|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On July 20 2018 11:19 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 09:56 Biff The Understudy wrote:On July 20 2018 07:19 On_Slaught wrote:On July 20 2018 07:14 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 07:04 TheTenthDoc wrote: Is it really gaslighting if you believe the things you're saying that are making people question their own grasp on reality?
Also, I'm not sure how what Trump is doing could be described as gaslighting because he's not making anyone believe anything things happened that didn't happen and nobody is questioning their own sanity, but nobody seems to use terms correctly anyway so. You don't think that his announcing today that Putin was coming to the White House this fall was gaslighting? He is deliberately trolling the media and the opposition. Was he trolling when he said he'd consider handing over ex-diplomats for interrogation? We really going to just chalk his bad ideas up to 3d chess? Seems just as likely, if not more likely, that he is just and idiot who says and does stupid things. Also, how is the President trolling the press, if that is what it is, in any way appropriate? It’s gonna take a long time for Dauntless to admit he elected a complete and utter moron to the White House, that’s all there is to it. People who voted for this clown hold on to the idea he is « trolling » or whatever because of what the fact they enthusiastically supported such a giant, incompetent c... says about them. Far from it. Trump is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. Hell, he is acting more conservative than the fools on Capitol Hill. Earlier today, I saw an article (I think it was from The Hill) that discussed how Trump was unhappy with how the GOP refused to cut as much funding from various administrative agencies as Trump had requested. It is shit like that which makes congressional republicans so despised among the base. Edit: Here is an article talking about it. Trump is so conservative he added a trillion to the debt. But sure, 2 billion in cuts to the EPA catches your eye.
|
5930 Posts
Besides the Supreme Court and elimination of the Federal Government, both things easy to do with a RRR Congress, I can't see how he's been positive for conservative causes. His lack of intellectual curiosity is a problem for policy and this is best shown in his whole tariff and trade war. There's a way to conduct a trade war and it isn't done by assuming that factories run off 1960s technology and theory.
If recent polling means anything, people's support for the trade war has softened considerably because it predictably doesn't bring back US manufacturing jobs and instead throws a wrench in US manufacturing.
|
On July 20 2018 12:41 CorsairHero wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 11:19 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 09:56 Biff The Understudy wrote:On July 20 2018 07:19 On_Slaught wrote:On July 20 2018 07:14 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 07:04 TheTenthDoc wrote: Is it really gaslighting if you believe the things you're saying that are making people question their own grasp on reality?
Also, I'm not sure how what Trump is doing could be described as gaslighting because he's not making anyone believe anything things happened that didn't happen and nobody is questioning their own sanity, but nobody seems to use terms correctly anyway so. You don't think that his announcing today that Putin was coming to the White House this fall was gaslighting? He is deliberately trolling the media and the opposition. Was he trolling when he said he'd consider handing over ex-diplomats for interrogation? We really going to just chalk his bad ideas up to 3d chess? Seems just as likely, if not more likely, that he is just and idiot who says and does stupid things. Also, how is the President trolling the press, if that is what it is, in any way appropriate? It’s gonna take a long time for Dauntless to admit he elected a complete and utter moron to the White House, that’s all there is to it. People who voted for this clown hold on to the idea he is « trolling » or whatever because of what the fact they enthusiastically supported such a giant, incompetent c... says about them. Far from it. Trump is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. Hell, he is acting more conservative than the fools on Capitol Hill. Earlier today, I saw an article (I think it was from The Hill) that discussed how Trump was unhappy with how the GOP refused to cut as much funding from various administrative agencies as Trump had requested. It is shit like that which makes congressional republicans so despised among the base. Edit: Here is an article talking about it. Trump is so conservative he added a trillion to the debt. But sure, 2 billion in cuts to the EPA catches your eye. Presidents don’t draft budgets. Trump didn’t want what the GOP gave him, but they forced him to sign it or face a shut down.
|
On July 20 2018 12:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 11:19 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 09:56 Biff The Understudy wrote:On July 20 2018 07:19 On_Slaught wrote:On July 20 2018 07:14 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 07:04 TheTenthDoc wrote: Is it really gaslighting if you believe the things you're saying that are making people question their own grasp on reality?
Also, I'm not sure how what Trump is doing could be described as gaslighting because he's not making anyone believe anything things happened that didn't happen and nobody is questioning their own sanity, but nobody seems to use terms correctly anyway so. You don't think that his announcing today that Putin was coming to the White House this fall was gaslighting? He is deliberately trolling the media and the opposition. Was he trolling when he said he'd consider handing over ex-diplomats for interrogation? We really going to just chalk his bad ideas up to 3d chess? Seems just as likely, if not more likely, that he is just and idiot who says and does stupid things. Also, how is the President trolling the press, if that is what it is, in any way appropriate? It’s gonna take a long time for Dauntless to admit he elected a complete and utter moron to the White House, that’s all there is to it. People who voted for this clown hold on to the idea he is « trolling » or whatever because of what the fact they enthusiastically supported such a giant, incompetent c... says about them. Far from it. Trump is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. Hell, he is acting more conservative than the fools on Capitol Hill. Earlier today, I saw an article (I think it was from The Hill) that discussed how Trump was unhappy with how the GOP refused to cut as much funding from various administrative agencies as Trump had requested. It is shit like that which makes congressional republicans so despised among the base. Edit: Here is an article talking about it. Even at the costs of others lives and well being, you're standing by this guy? Like whom?
|
On July 20 2018 12:58 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 12:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:On July 20 2018 11:19 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 09:56 Biff The Understudy wrote:On July 20 2018 07:19 On_Slaught wrote:On July 20 2018 07:14 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 07:04 TheTenthDoc wrote: Is it really gaslighting if you believe the things you're saying that are making people question their own grasp on reality?
Also, I'm not sure how what Trump is doing could be described as gaslighting because he's not making anyone believe anything things happened that didn't happen and nobody is questioning their own sanity, but nobody seems to use terms correctly anyway so. You don't think that his announcing today that Putin was coming to the White House this fall was gaslighting? He is deliberately trolling the media and the opposition. Was he trolling when he said he'd consider handing over ex-diplomats for interrogation? We really going to just chalk his bad ideas up to 3d chess? Seems just as likely, if not more likely, that he is just and idiot who says and does stupid things. Also, how is the President trolling the press, if that is what it is, in any way appropriate? It’s gonna take a long time for Dauntless to admit he elected a complete and utter moron to the White House, that’s all there is to it. People who voted for this clown hold on to the idea he is « trolling » or whatever because of what the fact they enthusiastically supported such a giant, incompetent c... says about them. Far from it. Trump is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. Hell, he is acting more conservative than the fools on Capitol Hill. Earlier today, I saw an article (I think it was from The Hill) that discussed how Trump was unhappy with how the GOP refused to cut as much funding from various administrative agencies as Trump had requested. It is shit like that which makes congressional republicans so despised among the base. Edit: Here is an article talking about it. Even at the costs of others lives and well being, you're standing by this guy? Like whom? Hi. You might remember a couple of months ago I brought up how repealing the ACA without a robust replacement would literally kill me. That hasn't changed, but since then (in early July), the Trump administration has continued to undermine the ACA without any replacement plan by putting a hold on the risk adjustment transfers and cut funding for the enrollment assistance referred to as navigators again.
But we could also go back to discussing the kids in cages, the kids who weren't bathed for months, the kids who are attending their own hearings at one year old, and such if you'd rather focus on that avenue of harm.
|
5930 Posts
We can also talk about domestic industries starting to struggle with the increased steel and aluminium prices because this administration doesn't get the first thing about industrialized economies.
If Trump actually targeted final goods, he could achieve his goal of making Americans buy American and put actual political pressure on his opponents. Instead, the vast majority of Trump's tariffs are targeting capital and intermediary goods which makes no sense. It just makes the final good more expensive, which is then passed onto the consumer.
Its completely self destructive and only exists if you still think the world economy is the same as it was in the 1960s. There's no 3D chess here, China and Canada aren't stupid enough to specifically target capital and intermediary goods from America and are instead targeting final goods from red states.
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/putin-appears-to-be-targeting-us-officials-who-worked-to-sanction-russia/2018/07/19/289059ac-8b67-11e8-8aea-86e88ae760d8_story.html
Almost from the day he arrived in Moscow as the U.S. ambassador in 2012, Michael McFaul and his family were subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment.
According to McFaul’s book “From Cold War to Hot Peace,” Russian authorities followed him to his son’s soccer game and on outings to McDonald’s. They trailed his children’s bus to school and sat behind the family at church. They slashed the tires of an embassy staffer’s car and broke into the homes of other employees.
Embassy security officials advised McFaul there was only one secure room at the embassy he and his wife should use if they ever quarreled because everywhere else was monitored by the Russian government.
Now, McFaul is one of 11 U.S. citizens a Russian prosecutor wants to question in connection with an investigation many U.S. officials say is bogus. The list is believed to include at least two other former diplomats, a congressional staffer, a CIA agent, a staffer for the National Security Council and two employees at the Department of Homeland Security.
The State Department has called the request for the Americans “absolutely absurd,” and the White House said Thursday that President Trump “disagreed” with the idea after initially declining to rule it out. The Senate voted 98 to 0 for a resolution calling on the administration to refuse to make any officials available to Russia for interrogation.
What began as Trump’s attempt to repair relations that had been deteriorating since the Obama administration ended up causing a bigger rift.
The fact he had even considered making Americans submit to questioning by Russian authorities sowed suspicion and outrage among current and former diplomats.
Russian President Vladimir Putin raised the issue when he met Trump in Finland this week, days after the Justice Department indicted 12 Russian military officers suspected of interfering in the 2016 U.S. election. Trump initially called the offer “interesting.”
“It’s flabbergasting why the White House did not shut this down immediately,” said Nicholas Burns, a former undersecretary of state for political affairs. “The president should have said at the news conference that he would not go along with this.”...
This is a mob. This is how mobs work. Now with Putin coming to the U.S since 2007 is a new era... Republicans also now denied the interpreter for Putin and Trump. And they also blocked a measure on funding from foreign attacks on our election. Party over country. These are not republicans anymore.
https://mobile.twitter.com/thebaxterbean/status/1019986680793698312?s=21
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b50b75de4b0de86f48ac6d5
Oh Nunes... how has this country forsaken you.
|
On July 20 2018 13:11 Kyadytim wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 12:58 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 12:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:On July 20 2018 11:19 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 09:56 Biff The Understudy wrote:On July 20 2018 07:19 On_Slaught wrote:On July 20 2018 07:14 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 07:04 TheTenthDoc wrote: Is it really gaslighting if you believe the things you're saying that are making people question their own grasp on reality?
Also, I'm not sure how what Trump is doing could be described as gaslighting because he's not making anyone believe anything things happened that didn't happen and nobody is questioning their own sanity, but nobody seems to use terms correctly anyway so. You don't think that his announcing today that Putin was coming to the White House this fall was gaslighting? He is deliberately trolling the media and the opposition. Was he trolling when he said he'd consider handing over ex-diplomats for interrogation? We really going to just chalk his bad ideas up to 3d chess? Seems just as likely, if not more likely, that he is just and idiot who says and does stupid things. Also, how is the President trolling the press, if that is what it is, in any way appropriate? It’s gonna take a long time for Dauntless to admit he elected a complete and utter moron to the White House, that’s all there is to it. People who voted for this clown hold on to the idea he is « trolling » or whatever because of what the fact they enthusiastically supported such a giant, incompetent c... says about them. Far from it. Trump is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. Hell, he is acting more conservative than the fools on Capitol Hill. Earlier today, I saw an article (I think it was from The Hill) that discussed how Trump was unhappy with how the GOP refused to cut as much funding from various administrative agencies as Trump had requested. It is shit like that which makes congressional republicans so despised among the base. Edit: Here is an article talking about it. Even at the costs of others lives and well being, you're standing by this guy? Like whom? Hi. You might remember a couple of months ago I brought up how repealing the ACA without a robust replacement would literally kill me. That hasn't changed, but since then (in early July), the Trump administration has continued to undermine the ACA without any replacement plan by putting a hold on the risk adjustment transfers and cut funding for the enrollment assistance referred to as navigators again. But we could also go back to discussing the kids in cages, the kids who weren't bathed for months, the kids who are attending their own hearings at one year old, and such if you'd rather focus on that avenue of harm.
I think you're confusing this guy for someone who actually wanted an answer to the question he asked...
The kind of delusion it takes to not even acknowledge the people that died in Puerto Rico due to incompetence, all the ACA sabotage, people literally died on planes when they tried to restrict flights for the muslim ban, people coming to our country legally for asylum and being turned away to die in their country... it's hard to comprehend how far you have to stick your head in the sand to not see anything that's happening...
This guy is literally angry that Trump didn't cut enough funding and thinks that's the bad part of the tax plan... The statement someone made about "You're basically gonna get a free costco membership each year (for the years you will get a cut) from the tax cut" was hand crafted for people like this...
The kind of people that won't at all be able to tell how bad they got fucked in the a$$, but as long as someone tells them they're not getting fucked in the a$$ they'll believe it, because they want to believe it.
All this is basically a hail mary by scared white people (yes I'm white, I know white people because I am one) who are deathly afraid of being a minority, or old rich white people clinging to power.
|
On July 20 2018 15:09 ShoCkeyy wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/putin-appears-to-be-targeting-us-officials-who-worked-to-sanction-russia/2018/07/19/289059ac-8b67-11e8-8aea-86e88ae760d8_story.htmlShow nested quote +Almost from the day he arrived in Moscow as the U.S. ambassador in 2012, Michael McFaul and his family were subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment.
According to McFaul’s book “From Cold War to Hot Peace,” Russian authorities followed him to his son’s soccer game and on outings to McDonald’s. They trailed his children’s bus to school and sat behind the family at church. They slashed the tires of an embassy staffer’s car and broke into the homes of other employees.
Embassy security officials advised McFaul there was only one secure room at the embassy he and his wife should use if they ever quarreled because everywhere else was monitored by the Russian government.
Now, McFaul is one of 11 U.S. citizens a Russian prosecutor wants to question in connection with an investigation many U.S. officials say is bogus. The list is believed to include at least two other former diplomats, a congressional staffer, a CIA agent, a staffer for the National Security Council and two employees at the Department of Homeland Security.
The State Department has called the request for the Americans “absolutely absurd,” and the White House said Thursday that President Trump “disagreed” with the idea after initially declining to rule it out. The Senate voted 98 to 0 for a resolution calling on the administration to refuse to make any officials available to Russia for interrogation.
What began as Trump’s attempt to repair relations that had been deteriorating since the Obama administration ended up causing a bigger rift.
The fact he had even considered making Americans submit to questioning by Russian authorities sowed suspicion and outrage among current and former diplomats.
Russian President Vladimir Putin raised the issue when he met Trump in Finland this week, days after the Justice Department indicted 12 Russian military officers suspected of interfering in the 2016 U.S. election. Trump initially called the offer “interesting.”
“It’s flabbergasting why the White House did not shut this down immediately,” said Nicholas Burns, a former undersecretary of state for political affairs. “The president should have said at the news conference that he would not go along with this.”...
This is a mob. This is how mobs work. Now with Putin coming to the U.S since 2007 is a new era... Republicans also now denied the interpreter for Putin and Trump. And they also blocked a measure on funding from foreign attacks on our election. Party over country. These are not republicans anymore. https://mobile.twitter.com/thebaxterbean/status/1019986680793698312?s=21https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b50b75de4b0de86f48ac6d5Oh Nunes... how has this country forsaken you.
First, $380 million has already been granted this year. You know what the problem was? The states don't care enough. Most states take forever to even ask for it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/house-gop-refuses-to-renew-election-security-funding-as-democrats-fume-over-russian-meddling/2018/07/18/20761f88-8abb-11e8-8aea-86e88ae760d8_story.html?
http://www.kcra.com/article/investigation-election-security-vote-midterm-elections/22220096
From the above article:
[The EAC] just handed out $380 million to states to strengthen their voting systems. But nearly 70 percent of the states waited more than two months to ask for the money, a Hearst Television review of EAC data found. Now that the last state, Maine, requested it Friday, July 13, there’s no requirement they spend it to protect November’s midterm elections…
As of July 13, just 18 of the 50 states have asked DHS for free “risk and vulnerability” cyber assessments. States could also choose to hire private companies or do it in-house.
And only about half of state elections officials eligible for permanent security clearances from the federal government have them. They need that clearance to receive ongoing classified information about threats.
As to the interpreter... what makes them think they could even get her? Seems like an executive privilege conflict waiting to happen, and prob not one the House would win. And for what, Schiff's lame ass excuse?
The panel’s top Democrat, Rep. Adam Schiff, said Thursday he wanted the State Department interpreter to appear in closed session, saying Congress must “find out what was said” during the two-hour meeting.
The California lawmaker says he realizes it’s an “extraordinary” step to subpoena the interpreter, but it’s also extraordinary for the president to meet alone with a U.S. adversary.
All these unserious political stunts and it's the end of the world.
|
On July 20 2018 07:10 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 06:19 zlefin wrote:On July 20 2018 06:15 Sermokala wrote: Theres a list of things that Trump has done that has been proven that Democrats could be trotting out and talking about instead of anything to do with russia. When he talked about immigration they could have brought up his properties off shore that are routinely used by drug cartels to launder money. When he talked about how sanctuary cities were bad they could have brough up his red lining conviction.
But instead they go for Russia which isn't getting any real traction and burns slower then a sented candle. Its hysteria to continue to go on about Russia. you're using the wrong word; that's not "hysteria" that's "poor strategy" or "stupid". also, to what extent are the Dems heavily going after russia and not mentioning all those other things? it seems like I hear more Republicans saying that's what Dems do than Dems actually doing it themselves. It would be poor strategy or stupid if it was controlled in any way. Instead we get calls for impeachment every other development that everyone knows will go no where. We get predictions that muller will be fired in the week every single week. People even in this thread talk about civil war and a military coup to take trump out of power. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/opinions/americans-are-right-to-wonder-if-great-experiment-has-failed-richardson/index.htmlThis article by cnn is questioning if "the great experiment" of america has failed. They're talking about how america might be a failed state. If thats not hysterics you need to check yourself in.
Have you actually read the article? All it posits is that America is rapidly becoming an Oligarchy, not a democracy, which is self-evidently true given everyone in this thread knows America is run by the billionaire donors far more than the politicians, who mostly represent the interests of those donors and not the people.
Even the Democrats here openly state their own party works for the donors first.
In other words, the article is pretty much just putting what people in this thread think - and I'm guessing is a regular talking point throughout America - in fancier language.
As for America being a failed state... well, you've gone on a long journey from 'bring us your unwashed masses' to 'lock children up in cages and don't wash them'.
It's also why Plansix is ceaseless in saying you need to get the money out of politics. So long as it costs billions upon billions of dollars to run a successful Presidential campaign, the billionaires are the ones who have the power.
|
On July 20 2018 07:10 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 06:19 zlefin wrote:On July 20 2018 06:15 Sermokala wrote: Theres a list of things that Trump has done that has been proven that Democrats could be trotting out and talking about instead of anything to do with russia. When he talked about immigration they could have brought up his properties off shore that are routinely used by drug cartels to launder money. When he talked about how sanctuary cities were bad they could have brough up his red lining conviction.
But instead they go for Russia which isn't getting any real traction and burns slower then a sented candle. Its hysteria to continue to go on about Russia. you're using the wrong word; that's not "hysteria" that's "poor strategy" or "stupid". also, to what extent are the Dems heavily going after russia and not mentioning all those other things? it seems like I hear more Republicans saying that's what Dems do than Dems actually doing it themselves. It would be poor strategy or stupid if it was controlled in any way. Instead we get calls for impeachment every other development that everyone knows will go no where. We get predictions that muller will be fired in the week every single week. People even in this thread talk about civil war and a military coup to take trump out of power. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/opinions/americans-are-right-to-wonder-if-great-experiment-has-failed-richardson/index.htmlThis article by cnn is questioning if "the great experiment" of america has failed. They're talking about how america might be a failed state. If thats not hysterics you need to check yourself in. Yawn at dismissing academic speculation over whether the election of Trump means democracy has failed in America as hysteria. Entirely valid question to consider given the myriad other ways democracy appears to be faltering - Trump is just the most prominent example right now.
|
On July 20 2018 18:24 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 07:10 Sermokala wrote:On July 20 2018 06:19 zlefin wrote:On July 20 2018 06:15 Sermokala wrote: Theres a list of things that Trump has done that has been proven that Democrats could be trotting out and talking about instead of anything to do with russia. When he talked about immigration they could have brought up his properties off shore that are routinely used by drug cartels to launder money. When he talked about how sanctuary cities were bad they could have brough up his red lining conviction.
But instead they go for Russia which isn't getting any real traction and burns slower then a sented candle. Its hysteria to continue to go on about Russia. you're using the wrong word; that's not "hysteria" that's "poor strategy" or "stupid". also, to what extent are the Dems heavily going after russia and not mentioning all those other things? it seems like I hear more Republicans saying that's what Dems do than Dems actually doing it themselves. It would be poor strategy or stupid if it was controlled in any way. Instead we get calls for impeachment every other development that everyone knows will go no where. We get predictions that muller will be fired in the week every single week. People even in this thread talk about civil war and a military coup to take trump out of power. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/opinions/americans-are-right-to-wonder-if-great-experiment-has-failed-richardson/index.htmlThis article by cnn is questioning if "the great experiment" of america has failed. They're talking about how america might be a failed state. If thats not hysterics you need to check yourself in. Yawn at dismissing academic speculation over whether the election of Trump means democracy has failed in America as hysteria. Entirely valid question to consider given the myriad other ways democracy appears to be faltering - Trump is just the most prominent example right now.
US democracy failed in 2000. Now it's just provably very far past the point of mere failure.
|
He has no idea what he's doing, imagine slapping a tariff on every single imported good. The stock market would have to halt trading in order to avoid a complete meltdown. Also notice he has yet to order his Admin or the GOP to push legislation to modernize factories, and push for investments to replace imported goods with US made goods.
President Donald Trump has indicated that he is willing to slap tariffs on every Chinese good imported to the U.S. should the need arise.
"I'm ready to go to 500," the president told CNBC's Joe Kernen in a "Squawk Box" interview.
The reference is to the dollar amount of Chinese imports the U.S. accepted in 2017 — $505.5 billion to be exact, compared to the $129.9 billion the U.S. exported to China, according to Census Bureau data.
Thus far in the burgeoning trade war, the U.S. has slapped tariffs on just $34 billion of Chinese products, which China met with retaliatory duties.
By sheer dollar volume, the Chinese won't be able to come close to the U.S. in a tit-for-tat battle. Trump's comments point to a willingness to push the envelope as far as the U.S. needs to get Chinese tariff concessions, along with a pledge to stop stealing American technology.
"I'm not doing this for politics, I'm doing this to do the right thing for our country," Trump said. "We have been ripped off by China for a long time."
Trump said the U.S. is "being taken advantage of" on a number of fronts, including trade and monetary policy. Yet he said he has not pushed the tariffs out of any ill will towards China.
"I don't want them to be scared. I want them to do well," he said. "I really like President Xi a lot, but it was very unfair."
Trump also said he was told by unspecified Chinese officials that "nobody would ever complain" from past administrations "until you came along — me. They said, 'Now you're more than complaining. We don't like what you're doing.'"
Source
|
Well, Trump is correct in the last part (If he didn't make the "chinese official" up of course). Where he is incorrect is in interpreting that as him being way smarter than previous administrations and thinking outside of the box. While the way simpler way to see this situation is that he is simply complaining about really stupid shit he doesn't understand, and doing silly stuff because of that.
|
On July 20 2018 12:56 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 12:41 CorsairHero wrote:On July 20 2018 11:19 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 09:56 Biff The Understudy wrote:On July 20 2018 07:19 On_Slaught wrote:On July 20 2018 07:14 xDaunt wrote:On July 20 2018 07:04 TheTenthDoc wrote: Is it really gaslighting if you believe the things you're saying that are making people question their own grasp on reality?
Also, I'm not sure how what Trump is doing could be described as gaslighting because he's not making anyone believe anything things happened that didn't happen and nobody is questioning their own sanity, but nobody seems to use terms correctly anyway so. You don't think that his announcing today that Putin was coming to the White House this fall was gaslighting? He is deliberately trolling the media and the opposition. Was he trolling when he said he'd consider handing over ex-diplomats for interrogation? We really going to just chalk his bad ideas up to 3d chess? Seems just as likely, if not more likely, that he is just and idiot who says and does stupid things. Also, how is the President trolling the press, if that is what it is, in any way appropriate? It’s gonna take a long time for Dauntless to admit he elected a complete and utter moron to the White House, that’s all there is to it. People who voted for this clown hold on to the idea he is « trolling » or whatever because of what the fact they enthusiastically supported such a giant, incompetent c... says about them. Far from it. Trump is doing exactly what I voted for him to do. Hell, he is acting more conservative than the fools on Capitol Hill. Earlier today, I saw an article (I think it was from The Hill) that discussed how Trump was unhappy with how the GOP refused to cut as much funding from various administrative agencies as Trump had requested. It is shit like that which makes congressional republicans so despised among the base. Edit: Here is an article talking about it. Trump is so conservative he added a trillion to the debt. But sure, 2 billion in cuts to the EPA catches your eye. Presidents don’t draft budgets. Trump didn’t want what the GOP gave him, but they forced him to sign it or face a shut down. He also signed the tax cut too. He could have just vetoed the tax cut, knowing that they don’t have the votes to slash the budget.
|
|
|
On July 20 2018 20:49 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 18:24 kollin wrote:On July 20 2018 07:10 Sermokala wrote:On July 20 2018 06:19 zlefin wrote:On July 20 2018 06:15 Sermokala wrote: Theres a list of things that Trump has done that has been proven that Democrats could be trotting out and talking about instead of anything to do with russia. When he talked about immigration they could have brought up his properties off shore that are routinely used by drug cartels to launder money. When he talked about how sanctuary cities were bad they could have brough up his red lining conviction.
But instead they go for Russia which isn't getting any real traction and burns slower then a sented candle. Its hysteria to continue to go on about Russia. you're using the wrong word; that's not "hysteria" that's "poor strategy" or "stupid". also, to what extent are the Dems heavily going after russia and not mentioning all those other things? it seems like I hear more Republicans saying that's what Dems do than Dems actually doing it themselves. It would be poor strategy or stupid if it was controlled in any way. Instead we get calls for impeachment every other development that everyone knows will go no where. We get predictions that muller will be fired in the week every single week. People even in this thread talk about civil war and a military coup to take trump out of power. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/opinions/americans-are-right-to-wonder-if-great-experiment-has-failed-richardson/index.htmlThis article by cnn is questioning if "the great experiment" of america has failed. They're talking about how america might be a failed state. If thats not hysterics you need to check yourself in. Yawn at dismissing academic speculation over whether the election of Trump means democracy has failed in America as hysteria. Entirely valid question to consider given the myriad other ways democracy appears to be faltering - Trump is just the most prominent example right now. US democracy failed in 2000. Now it's just provably very far past the point of mere failure. The interesting part of the debate is that we can't really know whether this is just a mid life crisis or terminal disease. One of the defining features of strong democracies appear to be their ability for self-correction, and regular function in the face of great duress - US presidential elections continuing throughout WW2 is an example of this. Whether the damage Trump wreaks on democratic institutions and norms is fatal or not is something we won't know until irs too late, but it's fun to speculate!
|
On July 20 2018 22:59 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 20:49 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:On July 20 2018 18:24 kollin wrote:On July 20 2018 07:10 Sermokala wrote:On July 20 2018 06:19 zlefin wrote:On July 20 2018 06:15 Sermokala wrote: Theres a list of things that Trump has done that has been proven that Democrats could be trotting out and talking about instead of anything to do with russia. When he talked about immigration they could have brought up his properties off shore that are routinely used by drug cartels to launder money. When he talked about how sanctuary cities were bad they could have brough up his red lining conviction.
But instead they go for Russia which isn't getting any real traction and burns slower then a sented candle. Its hysteria to continue to go on about Russia. you're using the wrong word; that's not "hysteria" that's "poor strategy" or "stupid". also, to what extent are the Dems heavily going after russia and not mentioning all those other things? it seems like I hear more Republicans saying that's what Dems do than Dems actually doing it themselves. It would be poor strategy or stupid if it was controlled in any way. Instead we get calls for impeachment every other development that everyone knows will go no where. We get predictions that muller will be fired in the week every single week. People even in this thread talk about civil war and a military coup to take trump out of power. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/opinions/americans-are-right-to-wonder-if-great-experiment-has-failed-richardson/index.htmlThis article by cnn is questioning if "the great experiment" of america has failed. They're talking about how america might be a failed state. If thats not hysterics you need to check yourself in. Yawn at dismissing academic speculation over whether the election of Trump means democracy has failed in America as hysteria. Entirely valid question to consider given the myriad other ways democracy appears to be faltering - Trump is just the most prominent example right now. US democracy failed in 2000. Now it's just provably very far past the point of mere failure. The interesting part of the debate is that we can't really know whether this is just a mid life crisis or terminal disease. One of the defining features of strong democracies appear to be their ability for self-correction, and regular function in the face of great duress - US presidential elections continuing throughout WW2 is an example of this. Whether the damage Trump wreaks on democratic institutions and norms is fatal or not is something we won't know until irs too late, but it's fun to speculate!
Does it have much to do with Trump, though?
-You have a system for regulated corruption built into the presidental elections through the big donations. -Electorial college... wtf is the point with that in 2018? -The way congressmen and senators are elected differs WIDELY from how the population vote through an awful and outdated voting system. -The same awful voting system makes sure you have only 2 parties while you should really have at least 6. -The problem with the senators especially will get even worse, as even more people move to the big cities on the coasts. -You allow Gerrymandering, which is incredible to outsiders. -It is not a secret that big coorporations and organisations can easily buy inflence in Washington. -Unions are surpressed, and workerrights are under constant fire.
But the ones benefitting from status quo are also the ones who can change it, so I have no idea how your country could ever improve as a democracy. Maybe if rich, populated states on the coast threaten to leave the US because they had enough of the misrepresentation and corrupt policies?
|
On July 20 2018 23:50 Slydie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2018 22:59 kollin wrote:On July 20 2018 20:49 Ciaus_Dronu wrote:On July 20 2018 18:24 kollin wrote:On July 20 2018 07:10 Sermokala wrote:On July 20 2018 06:19 zlefin wrote:On July 20 2018 06:15 Sermokala wrote: Theres a list of things that Trump has done that has been proven that Democrats could be trotting out and talking about instead of anything to do with russia. When he talked about immigration they could have brought up his properties off shore that are routinely used by drug cartels to launder money. When he talked about how sanctuary cities were bad they could have brough up his red lining conviction.
But instead they go for Russia which isn't getting any real traction and burns slower then a sented candle. Its hysteria to continue to go on about Russia. you're using the wrong word; that's not "hysteria" that's "poor strategy" or "stupid". also, to what extent are the Dems heavily going after russia and not mentioning all those other things? it seems like I hear more Republicans saying that's what Dems do than Dems actually doing it themselves. It would be poor strategy or stupid if it was controlled in any way. Instead we get calls for impeachment every other development that everyone knows will go no where. We get predictions that muller will be fired in the week every single week. People even in this thread talk about civil war and a military coup to take trump out of power. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/19/opinions/americans-are-right-to-wonder-if-great-experiment-has-failed-richardson/index.htmlThis article by cnn is questioning if "the great experiment" of america has failed. They're talking about how america might be a failed state. If thats not hysterics you need to check yourself in. Yawn at dismissing academic speculation over whether the election of Trump means democracy has failed in America as hysteria. Entirely valid question to consider given the myriad other ways democracy appears to be faltering - Trump is just the most prominent example right now. US democracy failed in 2000. Now it's just provably very far past the point of mere failure. The interesting part of the debate is that we can't really know whether this is just a mid life crisis or terminal disease. One of the defining features of strong democracies appear to be their ability for self-correction, and regular function in the face of great duress - US presidential elections continuing throughout WW2 is an example of this. Whether the damage Trump wreaks on democratic institutions and norms is fatal or not is something we won't know until irs too late, but it's fun to speculate! Does it have much to do with Trump, though? -You have a system for regulated corruption built into the presidental elections through the big donations. -Electorial college... wtf is the point with that in 2018? - The way congressmen and senators are elected differs WIDELY from how the population vote through an awful and outdated voting system.-The same awful voting system makes sure you have only 2 parties while you should really have at least 6. -The problem with the senators especially will get even worse, as even more people move to the big cities on the coasts. -You allow Gerrymandering, which is incredible to outsiders. -It is not a secret that big coorporations and organisations can easily buy inflence in Washington. -Unions are surpressed, and workerrights are under constant fire. But the ones benefitting from status quo are also the ones who can change it, so I have no idea how your country could ever improve as a democracy. Maybe if rich, populated states on the coast threaten to leave the US because they had enough of the misrepresentation and corrupt policies?
I do love it when the people not from America come in and tell us how dumb our nation of state system is. Its like they miss the part where we have 51 governments, not 1 goverment.
-The way congressmen and senators are elected differs WIDELY from how the population vote through an awful and outdated voting system.
By popular vote?
-The same awful voting system makes sure you have only 2 parties while you should really have at least 6.
That has nothing to do with our voting system itself, but that the executive branch exists and is designed to represent the country as a whole. Every other section of government is settled by popular vote.
|
|
|
|