|
My being italian and my knowledge of latin would lead me to think it would form:
Bruto or Brutato
|
[strike]f5 f5 f5 f5 f5[/strike]
Wait... I have a mac
Apple+R,Apple+R,Apple+R,Apple+R,Apple+R
|
Wait a minute.. YOU'RE DEAD
IM GETTING LATIN ADVICE FROM A ZOMBIE
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHH
|
On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc.
You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p
|
That's nothing, I learned calculus from a werewolf.
|
ZOMBIFICATUS EST!!!
OMNIS MORITURATI SUNT!!
|
![[image loading]](http://www.theanalogdept.com/images/spp6_pics/Watches/Seiko/SKZ211K1/DSC_5290.jpg)
This is what my watch looked like more than 2 hours ago.
Now it's way darker and i'm way tired.
Also, I'm simply spamming right now. Need to stop.
|
On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p
Why are we quoting dead figures of a dead empire?
|
On March 31 2011 11:28 CubEdIn wrote:This is what my watch looked like more than 2 hours ago. Now it's way darker and i'm way tired. Also, I'm simply spamming right now. Need to stop.
Really, we all are.
|
On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p
Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi
|
On March 31 2011 11:28 Tackster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi
Yeah, but that one does.
|
On March 31 2011 11:28 Tackster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi
Correct. Tackster, for example, in the original latin actually means 'little girls.' the correct version of his name, in the nomitive singular, would be 'tacksto'.
|
On March 31 2011 11:29 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:28 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi Yeah, but that one does.
Touché as the gauls would say
Fuck it, i'm dead so i edited
|
On March 31 2011 11:29 tnkted wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:28 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi Correct. Tackster, for example, in the original latin actually means 'little girls.' the correct version of his name, in the nomitive singular, would be 'tacksto'.
Rofl. Are you sure it doesn't mean "one who peed himself" or something like that?
|
On March 31 2011 11:30 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:29 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:28 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi Correct. Tackster, for example, in the original latin actually means 'little girls.' the correct version of his name, in the nomitive singular, would be 'tacksto'. Rofl. Are you sure it doesn't mean "one who peed himself" or something like that?
You spying on me?
|
On March 31 2011 11:30 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2011 11:29 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:28 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On March 31 2011 11:24 tnkted wrote:On March 31 2011 11:22 Tackster wrote:On March 31 2011 11:20 tnkted wrote:
Isn't brutUS plural? I'd be speaking to a group of people.
I do arabic and spanish. Brutus is singular - it's a name so doesn't follow a proper declension anyway. Also it's in the vocative which means 'O Brutus' In the Nominative (Brutus) it would mean Brutus did something and you... so it'd be... brutoi? Surely latin lets you turn names into verbs if you claim artistic license. Bushism, Monroe'd, etc. You misquoted anyways, it's "Et tu, Brute?" which is the proper Vocative form. Also, it's second declension masculine, follows the rules. :p Names don't always follow the rules. Just fyi Correct. Tackster, for example, in the original latin actually means 'little girls.' the correct version of his name, in the nomitive singular, would be 'tacksto'. Rofl. Are you sure it doesn't mean "one who peed himself" or something like that?
Nope that would be translated roughly as 'Kitamin', although his name is actually greek instead of latin.
|
It's lonely here on the cop team. We're using the CCTV to the best of our abilities.
|
oh dang! that was a great place for annul joke.
oh well. HURRY UP MODS
|
Knowing my luck, as I'm leaving right now, the post will happen in about five minutes.
|
So if they shot the tyres off the bus would it still make it al the way to Jackals house...
Hmmm...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
