| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On August 03 2011 08:58 Curu wrote: Here's a daunting task for you redFF. Do a full meta analysis of Kenpachi. I guarantee you its not worth the effort. + Show Spoiler + Lynch him. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 03 2011 08:08 Kenpachi wrote: -bows- hello my friends I am Kenpachi. can i claim Townie? DrH stop calling for me to appear when the thread was dead. I head to work to see 5 new pages and you constantly going "where is bc, where is bc, check bc" The more you do this the more likely you are to be scum. Also, lynch kenpachi, there are no green roles in the game, as he just claimed green, hes a liar. LAL works for day 1 right? | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 03 2011 09:45 DoctorHelvetica wrote: i said it like twice you were absent for much more than that lol you haven't weighed in on either of the two main lynch candidates and all the shit that has been flying around don't try to turn this around on me you said I was absent twice in a very short period of time in which up till that point the thread had been insanely dead. Don't call people out and expect immediate response, let alone doing it twice. Given the level of inactivity I'm for offing kenpachi for generally being useless or RL unless someone throws up compelling analysis on either target. I would be far more likely to jump at drazerk who has been mia since accusing someone and attempting to start a bandwagon. But as of now there is a selection of bad choices. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On August 03 2011 03:23 Varpulis wrote: I got called out for wishy washiness in PTP (day 1) as well. Day 1 nothing is solid, there's rarely anything to base arguments off of until late in the day, and I'm usually focused on proving my activity, not calling people scum. I haven't taken a stance because I don't have a really strong feeling about anybody yet. By the way, if we're going ahead with the plan, could we have a soldier/sniper claim? If there are none we need to reevaluate. The underlined part seems to have been ignored. The purpose of that request was to check if the plan was even possible. If we don't have the role to do it, we shouldn't bother discussing it. Also I forgot a cardinal rule of mafia: Never change your mind. Seriously guys, having second thoughts and changing an opinion based off of new evidence/convincing arguments isn't a scumtell. My FoS on Trotske still stands. He had a comment earlier that didn't sit well with me, and his more recent stuff isn't much better. | ||
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On August 03 2011 09:52 BloodyC0bbler wrote: you said I was absent twice in a very short period of time in which up till that point the thread had been insanely dead. Don't call people out and expect immediate response, let alone doing it twice. Given the level of inactivity I'm for offing kenpachi for generally being useless or RL unless someone throws up compelling analysis on either target. I would be far more likely to jump at drazerk who has been mia since accusing someone and attempting to start a bandwagon. But as of now there is a selection of bad choices. Do you mind elaborating on how these these targets are bad ._. (Although I do agree on Drazerk) | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 03 2011 10:18 OriginalName wrote: Do you mind elaborating on how these these targets are bad ._. (Although I do agree on Drazerk) Its day 1, they are slightly more active than most people, and when a lot of analysis is based off irc arguments or logic pertaining to a plan anyone could have issues with then its meh. If they are red there is not enough information to solidly lynch them for. I would honestly prefer aiming for someone who tried to start a bandwagon then vanished. Offing active people (even if they end up red) isn't the best play day 1. Offing suspect people who aren't even attempting to help or at the very least defend their selves is a far better day 1 lynch choice. | ||
|
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
IRC is inactive as fuck, Kenpachi is in this game. This shit has to stop. Everyone read all of Varpulis's and Lucidity's posts and take a stance on their lynch. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
I would rather lynch someone appearing scummy / useless than someone who is being linked as scummy and is active. Their activity will help clear / damn them whereas inactivity doesn't give us dick all to work with. | ||
|
Sevryn
698 Posts
| ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On August 03 2011 11:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote: At the moment I am not feeling either Varp lynch or the lucidity lynch. Factor in both at the moment are being more active than most players in the game, I would be more inclined to at least let them live another cycle. I however don't like when players come in to hop on bandwagons or attempt to start them then vanish. It irks me completely. As such, until Drazerk comes back into the thread to at least play / explain his inactivity I suggest we move our lynch to him. I would rather lynch someone appearing scummy / useless than someone who is being linked as scummy and is active. Their activity will help clear / damn them whereas inactivity doesn't give us dick all to work with. I support this statement, with a slight exception. I don't like the way Varpulis is looking so far, and I would be okay with voting/lynching him. Drazerk is interesting though, and I'll consider placing my vote on him instead of Varp. Lurking is extremely scummy, especially after attempting to instigate a bandwagon on someone. I don't like the Lucidity wagon at all. Something about it just feels off to me, and I feel that Lucid has been playing pro-town, sharing thoughts and developing logical reads. | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story. still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries. | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate? | ||
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On August 03 2011 12:42 JeeJee wrote: actually screw it let's get the ball rolling. anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate? Not here, my only complaint is really lack of evidence, although our current amount is quite damning if i do say so. | ||
|
ghrur
United States3786 Posts
On August 03 2011 12:42 JeeJee wrote: actually screw it let's get the ball rolling. anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate? Yeah, I do. I played with Drazerk AA and he acted the same way. If I recall, it was basically a "Lynch Wiggles" post and then afk. I'm down for either varpulis or Kenpachi. I don't get why sandroba's supposed to have seemed town. I mean, looking back on the plan, I realize it's incredibly bad. and this post by sandroba docH, how is the simple fact that it's no longer day1 is going to make lynches more acurate down the line? If we can speed up the process and basically skip night 1 how is it possibly bad for town? What? He knows better than this. So the plan basically becomes let's out the dayvig and give mafia a free blue. :/ | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Lucidity
South Africa603 Posts
Someone who is also bugging me is Curu. In AA he was a very aggressive scum hunter. In here he has only commented on the plan and made some jokes. | ||
|
Lucidity
South Africa603 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Gerald vs herO
Clem vs Cure
ByuN vs Solar
Rogue vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs TBD
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
Escore
RSL Revival
Replay Cast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Universe Titan Cup
Rogue vs Percival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
