EPTFor future reference though, banlist free games do not count for the purpose of sitting out bans.
TL Mafia Ban List - Page 135
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
For future reference though, banlist free games do not count for the purpose of sitting out bans. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Requesting a warning for Sufficiency for failing to vote the day he was lynched. Thanks! | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
| ||
|
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On March 17 2012 14:11 Coagulation wrote: can you update the list to reflect me sitting out storm mafia plz. you only credited me for BCs game.... | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
On March 24 2012 13:56 Coagulation wrote: can you update the list to reflect me sitting out storm mafia plz. you only credited me for BCs game.... And exclude MrZentor (I assume Kaller game eliminated his ban since he's currently playing). | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On March 24 2012 03:34 Curu wrote: Requesting 1 game ban for Nicolas. Replaced out for no reason, didn't even bother to try to search for his own replacement despite it being in OP. Is the ban for leaving the game without a good reason and without warning you beforehand, so basically inactivity, or for posting in the thread that he was replacing out? These things are usually discussed after the game. I´m not arguing against a ban though, replacing out without warning is a problem, and a 1-game ban sounds about right. | ||
|
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
He had no good reason (didn't want to play anymore) and didn't try to search for his own replacement either. | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
rgTheSchworz - modkilled for inactivity Abenson - inactivity, pretty obviously posting just to get around the activity requirements Warning for [UoN]Sentinel for inactivity and lackluster response after being warned. Although there are special rules against posting to just get around the activity requirements, its a borderline case so I'll leave it up to GM/fw's discretion on whether to turn that into a ban or not. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 03 2012 15:08 Incognito wrote: JubJub Mafia: Requesting bans for rgTheSchworz - modkilled for inactivity Abenson - inactivity, pretty obviously posting just to get around the activity requirements Warning for [UoN]Sentinel for inactivity and lackluster response after being warned. Although there are special rules against posting to just get around the activity requirements, its a borderline case so I'll leave it up to GM/fw's discretion on whether to turn that into a ban or not. I´m not following. Do you want Abenson to get a ban for not posting at all, or did he post the required posts but you thought it was too little? ON [UoN]nentinel, it sounds like they did the same thing, as well as ignoring a warning, but you recommend different punishments. | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
On April 04 2012 10:41 redFF wrote: You can't request bans on people if they met the activity requirements lol. This. If it isn't enough for you, change your requirements. | ||
Ver
United States2186 Posts
On February 29 2012 13:47 Protactinium wrote: Activity: You must post at least once every 24 hours and vote every day cycle. If this will conflict with your schedule please let me know beforehand so I can announce to your fellow players that you won't be there for that time period. If you are clearly trying to skirt this requirement you will get replaced, while if you are actively contributing but happen to miss for a bit, that's okay. | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
If you are clearly trying to skirt this requirement you will get replaced, while if you are actively contributing but happen to miss for a bit, that's okay. No, I'm not requesting bans for people who met the activity requirement. We couldn't find replacements, but that doesn't matter. Yes, the rule is subjective, but if the rules are objective there will always be people who just do the bare minimum to get away from a modkill. If we want to fight inactivity we need to use some common sense judgement rather than relying on straight up rules. The OP clearly states punishment for people who try to skit the requirements and both players were warned, so its not like this is out of the blue. Ban for Abenson as opposed to a warning for sentinel because Abenson's case is more clear cut. But if GM decides a ban for both is in order its up to him. For all the legalistic people who are addicted to rigid impersonal (bureaucratic) rules, Abenson posts here and doesn't post again 50 hours later, so that clearly violates the post every 24 hours rule. Sentinel posts here and doesn't post again for 30 hours, thus breaking the same rule. So ya, I can request bans for them based on a strict objective interpretation of the rules. But any sane person can see that its really dumb and to go through extensive lengths to check the exact timings of all the posts. I wouldn't be surprised if you can find other people who didn't post for 24 hours, but I'm not going to look because its just ridiculous. Subjective rules may feel uncomfortable for people, but that's why the system was changed and why GMarshal has the final say. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
I think both should get a standard inactivity ban, plain and simple. | ||
| ||
