:29 AM] Sandro Maculan: and quite drunk
[14/01/2012 1:26:16 AM] Sandro Maculan: wow
[14/01/2012 1:26:25 AM] Sandro Maculan: proactinum thinks you are scum
[14/01/2012 1:26:34 AM] Sandro Maculan: are you mafia?
[14/01/2012 1:26:44 AM] Sandro Maculan: tell me I wont remember tomorrow
[14/01/2012 1:26:52 AM] Sandro Maculan: i promise not to check logs
[14/01/2012 1:27:17 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 1:27:17 AM] james: im not
[14/01/2012 1:27:19 AM] james: protrac
[14/01/2012 1:27:22 AM] james: just outed himself
[14/01/2012 1:27:23 AM] james: hard
[14/01/2012 1:27:23 AM] james: though
[14/01/2012 1:27:27 AM] james: so fucking obvious
[14/01/2012 1:27:41 AM] james: i say this because
[14/01/2012 1:27:42 AM] Sandro Maculan: I really thought he was town though
[14/01/2012 1:27:45 AM] james: if anyone thinks thats mystlord
[14/01/2012 1:27:47 AM] james: they are dumb as hell
[14/01/2012 1:27:48 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 1:27:52 AM] Sandro Maculan: from his frist post and second
[14/01/2012 1:28:03 AM] james: the post against me
[14/01/2012 1:28:05 AM] james: is incog
[14/01/2012 1:28:11 AM] james: and incog is firmly in
[14/01/2012 1:28:15 AM] james: the anti pm bandwagon
[14/01/2012 1:28:15 AM] james: for town
[14/01/2012 1:28:22 AM] Sandro Maculan: no
[14/01/2012 1:28:25 AM] james: no i mean
[14/01/2012 1:28:27 AM] Sandro Maculan: he is against the anti pm
[14/01/2012 1:28:29 AM] james: if you talk to him
[14/01/2012 1:28:33 AM] james: outside of this game
[14/01/2012 1:28:35 AM] Sandro Maculan: he thinkis you are for it
[14/01/2012 1:28:37 AM] james: he hates pm
[14/01/2012 1:28:39 AM] Sandro Maculan: and thus mafia
[14/01/2012 1:28:45 AM] james: which is how he outed himself
[14/01/2012 1:28:54 AM] james: his belief in people properly using pms
[14/01/2012 1:28:55 AM] james: is fucking horrid
[14/01/2012 1:29:02 AM] james: fw
[14/01/2012 1:29:04 AM] james: and I
[14/01/2012 1:29:06 AM] james: are the top 2 people
[14/01/2012 1:29:08 AM] james: who like pms
[14/01/2012 1:29:08 AM] Sandro Maculan: man
[14/01/2012 1:29:13 AM] Sandro Maculan: this discussion
[14/01/2012 1:29:13 AM] james: in general
[14/01/2012 1:29:15 AM] james: i hate masons
[14/01/2012 1:29:19 AM] Sandro Maculan: is fucking useless day1
[14/01/2012 1:29:21 AM] james: nah
[14/01/2012 1:29:24 AM] james: incog
[14/01/2012 1:29:25 AM] james: just
[14/01/2012 1:29:26 AM] james: outed himself
[14/01/2012 1:29:29 AM] Sandro Maculan: maybe he is mafia for not realising that
[14/01/2012 1:29:31 AM] james: to me anyway
[14/01/2012 1:29:35 AM] james: to me
[14/01/2012 1:29:39 AM] james: thats a hugeeeee
[14/01/2012 1:29:39 AM] Sandro Maculan: vets are going to get shot the fuck out
[14/01/2012 1:29:40 AM] james: bit
[14/01/2012 1:29:41 AM] james: also
[14/01/2012 1:29:42 AM] Sandro Maculan: fast
[14/01/2012 1:29:43 AM] james: adam
[14/01/2012 1:29:45 AM] james: + wbg
[14/01/2012 1:29:48 AM] james: link to protrac
[14/01/2012 1:29:51 AM] james: so does ciryandor
[14/01/2012 1:29:55 AM] Sandro Maculan: ?
[14/01/2012 1:29:57 AM] james: do i think all are red? no
[14/01/2012 1:29:59 AM] james: but they all link
[14/01/2012 1:30:08 AM] james: protrac has done nothing to garner votes
[14/01/2012 1:30:09 AM] james: but tunnel people
[14/01/2012 1:30:09 AM] Sandro Maculan: man
[14/01/2012 1:30:12 AM] Sandro Maculan: protact
[14/01/2012 1:30:16 AM] james: first people to jump on his nuts
[14/01/2012 1:30:20 AM] Sandro Maculan: if he is mafia he has balls
[14/01/2012 1:30:20 AM] james: with 0 grounds
[14/01/2012 1:30:23 AM] james: well
[14/01/2012 1:30:25 AM] james: it is incog
[14/01/2012 1:30:29 AM] Sandro Maculan: he is the most out there mothefucker
[14/01/2012 1:30:45 AM] Sandro Maculan: you + him are my strongest town reads atm
[14/01/2012 1:30:55 AM] Sandro Maculan: balss =/= mafia
[14/01/2012 1:31:23 AM] Sandro Maculan: even you when red you play more conservatively
[14/01/2012 1:31:31 AM] Sandro Maculan: of course i can be fooled and mistaken
[14/01/2012 1:31:38 AM] Sandro Maculan: but i gotta go with my guts
[14/01/2012 1:31:49 AM] Sandro Maculan: and they say you plus him are town right now
[14/01/2012 1:38:25 AM] james: i appreciate that, I now have to dig
[14/01/2012 1:38:29 AM] james: through friggen aim logs
[14/01/2012 1:38:29 AM] james: on incog
[14/01/2012 1:38:32 AM] james: fuuuuck
[14/01/2012 1:39:20 AM] Sandro Maculan: ?
[14/01/2012 1:39:29 AM] james: to quote his view
[14/01/2012 1:39:30 AM] james: of pms
[14/01/2012 1:39:31 AM] Sandro Maculan: he masoned you too?\
[14/01/2012 1:40:00 AM] Sandro Maculan: just made a beatiful post
[14/01/2012 1:40:02 AM] Sandro Maculan: I'm quite proud of it
[14/01/2012 1:59:06 AM] james: the obvious drunk post?
[14/01/2012 1:59:17 AM] Sandro Maculan: man
[14/01/2012 1:59:23 AM] Sandro Maculan: it all makes sense
[14/01/2012 1:59:33 AM] Sandro Maculan: being drunk is very enlightening
[14/01/2012 2:00:13 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:00:28 AM] Sandro Maculan: seriously
[14/01/2012 2:00:29 AM] james: more like it makes everything more fun
[14/01/2012 2:00:57 AM] Sandro Maculan: are you still playing lol btw?
[14/01/2012 2:01:05 AM] james: eh not really
[14/01/2012 2:01:08 AM] Sandro Maculan: been some time since i last messed with it
[14/01/2012 2:01:08 AM] james: star wars has stolen my time
[14/01/2012 2:01:18 AM] Sandro Maculan: haven't had the time
[14/01/2012 2:01:23 AM] james: play so much star wars now
[14/01/2012 2:01:33 AM] Sandro Maculan: man
[14/01/2012 2:01:48 AM] Sandro Maculan: I'm studying human behavior
[14/01/2012 2:01:54 AM] james: that sounds useful
[14/01/2012 2:02:04 AM] Sandro Maculan: and chicks were never that easy
[14/01/2012 2:02:27 AM] Sandro Maculan: I'm lacking time to foucs on other shit
[14/01/2012 2:03:03 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:03:05 AM] james: chicks are dumb
[14/01/2012 2:03:11 AM] james: booze = make them easy
[14/01/2012 2:03:29 AM] Sandro Maculan: nah man
[14/01/2012 2:03:33 AM] Sandro Maculan: they are like dogs
[14/01/2012 2:03:40 AM] Sandro Maculan: they respond to standard shit
[14/01/2012 2:03:58 AM] Sandro Maculan: if you behave a certain way they jump on you
[14/01/2012 2:05:21 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:05:28 AM] james: and sandro is manipulating teh womenzorz
[14/01/2012 2:05:32 AM] james: to spread legs
[14/01/2012 2:07:05 AM] Sandro Maculan: it's pretty exciting if you ask me
[14/01/2012 2:07:14 AM] james: hahaha
[14/01/2012 2:07:15 AM] james: aye
[14/01/2012 2:07:18 AM] Sandro Maculan: =P
[14/01/2012 2:08:15 AM] Sandro Maculan: man where the fuck is l
[14/01/2012 2:08:23 AM] Sandro Maculan: is he supposed to be really good?
[14/01/2012 2:08:26 AM] Sandro Maculan: isn't
[14/01/2012 2:09:02 AM] Sandro Maculan: fucking mafia always kills me b4 i get a chance to do anything
[14/01/2012 2:10:53 AM] james: L is an oldschool vet
[14/01/2012 2:10:59 AM] james: who is usually meh town
[14/01/2012 2:11:02 AM] james: and solid mafia
[14/01/2012 2:11:05 AM] james: the thing is
[14/01/2012 2:11:06 AM] james: in this setup
[14/01/2012 2:11:13 AM] james: the only people who excel at pms
[14/01/2012 2:11:22 AM] james: would all fuck town sideways as red
[14/01/2012 2:11:23 AM] james: in pms
[14/01/2012 2:11:36 AM] james: if anyone of them is red, regardless of who the red mason is
[14/01/2012 2:11:41 AM] james: pms can be easy crafted
[14/01/2012 2:11:46 AM] Sandro Maculan: who would those be?
[14/01/2012 2:12:05 AM] james: incog, myself, meapak should be able to, L
[14/01/2012 2:12:06 AM] Sandro Maculan: only you and rafiled have fucked me over pms so far
[14/01/2012 2:12:09 AM] james: bum should be able to
[14/01/2012 2:12:21 AM] james: d3 should be able to
[14/01/2012 2:12:26 AM] Sandro Maculan: d3?
[14/01/2012 2:12:33 AM] james: d3_crentia
[14/01/2012 2:12:37 AM] james: hes played for ages]
[14/01/2012 2:12:39 AM] Sandro Maculan: never heard of him
[14/01/2012 2:12:42 AM] james: was in the latest lounge mafia game
[14/01/2012 2:12:49 AM] james: where he got manhandeled in pms
[14/01/2012 2:12:51 AM] james: and irl
[14/01/2012 2:12:56 AM] james: by his betters
[14/01/2012 2:13:01 AM] james: but his ability to play
[14/01/2012 2:13:05 AM] james: is far above most of tls members
[14/01/2012 2:13:06 AM] Sandro Maculan: man
[14/01/2012 2:13:16 AM] Sandro Maculan: i think you have to really like being mafia to be good at it
[14/01/2012 2:13:29 AM] james: at pm manipulation?
[14/01/2012 2:13:36 AM] Sandro Maculan: like when i roll mafia I feel like giving up
[14/01/2012 2:13:38 AM] james: the "core" group of vets
[14/01/2012 2:13:42 AM] Sandro Maculan: like mafia xlviii
[14/01/2012 2:13:43 AM] james: who can manipulate learned it
[14/01/2012 2:13:52 AM] james: via testing eachother like mad
[14/01/2012 2:13:54 AM] james: in pm circles
[14/01/2012 2:13:54 AM] Sandro Maculan: i don't even like winning as mafia
[14/01/2012 2:13:56 AM] james: to play find the red
[14/01/2012 2:14:00 AM] Sandro Maculan: doesn't feel as good
[14/01/2012 2:14:05 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:14:10 AM] james: i like proving
[14/01/2012 2:14:15 AM] james: tl towns are bad when im red
[14/01/2012 2:14:22 AM] james: since tl towns win a game using shitty reasoning
[14/01/2012 2:14:24 AM] Sandro Maculan: i like proving they are good!
[14/01/2012 2:14:27 AM] Sandro Maculan: =P
[14/01/2012 2:14:33 AM] james: and keep doing it because it fluked once
[14/01/2012 2:14:35 AM] james: or twice
[14/01/2012 2:14:38 AM] james: then a vet come sin
[14/01/2012 2:14:40 AM] james: and goes
[14/01/2012 2:14:44 AM] james: "rawrrrr raped you hard"
[14/01/2012 2:14:57 AM] james: then town doesnt learn -_-
[14/01/2012 2:14:58 AM] james: other than
[14/01/2012 2:15:00 AM] james: vets = op
[14/01/2012 2:15:01 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:15:03 AM] Sandro Maculan: hmm you hurt my ego by saying that
[14/01/2012 2:15:10 AM] james: your an exception
[14/01/2012 2:15:14 AM] james: but like
[14/01/2012 2:15:16 AM] Sandro Maculan: i like to think we are pretty decent =P
[14/01/2012 2:15:18 AM] james: you can see what I mean right?
[14/01/2012 2:15:25 AM] james: that faultly reasoning is getting used
[14/01/2012 2:15:27 AM] james: frequently
[14/01/2012 2:15:30 AM] james: by the same people?
[14/01/2012 2:15:37 AM] Sandro Maculan: yeah i ignore 80% of people's opinions in game
[14/01/2012 2:15:53 AM] Sandro Maculan: some players i don't even bother to read what they post
[14/01/2012 2:16:04 AM] Sandro Maculan: but there are some that i can really tell apart
[14/01/2012 2:16:34 AM] Sandro Maculan: if you are bad as town it feels like it's too easy to be mafia
[14/01/2012 2:16:44 AM] Sandro Maculan: cuz no one expects any better from you
[14/01/2012 2:17:07 AM] Sandro Maculan: so whenever i roll mafia it's like a burden
[14/01/2012 2:17:25 AM] Sandro Maculan: and when i roll town it's like vacations =)
[14/01/2012 2:18:17 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:18:23 AM] james: i view being mafia a challenge
[14/01/2012 2:18:37 AM] james: and honestly have learned more by being red
[14/01/2012 2:18:38 AM] Sandro Maculan: dunno
[14/01/2012 2:18:39 AM] james: than from town
[14/01/2012 2:18:43 AM] Sandro Maculan: i view town as a challenge
[14/01/2012 2:18:50 AM] Sandro Maculan: nailing scum feels so good
[14/01/2012 2:18:55 AM] james: oh it does
[14/01/2012 2:19:01 AM] james: pyp3 was the more infuriating / gratifying experience
[14/01/2012 2:19:04 AM] james: i have had as town
[14/01/2012 2:19:07 AM] james: nailed every red
[14/01/2012 2:19:10 AM] james: traitor
[14/01/2012 2:19:12 AM] james: and both sk's
[14/01/2012 2:19:23 AM] Sandro Maculan: yeah you feel like a boss\
[14/01/2012 2:19:37 AM] Sandro Maculan: most games i do okay
[14/01/2012 2:19:59 AM] Sandro Maculan: I get good day1 reads and after i realise I was right i fell so good
[14/01/2012 2:20:03 AM] Sandro Maculan: it's awesome
[14/01/2012 2:20:18 AM] Sandro Maculan: when mafia i just feel people were fools not to catch me
[14/01/2012 2:21:00 AM] james: eh
[14/01/2012 2:21:13 AM] james: im always surprised when im not catched
[14/01/2012 2:21:18 AM] james: although My style ensures i die
[14/01/2012 2:21:19 AM] james: always
[14/01/2012 2:21:57 AM] Sandro Maculan: next time i roll mafia
[14/01/2012 2:22:12 AM] Sandro Maculan: I'm going to be the summiest mofo on earth and not give a fuck
[14/01/2012 2:22:49 AM] Sandro Maculan: like my first games i didn't care what people would think
[14/01/2012 2:23:40 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:23:44 AM] james: good policy
[14/01/2012 2:23:58 AM] Sandro Maculan: man seriously
[14/01/2012 2:24:07 AM] Sandro Maculan: why would people not vote for me
[14/01/2012 2:24:21 AM] james: your not being the typical convincing roba
[14/01/2012 2:24:22 AM] Sandro Maculan: so far i got like 1 vote
[14/01/2012 2:24:25 AM] james: you appear really halfassed
[14/01/2012 2:24:27 AM] james: so far in thread
[14/01/2012 2:24:31 AM] Sandro Maculan: lol
[14/01/2012 2:24:37 AM] Sandro Maculan: that's the typical me
[14/01/2012 2:24:43 AM] james: or that you are making the round of running for office
[14/01/2012 2:24:45 AM] Sandro Maculan: i don't care for walls
[14/01/2012 2:24:46 AM] james: with 0 effort
[14/01/2012 2:24:47 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:27:53 AM] Sandro Maculan: hmmm
[14/01/2012 2:28:07 AM] Sandro Maculan: i think i put in effort when it's needed
[14/01/2012 2:28:10 AM] Sandro Maculan: i don't like discussing random shit that leads nowhere
[14/01/2012 2:29:26 AM] james: didnt you use to post more, or is it that we just talk alot that i assume you do? lol
[14/01/2012 2:29:37 AM] james: also brb
[14/01/2012 2:30:44 AM] Sandro Maculan: the time i dedicate to mafia is proportional of the time I'm at home doing nothing
[14/01/2012 2:30:59 AM] Sandro Maculan: so yeah when there is less good shit to do i post more
[14/01/2012 2:32:15 AM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 2:48:59 AM] james: that post was more boss
[14/01/2012 2:49:54 AM] Sandro Maculan: =)
[14/01/2012 2:56:32 AM] Sandro Maculan: fuck palmar man
[14/01/2012 2:56:37 AM] Sandro Maculan: he is taking too long
[14/01/2012 2:56:44 AM] Sandro Maculan: maybe he is mafia
[14/01/2012 2:58:08 AM] james: hes realllllly apathetic this game
[14/01/2012 2:58:10 AM] james: for some reason
[14/01/2012 2:58:12 AM] james: not like gms game
[14/01/2012 2:58:13 AM] james: at all
[14/01/2012 3:00:28 AM] Sandro Maculan: rofl
[14/01/2012 3:00:34 AM] Sandro Maculan: did you watch
[14/01/2012 3:00:48 AM] Sandro Maculan: the uszat dude interviewing players?
[14/01/2012 3:06:28 AM] james: nope
[14/01/2012 3:06:33 AM] james: i rarely watch streams or vids on tl now
[14/01/2012 3:06:52 AM] Sandro Maculan: rfo
[14/01/2012 3:07:00 AM] james: rfo?
[14/01/2012 3:07:13 AM] Sandro Maculan: rofl
[14/01/2012 3:07:15 AM] Sandro Maculan: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=303115#6
[14/01/2012 3:07:20 AM] Sandro Maculan: watch this
[14/01/2012 3:07:26 AM] Sandro Maculan: will not dissapoint
[14/01/2012 3:14:15 AM] james: thats carmac trolling people? rofl
[14/01/2012 3:14:55 AM] james: or someone that carmac
[14/01/2012 3:14:59 AM] james: just found vids of?
[14/01/2012 3:37:35 AM] james: and heading to bed, ttyl
[14/01/2012 3:06:50 PM] Sandro Maculan: man I have 1 hour before i go out again and need to catch up
[14/01/2012 3:06:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: you here?
[14/01/2012 3:07:17 PM] james: -_-
[14/01/2012 3:07:18 PM] james: ve claimed jack
[14/01/2012 3:07:24 PM] james: mattchew was modkilled
[14/01/2012 3:07:25 PM] james: for being a dumbfuck
[14/01/2012 3:07:32 PM] james: we are no where closer to getting shit solved
[14/01/2012 3:07:38 PM] Sandro Maculan: I', still on page 50 =(
[14/01/2012 3:07:45 PM] Sandro Maculan: and don't quite remember last night
[14/01/2012 3:07:51 PM] james: you were kinda drunk
[14/01/2012 3:07:54 PM] james: drunk man mc drunk
[14/01/2012 3:08:01 PM] Sandro Maculan: i was kinda totally drunk
[14/01/2012 3:08:05 PM] Sandro Maculan: out of my mind
[14/01/2012 3:08:06 PM] Sandro Maculan: =P
[14/01/2012 3:08:16 PM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 3:08:21 PM] james: thats not normal?
[14/01/2012 3:08:37 PM] Sandro Maculan: it's quite standard for my weekends =P
[14/01/2012 3:08:45 PM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 3:08:46 PM] Sandro Maculan: i do enjoy my vodka
[14/01/2012 3:12:09 PM] Sandro Maculan: who are you lynching btw
[14/01/2012 3:12:36 PM] Sandro Maculan: i need to vote cuz i won't have the time later
[14/01/2012 3:17:17 PM] james: most likely incog
[14/01/2012 3:17:21 PM] james: unless someone fucks up in thread
[14/01/2012 3:17:23 PM] james: between now and then
[14/01/2012 3:17:32 PM] james: 3 posts since the start of a game day
[14/01/2012 3:17:34 PM] james: is inexcusable
[14/01/2012 3:17:34 PM] Sandro Maculan: -_-
[14/01/2012 3:17:40 PM] Sandro Maculan: then I'm not voting for you
[14/01/2012 3:17:50 PM] james: where 1 was a purposeful misrepresentation of facts
[14/01/2012 3:17:55 PM] james: and continued a discussion round me
[14/01/2012 3:17:57 PM] Sandro Maculan: it's quite silly to lynch him day1 man
[14/01/2012 3:17:59 PM] james: as opposed to around masons
[14/01/2012 3:18:00 PM] james: eh
[14/01/2012 3:18:09 PM] james: take you rpick, its him or foolishness
[14/01/2012 3:18:11 PM] Sandro Maculan: and he ddoesn't seem to give a fuck
[14/01/2012 3:18:14 PM] james: both are performing badly
[14/01/2012 3:18:16 PM] james: there are 2
[14/01/2012 3:18:17 PM] Sandro Maculan: which is a townie trait
[14/01/2012 3:18:17 PM] james: fucking people
[14/01/2012 3:18:18 PM] james: on
[14/01/2012 3:18:19 PM] james: 1
[14/01/2012 3:18:20 PM] james: account
[14/01/2012 3:18:27 PM] james: 3 posts
[14/01/2012 3:18:30 PM] james: is totaly inexcusable
[14/01/2012 3:18:38 PM] Sandro Maculan: well sure
[14/01/2012 3:18:51 PM] Sandro Maculan: let's give him one more day and watch him closely
[14/01/2012 3:18:52 PM] james: given that he has not contributed anything and is solely being disruptive?
[14/01/2012 3:19:00 PM] james: and foolishness? who openly admitted
[14/01/2012 3:19:02 PM] Sandro Maculan: lynching him day1 is an statistical mistake
[14/01/2012 3:19:07 PM] james: that he wants a mayor in power
[14/01/2012 3:19:08 PM] james: that he can manipulate?
[14/01/2012 3:19:19 PM] Sandro Maculan: man even so
[14/01/2012 3:19:28 PM] Sandro Maculan: that's not something mafia would say openly
[14/01/2012 3:19:36 PM] Sandro Maculan: it's like your claim
[14/01/2012 3:19:46 PM] Sandro Maculan: it draws suspcion onto you
[14/01/2012 3:19:51 PM] Sandro Maculan: which makes you less likely mafia
[14/01/2012 3:20:22 PM] james: foolishness
[14/01/2012 3:20:24 PM] james: didnt say it openly
[14/01/2012 3:20:26 PM] james: he said it in pms
[14/01/2012 3:20:28 PM] Sandro Maculan: let's wait for day 2 to lynch those guys
[14/01/2012 3:20:29 PM] james: and his mason
[14/01/2012 3:20:32 PM] james: gave out the pms
[14/01/2012 3:20:45 PM] Sandro Maculan: chances are if they are town mafia will shoot them regardless of how suspicious they are
[14/01/2012 3:20:46 PM] james: had mattchew not shared his pms before modkilled
[14/01/2012 3:20:48 PM] james: no one would have known
[14/01/2012 3:20:51 PM] james: possibly
[14/01/2012 3:21:01 PM] james: near no one has posted though
[14/01/2012 3:21:07 PM] james: primarily only known names
[14/01/2012 3:21:11 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'm guilty of that too
[14/01/2012 3:21:16 PM] Sandro Maculan: i have no time on weekends
[14/01/2012 3:21:48 PM] james: haha
[14/01/2012 3:21:58 PM] james: of the people who have posted day 1
[14/01/2012 3:22:02 PM] james: both of them are the most suspicious to me
[14/01/2012 3:22:06 PM] james: palmar is a handicap
[14/01/2012 3:22:10 PM] james: kurumi is trolling
[14/01/2012 3:22:15 PM] james: as kurumi always does
[14/01/2012 3:22:27 PM] james: the only "neutral" lynch i have is him
[14/01/2012 3:22:29 PM] james: for doing fuck all
[14/01/2012 3:22:31 PM] Sandro Maculan: kurumi trolls way less as mafia
[14/01/2012 3:22:39 PM] Sandro Maculan: it's a pretty good tell on him
[14/01/2012 3:22:40 PM] james: the only troll i abide by
[14/01/2012 3:22:42 PM] james: is chez
[14/01/2012 3:22:43 PM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 3:22:46 PM] Sandro Maculan: sure
[14/01/2012 3:22:48 PM] james: he actually contributes
[14/01/2012 3:22:51 PM] james: as a troll
[14/01/2012 3:23:10 PM] Sandro Maculan: kurumi is disrupitive, but if he is trolling a lot chances are he is town
[14/01/2012 3:24:00 PM] Sandro Maculan: we have to lynch not likely day1 targets
[14/01/2012 3:24:15 PM] Sandro Maculan: like cc and ciry
[14/01/2012 3:24:30 PM] Sandro Maculan: high chance to flip mafia and low chance to get shot if town
[14/01/2012 3:24:39 PM] Sandro Maculan: and we have to deal with them at some point
[14/01/2012 3:26:13 PM] james: eeh both have high chances
[14/01/2012 3:26:19 PM] james: of being shot
[14/01/2012 3:26:20 PM] james: atm imo
[14/01/2012 3:27:04 PM] Sandro Maculan: being shot by who?
[14/01/2012 3:27:06 PM] Sandro Maculan: vigis?
[14/01/2012 3:27:34 PM] Sandro Maculan: dunno vigis normally like to save it for later
[14/01/2012 3:28:34 PM] james: ve claims hes shooting cc
[14/01/2012 3:28:36 PM] james: or was anyway
[14/01/2012 3:31:51 PM] Sandro Maculan: what
[14/01/2012 3:32:05 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'm still on page 58
[14/01/2012 3:32:15 PM] Sandro Maculan: why did he claim who he is shooting
[14/01/2012 3:32:23 PM] Sandro Maculan: and why did he claim in the first palce?
[14/01/2012 3:33:36 PM] Sandro Maculan: rofl
[14/01/2012 3:33:40 PM] Sandro Maculan: seriously
[14/01/2012 3:33:49 PM] Sandro Maculan: he cclaims jack and doesn't eve know how it works
[14/01/2012 3:33:52 PM] Sandro Maculan: -_-
[14/01/2012 3:35:43 PM] Sandro Maculan: I want to vote for you cuz i don't really like the other options besides protact
[14/01/2012 3:35:44 PM] james: yea
[14/01/2012 3:35:47 PM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 3:35:48 PM] james: see
[14/01/2012 3:35:53 PM] Sandro Maculan: but he wants to lynch you and you him
[14/01/2012 3:35:57 PM] james: eh
[14/01/2012 3:36:02 PM] james: i have a list of like 4 people
[14/01/2012 3:36:03 PM] Sandro Maculan: that's dumb as fuck =P
[14/01/2012 3:36:04 PM] james: id lynch
[14/01/2012 3:36:06 PM] james: tbh
[14/01/2012 3:36:10 PM] james: he went for me
[14/01/2012 3:36:14 PM] james: on the shadiest shit
[14/01/2012 3:36:15 PM] james: in the world
[14/01/2012 3:36:19 PM] james: incog reads the OP's
[14/01/2012 3:36:21 PM] james: carefully
[14/01/2012 3:36:23 PM] james: and he misread it
[14/01/2012 3:36:28 PM] james: needed to pull a post I made
[14/01/2012 3:36:31 PM] james: outside of the game
[14/01/2012 3:36:35 PM] james: that he misrepresented?
[14/01/2012 3:36:42 PM] james: theres no way in hell
[14/01/2012 3:36:45 PM] james: thats a town incog
[14/01/2012 3:36:47 PM] james: he knows better
[14/01/2012 3:36:57 PM] Sandro Maculan: he's pretty good mafia then
[14/01/2012 3:37:05 PM] Sandro Maculan: cuz i got a strong town lean on him
[14/01/2012 3:37:10 PM] james: he has 3 posts
[14/01/2012 3:37:14 PM] Sandro Maculan: based on the way he posts his shit
[14/01/2012 3:37:14 PM] james: and has support
[14/01/2012 3:37:16 PM] james: on a stance of
[14/01/2012 3:37:24 PM] james: "ill lynch ciryandor" into "ill lynch bc"
[14/01/2012 3:37:31 PM] james: he posts
[14/01/2012 3:37:34 PM] james: analysis posts
[14/01/2012 3:37:42 PM] james: mafia thats easy to do
[14/01/2012 3:37:47 PM] james: he fucks up day 1
[14/01/2012 3:37:52 PM] james: whoops day 1 analysis dudes
[14/01/2012 3:37:54 PM] james: my bad
[14/01/2012 3:38:31 PM] Sandro Maculan: k if you really have a good case on him being scum and get elected you can push it day2 since you will be alive
[14/01/2012 3:38:56 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'll vote for you if you don't lynch into vets day1
[14/01/2012 3:39:48 PM] james: and who would you recommend?
[14/01/2012 3:39:53 PM] james: a random non talker?
[14/01/2012 3:39:57 PM] james: which we have a million of
[14/01/2012 3:40:11 PM] Sandro Maculan: i'd recomend a flip between one of your bgs
[14/01/2012 3:40:15 PM] Sandro Maculan: and ciryandor
[14/01/2012 3:40:30 PM] Sandro Maculan: maybe you can even say in thread
[14/01/2012 3:40:50 PM] Sandro Maculan: that you will lynch one of the bgs 50% of the time
[14/01/2012 3:40:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: and don't even roll
[14/01/2012 3:41:21 PM] Sandro Maculan: that's because mafia can sub bgs in and kill both elected roles without outing anyone
[14/01/2012 3:41:23 PM] james: ....................
[14/01/2012 3:41:25 PM] james: i can't
[14/01/2012 3:41:26 PM] james: lynch
[14/01/2012 3:41:27 PM] james: a bg
[14/01/2012 3:41:35 PM] james: the mayor lynch choice
[14/01/2012 3:41:37 PM] james: has to be in
[14/01/2012 3:41:37 PM] Sandro Maculan: you can threaten
[14/01/2012 3:41:38 PM] james: when you get
[14/01/2012 3:41:40 PM] james: elected
[14/01/2012 3:41:40 PM] Sandro Maculan: treathen
[14/01/2012 3:41:45 PM] james: ITS FULL OF SHIT
[14/01/2012 3:41:49 PM] james: bgs are chosen after lynch
[14/01/2012 3:41:56 PM] james: its a god damn lie
[14/01/2012 3:41:57 PM] Sandro Maculan: oh
[14/01/2012 3:42:06 PM] Sandro Maculan: i didn't know that
[14/01/2012 3:42:11 PM] james: fw always makes the mayor candidates
[14/01/2012 3:42:14 PM] james: send in the lynch choice
[14/01/2012 3:42:16 PM] james: like
[14/01/2012 3:42:19 PM] james: 1 hour ahead
[14/01/2012 3:42:20 PM] james: of the post
[14/01/2012 3:42:30 PM] james: so that someone dies within 5 minutes of deadline
[14/01/2012 3:42:36 PM] james: mafia then decides to sub in or not
[14/01/2012 3:42:37 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol then you need to out one of your bgs to me
[14/01/2012 3:42:38 PM] james: based on election results
[14/01/2012 3:42:45 PM] james: was pretty sure
[14/01/2012 3:42:50 PM] james: that I was going to do a cipher
[14/01/2012 3:42:57 PM] james: and hand 1 half to you, and the other half elsewhere
[14/01/2012 3:43:16 PM] james: in the event I die
[14/01/2012 3:43:21 PM] Sandro Maculan: yeah seems like a plan
[14/01/2012 3:43:27 PM] Sandro Maculan: and tell the thread that i know
[14/01/2012 3:43:36 PM] Sandro Maculan: and whoever is the other person that know
[14/01/2012 3:43:37 PM] Sandro Maculan: s
[14/01/2012 3:43:50 PM] james: openly telling thread who the people are
[14/01/2012 3:43:53 PM] james: just means they die as well
[14/01/2012 3:43:53 PM] james: kik
[14/01/2012 3:43:55 PM] james: lol*
[14/01/2012 3:43:58 PM] Sandro Maculan: no man
[14/01/2012 3:44:11 PM] Sandro Maculan: unless you trust me and this other dude 100%
[14/01/2012 3:44:24 PM] Sandro Maculan: you have to tell the thread who has the info
[14/01/2012 3:44:41 PM] Sandro Maculan: not who are the bgs
[14/01/2012 3:44:45 PM] Sandro Maculan: that would be dumb
[14/01/2012 3:44:55 PM] james: its pretty obvious
[14/01/2012 3:45:01 PM] james: who id be handing it out to
[14/01/2012 3:45:19 PM] Sandro Maculan: yeah the other dude that mason you
[14/01/2012 3:45:25 PM] Sandro Maculan: do you trust him?
[14/01/2012 3:45:46 PM] james: eh? enough with half a cipher
[14/01/2012 3:46:10 PM] james: say im elected and im town + sheriff is town
[14/01/2012 3:46:12 PM] james: i hand you + opz
[14/01/2012 3:46:15 PM] james: the info
[14/01/2012 3:46:19 PM] james: if both bgs die night 1
[14/01/2012 3:46:23 PM] james: you are both obviously red
[14/01/2012 3:46:35 PM] james: if myself + sheriff die night 1
[14/01/2012 3:46:37 PM] james: both bgs are red
[14/01/2012 3:46:47 PM] james: if you or opz dont come forward with the info
[14/01/2012 3:46:50 PM] james: we snagged another red
[14/01/2012 3:47:07 PM] james: if both bgs die while myself + sheriff are still alive
[14/01/2012 3:47:12 PM] james: likely 1 of is red
[14/01/2012 3:47:26 PM] james: or you and opz are
[14/01/2012 3:47:27 PM] james: regardless
[14/01/2012 3:47:34 PM] james: its either 1 or 2 reds
[14/01/2012 3:47:41 PM] james: in the case
[14/01/2012 3:47:42 PM] Sandro Maculan: man
[14/01/2012 3:47:46 PM] james: and having the names out
[14/01/2012 3:47:47 PM] Sandro Maculan: I can't be elected
[14/01/2012 3:47:49 PM] james: works as a deterent
[14/01/2012 3:47:54 PM] james: to shooting / subbing them
[14/01/2012 3:47:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: I won't be here for the lynch
[14/01/2012 3:48:34 PM] Sandro Maculan: yeah seems good enough
[14/01/2012 3:49:22 PM] Sandro Maculan: day ends today right?
[14/01/2012 3:50:29 PM] james: uh let me check
[14/01/2012 3:51:02 PM] james: yea
[14/01/2012 3:51:20 PM] james: aksi
[14/01/2012 3:51:23 PM] james: also
[14/01/2012 3:51:27 PM] james: interesting move foolishness
[14/01/2012 3:51:40 PM] james: he voted me
[14/01/2012 3:51:41 PM] james: not bm
[14/01/2012 3:51:45 PM] Sandro Maculan: you are lynching protact 100%?
[14/01/2012 3:52:13 PM] james: not 100% no
[14/01/2012 3:53:12 PM] james: i have foolishness, palmar, protact, brownbear and wiggles
[14/01/2012 3:53:16 PM] james: on a list of possible red vets
[14/01/2012 3:53:21 PM] Sandro Maculan: lol
[14/01/2012 3:53:28 PM] Sandro Maculan: i want to lynch none of those
[14/01/2012 3:53:35 PM] james: most wont
[14/01/2012 3:53:41 PM] james: brownbear hasn't posted that I remember
[14/01/2012 3:53:47 PM] james: if i had to choose former mayor candidates
[14/01/2012 3:53:50 PM] james: is shoot slardar
[14/01/2012 3:53:51 PM] Sandro Maculan: bb might even get mkéd
[14/01/2012 3:53:53 PM] james: but hes so obviously not red
[14/01/2012 3:54:12 PM] james: so many vets have done
[14/01/2012 3:54:13 PM] Sandro Maculan: tbh i don't even remember reading his posts
[14/01/2012 3:54:15 PM] james: dick fuck all
[14/01/2012 4:01:44 PM] Sandro Maculan: man I'll compromise don't lynch fool or incog then you get my vote
[14/01/2012 4:04:25 PM] james: fine, ill agree to that
[14/01/2012 4:05:49 PM] Sandro Maculan: k gotta roll
[14/01/2012 4:05:54 PM] Sandro Maculan: I'd totally support palmar
[14/01/2012 4:06:00 PM] Sandro Maculan: fuck him he is scum
[14/01/2012 4:07:01 PM] james: lol
[14/01/2012 4:17:56 PM] james: off to work be back later
[12:05:56 AM] Sandro Maculan: i'm back
[12:06:01 AM] Sandro Maculan: who got lynched
[12:11:43 AM] james: palmar flipped miller
[12:11:47 AM] james: and you almsot got modkilled i think
[12:11:55 AM] Sandro Maculan: yeah
[12:12:00 AM] Sandro Maculan: just checked that
[12:12:03 AM] Sandro Maculan: =/
[12:12:16 AM] Sandro Maculan: i didn't even realize there was a voting thread
[12:12:23 AM] james: lol
[12:12:36 AM] Sandro Maculan: i saw plenty of people voting in thread
[12:12:39 AM] Sandro Maculan: and never checked
[12:12:54 AM] Sandro Maculan: fucking palmar man
[12:12:59 AM] james: least he was miller
[12:13:07 AM] Sandro Maculan: yeah
[12:13:11 AM] Sandro Maculan: not as bad
[12:13:12 AM] Sandro Maculan: but sitll
[12:13:20 AM] Sandro Maculan: i was pretty sure he was mafia
[12:14:12 AM] james: im more comfortable with my read still
[12:14:14 AM] james: on incog
[12:14:50 AM] Sandro Maculan: incog is my second strongest read this game
[12:14:52 AM] Sandro Maculan: as town
[12:14:59 AM] james: why his flop
[12:15:02 AM] james: with no real reason
[12:15:08 AM] Sandro Maculan: man
[12:15:09 AM] james: from me
[12:15:11 AM] james: to someone else?
[12:15:13 AM] Sandro Maculan: i did read that
[12:15:19 AM] Sandro Maculan: that's pretty normal as town
[12:15:23 AM] james: nah
[12:15:28 AM] james: his campaign run
[12:15:30 AM] Sandro Maculan: and pretty danm wierd if e is mafia
[12:15:30 AM] james: that picked up steam
[12:15:32 AM] james: was offing me
[12:15:41 AM] Sandro Maculan: mafia wants to keep their story straigh
[12:15:50 AM] Sandro Maculan: and draw the least amount of suspicion
[12:15:55 AM] james: eh? depends on the player
[12:15:58 AM] Sandro Maculan: nothing about his play screams mafia
[12:15:59 AM] james: doing things that are
[12:16:06 AM] james: "non standard cause they are bad"
[12:16:12 AM] Sandro Maculan: i read that game curu played in
[12:16:13 AM] james: is a valid strat
[12:16:14 AM] james: lol
[12:16:21 AM] Sandro Maculan: sure
[12:16:33 AM] james: vets routinely do things that are "wtfish" because they can get away with it when no one else can
[12:16:34 AM] Sandro Maculan: but they neve pull it off
[12:16:42 AM] Sandro Maculan: they always keep somewhat neutral
[12:17:05 AM] Sandro Maculan: dunno i used to thin k that way
[12:17:20 AM] Sandro Maculan: and thought you were mafia 2 games in which you were not
[12:17:26 AM] james: to be fair
[12:17:32 AM] james: regardless of my alignment
[12:17:37 AM] Sandro Maculan: mafia behaves similarly no matter how good they are supposed to be
[12:17:37 AM] james: people typically view my play
[12:17:38 AM] james: as red
[12:18:01 AM] Sandro Maculan: all my conspiracy theories
[12:18:16 AM] Sandro Maculan: like these guy is incredible mafia and must be doing yx
[12:18:22 AM] james: lol
[12:18:25 AM] Sandro Maculan: always prove to be wrong
[12:18:42 AM] Sandro Maculan: the simplest thing is most likely truth
[12:18:52 AM] james: usually
[12:18:59 AM] james: the exception is vet players
[12:19:10 AM] Sandro Maculan: nah
[12:19:11 AM] james: most vets dont play
[12:19:13 AM] james: fucked up
[12:19:14 AM] Sandro Maculan: they aren't
[12:19:15 AM] james: ace does
[12:19:23 AM] Sandro Maculan: that's hat i'm saying
[12:19:30 AM] Sandro Maculan: even ace
[12:19:31 AM] james: lol
[12:19:35 AM] james: ace does ballsy shit
[12:19:36 AM] james: in the open
[12:19:40 AM] Sandro Maculan: acts way more calmly when mafia
[12:19:47 AM] james: until you provke him
[12:19:48 AM] Sandro Maculan: when town he is way more out there
[12:19:54 AM] Sandro Maculan: nah man
[12:20:07 AM] james: im saying from experience
[12:20:13 AM] james: you can pressure him
[12:20:13 AM] james: hard
[12:20:18 AM] james: and by pressure i mean
[12:20:18 AM] Sandro Maculan: yeah maybe you are right
[12:20:20 AM] james: argue like a champ
[12:20:26 AM] Sandro Maculan: i'm saying form experience too
[12:20:27 AM] james: till he gets super pissed
[12:20:28 AM] james: lol
[12:20:30 AM] james: it takes alot
[12:20:32 AM] james: and I mean alot
[12:22:13 AM] Sandro Maculan: man i need to sleep
[12:22:16 AM] james: haha
[12:22:17 AM] james: then crash
[12:22:37 AM] Sandro Maculan: i got woken up 4 hours after i hit the sac today
[12:22:57 AM] Sandro Maculan: i got home early toay cuz i was like a fucking zombie
[12:23:13 AM] Sandro Maculan: gnight man
[11:27:44 AM] Sandro Maculan: yo
[11:27:49 AM] Sandro Maculan: can we still talk?
[11:27:59 AM] Sandro Maculan: or it's only for the day?
[11:29:08 AM] Sandro Maculan: fucking. hung over.
[11:29:26 AM] Sandro Maculan: need. more. drinks.
[5:16:33 PM] james: we can yes

Nice try, but no. Look at the timing of these posts. You claim that sandroba made BC lynch Palmar 5 hours before before BC posted his chat logs. I don't believe that you are clairvoyant. The only information that you should have had access to was the post you quoted from the thread.

Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 06:05 sandroba wrote:
Palmar you need to try harder, you are too easy to spot as scum nowadays. I'd rather not lynch any vets day1 but you make it so hard not to lynch you. Please go die in a corner.
I'll vote BC since we came to a compromise in pms. Gotta roll.
##Vote: BloodyC0bbler


But I seriously doubt that as a townie you would be bold enough to claim that Sandroba forced BC to lynch Palmar, when his in thread post is quite ambiguous. ESPECIALLY when wherebugsgo was THE #1 vocal proponent of lynching Palmar. If you were a townie, I highly doubt that you would ignore wherebugsgo's BLATANT support for the Palmar lynch and instead attempt to pin it on sandroba.

Your story does not match up. You posess information that you should not have had at the time and are trying to hide it.


Toad can you explain how you came to the conclusion that sandro influenced BC?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 00:44 GMT
#1927
On January 17 2012 09:41 p4NDemik wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 08:33 wherebugsgo wrote:
##vote Protactinium

On my phone; in short, massive slip. When the "day 1 summary" was posted by Protactinium, it suggested that there was pre-knowledge that the chaos was town-induced.
Note how Protactinium never questions that the people who pushed Palmar for lynch (WBG and other hardliners) were anything but town. It's not possible to make absolute generalizations like Protactinium is doing unless there's knowledge that those generalizations are true. That knowledge is only available to scum.

I'll post more about this shortly when I get comp access.

As opposed to: "Note how Protactinium never questions that I or the other people who pushed Palmar for lynch were anything but town"

This is the line that I'm wondering about. I don't know why you are claiming it doesn't exist or why you are so indignant. It just read incredibly fishy. I've never referred to myself like this online and I've never seen anyone else do it. You aren't omitting anything you substituted in an acronym for your nickname that I have never seen you use and everyone else commonly uses.

Add Kenpachi coming out of no where to make me feel like a dipshit with no reasoning and I'm just more suspicious.


ah, that line was just a direct quote of what Protac said. That's why I put it in parentheses.

I didn't even remember that line. You should have pointed it out earlier so there was less confusion and waste of time.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:27 GMT
#1958
On January 17 2012 10:10 Bill Murray wrote:
WBG I am trying to jail to lower their KP
Say L was roleblocked and Lanaia was jailed
WHAT IF BOTH ARE MAFIA?
That would explain why we had 3 mafia KP last night, and not 4
i am CERTAIN 1 of OpZ or BC are mafia, now, and who else to elect mayor if not the mafia jack?


LOL

You're jailing them to lower their KP? Is that even how the KP functions in this game?

You should be jailing to protect. Also, you're pretty much wrong about mafia KP being 3 yesterday. If you truly believe mafia KP was 3 why aren't you calling kita scum for his hit claim?


On January 17 2012 09:53 p4NDemik wrote:
wherebugsgo if you could so kindly link to the post that Protact used that phrase then I might think about removing my vote for you to be lynched. Because right now I can't find that in Protactinium's or Incognito's posting history and now I'm pretty sure you're just straight up lying to me.

Maybe you're paraphrasing and I've caught you on absolutely nothing but for now I'm putting in my vote to ##vote wherebugsgo


http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&currentpage=93#1860

On January 17 2012 07:42 Protactinium wrote:
You have some hardline players like WBG and company who want to throw Palmar off a cliff, and a bunch of useless mason discussion.


it wasn't a direct quote since I was on my phone, I just paraphrased it.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:28 GMT
#1962
oh also even if KP functioned that way, it wouldn't have worked, because 3 scum would have needed to be roleblocked for it to work.

So I think BM is full of shit and needs to die now.

##unvote Scamp

##vote Bill Murray
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:31 GMT
#1964
supersoft:

Is Toad scum?

I have an answer already, I want you to help. You being German and all.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:37 GMT
#1968
On January 17 2012 10:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 10:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
oh also even if KP functioned that way, it wouldn't have worked, because 3 scum would have needed to be roleblocked for it to work.

So I think BM is full of shit and needs to die now.

##unvote Scamp

##vote Bill Murray


What do you think about Bill's claim of being masoned by 2 people who aren't BC and Opz, and subsequent insistence that BC is mafia?



What is there to think?

Nothing Bill Murray has done has made sense. It's just brainless flailing around. In what universe does the sheriff jail someone to lower mafia KP? Particularly, in the universe we live in, it takes 3 dead scum for mafia KP to drop, which makes his claim of "I jailed Lanaia so mafia KP would drop" even more frightening.


wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:41 GMT
#1971
On January 17 2012 10:39 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 10:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
supersoft:

Is Toad scum?

I have an answer already, I want you to help. You being German and all.


I guess you think I am mafia because I told you palmar is town and I am telling you sandroba is mafia?

Don't like it? Why?


y u so scared bro?

As I asked earlier, which post by sandro gave you the impression that he convinced BC to lynch Palmar?

BC, what do you think of this Protac/Toad situation?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:43 GMT
#1973
On January 17 2012 10:42 L wrote:
2 of 2
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 10:28 Kenpachi wrote:
On January 17 2012 10:26 Toadesstern wrote:
On January 17 2012 10:23 BrownBear wrote:
Not to mention Kenpachi immediately switches his vote to Sandroba right after Toadesstern posts a huge rant about why Sandroba must die (page 97). I feel like he's avoiding attention for some reason, and I want to know why.


I think that's coincidence. I doubt he's able to read my post within 60 secs :p
Kepnachi is know to be a troll who is not contributing and will definitly hang the moment we run out of reasonable lynch-targets.

nono i read your shit. it was good

This was well timed.

Kenpachi should be dead according to Kurumis crumb. No ones come out in the past day to explain anything. Kurumis crumb was super overt, which indicates that he was comfortable dying during the night.

This particular post, however, is both a way of distancing Toad from Kenpachi (he is a troll, he will hang), while simultaneously defending him (He wont hang till everyone else of worthy suspicion dies). Even if Kenpachi is shot and flips red, Toad can push his connection with the hang comment. If he dies and flips down, Toad can claim he was the lowest priority.

This is possibly the safest disengagement post possible.

Given the fact that last night indicates that Kenpachi is mafia, his sheeping on Toad combined with Toads response indicats that theyre not just buddies, but scumbuddies.

If you arent swayed, check out Kenpachis filter:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&user=51151
Toads filter is much more interesting read:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&user=40853


I love you.

L what are your thoughts on Protac?

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 01:49 GMT
#1976
On January 17 2012 10:46 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 10:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 17 2012 10:39 Toadesstern wrote:
On January 17 2012 10:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
supersoft:

Is Toad scum?

I have an answer already, I want you to help. You being German and all.


I guess you think I am mafia because I told you palmar is town and I am telling you sandroba is mafia?

Don't like it? Why?


y u so scared bro?

As I asked earlier, which post by sandro gave you the impression that he convinced BC to lynch Palmar?

BC, what do you think of this Protac/Toad situation?


because I don't want to lose again as a townie
100% win-rate as mafia
0% win rate as townie.
Yeah I'm totally scared because I'm mafia :p

But enough of this trolling. Are you even reading what I posted? I explained that the post I quoted from sandroba made me think e made BC lynch palmar. I was right, it is reasonable and you ignore it.

You lynched palmar (a townie). You are trying to safe sandroba with everything you got and still I think you're a townie from what you posted d1. But you're a little to often wrong for me right now


I don't give a shit about sandroba, actually. I want him to die as much as the next guy, but I am more concerned with other people atm, because they are not receiving any attention. And, as we all know, mafia love attention.

You like the attention, don't you? As I say again, where did sandro say he convinced BC to lynch Palmar? You can point to that "compromise" post all you want, but it says nothing. Protac is right that you are stretching the hell out of that one post to try and make yourself look correct.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 07:16 GMT
#2125
I agree with L that lynching Protactinium + BM would be good, but what people keep saying about L playing like he played Responsibility is true.

I'm a little unsure of everything right now, so I'm going to sleep on it and come back tomorrow.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 07:26 GMT
#2127
On January 17 2012 13:28 Foolishness wrote:
Opz is someone who I believe Sheth was the first to cast doubt on, and I must say Sheth is definitely onto something. I know of the past Opz as a town player who is aggressive, not afraid to call people out on their bullshit. That's something we aren't seeing much of this game. He's posted a few of his own thoughts, but there is a clear lack of effort. Bored townie who is facepalming at having to read 100 pages? Possibly. Mafia hiding in the shadows? Fits better.


dunno who was first and I honestly don't care, but I find opz to be rather scummy as well.

Do you think he's worth a lynch today, or should we lynch someone like BM instead?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:24 GMT
#2214
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:25 GMT
#2216
Oh kill that Adam guy too, he's been saying weird shit for days.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:35 GMT
#2223
On January 18 2012 05:31 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray - probably, since he's in an office I'd say he's "should probably kill" instead
Lanaia - that's bullshit imo
Toadesstern that IS bullshit
Meapak agree
Scamp same as GGQ and Macpo imo
Bumatlarge agree

Should probably kill:

Jackal disagree
Sandro this guy needs to be in must kill
L same as sandro
Protactinium same as sandro

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



Judging on how much we think differently I'd say you're a probably kill as well. You're just wrong way too often


The fact that you can confidently say I'm wrong too often when I've only been provably wrong once means you need to die today.

At most, you'd know that I've been wrong twice, (if you are town) which isn't
"too often" unless your standards for finding scum are unreasonably high, which I don't find likely, seeing as I don't believe you've ever even found scum as town before.

##unvote Protactinium
##vote Toadesstern
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:37 GMT
#2228
On January 18 2012 05:30 Cwave wrote:
BC back to share who he mason'd with yet? Or gonna try and avoid that request?
If Mapco is getting modkilled i will ##vote: Chaosquo


what the fuck is this?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:44 GMT
#2233
On January 18 2012 05:40 Cwave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...


Don't join then? :O

Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You just listed 10 people without ANY case in the post and we allready flipped one scummy bastard. So after these 11, you would continue lynching random lurkers?



If any of those players flip town, I'd be willing to lynch you, for one. Also, I don't need to provide an explanation for any of these unless I need to. I'm operating on a need to know basis right now. You can be assured that I have good reasons for suspecting these players. However, I'm not about to bomb the thread with a massive post that no one's going to read. If you actually care and have a difference in opinion, go ahead and ask specific questions.

Also Toad that's cute but it doesn't make you any less scummy. Care to explain why you think my scumread of lanaia is bullshit?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:51 GMT
#2237
On January 18 2012 05:47 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 05:44 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:40 Cwave wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...


Don't join then? :O

On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You just listed 10 people without ANY case in the post and we allready flipped one scummy bastard. So after these 11, you would continue lynching random lurkers?


[...]

Also Toad that's cute but it doesn't make you any less scummy. Care to explain why you think my scumread of lanaia is bullshit?

she's a null, maybe a slight town read for me. Looks to me like her "sry guys, I'm really not sure"-wishy-washy-town-meta.


Which is almost precisely the same as her scum meta.

Yeah, that totally gets us somewhere.

When she's scum she refuses to talk about specific scum reads and lynches.
This happened in XLVII and this game too. In Steamship she had some semblance of reads and wanted to kill people a couple of times, from what I remember. I'll look at the two games and see if I can confirm similarities.

At any rate, since your defense is so atrocious I still have no problem killing you.

Anyone have a town read on Toad? Speak soon!
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 20:58 GMT
#2240
I was gonna point out the GGQ ninja, but got beaten to it by scum:

On January 18 2012 05:55 Scamp wrote:
GGQ just voted without posting.

Interesting.


Have you even voted?

Do you even have a scumread?

Your filter is still full of the stuff I put in the toilet every morning at 8.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 21:09 GMT
#2246
On January 18 2012 06:01 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Foolishness, Protact/Incog, or BC. Get in this thread and start pushing your chosen candidate or I'm going to go back and vote GGQ. I expected you guys to try and lead this thread, however if you're unwilling or unable then the thread will derp (as it is now). At least when I'm pushing someone the thread has direction, right now everyone and their grandma is screaming scum at someone else.

So get in here and start pushing macpo. You three apparently thought he was the best choice for today. I agree he's scummy but GGQ was better... so in interest of streamlining discussion I went with you guys. However none of you have shown any interest in keeping people on track so if none of you have gotten it together in two hours I'm going back and lynching GGQ.


Meapak, if you knew that someone was going to kill you in the next five minutes what would you do?

Why do you insist these players push macpo instead of coming up with your own solid opinion about him?

What are your thoughts on Bill Murray?

Also, I forgot to include a tiny disclaimer to all townies:

As of right now, the "kill reads" I publish may or may not actually be current kill reads. Just FYI. However, I still want opinions from everyone about killing the people I've mentioned.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 21:15 GMT
#2247
On January 18 2012 06:07 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 05:58 wherebugsgo wrote:
I was gonna point out the GGQ ninja, but got beaten to it by scum:

On January 18 2012 05:55 Scamp wrote:
GGQ just voted without posting.

Interesting.


Have you even voted?

Do you even have a scumread?

Your filter is still full of the stuff I put in the toilet every morning at 8.


Come on dude - when was the last time you got up before 1pm?

What is your read on the following vets:
BM
Meapak
Foolishness
Sandroba

Of all of them, I have the strongest town-read on Meapak, but Foolishness is a close second. I'm on the fence about Sandroba and I think BM is probably scum at this point. What about you?


Today, since I started school again lol.

Scum
Scumish
Townish
Meh

In that order.

BM is either scum or clinically insane, neither of which is surprising and both of which warrant death by lynch.

Meapak is acting super funny-like and has just said some weird things overall. He seems to lack confidence and originality in his opinions, which is something strange to see in a vet player.
Note my response to his last post.

Foolishness has ramped up his activity today. There isn't any real good reason for me to believe he is town other than I agree with some of his reads and there exist far better targets. So for now, since I find more than 10 other people scummy, by process of elimination I have him as townish.

Sandro is meh cause his comments on masons made no sense and he has still not done much, but so far I haven't found a proper reason to call him scum. I need to read his posts again.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 21:18 GMT
#2250
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 21:25 GMT
#2257
On January 18 2012 06:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 06:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?


I voted who I wanted to lynch. I've posted my reasons. Read my posts instead of blindly calling me scum. It makes you look scummy. Scum.


I have read your posts. You had a scum read on Lanaia and on BM as well. You reprimanded foolishness for suspecting you. However, I don't recall you putting your vote in this thread.

I'm on my phone right now, so I'm too lazy to change threads and try to hunt through pages to find your vote. I also donMt particularly care, for reasons that should slowly become apparent to people who are reading this right now.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 22:00 GMT
#2271
On January 18 2012 06:45 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 06:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?


I voted who I wanted to lynch. I've posted my reasons. Read my posts instead of blindly calling me scum. It makes you look scummy. Scum.


I have read your posts. You had a scum read on Lanaia and on BM as well. You reprimanded foolishness for suspecting you. However, I don't recall you putting your vote in this thread.

I'm on my phone right now, so I'm too lazy to change threads and try to hunt through pages to find your vote. I also donMt particularly care, for reasons that should slowly become apparent to people who are reading this right now.


You ignored my issues with protactinum. Which I'm starting to get fed up with tbh.

Again. I'm going to say it. He claimed to have provided the thread with direction with only having four posts, two of which were EXTREMELY unsubstantial, changed his lynch target (if elected) from someone now confirmed as mafia, to BC, who I view with my strongest town read. Not to mention all the random early votes he received with absolutely no reasoning. But hey, who cares what I say.


Nah, just forgot. You like jumping to conclusions, don't you?

Now I think here's where I jump to the conclusion that you ignored how I hated on Protac too. Oh but wait, that's your job, not mine. Sorry, I'm bad at this roleplaying shit.



wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 22:27 GMT
#2277
On January 18 2012 07:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
Macpo
I went back over dude's posts. There aren't many, it wasn't hard. The lack of posts doesn't bother me, as he's new and games this size are pretty intimidating. However, there's something that I don't think was covered (forgive me if I'm wrong) that I found worth noting.

In one of his only scumhunting posts, he lists off like 6 lurkers, calling out several of them for "empty posts". This bothers me for a couple of reasons. First of all, up to this point his post history is equally scummy by his standards. Secondly, it has a surprising lack of Ciryador - who has all of FIVE posts up to this point and all of them are pretty "empty" by his standards. I found it surprising because several people had called out Ciry at this point, so why would he neglect to check him out? Was it that he found his posts to be satisfactorily contributory? Or something more sinister?

Ultimately, I'm comfortable with where my vote is at. The only thing that gives me pause is the fact that several people have been calling for a vote-switch based on the fact that he's "going to get modkilled", but he shows up. That seems like a golden opportunity for scum to get a mass vote-switch going, and I feel like if he's on any kind of competent scum team, they'd have told him to stay absent from the thread until much later...but that doesn't rule out the possibility of him checking in and posting before checking with his team. Again...I'm pretty comfortable with where my vote is at.


If macpo is scum I bet a bunch of those guys are too.

I would not be surprised at all to see that BB is scum, hiro is scum, Munk-E is scum, etc.

Problem is right now that the lurkers are as likely to flip scum as they are to flip toucan.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 22:28 GMT
#2278
On January 18 2012 07:26 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:45 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?


I voted who I wanted to lynch. I've posted my reasons. Read my posts instead of blindly calling me scum. It makes you look scummy. Scum.


I have read your posts. You had a scum read on Lanaia and on BM as well. You reprimanded foolishness for suspecting you. However, I don't recall you putting your vote in this thread.

I'm on my phone right now, so I'm too lazy to change threads and try to hunt through pages to find your vote. I also donMt particularly care, for reasons that should slowly become apparent to people who are reading this right now.


You ignored my issues with protactinum. Which I'm starting to get fed up with tbh.

Again. I'm going to say it. He claimed to have provided the thread with direction with only having four posts, two of which were EXTREMELY unsubstantial, changed his lynch target (if elected) from someone now confirmed as mafia, to BC, who I view with my strongest town read. Not to mention all the random early votes he received with absolutely no reasoning. But hey, who cares what I say.


Nah, just forgot. You like jumping to conclusions, don't you?

Now I think here's where I jump to the conclusion that you ignored how I hated on Protac too. Oh but wait, that's your job, not mine. Sorry, I'm bad at this roleplaying shit.




Yet my vote rests on protact and yours doesn't. I'm supporting my case with what action the only action I can.


It was on Protact. I'd rather vote someone who actually has a chance of being lynched today. So far there is no indication that a Protactinium lynch will succeed.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 17 2012 22:34 GMT
#2282
what does everyone think of hiro?

I'm rather curious.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 18 2012 01:42 GMT
#2309
On January 18 2012 07:29 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:26 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:45 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?


I voted who I wanted to lynch. I've posted my reasons. Read my posts instead of blindly calling me scum. It makes you look scummy. Scum.


I have read your posts. You had a scum read on Lanaia and on BM as well. You reprimanded foolishness for suspecting you. However, I don't recall you putting your vote in this thread.

I'm on my phone right now, so I'm too lazy to change threads and try to hunt through pages to find your vote. I also donMt particularly care, for reasons that should slowly become apparent to people who are reading this right now.


You ignored my issues with protactinum. Which I'm starting to get fed up with tbh.

Again. I'm going to say it. He claimed to have provided the thread with direction with only having four posts, two of which were EXTREMELY unsubstantial, changed his lynch target (if elected) from someone now confirmed as mafia, to BC, who I view with my strongest town read. Not to mention all the random early votes he received with absolutely no reasoning. But hey, who cares what I say.


Nah, just forgot. You like jumping to conclusions, don't you?

Now I think here's where I jump to the conclusion that you ignored how I hated on Protac too. Oh but wait, that's your job, not mine. Sorry, I'm bad at this roleplaying shit.




Yet my vote rests on protact and yours doesn't. I'm supporting my case with what action the only action I can.


It was on Protact. I'd rather vote someone who actually has a chance of being lynched today. So far there is no indication that a Protactinium lynch will succeed.


And this passive attitude is what sheep are made of.


cause I'm totally sheeping people, right?

Wtf kind of drugs are you on? I want some.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 18 2012 01:43 GMT
#2311
Sheth makes a very good point that I almost forgot to mention earlier (I was going to ask him this)

OpZ, since you think BM is such an easy read, can you tell us what his alignment is?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 18 2012 02:22 GMT
#2332
So, opz, if BM is obviously scum why the hell is your vote on Protact instead?

Incog is generally much harder to read, no?

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 18 2012 03:13 GMT
#2344
I wanna kill BM still.

And Toad.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 18 2012 11:08 GMT
#2366
LOL lynch BM for saying mafia know who the town are throug deductive reasoning. They know who the town are based on the fact that they know they aren't town.

What he just said is among the stupidest things I've ever seen someone say in a game of mafia. BM, if this is your piss poor attempt at a contribution that makes you look town, I am amused. Unfortunately, since vigis cannot target you, we must expend a lynch instead.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 01:12 GMT
#2469
On January 19 2012 09:33 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 09:30 VisceraEyes wrote:
Toad, I'm trying to wrap my brain around what you mean - are you saying C_C was chainsaw defending and is therefor scum? Or are you agreeing with him that people who are attacking you for attacking Sandro are scum? What are you implying here? Passive sentences are a breeding-ground of confusion...

nothing really. I thought it's funny because you could interpret it that way that CC himself is scum which obviously is bullshit because that would mean mentioning chainsaw-defence itself is scummy. It was just something I saw and thought it's funny
I'm not saying CC is scum nor wbg. I think wbg is an overconfident townie atm. Could change if he really wants to get my lynched.


yeah, I want you lynched.

I also want BM lynched. So, first thing tomorrow = you and BM get my vote.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 01:37 GMT
#2477
On January 19 2012 10:20 hiro protagonist wrote:
Regardless of this town should/should not direct medics blahblahblah, Im gonna be supper pissed if one of Protac or foolishness dies with less than 3 bullets in there body tonight. I mean, I wish I was a medic, because It would not take longer than a flip of a coin to decide who I was protecting tonight.

Also, does anyone remember my case on Sandroba? Here Ill spoiler it for your convenience:
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 17 2012 07:21 hiro protagonist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2012 17:11 sandroba wrote:
Hi everybody, I'll be running for mayor and I need your support. The whole basis of my campaign is being town and pretty decent at figuring out scum. Myself holding day1 lynch and 3 votes everyday is a pretty good deal on average I'd say so. Also it's ridiculously easy to figure out my alignment not only because I suck as scum, but also because I hate it and usually can't keep up with the thread after a few days. So yeah, you don't have to worry about that because I'm thankfully town this game. Another benefit to electing me is that I usually get shot pretty early on (normally day2 the latest), and I can tell you that keeping me alive will improve town's chances by a lot. Let me say that there is no fucking reason to not elect a trustworthy established sumhunter in favor of electing a new player whose millage may vary. The main goal of the mayor role is to get someone who can reliably get scum lynched and be a threat to mafia. Putting in a random dude has no benefit to town and can even be detrimental if the dude has his head stuck up his ass.
So town gather up and give me your support, because mafia isn't going to let me get this position easily. It makes them feel unsafe and fearful. They are right. I'm coming for them.


This post stuck out at me. The bolded part is what really stands out in this post. Its true. In the games I have played with sand as scum (PTP:I) after day 2, he just gave up for the most part. however, that he says that his scum play is bad is not the case at all. I think sandroba is one of the best day 1 scum players here. He will often go out of his way to do things that scum would never do on day 1, making pining him down as scum later in the game as hard to do. He makes a strong day 1 showing his game plan so he can ride on it for a few cycles as he gets more lazy, to use his own words. So what happened In PYP:I day 1?

*He devises a plan for how town should pick there roles, argues against people trying to put up other plans, and re-works the plan with the obviously townie and eventually Mayor Radfield. This plan adopted for the most part by a lot of townies results in a very strong set of roles for town.

*He get very active in PM land with a group of players that come to control the rest of the game. later on, WBG starts to really tunnel sandroba for being scum, but he can not convenience anyone else that sand is scum a la "look how pro town he is", this despite the fact that for the whole game he did NO SCUM HUNTING. he lives till the end of the game despite mostly giving up after day 2 because of his infiltration of the town circle and there read on him as town.

So far We have many Day 1 similarity's:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 04:26 sandroba wrote:
Okay let me address somethings I liked in this thread:

1) Proactinum post is the best one so far. Fuck yes I like it. Cyriandor is my top candidate for lynch if I get elected.

2) Jackal's idea is very good. If I'm elected I'll lynch 1 or 0 bg.

3) I'm seriously considering supporting a mason mass claim day1. Mafia will have to claim it early if they ever want to use it and it gives us good basis for discussion. These big games fall rapidly out of control if we don't keep focus and this will give us something to go by.


Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 05:34 sandroba wrote:
Alright peeps here are the advantages of mass claim masons:

1) It forces mafia to come under a lot of scrutiny if they want to use the mason power. The plan is to watch these people closely and get a lot of the info out in the open, instead of allowing masons to operate in the shadows.

2) If mafia doesn't want the spot light they will probably not claim nor use their mason powers, which is very good for town. For this same reason we must not go on a witch hunt on the claimed masons, because they can be of any alignment and may be all town as well. We shall lynch people because of suspicious behavior, not because of trying to find mafia withing the masons.

3) There is not much of a downside to it. If mafia wants to waste their roleblock/kill on mason by all means be my guest. It further protects our really important blue roles which is great. If they choose to ignore them we are back in the same place we we're before with extra info as town that mafia opted not to use. Which is great.


Here we have Sand making plans again. as well as budding up to players like protract and BC. Mass claiming Masons in this set up can be argued both ways as to whom it favors. In reality, it depends on how we go about it. These things are not scummy per say, but its how he is going about it that is. His motivations are for insuring his own safety, rather than scum hunting. which brings me to point 2.

Mayoral campaign and lynch

Sandroba wants to be mayor, and sandroba wants to lynch Cyriandor. This is what he says, but his actions say otherwise. Does anyone think sand was trying hard to get elected? Not from where I sit. His "campaign" is full of "Hey guys im good, elect me lawl im drunk!" He was running for mayor but had know intentions of getting elected. This allows him to push his "lynch", which Wont happen because he does not want to get elected. He does a great job of convincing us that Cyriandor is scum with powerful logic: "hes ugly and he smells bad". For added effect, he says it twice. Does anyone think that Sandroba is trying to convince town on his position? Because I can tell you he is not. His Modivation for these post is not one of getting scum lynch, but as a set up should Cyriandor flip later (whitch he knows is scum) to put him in a strong position. If he was town, He would have both tried harder to get elected and pushed Cyriandor harder.

Later in day 1 he sets up alternate lynches as well:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 16:34 sandroba wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:31 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:26 sandroba wrote:
Alright people I want to get elected and no one is fucking voting for me. What do you want me to do so you would fucking vote? Tell me and I'll do it. I have plenty of time right now and I can post random useless shit if that's what get's you voting.


Why ciryandor?

I think I talked about this already. He's ugly and smells bad. Also protact's case was the best thing to land on this thread so far. Also I might lynch a bg instead. Who knows.


Giving himself an out. not the town Sandroba I know.

*Sandroba's play is consistent with his day 1 scum play from previous games. He has proven he is willing to go out of his way to act very protown, both by pushing plans that can be in towns interest, as well as lightly busing his own teammates.

*Sandroba's Motivations are not to find scum, rather his over all behavior shows self preservation as his primary motivating factor in his posting. This is in direct opposition to what town Sandroba does. Town Sandroba does not have to worry about looking town because he finds scum. Scum Sandroba does, at it reflects in his behavior this game.

*Sandroba is Mafia

##Vote: Sandroba



In it I asserted that Sandroba's Mafia meta is to act really pro-town on day one, and then coast on that good will for days all the while doing nothing? Well, you'll never guess what Sandroba's been doing sense day 2! oh, that's right, NOTHING. I would like Foolishness, Protac, BC, and anyone else to give there thoughts on Sandroba. I will be pushing for his lynch.

As for a secondary lynch, Im not sure yet.


I know I want a lot of people dead, but you have struck me as really weird this game.

Since you're not scummy like you normally are, I think you actually are scum this game.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 02:30 GMT
#2488
On January 19 2012 10:53 Scamp wrote:
Guys stop relying on meta.


and rely on what?

Not doing anything?

Seriously, what have you done all game except whine about how other people play?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 02:34 GMT
#2490
to hiro: sandroba is temporarily off my "kill now" list.

High up on that list currently are:

BM
Toad
Scamp
GGQ

lower down on that list are:

you
VE
Jackal
Adam guy

probably all not scum, some are very likely just bad townies, but it would be nice to see all of these people die. Jackal mostly is on there for still not doing anything, VE is on there for...still not doing anything, Toad is on there for being super annoying and disruptive, while constantly using faces and in general having no balls or valuable opinions.

GGQ is on there cause he hasn't done anything.

BM is #1 on my kill list cause he fucking scares me with his retardedness.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 02:37 GMT
#2492
hey super I haven't heard from you in a while. What's new?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 02:45 GMT
#2494
well, in games of this size if you can't establish your towniness day 1 then mass genocide is the only solution.

There's too many scum to take the risk of just letting someone slide by.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 03:19 GMT
#2529
I agree 100% with Protact's list.

Also Toad apparently makes a living off of pointing out how many times I'm wrong. It's cute.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 03:20 GMT
#2533
##vote Toadesstern

##vote Bill Murray
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 04:11 GMT
#2571
On January 19 2012 13:10 Scamp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 13:04 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 19 2012 13:02 Scamp wrote:
Also for the record I highly doubt that Sheth used his vig shot because he said this earlier...


On January 15 2012 05:32 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
The exception to this, is please if you do shoot, post who you shot RIGHT at the deadline.



That actually looks more like he intended to use his shot - and thanks for pointing to the post that you used to snipe him Scamp U SO NICE!!!


You're welcome. Now stop playing like WBG and gain a little context for what you say.

The quote from Sheth was from day 1.


Reading over Kingjames filter has made me not want to vote for him.


you don't want to vote anyone.

You have 0 scumreads.

I wish I could kill you.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 04:15 GMT
#2576
On January 19 2012 13:13 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 13:11 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 19 2012 13:10 Scamp wrote:
On January 19 2012 13:04 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 19 2012 13:02 Scamp wrote:
Also for the record I highly doubt that Sheth used his vig shot because he said this earlier...


On January 15 2012 05:32 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
The exception to this, is please if you do shoot, post who you shot RIGHT at the deadline.



That actually looks more like he intended to use his shot - and thanks for pointing to the post that you used to snipe him Scamp U SO NICE!!!


You're welcome. Now stop playing like WBG and gain a little context for what you say.

The quote from Sheth was from day 1.


Reading over Kingjames filter has made me not want to vote for him.


you don't want to vote anyone.

You have 0 scumreads.

I wish I could kill you.

You want to kill me too.




nah not really. Not anymore.

I'm still on my phone, that's why my posts are kinda short. I'll do the rereadings and be back later with more stuffs.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 06:13 GMT
#2618
On January 19 2012 15:12 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 15:09 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
You/protact have correctly called out enough scum that if you guys really think Bill is scum I'll go with it


Scum.


fixed, kita bro

you gf by any chance?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 17:03 GMT
#2660
On January 20 2012 02:02 jaj22 wrote:
I'm having doubts about BM too. Maybe OpZ is right and he's just a bad player posting whatever random junk comes into his head.

Jitsu: What do you think? Any chance of a mason log?

Also I don't like anything in Protact's latest scumread post, which is scaring the shit out of me.



OpZ called BM scum the last time I checked...has something changed?

Why the hell are we trusting OpZ anyway? Or BM for that matter?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 19:07 GMT
#2686
On January 20 2012 03:50 jaj22 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 02:25 kingjames01 wrote:
On January 20 2012 00:24 jaj22 wrote:
@Lanaia: You want Bill to blow up two of Foolishness/Protact/BC?

What? Do YOU want Bill Murray to blow up two of those 3? Analyse Foolishness and Protactinium for yourself. They ARE and HAVE BEEN pro-Town from the beginning. Until that changes they should not be targetted.

That was my point. I should probably make those clearer.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 02:25 kingjames01 wrote:
What about Protactinium's latest post don't you like? Analyse it for us and tell us what you think.

Ok. I forgot about a couple of bits that I was fine with, so my statement was inaccurate. Here goes:

Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 11:59 Protactinium wrote:
GGQ is cool.

On January 18 2012 13:12 GGQ wrote:
Yeah so I hard defended macpo because I thought he posted like I did when I was new.

It's probably better to vig me tonight instead of wasting a lynch.


Mafia don't send out reminders that they defended mafia.
Mafia also don't ask to be vigged, since they can't influence vigs, but they certainly can influence lynches.
Nobody lynch him today, keke?

I covered this in another post:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=13201470

Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 11:59 Protactinium wrote:
BM. In contrast to BM's day 1 posting, his day 2 is abyssmal. Its also become less frequent too, which exactly fits my prediction if he is mafia, as his mafia play deteriorates rapidly (for cross reference, TL Mafia XXII where he is the mafia GF). And yes I should be one to know this read as I was mafia with him in that game.

This is absolutely true except that BM had a really spammy patch in day 2, so I'm not too sure about the frequency point yet. In TL Mafia XXII his post count crashes at the end of day 2 and stays low.

Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 11:59 Protactinium wrote:
Toadesstern
On January 19 2012 10:56 Toadesstern wrote:
I'd actually willing to lynch BM + GGQ tomorrow. I still think my case is good but I don't like the arguments of the people joining me :p
However I don't like the people telling me it's wrong either because there's nothing they got to say.
The only ones I like right now are people you are not commenting it at all but that's not helping me at all :p


Filter all of Toadesstern's posts. Search for all instances of GGQ. Confirm that Toadesstern has never made a case on GGQ, and has in fact been preventing his lynch all yesterday. "I still think my case is good"? Lol. Bullshit. See a trend here?

Also combine with my pressure yesterday, which showed that Toadesstern somehow knew what happened behind the scenes with sandroba influencing BC with Palmar's lynch.

What? Toad was trying to protect his scumbuddy GGQ and get his scumbuddies Sandroba and Macpo lynched instead? I don't buy the Palmar lynch influence knowledge point because it's quite plausible that Toad just jumped to a conclusion. I don't think it's even an illogical conclusion from the "compromise" post.

I'm guessing this is a pressure case because Protact can't get a read out of Toad's filter any more than I can

Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 11:59 Protactinium wrote:
Sandroba. Again, abyssmal day 2 posting compared to day 1. The case totally makes sense if you consider that Toadesstern somehow knows what goes on between sandroba/BC. As for explanations related to Ciryandor, yeah, mafia usually don't do that. But they do avoid pushing too hard where they can avoid it. Sandroba was never a viable mayor candidate, never votes for mayor (neutral, I suppose, but he doesn't vote for the person who brought up the Ciryandor case - read: me), and influences the Palmar lynch. Over Ciryandor, the person whose death he has supposedly been calling for all game in thread. Combined, these points outweigh his in thread support of Ciryandor. I know I vocally said he was town yesterday. But I lied. I only said that because I needed to get macpo lynched first lol.

I thought Sandroba's day 2 posting was better if anything. At least less trolly. Which mayor candidate was going to lynch Ciryandor? I thought Protactinium settled on Macpo. The Palmar lynch influence is a red mark but there was a plausible narrative based on Sandro's posts in the thread and the mason log.

Still not sure about Sandroba personally. I found a couple of his other town games: His LotR (town) filter looks much like his scum play, which this game does too, but his Mini Mafia X (town) posting was vastly superior. Actual care and effort put into posting. If he doesn't raise his game here I'll consider voting for him.

Show nested quote +
On January 19 2012 11:59 Protactinium wrote:
bumatlarge. His apathetic posting and general lack of enthusiasm is strikingly different from his usual active town play.

This meta-read is beyond me. Any other vets want to comment on Bum?



I would agree with the meta read on bum primarily because he actually tries to contribute to town discussion and scumhunting when he is town. So far he (like most players in this game) has done very little.

Bum also tends to shy away from spotlight when he is scum. This is very unlike his play, for example, from steamship or any other game where he is town.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 20:03 GMT
#2692
at this point it's pretty damning of kingjames to be so fervently pushing a random lynch we've never heard of.

Granted, this is exactly what he did in XLVIII, just always pushing random people who never had a chance of being lynched. Knowing this, though, it becomes hard to determine whether he is actually scum or just playing like he normally does

At this point I don't care because I don't think kingjames is the best kill for today. I'd much rather we kill BM and Toad.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 20:13 GMT
#2694
On January 20 2012 05:06 kingjames01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 05:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
at this point it's pretty damning of kingjames to be so fervently pushing a random lynch we've never heard of.

Granted, this is exactly what he did in XLVIII, just always pushing random people who never had a chance of being lynched. Knowing this, though, it becomes hard to determine whether he is actually scum or just playing like he normally does

At this point I don't care because I don't think kingjames is the best kill for today. I'd much rather we kill BM and Toad.


It's not random and you have heard of it. From me. Perhaps you just missed it.

You should go back and look at what I am pointing out. I've given quite detailed analyses as to why he has demonstrated mafia behaviour. Just take a look through the analysis and see what you think. It's quite apparent once you read through p4NDemik's history.


to be honest with you I haven't paid much attention to him. He's made a couple of questionable posts in terms of what he's actually looking for, but I don't think that makes him scum, just new.

The way he attacked me for what I was saying drew a lot of attention to him. I don't think as scum he would have done that.

I will be rereading the thread today again anyway, so I'll try to see if what you're saying has any merit.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 20:20 GMT
#2696
On January 20 2012 05:15 Lanaia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 05:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
at this point it's pretty damning of kingjames to be so fervently pushing a random lynch we've never heard of.

Granted, this is exactly what he did in XLVIII, just always pushing random people who never had a chance of being lynched. Knowing this, though, it becomes hard to determine whether he is actually scum or just playing like he normally does

At this point I don't care because I don't think kingjames is the best kill for today. I'd much rather we kill BM and Toad.


Do you think BM is lying about hatterism?


Toad's bothering me a bit. He keeps asserting himself as town because he's pegged people correctly. It's gotten to the point of overemphasis.
Tell me, guys, is this typical of town?
To me, it feels overeager. How I usually hunt scum is by looking for people who are overeager.
Toad is one of these people.
Gut is yelling at me to lynch him.
But gut alone probably will get me into trouble (as it has repeatedly before).

I'm voting Slardar.
I'm also going to vote GGQ because this has been a long time coming and I feel it is in our best interests to do so.


you actually believe his claim?

Honestly I don't believe I've found one thing that BM has said this entire game that makes a shred of sense.

As for Toad, yes, it's very atypical for townies. Why the hell are you voting slardar? Have you even had a scumread on him? Just use logic and common sense and build a case on Toad instead of voting random people.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 19 2012 21:15 GMT
#2701
On January 20 2012 05:30 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 05:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
at this point it's pretty damning of kingjames to be so fervently pushing a random lynch we've never heard of.

Granted, this is exactly what he did in XLVIII, just always pushing random people who never had a chance of being lynched. Knowing this, though, it becomes hard to determine whether he is actually scum or just playing like he normally does

At this point I don't care because I don't think kingjames is the best kill for today. I'd much rather we kill BM and Toad.


I'm going to go ahead and step in here WBG. I don't think it's damning at all to bring up "a random lynch we've never heard of" . Talk about the content of the case if you disagree with him. Do you find kingjames suspicious independently or are you just talking trash because some have expressed suspicion on him? Your basing your entire read, again, on meta if you say it's independent, and your meta reads are clearly fucking shit bro.

I suggest you speak to the content of his case. Maybe you'll see something I've missed. p4N's filter is pretty terribad. You're saying you disagree that the guy who spent 3 pages worth of clarifying why you were "speaking in third person" is suspicious? Are you going to do this right now WBG? AM I GONNA HAVE TO SMACK A BITCH WBG? AM I?


Like I just said, when he called me out he took a ton of attention. Perhaps he didn't mean to take that attention, but I feel like scum are less likely to what he did.

Also his tirade of "why are you talking in the third person" looked more like a new player not knowing what he's doing than a scum trying to force a mislynch.

At any rate I'll be back after class and will read stuff again, since I need to.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 00:23 GMT
#2737
On January 20 2012 08:38 GGQ wrote:
I think there's more that enough on BM to justify a vote right now.

The second vote is trickier, I'm considering supersoft and p4ndemic, but I'm not enthusiastic about lynching kingjames. No one seems to have noted that cyber_cheese's activity level is sharply decreased this day phase, which only furthers my suspicions of him.

Not that this determines his alignment one way or the other, but can WBG confirm that supersoft did, in fact, mason him?


wait wtf how do you know supersoft masoned me?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 00:25 GMT
#2739
On January 20 2012 08:35 Toadesstern wrote:
I'm actually going to place my 2nd vote on WBG and as mentioned earlier: I just got home after drinking a couple of beers with friends and will look into KJ's filter tomorrow. For now my vote is on wbg because NOONE except me and VE claimed a hit.
2 hits are missing, our sheriff claimed he has not sheriff'ed someone (also noone claimed to be locked up so far) => I should be pretty much a confirmed townie at this point imo. I don't see what's wrong with him and his style this game but this is just FAR too off to be just bad town.

##Unvote kingjames01
##Vote wherebugsgo


Take it as a placeholder while pointing a heavy fos in wbg's direction.


lol this is what I'm talking about.

This is like the most random vote I've ever seen. Plus, the only justification is "I'm a confirmed townie so I can do this and heavy FoS on WBG"

No reason. No logic.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 00:26 GMT
#2741
On January 20 2012 09:26 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 09:23 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 20 2012 08:38 GGQ wrote:
I think there's more that enough on BM to justify a vote right now.

The second vote is trickier, I'm considering supersoft and p4ndemic, but I'm not enthusiastic about lynching kingjames. No one seems to have noted that cyber_cheese's activity level is sharply decreased this day phase, which only furthers my suspicions of him.

Not that this determines his alignment one way or the other, but can WBG confirm that supersoft did, in fact, mason him?


wait wtf how do you know supersoft masoned me?

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 07:22 supersoft wrote:
pandemik. I am not mafia. I admit, that my activitylevel is poor. But that has to do with my role: I am mason.
I claim right now, because scum already has that information. I masoned L yesterday and he refused to talk to me.
He was never online when I was.
With that information it's quite easy for you to know who I masoned Day1. It obviously was WBG and we talked a lot about Palmar. Obviously.

From now on I'll be more active in the thread. Promised.

Game is easier if you actually read it.


his post was on the previous page, I just read this last one and was like wtf what did I miss lololol

I see it now.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 01:00 GMT
#2750
On January 20 2012 09:36 p4NDemik wrote:
I'd really like to see those logs wbg btw if possible. It seems very convenient that he masoned L but couldn't get him to talk. And it feels odd that he feels it necessary to give an excuse immediately after that. I also never brought his activity level into question in the first place.


I actually never ended up saving all the logs. This is all I have:

+ Show Spoiler +
[12:39] <supersoft> hi
[12:39] <wherebugsgo> hey
[12:39] <wherebugsgo> ok so
[12:39] <supersoft> wait, I just came home etc.
[12:39] <wherebugsgo> Jackal I think is town
[12:40] <supersoft> yay
[12:40] <supersoft> 10 more pages
[12:40] <wherebugsgo> lolol
[12:41] <wherebugsgo> I'm not sure about BC man
[12:41] <supersoft> sucks that we wont be able to communicate after the nightkills
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> yeah :/
[12:42] <supersoft> hmm
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> we should devise a way
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> to communicate
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> like
[12:42] <supersoft> last game he had this DT/Vig plan
[12:42] <supersoft> this game he discusses the masons to death
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> first letter of every post or something rofl
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> yeah but
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> iunno
[12:42] <wherebugsgo> actually now that I think about it
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> his play is no different
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> he had no real lynch target last time
[12:43] <supersoft> ahhhhh
[12:43] <supersoft> good idea
[12:43] <supersoft> but
[12:43] <supersoft> first letter
[12:43] <supersoft> :D
[12:43] <supersoft> we need a lot of posts
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> first letter of every line?
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> lol
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> nah
[12:43] <supersoft> hmm
[12:43] <supersoft> :D
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> could start a post with a keyword
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> and like
[12:43] <supersoft> no
[12:43] <wherebugsgo> the last line is the message
[12:43] <supersoft> i got an easy way
[12:44] <supersoft> a = 3
[12:44] <supersoft> b = g
[12:44] <supersoft> c = a
[12:44] <wherebugsgo> wtf lol
[12:44] <supersoft> lol
[12:44] <supersoft> but
[12:44] <supersoft> etc.
[12:44] <wherebugsgo> hmmm
[12:44] <wherebugsgo> LOL
[12:44] <wherebugsgo> I'll do a bunch of gibberish
[12:44] <wherebugsgo> aslkdjadslkajdlak
[12:44] <wherebugsgo> =
[12:45] <wherebugsgo> WTF THIS GUY IS SCUM KILL HIM
[12:45] <wherebugsgo> lool
[12:45] <supersoft> :D
[12:46] <supersoft> i mean
[12:46] <supersoft> most of the time we got no reason to hide what we say
[12:46] <supersoft> i'd be comfortable to talk like his in the thread
[12:46] <supersoft> but once i start posting single words
[12:46] <wherebugsgo> yeah agreed
[12:46] <supersoft> the hosts and fellowplayers will be pretty angry
[12:46] <wherebugsgo> we should
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> spontaneously start a discussion
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> in the middle of the day lol
[12:47] <supersoft> for important things
[12:47] <supersoft> like if we fake something
[12:47] <supersoft> e.g.
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> do yo uhave yesterday's logs?
[12:47] <supersoft> you fake vig
[12:47] <supersoft> no lol :D
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> fuuuuu
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> I don't either lol
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> I'm noob
[12:47] <supersoft> meh
[12:47] <wherebugsgo> oh w/e
[12:47] <supersoft> i thought you save them
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> forgot lol
[12:48] <supersoft> it's just a lot of "omg Palmar is so deep red"
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> LOL
[12:48] <supersoft> and "wtf?!"
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> yeah it's kinda useless now
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> but protact
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> BC
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> opz
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> like they all seem weird to me
[12:48] <supersoft> kkk lets filter these guys
[12:48] <wherebugsgo> I don't get a "this guy is town" read on anyone except like Jackal
[12:48] <supersoft> BM
[12:49] <supersoft> is kind of town in my eyes
[12:49] <wherebugsgo> hmmm
[12:49] <wherebugsgo> maybe
[12:49] <wherebugsgo> kita is almost town to me
[12:49] <wherebugsgo> problem is that he always looks the same
[12:49] <wherebugsgo> even as scum lol
[12:49] <supersoft> phew kita...
[12:50] <supersoft> I had lanaya on my townlist, too
[12:50] <wherebugsgo> iunno
[12:50] <supersoft> the only female player you know
[12:50] <wherebugsgo> you can't tell
[12:50] <wherebugsgo> what she is
[12:50] <wherebugsgo> I didn't know who she was a couple months ago so I talked to curu
[12:51] <supersoft> okay wait. Let's make a short list of players
[12:51] <supersoft> we work through and discuss
[12:51] <supersoft> BC, Prot, opz
[12:51] <wherebugsgo> ok
[12:51] <wherebugsgo> BC what I don't like
[12:51] <supersoft> :D
[12:51] <wherebugsgo> is he didn't comment on Palmar
[12:51] <wherebugsgo> before lynching him
[12:51] <wherebugsgo> otherwise I'm mostly ok with BC
[12:52] <supersoft> that is correct. Someone pointed that out in the thread
[12:52] <supersoft> i think it was toadesstern
[12:52] <supersoft> ". Really weak opinion and taking his own responsibility out of the equation, because he wasn’t the one who pushed for Palmar." - jayjay
[12:52] <supersoft> it was jayjay
[12:52] <wherebugsgo> ok yeah
[12:53] <wherebugsgo> that guy I think is town too
[12:53] <wherebugsgo> all the noobies
[12:53] <wherebugsgo> who keep talking in the thread
[12:53] <wherebugsgo> look pretty town
[12:53] <supersoft> 5) Hydra Talks a billion times about why to lynch BC, makes a good case. Gets my vote, I go to sleep and he switches to Macpo? Nice. That doesn’t exactly convey trust. I don’t like it.
[12:53] <supersoft> there is some good stuff in his post
[12:53] <wherebugsgo> LOL
[12:53] <supersoft> we had this point yesterday
[12:53] <wherebugsgo> yeah bumatlarge immediately "regreted" his thing
[12:54] <wherebugsgo> his vote for protact
[12:54] <supersoft> ah no toadesstern wants to lynch you
[12:54] <wherebugsgo> idc
[12:54] <supersoft> kurumi
[12:54] <wherebugsgo> he's not going to be able to lynch me
[12:55] <supersoft> I fucking regret voting Protact. - kurumi
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> I think kurumi is scum
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> idk why
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> or no actually
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> he's too active
[12:55] <supersoft> naah
[12:55] <supersoft> yes
[12:55] <supersoft> his jokes etc.
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> yeah
[12:55] <supersoft> he does that as town a lot
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> yep
[12:55] <wherebugsgo> so he's town
[12:56] <supersoft> etc.
[12:56] <supersoft> "are you the singing kind of guy"
[12:56] <wherebugsgo> LOL
[12:56] <supersoft> mhm i think so :D
[12:57] <supersoft> risk.nuke
[12:58] <wherebugsgo> you think he's suspicious?
[12:58] <supersoft> i am undecided
[12:58] <supersoft> he played terrible last game
[12:58] <supersoft> idk
[12:58] <supersoft> his mayoral campaign
[12:59] <wherebugsgo> I think he's townish
[12:59] <supersoft> it somehow fits in his
[12:59] <supersoft> overconfident
[12:59] <supersoft> townstyle
[12:59] <wherebugsgo> ye
[12:59] <supersoft> okay
[12:59] <wherebugsgo> this post:
[12:59] <wherebugsgo> Yeah, when a person is about to face lynching thats a different situation but I shouldn't need to explain everything as if you were in kindergarten most people here are adults with a higher then average iq. Saying you have a townread on someone who isn't under suspicion or face the threat of a lynch is superbad townplay. Saying you have a townread on someone under suspicion is also bad play because if they are under suspicion that's great. That means they won't ge
[12:59] <wherebugsgo> makes him look town
[13:00] <supersoft> okay good
[13:00] <supersoft> i am sorting the players right now
[13:00] <supersoft> :-P
[13:02] <supersoft> ahm i need your opinion on toadesstern
[13:03] <wherebugsgo> let me reread his posts real quick
[13:03] <supersoft> he has this huge posts style
[13:03] <supersoft> so annying to read through
[13:05] <supersoft> he got 6 pages...
[13:05] <supersoft> what the fuck. I list him as unable to read.
[13:05] <wherebugsgo> yeah
[13:06] <wherebugsgo> I just noticed LOL
[13:06] <supersoft> okay
[13:06] <wherebugsgo> he looks
[13:06] <wherebugsgo> more town than scum to me
[13:07] <supersoft> maybe i mason him
[13:07] <supersoft> he's german
[13:07] <supersoft> I will be able to interview him
[13:07] <wherebugsgo> yes
[13:07] <supersoft> if he's scum it'll be really tough
[13:07] <wherebugsgo> yes]
[13:07] <wherebugsgo> you knew his alignment
[13:07] <wherebugsgo> in my/incog's game?
[13:08] <supersoft> yes
[13:08] <wherebugsgo> ok
[13:08] <wherebugsgo> his posts
[13:08] <wherebugsgo> look somewhat similar
[13:08] <wherebugsgo> but iunno
[13:08] <supersoft> yes
[13:08] <supersoft> these long posts
[13:08] <wherebugsgo> like I'm not 100% sure
[13:09] <wherebugsgo> can you find any post
[13:09] <wherebugsgo> that you find by him to be suspicious
[13:10] <supersoft> I still agree with sandroba about the mass claim however.
[13:10] <supersoft> I'm going with sheth here. It's nice that we got this discussion going and got some information we can work with but I'd like toget back to our mayor candidates.
[13:10] <wherebugsgo> oh shit
[13:10] <supersoft> everything
[13:10] <wherebugsgo> sandro
[13:11] <supersoft> is so
[13:11] <supersoft> pfff
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> sandro was the one who wanted mass claim
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> ?
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> WTF
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> why did I not notice that
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> we should kill him
[13:11] <supersoft> mhm
[13:11] <supersoft> :D
[13:11] <supersoft> you told me he deserves a second chance
[13:11] <supersoft> :D
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> he hasn't done anything
[13:11] <supersoft> yes
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> yeah
[13:11] <wherebugsgo> well
[13:12] <wherebugsgo> he got his second chance
[13:12] <supersoft> his second chance is tomorrow
[13:12] <wherebugsgo> lol exactly
[13:12] <wherebugsgo> tonight too
[13:12] <supersoft> at the end of the day he's either active or dead
[13:12] <wherebugsgo> bet you he'll post something really small
[13:12] <wherebugsgo> before end of night
[13:13] <wherebugsgo> foolishness?
[13:13] <wherebugsgo> what do you think of him
[13:13] <supersoft> haha probably
[13:13] <supersoft> nothing
[13:13] <supersoft> i've never played with him
[13:13] <wherebugsgo> hmm same :/
[13:13] <supersoft> surpisingly
[13:13] <supersoft> i
[13:13] <wherebugsgo> nah we played XLIV
[13:13] <wherebugsgo> he was in that game
[13:13] <supersoft> i dont remember
[13:13] <supersoft> yes but
[13:14] <wherebugsgo> he caught mig day 1
[13:14] <supersoft> ahhh
[13:14] <supersoft> that game
[13:14] <supersoft> i remember
[13:14] <supersoft> yes
[13:14] <supersoft> uh thats a long time ago
[13:14] <wherebugsgo> that was my first game lol
[13:15] <wherebugsgo> ok my question is
[13:15] <supersoft> kk
[13:15] <wherebugsgo> why did toad have a stubborn Palmar read
[13:15] <wherebugsgo> when there was no reason to believe so
[13:15] <wherebugsgo> how does a noob
[13:15] <wherebugsgo> have a better read on Palmar
[13:15] <wherebugsgo> than me + you + Jackal?
[13:15] <supersoft> okay
[13:15] <supersoft> thats a valid point
[13:15] <supersoft> makes him pretty scummy
[13:16] <supersoft> i really think there is no reason to think that palmar was town
[13:16] <wherebugsgo> he voted BM too
[13:16] <wherebugsgo> http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&currentpage=57#1122
[13:17] <supersoft> hmm brb
[13:19] <wherebugsgo> his first post
[13:19] <wherebugsgo> about how he thinks someone is scum
[13:19] <wherebugsgo> came just now
[13:19] <wherebugsgo> about sandro or bum
[13:19] <wherebugsgo> and he still says nothing
[13:27] <supersoft> well okay
[13:27] <supersoft> i guess i wont mason him
[13:27] <supersoft> its better to mason someone
[13:28] <supersoft> i can discuss the game with
[13:28] <wherebugsgo> yes
[13:28] <wherebugsgo> well you could if you want
[13:28] <wherebugsgo> to confirm him as scum
[13:28] <supersoft> hmm
[13:29] <supersoft> you think i should
[13:29] <wherebugsgo> I dunno
[13:29] <wherebugsgo> it's up to you
[13:29] <wherebugsgo> who would you mason instead?
[13:30] <supersoft> L ?
[13:31] <wherebugsgo> sure that works
[13:31] <wherebugsgo> you could mason Foolish
[13:31] <wherebugsgo> if he's alive
[13:31] <supersoft> okay
[13:31] <supersoft> i guess its better to chose one of these active people
[13:32] <wherebugsgo> kita maybe
[13:32] <supersoft> naah
[13:33] <wherebugsgo> ok LoL match brb
[13:34] <supersoft> :D
[13:35] <supersoft> same here
[13:35] <supersoft> lol
[13:35] <supersoft> sorry ^_^
[14:23] <supersoft> okay sorry
[14:23] <supersoft> can you copy paste me the dialogue? ^^
[14:44] <wherebugsgo> ?
[14:44] <supersoft> everything we talked about like 1 hour ago :D
[14:45] <wherebugsgo> I'll send it by pm


wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 01:03 GMT
#2751
it's possible supersoft is scum.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 02:03 GMT
#2770
On January 20 2012 10:56 Jitsu wrote:
Home from class. Just read thread. Interesting to see Supersoft flip scum as well.


LOL WUT
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 20 2012 02:30 GMT
#2790
On January 20 2012 11:13 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
also, 8 confirmed people running around in pms is ridiculous -_-


how are the masons confirmed, exactly? Unless I'm missing something, can't the scum be masons too?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 01:15 GMT
#3139
Where is sandroba? Why is BM not getting lynched? His claim is terrible. People are pussying out on lynching BM just because of his claim? dafak?

Sandro still hasn't done anything, so I think it's actually likely he is scum. What about Toad, though? Is he getting off just because he said to kill sandro?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 01:26 GMT
#3150
On January 21 2012 10:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
WBG I want to lynch you bro! You wanna fight about it?


Nah, waste of my time.

I'm willing to lynch sandro, if he comes up anything but red we lynch hiro right after, especially because hiro has been playing quite out of his normal character. Of course, I doubt he'd have the balls to claim like this as scum, but it's still worth something.

##unvote Toadesstern

##vote Sandroba


As for the other one, someone needs to explain why we are not killing BM and who we are killing instead. Otherwise, my vote is going to stay on him. I don't just like keeping people around because they blue claimed.

Also, the blue claim didn't make much sense for me because a mad hatter wouldn't want to be in office unless he intended on getting himself lynched. A mad hatter is one of the hardest roles to play; you play to get yourself shot by scum, and if you're in office that's impossible.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 01:39 GMT
#3158
Alright, so if we're wrong about BM we lose two townies. I can understand the sentiment now I suppose. However, if any of these people flip town we need to kill BM tomorrow at all costs.

##unvote Bill Murray

##vote kingjames01


Let's see what kingjames flips, since there isn't enough time for a new case. I'd like to see sandro flip as well.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 02:00 GMT
#3168
On January 21 2012 10:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
I like how I'm like, marked for death tonight and no one gives a shit what I say.

Cool guys. Consider this my last post.


why the fuck do you always think you're going to get shot?

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 03:26 GMT
#3243
hmm I shouldn't have voted kingjames, he was playing too much like he did in XLVIII; just randomly bringing up people for lynch who had no chance of actually dying.

With that said, I want to take a closer look at bum because of how hard he defended sandro. I also still want to look at Toad because something still is weird about him. Bussing sandro isn't the hardest thing in the world to do, because sandro has 0 confidence in his scum play. It has happened before, even.

Thus, we should be careful with what types of conclusions we draw in retrospect about the sandro lynch. Sandro getting bussed was a very likely possibility.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 03:36 GMT
#3251
On January 21 2012 12:28 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2012 12:26 wherebugsgo wrote:
hmm I shouldn't have voted kingjames, he was playing too much like he did in XLVIII; just randomly bringing up people for lynch who had no chance of actually dying.

With that said, I want to take a closer look at bum because of how hard he defended sandro. I also still want to look at Toad because something still is weird about him. Bussing sandro isn't the hardest thing in the world to do, because sandro has 0 confidence in his scum play. It has happened before, even.

Thus, we should be careful with what types of conclusions we draw in retrospect about the sandro lynch. Sandro getting bussed was a very likely possibility.


Why not take a look into risk.nuke if people who defended Sand are on your radar? He HARD defended Sand in one of his LAST posts. Did you miss that one? Why bum with his soft defend?


cause soft-defending is more indicative of scum than hard defending. If you hard defend someone you get a fuck ton of attention when you're wrong. Bum is just kinda sliding around doing nothing.


On January 21 2012 12:29 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2012 12:26 wherebugsgo wrote:
hmm I shouldn't have voted kingjames, he was playing too much like he did in XLVIII; just randomly bringing up people for lynch who had no chance of actually dying.

With that said, I want to take a closer look at bum because of how hard he defended sandro. I also still want to look at Toad because something still is weird about him. Bussing sandro isn't the hardest thing in the world to do, because sandro has 0 confidence in his scum play. It has happened before, even.

Thus, we should be careful with what types of conclusions we draw in retrospect about the sandro lynch. Sandro getting bussed was a very likely possibility.


You voted for KJ because he was playing the way he was in a game where he was town? You get RIGHT out of town bro. You GET OUT! GET OUT OF TOWN WBG!!


he was dead either way, I wanted to ensure he flipped because I've been wrong quite a bit this game.

At any rate I reassured myself that my meta reads aren't all shit, so at least that's good.

We should definitely look into the people who voted KJ through the day for bad reasons, though. This group is bound to have scum in it because they could have been trying to keep sandro alive.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 04:18 GMT
#3268
On January 21 2012 13:05 bumatlarge wrote:
And for those who are suspicious of me, it feels deserved. I made a bad read and banked on it. I don't think it hurt the town at all, so I'd implore you to look at it from my perspective as a townie. The 3 vets switching from BM to sandroba was the right call, and my neurotic side did not like it. I'll try to improve my play to whats expected of me soon. No more dumb factors


I don't have a huge prob with you as long as you are active and helping today.

What interests me is this:

Votes for BloodyC0bbler (11) First
Meapak_Ziphh
risk.nuke
GGQ
zeks
Lanaia
glurio
Cyber_Cheese
Foolishness
supersoft
wherebugsgo
VisceraEyes

I know I'm town, VE strikes me as town. On day 1 I thought supersoft was town but he has yet to do anything so I'm wary of him.

Meapak has been acting weird, GGQ has been called scum, zeks has done nothing, Lanaia is scummy, glurio is a lurker, Cyber Cheese needs no explanation, Foolishness is probably town.

Sandro voted BC in thread and flipped scum.

Brown Bear didn't vote and he very well might be scum for not doing anything so far.

Foolishness, what do you think of this vote list?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 04:20 GMT
#3269
Foolishness
hiro protagonist
Protactinium
BloodyC0bbler (x3)
Scamp
glurio

vaderseven
Slardar
jaj22
Bill Murray
supersoft
rgTheSchworz

EchelonTee
Lanaia
Toadesstern
GGQ
~OpZ~
bumatlarge


people I don't like on KJ's vote list
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 04:27 GMT
#3274
On January 21 2012 13:23 Lanaia wrote:
WBG, besides the obvious wishywashyness, what else makes me scummy to you?

Also, may I ask exactly how you feel about slardar?


I haven't paid attention to slardar at all. I'll read his posts soon.

I guess you're always scummy to me because you don't push your reads with conviction. Yesterday I recall you posted something I liked, so I'm inclined to believe you're more town since then.

Also in retrospect when I reread XLVII I saw that there were some differences from there to here and some more similarities from Steamship to here. So at the moment I'm content with calling you town. I'm just not confident with that read. (in other words, there are far better targets for tomorrow)

Meapak for now looks fairly townie to me too but he was very suspicious to me earlier yesterday.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 10:18 GMT
#3287
On January 21 2012 17:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Foolishness amend the list please. I strongly believe atm WBG has a high chance of flipping red.

I would place glurio higher on your list. I also believe that based on play, opz is far more likely to be red.


I'd love to hear this one.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 10:18 GMT
#3288
On January 21 2012 18:17 Bill Murray wrote:
yeah lynch me when i was all over sandroba, and didnt want to lynch kingjames
sandroba flipping red makes you look terrible
foolishness's list is a joke, I am seriously doubting both of your abilities to lead the town right now, so I'm going to have to take over the reigns, gentlemen.


stfu.

you're a detriment to town at best.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 13:58 GMT
#3320
On January 21 2012 22:51 rgTheSchworz wrote:

I'm not asking you to jail hiro, I'm asking hiro to claim being jailed regardless of your choice this night.
This is to assure we're lynching you, scum.
You have escaped lynching yesterday by BS-ing us.I think that's unfair.

Stop bending what i say, I believed protact was bussing, I was not 100% sure. Unlikely, now that L has flipped red.




How does L flipping red make it unlikely that Protact was bussing Macpo?

How does anything you say make sense?

Also, I really desire that we lynch BM tomorrow. The fact that he got elected is actually pissing me off right now.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 21 2012 16:20 GMT
#3334
On January 21 2012 23:26 risk.nuke wrote:
*Reminder*
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2012 12:22 risk.nuke wrote:
On January 21 2012 12:20 Scamp wrote:
One out of two is still pretty good. I'm relieved.

Vig's. steady. aim. fire.

*Reminder*


I'd be so down for this. It's too bad I don't have a gun.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 01:51 GMT
#3393
On January 22 2012 07:39 VisceraEyes wrote:
WBG's town beta is based on drawing logical conclusions based on evidence from checks/flips. His game this game is to jump to conclusions based on meta. This game is NOT like his standard town meta aside from him being jerky toward anyone who questions/suspects him. You're being obtuse Protact, and I think you're better than this. Look again bro.


This is probably the most ironic fucking thing in the entire thread.

You accuse me of solely jumping to conclusions based on meta, whereas for me you do the exact same thing. So it's not okay for me to try to use meta to pin people, but it's completely fine for you to base a case entirely on meta?

Yeah, that's not completely contradictory or anything...

The sad part is I actually believe you're town.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 02:32 GMT
#3400
On January 14 2012 16:46 sandroba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 16:31 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:26 sandroba wrote:
Alright people I want to get elected and no one is fucking voting for me. What do you want me to do so you would fucking vote? Tell me and I'll do it. I have plenty of time right now and I can post random useless shit if that's what get's you voting.

Turn everything you do into about 3 paragraphs, even if it could have been a line.

I was walking down the street one day and I suddenly a foul scent hit my nose. I was like what the shit, where the fuck is this coming from? Did I just step on human fesses or what? After checking my feet and realizing it was clean I looked around and spotted a horrid looking creature that dropped 2 terrible posts in the begging of a game then was never heard of again. It was ciryandor. Protact had warned me about his unpleasant presence. Right then I decided I would rid the world of such disturbing annoyance and thus I hit him repeatedly over the head with my grandma's shoes. He finally succumbed, bored into oblivion. I felt victorious after checking my grandma's shoes and realizing a crimson taint had soaked them. Life was good. Being mayor made me proud. The whole idea of being elected to kill some random dude and being able to single handedly execute it was exciting. I stretched out my arm and an eagle landed on it. Fuck yes I'm a boss.


I just want to remind people that this is probably the fucking funniest thing I've ever read while going back through people's posts.

I laughed so hard at this LOL.

Anyway, something funny that struck me from sandro's filter is this:


On January 18 2012 03:27 sandroba wrote:
Although I'm not entirely convinced that macpo is sure mafia due to sheer terribleness of his insane rambling, we still have to get rid of him at some point due to the amount of players suspicious of him. This talk about no opposition to his lynch is in no way indicative of him being innocent. Mafia is not likely to openly oppose a lynch that has so much support and so far only 28 out of 44 voters have cast their votes. Still I feel way more confident lynching GGQ or L. Double lynch needs at least 9 more votes to go through and I'd really like to get at least one red killed today.


Like, all the people sandro wants to lynch, I'm pretty sure, were scum; most likely scum that he felt he could not defend any longer. This is actually what sandro does as scum; he busses people like hell because he thinks they are super obvious scum to everyone.

Macpo he could not defend because Foolish/Protact attacked him. L he could not defend because everyone saw he was playing the same way he played in Responsibility. Is it a stretch to say that he could not defend GGQ either? I don't think so.

Also note how he tells myself, super, and toad to "get off my balls." This makes all 3 of us look far more town.

On January 17 2012 01:26 sandroba wrote:
@BC LOL man you could have redacted a few parts from that shit that I don't even remember talking about.

WBG, supersoft and toadstem need to get off my balls. My weekends are pretty busy and I did my best with the little time I had. I don't even know why the fuck you are calling me mafia on the first place.

As for who I think is mafia I got GGQ, Jackal and rgtICEMAN. I'm going to read dead guy's filters before I choose which one to push today, but they could very easily be all mafia. Brb.


Also note how he later rescinds his opinion about Jackal (he flips from day 1 liking Jackal to not liking Jackal to being unsure)

On January 17 2012 03:28 sandroba wrote:
I'm not quite sure on him because jackal is freaking jackal, but last time he was town i could tell right away and he did put in some effort and got killed early on. He just seems lazy and jumping on convenient stuff and he is back to his usual useless one line posting which he used to do as both alignments. He's either made a step back or he is scum this game, I need more to decide accurately, but I'm leaning scum on him atm.


whereas for L, GGQ, Macpo, and Ciryandor he's just like "fuck man this guy's scum he smells fucking bad kill him" The only exception is when Macpo is seriously close to dying, then he sheds some doubt on the lynch.

Meapak, I think, has been correct about GGQ this entire time, but just hasn't been going about it properly. Of course, our job is easy; if GGQ is not scum, I'm almost 100% sure Meapak is, because that's the only target he's tunneled. The reason I say this is because Meapak has had several days to contribute and yet he's always been focused on tunneling GGQ. Normally I'd be uncomfortable with aligning flips like that, and certainly if GGQ is town it'd be difficult to lynch Meapak (since there are things in Meapak's filter, notably what he said about L, that make him look town) but I think we have to consider the big picture instead of letting little things prevent us from making hard decisions.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 02:33 GMT
#3401
On January 22 2012 11:32 vaderseven wrote:
When does the next day start?


less than 30 minutes I think.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 02:37 GMT
#3403
On January 22 2012 11:33 p4NDemik wrote:
Foolishness has been pretty worthless town to boot if you look at his history. He's only unquestioned because he's tight with Protact/BC. He's been building many lists but not making many strong cases. On my bad guy list atm.


the thing that bothers me most about Foolish is the fact that he hasn't died.

I would expect mafia to triple stack him if necessary, since he's obviously been correct about at least two or three scum now.

This is actually what bothers me a lot about this game and it's been messing with my head for a while. By all means, at least one of Protact/Foolishness should have died by now. Also, if BM was scum and BC was town I'm sure the bodyguards would've started dying too.

None of these things have happened, which is concerning me right now. It could very well mean BC is scum or both BC and BM are town. Right now I feel like I don't have a proper handle on the alignments of the "biggest" veterans in the game and that concerns me deeply.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 02:41 GMT
#3406
On January 22 2012 11:41 kitaman27 wrote:
You see BC as a power role? The guy who spent the entire game talking about his mason claim?


why have you done next to nothing for the past...I dunno...ever?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 02:45 GMT
#3409
On January 22 2012 11:44 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2012 11:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 22 2012 11:41 kitaman27 wrote:
You see BC as a power role? The guy who spent the entire game talking about his mason claim?


why have you done next to nothing for the past...I dunno...ever?


You think I'm scum bugs?


I dunno wtf you are, your play as both alignments is really good.

But then, as town this game you've done next to nothing. So, that just leaves good scum play. o_O

Tell me, who do you think is scum right now and why?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 03:02 GMT
#3413
alright, cool.

So these kills are interesting. Why Scamp and GGQ? Wtf?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 03:08 GMT
#3418
On January 22 2012 12:06 Toadesstern wrote:
Mr. meapak. didn't you call me scum because I was trying to safe a scumbuddy when proposing to lynch Sandroba d1/d2 and said that the sandroba case is nothing but a poor defence to safe GGQs ass?
After macpo flipped you even told people to look into people who tried to safe macpo by proposing to lynch Sandroba because Sandroba clearly was just a distraction and you still pushing GGQ while people were switching to macpo was fine.

I don't want to make this sound OMGUS but you need to die.


lol this is like the most forced and set up thing I've ever seen

If Meapak was scum why the fuck would he shoot GGQ and deprive himself of his only target? It's wifomy but I seriously doubt he would tunnel the same guy for like 72 hours and then turn around and allow his team to shoot the guy.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 03:35 GMT
#3426
On January 22 2012 12:10 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2012 12:08 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 22 2012 12:06 Toadesstern wrote:
Mr. meapak. didn't you call me scum because I was trying to safe a scumbuddy when proposing to lynch Sandroba d1/d2 and said that the sandroba case is nothing but a poor defence to safe GGQs ass?
After macpo flipped you even told people to look into people who tried to safe macpo by proposing to lynch Sandroba because Sandroba clearly was just a distraction and you still pushing GGQ while people were switching to macpo was fine.

I don't want to make this sound OMGUS but you need to die.


lol this is like the most forced and set up thing I've ever seen

If Meapak was scum why the fuck would he shoot GGQ and deprive himself of his only target? It's wifomy but I seriously doubt he would tunnel the same guy for like 72 hours and then turn around and allow his team to shoot the guy.


didn't you say 1 page ago that if GGQ flips green we have to insta-lynch meapak? How did you change your mind so fast?


HAHAHA

trolled you biatch!

I see what the scumteam is doing. They're trying to lock down the lynch on Meapak today.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 04:42 GMT
#3476
Jackal, you on crack bro?

I never talked to sandro.

##vote Bill Murray

Also Toad is annoying
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 04:50 GMT
#3479
On January 22 2012 13:46 p4NDemik wrote:

You weren't duped at all. You never believed him.


This is actually a very good point. I can't think of anyone with half a brain who would've actually believed BM's claim in the way that he made it.

Problem I have right now is that BM very well could just be super bad town. I'm so torn it's annoying. I just want to kill him now, since he can't say "oh well I have a bomb on Protact! herp derp"
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 22 2012 05:27 GMT
#3497
LOL Jackal.

At least we know he's town now. I see no way a scum would notice that and then call me out on it, cause it takes a lot of reading just to see it.

Jackal what do you think about lynching BM?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 00:25 GMT
#3685
On January 23 2012 05:00 hiro protagonist wrote:
Yes, I realize my actions helped keep BM alive day3. I will not make the same mistake, Of course I will help you lynch Bill today. I thought It was obvious in my last post thats what I wanted to do. I also want to re read the thread, which is what Im doing now. better to check twice than make a rash decision at this point. also, everyone should vote for the DL today.

##Vote: Bill Murry
##Vote: Double Lynch

As for the results of my day 2 check, I will release that if it becomes relivent. As for now, I Have a good reason for keeping that info quite


what the fuck
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 00:31 GMT
#3687
On January 22 2012 23:30 supersoft wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2012 11:32 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:46 sandroba wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:31 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:26 sandroba wrote:
Alright people I want to get elected and no one is fucking voting for me. What do you want me to do so you would fucking vote? Tell me and I'll do it. I have plenty of time right now and I can post random useless shit if that's what get's you voting.

Turn everything you do into about 3 paragraphs, even if it could have been a line.

I was walking down the street one day and I suddenly a foul scent hit my nose. I was like what the shit, where the fuck is this coming from? Did I just step on human fesses or what? After checking my feet and realizing it was clean I looked around and spotted a horrid looking creature that dropped 2 terrible posts in the begging of a game then was never heard of again. It was ciryandor. Protact had warned me about his unpleasant presence. Right then I decided I would rid the world of such disturbing annoyance and thus I hit him repeatedly over the head with my grandma's shoes. He finally succumbed, bored into oblivion. I felt victorious after checking my grandma's shoes and realizing a crimson taint had soaked them. Life was good. Being mayor made me proud. The whole idea of being elected to kill some random dude and being able to single handedly execute it was exciting. I stretched out my arm and an eagle landed on it. Fuck yes I'm a boss.


I just want to remind people that this is probably the fucking funniest thing I've ever read while going back through people's posts.

I laughed so hard at this LOL.

Anyway, something funny that struck me from sandro's filter is this:


On January 18 2012 03:27 sandroba wrote:
Although I'm not entirely convinced that macpo is sure mafia due to sheer terribleness of his insane rambling, we still have to get rid of him at some point due to the amount of players suspicious of him. This talk about no opposition to his lynch is in no way indicative of him being innocent. Mafia is not likely to openly oppose a lynch that has so much support and so far only 28 out of 44 voters have cast their votes. Still I feel way more confident lynching GGQ or L. Double lynch needs at least 9 more votes to go through and I'd really like to get at least one red killed today.


Like, all the people sandro wants to lynch, I'm pretty sure, were scum; most likely scum that he felt he could not defend any longer. This is actually what sandro does as scum; he busses people like hell because he thinks they are super obvious scum to everyone.

Macpo he could not defend because Foolish/Protact attacked him. L he could not defend because everyone saw he was playing the same way he played in Responsibility. Is it a stretch to say that he could not defend GGQ either? I don't think so.

Also note how he tells myself, super, and toad to "get off my balls." This makes all 3 of us look far more town.

On January 17 2012 01:26 sandroba wrote:
@BC LOL man you could have redacted a few parts from that shit that I don't even remember talking about.

WBG, supersoft and toadstem need to get off my balls. My weekends are pretty busy and I did my best with the little time I had. I don't even know why the fuck you are calling me mafia on the first place.

As for who I think is mafia I got GGQ, Jackal and rgtICEMAN. I'm going to read dead guy's filters before I choose which one to push today, but they could very easily be all mafia. Brb.


Also note how he later rescinds his opinion about Jackal (he flips from day 1 liking Jackal to not liking Jackal to being unsure)

On January 17 2012 03:28 sandroba wrote:
I'm not quite sure on him because jackal is freaking jackal, but last time he was town i could tell right away and he did put in some effort and got killed early on. He just seems lazy and jumping on convenient stuff and he is back to his usual useless one line posting which he used to do as both alignments. He's either made a step back or he is scum this game, I need more to decide accurately, but I'm leaning scum on him atm.


whereas for L, GGQ, Macpo, and Ciryandor he's just like "fuck man this guy's scum he smells fucking bad kill him" The only exception is when Macpo is seriously close to dying, then he sheds some doubt on the lynch.

Meapak, I think, has been correct about GGQ this entire time, but just hasn't been going about it properly. Of course, our job is easy; if GGQ is not scum, I'm almost 100% sure Meapak is, because that's the only target he's tunneled. The reason I say this is because Meapak has had several days to contribute and yet he's always been focused on tunneling GGQ. Normally I'd be uncomfortable with aligning flips like that, and certainly if GGQ is town it'd be difficult to lynch Meapak (since there are things in Meapak's filter, notably what he said about L, that make him look town) but I think we have to consider the big picture instead of letting little things prevent us from making hard decisions.



wbg please tell me how you meant that red bolded statement.


basically, sandro flipped scum, right?

So far all the people he has called out have actually flipped scum. The exception is GGQ, and that's pretty much because everyone was calling out GGQ (he also expressed doubt about GGQ but didn't about anyone else).

Now, it makes the 3 of us look more town, but I don't think it means much more than that. I took it with a heavy grain of salt, since sandro called out GGQ and he was town, Toad could very well still be scum and he could have just been saying stuff in thread just for the hell of it.

Also I read your logs with Toad and I lol'd at the part you guys talked about me LOL. Toad ist ein Pimmelzwerg!

Also, what do you think of Toad at this point? What did you get from that conversation?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 00:37 GMT
#3689
On January 23 2012 09:33 rgTheSchworz wrote:
Don't argue about probabilities. I don't think L's and sandro's flip have any implications on BC/foolish 's alignment.


who do you want to lynch and why?

You say one of VE and hiro is scum...but no vote?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 02:35 GMT
#3701
lul one of ze germans is scum

KILL ZEM! KILL ZEM ALL
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 02:43 GMT
#3705
On January 23 2012 11:40 Toadesstern wrote:
yeah I'm translating right now, give me a moment. WBG can check it afterwards


I'm not even fluent in German, I can just understand the gist of it lol

at any rate the log isn't terribly important to our needs. I care more about what supersoft thinks about you right now.

The problem I'm having with supersoft is that he's still minimally contributing in the thread. There are scum masons, and it's not like we've actually had the balls to kill one of the confirmed masons yet. We KNOW they're masons, sure, that's great, but we don't know their alignments. They can't all be town IMO.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 07:30 GMT
#3722
I agree that glurio looks really bad.

However, BM dies today. There is no question about it, he dies today because his play has been wtf bad and he hasn't jailed people. Like, not jailing people when we elected you to do that, and the one time he jails it's a terrible jail.

And also he blackmails all of town into not lynching him by claiming mad hatter and saying the bomb is on Protact. Seriously?

At this point it is still possible he is town, but for someone to have played this anti-town all game, I don't care how retarded town you might be, you need to die. It's detrimental for us to leave him alive because he'll consume all our discussion time from here on out. People will keep coming back to him because his play has just created the atmosphere of "ok wtf do we do with this guy?"
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 07:56 GMT
#3727
On January 23 2012 16:36 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2012 16:30 wherebugsgo wrote:
I agree that glurio looks really bad.

However, BM dies today. There is no question about it, he dies today because his play has been wtf bad and he hasn't jailed people. Like, not jailing people when we elected you to do that, and the one time he jails it's a terrible jail.

And also he blackmails all of town into not lynching him by claiming mad hatter and saying the bomb is on Protact. Seriously?

At this point it is still possible he is town, but for someone to have played this anti-town all game, I don't care how retarded town you might be, you need to die. It's detrimental for us to leave him alive because he'll consume all our discussion time from here on out. People will keep coming back to him because his play has just created the atmosphere of "ok wtf do we do with this guy?"

Lynching him just because his play has been wtf bad is bad. Lynching mafia for being mafia is good. Lynch Meapak.


His play has been scummy bad. It's not just bad bad. Why jail Lanaia?

Do you believe the hatter claim?

Why bomb Protact after everything that happened day 2 and day 3 if he's actually town?

Why would he not jail several times?

Why has he contradicted himself? (sure, I guess he could just be bad)

Also, what the fuck happened to this?


On January 18 2012 10:50 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 10:43 wherebugsgo wrote:
Sheth makes a very good point that I almost forgot to mention earlier (I was going to ask him this)

OpZ, since you think BM is such an easy read, can you tell us what his alignment is?

Scum. Obviously.



I want to kill OpZ still. Reread his filter and look at the retardedness that spills forth:

On January 18 2012 10:24 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 10:09 jaj22 wrote:
@OpZ: Given that you think BM is easy to read, what do you reckon about his play so far?


For Foolishness maybe. I can't read BM like that. I like him, and used to PM him regularly. I've always said I'd cohost a game with him. He's prone to bouts of tyranny when he has power or a power role (see -TL maf 30, where he was Ninja [i don't know if its in thread, but it might be in the post game discussion, he threatened our town circle repeatedly because he wanted us to give up the other Ninja, whom was BC], and games he has hosted), so it makes his use of his sheriff power on Lanaia somewhat understandable. If Bill Murray has a power he will use it. As for his direction, and all that jazz? His posts are what he's thinking at any given time, and he distrusts atleast one of us masons. Other than that I haven't seen anything blatant from him.

What's your take on Protactinum?


bolded is important; contradicts the "easy read" part.


On January 18 2012 10:57 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 10:49 jaj22 wrote:
On January 18 2012 10:24 ~OpZ~ wrote:
What's your take on Protactinum?

I think he's been the best town player in the game, frankly. If Macpo and GGQ both flip green then I might start to worry, but fundamentally his play looks like good scumhunting to me, and there's not too much of that going on in this game.


And his contradictions of himself are just good town play too?
Claiming to of provided foundation to a day in which he really did next to nothing?


On January 21 2012 04:43 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2012 04:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:29 p4NDemik wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:02 p4NDemik wrote:
OK people here is where we make a stand. We have caught both of our elected roles acting very fishy today. BM is a clear lynch and you have all already moved forward on this point as shown by your votes.

BC's recent actions are now clearly contradictory and we need to do everything we can to garnish more information about his intentions ASAP. I am going to reemphasize that my case against supersoft is no less credible than that against kingjames. What now makes my case more valuable is the information is gives us on BC which is going to be absolutely vital moving forward into the next few days of this game.

I want to urge everyone to ##vote Bill Murray and v##vote supersoft this is an opportunity that can't be passed up. BM has practically dug his own grave and now BC finds himself in a major pickle.


How am I contradictary? Your case on SS is weak. I am calling glurio out yet I have not said "lets all off this player". If you notice I said the lynch on supersoft was not viable at this point based on the information provided. I have not said lynch glurio. How am I at all being contradictory?

As for your case against supersoft being as good as kingjames, I would strongly disagree. You did your initial analysis off 1 post while ignoring the rest. How is that stronger than a case against kingjames who has been analyzed by 3 players, and in one analysis he was shown to be misrepresenting himself on what he claimed to be doing, and was out and out doing dickall to help the town?


You have not made overt statements that blatantly contradict themselves but you are dealing with two players in incredibly similar situations. Both of these people claim to be masons. Both of them have questionable plays as masons. supersoft's grand contribution as a "town mason" is discussing the lynch of a townie (Palmar) with WBG and supposedly attempting to mason L to no avail. glurio comes out now after having not even used his day 1 mason (which was actually a better use than what supersoft did after all) and then he tried to mason you but you wouldn't respond (this isn't even his fault, and it is actually confirmable unlike supersoft's story). Both have not been actively playing with the town's interests in mind in the end though. Yet, you choose to disregard my case but jump on glurio out of the blue when there are plausible explanations for his behavior.

I analyzed one post I thought was his strongest tell. While I will agree this along isn't as compelling as a contrived multi-quote analysis, I did read through his filter and saw nothing to lead me away from my suspicions and next to nothing that looked like pro-town behavior. I fail to see how the number of players doing analysis weakens my personal work. I have not been campaigning like you, before today my thread presence wasn't something incredible. So I don't necessarily inspire mass support immediately. But I don't think that should be used against me. Again, I don't deny that Kingjames is suspicious at all, but honestly have you seen supersoft's defense posts? Have you seen them? They are a wet tissue. Not even good enough to withstand a sneeze. His reaction to scrutiny has been the polar opposite of Kingjames but just as damning in my opinion.

If you acknowledge the similarity between supersoft and glurio you CANNOT deny that a lynch of supersoft says a lot about your alignment. And this is something we as town need to be very sure of going forward. This is what makes this lynch better than kingjames and something that can't be ignored any longer.


Lynching kingjames gives a fuckton of information on my alignment as well. If he flips town im basically up shits creek without a paddle. Why would you go to lynch someone to gain information on me that is nowhere nearly as informative as lynching someone I have invested near most of the day into? I said supersofts lynch wasnt viable today, the case on him isn't extensive enough. I also provided you with a post of his that screams out town to me.

I have a complete red read on someone else, whos lynch would give far more information on me than any other candidate at this point, yet you want to lynch someone else for information on me? the fuck dude, seriously.

I've trusted you to be town, up until most recent posts BC. Please rethink before posting things like this, okay?

I masoned Kita, cuz he asked me too, but he just told me he'd be away til 4:30....

-__-...And I gotta go pick up my motorcycle from the shop and might wind up going to work cuz they called me in again. Depends when I can get my bike so I might still be MIA.


3 days pass between those two posts, and all OpZ does when he actually does post is attack high profile players.

He doesn't actually make cases on them, though, he just sheds doubt on them and undermines their credibility.

Finally, remember how I said I think mafia is trying to lock down the lynch on someone based on GGQ dying and flipping town?

Check it out, OpZ's only serious contribution to the thread. All game he has completely ignored Meapak, but suddenly he comes in guns blazing with this bullshit. Everytime, he apologizes for disappearing, but still doesn't do anything. I guess at this point he knows he has no choice but to actually do something, so he comes in and posts a massive analysis that no one will ever read:

On January 23 2012 16:35 ~OpZ~ wrote:
...Okay....Looking at meapak. He super tunnels GGQ, directs Hiro's wanting of lynching Sandroba, saying GGQ is a better target, called analysis on Sandroba comical, soft defends macp, then defends himself against Foolishness:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 14:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Foolishness I'm kinda dissapointed. Your case against me is based around meta. Yeah it's true, I've never tunneled anyone hardcore like I'm doing with GGQ right now, does that necessaily make me scum? You don't think GGQ is scum, however incog/protact agrees with me. So what am I doing then? By your logic I'm a hyperaggressive scum trying to mislynch a townie, thats nothing like my scum meta (feeling free to use this since you brought it up as part of your case).

If you use incog's logic, I'm scum bussing a teammate. But what's my next move? My red list largely agrees with both yours, if I suddenly back off any of them it'll be super obvious. If I'm scum then I'm locked into bussing my own team for the next several days (given that you, me, and incog all think macpo and opz are scum).

I will continue to campaign to get GGQ lynched, he is the best option for today. However, I'm not an idiot, if it comes down to macpo and protact or macpo and sandroba then of course I'll vote macpo.

Everyone should vote GGQ though.

I do not like this post.

Only votes Macpo because the "gods demand." I do not like sheep on my island. No sir.
Again he defends himself against foolishness by saying "My reads line up with yours!":
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 15:27 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
@Foolishness, you really didn't respond to my points, you just said "I use meta" and then fail to explain how my actions indicate I'm mafia. You failed to address either of the scenarios I put forth. Oh and your line about being hyper aggressive gives me something to do all game, you fail to factor in that I have been and will be hyper aggressive towards player you think are scum. You may not think that hyper aggression is good for the town (normally I would agree however at the moment I feel it's warranted, hence my behavior) however you can't argue that I'm pushing a scum agenda because my reads largely line up with yours.


In This Post:
Please Lead Me Masters!!!:
Note: He's pushing a confirmed town GGQ, over a confirmed mafia, Macpo, while at the same time saying "I feel GGQ is scummier." Now...Being a sheep isn't necessarily a mafia trait, but there was no way to not get Macpo lynched, so he might as well follow the "town leaders"
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 06:01 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Foolishness, Protact/Incog, or BC. Get in this thread and start pushing your chosen candidate or I'm going to go back and vote GGQ. I expected you guys to try and lead this thread, however if you're unwilling or unable then the thread will derp (as it is now). At least when I'm pushing someone the thread has direction, right now everyone and their grandma is screaming scum at someone else.

So get in here and start pushing macpo. You three apparently thought he was the best choice for today. I agree he's scummy but GGQ was better... so in interest of streamlining discussion I went with you guys. However none of you have shown any interest in keeping people on track so if none of you have gotten it together in two hours I'm going back and lynching GGQ.


Again, supports Sandroba.
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:06 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:15 Toadesstern wrote:
wtf, why are we even considering to kill GGQ. That guy hasn't posted at all.
Let the vigs deal with those people.
Macpo posted very little as well but I see that he is scummy. Still I'd say it's a job for our vigs.

I'd be up for lynching sandroba and if I have to I'd be also up for BM. He might very well flip red but imo it's too risky to lynch him that early.

Alright Toad I'm done with you, gonna give our lovely vigis something to shoot at tonight. Expect an analysis in 30-45 minutes.

Toad I thought you were scummy because you have terribad reads, however when I go back through your filter I don't get a scum feel from your posts. You're in the same category as WBG is right now, I don't think you're scum but your reads are atrocious (I do agree with L and to a lesser extent BM however, as I've stated a million times, GGQ is much more likely to flip scum than either of them).

Being bad doesn't make you scum, so while you're currently off the mark in many regards, you're not scum because of that. Oh I also looked at Sandroba (again), I still don't think he's scum.

Given macpo's latest post I'm going to stick with him as the lynch (it also looks like GGQ will be modkilled).



Attaches the lynch of Macpo to sandroba:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 12:07 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Awesome. All you idiots who tried to get sandroba or protact lynched have a lot of explaining to do.


OMG, IT WAS YOU?!?
-_-...Seriously Meapak, this was a terribad post, with WIFOM out the bunghole. I'm not even going to address anything in it, except my insulting of sheth: "Learn to build a case proper," or subtly insulting me, where Sheth was ignoring all facts, and the fact Sheth immediately OMGUS'd me day one. I had my reasons for suspecting Protact day one/day two, in that's as far as I'm concerned.
(Meapaks post on me, where he GREATLY exaggerates.)
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 20 2012 14:23 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
First off, sorry about the delay, second, Sheth is actually better at mafia then I would have given him credit for. Now to opz.

Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 06:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm still wondering the proper benefits to the mass mason claim. I'm neutral as again, the role seems rather bland for the town this game. Being a mason doesn't confirm you. I'd like to know the general town consensus.

So far I see Sandroba screaming for mass mason claim. Which I suppose all of the whisperers being public knowledge would be a good thing. But I don't wanna feel like sheep. I suppose theres no way around it though, or that its really important. I'm Mason #2. And I mason'd BC. But he won't talk to me. *cries*

This is a scum post. He’s neutral, everything about this post is neutral. Wishy washy and neutral are scum behaviors.

Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 08:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I like L's direction his post carries. They like all the extraneous drama that everyone elses had. He's also a notable scum hunter, and very successful at it. I think I'm leaving my vote for him on him actually.

Supports a flipped mafia for mayor.

Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 08:55 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 15 2012 08:44 Protactinium wrote:
On January 15 2012 08:37 rgTheSchworz wrote:
So confused at the moment. Have the feeling we're going nowhere, even worse, several of our blues have blundered.
I'm gonna vote BM, as Sandroba has the highest chance of being scum out of potential candidates.His posts have been weird enough, he runs for mayor then isnt particularly active or scum-hunting,some of his posts like the one with the eagle landing on his arm disturbed me.
I'll keep an eye on the following: Risk.nuke, Palmar.
I feel palmar still has a role to play. Don't lynch him day1, maybe day 2 if he continues like that.

The whole mason thing started by BC was useless in my opinion.50/50 chance of being mafia/town. Bollocks, they're maybe more town masons than mafia, maybe less. You can't know that, unless maybe.. you have external information.
Also, as sandro is suspicious and BC had made a sort of a deal with him, my feelings about this persona shall remain mixed at best.


When the town isn't going anywhere, look for mafia interference. I clearly have been trying to give some direction to this thread, so there isn't really the excuse that the town is just newb and doesn't know what to do.

Furthermore, this game isn't like some others where 2 mistaken townies pollute the thread by attacking each other on pretty thin grounds.

If you look at the thread as a whole, you probably will only be able to find 1 player who really sticks out of the discussion, and that's BC. If you agree that the town isn't going anywhere, the question should be why. BC has steered the course of the discussion for the most part of this day, despite only having around 5% of the total game posts. While I have no problem with someone having this few amount of posts, an examination of BC's posts shows that he has created more ? He creates a discussion which blows up disproportionately to its significance in the game.


In all seriousness, please it would be nice to know which of you is posting. At any rate, you have given what kind of direction with your 3 posts before this one where you claim to have been giving direction? You are representing yourself falsely. Something someone on the mafia team would do. You have also gotten a lot of support without posting damn near anything. I think your highly probable mafia.


Starts calling out and trying to discredit protact.
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 03:03 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 02:20 Jayjay54 wrote:
Hey guys, I’m back from work, so I have time to figure stuff out.

First of all, GG to all the dead. May they rest in peace! WP everyone.

I try to focus on the NKs, we may get information why they were shot. I’ll compare them by listing People they opposed and things they supported, mostly with quotes. May contain traces of WIFOM.

I want to start with the not so sure shot people. You'll see why.


Lanaia


On January 16 2012 14:10 Bill Murray wrote:
I am pretty sure I saved Lanaia from being killed last night


People she opposed:
Well, pretty much none (talking about before the day 2 start, she gave a pretty neutral list today). A little post against palmar, a little post about L, but quickly withdraw.

Things she supported:
Well, uhm. Yeah. Vote was on BC
Sooo Lanaia? What? Why? She was a total Null read to nearly everybody. Some people even called her scum. Includiiing:

On January 15 2012 21:52 Bill Murray wrote:
Lynch, Lynch, Lynch!:
Lanaia
Mafia


a) Why the fuck would BM jail Lanaia? Because he thought she has a role? Lanaia was even confused herself.

On January 16 2012 14:16 Lanaia wrote:
Bill, if that were the case, would I have been notified of being killed?
But yeah, I can confirm he did target me.
However, I have no idea why. May I ask why?

This makes 0 sense to me. Care to explain BM?

b) How does BM know that he saved her? Does he get notified? And why would he want that if he thinks shes scum? And why on earth would the mafia use a pretty NK to kill a pretty neutral person who even was a lynch candidate to some? Please enlighten us BM.

=> Don’t know what to make out of it. But I don’t believe whatsoever that the mafia used a NK on her. Which is why:


Could Lanaia be mafia? You ever consider that? I have...Not just the long post today were neutral. Almost every post. But I'll be pointing that out later, I gotta do some things real quick.


Up until this post he’s never mentioned Lanaia and look at how he does so, he calls her out for neutral posts… lol. He says he’ll point all the stuff out later… I’ll wait for later to see what he has to say.

Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 08:01 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 07:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
@schworz, there are currently three serious candidates being discussed, protact, sandroba, and GGQ. That's a fine number of candiates for me.

I want to lynch Lanaia. Every post is wishywashy, and that big post with probably 30 people on it was a huge attempt to appear to be doing something. Just doesn't feel right.


Well that’s his reason, he’s either not putting effort or he doesn’t believe his own case. It’s also ironic since he calls her out for the exact same thing he himself did. This just seems like an effort to split town votes more, especially since he never comes back to her.

Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 08:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 08:04 Toadesstern wrote:
On January 17 2012 08:01 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 07:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
@schworz, there are currently three serious candidates being discussed, protact, sandroba, and GGQ. That's a fine number of candiates for me.

I want to lynch Lanaia. Every post is wishywashy, and that big post with probably 30 people on it was a huge attempt to appear to be doing something. Just doesn't feel right.


she is that wishy washy as town. I don't think she's mafia at all unless she does that on purpose to look like her town play.
I'd say the first one is more likly.

I've never played with her, and regardless of it, I said I feel off. I'm trusting my gut on this one. She is mafia.

Protact is suspected strongly mafia to me and should be to everyone else, plus annoying as heck, example: They've been asked repeatedly, by multiple people, to post which one of them are posting. It's not hard or difficult to comply with that, and seems reasonable I believe. Also, THEY gained a random ass following, claimed to have had given Day one direction, when they had all of 4 posts when they claimed to have given direction to the day. Seriously. That's a load of horse manure. I don't trust protact, at all even if he pointed out ciryandor. He wasn't the first to call him out and even changed his target to BC afterwards. I won't sheep after his wishes.


More discrediting of protact. Here’s my feeling with people who call out protact, it’s fine, to be suspicious on day one when protact’s reads haven’t been shown to be correct, however at this point protact has been right about one mafia and a lot of people in the thread believe he’s on track to a second. Hindsight shows that protact is subsequently right about two more mafia and this begs the question, why is opz so certain protact is mafia? Unless you believe he was bussing, he’s already scored one kill, the worst you should be is mildly suspicious at this point. Also his reasoning is stupid. Basically it boils down to them not signing their posts and having a “random ass following.” News flash, it’s normal for people to listen to players who correctly call out scum.

Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 10:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Protactinum, Incognito/Mystlord, again, for the umpteenth time, many in the thread, myself, Lanaia, BC, and I'm sure others, have asked you to head your posts with the person posting.


More random calling out of protact simply because they don’t head their posts. This doesn’t make protact mafia lol.

Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 09:49 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 09:06 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
We have a few hours left till lynch and the majority is definitely on Macpo for now. I'm fine with this as I still think theres a good chance hes red .

At the start of the day remember that Meapak brought up that we want to keep the candidate pool small. He provided Sandroba / Protactinium / GGQ as our "primary targets". I then added Macpo to that list thanks to primarily my re-read and thoughts on Protactiniums post that Macpo is red .

As this day has went on, the two lurkers here GGQ + Macpo haven't posted much and this has led people to worry that perhaps they are just lynching a lurker and the lack of opposition to it makes them think that it will be a town flip. However I would like to point out that it would be practically impossible to "defend" macpo or GGQ based on their posts so far, so it makes sense that no one has went out in his defense solidly yet. I still believe our logic for lynching him is good and would like to get a red out of this lynch. If you haven't voted for a double lynch tomorrow please do.

On to someone else who I really feel is red. I feel like we have lots of good candidates from this post here :

+ Show Spoiler +
On January 17 2012 13:28 Foolishness wrote:
READ CAREFULLY! DON'T LOSE THIS POST! REPOST MANY TIMES

I am making this post as a way of compiling the thoughts of the few people in this game who are making sense and posting good analysis. A lot of it will be my own thoughts, but it's heavily based on a few people (should be obvious) who are the most transparent and the most obvious townies.

9 Mafia remaining. Here's the preliminary suspects: Macpo, GGQ, L. These are the people I feel we have the best case for and most of the transparent people in the thread seem to agree about these 3. Personally I think GGQ is town and we should avoid lynching him for now. Protact already gave viable reasons why Macpo is better than GGQ today, and I feel there is little to argue there. sandroba pointed out how L is acting like in Ver's game, and I couldn't agree more. We also have Incog's analysis against L.

Secondary suspects: Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees. These 3 people have garnered attention from a few people but not from everyone, so they are listed as secondary candidates. I am of the belief that all 3 of these people are mafia. evantrees is already mentioned by Incog. I think Cyber_Cheese highlighted a good summary of chaosquo here. Most of it is similar arguments to Macpo.

Bill Murray as red? I think so. Others have cast suspicion but there's not been a full analysis anywhere. A few people have commented that the election "feels" weird in some way, and I definitely sympathize. The votes for Bill Murray come across as the most suspicious: lots of random votes there. Personally I was surprised he even got into office (remember I was out all day so I saw the results without reading the previous 20 pages). I do realize I may have initially pushed him into candidacy, but I shall take responsibility for that and see to it that he's lynched in the near future. But to be simple: Bill Murray posted a lot, and got into office. Since then he's been pretty passive at the helm (so has BC I realize). That's good enough reason to warrant a ton of suspicion, as he should be actively scumhunting and posting without fear at this point.

Remaining mafia candidates: Jackal, Opz, kingjames, zeks. Incog has an analysis against Jackal as we know. I am not on board with him being mafia yet. Traditionally when he is mafia he posts paragraphs, and not one-liners. However he warrants suspicion for having an apathetic attitude.

Opz is someone who I believe Sheth was the first to cast doubt on, and I must say Sheth is definitely onto something. I know of the past Opz as a town player who is aggressive, not afraid to call people out on their bullshit. That's something we aren't seeing much of this game. He's posted a few of his own thoughts, but there is a clear lack of effort. Bored townie who is facepalming at having to read 100 pages? Possibly. Mafia hiding in the shadows? Fits better.

kingjames is called out on by Incog, and there's further analysis by BC. His last sentence is the perfect sum to kingjames: "The key thing to note is that in contrast to his town play where he is outgoing and analytical, his posts in this game are very subdued, seem artificial and feel overly planned." kingjames has yet to do anything to contradict this.

zeks I felt strongly about yesterday, he made a bad post which is nothing like his normal outspoken attitude (though it's been a while since he's played I think). He has since asked for a replacement and hasn't posted, but should still be looked at in the future.

Meapak_Ziphh is someone I would like to throw out there as a candidate (which shouldn't be a surprise from the few of my recent posts). What has Meapak done this game? Tried to get GGQ lynched, and unfortunately that's about all he's tried to do. There is a very aggressive push from him to kill this guy, which I find a little suspicious and slightly out of character.


Mafia: Macpo, GGQ, L, Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees, Opz, Kingjames, Meapak_Ziphh.

Substitute a few off candidates and I think we've found our 9: Jackal, BrownBear, zeks, Munk-E, other random inactive player goes here.

DONT LOSE THIS POST ITS SO IMPORTANT!

Writing all that I think the usefulness of this post is immediately made clear. The most prominent townies and the ones doing the analysis are all right on most of their reads. It's just each person has found 2-3 mafia on their own, and most of the time they are all different. Pooling this information together I realize it's hard to call anyone and their analysis wrong, as when you analyze the big picture everything fits together.

Anyone in their right mind would look at this game and think "wow this atmosphere is perfect for the mafia". Ver once told me that lots of times it's easier to find the mafia when the town atmosphere sucks because they will not be the ones causing chaos and disruption. Instead they will be sitting on the sidelines enjoying the show while the townies flail around. Look at all the names I've listed above. Everyone (yes everyone on that list) is guilty of apathy and does not have the interests of the town in mind. They are not thinking long term, or analyzing the big picture. They aren't playing the game, they are watching.

Macpo

Many others have said so, and though I may be biased, I still think it's best we lynch him today. I believe his case is still by far the strongest we have at the moment, especially since he has responded to his threats (with even more reason to kill him). At the time of writing GGQ has yet to say anything. We kill him (Macpo) today and spend the night figuring out who has the next best case. In the meantime, I'm going to be looking for connections between the above players to see if anyone can be ruled out or automatically included.

IF YOU HAVE FINISHED READING AND YOU ARE A COMPETENT TOWN PLAYER PLEASE READ AGAIN

Also, after sifting through this information, I feel we have a strong enough lead to start killing like there's no tomorrow.
##Vote: double lynch



I'd like to add my case against OpZ here as well.

His first post is as follows :

+ Show Spoiler +
On January 13 2012 15:29 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2012 15:17 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote:
On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote:
/confirm

LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot.

I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again.


I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign.

My campaign is to not make a campaign post, because they're all the same (except for foolishness' so far), and they're all useless.

Generic Mayoral Campagin

I think I am the best candidate to be voted into office, these are my credentials:
  • I am Town
  • I promise to be active
  • I always do bad as scum, so even if I'm scum you can catch me (Optional: Link or reference past games)
  • I promise to lynch someone scummy (Or a lurker, or another mayoral candidate, or Kavdragon)
  • I am the best townie who ever towned
  • I like kittens and ponies, and everything innocent and pure

VOTE FOR ME!!!!!

I think this adequately describes nearly every mayoral post we will see in this game.

So, Foolishness, why do you think that Bill Murray is easier to read than any other player in the game? What games has he played, where he's shown his worth as a townie? I've only played with him twice, and they weren't exactly demonstrative of awesome play, but I don't think he was trying that hard.

IIRC, Foolishness is one of the few people that actually....supports BM? Besides myself of course. And when you know BM...You just know BM...He's not that difficult of a read. (for Wiggs and Kita) I just think its rather funny Foolishness is pushing for someone else to be mayor, when he himself dies like almost every Day one. I would rather just vote for Foolishness to be completely honest, but Kitaman as of right now is who I'm thinking of. Past games I've played with him we was pretty damned good, and he's actually wanting the position.

Are you planning on be really active Foolishness?

Also, I probably need to go to fucking bed, 1:30EST and I work at 7...-_-



Right off the bat he wants to support BM because he is "easy to read" and has however posted no content on this matter afterwards. He then suggests that Kita and Wiggles can read him. (Kita + Wiggles were both shot at last night). Interesting so far...

His second post :

+ Show Spoiler +

The Mason this game is more just about whispering it looks like. It really isn't that strong in the game. They can't create circles or nothing. They can disseminate roles privately I suppose but the threat is always there that the mason is mafia. As you yourself might be BC. I don't really see too much power in the role as of the moment. Especially if you play the game as such as to ignore pms.


Starts off by saying that Mason is a weak roll. And that people should be worried the mason is mafia (after BC claimed). And then suggests ignoring PM's as an idea. Mason however isn't a weak roll at all.

Thirdly and weirdly :
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 14 2012 06:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm still wondering the proper benefits to the mass mason claim. I'm neutral as again, the role seems rather bland for the town this game. Being a mason doesn't confirm you. I'd like to know the general town consensus.

So far I see Sandroba screaming for mass mason claim. Which I suppose all of the whisperers being public knowledge would be a good thing. But I don't wanna feel like sheep. I suppose theres no way around it though, or that its really important. I'm Mason #2. And I mason'd BC. But he won't talk to me. *cries*


Doesn't know about mass mason claim suggests the roll is bland, which I can understand. Doesn't want to feel like sheep. However eventually says that he is Mason #2 and that BC won't talk to him. Nothing honestly too weird here.

4th Post :


+ Show Spoiler +

Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. Welcome back.


Wants to ignore PMS again. Its not highly logical at all, its actually the opposite. It removes all logic. However after this he says that hes still going to PM Bill. Really contradictory about the Mason roll.

He then flip flops entirely within 2 posts :

First he says

On January 14 2012 15:41 ~OpZ~ wrote:

As for Palmar, I'll admit I'm seeing a difference, but I've seen this same argument against Palmar a few times. Everyone seems to attack him if he doesn't do his usual posting for mayor or what not. I'd rather he contribute more than what he has. As of right now I find him a very viable lynch candidate.



Then :


I suppose anytime is a good time, just I don't think using a mayor lynch to lynch a power player like him is a smart move. Thats really what I meant by not a good time to go after him.

Claiming not to trust him is the truest thing I've ever said, and I say it every game. I don't like following people just because they say thats the best way. I'm not gonna be sheeped around.

And I just asked you about Protact because I was asking somebody elses opinion about it also. I just wanted some discussion on a player


So he at first suggests lynching Palmar then doesn't want to go after him because he is a "power player" if I'm correct in understanding this. Also HERE IS A HUGE MISTAKE. When he says that he just asked about Protact because "I just wanted some discussion on a player". Why would you say this? You don't want just discussion on a player. You want to find out what the player and the poster thinks in depth and why. You were so against Protact and then say this its horrible. You just want their opinion and discussion... you should want to know if they are Mafia or not.

Next post : Completely unhelpful to town players :

On January 14 2012 16:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:12 Scamp wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:08 Mattchew wrote:
foolishness would have stuck with only bill murray had I not mason'd him. Now he pushes for me and bill because to him I am safe.


With this post, you will not be getting my vote, unless you post something of substance really, really soon.

Could not of said it better myself. But now that he mentions it, where the hell is BM? I'm not sold that any of the mayor candidate have a proper direction right now, and for all declaring they'd be active, they seem to be lacking.



He is VERY sure Mattchew is blue :

On January 15 2012 07:23 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm changing my vote to mattchew for reasons that I find completely obvious. Everyone else should also.


However at this point there was no reason to think he was blue, at least no real reason any better then to think BC or even Opz is blue. All he had done was claim Mason. Its somewhat a good point for you that you wanted to vote for him, however at this point it was not completely obvious.

THEN EVEN THOUGH HE IS VERY SURE ABOUT MATTCHEW; He changes his vote to L!!!!

On January 15 2012 08:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I like L's direction his post carries. They like all the extraneous drama that everyone elses had. He's also a notable scum hunter, and very successful at it. I think I'm leaving my vote for him on him actually.



No reason for this!! Only reason would be because he knows Mattchew is blue, so he just wanted to post that he thought he wasn't guilty and then to possibly go on to someone that is mafia. (Good chance L is mafia if OpZ flips red or at least slightly better chance)

Going to post this now, because I don't want it to get too long. The rest of his posts are calling out Lanaia for being scum. When pressured why he thinks this by me he suggests that hes already posted the why. However he hadn't. He then posts the why which basically is "shes not posting much interesting information". Its not because she looks scummy or has acted scummy, its simply because shes not posting much to help town. Which may seem like a good reason, but I really feel its not that great. This is his complete evidence for why Lanaia is mafia :

+ Show Spoiler +
Oh, I'm sorry. Must I dredge up all the evidence of why I feel that way.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&currentpage=64#1267
"I really liked L up until he asked about the vig shot. However, he's redeemed himself since in my eyes. I like his posting style."

L even asked her, how did he redeem himself? Because he hadn't done shit since then.

Then she says "If three people hadn't just switched to WBG all at once, I would have voted him. It just feels kinda weird. I mean, I know it's not the end of the cycle and it won't push him into the win (iirc), but... " and just leaves it at that. Fine. Okay. The obvious reason is, despite claiming to want to, she's too concerned with looking suspicious to follow what she claims to want to do. Almost all of her posts consist of this as a premise. Being concerned about looking suspicious and voicing this concern. No real meat.
When asked to point out people she would lynch today? She picks two people I'd consider lurkers. Two people least likely to defend themselves.

Although the posts as of late, have been more town related, I'm still highly suspect, and would get behind a lynch.



So, if I do happen to die this night, I'd like this case to be top priority for tomorrow and I'm bringing it up early as I think he is red .

~OpZ~ the Mafia


most awful, and utter bull shit. Mattchew was modkilled for by the time I posted that, that which I had not known. WHY I WAS CERTAIN, was because of why he was modkilled. You could see his pms were only from Foolishness as opposed to if he was mafia, he would ALMOST CERTAINLY have atleast a pm from another person.
"Right off the bat he wants to support BM because he is "easy to read" and has however posted no content on this matter afterwards. He then suggests that Kita and Wiggles can read him. (Kita + Wiggles were both shot at last night). Interesting so far..."
What did you do? Just click my filter and read my posts out of context?

The portion was dedicated to Kita and Wiggles, FOR AS TO WHY I would say Foolishness would push BM as a candidate, not with regards to Kita and Wiggles reading BM. Has Wiggles even played a game with BM, (or am I confusing him with Meapak)?

Masons are terribly weak in this game in my opinion BESIDES in mafia hands. Sure, I can bounce ideas off one person in PM, OR I CAN BOUNCE THEM OFF THE ENTIRE THREAD. I believe this is something me and BC were in agreement about.

Then you point out me asking you about protact?!

Holy fucking shit son. I haven't been the harbinger of Protact is mafia or anything this game. Oh no. I asked Scamp, WHO HAS BEEN MIGHTY QUIET, about Protact changing from Ciryandor to wanting to lynch BC, WHO I HAD the strongest town read on. Get this trash out of my face you protact following scum. I've done pointed out you buddying him once.

The portion about voting L instead of Mattchew, because I knew he was blue? MATTCHEW WAS DEAD, by the point. Jesus fucking christ. Learn to build a case proper.

You mad cuz I pointed you out for buddying your scum buddy protact?

So lets note, everything you have as a case against me is:
A) wrong
B) out of context
C) a lie

While me pointing you out for voting for protact for no reason still stands, with the amazing defense of, "You didn't point anyone else out for voting for protact!!"
On January 14 2012 07:23 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
On January 14 2012 07:10 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 14 2012 07:01 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
On January 14 2012 06:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Sheth....For real? That is your reason for voting for someones who already stated that their activity will be waning? Would all it take to get you to change to BC or Sandroba be a declaration of lynching Ciry or is it just because he has already chosen his lynch target?

Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. Welcome back.



They haven't stated their activity will be waning. No just switching to lynching Cir wouldn't cause me to switch my vote.


That was stated prior to the game start. I'm just curious as to your reasons for voting for them and the only reason I find is he is willing to lynch ciry. You didn't really say as to why and I found that scummy, so I guess it begs the question, why are you voting for protact?



You find a small point of my post, and call it scummy. You haven't complained about anyone else's votes and yet you consider that scummy. I wasn't even the first person to put my vote on him, but once its possibly gaining steam you point out that what I'm doing is scummy. You've also claimed to be our second Mason for those who missed it, as I didn't realize it until I read your filter.


In this post: He makes no mention of his reason for voting Protactinum, blatantly ignoring my question.


So I wanna take all these posts together as one. This is why I brought up sheth earlier. This is his big case, this is his was his push when he was alive. Analyzing and calling out opz. He actually doesn’t have half bad of a case, I won’t rehash it, it’s all in the spoilers. However it’s not Sheth’s case that is the big deal here, it’s opz’s reaction. All the neutrality and careful posting have flown away in the sudden face of raw fear of being lynched. It’s actually very strange how agitated and aggressive opz becomes when sheth calls him out. He pulls out the bold, all caps, and swear words, going waaaay over board. If you’re innocent, you know it and you can approach someone’s claims with rational thought because deep down you KNOW you’re town. Scum don’t have that luxury, when they get called out they have nowhere to run because they know the accusations are correct. I know this fear, I felt it in PYP:I, it makes you wanna either lurk or just go balls to the walls berserk on the person who called you out because there’s nothing you can do to stop them from being right. Opz’s change of tone in this post is hugely scummy before we even get to it’s content. But that said, let’s take a peek at the content. His first part about mattchew is incoherent at best, it seems like he’s saying he’s voting for mattchew because he flipped when he was modkilled :/. He emphasizes the weakness of masons, which is funny considering that he’s supposed to be a mason. He claims he hasn’t been the harbinger of mafia against protact which is pretty funny considering when you read his filter (as he suggests you do), there are certainly a lot of posts dedicated to protact. He ends his defense with some fairly nasty attacks of sheth for no reason, personally insulting him and then OMGUSing as well. Quite frankly I find this post to be worthy of a lynch in of itself, there is nothing townie about this defense, instead it’s about opz screaming “you’re wrong and you’re bad” in all caps and in bold. When this is added to his earlier behavior the case becomes more solid, and that isn’t even the icing on the cake. Guess who died last night? The one and only Liquid’Sheth. Why did sheth, a relatively new player and someone who hasn’t proved themselves as a stone cold scum killer warrant a hit? A look through his filter provides the answer. His life was almost completely dedicated to lynching GGQ. Sheth has done this before. In responsibility he correctly nailed the final scum and was then shot at night.

So I ask to consider all of this. Opz’s posts before being called out by sheth, his terrible post defending himself, and sheth’s subsequent death. Opz is mafia.

@BC since you apparently harbor suspcions of me please post them so we can deal with it.

My first vote will stay on GGQ, I'll decide my second by tomorrow afternoon.



Show nested quote +
On January 20 2012 15:04 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 20 2012 14:47 Nisani201 wrote:
On January 20 2012 14:40 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 20 2012 14:29 Nisani201 wrote:
Meapak, your case against Opz is not very good. You are basically calling him scum for being wrong (about Protact), while throwing in some mafia kill WIFOM.

I guess you didn't read it then lol. If you had you'd know those are two supporting tenets not the main idea.

OK then fine, you're calling him out for being consistent and pressuring against Protact...

Chainsaw much?

LOL wow you still didn't read it (or you fail at reading comprehension). He pressures protact when it's fairly obvious protact was town (scummy) and then when sheth calls him out on it he completely backtracks and claims he wasn't a big force against protact (ridiculous contradiction which looks extremely scummy).

Please, if you're going to comment at least understand what's going on.

Meapak, Please follow your own advice.

Excuse me? I claim I wasn't a big force against protract, I called myself the Harbinger of Protract is Mafia....I think that's like me calling myself the guy screaming "HE IS MAFIA" or did you miss that?...Oh I get it, Sarcasm didn't translate well...I thought the "Oh No" gave it away. Or the extra examples of me asking other players about him. Or everyone else that understood it was sarcastic. My bad he was fucking DT, but he was UNCOOPERATIVE, bothersome, and unwilling to agree. Not to mention his immediate following *note*before ever having popped a single mafia, and his claiming to provide direction in the thread when in reality, he hadn't done anything at that point. Sorry- I don't sheep.

Followed by two more posts of defending/soft defending sandroba....See the theme here guys?

I think I'm done here.

Meapak is Scum.



On January 18 2012 07:42 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:34 wherebugsgo wrote:
what does everyone think of hiro?

I'm rather curious.

He's tunnelled against Sandroba. Bases much of his argument on meta, which I don't attach much note to. He subbed in so not much to go on yet. His case against sandroba might be pretty legit rereading his post, but I've also noticed he provided no contrast to how Sandroba plays as town so he isn't showing a difference. Very one sided argument someone on the mafia team would use. But I'm going with a null read as of the moment.


Undermining credibility, but then more importantly:

NOTE THE WORDAGE

either the case is bullshit or the case is legit. OpZ straddles the line and he's all like "oh yeah hiro is tunneling sandro and he has no case since it's all meta...and he hasn't done the proper meta comparisons...but then again his case might have merit" He calls the case one-sided, something mafia would do, but then why the fuck would he say the case might have merit?

On January 18 2012 07:29 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:26 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:45 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 05:24 wherebugsgo wrote:
Now I remember why I hate large games...

Holy shit this town has no direction.

Must kill:

Bill Murray
Lanaia
Toadesstern
Meapak
Scamp
Bumatlarge

Should probably kill:

Jackal
Sandro
L
Protactinium

Bill Murray should die today. The case on macpo is weak to me but he's receiving a ton of suspicion so he might as well flip so we don't waste more time on him.

Once these players are dead there's probably half the mafia team hiding among noob lurkers.



You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?


I voted who I wanted to lynch. I've posted my reasons. Read my posts instead of blindly calling me scum. It makes you look scummy. Scum.


I have read your posts. You had a scum read on Lanaia and on BM as well. You reprimanded foolishness for suspecting you. However, I don't recall you putting your vote in this thread.

I'm on my phone right now, so I'm too lazy to change threads and try to hunt through pages to find your vote. I also donMt particularly care, for reasons that should slowly become apparent to people who are reading this right now.


You ignored my issues with protactinum. Which I'm starting to get fed up with tbh.

Again. I'm going to say it. He claimed to have provided the thread with direction with only having four posts, two of which were EXTREMELY unsubstantial, changed his lynch target (if elected) from someone now confirmed as mafia, to BC, who I view with my strongest town read. Not to mention all the random early votes he received with absolutely no reasoning. But hey, who cares what I say.


Nah, just forgot. You like jumping to conclusions, don't you?

Now I think here's where I jump to the conclusion that you ignored how I hated on Protac too. Oh but wait, that's your job, not mine. Sorry, I'm bad at this roleplaying shit.




Yet my vote rests on protact and yours doesn't. I'm supporting my case with what action the only action I can.


It was on Protact. I'd rather vote someone who actually has a chance of being lynched today. So far there is no indication that a Protactinium lynch will succeed.


And this passive attitude is what sheep are made of.

called me a sheep here despite the fact that I wasn't actually sheeping.

This kind of confused me when he first did it, because it made me realize how much OpZ wasn't actually reading the thread.

I brushed it off at first because I thought there were better targets at the time, but now it's reminding me that OpZ hasn't had town interests in mind (no reading lul)


On January 18 2012 07:15 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 06:47 hiro protagonist wrote:
I care about what you say ~OpZ~ <3

what do you think of sandro?

You care what I say, but don't say if you agree with it or not?
I feel like I'm just questioning sheth about why he voted for protag again. Another four posts just to get a response on what I've said.

Half the people in this thread can't seem to get Sandro's story straight, or are confused he claimed mason. I've facepalmed repeatedly about this, but maybe it's because I've actually read BC's posts. So I haven't given him much thought. Care to give me some time to look at him so I can give a better opinion? So far all my notes say are that he shouldn't post while drunk. And this one interesting note when I was reading him and BC's chatlogs, he was actually pressing Ciryandor. So I'm going with he's more likely town than protactinum.



defended sandro, but says "I haven't given him much thought," probably to absolve himself of responsibility if and when sandro flips scum.

Every single post that includes sandro or someone else scummy there's some bullshit excuse in there about how he hasn't paid attention to them or whatever. It's extremely suspicious because if those people flip scum (which he should know if he actually is scum) he can slither away from having to talk about them.

OpZ seemed to have difficulty talking about sandro repeatedly despite being asked over and over what he thought about him.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 07:58 GMT
#3728
you know what, fuck it, I have a better read on OpZ than BM anyway. I'm going to unvote BM because this case needs attention.

Everyone look at OpZ and please tell me in what world he is town. yes, there's that post where he points out I am suspicious of him and didn't include him on the "die now" list, but that's so minor in retrospect and it's just got WIFOM painted all over it. It's something he could do as both alignments (it's something I would do as scum for sure)

##unvote Bill Murray

##vote ~OpZ~
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 08:44 GMT
#3729
also LOL Dyrus is trolling an SC2 mafia game right now

http://clgaming.net/live/1151-dyrus
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 09:43 GMT
#3733
On January 23 2012 17:56 Bill Murray wrote:
BC + OpZ both look bad for the d1 action with sandroba
I'm completely fine lynching there, he's on my scumlist

I'm going to retract my mad hatter claim. I should have already done it, but I don't want to go out as a liar, even if I have lied this game, so I want to come clean.

I only did it because to me, I was protecting a pro-town power role.
I have 2 jailkeeps left that I can use to lower mafia KP
Mafia wanted the 3 votes, they didn't want a crummy jailkeeper ability when they have a jack, mason, framer, and roleblocker
Mafia wanted the Politician. They wanted the Floridian. Do you guys want a recount?
I don't.


what the fuck

of course you were lying -_-
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 09:45 GMT
#3734
On January 23 2012 18:09 ~OpZ~ wrote:
...My post in relation to sandroba that your using to incriminate me WBG is on the 18th. Meapaks extend from before that up until Sandroba gets lynched. Meapak ALSO attaches the lynching of Macpo to a combined effort of Sandroba and Protactinum. Also, you were sheeping. How much I wasn't reading the thread? Empty words are empty words. Glad to see you actually voted with someone you built a case on.

Also, about that defending sandroba? Did you even read that last post I quoted? Like seriously bo, go reread that. I hadnt given him much thought by that point because he really hadn't said shit, but I did read that chat logs, and the only telling thing about him was that he was pressing Ciry (who was confirmed dead mafia by that point) onto BC.


clearly you were not reading the thread, since my vote was not with the majority.

That's sheeping, you called me out on sheeping when it was obvious I was not. I even pointed that out to you and you never acknowledged it. I can't even tell if you're just being sarcastic and trolling me now, since I did vote someone I made a case on, and it wasn't blindly sheeping someone else.

You might not have been sheeping but you certainly haven't been particularly useful to town either.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 12:02 GMT
#3743
On January 23 2012 20:55 Bill Murray wrote:
I'm a doctor
I haven't used a jailkeep the last 2 nights because I have been truly protecting Foolishness
say goodbye to your protection folks
I wouldnt normally ever claim doctor, but I feel like Im really going to be lynched
adios


you are honestly the worst player I have ever played with.

congrats.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 19:23 GMT
#3830
cwave, why the hell would you care who the bodyguards are?

This question has been nagging at me for several minutes after I read your posts.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 23 2012 19:48 GMT
#3838
On January 24 2012 04:40 bumatlarge wrote:
If someone starts doing crazy shit in thread with no real explanation as soon as they are about to be lynched, it probably means they are scum.


why have you been so quiet all game, bum?

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 02:39 GMT
#3974
On January 24 2012 07:53 VisceraEyes wrote:
Everyone is spamming my Hiro lynch away. Woe is me.

VisceraEyes is sad-face panda.


More like you're spamming the thread away with complete and utter shit.

Why don't you come up with cases on the players you keep pushing instead of simply repeating yourself 20 times and contributing nothing to the thread but utter chaos?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 02:42 GMT
#3978
On January 24 2012 05:08 risk.nuke wrote:
wbg, are you suspicious of me?


right now? Not really, I want to kill OpZ.

the thing that's bothering me about the BM lynch is that, if he were scum and BC town, we would've likely seen BC dead by now (I feel). I feel like they would've just shot through the bodyguards and been like trolololol we got your mayor and your sheriff trololololol

ofc, that didn't happen; the bodyguards haven't flipped and it leaves me in a state of wtf is going on
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 02:46 GMT
#3981
On January 24 2012 11:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 11:39 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 07:53 VisceraEyes wrote:
Everyone is spamming my Hiro lynch away. Woe is me.

VisceraEyes is sad-face panda.


More like you're spamming the thread away with complete and utter shit.

Why don't you come up with cases on the players you keep pushing instead of simply repeating yourself 20 times and contributing nothing to the thread but utter chaos?


SILENCE SCUM!


your only saving grace is that I feel like you may be right about hiro.

However, you're still retarded.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 02:53 GMT
#3985
On January 24 2012 11:48 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 11:46 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 11:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 24 2012 11:39 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 07:53 VisceraEyes wrote:
Everyone is spamming my Hiro lynch away. Woe is me.

VisceraEyes is sad-face panda.


More like you're spamming the thread away with complete and utter shit.

Why don't you come up with cases on the players you keep pushing instead of simply repeating yourself 20 times and contributing nothing to the thread but utter chaos?


SILENCE SCUM!


your only saving grace is that I feel like you may be right about hiro.

However, you're still retarded.


That's cute, scum thinks I'm retarded when I call him scum. Awwwwwww!

No, I'm right about hiro. Prove that I'm wrong about you by doing something...ANYTHING that could be considered pro-town. Generally you're so into finding scum. Where's that fire this game? I'm not seeing it, and you calling me retarded just isn't doin it for me. So yeah, please find scum or shut up and die.


Apparently I have to repeat myself like you in order to "look town."


On January 23 2012 16:56 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2012 16:36 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 23 2012 16:30 wherebugsgo wrote:
I agree that glurio looks really bad.

However, BM dies today. There is no question about it, he dies today because his play has been wtf bad and he hasn't jailed people. Like, not jailing people when we elected you to do that, and the one time he jails it's a terrible jail.

And also he blackmails all of town into not lynching him by claiming mad hatter and saying the bomb is on Protact. Seriously?

At this point it is still possible he is town, but for someone to have played this anti-town all game, I don't care how retarded town you might be, you need to die. It's detrimental for us to leave him alive because he'll consume all our discussion time from here on out. People will keep coming back to him because his play has just created the atmosphere of "ok wtf do we do with this guy?"

Lynching him just because his play has been wtf bad is bad. Lynching mafia for being mafia is good. Lynch Meapak.


His play has been scummy bad. It's not just bad bad. Why jail Lanaia?

Do you believe the hatter claim?

Why bomb Protact after everything that happened day 2 and day 3 if he's actually town?

Why would he not jail several times?

Why has he contradicted himself? (sure, I guess he could just be bad)

Also, what the fuck happened to this?


Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 10:50 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 10:43 wherebugsgo wrote:
Sheth makes a very good point that I almost forgot to mention earlier (I was going to ask him this)

OpZ, since you think BM is such an easy read, can you tell us what his alignment is?

Scum. Obviously.



I want to kill OpZ still. Reread his filter and look at the retardedness that spills forth:

Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 10:24 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 10:09 jaj22 wrote:
@OpZ: Given that you think BM is easy to read, what do you reckon about his play so far?


For Foolishness maybe. I can't read BM like that. I like him, and used to PM him regularly. I've always said I'd cohost a game with him. He's prone to bouts of tyranny when he has power or a power role (see -TL maf 30, where he was Ninja [i don't know if its in thread, but it might be in the post game discussion, he threatened our town circle repeatedly because he wanted us to give up the other Ninja, whom was BC], and games he has hosted), so it makes his use of his sheriff power on Lanaia somewhat understandable. If Bill Murray has a power he will use it. As for his direction, and all that jazz? His posts are what he's thinking at any given time, and he distrusts atleast one of us masons. Other than that I haven't seen anything blatant from him.

What's your take on Protactinum?


bolded is important; contradicts the "easy read" part.


Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 10:57 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 10:49 jaj22 wrote:
On January 18 2012 10:24 ~OpZ~ wrote:
What's your take on Protactinum?

I think he's been the best town player in the game, frankly. If Macpo and GGQ both flip green then I might start to worry, but fundamentally his play looks like good scumhunting to me, and there's not too much of that going on in this game.


And his contradictions of himself are just good town play too?
Claiming to of provided foundation to a day in which he really did next to nothing?


Show nested quote +
On January 21 2012 04:43 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:29 p4NDemik wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On January 21 2012 04:02 p4NDemik wrote:
OK people here is where we make a stand. We have caught both of our elected roles acting very fishy today. BM is a clear lynch and you have all already moved forward on this point as shown by your votes.

BC's recent actions are now clearly contradictory and we need to do everything we can to garnish more information about his intentions ASAP. I am going to reemphasize that my case against supersoft is no less credible than that against kingjames. What now makes my case more valuable is the information is gives us on BC which is going to be absolutely vital moving forward into the next few days of this game.

I want to urge everyone to ##vote Bill Murray and v##vote supersoft this is an opportunity that can't be passed up. BM has practically dug his own grave and now BC finds himself in a major pickle.


How am I contradictary? Your case on SS is weak. I am calling glurio out yet I have not said "lets all off this player". If you notice I said the lynch on supersoft was not viable at this point based on the information provided. I have not said lynch glurio. How am I at all being contradictory?

As for your case against supersoft being as good as kingjames, I would strongly disagree. You did your initial analysis off 1 post while ignoring the rest. How is that stronger than a case against kingjames who has been analyzed by 3 players, and in one analysis he was shown to be misrepresenting himself on what he claimed to be doing, and was out and out doing dickall to help the town?


You have not made overt statements that blatantly contradict themselves but you are dealing with two players in incredibly similar situations. Both of these people claim to be masons. Both of them have questionable plays as masons. supersoft's grand contribution as a "town mason" is discussing the lynch of a townie (Palmar) with WBG and supposedly attempting to mason L to no avail. glurio comes out now after having not even used his day 1 mason (which was actually a better use than what supersoft did after all) and then he tried to mason you but you wouldn't respond (this isn't even his fault, and it is actually confirmable unlike supersoft's story). Both have not been actively playing with the town's interests in mind in the end though. Yet, you choose to disregard my case but jump on glurio out of the blue when there are plausible explanations for his behavior.

I analyzed one post I thought was his strongest tell. While I will agree this along isn't as compelling as a contrived multi-quote analysis, I did read through his filter and saw nothing to lead me away from my suspicions and next to nothing that looked like pro-town behavior. I fail to see how the number of players doing analysis weakens my personal work. I have not been campaigning like you, before today my thread presence wasn't something incredible. So I don't necessarily inspire mass support immediately. But I don't think that should be used against me. Again, I don't deny that Kingjames is suspicious at all, but honestly have you seen supersoft's defense posts? Have you seen them? They are a wet tissue. Not even good enough to withstand a sneeze. His reaction to scrutiny has been the polar opposite of Kingjames but just as damning in my opinion.

If you acknowledge the similarity between supersoft and glurio you CANNOT deny that a lynch of supersoft says a lot about your alignment. And this is something we as town need to be very sure of going forward. This is what makes this lynch better than kingjames and something that can't be ignored any longer.


Lynching kingjames gives a fuckton of information on my alignment as well. If he flips town im basically up shits creek without a paddle. Why would you go to lynch someone to gain information on me that is nowhere nearly as informative as lynching someone I have invested near most of the day into? I said supersofts lynch wasnt viable today, the case on him isn't extensive enough. I also provided you with a post of his that screams out town to me.

I have a complete red read on someone else, whos lynch would give far more information on me than any other candidate at this point, yet you want to lynch someone else for information on me? the fuck dude, seriously.

I've trusted you to be town, up until most recent posts BC. Please rethink before posting things like this, okay?

I masoned Kita, cuz he asked me too, but he just told me he'd be away til 4:30....

-__-...And I gotta go pick up my motorcycle from the shop and might wind up going to work cuz they called me in again. Depends when I can get my bike so I might still be MIA.


3 days pass between those two posts, and all OpZ does when he actually does post is attack high profile players.

He doesn't actually make cases on them, though, he just sheds doubt on them and undermines their credibility.

Finally, remember how I said I think mafia is trying to lock down the lynch on someone based on GGQ dying and flipping town?

Check it out, OpZ's only serious contribution to the thread. All game he has completely ignored Meapak, but suddenly he comes in guns blazing with this bullshit. Everytime, he apologizes for disappearing, but still doesn't do anything. I guess at this point he knows he has no choice but to actually do something, so he comes in and posts a massive analysis that no one will ever read:

Show nested quote +
On January 23 2012 16:35 ~OpZ~ wrote:
...Okay....Looking at meapak. He super tunnels GGQ, directs Hiro's wanting of lynching Sandroba, saying GGQ is a better target, called analysis on Sandroba comical, soft defends macp, then defends himself against Foolishness:
On January 17 2012 14:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Foolishness I'm kinda dissapointed. Your case against me is based around meta. Yeah it's true, I've never tunneled anyone hardcore like I'm doing with GGQ right now, does that necessaily make me scum? You don't think GGQ is scum, however incog/protact agrees with me. So what am I doing then? By your logic I'm a hyperaggressive scum trying to mislynch a townie, thats nothing like my scum meta (feeling free to use this since you brought it up as part of your case).

If you use incog's logic, I'm scum bussing a teammate. But what's my next move? My red list largely agrees with both yours, if I suddenly back off any of them it'll be super obvious. If I'm scum then I'm locked into bussing my own team for the next several days (given that you, me, and incog all think macpo and opz are scum).

I will continue to campaign to get GGQ lynched, he is the best option for today. However, I'm not an idiot, if it comes down to macpo and protact or macpo and sandroba then of course I'll vote macpo.

Everyone should vote GGQ though.

I do not like this post.

Only votes Macpo because the "gods demand." I do not like sheep on my island. No sir.
Again he defends himself against foolishness by saying "My reads line up with yours!":
On January 17 2012 15:27 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
@Foolishness, you really didn't respond to my points, you just said "I use meta" and then fail to explain how my actions indicate I'm mafia. You failed to address either of the scenarios I put forth. Oh and your line about being hyper aggressive gives me something to do all game, you fail to factor in that I have been and will be hyper aggressive towards player you think are scum. You may not think that hyper aggression is good for the town (normally I would agree however at the moment I feel it's warranted, hence my behavior) however you can't argue that I'm pushing a scum agenda because my reads largely line up with yours.


In This Post:
Please Lead Me Masters!!!:
Note: He's pushing a confirmed town GGQ, over a confirmed mafia, Macpo, while at the same time saying "I feel GGQ is scummier." Now...Being a sheep isn't necessarily a mafia trait, but there was no way to not get Macpo lynched, so he might as well follow the "town leaders"
On January 18 2012 06:01 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Foolishness, Protact/Incog, or BC. Get in this thread and start pushing your chosen candidate or I'm going to go back and vote GGQ. I expected you guys to try and lead this thread, however if you're unwilling or unable then the thread will derp (as it is now). At least when I'm pushing someone the thread has direction, right now everyone and their grandma is screaming scum at someone else.

So get in here and start pushing macpo. You three apparently thought he was the best choice for today. I agree he's scummy but GGQ was better... so in interest of streamlining discussion I went with you guys. However none of you have shown any interest in keeping people on track so if none of you have gotten it together in two hours I'm going back and lynching GGQ.


Again, supports Sandroba.
On January 18 2012 07:06 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:15 Toadesstern wrote:
wtf, why are we even considering to kill GGQ. That guy hasn't posted at all.
Let the vigs deal with those people.
Macpo posted very little as well but I see that he is scummy. Still I'd say it's a job for our vigs.

I'd be up for lynching sandroba and if I have to I'd be also up for BM. He might very well flip red but imo it's too risky to lynch him that early.

Alright Toad I'm done with you, gonna give our lovely vigis something to shoot at tonight. Expect an analysis in 30-45 minutes.

Toad I thought you were scummy because you have terribad reads, however when I go back through your filter I don't get a scum feel from your posts. You're in the same category as WBG is right now, I don't think you're scum but your reads are atrocious (I do agree with L and to a lesser extent BM however, as I've stated a million times, GGQ is much more likely to flip scum than either of them).

Being bad doesn't make you scum, so while you're currently off the mark in many regards, you're not scum because of that. Oh I also looked at Sandroba (again), I still don't think he's scum.

Given macpo's latest post I'm going to stick with him as the lynch (it also looks like GGQ will be modkilled).



Attaches the lynch of Macpo to sandroba:
On January 18 2012 12:07 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Awesome. All you idiots who tried to get sandroba or protact lynched have a lot of explaining to do.


OMG, IT WAS YOU?!?
-_-...Seriously Meapak, this was a terribad post, with WIFOM out the bunghole. I'm not even going to address anything in it, except my insulting of sheth: "Learn to build a case proper," or subtly insulting me, where Sheth was ignoring all facts, and the fact Sheth immediately OMGUS'd me day one. I had my reasons for suspecting Protact day one/day two, in that's as far as I'm concerned.
(Meapaks post on me, where he GREATLY exaggerates.)
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 20 2012 14:23 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
First off, sorry about the delay, second, Sheth is actually better at mafia then I would have given him credit for. Now to opz.

Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 06:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm still wondering the proper benefits to the mass mason claim. I'm neutral as again, the role seems rather bland for the town this game. Being a mason doesn't confirm you. I'd like to know the general town consensus.

So far I see Sandroba screaming for mass mason claim. Which I suppose all of the whisperers being public knowledge would be a good thing. But I don't wanna feel like sheep. I suppose theres no way around it though, or that its really important. I'm Mason #2. And I mason'd BC. But he won't talk to me. *cries*

This is a scum post. He’s neutral, everything about this post is neutral. Wishy washy and neutral are scum behaviors.

Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 08:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I like L's direction his post carries. They like all the extraneous drama that everyone elses had. He's also a notable scum hunter, and very successful at it. I think I'm leaving my vote for him on him actually.

Supports a flipped mafia for mayor.

Show nested quote +
On January 15 2012 08:55 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 15 2012 08:44 Protactinium wrote:
On January 15 2012 08:37 rgTheSchworz wrote:
So confused at the moment. Have the feeling we're going nowhere, even worse, several of our blues have blundered.
I'm gonna vote BM, as Sandroba has the highest chance of being scum out of potential candidates.His posts have been weird enough, he runs for mayor then isnt particularly active or scum-hunting,some of his posts like the one with the eagle landing on his arm disturbed me.
I'll keep an eye on the following: Risk.nuke, Palmar.
I feel palmar still has a role to play. Don't lynch him day1, maybe day 2 if he continues like that.

The whole mason thing started by BC was useless in my opinion.50/50 chance of being mafia/town. Bollocks, they're maybe more town masons than mafia, maybe less. You can't know that, unless maybe.. you have external information.
Also, as sandro is suspicious and BC had made a sort of a deal with him, my feelings about this persona shall remain mixed at best.


When the town isn't going anywhere, look for mafia interference. I clearly have been trying to give some direction to this thread, so there isn't really the excuse that the town is just newb and doesn't know what to do.

Furthermore, this game isn't like some others where 2 mistaken townies pollute the thread by attacking each other on pretty thin grounds.

If you look at the thread as a whole, you probably will only be able to find 1 player who really sticks out of the discussion, and that's BC. If you agree that the town isn't going anywhere, the question should be why. BC has steered the course of the discussion for the most part of this day, despite only having around 5% of the total game posts. While I have no problem with someone having this few amount of posts, an examination of BC's posts shows that he has created more ? He creates a discussion which blows up disproportionately to its significance in the game.


In all seriousness, please it would be nice to know which of you is posting. At any rate, you have given what kind of direction with your 3 posts before this one where you claim to have been giving direction? You are representing yourself falsely. Something someone on the mafia team would do. You have also gotten a lot of support without posting damn near anything. I think your highly probable mafia.


Starts calling out and trying to discredit protact.
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 03:03 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 02:20 Jayjay54 wrote:
Hey guys, I’m back from work, so I have time to figure stuff out.

First of all, GG to all the dead. May they rest in peace! WP everyone.

I try to focus on the NKs, we may get information why they were shot. I’ll compare them by listing People they opposed and things they supported, mostly with quotes. May contain traces of WIFOM.

I want to start with the not so sure shot people. You'll see why.


Lanaia


On January 16 2012 14:10 Bill Murray wrote:
I am pretty sure I saved Lanaia from being killed last night


People she opposed:
Well, pretty much none (talking about before the day 2 start, she gave a pretty neutral list today). A little post against palmar, a little post about L, but quickly withdraw.

Things she supported:
Well, uhm. Yeah. Vote was on BC
Sooo Lanaia? What? Why? She was a total Null read to nearly everybody. Some people even called her scum. Includiiing:

On January 15 2012 21:52 Bill Murray wrote:
Lynch, Lynch, Lynch!:
Lanaia
Mafia


a) Why the fuck would BM jail Lanaia? Because he thought she has a role? Lanaia was even confused herself.

On January 16 2012 14:16 Lanaia wrote:
Bill, if that were the case, would I have been notified of being killed?
But yeah, I can confirm he did target me.
However, I have no idea why. May I ask why?

This makes 0 sense to me. Care to explain BM?

b) How does BM know that he saved her? Does he get notified? And why would he want that if he thinks shes scum? And why on earth would the mafia use a pretty NK to kill a pretty neutral person who even was a lynch candidate to some? Please enlighten us BM.

=> Don’t know what to make out of it. But I don’t believe whatsoever that the mafia used a NK on her. Which is why:


Could Lanaia be mafia? You ever consider that? I have...Not just the long post today were neutral. Almost every post. But I'll be pointing that out later, I gotta do some things real quick.


Up until this post he’s never mentioned Lanaia and look at how he does so, he calls her out for neutral posts… lol. He says he’ll point all the stuff out later… I’ll wait for later to see what he has to say.

Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 08:01 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 07:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
@schworz, there are currently three serious candidates being discussed, protact, sandroba, and GGQ. That's a fine number of candiates for me.

I want to lynch Lanaia. Every post is wishywashy, and that big post with probably 30 people on it was a huge attempt to appear to be doing something. Just doesn't feel right.


Well that’s his reason, he’s either not putting effort or he doesn’t believe his own case. It’s also ironic since he calls her out for the exact same thing he himself did. This just seems like an effort to split town votes more, especially since he never comes back to her.

Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 08:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 08:04 Toadesstern wrote:
On January 17 2012 08:01 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 17 2012 07:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
@schworz, there are currently three serious candidates being discussed, protact, sandroba, and GGQ. That's a fine number of candiates for me.

I want to lynch Lanaia. Every post is wishywashy, and that big post with probably 30 people on it was a huge attempt to appear to be doing something. Just doesn't feel right.


she is that wishy washy as town. I don't think she's mafia at all unless she does that on purpose to look like her town play.
I'd say the first one is more likly.

I've never played with her, and regardless of it, I said I feel off. I'm trusting my gut on this one. She is mafia.

Protact is suspected strongly mafia to me and should be to everyone else, plus annoying as heck, example: They've been asked repeatedly, by multiple people, to post which one of them are posting. It's not hard or difficult to comply with that, and seems reasonable I believe. Also, THEY gained a random ass following, claimed to have had given Day one direction, when they had all of 4 posts when they claimed to have given direction to the day. Seriously. That's a load of horse manure. I don't trust protact, at all even if he pointed out ciryandor. He wasn't the first to call him out and even changed his target to BC afterwards. I won't sheep after his wishes.


More discrediting of protact. Here’s my feeling with people who call out protact, it’s fine, to be suspicious on day one when protact’s reads haven’t been shown to be correct, however at this point protact has been right about one mafia and a lot of people in the thread believe he’s on track to a second. Hindsight shows that protact is subsequently right about two more mafia and this begs the question, why is opz so certain protact is mafia? Unless you believe he was bussing, he’s already scored one kill, the worst you should be is mildly suspicious at this point. Also his reasoning is stupid. Basically it boils down to them not signing their posts and having a “random ass following.” News flash, it’s normal for people to listen to players who correctly call out scum.

Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 10:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Protactinum, Incognito/Mystlord, again, for the umpteenth time, many in the thread, myself, Lanaia, BC, and I'm sure others, have asked you to head your posts with the person posting.


More random calling out of protact simply because they don’t head their posts. This doesn’t make protact mafia lol.

Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 09:49 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 09:06 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
We have a few hours left till lynch and the majority is definitely on Macpo for now. I'm fine with this as I still think theres a good chance hes red .

At the start of the day remember that Meapak brought up that we want to keep the candidate pool small. He provided Sandroba / Protactinium / GGQ as our "primary targets". I then added Macpo to that list thanks to primarily my re-read and thoughts on Protactiniums post that Macpo is red .

As this day has went on, the two lurkers here GGQ + Macpo haven't posted much and this has led people to worry that perhaps they are just lynching a lurker and the lack of opposition to it makes them think that it will be a town flip. However I would like to point out that it would be practically impossible to "defend" macpo or GGQ based on their posts so far, so it makes sense that no one has went out in his defense solidly yet. I still believe our logic for lynching him is good and would like to get a red out of this lynch. If you haven't voted for a double lynch tomorrow please do.

On to someone else who I really feel is red. I feel like we have lots of good candidates from this post here :

+ Show Spoiler +
On January 17 2012 13:28 Foolishness wrote:
READ CAREFULLY! DON'T LOSE THIS POST! REPOST MANY TIMES

I am making this post as a way of compiling the thoughts of the few people in this game who are making sense and posting good analysis. A lot of it will be my own thoughts, but it's heavily based on a few people (should be obvious) who are the most transparent and the most obvious townies.

9 Mafia remaining. Here's the preliminary suspects: Macpo, GGQ, L. These are the people I feel we have the best case for and most of the transparent people in the thread seem to agree about these 3. Personally I think GGQ is town and we should avoid lynching him for now. Protact already gave viable reasons why Macpo is better than GGQ today, and I feel there is little to argue there. sandroba pointed out how L is acting like in Ver's game, and I couldn't agree more. We also have Incog's analysis against L.

Secondary suspects: Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees. These 3 people have garnered attention from a few people but not from everyone, so they are listed as secondary candidates. I am of the belief that all 3 of these people are mafia. evantrees is already mentioned by Incog. I think Cyber_Cheese highlighted a good summary of chaosquo here. Most of it is similar arguments to Macpo.

Bill Murray as red? I think so. Others have cast suspicion but there's not been a full analysis anywhere. A few people have commented that the election "feels" weird in some way, and I definitely sympathize. The votes for Bill Murray come across as the most suspicious: lots of random votes there. Personally I was surprised he even got into office (remember I was out all day so I saw the results without reading the previous 20 pages). I do realize I may have initially pushed him into candidacy, but I shall take responsibility for that and see to it that he's lynched in the near future. But to be simple: Bill Murray posted a lot, and got into office. Since then he's been pretty passive at the helm (so has BC I realize). That's good enough reason to warrant a ton of suspicion, as he should be actively scumhunting and posting without fear at this point.

Remaining mafia candidates: Jackal, Opz, kingjames, zeks. Incog has an analysis against Jackal as we know. I am not on board with him being mafia yet. Traditionally when he is mafia he posts paragraphs, and not one-liners. However he warrants suspicion for having an apathetic attitude.

Opz is someone who I believe Sheth was the first to cast doubt on, and I must say Sheth is definitely onto something. I know of the past Opz as a town player who is aggressive, not afraid to call people out on their bullshit. That's something we aren't seeing much of this game. He's posted a few of his own thoughts, but there is a clear lack of effort. Bored townie who is facepalming at having to read 100 pages? Possibly. Mafia hiding in the shadows? Fits better.

kingjames is called out on by Incog, and there's further analysis by BC. His last sentence is the perfect sum to kingjames: "The key thing to note is that in contrast to his town play where he is outgoing and analytical, his posts in this game are very subdued, seem artificial and feel overly planned." kingjames has yet to do anything to contradict this.

zeks I felt strongly about yesterday, he made a bad post which is nothing like his normal outspoken attitude (though it's been a while since he's played I think). He has since asked for a replacement and hasn't posted, but should still be looked at in the future.

Meapak_Ziphh is someone I would like to throw out there as a candidate (which shouldn't be a surprise from the few of my recent posts). What has Meapak done this game? Tried to get GGQ lynched, and unfortunately that's about all he's tried to do. There is a very aggressive push from him to kill this guy, which I find a little suspicious and slightly out of character.


Mafia: Macpo, GGQ, L, Bill Murray, chaosquo, evantrees, Opz, Kingjames, Meapak_Ziphh.

Substitute a few off candidates and I think we've found our 9: Jackal, BrownBear, zeks, Munk-E, other random inactive player goes here.

DONT LOSE THIS POST ITS SO IMPORTANT!

Writing all that I think the usefulness of this post is immediately made clear. The most prominent townies and the ones doing the analysis are all right on most of their reads. It's just each person has found 2-3 mafia on their own, and most of the time they are all different. Pooling this information together I realize it's hard to call anyone and their analysis wrong, as when you analyze the big picture everything fits together.

Anyone in their right mind would look at this game and think "wow this atmosphere is perfect for the mafia". Ver once told me that lots of times it's easier to find the mafia when the town atmosphere sucks because they will not be the ones causing chaos and disruption. Instead they will be sitting on the sidelines enjoying the show while the townies flail around. Look at all the names I've listed above. Everyone (yes everyone on that list) is guilty of apathy and does not have the interests of the town in mind. They are not thinking long term, or analyzing the big picture. They aren't playing the game, they are watching.

Macpo

Many others have said so, and though I may be biased, I still think it's best we lynch him today. I believe his case is still by far the strongest we have at the moment, especially since he has responded to his threats (with even more reason to kill him). At the time of writing GGQ has yet to say anything. We kill him (Macpo) today and spend the night figuring out who has the next best case. In the meantime, I'm going to be looking for connections between the above players to see if anyone can be ruled out or automatically included.

IF YOU HAVE FINISHED READING AND YOU ARE A COMPETENT TOWN PLAYER PLEASE READ AGAIN

Also, after sifting through this information, I feel we have a strong enough lead to start killing like there's no tomorrow.
##Vote: double lynch



I'd like to add my case against OpZ here as well.

His first post is as follows :

+ Show Spoiler +
On January 13 2012 15:29 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 13 2012 15:17 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote:
On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote:
/confirm

LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot.

I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again.


I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign.

My campaign is to not make a campaign post, because they're all the same (except for foolishness' so far), and they're all useless.

Generic Mayoral Campagin

I think I am the best candidate to be voted into office, these are my credentials:
  • I am Town
  • I promise to be active
  • I always do bad as scum, so even if I'm scum you can catch me (Optional: Link or reference past games)
  • I promise to lynch someone scummy (Or a lurker, or another mayoral candidate, or Kavdragon)
  • I am the best townie who ever towned
  • I like kittens and ponies, and everything innocent and pure

VOTE FOR ME!!!!!

I think this adequately describes nearly every mayoral post we will see in this game.

So, Foolishness, why do you think that Bill Murray is easier to read than any other player in the game? What games has he played, where he's shown his worth as a townie? I've only played with him twice, and they weren't exactly demonstrative of awesome play, but I don't think he was trying that hard.

IIRC, Foolishness is one of the few people that actually....supports BM? Besides myself of course. And when you know BM...You just know BM...He's not that difficult of a read. (for Wiggs and Kita) I just think its rather funny Foolishness is pushing for someone else to be mayor, when he himself dies like almost every Day one. I would rather just vote for Foolishness to be completely honest, but Kitaman as of right now is who I'm thinking of. Past games I've played with him we was pretty damned good, and he's actually wanting the position.

Are you planning on be really active Foolishness?

Also, I probably need to go to fucking bed, 1:30EST and I work at 7...-_-



Right off the bat he wants to support BM because he is "easy to read" and has however posted no content on this matter afterwards. He then suggests that Kita and Wiggles can read him. (Kita + Wiggles were both shot at last night). Interesting so far...

His second post :

+ Show Spoiler +

The Mason this game is more just about whispering it looks like. It really isn't that strong in the game. They can't create circles or nothing. They can disseminate roles privately I suppose but the threat is always there that the mason is mafia. As you yourself might be BC. I don't really see too much power in the role as of the moment. Especially if you play the game as such as to ignore pms.


Starts off by saying that Mason is a weak roll. And that people should be worried the mason is mafia (after BC claimed). And then suggests ignoring PM's as an idea. Mason however isn't a weak roll at all.

Thirdly and weirdly :
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 14 2012 06:02 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm still wondering the proper benefits to the mass mason claim. I'm neutral as again, the role seems rather bland for the town this game. Being a mason doesn't confirm you. I'd like to know the general town consensus.

So far I see Sandroba screaming for mass mason claim. Which I suppose all of the whisperers being public knowledge would be a good thing. But I don't wanna feel like sheep. I suppose theres no way around it though, or that its really important. I'm Mason #2. And I mason'd BC. But he won't talk to me. *cries*


Doesn't know about mass mason claim suggests the roll is bland, which I can understand. Doesn't want to feel like sheep. However eventually says that he is Mason #2 and that BC won't talk to him. Nothing honestly too weird here.

4th Post :


+ Show Spoiler +

Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. Welcome back.


Wants to ignore PMS again. Its not highly logical at all, its actually the opposite. It removes all logic. However after this he says that hes still going to PM Bill. Really contradictory about the Mason roll.

He then flip flops entirely within 2 posts :

First he says

On January 14 2012 15:41 ~OpZ~ wrote:

As for Palmar, I'll admit I'm seeing a difference, but I've seen this same argument against Palmar a few times. Everyone seems to attack him if he doesn't do his usual posting for mayor or what not. I'd rather he contribute more than what he has. As of right now I find him a very viable lynch candidate.



Then :


I suppose anytime is a good time, just I don't think using a mayor lynch to lynch a power player like him is a smart move. Thats really what I meant by not a good time to go after him.

Claiming not to trust him is the truest thing I've ever said, and I say it every game. I don't like following people just because they say thats the best way. I'm not gonna be sheeped around.

And I just asked you about Protact because I was asking somebody elses opinion about it also. I just wanted some discussion on a player


So he at first suggests lynching Palmar then doesn't want to go after him because he is a "power player" if I'm correct in understanding this. Also HERE IS A HUGE MISTAKE. When he says that he just asked about Protact because "I just wanted some discussion on a player". Why would you say this? You don't want just discussion on a player. You want to find out what the player and the poster thinks in depth and why. You were so against Protact and then say this its horrible. You just want their opinion and discussion... you should want to know if they are Mafia or not.

Next post : Completely unhelpful to town players :

On January 14 2012 16:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:12 Scamp wrote:
On January 14 2012 16:08 Mattchew wrote:
foolishness would have stuck with only bill murray had I not mason'd him. Now he pushes for me and bill because to him I am safe.


With this post, you will not be getting my vote, unless you post something of substance really, really soon.

Could not of said it better myself. But now that he mentions it, where the hell is BM? I'm not sold that any of the mayor candidate have a proper direction right now, and for all declaring they'd be active, they seem to be lacking.



He is VERY sure Mattchew is blue :

On January 15 2012 07:23 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm changing my vote to mattchew for reasons that I find completely obvious. Everyone else should also.


However at this point there was no reason to think he was blue, at least no real reason any better then to think BC or even Opz is blue. All he had done was claim Mason. Its somewhat a good point for you that you wanted to vote for him, however at this point it was not completely obvious.

THEN EVEN THOUGH HE IS VERY SURE ABOUT MATTCHEW; He changes his vote to L!!!!

On January 15 2012 08:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I like L's direction his post carries. They like all the extraneous drama that everyone elses had. He's also a notable scum hunter, and very successful at it. I think I'm leaving my vote for him on him actually.



No reason for this!! Only reason would be because he knows Mattchew is blue, so he just wanted to post that he thought he wasn't guilty and then to possibly go on to someone that is mafia. (Good chance L is mafia if OpZ flips red or at least slightly better chance)

Going to post this now, because I don't want it to get too long. The rest of his posts are calling out Lanaia for being scum. When pressured why he thinks this by me he suggests that hes already posted the why. However he hadn't. He then posts the why which basically is "shes not posting much interesting information". Its not because she looks scummy or has acted scummy, its simply because shes not posting much to help town. Which may seem like a good reason, but I really feel its not that great. This is his complete evidence for why Lanaia is mafia :

+ Show Spoiler +
Oh, I'm sorry. Must I dredge up all the evidence of why I feel that way.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716&currentpage=64#1267
"I really liked L up until he asked about the vig shot. However, he's redeemed himself since in my eyes. I like his posting style."

L even asked her, how did he redeem himself? Because he hadn't done shit since then.

Then she says "If three people hadn't just switched to WBG all at once, I would have voted him. It just feels kinda weird. I mean, I know it's not the end of the cycle and it won't push him into the win (iirc), but... " and just leaves it at that. Fine. Okay. The obvious reason is, despite claiming to want to, she's too concerned with looking suspicious to follow what she claims to want to do. Almost all of her posts consist of this as a premise. Being concerned about looking suspicious and voicing this concern. No real meat.
When asked to point out people she would lynch today? She picks two people I'd consider lurkers. Two people least likely to defend themselves.

Although the posts as of late, have been more town related, I'm still highly suspect, and would get behind a lynch.



So, if I do happen to die this night, I'd like this case to be top priority for tomorrow and I'm bringing it up early as I think he is red .

~OpZ~ the Mafia


most awful, and utter bull shit. Mattchew was modkilled for by the time I posted that, that which I had not known. WHY I WAS CERTAIN, was because of why he was modkilled. You could see his pms were only from Foolishness as opposed to if he was mafia, he would ALMOST CERTAINLY have atleast a pm from another person.
"Right off the bat he wants to support BM because he is "easy to read" and has however posted no content on this matter afterwards. He then suggests that Kita and Wiggles can read him. (Kita + Wiggles were both shot at last night). Interesting so far..."
What did you do? Just click my filter and read my posts out of context?

The portion was dedicated to Kita and Wiggles, FOR AS TO WHY I would say Foolishness would push BM as a candidate, not with regards to Kita and Wiggles reading BM. Has Wiggles even played a game with BM, (or am I confusing him with Meapak)?

Masons are terribly weak in this game in my opinion BESIDES in mafia hands. Sure, I can bounce ideas off one person in PM, OR I CAN BOUNCE THEM OFF THE ENTIRE THREAD. I believe this is something me and BC were in agreement about.

Then you point out me asking you about protact?!

Holy fucking shit son. I haven't been the harbinger of Protact is mafia or anything this game. Oh no. I asked Scamp, WHO HAS BEEN MIGHTY QUIET, about Protact changing from Ciryandor to wanting to lynch BC, WHO I HAD the strongest town read on. Get this trash out of my face you protact following scum. I've done pointed out you buddying him once.

The portion about voting L instead of Mattchew, because I knew he was blue? MATTCHEW WAS DEAD, by the point. Jesus fucking christ. Learn to build a case proper.

You mad cuz I pointed you out for buddying your scum buddy protact?

So lets note, everything you have as a case against me is:
A) wrong
B) out of context
C) a lie

While me pointing you out for voting for protact for no reason still stands, with the amazing defense of, "You didn't point anyone else out for voting for protact!!"
On January 14 2012 07:23 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
On January 14 2012 07:10 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 14 2012 07:01 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
On January 14 2012 06:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Sheth....For real? That is your reason for voting for someones who already stated that their activity will be waning? Would all it take to get you to change to BC or Sandroba be a declaration of lynching Ciry or is it just because he has already chosen his lynch target?

Bill, I don't really think Sandroba is scum because he called for a mason mass claim. So did BC in a round-a-bout way. I personally don't view the role with much power, so I don't know. I've been trying all day to think of a way to make it useful, but seriously, just ignoring pms this game seems the most highly logical play I could think of. I mean, I'm still gonna try and pm you. <3 Ya Buddddddddy. Welcome back.



They haven't stated their activity will be waning. No just switching to lynching Cir wouldn't cause me to switch my vote.


That was stated prior to the game start. I'm just curious as to your reasons for voting for them and the only reason I find is he is willing to lynch ciry. You didn't really say as to why and I found that scummy, so I guess it begs the question, why are you voting for protact?



You find a small point of my post, and call it scummy. You haven't complained about anyone else's votes and yet you consider that scummy. I wasn't even the first person to put my vote on him, but once its possibly gaining steam you point out that what I'm doing is scummy. You've also claimed to be our second Mason for those who missed it, as I didn't realize it until I read your filter.


In this post: He makes no mention of his reason for voting Protactinum, blatantly ignoring my question.


So I wanna take all these posts together as one. This is why I brought up sheth earlier. This is his big case, this is his was his push when he was alive. Analyzing and calling out opz. He actually doesn’t have half bad of a case, I won’t rehash it, it’s all in the spoilers. However it’s not Sheth’s case that is the big deal here, it’s opz’s reaction. All the neutrality and careful posting have flown away in the sudden face of raw fear of being lynched. It’s actually very strange how agitated and aggressive opz becomes when sheth calls him out. He pulls out the bold, all caps, and swear words, going waaaay over board. If you’re innocent, you know it and you can approach someone’s claims with rational thought because deep down you KNOW you’re town. Scum don’t have that luxury, when they get called out they have nowhere to run because they know the accusations are correct. I know this fear, I felt it in PYP:I, it makes you wanna either lurk or just go balls to the walls berserk on the person who called you out because there’s nothing you can do to stop them from being right. Opz’s change of tone in this post is hugely scummy before we even get to it’s content. But that said, let’s take a peek at the content. His first part about mattchew is incoherent at best, it seems like he’s saying he’s voting for mattchew because he flipped when he was modkilled :/. He emphasizes the weakness of masons, which is funny considering that he’s supposed to be a mason. He claims he hasn’t been the harbinger of mafia against protact which is pretty funny considering when you read his filter (as he suggests you do), there are certainly a lot of posts dedicated to protact. He ends his defense with some fairly nasty attacks of sheth for no reason, personally insulting him and then OMGUSing as well. Quite frankly I find this post to be worthy of a lynch in of itself, there is nothing townie about this defense, instead it’s about opz screaming “you’re wrong and you’re bad” in all caps and in bold. When this is added to his earlier behavior the case becomes more solid, and that isn’t even the icing on the cake. Guess who died last night? The one and only Liquid’Sheth. Why did sheth, a relatively new player and someone who hasn’t proved themselves as a stone cold scum killer warrant a hit? A look through his filter provides the answer. His life was almost completely dedicated to lynching GGQ. Sheth has done this before. In responsibility he correctly nailed the final scum and was then shot at night.

So I ask to consider all of this. Opz’s posts before being called out by sheth, his terrible post defending himself, and sheth’s subsequent death. Opz is mafia.

@BC since you apparently harbor suspcions of me please post them so we can deal with it.

My first vote will stay on GGQ, I'll decide my second by tomorrow afternoon.



On January 20 2012 15:04 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 20 2012 14:47 Nisani201 wrote:
On January 20 2012 14:40 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On January 20 2012 14:29 Nisani201 wrote:
Meapak, your case against Opz is not very good. You are basically calling him scum for being wrong (about Protact), while throwing in some mafia kill WIFOM.

I guess you didn't read it then lol. If you had you'd know those are two supporting tenets not the main idea.

OK then fine, you're calling him out for being consistent and pressuring against Protact...

Chainsaw much?

LOL wow you still didn't read it (or you fail at reading comprehension). He pressures protact when it's fairly obvious protact was town (scummy) and then when sheth calls him out on it he completely backtracks and claims he wasn't a big force against protact (ridiculous contradiction which looks extremely scummy).

Please, if you're going to comment at least understand what's going on.

Meapak, Please follow your own advice.

Excuse me? I claim I wasn't a big force against protract, I called myself the Harbinger of Protract is Mafia....I think that's like me calling myself the guy screaming "HE IS MAFIA" or did you miss that?...Oh I get it, Sarcasm didn't translate well...I thought the "Oh No" gave it away. Or the extra examples of me asking other players about him. Or everyone else that understood it was sarcastic. My bad he was fucking DT, but he was UNCOOPERATIVE, bothersome, and unwilling to agree. Not to mention his immediate following *note*before ever having popped a single mafia, and his claiming to provide direction in the thread when in reality, he hadn't done anything at that point. Sorry- I don't sheep.

Followed by two more posts of defending/soft defending sandroba....See the theme here guys?

I think I'm done here.

Meapak is Scum.



Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:42 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:34 wherebugsgo wrote:
what does everyone think of hiro?

I'm rather curious.

He's tunnelled against Sandroba. Bases much of his argument on meta, which I don't attach much note to. He subbed in so not much to go on yet. His case against sandroba might be pretty legit rereading his post, but I've also noticed he provided no contrast to how Sandroba plays as town so he isn't showing a difference. Very one sided argument someone on the mafia team would use. But I'm going with a null read as of the moment.


Undermining credibility, but then more importantly:

NOTE THE WORDAGE

either the case is bullshit or the case is legit. OpZ straddles the line and he's all like "oh yeah hiro is tunneling sandro and he has no case since it's all meta...and he hasn't done the proper meta comparisons...but then again his case might have merit" He calls the case one-sided, something mafia would do, but then why the fuck would he say the case might have merit?

Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:29 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:26 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 07:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:45 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:16 ~OpZ~ wrote:
[quote]

You forgot my name or did I cease being a suspect to you? Or is it you just want to keep changing suspects to create chaos?

*Add ~OpZ~ to his list plz.


Oh yeah, I forgot you. I'd put you on the probable kill list since you actually pointed that out.

Who do you want to lynch?


I voted who I wanted to lynch. I've posted my reasons. Read my posts instead of blindly calling me scum. It makes you look scummy. Scum.


I have read your posts. You had a scum read on Lanaia and on BM as well. You reprimanded foolishness for suspecting you. However, I don't recall you putting your vote in this thread.

I'm on my phone right now, so I'm too lazy to change threads and try to hunt through pages to find your vote. I also donMt particularly care, for reasons that should slowly become apparent to people who are reading this right now.


You ignored my issues with protactinum. Which I'm starting to get fed up with tbh.

Again. I'm going to say it. He claimed to have provided the thread with direction with only having four posts, two of which were EXTREMELY unsubstantial, changed his lynch target (if elected) from someone now confirmed as mafia, to BC, who I view with my strongest town read. Not to mention all the random early votes he received with absolutely no reasoning. But hey, who cares what I say.


Nah, just forgot. You like jumping to conclusions, don't you?

Now I think here's where I jump to the conclusion that you ignored how I hated on Protac too. Oh but wait, that's your job, not mine. Sorry, I'm bad at this roleplaying shit.




Yet my vote rests on protact and yours doesn't. I'm supporting my case with what action the only action I can.


It was on Protact. I'd rather vote someone who actually has a chance of being lynched today. So far there is no indication that a Protactinium lynch will succeed.


And this passive attitude is what sheep are made of.

called me a sheep here despite the fact that I wasn't actually sheeping.

This kind of confused me when he first did it, because it made me realize how much OpZ wasn't actually reading the thread.

I brushed it off at first because I thought there were better targets at the time, but now it's reminding me that OpZ hasn't had town interests in mind (no reading lul)


Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 07:15 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 18 2012 06:47 hiro protagonist wrote:
I care about what you say ~OpZ~ <3

what do you think of sandro?

You care what I say, but don't say if you agree with it or not?
I feel like I'm just questioning sheth about why he voted for protag again. Another four posts just to get a response on what I've said.

Half the people in this thread can't seem to get Sandro's story straight, or are confused he claimed mason. I've facepalmed repeatedly about this, but maybe it's because I've actually read BC's posts. So I haven't given him much thought. Care to give me some time to look at him so I can give a better opinion? So far all my notes say are that he shouldn't post while drunk. And this one interesting note when I was reading him and BC's chatlogs, he was actually pressing Ciryandor. So I'm going with he's more likely town than protactinum.



defended sandro, but says "I haven't given him much thought," probably to absolve himself of responsibility if and when sandro flips scum.

Every single post that includes sandro or someone else scummy there's some bullshit excuse in there about how he hasn't paid attention to them or whatever. It's extremely suspicious because if those people flip scum (which he should know if he actually is scum) he can slither away from having to talk about them.

OpZ seemed to have difficulty talking about sandro repeatedly despite being asked over and over what he thought about him.



Also, part of the reason I've been relatively more inactive since last week is because I've started school, though that is technically completely irrelevant to my alignment.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:04 GMT
#3994
RAPEAGE LOL

At least I now know I wasn't just paranoid about Munk-E and that schworz guy, he was fucking weird.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:06 GMT
#3996
Votes for Bill Murray (11) Second
Macpo
Toadesstern
rgTheSchworz
Jackal58
GiygaS
Munk-E
EchelonTee
Nisani201
Mr. Wiggles
Ciryandor
kitaman27

lul

the rest of the names don't look particularly good either. Maybe at least one more red in there.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:07 GMT
#3998
also: Foolishness
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:09 GMT
#4006
On January 24 2012 12:07 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 12:06 wherebugsgo wrote:
Votes for Bill Murray (11) Second
Macpo
Toadesstern
rgTheSchworz
Jackal58
GiygaS
Munk-E
EchelonTee
Nisani201
Mr. Wiggles
Ciryandor
kitaman27

lul

the rest of the names don't look particularly good either. Maybe at least one more red in there.


Just helps solidify my take on Toad.


ja.

I agree.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:09 GMT
#4007
On January 24 2012 12:08 Foolishness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 12:07 wherebugsgo wrote:
also: Foolishness

What


what was all that BM bullshit on day 1?

Just trolling us?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:16 GMT
#4019
Someone vig OpZ, for the love of god...
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:18 GMT
#4024
On January 24 2012 12:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Strongest 3 reads going into the next day.

Opz, glurio.


If I die, obviously both my bgs are red and their names have already been outed.

However, based on how bm was playing and comments made throughout this thread I believe that chances are fairly good that at least 1 of my bgs is red.

Also, awesome modkills, and fu BM


BC that's two reads, not 3...

lul

also I agree with you. The third I'd say is a toss up between like, Brownbear, Echelontee, vaderseven, and Toad.

Ofc I'm only including Toad in there now because it's been fun trolling him for the past day when I actually haven't even believed he's scum.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:20 GMT
#4026
Oh throw Lanaia in there too, simply because BM jailed her.

I actually feel Lanaia is more likely to be town because of it, and if OpZ flips scum she's almost guaranteed to be town, but I just want to be safe. We have plenty of time to lynch through people, and so we should be working through people like this, IMO:

OpZ and BB tomorrow

Two of Echelon/vader/Hiro/Lanaia if one of those flips town.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:21 GMT
#4027
yeah wtf why do I keep forgetting about bum?
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:22 GMT
#4030
On January 24 2012 12:21 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 12:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 12:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Strongest 3 reads going into the next day.

Opz, glurio.


If I die, obviously both my bgs are red and their names have already been outed.

However, based on how bm was playing and comments made throughout this thread I believe that chances are fairly good that at least 1 of my bgs is red.

Also, awesome modkills, and fu BM


BC that's two reads, not 3...

lul

also I agree with you. The third I'd say is a toss up between like, Brownbear, Echelontee, vaderseven, and Toad.

Ofc I'm only including Toad in there now because it's been fun trolling him for the past day when I actually haven't even believed he's scum.


oh come on screw you. People like VE and Jitsu are actually believing what you're saying... You think it's going to be helpful when we try to get opz lynched tomorrow and CC, VE and jitsu are voting me instead?


LOL
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:24 GMT
#4035
On January 24 2012 12:22 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 12:12 Toadesstern wrote:
On January 24 2012 12:10 Jitsu wrote:
On January 24 2012 12:07 Toadesstern wrote:
LOOL


Nervous giggle.


you haven't given me a single reason why you think I am mafia, same goes for wbg. VE thinks I'm mafia because I did not believe his claim because of that random pattern+ I did not know you can't RB vets, which was a huge deal for me because that explains why mafia did not RB him.

But yeah sure, lynch the guy who lynched macpo, made everyone voted Sandroba and lynched BM.


Other than the fact that you purposefully try to take credit for Red kills? Try to shove suspicion away from Bill Murray (also voting for him in as Sheriff) and discredit BC endlessly? I just looked back three pages out of 19 in you're filter. It all seems forced.

Stop looking at shit you think you should take credit for and actually do legit scum-hunting please.


This is 100% true though, Toad. It's actually almost entirely the reason you look shifty.

At this point ofc I seriously doubt you're scum, since by process of elimination there are like 5 or 6 people who are more worthy of a lynch than you.

Anyway Jitsu, of the players remaining which 3 are most likely scum to you? I feel like opz and BB are like almost 100% scum.

Kenpachi probably is too cause BM was like "wtf did I say Kitaman? I meant kenpachi!"
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:42 GMT
#4053
On January 24 2012 12:38 Slardar wrote:
Mason hunting.. well technically with how it's worded Mafia could have 0 masons, that is if they hypothetically can choose not to have any Roleblockers...considering most of the scum have claimed RB.

So can Mafia type out GG if they want to and throw in the towel?

Well this more than exonerates BC in my eyes, I was pretty much wrong on every call! Time to do the exact opposite of what I'm thinking. I'm Arsonist, you're all fucked.


what the hell is this
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:42 GMT
#4055
On January 24 2012 12:41 hiro protagonist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 12:28 kitaman27 wrote:
On January 24 2012 12:24 hiro protagonist wrote:
On January 24 2012 12:13 kitaman27 wrote:
On January 24 2012 12:12 kitaman27 wrote:
Props to BM for earning himself an extra day of life and causing a mislynch with his silly claim :p

It should be noted that if mafia doesn't have a roleblocker, it is very likely the rb was on hiro, if he is indeed our dt.


Err by rb, I mean sheriff jail.

nope, I asked FW about this, If someone is jailed, they get a message saying they are incarcerated.
They get a message that they where roleblocked if they are roleblocked.

So mafia still has a roleblocker, as I was told I was roleblocked, not incarcerated.


Is your night two check still alive?

Yes.


who is it?

Reveal it right before the flip tonight.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 03:48 GMT
#4063
If he's town he should be revealing right before deadline.

Why he hasn't revealed already is still weird.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 05:33 GMT
#4167
holy fuck CC you are still bad
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-24 05:44:37
January 24 2012 05:44 GMT
#4187
I caught opz and bum day 1 but then I tunneled Palmar too hard.

And I kept forgetting bum. Man -_-

ah well. Sorry guys for the lack of effort I had this game. I would have rather been playing in a mini game anyway and this might be the last game of this size I choose to play. I don't enjoy any games larger than 20 players anymore.

GG to all!

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 05:55 GMT
#4215
On January 24 2012 14:47 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 14:44 wherebugsgo wrote:
I caught opz and bum day 1 but then I tunneled Palmar too hard.

And I kept forgetting bum. Man -_-

ah well. Sorry guys for the lack of effort I had this game. I would have rather been playing in a mini game anyway and this might be the last game of this size I choose to play. I don't enjoy any games larger than 20 players anymore.

GG to all!


I refuse to say you caught me. You just wouldn't go away. But I wasn't worried about you. No one in town listened to you, and I was your only "correct" read iirc


Yep, no one listened because I was wrong about Palmar and I wasn't playing well.

I realized that myself after Palmar flipped town that no one would care what I had to say. After that I just lost interest in the game and I kept saying I needed to read but I never read lol.

But yes, I did catch you day 1. Toad I just trolled cause it was funny as hell and super never responded properly..
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 06:02 GMT
#4231
On January 24 2012 14:56 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
Also WBG, I'm glad I changed my view on you. Thought you were mafia at start, but by the end I thought you were pretty townie.


lol my bad, I tunnel too hard a lot.

Also at night it's generally not wise to listen to things I say because at night I don't say what I actually think (unless it's right before deadline). I do this to bait reactions.

I made the prediction that scum would want to lock down lynch on Meapak based on the GGQ death on what happened that previous night. Toad I had a town read on right after based on the fact that he called me out on something, but when OpZ came in with the case on Meapak I was assured he was scum. That's why I switched the vote off BM onto him; my read was solidified by that.

Other than that I played terribly, my day 1 was horrible and I should've just accepted the fact that Palmar was playing badly.

Props to BC for not getting discouraged like I did.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 06:04 GMT
#4237
On January 24 2012 14:59 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 14:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 14:47 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 24 2012 14:44 wherebugsgo wrote:
I caught opz and bum day 1 but then I tunneled Palmar too hard.

And I kept forgetting bum. Man -_-

ah well. Sorry guys for the lack of effort I had this game. I would have rather been playing in a mini game anyway and this might be the last game of this size I choose to play. I don't enjoy any games larger than 20 players anymore.

GG to all!


I refuse to say you caught me. You just wouldn't go away. But I wasn't worried about you. No one in town listened to you, and I was your only "correct" read iirc


Yep, no one listened because I was wrong about Palmar and I wasn't playing well.

I realized that myself after Palmar flipped town that no one would care what I had to say. After that I just lost interest in the game and I kept saying I needed to read but I never read lol.

But yes, I did catch you day 1. Toad I just trolled cause it was funny as hell and super never responded properly..

Be humble. You just had fail argument, and all you did was tunnel EVERYONE.

I could of posted I was mafia in thread, you could of quoted me, and still everyone would of wrote you off as "this guy is tunneling opz some more"


I just said no one was listening to me because I was wrong lol.

I accept I played badly, I even admitted n1 no one was going to listen to me because I was wrong about Palmar. That's the misfortune of being a vocal player; if you're wrong once, no one ever listens to you again.

That's why players like Foolishness are so good and renowned; they're rarely wrong the first time.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 06:07 GMT
#4246
On January 24 2012 15:06 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 15:04 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 14:59 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 24 2012 14:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
On January 24 2012 14:47 ~OpZ~ wrote:
On January 24 2012 14:44 wherebugsgo wrote:
I caught opz and bum day 1 but then I tunneled Palmar too hard.

And I kept forgetting bum. Man -_-

ah well. Sorry guys for the lack of effort I had this game. I would have rather been playing in a mini game anyway and this might be the last game of this size I choose to play. I don't enjoy any games larger than 20 players anymore.

GG to all!


I refuse to say you caught me. You just wouldn't go away. But I wasn't worried about you. No one in town listened to you, and I was your only "correct" read iirc


Yep, no one listened because I was wrong about Palmar and I wasn't playing well.

I realized that myself after Palmar flipped town that no one would care what I had to say. After that I just lost interest in the game and I kept saying I needed to read but I never read lol.

But yes, I did catch you day 1. Toad I just trolled cause it was funny as hell and super never responded properly..

Be humble. You just had fail argument, and all you did was tunnel EVERYONE.

I could of posted I was mafia in thread, you could of quoted me, and still everyone would of wrote you off as "this guy is tunneling opz some more"


I just said no one was listening to me because I was wrong lol.

I accept I played badly, I even admitted n1 no one was going to listen to me because I was wrong about Palmar. That's the misfortune of being a vocal player; if you're wrong once, no one ever listens to you again.

That's why players like Foolishness are so good and renowned; they're rarely wrong the first time.


I'm going to be more modest the next game but I was really raging mad because of you lol.
When there was like 3 people attacking me d2 I stopped taking notes and only went by gutfeeling :p


HAHA sorry I had to entertain myself somehow.

Sorry Toad :p

I really trusted super on you though, because I felt he was town, so I was going to believe whatever he said about your alignment. I probed you super hard because I thought you would be a good way to bait other people.

That Meapak thing was fucking perfect.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 08:25 GMT
#4311
On January 24 2012 16:56 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
So here’s a little bit of my perspective on this game. I came in with a ton of confidence after responsibility and thus had a pretty good faith in my own scum hunting abilities. Secondly, I had requested Vet from Flamewheel because a) I’m really done with dying night one and b) I wanted to see if I could get shot if I tried. From the standpoint of fulfilling my role for the town this game I actually failed, if I’m not getting shot night one or at the very latest night two I’m doing it wrong. I’ll just take you all through my thoughts of how things went.

I started the game fairly certain that I would be town. When I got my Vet role I immediately set about trying to be as noticed as possible. I didn’t necessarily need to be right, I just needed to make sense and look like I would be right somewhere down the road. Unfortunately for me personally, with BC/L/Bum/Foolishness/Incognito/Bill in the game I was at a recognition disadvantage. These players WILL take up discussion in the thread regardless of what I say (short of claiming scum ). However several things worked initially in my favor. L was gone for a lot of the day, Foolishness was making people suspicious, Incog had attracted his share of detractors, Bill was being Bill, and BC was the only person making sense. In this opening I decided to run for mayor. Now from the start I knew I wouldn’t win. Big names have the advantage of being memorable and I just wouldn’t garner the support with those guys in there. But I needed my name getting mentioned as someone who was making sense. The way I saw it, if my name wasn’t mentioned in a positive light at least once every two pages I was failing. As a Vet, it’s my job to appear as protown as possible and to make mafia scared. They don’t even have to be scared of what I’m doing right now; they need to be scared of what I can do.

So I got my mayor campaign underway with GGQ as my lynch target. I was mentioned several times day one as someone who was making sense, however as I had expected, discussion of the big names drowned out any noise I was making. When BC made his mason claim I saw an opportunity. I had expected people would get all over him for it like they did, however at this point I was getting significant town vibes from him and so I took his side and supported him early after his claim when a lot of people were screaming at him. I still have no idea why he claimed, however I was confident he wasn’t mafia and wanted to be seen as unafraid to stand up and give an opinion. Similarly with the whole Palmar deal, when people started calling for his head I stood up and defended him because I assumed he had a plan, and I felt reasonably certain that scum wouldn’t just roll over like he was.

When day one was over, I felt pretty good. My read on Palmar had been correct, GGQ had only acted worse, BC had been elected and despite the Palmar lynch I still felt good about him. However when day rolled around and I hadn’t died I was super pissed. I read my filter and decided that I hadn’t been active enough or aggressive enough to warrant a shot. Never did it cross my mind that I was simply wrong. With the newfound resolve to take the thread and force it where I wanted, I came out day two guns blazing.

This was my biggest mistake of the game. I still feel that my case on GGQ was good, hell Incog agreed for a while. But in trying to be aggressive I allowed myself to tunnel. Now I don’t think I’ve ever hardcore tunneled someone before. Ever. I’ve played almost 20 games and I’ve always tried to remain open towards new developments. However in my quest to gain attention and seize control of the thread (since at the time it seemed like neither foolishness nor incog felt like leading) I put blinders on and ignored everything else. I defended Incog and Sandroba whenever I wasn’t going after GGQ. Incog I thought was obvious, he had called ciry and he agreed with me on GGQ. However I flat out screwed up on sandroba. I’ll confess, I never read his filter the entire day 2 and just assumed he was town since he had pushed GGQ, my assumption was that since I was the only one pushing GGQ, a mafia wouldn’t want to draw attention to the case and since GGQ was mafia… Not one of my better moments all around.

My sharp increase in aggressiveness and activity also backfired. While it was intended to look protown, it actually got people nervous. No one in the game had ever seen me play like that and a lot of people were understandably skittish of associating with me. I could see this happening at the time, however when GGQ flipped scum I figured people would come back to me. I got in a stupid spat with toad as well; however it probably helped me a lot in hindsight. Caught up in the moment I decided that toad must be wrong since his reads were so bad (he was pushing sandroba -_-). However upon reading back through his filter, I couldn’t find anything overtly scummy and at the same time I was exposed to a lot of `roba’s posts which started me thinking a bit. Obviously I couldn’t pull a 360 and stop pushing GGQ (especially when I still thought he was scum), however I was opening up to voting for someone else. When Incog swept in with his macpo case I saw my opportunity, jumped off the GGQ ship and voted macpo. Macpo died, I was even more certain that BC/Foolishness/Incog were town, but I still had GGQ to lynch and I hadn’t actually made myself look more protown.

When the day came and I still hadn’t taken a shot I was starting to get frustrated. I’ve been killed night one three or four times and now that I was trying to get hit it wasn’t working. So I changed styles for the third time in as many days. This style is probably the closest to how I’d play VT except with more analysis. Because of my tunneling GGQ, I felt like I had locked myself up to a certain extent; however I realized I needed to do some reading and find some more scum. It was through this reading that I came upon opz and bum. The problem was, both were gut reads with very little substance. Also, I was bleeding credibility in the thread as both townies and mafia were taking potshots at me. I was in no danger of being lynched, however my opinions were in danger of being relegated to the place WBG’s were.

I did have a few things going for me; I read through my own filter a lot and was pretty familiar with anything that could be possibly construed against me. This allowed me to respond accurately and without contradicting myself in a timely manner. I was also pretty sure that the “Big three” couldn’t lynch me. Call it ego or whatever, but I think I could have fought off a lynch. Plus town was skittish of them working together so I think a combined effort by them would have set too many people off. Plus I had the added benefit that Incog thought I was town, in his own words he thought I was trying to be “the town hero” which was surprisingly accurate for my day two goals. Given this sense of security I felt free to go after opz even though I knew my case wasn’t very good. A lot of it did rely on kill WIFOM and sheth’s old analysis. However I personally had faith in Sheth. His analysis and subsequent death had an eerie feel of déjà vu about them from responsibility mafia. With the case against opz I was able to relieve a bit of the tension that came from being locked into one person

At this point I was fairly certain I wouldn’t be hit. I had so far failed to put any major pressure on the mafia and while I was right about bum and opz, I didn’t have the credibility to effectively go after them. I started scheming up ways of grabbing the spotlight during the night. I eventually settled upon a plan to fake claim DT at the start of night four. I’d claim to have gotten scum checks on GGQ night one and opz night three and that I had got role blocked night 2. I was still sure about my reads and wanted to give the mafia a reason to shoot at me. However the dawn of the day squashed any hope in that plan.

With GGQ’s death I was 100% certain that the mafia was setting me up with frankly pissed me off, they obviously thought I would be the easiest mislynch and that just made me mad. Thankfully, the whole BM drama from the previous day was still going on and I was able to lie lower and collect myself. I’ll speak briefly about the BM situation for a sec. At all costs I wanted to avoid losing Incog. For me, no matter how anti-town Bill had acted there was still the chance he was telling the truth. I have to give you props here Bill, you said post game you were trying to play dopey `ole Bill who would do things off the cuff, I have to say well played sir. I didn’t buy it 100%, I didn’t even buy it 50%, but losing Incog would have been too big a blow. However with Incog’s death and the whole Bill or BC thing going on, I decided to take this day to get my reads straight and be ready when Bum/opz came for me the following day.

At this point I felt like the thread had an equal chance of going after me as it did leaving me be. I was certain after Incog’s death and BM’s subsequent bumbling that he would flip scum which would leave BC as all but confirmed. With both Foolishness and BC calling for my death I wasn’t so certain I could fight off a lynch if both mafia and town was against me. With this in mind I asked BC to mason me in hopes that I could change his mind. As luck would have it, GGQ’s death had already started to change it, but me masoning him ended up being the smartest thing I did. Between the two of us we solidified opz and bum as the next day’s targets and we (or at least for me) cleared toad, BrownBear, slardar, bugs, ja22, and p4ndemik. We (or again maybe this was just me) did have a misstep when we started getting suspicious of hiro. This was mostly my fault however we were prepared to go after hiro once bum and opz were dead.

The day ended with BM’s death and the modkills. It was kinda disappointing to be honest, with the stuff that was starting to happen that night, BC and I would have realized that hiro was legit and started looking elsewhere. With Bug’s help (who had just started showing interest again) we could have lynched opz easy and bum as well without too much difficulty. However the game ended before I could get redemption for my earlier tunneling of GGQ.




Now I’m going to talk a little bit about play style. In my opinion (preface, all the following is my opinion), there are two types of players, those who put in effort and those who don’t. Of those who try, they’re broken down into two groups as well; the analysts whose page long write-ups catch scum with chilling accuracy, and the diplomats who control the thread via frequent posting.

The analysts are by and large older players. Ver is probably their king. They don’t need to post a lot, they save their words for their magnum opuses which absolutely destroy the scum team. They’re rarely pressured except by newer players who don’t understand their power. They’re not always effective early game but if given time they will find you. They’re the type who get shot night one (at least by a competent mafia team ) every game because of the threat they pose, even if it means double or triple stacking. Incog played a fairly typical analyst style this game.

The other type is the diplomat. I use diplomat very roughly, because the players who fall into this category are anything but diplomatic. Palmar is probably the best example of a diplomat. He doesn’t need huge posts to find scum, he instead relies on constant thread presence and extremely aggressive sometimes bullying behavior. The diplomat applies constant, doglike, pressure which breaks down the veneer scum hide behind. They don’t always get killed night one because their actions sometimes get misconstrued as scum intentions. However, the diplomat actually had a better chance of finding scum day one. Unlike the analyst, diplomats don’t need a day or two to start seeing patterns, instead they bully people around until they find someone who doesn’t react appropriately.

Now these are both gross generalizations. After all, Incog found a scum day one and analysts like him have done it before. However I’m using it as an example. My preferred role is that of the analyst. I don’t have enough time to dominate a thread 24 hours a day, and neither do I have the personality to go after people like there’s no tomorrow (and when I do I lose track of the bigger picture). In short, I don’t have the features of a diplomat. However, analysts rely a lot on their names. Take for example Sheth versus Incog. Sheth wrote an analysis of opz, was it great? No. Was he right? Yes! Incog wrote an analysis of BC, was it good? Yes. Was he right? No. However who got more attention? We spent a significant portion of day 1 debating Incog’s incorrect analysis. Sheth’s analysis got shot down in an extremely scummy manner and no one batted an eye. This is nothing against Incog, it’s just illustrating a fact that in order to maximize the analyst role you have to have an established name to get people to listen to you over the chaff in the thread.

Contrast that to the diplomat. A lot of newer players play the diplomat effectively and without a name like Incog. They don’t find the whole scum team alone, but three or four diplomats in a game of 30 can easily win it for the town. Especially since diplomats aren’t as high level targets as analysts, they have greater survivability.

Now I’ll cut to the chase and explain why I brought this up. Most games I play a second tier analyst. Sure I don’t destroy the scum team but I may nail one and I’ll at least establish my innocence. However as a Vet I felt like I needed to be more active to gain the mafia’s attention. Thus on day two I tried to play as the diplomat. I thankfully had some time which allowed me to be fairly active; however I was still constrained since I just don’t like playing the diplomat style. This is why I changed so drastically on day 2. I needed to raise my profile, and since my name isn’t big enough to get hit as an analyst (especially in a game stacked with big names); I tried to go it as a diplomat. The results of course are in the thread. Day three I was in damage control mode and tried to return to my normal style without drawing suspicion and day four I was in PM land with BC.

Anyway, I really enjoyed the game a lot. Despite not getting hit, I still had a few good reads and I learned a valuable lesson about tunneling. I may try playing the diplomat all game long someday if I have the time but I think I’ll probably just work to improve the analyst.

GG all, thanks for hosting FW and Jcarl!


The problem for you and I was that Palmar and GGQ did not react in the ways we expected them to react.

They were both so apathetic that we ended up tunneling them harder. Normally, with players who are of GGQ's and Palmar's caliber, this would actually work. In this game, it ended up screwing us over because they were both just bored and lazy.

This is why when GGQ ended up dying to the shot I KNEW they were trying to lock down the lynch on you. It was grossly obvious and made you look incredibly town, because if you tunneled someone that hard as scum there was no way you were going to just turn around and let your team shoot them. Plus, since GGQ legitimately had done nothing all game there was no reason for scum to shoot him to begin with.

There was a reason why I never pushed your lynch in the thread. At times I said "hmmm Meapak looks funny" to see if I'd get reactions, and often times it was just the same townies over and over, going "Meapak is tunneling too hard wtf"

The GGQ shot was a poor choice by scum. Why scum didn't shoot Incog or Foolishness earlier is beyond me. Day 1 I found Protact scummy based on how the candidacies unfolded, but quickly after Ciryandor flipped scum I began having doubts. I also had huge doubts about BM when he received a bunch of votes late in the day in response to the votes myself and super put on BC. That was incredibly strange to me and I found it strange that people actually thought BM was town.

For me n1 was when I just kinda gave up on the game and started half trolling half flailing around like a retard. I realized that I had no chance of being taken seriously because Palmar flipped town and a lot of people hated me for it. Luckily, BC got off fairly easily (somehow) and he didn't give up. I was angry at myself for being so aggressive when it had netted me nothing.

What was frustrating as well was that I was being criticized by townies (like Scamp) who were themselves not doing anything. At that point I just kinda omgused him because I felt like it. (bad idea on my part) Good thing was, though, no one listened to me. When scamp died I wondered if they were trying to focus the lynch on me, but realized that a case on me would be incredibly difficult to make (this is similar to how Meapak said he knew everything that was going on in his own filter.)

I was never scared of, for example, VE calling me scum, because I knew the accusation would never stick. There was nothing in my play to actually call me scum for. I was just playing badly.

At any rate I think I've learned a valuable lesson. I need to be more patient on day 1, particularly with vets who are playing like they are just bored (or are trolling). Brownbear was an example of a vet who could potentially have met the same fate as Palmar day 1. I also need to value credibility more, since for the most part on day 1 I do whatever to poke at people to get reactions out of them. A lot of the time it isn't helpful, because some people who are (for whatever reason) genuinely disinterested in the game at that point will not react the way you expect them to react, no matter their alignment.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 08:48 GMT
#4316
On January 24 2012 17:45 Scamp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 17:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
What was frustrating as well was that I was being criticized by townies (like Scamp) who were themselves not doing anything. At that point I just kinda omgused him because I felt like it. (bad idea on my part) Good thing was, though, no one listened to me. When scamp died I wondered if they were trying to focus the lynch on me, but realized that a case on me would be incredibly difficult to make (this is similar to how Meapak said he knew everything that was going on in his own filter.)


You still think I wasn't doing anything? Did you notice that I correctly identified you as just playing badly instead of scum?

Okay perhaps I didn't go crazy like you, toad, jayjay, etc. but the way I saw it you guys were just adding to the chaos for no reason. I didn't really feel the need to contribute heavily when so much was going well. There was no threat of me dying, and as it turned out the mafia thought I was a heavy blue.


well, I feel like it was pretty obvious I was playing badly. Is saying that contributing anything new? IMO, not really.

In terms of actual contribution to the game, as townies we have two responsibilities:

1. Find scum and kill them

2. Establish ourselves as town.

I failed on #1 but I think for the most part I was okay on #2. No one really thought I was scum beyond VE, and at no point did I ever feel threatened by lynch.

If you're not trying to find scum, then what are you doing? I dunno. At no point did I feel like you were actively looking for scum. That's why I was so harsh on you. It wasn't personal or anything (so sorry if I rubbed you the wrong way) but when people don't actually scumhunt, and then berate others for being wrong, it's incredibly frustrating because they can't possibly be wrong when they don't try to begin with.

There's this famous hockey quote (or something like that) that says you miss 100% of the shots you don't take.

Anyway, big thanks to Flamewheel and jcarl for hosting!
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
January 24 2012 10:08 GMT
#4320
On January 24 2012 19:00 Incognito wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2012 17:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
The GGQ shot was a poor choice by scum.

GGQ was shot by a town vigilante, not the mafia.


and this proves how much I suck at this game
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Serral vs CureLIVE!
Solar vs Classic
EWC_Arena14221
ComeBackTV 3253
TaKeTV 701
Hui .612
3DClanTV 366
Fuzer 357
Rex263
JimRising 257
EnkiAlexander 174
CranKy Ducklings162
Reynor123
BRAT_OK 59
SpeCial33
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena14221
Hui .612
Fuzer 357
Rex 263
JimRising 257
Reynor 123
ProTech65
BRAT_OK 59
SpeCial 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 8592
Nal_rA 2255
Shuttle 2112
BeSt 1376
Bisu 1274
EffOrt 528
Barracks 485
Larva 433
Stork 406
actioN 321
[ Show more ]
Mini 207
Hyun 182
Snow 179
ggaemo 160
Soma 150
TY 149
Soulkey 127
ZerO 78
JulyZerg 70
Rush 53
Sharp 50
Backho 42
Dewaltoss 40
sorry 31
sSak 28
Icarus 18
Shinee 15
Sacsri 13
soO 11
JYJ10
Terrorterran 2
Stormgate
BeoMulf24
Dota 2
Gorgc3100
XcaliburYe228
KheZu6
Counter-Strike
fl0m1092
sgares163
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor110
Other Games
gofns6173
singsing2030
B2W.Neo1068
Beastyqt792
QueenE81
ArmadaUGS74
KnowMe40
ZerO(Twitch)12
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV446
League of Legends
• Nemesis3697
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 50m
CranKy Ducklings
21h 50m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 1h
CSO Cup
1d 3h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 5h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 20h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.