| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Nouar
France3270 Posts
Please tell me the sender wasn't such an idiot as to put his own address in a simili-terror attack... Then again, terrorists in France and the US tend to leave passports lying around, so you never know xD So these were castor seeds, not directly ricin. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ricin-scare-prompted-castor-seeds-us-official/story?id=58254992 | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
spudde123
4814 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11527 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On October 04 2018 04:04 Plansix wrote: Again, I would be take anyone saying “I have very important information to tell the FBI” with a grain of salt. The FBI might already have said “very important” information. There can be 50 eye witnesses to a crime. You don’t need all 50 of them to make the case. How about "I have very important information specifically related to the charges in question" like at least 20 did? Ill return to this post if/when the report reveals jack shit was done. On that note, anyone want to guess how many people were actually interviewed? Over-Under 7.5 people. Who is over and who is under? I'm going under (I hope I am made to look foolish here but my hopes have dropped each day). One final thing, per Fox there will be only one copy of the report under lock and key to try and make sure the public never sees the report. No doubt plenty of Senators will tell us what's in it tho so that may not matter. Source: | ||
|
Nouar
France3270 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11527 Posts
On October 04 2018 04:11 On_Slaught wrote: How about "I have very important information specifically related to the charges in question" like at least 20 did? Ill return to this post if/when the report reveals jack shit was done. On that note, anyone want to guess how many people were actually interviewed? Over-Under 7.5 people. Who is over and who is under? I'm going under (I hope I am made to look foolish here but my hopes have dropped each day). One final thing, per Fox there will be only one copy of the report under lock and key to try and make sure the public never sees the report. No doubt plenty of Senators will tell us what's in it tho so that may not matter. Source: https://twitter.com/WardDPatrick/status/1047550456761913344 I wonder how that works. If the page is, for example, 20 pages long. And each senator needs half an hour to thoroughly read it. Do they postpone everything for at least two days until everyone has read it? What happens if it is longer? And who decides who gets to read it first, because they will have the advantage of having longer to prepare on how to react? Or do they just assume that no one actually cares, and two people read it and tell the others kinda whats in it? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On October 04 2018 04:27 Simberto wrote: I wonder how that works. If the page is, for example, 20 pages long. And each senator needs half an hour to thoroughly read it. Do they postpone everything for at least two days until everyone has read it? What happens if it is longer? And who decides who gets to read it first, because they will have the advantage of having longer to prepare on how to react? Or do they just assume that no one actually cares, and two people read it and tell the others kinda whats in it? I think they will just make copies and ask the senators to return them to the committee chairman when they are done reading them. The report isn’t classified, so the only concern is it being leaked. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
though obv i'd prefer if the SJC just agreed to make it public, with no/minimal redactions. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4773 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15690 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21712 Posts
Just release the whole thing so its harder to play smoke and mirrors with the result. | ||
|
GoTuNk!
Chile4591 Posts
On October 04 2018 04:41 Mohdoo wrote: The optics of keeping it secret are terrible. I hope Booker or someone else just yolo release it in its entirety. Nothing in it should be secret unless it is protecting someone other than Kavanaugh. I do not believe in government officials as high up as the supreme Court have the same privacy rights as citizens. There's too much on the line. Something everyone is gonna be on agreement on. Sadly there is just no privacy to protect at this point lol. | ||
|
Wulfey_LA
932 Posts
EDIT: so there is no way Mitchell knew to ask "have you ever helped someone with a polygraph" unless she knew this letter from the ex boyfriend existed. That is such a random thing. Time and time again it seems like team KAVANAUGH knows of stuff before it leaks out. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On October 04 2018 04:56 GoTuNk! wrote: Something everyone is gonna be on agreement on. Sadly there is just no privacy to protect at this point lol. They can just release a redacted report if necessary. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On October 04 2018 04:58 Wulfey_LA wrote: The EX boyfriend seems to not understand a basic thing about EX boyfriends. Why do they tend to be exes and not husbands? Because something was missing in their relationship that prevented the thing closing in a marriage deal. Ex boyfriends should not be surprised to learn that they never got to a sufficient connection level to be privvy to everything. Husbands have grounds to be surprised. EDIT: so there is no way Mitchell knew to ask "have you ever helped someone with a polygraph" unless she knew this letter from the ex boyfriend existed. That is such a random thing. Time and time again it seems like team KAVANAUGH knows of stuff before it leaks out. your edit raises an interesting point. i'm distrustful of coincidences. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
And the whole thing about the preparing someone for a polygraph does cause me to raise my eyebrows. I think some senators might have been sitting on this likely not real letter and let Mitchell know about its content. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Zoun vs Bunny
herO vs Solar
Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
BSL Team Wars
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
CSO Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
