|
On July 02 2010 03:48 Korynne wrote:
Oh also, voting for ElyAs in the other thread because he's still inactive.
On July 02 2010 01:22 Korynne wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 01:15 ElyAs wrote:On July 02 2010 01:02 youngminii wrote:
So if a DT checks someone that gets recruited on the same night, it's pretty much a wasted check?
:O
Detective
You have the ability to make night investigations. Once per night, starting on Night 2, you may ask for the role of any player. I will PM you the results at the end of the night (the results will reflect that night’s recruitment).
No, the DT will see mafia so it's not wasted. I don't agree with your plan Korynne, but only on the DT check. I think we have more than one DT and if they both check the guy we've voted for, we lose in efficiency. The godfather will try to blend in the town so if he is a good player it's gonna be quite hard to find him on scumtells. That is why I want to defend a DT check plan like the one I proposed earlier. It seems random, but it maximises the efficiency of our DTs. You bring up a valid point. I think if a dream catcher gets DT, he should check whomever he wants until the first DT dies. Same with dream catcher getting jailkeeper. But I think he shouldn't roleblock randomly because that screws up the lynch thing. I don't think we'll get two DTs from the start... The thing is, we want to be able to know for sure if someone isn't GF, so we move on to lesser suspects. So I think that might be more important than making sure DTs don't overlap. Otherwise we might have suspected the GF, our new system would not have the DT checking that guy, and then we'd move on with our lives as if that guy was checked and not the GF.
Sorry ? You respond to me and you say I am inactive ? What is this I don't even
On topic, I think the one proposing the plan should be checked. Most of the time it's a good way to stay under the radar. And at least if we know you are not the GF, we know you weren't trying to break the game in your favor.
So :
##GF : Korynne
|
thank god, someone else sees it
i could kiss you right now, elyas
|
she has a hyper-active sense of acting scummy
she was super squirmy last night
and now she's trying to get me killed because i suspect her
this sort of omgus tunneling is indicative of scum
|
On July 02 2010 04:14 ElyAs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 03:48 Korynne wrote:
Oh also, voting for ElyAs in the other thread because he's still inactive. Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 01:22 Korynne wrote:On July 02 2010 01:15 ElyAs wrote:On July 02 2010 01:02 youngminii wrote:
So if a DT checks someone that gets recruited on the same night, it's pretty much a wasted check?
:O
Detective
You have the ability to make night investigations. Once per night, starting on Night 2, you may ask for the role of any player. I will PM you the results at the end of the night (the results will reflect that night’s recruitment).
No, the DT will see mafia so it's not wasted. I don't agree with your plan Korynne, but only on the DT check. I think we have more than one DT and if they both check the guy we've voted for, we lose in efficiency. The godfather will try to blend in the town so if he is a good player it's gonna be quite hard to find him on scumtells. That is why I want to defend a DT check plan like the one I proposed earlier. It seems random, but it maximises the efficiency of our DTs. You bring up a valid point. I think if a dream catcher gets DT, he should check whomever he wants until the first DT dies. Same with dream catcher getting jailkeeper. But I think he shouldn't roleblock randomly because that screws up the lynch thing. I don't think we'll get two DTs from the start... The thing is, we want to be able to know for sure if someone isn't GF, so we move on to lesser suspects. So I think that might be more important than making sure DTs don't overlap. Otherwise we might have suspected the GF, our new system would not have the DT checking that guy, and then we'd move on with our lives as if that guy was checked and not the GF. Sorry ? You respond to me and you say I am inactive ? What is this I don't even On topic, I think the one proposing the plan should be checked. Most of the time it's a good way to stay under the radar. And at least if we know you are not the GF, we know you weren't trying to break the game in your favor. So : ##GF : Korynne
Yea, if we do Korynne's plan, she is the guinea pig
|
|
|
##GF : Bill Murray
##mafia : Korynne
This way we cover both players, and if indeed Korynne is godfather she wouldn't get a chance to recruit tonight.
|
On June 27 2010 03:34 DarthThienAn wrote:
If you try to recruit a Free Mason, that person will remain a townsperson (will not become mafia), and no new mafia will be recruited for that night. They will notified that the Godfather tried to recruit them that night.
You will never be notified the results of your recruitment . DTA can you please clarify/fix the italicized OP please?
On July 02 2010 02:04 lakrismamma wrote:
You have not responded to any of my accusations either.
My thread speaks volumes more than your accusations.
On July 01 2010 03:35 YellowInk wrote:
Has anyone noticed how much information Korynne has been providing us? On July 02 2010 01:28 Korynne wrote:
Oh yeah, you should explain this post btw. I forgot about it. xD This was in reply to:
On July 01 2010 03:13 Korynne wrote:
we don't want to give the godfather more information than he already knows when you had posted:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=132755¤tpage=7#133
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=132755¤tpage=7#134
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=132755¤tpage=8#144
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=132755¤tpage=8#148
which holds a wealth of information.
It was a cheap jab much like my shot on Chezinu.
On July 02 2010 04:07 Bill Murray wrote:
heavy fos on me after i made a half page post putting heavy fos on you first?
your play is trash.
On July 02 2010 04:09 Bill Murray wrote:
jeez, you're still on me?
your play is so bad.
how about you learn how to scumhunt? take notes. You're not convincing anyone like this. You may want to try a different tact.
@Korynne roleblock plan discussion:
There are really two major points of contention I have about this. First, I don't believe it is safe to assume that we have precisely one roleblocker. If we have 0 or 2, we're losing a lot of ground with this plan. I think we are in agreement on the loss of ground, we just disagree in our assumptions. The second is that if we use this plan, whenever the mafia fail to hit we are using this as a scum tell for our pseudovoted blocked guy. The mafia could have just tried to hit whomever was in jail or a vet. If we use this as significant evidence of scum, we're going to be randomly wasting our lynches whenever the mafia happens to fail to hit.
My suggestion to roleblockers is this: Choose your own roleblocks. You can follow my ideas about blocking top players if you don't feel that you have a better target. It's just like lynching inactives - it's something you do when you don't know what better to do. If there is no mafia hit on a given night, roleblock the same target again. If the target is scum, this buys the town another safety from KP. Mind you that this isn't perfect, but it is a large scum tell if you block the KP twice in a row. If there are two roleblockers, both roleblockers will think their target is scum by this plan - but even in this case it at least helps slow down the mafia KP.
@Korynne DT plan discussion:
Voting on a target and DTs aligning by this will create perfect overlap if we have multiple DTs. This is the most inefficient way to find the godfather. Here we gain no public information by directing our DTs like we do with the roleblockers, so why even bother? By all means, if you believe someone to be the godfather for any reason, post in thread so that the DTs can take it into consideration. But railroading DTs to particular targets will not help us.
My suggestion to DTs: Target whomever you like. Take all of our ideas into consideration, but also realize that if there are two DTs you want to minimize overlap with them. This is a double edged sword since suppose town strongly suggests a target for the GF, I would hate to see a single DT shy away from investigating them because they figure the other DT is obviously going to investigate. I would prefer to have DT overlap than DTs failing to investigate - I just don't want to have perfect overlap as Korynne's plan forces.
|
On July 02 2010 04:09 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 01:17 Korynne wrote:
Bill you're laughable at your accusation of me. I'm acting funny and that's in line with my scum meta? The only game I was scum was your game, where it was f11 so there was no reason to make any let's break the game plans. And I'm pretty sure everyone in that game thought I was acting just fine and normal.
The game I acted "funny" in might be the PYP where Foolishness (mafia) kept accusing me of being scum because of one thing I repeatedly say (well you can lynch me to find out since I'm vanilla and then you'll know for sure if Foolishness stole Comp Vig) that he's like omg that's so typical scum. And I was townie that game.
So like, worst argument ever. -.- jeez, you're still on me? your play is so bad.how about you learn how to scumhunt? take notes.
take notes on how to scum hunt from BM...
>_>
<_<
Overall your play reminds me of our last game TMMM where you accused someone right off the bat and continued to argue about it. Less spam than last time, but that is probably because chezinu isn't as active. In both games you tried to help the town somewhat, but only did you do so in TMMM when you were going to be lynched. However, I do not like it when you (and korynne) dismiss others arguments with one line personal attacks. That is not beneficial to the town at all.
I have no clue how Korynne plays since she was so inactive in TMMM though.
About her plan - go ahead and vote for someone to be roleblocked if you want, I just don't think that the results will be reliable enough and stalling gives the godfather more time to recruit townies, so the plan is not beneficial in my view.
I think I will place my vote on citi.zen because I want to hear more of what he says, people say he is a good player but he posts less than me - that it pretty bad
|
I am not OMGUS tunneling. I said before, your whole attitude this game is very weird in comparison to previous games with you.
DROWNING IN WIFOM
The mafia can just, like, not send in a kill.............
wifom wifom wifom wifom
jeez korynne, your play is super scummy so far.
How is that WIFOM?? If mafia doesn't choose to send in a kill then they are choosing to let the person we choose die, rather than them choosing someone to kill. I don't know about you but if I was mafia I'd rather kill who I wanted to kill than waste a night not killing anyone, then just let town lynch someone town chose the night before as scummy looking.
Losing a vet is not a big deal?????
The only person who looks like a vet is the GF. If it was down to killing someone that was 50/50 GF/vet, I'd go for it. There's other power roles in this game, I don't see the significance of vet (actually I never quite saw why vet was any good).
a random day 1 lynch might win the game for us
your plan would ruin the game for us
the fact you are pushing for a plan which draws the game out where the mafia have unlimited recruitment nights.................................... just stop now if you aren't red.
Why don't you people get it? We're dragging it on by keeping more town players, not by letting mafia slip by. If we find a mafia and roleblock him, then he will die. The only thing we're doing by using my plan is keeping more townies alive. It doesn't matter if GF recruits them that night.
Scenario 1: We RB the guy, GF recruits the guy. => one more mafia
Scenario 2: We lynch the guy, GF recruits another guy. => one less townie, one more mafia
We are doing L's plan. There is nothing else to discuss.
Oh that makes you look real town. Hey guys, we're doing this, we're not discussing, kthx.
I wasn't going to address this, even though I desired to earlier, as I wanted to "only make good posts", but since Korynne irritated me enough to take me away from attempting my goal, and i've broken it, i'll respond to this now. Korynne, though acting oddly, may not be scum. If you noticed in my post I label her as a "traitor" in all likelihood. Her acting this way might just be that she has a weird new role, so I would not want to lynch her as much as FoS on her because she is likely to be traitor, coroner, jailkeeper, roleblocker, whatever moreso than likely to be godfather as there are just simply more chances of being town than of being godfather and acting the way she is.
Still don't see how I'm acting oddly. Does anyone else agree with BM that I'm acting oddly?
mafia can recruit night 7 8 9 10 whatever korynne
just drop it.
You pointed out something obvious, how does that explain your case.
Hey BM, the sky is blue! Now just drop it!
Also I lol at the fact you somehow decided citi.zen was coroner.
Korynne,get that vote off me right now or provide an actual tell or reason for placing that vote on me in the thread.
Someone sounds a little upset. Totally unlike you in other games where you're begging people to keep you alive. And like seriously, chill. This is completely unlike you in any game. You're always chill, and now you're freaking all over the place.
Korynne is acting VERY funny this game, and in line with her scum meta. I am going to omgus her for that shifty vote with no explanation.
I'm going to say that someone is doing something, without providing reason for it, and it is in line with her scum meta, because in the only game she's scum, she totally fooled town by acting totally normal. You're the OMGUS here, not me.
i am now voting for korynne because i've had FoS on her already, and she is spazzing over it. possible blue/red. still getting the traitor vibe from her which could be explaining why she is so creeped out that i hit the nail on the head
I'm creeped out because you're acting very different this game. If other people think you're acting normal then I'll drop it. I'm under the impression that if everyone thinks you're being different you're probably different, and if everyone thinks I'm acting different then I must be acting different and not noticing it. But as far as I can tell no one has told me I'm acting weird except you. You also stated earlier you were getting other vibes from me, very convincing arguments Bill, we'll win the game on your "vibes."
I think you're the one squirming here BM, not me. You're freaking all over my votes, whereas I just voted for you and explained it wasn't even a serious thing. And I've already changed my vote today.
heavy fos on me after i made a half page post putting heavy fos on you first?
your play is trash.
Is this what you consider to be one of the reasons I'm scummy? Honestly? More support for your trash talk please.
jeez, you're still on me?
your play is so bad.
how about you learn how to scumhunt? take notes.
Oh gee, you're so great at scumhunting now aren't you? I'm sorry, the important thing in this game isn't to find the truth, but to CONVINCE people of the truth. Your reasonings being a "vibe" and OMGUS and random accusations without support doesn't help your case in any way.
maybe if you'd actually READ you would know why I did it. I provided 3 reasons. I'm going to vote for you until you can provide me with the 3 reasons I already provided for you in the thread.
Oops, looks like you'll have to keep voting for me then. I see absolutely no reason why you voted for me.
you are OMGUS tunneling
you know how bad that is?
this is a sign of really bad play, korynne, i'm not joking with you
it shows a lack of creativity in scumhunting, which indicates to me you only use half your brain.
Because putting things in bold makes them the truth. I am not OMGUS tunneling. I could care less if you were accusing me or someone else. I think you are acting weird. I already mentioned this when you were accusing A5J instead of me. Scumhunting isn't about "creativity," so keep spewing your bullshit.
Oh, and I'm totally cool with only using half my brain, normal humans only use 10% anyway.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On July 02 2010 04:14 ElyAs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 03:48 Korynne wrote:
Oh also, voting for ElyAs in the other thread because he's still inactive. Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 01:22 Korynne wrote:On July 02 2010 01:15 ElyAs wrote:On July 02 2010 01:02 youngminii wrote:
So if a DT checks someone that gets recruited on the same night, it's pretty much a wasted check?
:O
Detective
You have the ability to make night investigations. Once per night, starting on Night 2, you may ask for the role of any player. I will PM you the results at the end of the night (the results will reflect that night’s recruitment).
No, the DT will see mafia so it's not wasted. I don't agree with your plan Korynne, but only on the DT check. I think we have more than one DT and if they both check the guy we've voted for, we lose in efficiency. The godfather will try to blend in the town so if he is a good player it's gonna be quite hard to find him on scumtells. That is why I want to defend a DT check plan like the one I proposed earlier. It seems random, but it maximises the efficiency of our DTs. You bring up a valid point. I think if a dream catcher gets DT, he should check whomever he wants until the first DT dies. Same with dream catcher getting jailkeeper. But I think he shouldn't roleblock randomly because that screws up the lynch thing. I don't think we'll get two DTs from the start... The thing is, we want to be able to know for sure if someone isn't GF, so we move on to lesser suspects. So I think that might be more important than making sure DTs don't overlap. Otherwise we might have suspected the GF, our new system would not have the DT checking that guy, and then we'd move on with our lives as if that guy was checked and not the GF. Sorry ? You respond to me and you say I am inactive ? What is this I don't even On topic, I think the one proposing the plan should be checked. Most of the time it's a good way to stay under the radar. And at least if we know you are not the GF, we know you weren't trying to break the game in your favor. So : ##GF : Korynne
Oh I'm sorry, you've made 5 posts after the game started.
First one says you're in Europe now you're reading.
Second post is a bunch of non-content. No real reason to discuss the coroner until we're like, oh hey, this would be a good moment for the coroner to use his abilities, and this is why. Obviously the coroner is not retarded and is not going to use his ability night 1, so there's plenty of more important things to talk about right now.
3rd post looks okay, except you don't provide your opinion on things... You're like, hey guys, this this this, what do you guys think? Same with your second post.
4th post is okay, and I responded accordingly.
5th post you accuse me of GF.
Gee I'm sorry, 5 posts is a lot, I'm sorry for accusing you of being inactive. Especially since I'm probably the one that's posted the most so far. If you voted for me because you think I should be checked because I proposed the plan, that's fine. (But you should check a plan based on it's validity, not because of who said it, a townie can propose a shitty plan and a mafia can propose an awesome plan to gain town favour)
If that is the case, and you just want to check me out to validate my plan, then whatever, that vote's cool with me. And BM can stop bitching that he thinks someone else agrees with him.
To Yink:
I was just pointing out why we shouldn't talk. Because townies are stupid and don't do what they're told unless you spell it out for them 5 times. As I've learned in this game.
I think it's a rather safe assumption that we have at least one roleblocker. And I think it's probably safe to say there's not two. Even if there was two, it's not a big deal. I don't think we should be throwing roleblocks all over the place, because they usually screw up normal night actions. So if someone's claiming something but then oh look, it didn't happen, then a roleblocker would have to out themselves to be like, yo, he's cool, I did roleblock him.
The whole point is that we're using it as an alternative to lynching the person who we think is most scummy. So if we're not doing this plan, HE WOULD BE DEAD ANYWAY.
I don't think we would start with two DTs either, but even if we do. I think it's more important that we can confirm people as not GF. This way a detective does not need to reveal himself to confirm people. That keeps our detective hidden! If we had two DTs they'll just spend forever metagaming themselves on whether to check the obvious or someone else. So let's just make it simple, we gain one piece of information per night, guaranteed. Rather than possibly not gaining information if DT is killed.
Also like I said before, dream catchers who get DT should check people who have not been checked by the DT yet. A much more guaranteed less overlap.
DCLXVI:
CAN PEOPLE READ MY PLAN AND ACTUALLY THINK ABOUT IT FOR A MINUTE? *fumes*
Instead of lynching someone we think is mafia, we instead roleblock them. This is not stalling, this is giving townies a chance to live. Godfather keeps recruiting if we lynch people or not. So the more townies we kill the worse off we are. Gosh people. And my plan makes it so that we essentially can do up to 3 actions a day instead of 1, making us move ahead faster than the GF does. We can hunt GF, mafia, and lynch inactives at the same time!! That's efficient! That's not stalling!
Ugh people, I'm getting sick of explaining the same plan 50 times.
|
On July 02 2010 04:15 Bill Murray wrote:
thank god, someone else sees it
i could kiss you right now, elyas
He doesn't see it. He's asking to check me to validate my plan. Nice try.
|
I believe that the first thing that we need to do is find the GF. Until we do we will just be fighting a losing battle whether we are lynching townie or mafia. Your proposed plan restricts the number of people cleared from GF role to one a night + whoever gets killed. Since this game relies so heavily on us finding the GF quickly I think that DTA gave us more than one DT. If I am correct in my assumption and the DT's followed the towns suggestion then we will be checking roughly half as many people per night. This is not going to win us the game as I estimate we have 6-8 nights at most for the DT's to use their powers as long as they don't get killed or recruited. Someone can run up the numbers but I would estimate with 2 dt's they might get a total of 10-12 checks in depending on luck and how well they play.
And yes I have read your plan many times I just feel that you overlook its negative aspects and then lash out at people like me who point that out.
|
On July 02 2010 04:56 Korynne wrote:I am not OMGUS tunneling. I said before, your whole attitude this game is very weird in comparison to previous games with you. Show nested quote +DROWNING IN WIFOM
The mafia can just, like, not send in a kill.............
wifom wifom wifom wifom
jeez korynne, your play is super scummy so far. How is that WIFOM?? If mafia doesn't choose to send in a kill then they are choosing to let the person we choose die, rather than them choosing someone to kill. I don't know about you but if I was mafia I'd rather kill who I wanted to kill than waste a night not killing anyone, then just let town lynch someone town chose the night before as scummy looking. we would not be sure which cup our poison was in basically either it's them not sending it in or us making terrible assumptions the game i am scum in mafiascum on we didnt send in a kill night 1, so korynne, your play is in line with current scum-meta and is probably being influenced by someone else regardless of whether or not you ar pming someone IN the game, you could be pming ace for instance and him guiding you on "how to play scum" perhaps scum meta currently = not sending in a kill night 1 from what i've weened this is what you are advising you are scum The only person who looks like a vet is the GF. If it was down to killing someone that was 50/50 GF/vet, I'd go for it. There's other power roles in this game, I don't see the significance of vet (actually I never quite saw why vet was any good). vet is a GREAT power role to roleclaim as medic or detective, soak a mafia hit, then go LULZ im the vet. Confirmed townie especially if you breadcrumbed. some mafia
i guess you don't see that?
It's EXACTLY how Ver would do it.Show nested quote +a random day 1 lynch might win the game for us
your plan would ruin the game for us
the fact you are pushing for a plan which draws the game out where the mafia have unlimited recruitment nights.................................... just stop now if you aren't red. Why don't you people get it? We're dragging it on by keeping more town players, not by letting mafia slip by. If we find a mafia and roleblock him, then he will die. The only thing we're doing by using my plan is keeping more townies alive. It doesn't matter if GF recruits them that night. Scenario 1: We RB the guy, GF recruits the guy. => one more mafia Scenario 2: We lynch the guy, GF recruits another guy. => one less townie, one more mafia keeping more townies alive doesnt mean they wont be recruited we have a dreamcatcher to soak whatever blue role we mislynch so keep your mouths SHUT. Oh that makes you look real town. Hey guys, we're doing this, we're not discussing, kthx. Show nested quote +I wasn't going to address this, even though I desired to earlier, as I wanted to "only make good posts", but since Korynne irritated me enough to take me away from attempting my goal, and i've broken it, i'll respond to this now. Korynne, though acting oddly, may not be scum. If you noticed in my post I label her as a "traitor" in all likelihood. Her acting this way might just be that she has a weird new role, so I would not want to lynch her as much as FoS on her because she is likely to be traitor, coroner, jailkeeper, roleblocker, whatever moreso than likely to be godfather as there are just simply more chances of being town than of being godfather and acting the way she is. Still don't see how I'm acting oddly. Does anyone else agree with BM that I'm acting oddly?You pointed out something obvious, how does that explain your case. Hey BM, the sky is blue! Now just drop it! Also I lol at the fact you somehow decided citi.zen was coroner.
OK, but why do you have to spam the thread quoting 2 posts YOU DONT EVEN RESPOND TO
MAFIA GF
LYNCH HER NAO Show nested quote +Korynne,get that vote off me right now or provide an actual tell or reason for placing that vote on me in the thread. Someone sounds a little upset. Totally unlike you in other games where you're begging people to keep you alive. And like seriously, chill. This is completely unlike you in any game. You're always chill, and now you're freaking all over the place. I'm not freaking out at all, im locked into my read.I am not going to waste away my read like I did last game with YellowInk
I don't care if people don't believe me
you are a very good lynch in terms of winning for the town if you are the godfatherShow nested quote +Korynne is acting VERY funny this game, and in line with her scum meta. I am going to omgus her for that shifty vote with no explanation. I'm going to say that someone is doing something, without providing reason for it, and it is in line with her scum meta, because in the only game she's scum, she totally fooled town by acting totally normal. You're the OMGUS here, not me.
I was the mod of that game
I am very in line with how you would be acting
you are still my #1 suspect, but not worthy of a vote really because the town can't believe it.Show nested quote +i am now voting for korynne because i've had FoS on her already, and she is spazzing over it. possible blue/red. still getting the traitor vibe from her which could be explaining why she is so creeped out that i hit the nail on the head I'm creeped out because you're acting very different this game. If other people think you're acting normal then I'll drop it. I'm under the impression that if everyone thinks you're being different you're probably different, and if everyone thinks I'm acting different then I must be acting different and not noticing it. But as far as I can tell no one has told me I'm acting weird except you. You also stated earlier you were getting other vibes from me, very convincing arguments Bill, we'll win the game on your "vibes."
I am acting different because my play has gotten a lot better.
Moderating a large theme game gives you more perspective.
YOU are the one acting funny, not me sis.I think you're the one squirming here BM, not me. You're freaking all over my votes, whereas I just voted for you and explained it wasn't even a serious thing. And I've already changed my vote today.
You voted for me BEFORE you explained it. Get it straight or get out of my game.Show nested quote +heavy fos on me after i made a half page post putting heavy fos on you first?
your play is trash. Is this what you consider to be one of the reasons I'm scummy? Honestly? More support for your trash talk please. Show nested quote +jeez, you're still on me?
your play is so bad.
how about you learn how to scumhunt? take notes. Oh gee, you're so great at scumhunting now aren't you? I'm sorry, the important thing in this game isn't to find the truth, but to CONVINCE people of the truth. Your reasonings being a "vibe" and OMGUS and random accusations without support doesn't help your case in any way. Yes, I am. People just dont know to listen yet.Show nested quote +maybe if you'd actually READ you would know why I did it. I provided 3 reasons. I'm going to vote for you until you can provide me with the 3 reasons I already provided for you in the thread. Oops, looks like you'll have to keep voting for me then. I see absolutely no reason why you voted for me. Yet again, you act like you provided reasons before, when you provided them after I called you out on trying to push a mislynch because you are scum-drivenShow nested quote +you are OMGUS tunneling
you know how bad that is?
this is a sign of really bad play, korynne, i'm not joking with you
it shows a lack of creativity in scumhunting, which indicates to me you only use half your brain. Because putting things in bold makes them the truth. I am not OMGUS tunneling. I could care less if you were accusing me or someone else. I think you are acting weird. I already mentioned this when you were accusing A5J instead of me. Scumhunting isn't about "creativity," so keep spewing your bullshit. Oh, and I'm totally cool with only using half my brain, normal humans only use 10% anyway.
"keep spewing my bullshit" lol someone is mad that I have them pegged and am going to get them lynched.
your 10% is all on the same side, chick. You can use the math side, sure, but that's about it. Stay into policy, breaking the game, and trying to mask your hyper-active Godfathery play.
You all need to be with me on this one, last game I would have won for the town.
|
I don't lash out at people who point out negative aspects. I lash out at people because they're not seeing what it's in comparison to. People are like omg we're stalling or omg mafia can just choose not to kill someone at night etc. Those are not valid arguments.
Hmm... if there is more than 1 DT I cannot see any way of organizing it in the town without making things ridiculous and risky. So I'm okay ditching that idea if we feel like there's most definitely at least 2 DTs. Alternatively we can out a DT and JK him, but I don't think that's a great idea...who knows, haven't thought about that one.
|
We lose blue roles over time
Mafia do not lose goons over time
Our KP is fixed
THEIR'S ISN'T
DON'T LET HER GET TO 5 MEMBERS AND POSSIBLY 3KP
SHE IS BEING INFLUENCED BY ACE
LYNCH HER IDIOTS
|
SHES MASSING MUTAS LOL
SPARKS RUSH GOGOGO
|
|
|
On July 02 2010 05:50 Bill Murray wrote:
SHES MASSING MUTAS LOL
SPARKS RUSH GOGOGO
Well when you put it that way, she has to die 
|
Bill what happens if she flips green or blue? Do we turn against you after this crusade?
|
Nope - more on that later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
