|
United States20661 Posts
So Obama's selected Dr. Regina Benjamin to be America's Doctor. She's done admirable work for the poor, and her efforts post-Katrina are commendable, but the S.G. is as much a figurehead as an actual health policy pusher.
And honestly? An overweight person is to dictate to a morbidly obese nation on how to take care of itself?
Hope and change grows curiouser and curiouser.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124749440449132729.html
|
this is the change that was voted for. better than the evil white man. I think that it is an interesting change to let other people handle business in the government. At the same time- obama is a chain smoker and you don't hear anything about that on the news and he is the figurehead of america lol. so really just because she is overweight i really don't think that it is a big deal.
|
i think the idea of a surgeon general is stupid.
politics is like mercury. It's lethal by itself, and mixing it with other things doesn't make it more palatable.
|
He picked her because she is Pro-Obamacare. While she has done fine work, she obviously hasn't spent much time in Canada or Britain. (But that is for another topic)
|
wait so- government funded heath care is bad thing?
why?
|
Bosnia-Herzegovina1437 Posts
|
On July 14 2009 07:24 Caller wrote: i think the idea of a surgeon general is stupid.
politics is like mercury. It's lethal by itself, and mixing it with other things doesn't make it more palatable.
Ha! Funny and so true, and yet people are so gullible time after time they seem to think Government is this omniscient force that cures all ills, when in fact its the direct cause of those ills.
How people expect the Government to provide satisfactory healthcare, but yet they can't even manage one financial institution, mail service, or their own budget. Silly times we are living in.
|
On July 14 2009 07:17 Last Romantic wrote: Hope and change grows curiouser and curiouser. I agree.
|
On July 14 2009 07:26 Misrah wrote: wait so- government funded heath care is bad thing?
why?
Very. Anyways, this isn't the topic for such a discussion.
|
Why didnt you include her name or a link to an article with her name in the OP?
|
United States20661 Posts
|
Thanks haha now to go read about her a little.
|
On July 14 2009 07:28 Aegraen wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2009 07:26 Misrah wrote: wait so- government funded heath care is bad thing?
why? Very. Anyways, this isn't the topic for such a discussion.
but why? is it the fact that the governemnt can do nothing right? or that it will cost us more? or the fact that medical visits will take longer, and now performing obscure or expernsive proceadures will not happen? or that the hospitals will simply try and treat, not prevent?
basically im just agreeing with you- i have never seen some one on TL that actually things that everything obama does is godlike lol
/end of thread derailment
|
On July 14 2009 07:17 Last Romantic wrote:
And honestly? An overweight person is to dictate to a morbidly obese nation on how to take care of itself?
I searched Google images after reading this comment. She's a little chub, but not that overweight.
The problem with the obesity issue isn't necessarily about weight, but it's about perception that people have against fat people. I don't see why we need a skinny person to carry this message.
Obviously, I don't know her position is on obesity, but imo an overweight person can deliver the message that being overweight isn't a bad thing, but very unhealthy if a person becomes obese.
There's going to be a long line that's going to make fun of her when she addresses the obesity issue, but if she can overcome this she'll be a great surgeon general. No small task of course.
|
On July 14 2009 07:39 broz0rs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2009 07:17 Last Romantic wrote:
And honestly? An overweight person is to dictate to a morbidly obese nation on how to take care of itself?
I searched Google images after reading this comment. She's a little chub, but not that overweight. The problem with the obesity issue isn't necessarily about weight, but it's about perception that people have against fat people. I don't see why we need a skinny person to carry this message. Obviously, I don't know her position is on obesity, but imo an overweight person can deliver the message that being overweight isn't a bad thing, but very unhealthy if a person becomes obese. There's going to be a long line that's going to make fun of her when she addresses the obesity issue, but if she can overcome this she'll be a great surgeon general. No small task of course.
And exactly how much does a Surgeon General actually contribute? What makes a great one, and a bad one?
One bureaucrat is like any other, a pox on us all.
Is anyone else tired of all the 'czars' and bureaucrats that are unelected that soak up our money and show nothing but waste? Can we unite and get rid of the IRS, EPA, Department of ______ Fill in the Blank, etc.
A wise and frugal government is a good government. Oh, where have I heard that one before..
|
At least he didn't pick Sanjay Gupta
|
hmm if we could rid ourselves of all government run programs life would be so much better. it has been shown time and time again that private enterprise can run things better than the government. Why does america want a social health care program so badly? there is simply no merit to it.
|
On July 14 2009 07:43 Aegraen wrote: Is anyone else tired of all the 'czars' and bureaucrats that are unelected that soak up our money and show nothing but waste? Can we unite and get rid of the IRS, EPA, Department of ______ Fill in the Blank, etc. lol. let's get rid of the department of defence. and kill the irc cuz forget taxes, the government doesn't need citizens' moneys to fund the nation. they can just keep printing new ones.
|
Obama will continue to pick blacks, women, and any other minorities and put them in important jobs during his administration. I'm really surprised he hasn't pick a gay environment advisor or something like that yet.
Not sure if it's really good or bad, but that's the "change".
In the end it all comes down to the fact that politicians can do much less for a country than most people think. Maybe I'm getting "self-important" here because I work in an financial investment fund, but I could go as far as saying the CEO of a really big fund like Blackstone or Goldman Sachs can make decisions that have far greater direct impact on the situation of a country than a president.
Presidents have a strict guideline to follow - finance CEO's can and WILL go apeshit when they decide they have a good idea to make money. (Hi there international financial crisis!)
|
United States20661 Posts
Defense is necessary. The remainder of publicly funded programmes are largely contestable.
|
|
|
|