EPTIEM Season X Katowice Group Stage - Page 53
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
| ||
|
Mikau
Netherlands1446 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:28 Skitter wrote: I mean, posting on site where people jack off to China losing is an exercise in futility as it is Or maybe people actually have a point and you jacking off to the thought of China possibly winning again ever is an exercise in futility. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:27 KissBlade wrote: Fnatic beat h2k and g2 though. So is top Europe bad too? Taking a game off of a team in a best of one is very different from losing two games out of three. | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:33 Azarkon wrote: Taking a game off of a team in a best of one is very different from losing two games out of three. Err the ratio of Fnatic wl against top Europe is literally the same as them vs QG luckerdogs today. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:32 KissBlade wrote: Also isn't QG, 3-2 or better against this Fnatic roster? And 2-2 vs them for day? So second best team in China is = fifth best team in Europe, looks right. | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:34 Azarkon wrote: So second best team in China is = fifth best team in Europe, looks right. Sure if we want to use that rubrics fifth team Europe = first anyway | ||
|
Skitter
United States899 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:32 Mikau wrote: Or maybe people actually have a point and you jacking off to the thought of China possibly winning again ever is an exercise in futility. Sorry, I wasn't responding to you How's that FNC dick tho | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9110 Posts
| ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:36 KissBlade wrote: Sure if we want to use that rubrics fifth team Europe = first anyway Fnatic is 1 for 1 against the top two European teams, but 0 for 2 against UoL. By that logic UoL > 2nd best LPL team. | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:39 Azarkon wrote: Fnatic is 1 for 1 against the top two European teams, but 0 for 2 against UoL. By that logic UoL > 2nd best LPL team. Yeah it's almost as if small sets of games as data sets for regional strength are retarded. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:40 KissBlade wrote: Yeah it's almost as if small sets of games as data sets for regional strength are retarded. Given League of Legends only has "small sets of games as data sets," that must indicate that, in fact, we can argue that LPL > LCS > LCK because hey, there are so few games they don't show shit. LPL just had a bad sample. | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
QG with Uzi is essentially their B team because they play so differently with him on the team, as he demands more resources as the ADC and force Swift into dumb ganks bot that get turned around by TP | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:42 Azarkon wrote: Given League of Legends only has "small sets of games as data sets," that must indicate that, in fact, we can argue that LPL > LCS > LCK because hey, there are so few games they don't show shit. LPL just had a bad sample. Err no because we play league and can understand when a team looks good and doesn't because you know that's just called game understanding. And btw I've always said QG looks fraud as fuck and always was just lucky during their run when lpl sacked and now made it into lpl shit group A | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:45 KissBlade wrote: Err no because we play league and can understand when a team looks good and doesn't because you know that's just called game understanding. No, you cannot, and that is why every single one of the LPL analysts, as well as the bulk of their "professional players," thought that they'd do well in worlds. I could tell you they would not and I don't even need to play League of Legends to do it. | ||
|
Mikau
Netherlands1446 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:38 Skitter wrote: Sorry, I wasn't responding to you How's that FNC dick tho Maybe, but I'm responding to you. That's the beauty of this internetforum thing. When you shitpost after your favourite region gets shown to be the shitters they are it's public. And I wouldn't know, I don't really care about Fnatic. Shouldn't you be complaining about S A N D B A G G I N G somewhere? | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:46 Azarkon wrote: No, you cannot, and that is why every single one of the LPL analysts, as well as the bulk of their "professional players," thought that they'd do well in worlds. I could tell you they would not and I don't even need to play League of Legends to do it. LOL cause you're fcking retarded and don't realize even a donkey is right twice a day. No one knew that lpl was going to be bad thanks to riot juggernaut troll patch. Lpl was by far strongest during and post MSI. You'd know that if you put one tenth the effort that you do in shit posting to learning the actual game. | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:49 Mikau wrote: Maybe, but I'm responding to you. That's the beauty of this internetforum thing. When you shitpost after your favourite region gets shown to be the shitters they are it's public. And I wouldn't know, I don't really care about Fnatic. Shouldn't you be complaining about S A N D B A G G I N G somewhere? Your first post was "I don't watch lpl". I didn't know not knowing something makes experts like you and Azarkon lol | ||
|
Skitter
United States899 Posts
They've beaten so far: EPA, WE, LGD, VG (2-1), Snake, OMG All shining examples of strength, I'm sure | ||
|
Skitter
United States899 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:49 Mikau wrote: Maybe, but I'm responding to you. That's the beauty of this internetforum thing. When you shitpost after your favourite region gets shown to be the shitters they are it's public. And I wouldn't know, I don't really care about Fnatic. Shouldn't you be complaining about S A N D B A G G I N G somewhere? Don't waste time typing, you're due for a full lobotomy | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 06 2016 07:52 Skitter wrote: I mean, anyone calling QG the second best team in LPL should be lobotomized anyways They've beaten so far: EPA, WE, LGD, VG (2-1), Snake, OMG All shining examples of strength, I'm sure Tbh current WE isn't too bad. I think WE can beat uzi QG. | ||
| ||
