last game i played with him he was also suspected quite a lot, but he was in fact town. not that he's above suspicion, just take ur feelings towards him with a pinch of salt.
Pick Your Power Mafia 2! - Page 33
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
last game i played with him he was also suspected quite a lot, but he was in fact town. not that he's above suspicion, just take ur feelings towards him with a pinch of salt. | ||
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On August 26 2010 09:28 Subversion wrote: shame, pandain always has suspicion thrown on him. last game i played with him he was also suspected quite a lot, but he was in fact town. not that he's above suspicion, just take ur feelings towards him with a pinch of salt. This is good to know. I haven't really played a game with him before, so it's important to get the perspective of people who have. | ||
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On August 26 2010 09:24 Radfield wrote: The reason we felt it was important to put CV in that list of roles pick #4 should go for, is the possibility of a mafia at pick #1. If Mafia get pick #1, they can let the CV role slip down to another mafia at a lower pick. All of a sudden mafia KP gets doubled, and we have no idea who has the CompVig Role. By having Pick #4 randomize between the first 3 picks, it made it more risky for the mafia to employ this strategy. Siniquity raises a good point, Hesmyrr is more likely to be the traitor given that he has much better cover. Both pick #2 and pick #3 run a decent chance of getting immediately caught by pick #4. Hesmyrr also has his history of being very against a traitor role, which also adds to his cover. He's a strong player though, and a loss to the town if he flips green. Also, we should give suggestions to the SK on who he should hit. SK should be playing pro-town right now, and should be eliminating shady characters, or inactive players. You're missing my point. I'm not blaming you or anyone for putting the CV as the 4th pick. The CV draft chance should rightfully be there due to the exact reason you mentioned. My post above was based specifically on Hesmyrr's scenario; More of an "If I were him, how I would think" scenario. We all know Hesmyrr is not likely to be Mafia, or else he'll just be suicidal. Keep in mind, I'm not denying the chances of Hesmyrr of being Traitor at all. The post above is simply explaining why I asked the question hours ago. | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
Bad Santa gives extra KP of totaling up to 5 while PoD just adds a night cycle. We should lynch whoever was supposed to of taken Bad Santa if we are hitting the top 5, and not hitting the comp vig. Atleast if we aren't taking Hesmyrr, or Zeks out. That would be the best solution. I think Radfields idea to hit PoD is kind of...a bad choice. Ace, if PoD uses his ability night one, does it make it night two, or just double night cycles? Like, Night one (use it), Night One 2.0, then Day 2, or does Day 2 just get skipped altogether. I find this important in reference to the Comp Vig's operation. | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
On August 26 2010 09:28 Subversion wrote: shame, pandain always has suspicion thrown on him. last game i played with him he was also suspected quite a lot, but he was in fact town. not that he's above suspicion, just take ur feelings towards him with a pinch of salt. To be fair, he was not town, he was ninja (3rd party role). He was just playing more town-aligned. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On August 26 2010 10:07 BrownBear wrote: To be fair, he was not town, he was ninja (3rd party role). He was just playing more town-aligned. You can also go a game back when he was Miller | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On August 26 2010 09:46 ~OpZ~ wrote: Ace, if PoD uses his ability night one, does it make it night two, or just double night cycles? Like, Night one (use it), Night One 2.0, then Day 2, or does Day 2 just get skipped altogether. I find this important in reference to the Comp Vig's operation. Goes from Night 1-> (Day 2) -> Night 2 Basically what happens is: 1.)All Night Actions on Night 1 go through 2.)Day 2 goes on where I'll update everything that happened Night 1. So you'll all see whoever died on Night 1 in a post, and all roles that need to get information from Night 1 like investigative roles will be updated. 3.)There won't be any voting, and I'll go right into Night 2. 4.)Next Day will be Day 3, as Day 2 was "skipped" as I only posted it to update everyone on the current state of the game. Hope that answers it ^_^ | ||
citi.zen
2509 Posts
On August 26 2010 09:45 Fishball wrote: You're missing my point. I'm not blaming you or anyone for putting the CV as the 4th pick. The CV draft chance should rightfully be there due to the exact reason you mentioned. My post above was based specifically on Hesmyrr's scenario; More of an "If I were him, how I would think" scenario. We all know Hesmyrr is not likely to be Mafia, or else he'll just be suicidal. Keep in mind, I'm not denying the chances of Hesmyrr of being Traitor at all. The post above is simply explaining why I asked the question hours ago. I've been thinking about this as well: ex-ante it makes perfect sense for the #4 pick to promise they will choose one of the 3 roles ahead of them, as a deterrent; however, expecting this to work, when it comes time to actually choose, the #4 pick would in fact have a very low chance to "catch a liar" - much lower than 33% since most likely the top 3 spots did not lie (especially not the CV). So why not choose a different role altogether! If he chose traitor it is a bit disappointing, but hey... it is what it is. I just hope other people took the strong investigative roles, otherwise we're in for a slaughter. | ||
citi.zen
2509 Posts
On August 26 2010 10:08 zeks wrote: You can also go a game back when he was Miller That game he was the miller from hell. In general he is a bit like Bill M and naturally fits Ace's description of "obvious scum to the point of destroying the entire game (the easiest to lynch but the hardest to find a trail after they die)". | ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On August 26 2010 10:20 citi.zen wrote: That game he was the miller from hell. In general he is a bit like Bill M and naturally fits Ace's description of "obvious scum to the point of destroying the entire game (the easiest to lynch but the hardest to find a trail after they die)". "Hey Pandain, you don't have to respond, but I just wanted to say you played a great red game. Talk to me after the game. I don't know how much of a role you played behind the scenes but you were textbook red..." n.n | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On August 26 2010 10:21 Pandain wrote: "Hey Pandain, you don't have to respond, but I just wanted to say you played a great red game. Talk to me after the game. I don't know how much of a role you played behind the scenes but you were textbook red..." n.n well if it helps i felt you played bad either way | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
to be frank, being told to pick a role just to confirm others have picked it probably doesn't sound like too great of an idea. i can see a "fuck that i'm going traitor" reaction following that | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
what happens if someone gets majority before i get voted? do i need a vote placeholder while im still thinking? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
From the evidence/analysis presented | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
| ||
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On August 26 2010 11:03 Subversion wrote: oh ok good what happens if someone gets majority before i get voted? do i need a vote placeholder while im still thinking? if you read the thread! it says that after majority is hit, twilight will take up the remainder of the day so i guess you'd just have to cast a meaningless vote, which is kinda silly and doesnt make you look very good but i suppose that's what would go down i imagine people will do their best to hold off on majority so meaningful discussion can continue for as long as possible about the lynch candidates etc | ||
| ||