https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/09/politics/us-iran-arms-ukraine/index.html
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 672
Forum Index > General Forum |
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. | ||
Harris1st
Germany6707 Posts
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/09/politics/us-iran-arms-ukraine/index.html | ||
Leiocritus
6 Posts
| ||
Yurie
11686 Posts
On April 13 2024 14:33 Leiocritus wrote: Not bad. But the fact that this 'support' is now a news story really shows how dire the situation has become. US keeps sending 2000 lbs pound bombs to Israel so Israel can literally bomb just children. But the US, and some countries in Europe, keep refusing to send aid to Ukraine. We in Europe need to prepare for a war with Russia. A full war. And possibly a nuclear war. And the US needs to have a deep think about when ever China invades Taiwan, and they will try eventually, why in the world Europe should give a rats ass considering the US abandoned us when Russia attacked us. The US and Europe together have a 100+ Patriot missile systems. But in years time, we only managed to send 5 systems to Ukraine. And these are just to defend civilians. It is actually pathetic. An interesting point is that the US and most other states don't consider the war in Ukraine to be more important than honoring current contracts. We have seen a large effort on artillery grenades and buying legacy systems. New production into Ukraine has been so-so. An example Perun raised was the Korean war: (34:25) where the US army complained about shortages as the US exports of weapons increased. I think an analysis after the war will find the same happened here again. | ||
Leiocritus
6 Posts
| ||
Manit0u
Poland17196 Posts
On April 13 2024 15:20 Leiocritus wrote: Even if we pressure Ukraine and give Putin all of Ukraine he wants, we still need to prepare for war with Russia. I guess people never learn? Hitler did exactly the same thing as Russia is doing now. Demanded some pieces of foreign land and all the big players around were like "sure, you can have it" to avoid going to war. We all know how it ended... | ||
ZeroByte13
744 Posts
NATO's population is 7 times higher, weapons are at least not worse and probably better, and there won't be a surpise element. USA alone Defensive war - maybe a chance, but offensive one on enemy's turf? How? They cannot advance much in Ukraine - whose army is not in a great shape after 2 years - that is merely helped by NATO's equipment. | ||
maybenexttime
Poland5441 Posts
Russia sliding further into insanity. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
maybenexttime
Poland5441 Posts
On April 13 2024 19:23 ZeroByte13 wrote: I might be wrong but I don't think anyone with actual power in Russian government actually believes they can fight with NATO in a full-scale war. NATO's population is 7 times higher, weapons are at least not worse and probably better, and there won't be a surpise element. USA alone Defensive war - maybe a chance, but offensive one on enemy's turf? How? They cannot advance much in Ukraine - whose army is not in a great shape after 2 years - that is merely helped by NATO's equipment. Both World Wars started with the aggressors thinking it would be a quick adventure, and Russia would count on the West not having the balls to respond with force to a minor incursion in a remote part of Finland or some Estonian city. The idea would be to trigger NATO to implode, not have a direct confrontation. Just because it sounds stupidly risky, doesn't mean Putin wouldn't go for it. Invading Ukraine was just as stupid. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21364 Posts
On April 13 2024 22:17 maybenexttime wrote: And the scary part is that it would even be a relatively low cost operation because Russia can sit behind the safety of knowing it will not be counter invaded, as it is a nuclear power.Both World Wars started with the aggressors thinking it would be a quick adventure, and Russia would count on the West not having the balls to respond with force to a minor incursion in a remote part of Finland or some Estonian city. The idea would be to trigger NATO to implode, not have a direct confrontation. Just because it sounds stupidly risky, doesn't mean Putin wouldn't go for it. Invading Ukraine was just as stupid. | ||
Acrofales
Spain17849 Posts
On April 13 2024 22:23 Gorsameth wrote: And the scary part is that it would even be a relatively low cost operation because Russia can sit behind the safety of knowing it will not be counter invaded, as it is a nuclear power. If Russia feels it can invade a NATO country without nukes being a possibility, things get pretty hairy. Basically means they don't believe at all that NATO will put their money where their mouth is. | ||
ZeroByte13
744 Posts
On April 13 2024 22:17 maybenexttime wrote: With Ukraine they hoped for very fast operation - and it almost worked, but in the end it didn't. And then they were stuck in it.Just because it sounds stupidly risky, doesn't mean Putin wouldn't go for it. Invading Ukraine was just as stupid. It would 100% not work with, say, Finland. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
On April 13 2024 22:17 maybenexttime wrote: Both World Wars started with the aggressors thinking it would be a quick adventure, and Russia would count on the West not having the balls to respond with force to a minor incursion in a remote part of Finland or some Estonian city. The idea would be to trigger NATO to implode, not have a direct confrontation. Just because it sounds stupidly risky, doesn't mean Putin wouldn't go for it. Invading Ukraine was just as stupid. This is the right take and the right examples. Just because it’s stupid doesn’t mean Putin won’t do it. | ||
Uldridge
Belgium4587 Posts
On April 13 2024 22:45 Acrofales wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 13 2024 22:23 Gorsameth wrote: And the scary part is that it would even be a relatively low cost operation because Russia can sit behind the safety of knowing it will not be counter invaded, as it is a nuclear power. If Russia feels it can invade a NATO country without nukes being a possibility, things get pretty hairy. Basically means they don't believe at all that NATO will put their money where their mouth is. Do I misunderstand MAD, or are nukes actually never ever actually an option, but are just a giant bluff and the risk reward being so out of proportion it's not worth calling it. Putin is then basically waging on the fact that MAD is actually just a bluff. | ||
Sent.
Poland9104 Posts
| ||
maybenexttime
Poland5441 Posts
On April 14 2024 02:44 Uldridge wrote: Do misunderstand MAD, or are nukes actually never ever actually an option, but are just a giant bluff and the risk reward being so out of proportion it's not worth calling it. Putin is then basically waging on the fact that MAD is actually just a bluff. We've gone over this a few times in this thread. There is an escalation ladder and MAD is at the very end of it. NATO and Russia/USSR have fought against each other in proxy wars and such (Korea, Vietnam or Syria, to name a few) and it didn't result in a nuclear exchange. What I had in mind was Putin possibly betting on NATO imploding due to indecision and "anti-escalatory rhetoric" before things escalated into a full-blown conventional war, let alone a MAD scenario. The goal wouldn't even be to conquer any part of NATO territory. It would be to sow division and breed resentment, with the Kremlin-sponsored 5th columns (Orban, Wilders, Le Pen, etc.) asking whether we really want to die for Narwa. It would be a gamble and it could backfire spectacularly like it did in Ukraine. Putin seems to operate on faulty data. Either because he's lost his marbles or because he's surrounded himself with yes men. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
zeo
Serbia6267 Posts
The roiling water can be treacherous, the banks are steep and slick with mud, and the riverbed is covered in jagged, hidden boulders. Yet Ukrainian border guards often find their quarry — men seeking to escape the military draft — swimming in these hazardous conditions, trying to cross the Tysa River where it forms the border with Romania. Lt. Vladyslav Tonkoshtan recently detained a man on the bank, where he was preparing to cross the river in the hope of reuniting with his wife and children, whom he had not seen in two years since they fled to another country in Europe. That thousands of Ukrainian men have chosen to risk the swim rather than face the dangers as soldiers on the eastern front highlights the challenge for President Volodymyr Zelensky as he seeks to mobilize new troops after more than two years of bruising, bloody trench warfare with Russia. With Russia having seized the initiative on the battlefield in recent months, Ukraine’s ability to defend itself hinges on replenishing its arsenal of weaponry, a matter largely up to allies, and mobilizing troops at home. But getting more men to enlist has been particularly difficult and politically fraught. After months of delays and debate, Ukraine’s Parliament on Thursday passed a law to expand the draft by eliminating some medical and other exemptions, increasing soldier pay and stiffening penalties for draft dodging. Mr. Zelensky separately signed a law lowering the draft age, to 25 from 27. Ukraine’s shortage of soldiers has become acute, generals say. In a speech in Parliament on Thursday, the commander of Ukrainian forces in the east, Gen. Yurii Sodol, said Russians in certain sections of the front outnumber Ukrainians by more than seven to one. It was among the first public assessments of the balance of forces in the east by a senior Ukrainian military commander. Ukraine, General Sodol told members of Parliament, requires one soldier for every 10 yards of trench work stretching along the 600-mile front. Many Ukrainians who rushed to volunteer in the first days of the war have fought continually since, with only two weeks of leave once a year. Soldiers are enlisted until the end of hostilities, with no defined date for release from their obligation to serve. With casualty rates high, being drafted, soldiers say, is like getting a one-way ticket to the front. As Ukraine’s battlefield prospects have sagged, draft dodging has been on the rise. In the hills and river valleys of western Ukraine’s border regions, men from elsewhere in the country have been seeking to avoid enlistment by crossing into European countries, where they seek refugee status. The Romanian authorities say more than 6,000 men have turned up on their side of the Tysa River since Russia’s invasion. Not everyone makes it. The bodies of 22 men have washed up on both banks, said Lt. Lesya Fedorova, a spokeswoman for the Mukachevo border guard unit. More have most likely drowned, officials say, though their bodies have never been found. The fatalities have earned the river a grim nickname, Death River, though it is hundreds of miles from the violence along the front. —————————- Last year, the Mukachevo Border Guard Detachment broke up 56 criminal gangs helping Ukrainian men illegally leave the country during wartime, Lieutenant Fedorova said. Prices for help crossing the border, she said, have risen to as much as $10,000 today from $2,000 per person soon after the invasion. Smuggling a backpack of cigarettes, in contrast, pays as little as $200. Checkpoints have gone up on highways near the border, where cars are checked for men who might be trying to leave the country. And along the border, guards have put up additional infrared cameras and sensors triggered by footsteps, Lieutenant Fedorova said. The flow of draft dodgers in the west is a reflection of how large the specter of war looms over the lives of Ukrainian men, who by law are required to stay in the country. Most men turn up when summoned for military service rather than flee, said Sgt. Mykhailo Pavlov, the commander of a military recruitment office in the western city of Uzhhorod. A veteran of the fighting, he was wounded before serving as a recruitment officer. He said he talks to the men he drafts, describes the front and assures them they can improve their chances if they train well. ————————————- “Everybody is afraid to die, but we try to make them look at it from a different perspective,” he said — the perspective of survival. He also describes frankly the random risk of artillery shelling. Still, the efforts to avoid the draft can be elaborate. On a recent morning, within minutes of officials beginning a patrol to check papers, posts on the Telegram social networking site were tracking their movements, alerting men who want to avoid the draft. “Petofi Square,” warned a post in the channel, called Uzhhorod Radar, that tracks the recruitment officers as they walk through Petofi Sandor Square. In Kyiv, a similar site, Kyiv Weather, posts the risk of draft officer patrols in neighborhoods as sunny, cloudy and raining. Vitaly Semon, 30, a welder, nervously fished his passport from a pocket for soldiers checking documents one recent morning, and described his two exemptions, for a back ailment and as a caregiver for an elderly father. His papers checked out. “It’s our reality now,” he said of the document checks. In nearby villages, closer to the border, cars from other regions of Ukraine frequently cruise the streets and highways as men look for opportunities to cross out of the country, said Koval Fedir, the mayor of Tornivtsi, a village whose last houses overlook the fence along the border with Slovakia. Before the Russian invasion, cigarette smuggling — done to avoid high European Union taxes — infused many aspects of life in the village, he said, financing some lavish homes and new cars in the driveways. “It was profitable for everybody,” he said. Drones carrying boxes of cigarettes buzzed over the village and toward the Slovak border, sometimes crashing on the streets. Some smugglers used catapults to hurl cigarettes over the border fence. But it has all but faded as a business, since moving draft dodgers is more lucrative. Smugglers have taken to hiring Roma guides to steer men out of Ukraine, said Mr. Fedir. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/13/world/europe/ukraine-draft-dodgers.html Interesting article from the New York Times in light of that draconian mobilization bill going through a few days ago. Everyone automatically being drafted is making a lot of the semi-rich people that payed their way out of getting mobilized very nervous. The mobilization statistics for some regions are incredible | ||
sertas
Sweden878 Posts
| ||
| ||