• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:41
CET 17:41
KST 01:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool43Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw? Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open RSL Season 4 announced for March-April WardiTV Team League Season 10 KSL Week 87
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
mca64Launcher - New Version with StarCraft: Remast BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 General Discussion Soulkey's decision to leave C9 JaeDong's form before ASL
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group B 2026 Changsha Offline Cup [ASL21] Ro24 Group A ASL Season 21 LIVESTREAM with English Commentary
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Formula 1 Discussion Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3261 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 696

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 694 695 696 697 698 5594 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 14 2018 15:18 GMT
#13901
Yeah, that argument will hold water for some people. But there is also the lingering fear that if their area is hit by natural disaster the federal government isn’t going to help. That goes double for areas that have “angered” Trump.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18242 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 15:21:28
September 14 2018 15:21 GMT
#13902
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

Do you seriously believe this? Or are you hypothesizing other peoples' thought process.

Because there are plenty of effects of a storm that aren't instant death due to a wall falling over and crushing you, which can lead to a far slower/later death yet are directly attributable to the damage from the storm. Most notably disease due to unsanitary conditions (caused by houses and infrastructure blowing away and flooding).
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24761 Posts
September 14 2018 15:33 GMT
#13903
On September 15 2018 00:21 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

Do you seriously believe this? Or are you hypothesizing other peoples' thought process.

Because there are plenty of effects of a storm that aren't instant death due to a wall falling over and crushing you, which can lead to a far slower/later death yet are directly attributable to the damage from the storm. Most notably disease due to unsanitary conditions (caused by houses and infrastructure blowing away and flooding).

Yes I'm describing a likely common thought process that can explain why a lot of folks would believe claims that the number of hurricane deaths are horribly overblown. I understand the concepts you are explaining but many people do not. They are not incapable of understanding it (in most cases), but it isn't being forced-fed to them and they aren't seeking it out either.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 14 2018 15:43 GMT
#13904
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

You’re being unnecessarily dour and hyperbolic. I gather you have a very low opinion of your fellow citizens, but accusing them of dismissing how many people died (just because the President did) is a step too far.

You’re just going to make more people think the leftists call Trump supporters gullible idiots all the time and hate their countrymen, having given up on being part of one nation. (Since these kind of demeaning takes are omnipresent on cable news, you’re also going to be lumped into a mindless drone taking your marching orders from the liberal news media)
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9639 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 16:13:25
September 14 2018 15:52 GMT
#13905
On September 15 2018 00:43 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

You’re being unnecessarily dour and hyperbolic. I gather you have a very low opinion of your fellow citizens, but accusing them of dismissing how many people died (just because the President did) is a step too far.

You’re just going to make more people think the leftists call Trump supporters gullible idiots all the time and hate their countrymen, having given up on being part of one nation. (Since these kind of demeaning takes are omnipresent on cable news, you’re also going to be lumped into a mindless drone taking your marching orders from the liberal news media)


no one need look further than their favorite republican twitter account to see plenty examples of exactly what micronesia has posted. he didn’t claim every republican on earth is that stupid. but what he said is on display anywhere you look.

your post reads as if it’s a fringe belief, and it is not.

unless you’re implying they believe it’s a fiction for reasons other than the president said so, which i haven’t fully wrapped
my head around yet, but i think it’d be worse.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22153 Posts
September 14 2018 15:54 GMT
#13906
On September 15 2018 00:43 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

You’re being unnecessarily dour and hyperbolic. I gather you have a very low opinion of your fellow citizens, but accusing them of dismissing how many people died (just because the President did) is a step too far.

You’re just going to make more people think the leftists call Trump supporters gullible idiots all the time and hate their countrymen, having given up on being part of one nation. (Since these kind of demeaning takes are omnipresent on cable news, you’re also going to be lumped into a mindless drone taking your marching orders from the liberal news media)
You need to take a good hard look at your own party's supporters if you really believe they are not made up of a significant portion of gullible idiots who will eat up Trumps words and actually believe him.

It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9792 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 19:00:25
September 14 2018 16:15 GMT
#13907
Edit for context:
So police have tried to retroactively prove that a man who was killed by an officer was a criminal by executing a search warrant related to 'narcotics' on his house.
In the context of previous blatant police crimes and how officers get away with it every single time, this is an especially cruel way to go about it. For an organization to kill a man and then try to smear him is bad enough, but when its the organization sworn to protect and serve that man, how is the community around him supposed to react to that?


I don't know anything about US police/legal procedure. Is it normal to have a warrant with references to narcotics in relation to a recently deceased murder victim?
Is this a smear, or just police procedure?

Now KXAS reports that the day after the shooting, a Dallas Police Department investigator obtained a warrant to search Jean's apartment. The warrant, signed by 292nd District Court Judge Brandon Birmingham, says the police intended to look for "any contraband, such as narcotics," that could "constitute[e] evidence of a criminal offense."

The warrant seems to suggest police had reason to believe some sort of illegal substance was present at Jean's residence. When asked whether such probable cause existed, a Dallas police spokesperson referred Reason to the Texas Rangers, who took over the investigation soon after the shooting. A Texas Rangers spokesperson, in turn, referred Reason to the Dallas County District Attorney's Office.

A spokesperson for the district attorney said the search warrant was "fairly standard" for such a high-profile case, but added that "no specifics about the case will be released at this time to maintain the integrity of the case."

So it remains unclear why the warrant referenced narcotics. According to Houston-based criminal defense attorney Mark Bennett, there doesn't appear to be any legitimate legal reason for police to include that language. But there could be a practical one. "They want to smear the guy," he speculates. "He no longer has reason to complain about the search of his place, because he's dead," he adds.


https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/frfrfr
RIP Meatloaf <3
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 16:26:31
September 14 2018 16:26 GMT
#13908
On September 15 2018 01:15 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
Now KXAS reports that the day after the shooting, a Dallas Police Department investigator obtained a warrant to search Jean's apartment. The warrant, signed by 292nd District Court Judge Brandon Birmingham, says the police intended to look for "any contraband, such as narcotics," that could "constitute[e] evidence of a criminal offense."

The warrant seems to suggest police had reason to believe some sort of illegal substance was present at Jean's residence. When asked whether such probable cause existed, a Dallas police spokesperson referred Reason to the Texas Rangers, who took over the investigation soon after the shooting. A Texas Rangers spokesperson, in turn, referred Reason to the Dallas County District Attorney's Office.

A spokesperson for the district attorney said the search warrant was "fairly standard" for such a high-profile case, but added that "no specifics about the case will be released at this time to maintain the integrity of the case."

So it remains unclear why the warrant referenced narcotics. According to Houston-based criminal defense attorney Mark Bennett, there doesn't appear to be any legitimate legal reason for police to include that language. But there could be a practical one. "They want to smear the guy," he speculates. "He no longer has reason to complain about the search of his place, because he's dead," he adds.


https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/frfrfr

I don't know anything about US police/legal procedure. Is it normal to have a warrant with references to narcotics in relation to a recently deceased murder victim?
Is this a smear, or just police procedure?



100% a smear. They are trying to find something so they can go 'Look! the cop had to kill this guy in his own home after she broke in! He had drugs!!!!!'
Something witty
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14104 Posts
September 14 2018 16:35 GMT
#13909
On September 15 2018 01:15 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
Now KXAS reports that the day after the shooting, a Dallas Police Department investigator obtained a warrant to search Jean's apartment. The warrant, signed by 292nd District Court Judge Brandon Birmingham, says the police intended to look for "any contraband, such as narcotics," that could "constitute[e] evidence of a criminal offense."

The warrant seems to suggest police had reason to believe some sort of illegal substance was present at Jean's residence. When asked whether such probable cause existed, a Dallas police spokesperson referred Reason to the Texas Rangers, who took over the investigation soon after the shooting. A Texas Rangers spokesperson, in turn, referred Reason to the Dallas County District Attorney's Office.

A spokesperson for the district attorney said the search warrant was "fairly standard" for such a high-profile case, but added that "no specifics about the case will be released at this time to maintain the integrity of the case."

So it remains unclear why the warrant referenced narcotics. According to Houston-based criminal defense attorney Mark Bennett, there doesn't appear to be any legitimate legal reason for police to include that language. But there could be a practical one. "They want to smear the guy," he speculates. "He no longer has reason to complain about the search of his place, because he's dead," he adds.


https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/frfrfr

I don't know anything about US police/legal procedure. Is it normal to have a warrant with references to narcotics in relation to a recently deceased murder victim?
Is this a smear, or just police procedure?

I doubt its a smear but I don't know what else it could be. I don't think anyone is really dumb enough to try and get a search warrant the day after (especially when search warrants are a button press away most of the time) for no reason. I mean theres no way its not a crime if they back date it and theres no way it won't be found out either way once it goes to court.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 14 2018 16:38 GMT
#13910
On September 15 2018 01:35 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2018 01:15 Jockmcplop wrote:
Now KXAS reports that the day after the shooting, a Dallas Police Department investigator obtained a warrant to search Jean's apartment. The warrant, signed by 292nd District Court Judge Brandon Birmingham, says the police intended to look for "any contraband, such as narcotics," that could "constitute[e] evidence of a criminal offense."

The warrant seems to suggest police had reason to believe some sort of illegal substance was present at Jean's residence. When asked whether such probable cause existed, a Dallas police spokesperson referred Reason to the Texas Rangers, who took over the investigation soon after the shooting. A Texas Rangers spokesperson, in turn, referred Reason to the Dallas County District Attorney's Office.

A spokesperson for the district attorney said the search warrant was "fairly standard" for such a high-profile case, but added that "no specifics about the case will be released at this time to maintain the integrity of the case."

So it remains unclear why the warrant referenced narcotics. According to Houston-based criminal defense attorney Mark Bennett, there doesn't appear to be any legitimate legal reason for police to include that language. But there could be a practical one. "They want to smear the guy," he speculates. "He no longer has reason to complain about the search of his place, because he's dead," he adds.


https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/12/frfrfr

I don't know anything about US police/legal procedure. Is it normal to have a warrant with references to narcotics in relation to a recently deceased murder victim?
Is this a smear, or just police procedure?

I doubt its a smear but I don't know what else it could be. I don't think anyone is really dumb enough to try and get a search warrant the day after (especially when search warrants are a button press away most of the time) for no reason. I mean theres no way its not a crime if they back date it and theres no way it won't be found out either way once it goes to court.

It is 100% the police department trying to protect their own. They previously released a statement saying the guy "refused to obey commands" and have refused to release information on if the officer was intoxicated.

The refused to respond/obey to commends line is extra funny because the response from reporters was "It's his house."
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 16:46:14
September 14 2018 16:43 GMT
#13911
Update to yesterday's Manafort news... he is officially flipping. To nobodies surprise Guiliani/Trump were wrong again. I've seen some reports that say his cooperation may be focused only on pre-campaign Russian dealings, but The Hill article makes it seem like it could be more. Either way we are now at the point where yet another potential witness is talking to, and sharing documents with, Mueller.

Would love to have seen Trump's reaction to the news. We may get it via twitter I suppose.

Source:
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
September 14 2018 16:44 GMT
#13912
--- Nuked ---
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 16:58:09
September 14 2018 16:55 GMT
#13913
On September 14 2018 22:07 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2018 07:30 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On September 14 2018 06:16 Plansix wrote:
I always get weirded out by fantasy series with humanoids that are all one skin color that just happens to be white. I get that its all magic and authors can make it whatever they want, but entire races that are kinda close to humans but are all Caucasian just because seems like weird choice for an author. Unless the world lacks a sun, then it sort of makes sense.

Most classic fantasy tend to be analogues for Europe, especially medieval Europe. And most of them also draw heavily from mid 20th century European authors that basically set the stage for the fantasy genre (Tolkein in particular).

Plus everyone knows classic fantasy = British accents, and everyone being white is largely what happens with the British accent casting pool. Especially in a series where birthright and lineage are plot relevant details, and not like Thor where you can have random Idris Elba.

Thor’s plot has been heavily driven by one guy being heir to the throne and his siblings disagreeing with that. Birthright and lineage are absolutely relevant, it’s just black skin isn’t really the issue with suspending disbelief in Marvel movies.

Except that the character of Hiemdall has no relevance to birthright and lineage. If it was Thor, who is involved in the issue of lineage, was black with white parents then a big suspension of disbelief would occur. Then again Loki looks distinctively not frost giant so who knows.
____

On September 15 2018 00:43 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

You’re being unnecessarily dour and hyperbolic. I gather you have a very low opinion of your fellow citizens, but accusing them of dismissing how many people died (just because the President did) is a step too far.

You’re just going to make more people think the leftists call Trump supporters gullible idiots all the time and hate their countrymen, having given up on being part of one nation. (Since these kind of demeaning takes are omnipresent on cable news, you’re also going to be lumped into a mindless drone taking your marching orders from the liberal news media)

Poe's law, I can't tell if Danglars is serious or not.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 14 2018 17:03 GMT
#13914
Marvel's Thor was written by hippies on drugs during the 1960s, which is way he ran on a rainbow road and went to all these wild planets to have adventures. Also in the mythology Loki isn't Thor's brother, gives birth to the big ass wolf and the world serpent. Loki was also a big horse that seduced another big horse to stop a Giant from building a wall and winning a bet, because that is how myths work. But that was way to out there for even drug inspired Marvel comics, so they just make him Thor's brother. Hiemdall being black would be the least shocking things in Norse myths and is preferable to all the animal fucking that leads to nightmare creatures.

I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 14 2018 17:04 GMT
#13915
On September 15 2018 00:33 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2018 00:21 Acrofales wrote:
On September 15 2018 00:11 micronesia wrote:
I wasn't paying close attention to the news coverage when the big storm hit Puerto Rico, but I have seen headlines arguing about how many people died. It is obviously becoming a politicized issue, driven completely by the left to make the current administration look bad. How could one storm or hurricane kill thousands of people? The president's explanation makes sense to me: There have been thousands of deaths attributed to the hurricane that would have happened anyway, which isn't the government's fault.

-A lot of people, probably.

Do you seriously believe this? Or are you hypothesizing other peoples' thought process.

Because there are plenty of effects of a storm that aren't instant death due to a wall falling over and crushing you, which can lead to a far slower/later death yet are directly attributable to the damage from the storm. Most notably disease due to unsanitary conditions (caused by houses and infrastructure blowing away and flooding).

Yes I'm describing a likely common thought process that can explain why a lot of folks would believe claims that the number of hurricane deaths are horribly overblown. I understand the concepts you are explaining but many people do not. They are not incapable of understanding it (in most cases), but it isn't being forced-fed to them and they aren't seeking it out either.

something about the way your first post is written makes it unclear, at least at first glance, that you're describing how some people erroneously think rather than what you believe. Not sure how to change it; maybe move the note about it being a reference to others' thoughts at the start instead of the end? with a disclaimer that you're not agreeing with it?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 14 2018 17:06 GMT
#13916
On September 14 2018 21:52 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Except they were both teenagers in HS. Never mind the statute of limitations involved, neither were involved with the federal government.

were you responding to me? it's not clear if you wnated me to counter-respond or if you were talking to the thread.
and again, this matter has already been addressed, how come you didn't see the explanations that covered why the fbi would be involved?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 14 2018 17:07 GMT
#13917
On September 14 2018 15:03 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2018 10:13 Introvert wrote:
For the purpose of comedy, I sincerely hope the Guardian isn't getting trolled and this is the actual story of the supposed incident. They might be just be embarrassing themselves one last time before this is over.

I suppose for context I should add that this is a story from a well-respected news source on the last minute, highly suspicious accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh for some sort of misconduct, with #MeToo overtones.

A senior Democratic senator has alerted federal investigators to a confidential letter she received regarding Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump’s conservative nominee for the US supreme court, in an extraordinary move that suggested she had been informed of possible wrongdoing.

Dianne Feinstein, who is the top Democrat on the Senate judiciary committee, said she had received information about Kavanaugh’s nomination from an individual who had strongly requested confidentiality. The letter was likely passed on to the FBI because the bureau is responsible for background checks into judicial nominees.

News of the letter came as Judge Kavanaugh faced fresh scrutiny about his relationship with another judge, who was forced to resign from the bench last year.

“I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the supreme court,” Feinstein said in a statement.

“That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities,” she said.

A source who said they were briefed on the contents of the letter said it described an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman that took place when both were 17 years old and at a party. According to the source, Kavanaugh and a male friend had locked her in a room against her will, making her feel threatened, but she was able to get out of the room. The Guardian has not verified the apparent claims in the letter. It is not yet clear who wrote it.

A spokesman for Feinstein declined to comment. The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.

While additional details about the letter were scarce, two media outlets have reported that the person who wrote the letter is being represented by an attorney, Debra Katz, who has been described in media reports as Washington’s #MeToo lawyer.

Katz has not responded to a request for comment from the Guardian. BuzzFeed reported that she was seen on Capitol Hill on Wednesday night, shortly after the Intercept first reported the existence of the letter.


And just as the cherry on top, the last ~900 words of the article are all about Kavanaugh's relationship to now-disgraced former Judge Kozinski, which is an obvious attempt to try and make this something, while being a recognition that it's really nothing. It's pretty dirty, really, but it IS funny.

www.theguardian.com

Edit: or, as one theoy I read says, this is purposely ridiculous so that when the "real story" comes out, it enhances it. Interesting thought.

The nomination process is going quite well if Feinstein’s reduced to accusing Kavanaugh of locking someone in a room when he was a teenager. I guess the line is that he made a girl feel threatened when he was young, and now he’s making all women feel threatened about abortion law now. The smear by association is nothing new; they tried the same with the papers that passed his desk from some other Bush administration figure that was misbehaving.


The New Yorker reports that the allegation is basically attempted rape. He covered her mouth, attempted to force himself on her, and they turned up the music in the room so others wouldn't hear her protests. This woman first provided the letter to Feinstein in July.

No doubt Kavanaugh 's supporters will now argue that the rape accuser must be lying because of x, y, and z. I just want to know why Feinstein sat on this.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-09-14 17:10:20
September 14 2018 17:09 GMT
#13918
Maybe what you wrote Plansix is all true, but that's not the argument kwark was making now was it? Honestly, I don't particularily care about the witcher/marvel/starwars universe, I am just pointing out that it makes no sense to pick out the plot is about birthright and lineage, and then pick out a guy who is unrelated to that plot as being black. Disclaimer: I haven't actually watched Thor, but from what I know of Norse mythology, I am guessing that Heimdallr is unrelated to plots of lineage and birthright.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 14 2018 17:10 GMT
#13919
Apparently some Willie Nelson fans are mad that he played a concert for/with Beto O'Rourke. Just think about going through your life thinking that Willie Nelson was a Republican or wasn't super fucking left leaning? Like, he has supported Democrats in the past. Like a lot of them.

It is like this group of people got into politics and didn't brother to find out what everyone else in existence was doing for the majority of their lives.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15742 Posts
September 14 2018 17:12 GMT
#13920
On September 15 2018 02:07 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2018 15:03 Danglars wrote:
On September 14 2018 10:13 Introvert wrote:
For the purpose of comedy, I sincerely hope the Guardian isn't getting trolled and this is the actual story of the supposed incident. They might be just be embarrassing themselves one last time before this is over.

I suppose for context I should add that this is a story from a well-respected news source on the last minute, highly suspicious accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh for some sort of misconduct, with #MeToo overtones.

A senior Democratic senator has alerted federal investigators to a confidential letter she received regarding Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump’s conservative nominee for the US supreme court, in an extraordinary move that suggested she had been informed of possible wrongdoing.

Dianne Feinstein, who is the top Democrat on the Senate judiciary committee, said she had received information about Kavanaugh’s nomination from an individual who had strongly requested confidentiality. The letter was likely passed on to the FBI because the bureau is responsible for background checks into judicial nominees.

News of the letter came as Judge Kavanaugh faced fresh scrutiny about his relationship with another judge, who was forced to resign from the bench last year.

“I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the supreme court,” Feinstein said in a statement.

“That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities,” she said.

A source who said they were briefed on the contents of the letter said it described an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman that took place when both were 17 years old and at a party. According to the source, Kavanaugh and a male friend had locked her in a room against her will, making her feel threatened, but she was able to get out of the room. The Guardian has not verified the apparent claims in the letter. It is not yet clear who wrote it.

A spokesman for Feinstein declined to comment. The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.

While additional details about the letter were scarce, two media outlets have reported that the person who wrote the letter is being represented by an attorney, Debra Katz, who has been described in media reports as Washington’s #MeToo lawyer.

Katz has not responded to a request for comment from the Guardian. BuzzFeed reported that she was seen on Capitol Hill on Wednesday night, shortly after the Intercept first reported the existence of the letter.


And just as the cherry on top, the last ~900 words of the article are all about Kavanaugh's relationship to now-disgraced former Judge Kozinski, which is an obvious attempt to try and make this something, while being a recognition that it's really nothing. It's pretty dirty, really, but it IS funny.

www.theguardian.com

Edit: or, as one theoy I read says, this is purposely ridiculous so that when the "real story" comes out, it enhances it. Interesting thought.

The nomination process is going quite well if Feinstein’s reduced to accusing Kavanaugh of locking someone in a room when he was a teenager. I guess the line is that he made a girl feel threatened when he was young, and now he’s making all women feel threatened about abortion law now. The smear by association is nothing new; they tried the same with the papers that passed his desk from some other Bush administration figure that was misbehaving.


The New Yorker reports that the allegation is basically attempted rape. He covered her mouth, attempted to force himself on her, and they turned up the music in the room so others wouldn't hear her protests. This woman first provided the letter to Feinstein in July.

No doubt Kavanaugh 's supporters will now argue that the rape accuser must be lying because of x, y, and z. I just want to know why Feinstein sat on this.


And when this is eventually shown to be credible, people will talk about how rape is super common in rural communities and how women are expected to stop whining about it for the sake of social cohesion. Which is true, of course, but isn't the kind of standard I have for the supreme court. Even if we were to assume rape is somewhat common, I do not want a somewhat common man on the supreme court.
Prev 1 694 695 696 697 698 5594 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 338
elazer 60
Trikslyr47
Rex 38
Codebar 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 22384
Calm 5033
Shuttle 3276
Bisu 2603
ggaemo 809
Larva 677
Mini 588
Stork 458
Soma 421
BeSt 411
[ Show more ]
firebathero 329
Leta 279
Snow 260
Light 252
Rush 248
EffOrt 244
ZerO 226
actioN 178
PianO 117
Dewaltoss 75
Zeus 74
Mind 67
Sharp 54
HiyA 44
Free 34
Barracks 30
sorry 28
Movie 27
soO 17
IntoTheRainbow 16
Sacsri 12
Terrorterran 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
ivOry 9
Dota 2
Gorgc7683
Counter-Strike
fl0m1506
ceh9440
byalli173
edward154
oskar76
adren_tv44
Heroes of the Storm
MindelVK16
Other Games
singsing1891
Grubby1642
hiko792
FrodaN745
B2W.Neo606
DeMusliM327
Hui .154
Liquid`VortiX135
crisheroes132
Sick110
QueenE106
ZerO(Twitch)19
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream48
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 60
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV226
League of Legends
• Nemesis4558
• TFBlade828
• Shiphtur304
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
7h 19m
Replay Cast
16h 19m
Afreeca Starleague
17h 19m
hero vs YSC
Larva vs Shine
Kung Fu Cup
18h 19m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
KCM Race Survival
1d 16h
The PondCast
1d 17h
WardiTV Team League
1d 19h
OSC
1d 19h
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Team League
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Zoun
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Team League
3 days
Platinum Heroes Events
3 days
BSL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
4 days
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
OSC
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-23
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.