EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 4803
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1846 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28554 Posts
This point of view has, among the far left, evolved in two major ways the past few years: Firstly, a lot of people who used to be opposed to NATO became positively inclined once Russia invaded Ukraine. Indeed, the Socialist Left party of Norway - which originally branched out of the Labor party because they did not want Norway to be part of NATO while the governing Labor party did - officially changed stance in 2023, and no longer had 'Norway should aim to leave NATO' as part of their program after that. Part of this change was because they saw Russia as a bigger threat than they had ever seen the USSR (Norway actually had reasonable grounds to not fear the USSR, unlike eastern europe: After the Soviet Union helped liberate Norway from the nazis, they actually withdrew all troops voluntarily, unlike the eastern europe where they became a new occupying force), and part of the change was that the third option - joint defense with Sweden and Finland was no longer a viable option with Sweden and Finland joining NATO. Then, many Norwegians (seemingly, more than what used to be the case before the Russian invasion in the first place) have started questioning the whole alliance following Trump's statements, because they don't want to be allied with an extorting mafia fascist regime. Now, there seems to be more support of a joint European defense without American involvement, and also, slightly growing support towards joining the EU. | ||
|
KT_Elwood
696 Posts
- Weapon delievery to ukraine or budget for domestic production for ukraine - New defense budgets for german miltary. They are still a big party/org and having their own spectrum.. but I still don't understand the leftists stance with dictators, homophobes, misogynists just because they are from moscow or are pretending to be "good muslims" - while bashing every white boomer who has misgenderd a non binary person once per email as being "hateful". They always came across as cringy non-conformists that want to upset only those people who wouldn't mind their positions if they were a little more moderate about it, but are super tame to "victims" of circumstance like cultures that traditionally treat women like house elfs. New leadership is indeed more based. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43770 Posts
On February 26 2025 04:25 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Trump and Republicans had promised that they wouldn't try to make cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. In the least surprising move of all time, Trump and Republicans lied, and they've proposed a budget that cuts nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid: https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2025/02/25/medicaid-cuts-threaten-a-key-house-vote-on-trumps-agenda-today-heres-why-the-gop-is-divided/ Update: Despite 100% of Democrats voting to save Medicaid, the Republicans were still able to pass the budget that destroys it. That's what happens when Congressional Republicans are the majority. It took just one month for this to happen; I wonder how much longer until Medicare and Social Security are attacked. | ||
|
Uldridge
Belgium4565 Posts
| ||
|
EnDeR_
Spain2543 Posts
On February 26 2025 19:14 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Update: Despite 100% of Democrats voting to save Medicaid, the Republicans were still able to pass the budget that destroys it. That's what happens when Congressional Republicans are the majority. It took just one month for this to happen; I wonder how much longer until Medicare and Social Security are attacked. But, you know, the Dems just didn't do enough to earn people's votes. Clearly, handing Trump all branches of the executive was a preferable outcome. | ||
|
EnDeR_
Spain2543 Posts
On February 26 2025 19:24 Uldridge wrote: If I understand correctly, you only need 51/49 to make things happen in US congress, right? The rules are fairly opaque, they're using a budget reconciliation process which allows them to bypass the filibuster. Not that any of it makes any sense. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States22675 Posts
On February 26 2025 19:24 Uldridge wrote: If I understand correctly, you only need 51/49 to make things happen in US congress, right? LibHorizons: The vote DPB is talking about was in the House 217-215 (1 Republican defector) so that they could be a step closer to passing the budget through reconciliation which only requires 51/50 (VP to break tie). To do it they had promise to make $2 trillion in spending cuts, but they didn't actually commit to where those cuts would be from. Now they have to get the Senate to agree to the same legislation. Collins and Hawley did vote for an amendment to block tax cuts if Medicaid funding was cut, but it failed. That said, Senators are much less likely to be willing to cut medicaid. While it isn't explicit in the legislation yet, there's not really anywhere else for the cuts to come from. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States22675 Posts
On February 26 2025 21:00 EnDeR_ wrote: But, you know, the Dems just didn't do enough to earn people's votes. Clearly, handing Trump all branches of the executive was a preferable outcome. LibHorizons: I know people are still upset about the 2024 election, but it's over. What are we/Dems doing to fix the problem of Trump having all branches NOW? What is Democrats' version of Project 2025? DPB mentioned possibly primarying Dems like Hakeem Jeffries and Dick Durbin, but hasn't followed through with the metrics we're using to determine who needs to be primaried or any remotely sensible strategy to do so. So it doesn't appear to be sincere. | ||
|
EnDeR_
Spain2543 Posts
On February 26 2025 21:22 GreenHorizons wrote: LibHorizons: I know people are still upset about the 2024 election, but it's over. What are we/Dems doing to fix the problem of Trump having all branches NOW? What is Democrats' version of Project 2025? DPB mentioned possibly primarying Dems like Hakeem Jeffries and Dick Durbin, but hasn't followed through with the metrics we're using to determine who needs to be primaried or any remotely sensible strategy to do so. So it doesn't appear to be sincere. GH, you can't fix it. They have them, the election is over, as you say, and elections have consequences, as Reps like to say. But sure, keep banging on how the Dems are terrible so Trump can keep them for the full term and do further damage. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21342 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35091 Posts
On February 26 2025 19:14 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Update: Despite 100% of Democrats voting to save Medicaid, the Republicans were still able to pass the budget that destroys it. That's what happens when Congressional Republicans are the majority. It took just one month for this to happen; I wonder how much longer until Medicare and Social Security are attacked. 30% of Medicaid dollars goes to Medicare recipients. In effect, it already has. | ||
| ||
