EPTOn December 12 2010 13:32 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
malongo you hater!
malongo you hater!You know i love you bro </3
TL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Gabriel
149 Posts
You know i love you bro </3 | ||
|
Brocket
Australia192 Posts
He was a pikachu who acted like mafia. Why would you even do that? Gah. The mafia know who's on their team right? You're the reason why we can't have nice things Kenpachi. He was a pikachu who made out to be mafia by mafia who knew he's always acted suss consistently in every game. I am so disappoint. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On December 12 2010 14:44 chaoser wrote: Guys...for everyone who played Salem...that's just how he plays -_- he was playing the exact same way he did in Salem, if he was mafia there would have been slight differences -_-. No comment. He played almost the same in insane as well... can we just lynch zeks or Gabriel now? | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
| ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
DCLXVI
United States729 Posts
On December 12 2010 14:44 chaoser wrote: Guys...for everyone who played Salem...that's just how he plays -_- he was playing the exact same way he did in Salem, if he was mafia there would have been slight differences -_-. No comment. I did my best, I have no regrets Seriously though, I do not regret voting Kenpachi. He was distracting the thread from focusing on possible scum and was posting no relevant information. This does not help the town at all, and we were lucky that he was not a blue. Just because he normally acts scummy does not give him the right to post scummy. It would have been so easy for him to hide behind your terrible defense of him if he was mafia, and we cannot allow that to happen. @Meepak - Why do you want to vote for zeks or gabriel? Do you suspect mafia bandwagoned Kenpachi to save a teammate? Which one of them do you suspect more and why? Please answer these sorts of questions instead of posting accusatory one liners all the time. I was ready to write up a nice long post about the different people who defended kenpachi, but now that he has flipped green I need to rethink my arguments. Sorry for the lack of activity recently, let me sleep and in the morning I'll start pointing some fingers.  | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
Gabriel
149 Posts
Rolecheck list: + Show Spoiler + Eiii DCLXVI Hesmyrr Protection list: + Show Spoiler + node d3_crescentia jcarlsoniv Voltorb list: + Show Spoiler + tree.hugger dimnsab deconduo | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
On December 12 2010 15:28 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I wouldn't not post those analysis. If I was mafia and I saw a bad lynch coming I would try to defend it to appear in a better light. Particularly those who defended him but did not offer a better candidate. a.k.a. voting behaviour check (or maybe it is just D1 analysis, I don't know). Good recommendation though; people should be looking over both bandwagons and not focusing on single one related to your suspect. Case in point being Kenpachi I guess. | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
On December 12 2010 15:33 Gabriel wrote: What is done, is done. Right now the best for us is Gabriel's random lists (absolutely random and out of nowhere). Rolecheck list: + Show Spoiler + Eiii DCLXVI Hesmyrr Protection list: + Show Spoiler + node d3_crescentia jcarlsoniv Voltorb list: + Show Spoiler + tree.hugger dimnsab deconduo Okay, I do have to address before I go away. What is purpose of randomizing either of three actions again, when good PR can yield better results by intelligent decision making? Also wtf are you producing random results when you can simply tell the PR to use RNG to determine their results, which is FAR better method than using this "random" result of yours. | ||
|
Gabriel
149 Posts
On December 10 2010 16:02 Eiii wrote: Honestly, gabe's play has been distracting and inconsistent at best and scummy at worse. I mean, look at this: He goes from saying "We're not going to be able to analyze anyone day 1, let's just lynch an inactive and hope it removes some dead weight" to... Trying really really hard to paint ken as scum. And he doesn't even have any decent basis for it! One quote is a throwaway reaction to the day 1 post, one quote is asking about rules of the game, and the rest are useless but harmless posts. Like I said before, if he had taken even a second to look at ken's play in salem he would have seen that ken spammed like crazy even though he was medic. He might be active but he's certainly not helpful, and I think he knows it. Personally, I *do* think good analysis can be done day one. My vote's with gabe for now. On December 11 2010 23:58 Node wrote: As weird as Gabriel's play is -- I still highly doubt that he's mafia, there's no way scum would draw so much attention to themselves -- I agree completely with his analysis of zeks. I'm still curious about the "infun slip ups" line, which has yet to be clarified. Also, I think the "stop overreacting" and "don't go apeshit" lines were excellent catches, as they were put down after zeks deflected pressure. For those who don't know, a classic scumtell is defending oneself and acting guilty when there aren't people attacking you. Scum, after all, has something to be guilty about while townies do not. I'd also like to draw everybody's attention to Eiii, who has been posting in an incredibly scummy fashion. What, exactly, are these supposed to contribute? They do absolutely nothing as far as actually refuting gabriel's arguments, but instead continue to pile shit on him by calling his posts bad. It does zero for the actual discussion at hand. To me, it screams scum attempting to deflect a lynch. For now, I'm going to be putting my vote on zeks. If he turns up scum, I think we have been given excellent candidates for the lynch on day 2. On December 12 2010 11:19 Eiii wrote: Alright, so as much as I don't like his posts gabriel seems to pretty clearly be a townie at this point. Looks like actual discussion makes him put out decent content instead of just blindly lashing out, so hopefully that keeps up :D I'm switching my vote to ken. He's already been analyzed to death, but what I really don't like is this: Zero response to DC's attacks, just semi-claims to be blue to avoid a lynch. Obviously he takes it back a post later, but I just can't get over how disruptive a move this is. You are so mafia it hurts my eyes sir. Last voter on Kenpachi too. To put it in a few words: 1 Eiii puts the pressure on Gabriel to justify a badwagon. Note that he states clearly that my reasoning for calling KENPACHI OUT is wrong based. 2 Just as Node describes: when I post about lynching zeks and why he is the best behavior lynch he comes out with two rather personal attack posts (and he didnt even cared to read about zeks analysis). Another thing to note: dodging Nodes call out. Not even a word. Period. 3 Three posts later im the cleanest guy in the town. Throw me a bone here please. 4 Remember point 1? lol now Kenpachis analysis is good (after it came from tree.hugger). Now im asking anyone to re read the actual case from treehugger and get the name of all those quotes inside his post calling Kenpachi (hint: they are mine). Can you actually explain how you pass from "(Gabriel is) Trying really really hard to paint ken as scum. And he doesn't even have any decent basis for it!" to "I'm switching my vote to ken. He's already been analyzed to death" (by Gabriel and tree.hugger mostly)? And how you pass from: "...gabes posts are so blatantly bad I'm actually starting to have a hard time believing they could possibly be authored by scum. o_O" + "holy shit: Gabriel Mafia: The game where it doesn't matter that your arguments are logically consistent, or that they're accurate, or even that they make any sense at all! As long as you have a long post to make so it looks like you're trying really really hard, congrats! You're absolved of potentially being mafia. Next suspect!" to "Alright, so as much as I don't like his posts gabriel seems to pretty clearly be a townie at this point. Looks like actual discussion makes him put out decent content instead of just blindly lashing out, so hopefully that keeps up :D Im calling you out sir. Right here, right now. | ||
|
Gabriel
149 Posts
On December 12 2010 15:37 Hesmyrr wrote: Okay, I do have to address before I go away. What is purpose of randomizing either of three actions again, when good PR can yield better results by intelligent decision making? Also wtf are you producing random results when you can simply tell the PR to use RNG to determine their results, which is FAR better method than using this "random" result of yours. You dont really believe me when i say they are random do you? fear of a rolecheck maybe? Just let it go Hesmyr. | ||
|
Brocket
Australia192 Posts
Mafia please kill him or me. Kthx. | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
| ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
1) We all knew Kenpachi was most likely town, just posting scummy because that's how he usually is. 2) zeks was definitely a better option. Still think he has a good chance of being mafia. 3) We lynch Kenpachi? ...Consider me confused. People to look at imo: zeks Eiii Brocket LSB DCLXVI Insanious tree.hugger | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
| ||
|
Brocket
Australia192 Posts
Feel free to look at what I've said. I've mostly just been looking at what people have been saying and then briefly looked at 'analyses' of what people said if you want to save yourself some time. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
This may be WIFORM. But I don't believe that the Mafia would support the Gabriel lynch when Kenpachi works so well. Mafia day one would want to defend a Townie, but get the Townie lynched, so they look better. Kenpachi would fit that role. All the Mafia would have to do is subtly defend him, but allow him to become lynched. I'm not saying that everyone who defended Kenpachi is mafia. I'm saying its pretty likely that the people attacking Gabriel were mostly green | ||
| ||
I (and I'm sure lots of other newer players) have no clue what that *means* though, especially when we can't PM each other. (That might turn out to be more of a blessing than a curse though.)
