This seems pretty important (net neutrality) - Page 2
Forum Index > General Forum |
KaasZerg
Netherlands927 Posts
| ||
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
| ||
![]()
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11568 Posts
![]() sigh... sad that in none of the videos is she there wearing barely nothing T_T | ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
| ||
![]()
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
Groslouser
France337 Posts
| ||
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
| ||
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
| ||
HamerD
United Kingdom1922 Posts
On June 11 2008 02:35 JeeJee wrote: i don't understand how someone can even remotely consider this as a possibility i mean seriously Well can you please tell me why you think that? I am interested, like I said, to see how people are not worried by this. | ||
![]()
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On June 11 2008 02:55 HamerD wrote: Well can you please tell me why you think that? I am interested, like I said, to see how people are not worried by this. Because Kevin Martin kicks ass. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
let's see what they say when lobbyists start treating washington to fancier and fancier dinners. from wikipedia: The FCC is directed by five Commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 5-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term basically my point is that the FCC is as subject to corruption as nearly every other part of our government is. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
also taken from wikipedia: Before becoming a commissioner, Martin was a Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy. He has also served as the Deputy General Counsel to Bush-Cheney 2000, on the Bush-Cheney recount team in Florida, and on the Presidential Transition. Before joining Bush-Cheney 2000, Martin served as legal advisor to FCC Commissioner Harold Furchtgott-Roth, in the Office of the Independent Counsel, and as an associate of Wiley Rein LLP. One of Wiley Rein's most important clients is Verizon ([1], [2], [3]). Upon graduation from law school, Martin served as a judicial clerk for Judge William M. Hoeveler of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Miami. i wouldn't believe a fucking word this guy says | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
Chuiu
3470 Posts
On June 11 2008 02:37 KaasZerg wrote: In the Netherlands there is a law against forming kartels/monopies that has been used agains oligargies carving up the market. Is there such a law in Canada and the U.S. and is it implemented? Yes but this wouldn't be a monopoly or kartel, this would be more like making the internet like cable or satelite television. And theres nothing illegal about that, theres just mass numbers of people against it and a small number of greedy people who can make it happen despite resistance. | ||
Ethenielle
Norway1006 Posts
| ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On June 11 2008 02:42 {88}iNcontroL wrote: she has an amazing rack. I just wish she would allow us to see them. Not very neutral of her to keep them private. LOL AND INCONTROL WINS THE THREAD AGAIN | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
Hmm the US FCC says it will intervene. You know what else the US government said it would do? Actually go through with the No Child Left Behind Act. Gee what happened there.... | ||
TrainRape
46 Posts
On June 11 2008 02:37 KaasZerg wrote: In the Netherlands there is a law against forming kartels/monopies that has been used agains oligargies carving up the market. Is there such a law in Canada and the U.S. and is it implemented? Yeah, the Sherman Antitrust Act. It is used fairly often. | ||
Kong John
Denmark1020 Posts
That guy is the biggest moron in the world! Ive never seen anyone so retarded! His douchnes completely overshines this important topic ![]() | ||
Chef
10810 Posts
![]() Completely selfish and absurd, but I have no idea how you're supposed to stop people with that much money. These people could get away with murder if they wanted to. If you think about it, these people taking away freedoms from the internet, is like when people took away land from the natives. Both are claiming rights to things they shouldn't, and both are inconsiderate and selfish. Aren't there any groups with lobbying power that would be against this? Like say game companies and other entertainment industries that benefit hugely from fansites (imagine where Blizzard's StarCraft would be without TeamLiquid, sclegacy, replay databases, mapping forums, etc). It would mean Blizzard would have to give fans their own server space to create their websites, which is not only a pain in the butt, it's expensive for Blizzard just to pay everyone's service provider to allow their sever to have fast speeds. End of the internet is right. The only sites that will get subscribers are youtube and facebook. | ||
| ||