|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On May 27 2020 06:02 Artisreal wrote: you can add a couple of people burning to death in German prisons to that list as well. Though I suppose it's still incomparable in scale to the US
Yeah the innocent woman shot to death by police in her bed recently didn't even come up here iirc. Or the prisons with absurdly high infection rates of covid-19
|
On May 27 2020 06:02 Artisreal wrote: you can add a couple of people burning to death in German prisons to that list as well. Though I suppose it's still incomparable in scale to the US
What happened to the perpetrators?
|
On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud.
How he's not phased at all that the man stops moving, and keeps sitting on his neck for four minutes after. I just can't comprehend any train of thought, which would make that lead to a good outcome. What could the officer be thinking during it?
|
On May 27 2020 10:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud. Firing him and his enablers is only the first step. They used their badges as a shield to commit murder. It's a base perversion of law and order.
|
On May 27 2020 10:39 NewSunshine wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 10:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud. Firing him and his enablers is only the first step. They used their badges as a shield to commit murder. It's a base perversion of law and order.
Alternatively, it's exactly how law and order has been used in this country going back to the slave catchers and protectors of capital from which they started.
The police as most people imagine them didn't even start in the US until the ~1900's
For example, businessmen in the late 19th century had both connections to politicians and an image of the kinds of people most likely to go on strike and disrupt their workforce. So it’s no coincidence that by the late 1880s, all major U.S. cities had police forces. Fears of labor-union organizers and of large waves of Catholic, Irish, Italian, German, and Eastern European immigrants, who looked and acted differently from the people who had dominated cities before, drove the call for the preservation of law and order, or at least the version of it promoted by dominant interests. For example, people who drank at taverns rather than at home were seen as “dangerous” people by others, but they might have pointed out other factors such as how living in a smaller home makes drinking in a tavern more appealing. (The irony of this logic, Potter points out, is that the businessmen who maintained this belief were often the ones who profited off of the commercial sale of alcohol in public places.)
At the same time, the late 19th century was the era of political machines, so police captains and sergeants for each precinct were often picked by the local political party ward leader, who often owned taverns or ran street gangs that intimidated voters. They then were able to use police to harass opponents of that particular political party, or provide payoffs for officers to turn a blind eye to allow illegal drinking, gambling and prostitution.
This situation was exacerbated during Prohibition, leading President Hoover to appoint the Wickersham Commission in 1929 to investigate the ineffectiveness of law enforcement nationwide. To make police independent from political party ward leaders, the map of police precincts was changed so that they would not correspond with political wards.
The drive to professionalize the police followed, which means that the concept of a career cop as we’d recognize it today is less than a century old.
Forgot the part about the south:
In the South, however, the economics that drove the creation of police forces were centered not on the protection of shipping interests but on the preservation of the slavery system. Some of the primary policing institutions there were the slave patrols tasked with chasing down runaways and preventing slave revolts, Potter says; the first formal slave patrol had been created in the Carolina colonies in 1704. During the Civil War, the military became the primary form of law enforcement in the South, but during Reconstruction, many local sheriffs functioned in a way analogous to the earlier slave patrols, enforcing segregation and the disenfranchisement of freed slaves.
time.com
|
On May 27 2020 10:39 NewSunshine wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 10:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud. Firing him and his enablers is only the first step. They used their badges as a shield to commit murder. It's a base perversion of law and order. Hopefully there is enough outcry and demonstrations that they get civil charges, if not criminal, brought against them. But if we've learned anything from Eric Garner, it probably won't happen.
|
On May 27 2020 11:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 10:39 NewSunshine wrote:On May 27 2020 10:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud. Firing him and his enablers is only the first step. They used their badges as a shield to commit murder. It's a base perversion of law and order. Hopefully there is enough outcry and demonstrations that they get civil charges, if not criminal, brought against them. But if we've learned anything from Eric Garner, it probably won't happen.
The American justice system is loath to ever punish cops. Protection from consequence always leads to corruption. Always.
|
On May 27 2020 11:43 iamthedave wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 11:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:On May 27 2020 10:39 NewSunshine wrote:On May 27 2020 10:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud. Firing him and his enablers is only the first step. They used their badges as a shield to commit murder. It's a base perversion of law and order. Hopefully there is enough outcry and demonstrations that they get civil charges, if not criminal, brought against them. But if we've learned anything from Eric Garner, it probably won't happen. The American justice system is loath to ever punish cops. Protection from consequence always leads to corruption. Always. I'd say they don't punish them in accordance with the laws that they punish everyone else. They suspend them with pay or allow them to retire or transfer out to a different city/department. That all needs to change before anything meaningful will take place.
In a side note, twitter is now "fact checking" trump's rants and telling people who follow him to look elsewhere for the truth. I wonder what will happen now. They won't/can't ban him from using the service since he's the president. But I wonder if he's not re-elected, will they ban him...
|
I know very little about how law works but i wonder why people cannot directly sue police officers for damages caused by gross incompetence (I am being generous in this case)? That might make them act less recklessly.
|
On May 27 2020 11:43 iamthedave wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 11:21 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:On May 27 2020 10:39 NewSunshine wrote:On May 27 2020 10:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:On May 27 2020 02:54 Dan HH wrote: I watched the video of the Minneapolis cop suffocating a handcuffed man to death for no reason other than to spite the bystanders and it fucked up my evening.. Insanity... the officer killed the man in cold blood, rolled his corpse in an ambulance and walks off proud. Firing him and his enablers is only the first step. They used their badges as a shield to commit murder. It's a base perversion of law and order. Hopefully there is enough outcry and demonstrations that they get civil charges, if not criminal, brought against them. But if we've learned anything from Eric Garner, it probably won't happen. The American justice system is loath to ever punish cops. Protection from consequence always leads to corruption. Always. From what I've understood, the justice system needs the cops. If they go on one of them, the cops stop cooperating and everything grinds to a halt. So they just give up ever prosecuting police officers out of pragmatism. It's really fucked up.
|
More or less what Biff said. They've built a sense of "untouchable" within the ranks, so they know what they can and can't get away with. The biggest difference is that they're getting caught on film these days. This isn't new in certain communities.
Instead of disbanding the police force as an institution as some would have you think is the only reasonable step, there needs to be 1) an independent force investigating police misconduct (typically internal affairs but that's probably corrupted wholesale as well). 2) a "cancel culture" on judges, prosecutors, and AGs that refuse to hold any of them responsible, and 3) a complete rewrite and retraining of all police.
I'd start with 3 before going any further.
|
On May 27 2020 09:48 iamthedave wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2020 06:02 Artisreal wrote: you can add a couple of people burning to death in German prisons to that list as well. Though I suppose it's still incomparable in scale to the US
What happened to the perpetrators? Possibly the most famous case is the death of Oury Jalloh, who burned to death in a cell, tied to his bed. Short excerpt from wiki:
Wikipedia says: Oury Jalloh (born 1968 in Kabala, Sierra Leone;[1] died 7 January 2005 in Dessau, Germany) was an asylum seeker who died in a fire in a police cell in Dessau, Germany. The hands and feet of Jalloh, who was alone in the cell, were tied to a mattress. A fire alarm went off, but was initially turned off without further action by an officer. The case caused national and international outrage.
Police / prison officers responsible for his safety and the ignored fire alarm were judged not guilty. After it surfaced recently that he'd possibly been totured and unconscious before, idk how to say this, catching fire (?). He could also already have been dead already. His brother and activists wanted to revisit the case due to that new evidence. It got denied by court. Arbitratily some say. Oh, and the mattress was fireproof.
Then there was a Syrian - Amad A. - in solitary confinement who's cell caught on fire and he died from the injuries sustained. iirc he told the prison councillor / guards that he had suicidal thoughts for being falsely imprisoned. Though as he was to be released about a month later anyway, it's questionable whether he'd really burn himself. The offical story is that he was the arson.
Turns out, he was actually falsely imprisoned because a wanted thief gave Amad's name as an alias. On the warrant it was marked that Amad was an alias and not the real name. This was removed a couple of days after the arrest by the arresting officers. They were informed by phone that the person they imprisoned was innocent. They didn't give a shit and did nothing. Even omitted the phone call during the first trial which ended with acquittal. Luckily these facts have surfaced now thanks to a new report and - fingers crossed - they will be brought to justice.
|
Footage of some of the protests over the killing of George Floyd by police. It is demonstrative of the kind of mass direct action required to get the minimal level of accountability we've seen thus far and will have to continue if there is to be any more imo.
Some photos
+ Show Spoiler +
I obviously have no faith the FBI is going to make this better when the inevitable calls for calm and forgiveness come.
|
Meanwhile Trump threatening to shut down twitter because free speech is threatening his election. He wants you to get your news from his state-funded self-advertising shows. If that happens, you'll only see what you need to believe.
|
Seeing the protests is encouraging. In general I'm starting to see a resurgence in people finally calling out a lot of heinous and dangerous things for what they are. It's still not enough, but it's been a long time coming nonetheless. The police felt like they could get away with this. That needs to change.
On May 27 2020 22:37 Vivax wrote: Meanwhile Trump threatening to shut down twitter because free speech is threatening his election. He wants you to get your news from his state-funded self-advertising shows. If that happens, you'll only see what you need to believe. This obviously follows up on Twitter finally fact-checking our post-factuality president. Obviously the knee-jerk reaction of most Trumpers will be that Twitter is a deep state lefty conspiracy or some garbo like that, but it's still a big avenue they use to spread their nonsense and propaganda. This is the start of taking that away from them. It needs to keep going.
|
How is he going to shutdown the social networks? Is he gonna build a firewall for the MAGA crowd?
edit: the firewall just got 10 feet higher
|
I am still kind of confused how someone who is clearly an enemy to facts can be taken seriously by anyone.
The whole Trump presidency is just so absurd. It would be comedy if it weren't so sad and actively hurting people.
But if Trump starts a fight with the social networks, maybe this is finally the end of this. All his power stems from his cult of idiots who follow him on social networks. I think you couldn't have a worse president during a time of crisis.
|
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/IRYBYgB.png)
Time to pay respects to the last bastion of boots on the ground. The only reason I knew the outbreak was coming in January was because of twitter.
Black man gets murdered, vid shows up on twitter, protests commence, dictator aims to shut it down.
|
It's hard to say how I feel about the prospect of Trump no longer being on Twitter. All of his late night ramblings, misspellings, randomly capitalized words, covfefe, we wouldn't have any of it without his dumb ass taking to Twitter between Fox News segments. It would obviously be a good thing. But I feel like he wouldn't have as many opportunities to show how stupid he is anymore. The people have a right to know.
|
I think enough people know how much of a dumbass this president is. So it won't be a loss. It'll be a net gain if anything. People will still be talking about it/him on the platform, so there's that. And if he does leave, they should ban his account. I'm actually glad now he doesn't use the official POTUS handle.
|
|
|
|