|
On October 01 2013 02:30 strongandbig wrote: Ok so the obvious question here is how long until cat-astrophe mafia :3 ?
Me and GM have discussed some of it, just waiting for a good time to actually plan it. The post you see above is going to be pretty accurate as to what the game will be like.
|
|
On October 01 2013 02:49 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On September 24 2013 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: ##Button ##Button ##Button ##Button ##Button I wouldn't do that if I were you
it is possible he did not do that
On September 24 2013 14:02 gonzaw wrote: ##Bus Drive: [##Button] [##Bus Drive]
considering the above gonzaw post it is possible rayns actions were rejected as ill formed operators. I suspect the actions outcome might thus well be SYNTAX ERROR: ?REDO FROM START
wouldn't want to bet on that being so thus I still think 'do that' might not be a good idea anyway.
edit: Actually I have reconsidered this in the light of the old Godel Incompleteness Theorem. At least one post in this thread must be: SYNTAX ERROR: ?REDO FROM START
|
OUT OF CHEESE ERROR: REDO FROM START
|
|
Is there a Haunted Mafia planned?
|
I know alot of the mafiaplayers here on TL have played/plays on other forums as well. What are your experiences from these forums? Care to give a review (including your view on: skill of playerbase, speed of games, availability of games, how the games are moded, general attitude of players)?
|
Games on mafiascum are completely imbalanced setup-wise, the players are bad, phases are way too long, hosts are bad, and the general attitude of players is also bad.
The only upsides are that it's super easy to win without effort, and that there's always games to sign up for.
tl;dr: only play on ms if you like having brain cancer
|
On October 10 2013 01:09 Tunkeg wrote: I know alot of the mafiaplayers here on TL have played/plays on other forums as well. What are your experiences from these forums? Care to give a review (including your view on: skill of playerbase, speed of games, availability of games, how the games are moded, general attitude of players)?
Played on Vendetta Strada. Many players are really good (and have played mafia for ~8+ years) but too inactive to play well. All in all kinda inactive, games are usually ~500-1000 posts, best active games ~1500-2000 (although pretty much all games are off thread comm). Would need more people there, because now we have like ~10 active and ~5 semi-active players, hard to play games with such a low number of players. Game speed usually normal 48/24 with 24h N0 (no actions).
Overall all of the people there are really cool and funny! I always love to play there and the overall activity of the games / in general is the only issue.
|
|
On October 10 2013 01:21 Dandel Ion wrote: Games on mafiascum are completely imbalanced setup-wise, the players are bad, phases are way too long, hosts are bad, and the general attitude of players is also bad.
The only upsides are that it's super easy to win without effort, and that there's always games to sign up for.
tl;dr: only play on ms if you like having brain cancer
i played a few games on ms. dandel is completely wrong about everything. a big difference is the games are WAY slower (better if you have a busier life). Days are usually 2 weeks long. MS is a site designed for playing mafia, so the filtering system is the best out of any mafia site. Some people there are VERY good. Scum winrates in the 90s good. Plus there are girls!
On the other side of the spectrum there is 2p2, where the recent mafia champions game was played. They usually have very quick games. The day ends every night and starts every morning. There is much less of an emphasis on making "cases." Instead people use tone, levels, game mechanics (seers, which are dts, and seer peeks) and connection theories. And the filter system there is non existent so that's pretty terrible.
|
On October 10 2013 23:41 strongandbig wrote: I hate pm games. Me too tbh. Games usually end up into everyone claiming to each other at some point (most of the games are BYOR's) yet towns somehow manages to lose a majority of the games, while with massclaiming town should easily win.
|
On October 04 2013 03:10 strongandbig wrote: OUT OF CHEESE ERROR: REDO FROM START
This makes me a happy person. I haven't read those books in far too long.
I can confirm Dan is right about MS.
|
So I talking some mafia with Foolishness recently, and remembered this little gem from one of my past games.
A lot of newer players don't fully understand what we mean when we invoke the name of Chezinu. This is a story which should give some players a better idea.
I got a message from Chezinu one day. This is his request.
If I get elected as mayor Day 1, I would like permission to be replaced by Unizehc. Will you allow this?
So my next step was to ask why. His immediate response was (note: I recieved this PM from Unizehc):
Chezinu is the insane and Unizehc is the sane one. If mayor, Unizehc must emerge and Chezinu must cease. For there is sanity within Chezinu and that sanity is me, Unizehc.
So in all of your future games, let the spirit of Chezinu and Unizehc guide you.
|
What would you call a vote system where most votes wins but everyone who gets they many votes is also lynched?
Like: OO - 3 WoS - 3 VE - 3 BH - 1
And OO WoS and VE all get lynched.
|
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 22 2013 14:14 ObviousOne wrote: What would you call a vote system where most votes wins but everyone who gets they many votes is also lynched?
Like: OO - 3 WoS - 3 VE - 3 BH - 1
And OO WoS and VE all get lynched.
I guess technically that would be plurality lynch with draw-multiple-lynching.
Oh the shenannies that would be possible
|
town favoured, and likely game-breakingly so.
Consider the possibility of lynching like 5 people with 2 votes each in a single day. If you can find a handful of confirmed town then you lynch everyone else all at once and just win. Obviously you'll have to find some way to deal with shenanigans, but if someone messes with a plan which guarantees a town win that pretty much confirms their alignment...
I haven't analysed it thoroughly but pretty sure it's massively town-favoured if abused properly.
|
On October 22 2013 17:45 Aquanim wrote: town favoured, and likely game-breakingly so.
Consider the possibility of lynching like 5 people with 2 votes each in a single day. If you can find a handful of confirmed town then you lynch everyone else all at once and just win. Obviously you'll have to find some way to deal with shenanigans, but if someone messes with a plan which guarantees a town win that pretty much confirms their alignment...
I haven't analysed it thoroughly but pretty sure it's massively town-favoured if abused properly. All vanilla game. Multiple-draw plurality lynch Mafia KP = remaining town / 3 rounded down minimum 1 Someone make this happen 16 players No replacements 4v12 I'd hit that
|
Maybe /4 would be more better
|
|
|
|