EPTSay they replace and adjusted all of Sion's AP ratios on his Stun and Shield with AD ratios, would he then have potential as a viable pick since he can both QW burst and have a good auto attack?
[Patch 3.10: Yimake Patch] General Discussion - Page 28
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
silencefc
United States875 Posts
Say they replace and adjusted all of Sion's AP ratios on his Stun and Shield with AD ratios, would he then have potential as a viable pick since he can both QW burst and have a good auto attack? | ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On July 31 2013 07:11 AsmodeusXI wrote: IS IT LUCIAN OR HAS NEO BEEN TROLLED AGAIN?! Find out more in the next few pages!! FUCKING NAILED IT. Also Day 1: The Life Packing is complete. UHaul trucks make me sad. I wish they had a "Highlander" gear. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:24 silencefc wrote: Seeing how they kind of combined the strengths of AP and AD Yi by replacing all of his AP ratios with AD, imagine how this would this work for Sion. Say they replace and adjusted all of Sion's AP ratios on his Stun and Shield with AD ratios, would he then have potential as a viable pick since he can both QW burst and have a good auto attack? This would make him batshit OP imo. Great burst AND ability to auto to death AND good survivabiity (and borderline unkillable with ult on + shield) | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
| ||
|
vvSiegvv
United States364 Posts
| ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:31 UniversalSnip wrote: I'd like to see 5 or 6 a year. Twice a year but three champs each. + Show Spoiler + Yes I'm DotA'ing but the huge hype around 6.78 was actually super cool. | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:31 vvSiegvv wrote: I'm all for longer champ release cycles, however it would be nice for Riot to be a little bit clearer on when a champ was actually going to be released. For awhile we had them come out with the patch, then recently it's been a day or so after the patch when they get activated, and now it seems it's not even necessarily going to be on the same patch as when they are introduced to the client. All of which is fine, it would just be nice to know in advance or to have some kind of precedent so you knew roughly when to expect the champ. why, so you can get pissed when it gets delayed? The only reason there's even discussion over whether lucian is taking 'too long' is because there are expectations of a certain release schedule. no expectations, no issue. having a set timetable is a terrible idea, once they release a hero they can't take it back. | ||
|
UnKooL
Korea (South)1667 Posts
| ||
|
vvSiegvv
United States364 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:36 UnKooL wrote: Oh god its so much harder to harass as Ryze and not get punished when playing vs ap melee mids like fizz. Also the range indicator seems off on either his auto or his new q, because currently the q has less range than the auto according to the indicator, when q is 600 and autos are 550. Auto and spell ranges are calculated differently iirc. | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21246 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:36 UnKooL wrote: Oh god its so much harder to harass as Ryze and not get punished when playing vs ap melee mids like fizz. Also the range indicator seems off on either his auto or his new q, because currently the q has less range than the auto according to the indicator, when q is 600 and autos are 550. I'm glad Ryze is gonna drop off the radar for a bit, it was getting real stale seeing him every game z.z | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
hue | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:38 vvSiegvv wrote: No not at all lol. I'm not upset, it just seems unnecessarily complicated. I mean hell, our last 2 GD threads have been labeled as Lucian patches because it's pretty difficult to tell when something is being released given the current system. Would it not be nicer for things to be more transparent? that's what I'm saying, the answer to that is an unequivocal no. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:40 PrinceXizor wrote: Riot needs to stop generating their own hype. Asmos comment about dotas hype is right. Things are just DONE in dota. we don't get alerted of the patch until its out. Heroes just COme out with no warning. Riot tried to control and generate all their own hype, and it leaves the community pretty left out unless they follow the riot train. For instance there is no LoL channel that compares to how good DotaCinema is. there is no hype surrounding releases of patches, because its expectd that riot tells everyone whats in it beforehand, so when it comes out everyone is just thinking, yeah, thats what we had expected. wtf... | ||
|
vvSiegvv
United States364 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:06 ReketSomething wrote: Poll: Best Champion Release Period More than 5 Weeks (23) 4 Weeks (7) 5 Weeks (4) Less than 2 weeks (1) 2 Weeks (1) 3 Weeks (0) 36 total votes Your vote: Best Champion Release Period (Vote): Less than 2 weeks I still think 3 weeks is too fast. I meant 3 weeks between Balance and Champion, making the overall turnaround 6 weeks on a champion. | ||
|
Ketara
United States15065 Posts
If you want to bitch about balance I mean, whatever. But if you want to say Riot is bad at managing its community like, what? srs? | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On August 01 2013 08:46 Ketara wrote: If you want to bitch about balance I mean, whatever. But if you want to say Riot is bad at managing its community like, what? srs? I'm saying riot shouldn't be managing its community as much as it is. its hard to find an aspect of the lol community that isn't guided entirely by riot. thats bad. its bad for long term growth and its bad for the pro scene. | ||
| ||
