|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
Northern Ireland27306 Posts
On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 06:48 Billyboy wrote:
He needs to get obliterated at the polls (and not the way he uses the word) as Sim said. On July 08 2026 07:35 Simberto wrote:
But it would require losing the election so hard that it is very obvious and there really is no question that they got demolished. Not just a moderate loss, but a loss so massive that they cannot explain it away. I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way. Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 06:48 Billyboy wrote:
He needs to get obliterated at the polls (and not the way he uses the word) as Sim said. On July 08 2026 07:35 Simberto wrote:
But it would require losing the election so hard that it is very obvious and there really is no question that they got demolished. Not just a moderate loss, but a loss so massive that they cannot explain it away. I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way. Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off.
Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones.
Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption.
Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour
So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening.
So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there.
Not really sure what the issue is with that really.
|
Iran is promising a crushing response, Bahrain air sirens are blaring. I still think this will be short lived but it seems more like new normal of this type of outburst then a thing of the past.
|
United States44269 Posts
This is one of the ceasefires of all time.
|
Lots more fire than cease
|
Northern Ireland27306 Posts
On July 08 2026 12:11 KwarK wrote:
This is one of the ceasefires of all time.
What do you mean ceasefire, wasn’t this war won in like a week? What’d I miss?
|
On July 08 2026 12:20 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 12:11 KwarK wrote:
This is one of the ceasefires of all time. What do you mean ceasefire, wasn’t this war won in like a week? What’d I miss?
It was won, but shortly after that Trump needed our help to win the war, but then he decided he was going to destroy an entire civilisation if everyone didn't let him win the war, and then Trump was Jesus and now he appears to be conducting the war entirely at random day by day.
Hope that clarifies things.
|
Northern Ireland27306 Posts
On July 08 2026 12:23 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 12:20 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 12:11 KwarK wrote:
This is one of the ceasefires of all time. What do you mean ceasefire, wasn’t this war won in like a week? What’d I miss? It was won, but shortly after that Trump needed our help to win the war, but then he decided he was going to destroy an entire civilisation if everyone didn't let him win the war, and then Trump was Jesus and now he appears to be conducting the war entirely at random day by day. Hope that clarifies things.
Phew, lucky it’s guys like Trump at the helm because if it were me I’d be getting confused by all the changes in circumstance
|
On July 08 2026 12:34 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 12:23 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2026 12:20 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 12:11 KwarK wrote:
This is one of the ceasefires of all time. What do you mean ceasefire, wasn’t this war won in like a week? What’d I miss? It was won, but shortly after that Trump needed our help to win the war, but then he decided he was going to destroy an entire civilisation if everyone didn't let him win the war, and then Trump was Jesus and now he appears to be conducting the war entirely at random day by day. Hope that clarifies things. Phew, lucky it’s guys like Trump at the helm because if it were me I’d be getting confused by all the changes in circumstance
The important thing to remember is that the winner of the most fifa peace prices in history has ended this war more often than anyone had ever believed possible.
|
He is saving us from the Nukes again.
|
Northern Ireland27306 Posts
On July 08 2026 13:23 Simberto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 12:34 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 12:23 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2026 12:20 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 12:11 KwarK wrote:
This is one of the ceasefires of all time. What do you mean ceasefire, wasn’t this war won in like a week? What’d I miss? It was won, but shortly after that Trump needed our help to win the war, but then he decided he was going to destroy an entire civilisation if everyone didn't let him win the war, and then Trump was Jesus and now he appears to be conducting the war entirely at random day by day. Hope that clarifies things. Phew, lucky it’s guys like Trump at the helm because if it were me I’d be getting confused by all the changes in circumstance The important thing to remember is that the winner of the most fifa peace prices in history has ended this war more often than anyone had ever believed possible.
Not just wars but the careers of many a political satirist. Many have just switched to the news desk because simply reporting on reality is better material than they could conjure
|
On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 06:48 Billyboy wrote:
He needs to get obliterated at the polls (and not the way he uses the word) as Sim said. On July 08 2026 07:35 Simberto wrote:
But it would require losing the election so hard that it is very obvious and there really is no question that they got demolished. Not just a moderate loss, but a loss so massive that they cannot explain it away. I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way. Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 06:48 Billyboy wrote:
He needs to get obliterated at the polls (and not the way he uses the word) as Sim said. On July 08 2026 07:35 Simberto wrote:
But it would require losing the election so hard that it is very obvious and there really is no question that they got demolished. Not just a moderate loss, but a loss so massive that they cannot explain it away. I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way. Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really.
To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern.
For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one.
And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options.
|
On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 06:48 Billyboy wrote:
He needs to get obliterated at the polls (and not the way he uses the word) as Sim said. On July 08 2026 07:35 Simberto wrote:
But it would require losing the election so hard that it is very obvious and there really is no question that they got demolished. Not just a moderate loss, but a loss so massive that they cannot explain it away. I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way. Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 06:48 Billyboy wrote:
He needs to get obliterated at the polls (and not the way he uses the word) as Sim said. On July 08 2026 07:35 Simberto wrote:
But it would require losing the election so hard that it is very obvious and there really is no question that they got demolished. Not just a moderate loss, but a loss so massive that they cannot explain it away. I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way. Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options.
This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump?
|
On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:
[quote][quote]I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way.
Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:15 dyhb wrote:
[quote][quote]I swear that you all are trying to get pre-mad that an election win wasn't big enough to change everything, instantly, like in a Hollywood movie. The country will still be heavily divided, and that shit predates Trump and will continue after Trump. Accept a narrow victory and focus on stacking the gains 2026->2028. Softcore assassination porn and weird fantasying about avoiding Democracy when you don't like the results is not the way.
Your heart's in the right place, but your head is not. Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game. I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump?
Are all proprietors of memecoins the same?
|
On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:
[quote]
Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game.
I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:
[quote]
Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game.
I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same?
The proprietors all equally fail to guarantee that it's impossible for someone to lose their life savings in them if they really want to.
|
On July 08 2026 16:09 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:
[quote]I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office.
Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:
[quote]I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office.
Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same? The proprietors all equally fail to guarantee that it's impossible for someone to lose their life savings in them if they really want to.
Oh. But they're different in other ways?
|
On July 08 2026 16:10 Fleetfeet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:09 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:
[quote]
GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair.
Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:
[quote]
Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them.
I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape.
Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same? The proprietors all equally fail to guarantee that it's impossible for someone to lose their life savings in them if they really want to. Oh. But they're different in other ways?
You're saying you're okay with someone personally shooting Trump because they personally lost their life savings, even if they are the die-hardest MAGA who loves the use of the military and DHS, because for example you don't like some random other thing Trump did like attacked Iran in a war with collateral damage that involved a blown up school? Sounds like you want him killed for reasons other than the memecoin.
|
On July 08 2026 16:21 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:10 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:09 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:
[quote]Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile.
[quote]The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same? The proprietors all equally fail to guarantee that it's impossible for someone to lose their life savings in them if they really want to. Oh. But they're different in other ways? You're saying you're okay with someone personally shooting Trump because they personally lost their life savings, even if they are the die-hardest MAGA who loves the use of the military and DHS, because for example you don't like some random other thing Trump did like attacked Iran in a war with collateral damage that involved a blown up school? Sounds like you want him killed for reasons other than the memecoin.
No you fucking bingbong, I'm saying in the hypothetical where trump were assassinated I'm 'okay with' it if it's a result of his moral failings, an example of which I offered being him launching a memecoin as president.
Given the hypothetical of Trump's assassination, what moral failing of Trump's is your preferred example?
|
On July 08 2026 16:26 Fleetfeet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:21 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 16:10 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:09 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:
[quote]
I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit.
I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’.
And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block.
Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same? The proprietors all equally fail to guarantee that it's impossible for someone to lose their life savings in them if they really want to. Oh. But they're different in other ways? You're saying you're okay with someone personally shooting Trump because they personally lost their life savings, even if they are the die-hardest MAGA who loves the use of the military and DHS, because for example you don't like some random other thing Trump did like attacked Iran in a war with collateral damage that involved a blown up school? Sounds like you want him killed for reasons other than the memecoin. No you fucking bingbong, I'm saying in the hypothetical where trump were assassinated I'm 'okay with' it if it's a result of his moral failings, an example of which I offered being him launching a memecoin as president. Given the hypothetical of Trump's assassination, what moral failing of Trump's is your preferred example?
I don't have an example because I'm here in civilization where we aren't okay with assassinating presidents or memecoin founders.
|
On July 08 2026 16:31 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:26 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:21 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 16:10 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:09 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:
[quote]Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same? The proprietors all equally fail to guarantee that it's impossible for someone to lose their life savings in them if they really want to. Oh. But they're different in other ways? You're saying you're okay with someone personally shooting Trump because they personally lost their life savings, even if they are the die-hardest MAGA who loves the use of the military and DHS, because for example you don't like some random other thing Trump did like attacked Iran in a war with collateral damage that involved a blown up school? Sounds like you want him killed for reasons other than the memecoin. No you fucking bingbong, I'm saying in the hypothetical where trump were assassinated I'm 'okay with' it if it's a result of his moral failings, an example of which I offered being him launching a memecoin as president. Given the hypothetical of Trump's assassination, what moral failing of Trump's is your preferred example? I don't have an example because I'm here in civilization where we aren't okay with assassinating presidents or memecoin founders.
Too complicated for you. I get it.
You'll get 'em next time, champ.
|
On July 08 2026 16:05 Fleetfeet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2026 16:00 oBlade wrote:On July 08 2026 15:50 Fleetfeet wrote:On July 08 2026 11:36 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:43 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 10:33 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 10:00 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:41 Billyboy wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:
[quote]
Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game.
I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. GH is doing what you said, he’s setting up to quote the posts of Sim and Jan, and claim they need to join his revolution or something. The rest of us are just mixing hope and despair. Small election wins in subsequent elections are the kind of progress we need and can use, and big wins are possible if Iran keeps going the way its going and the tariffs keep killing the economy. I think the morose attitude on what a small win will say about America is puerile. On July 08 2026 09:50 WombaT wrote:On July 08 2026 09:37 dyhb wrote:On July 08 2026 09:27 Billyboy wrote:
[quote]
Odd strawman from my post arguing against him dying in a video game.
I did say softcore porn. Hardcore porn would be saying you think Donald Trump should be assassinated prior to leaving office. Actually, transitioning from a video game to a Hollywood drama about the perfect election victory has a narrative rhyme that I missed the first time around. Nonetheless I’m pretty sure Billyboy nor Simberto expressed no such assassination sentiment, so it feels odd to me to throw it out in a direct reply to them. I’ve no such compunctions and I’ll admit to that, the sooner the cunt is out of office the better. Given there are seemingly no limits to what his own party will tolerate, and he’s clearly not going to face censure for his many crimes, death is quite the equaliser, something no person can escape. Would prefer natural causes or a hilarious accident than assassination, which I don’t support. The softcore assassination porn was more directed at you and simberto ("A much better scenario than assassination in minecraft" as an evaluation of degree). To Billy, it appears that his problem with assassination is martyrdom, not assassination. I wholly reject that, I’m in the hardcore assassination porn camp, give me some credit. I don’t think that’s accurate based on Billy’s general posting and what I’ve gleamed from his musing in general. He’s free to speak for himself of course, but contextually I took him to mean ‘assassination is bad, and there may be a martyr effect’, not ‘assassination is bad because there’s a martyr effect’. And to follow your earlier billionaire logic, not sure why it’s bad really. I think the death of a person would be of a benefit for wider society, what’s the problem? If you support any domestic policy or foreign intervention that so much as kills 2 people well, you’re twice as bad as me right off the block. Because you're not the only one on the block with ideas on who in society we should kill in order to make society better off. Perhaps not but my ideas are actually good ones. Facetiousness aside maybe Republicans should have backed impeachment, as they should have if they had any gumption. Instead we’re locked into 4 years of absolutely blatant corruption, with a man who has already skirted his just desserts actively stacking institutions in his favour So I mean you can’t get rid of him via legitimate means, that ain’t happening. So it’s either health issue, assassin or just sitting around watching this certifiable prick fuck around for another few years. I know where my preferences would lie there. Not really sure what the issue is with that really. To steelman dyhb's position, I think the bar being raised to assassinating a sitting president as acceptable political violence, it's important to recognize all the stuff that is beneath that bar which must then also be acceptable political violence. If you're okay with Trump being assassinated, then you'd have to accept Obama being assassinated also. After all, he's just a former president and not the sitting president. I think there's merit to that concern. For myself I'm 'okay with' Trump being assassinated for a reason other than him being a republican president. Someone lost their life savings dumping into trumpcoin and then got rugpulled and wants revenge, or some similar sort of karmic justice for Trump's many moral failings. Less a political assassination, more a personal one. And yeah obviously I'd rather we weren't talking about a sitting president being assassinated, but when he's this brazenly corrupt and the system is powerless to remove him, of course people are gonna talk about other options. This applies to any proprietor of a memecoin or just Trump? Are all proprietors of memecoins the same?
We need to set a limit. I'd say all those that rugpulled 1B or more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
