• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:03
CEST 11:03
KST 18:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202543Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments4[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced62
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025) The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up Clem Interview: "PvT is a bit insane right now"
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments WardiTV Mondays RSL Season 2 Qualifier Links and Dates StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Global Tourney for College Students in September
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
StarCraft player reflex TE scores StarCon Philadelphia BW General Discussion Where is technical support? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 614 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1869

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 5142 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18828 Posts
October 25 2019 17:17 GMT
#37361
Yeah that sounds about right, slightly different orientation with practically the same effect
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-10-25 20:38:55
October 25 2019 20:38 GMT
#37362
If anyone was wondering like me what the hell 'the oil is secured' phrase means that Trump has been using for a while now in regards to Syria. It means the US will send tanks (and thus additional troops) into Syria to guard oil fields from ISIS... after leaving an ally who was fighting ISIS and guarding ISIS prisoners to 'bring the troops home'. This is becoming a really cynical foreign policy episode.

A senior Pentagon official told Newsweek Wednesday that the United States is seeking—pending White House approval—to deploy half of an Army armored brigade combat team battalion that includes as many as 30 Abrams tanks alongside personnel to eastern Syria, where lucrative oil fields are under the control of a mostly Kurdish force involved in the U.S.-led fight against the Islamic State militant group (ISIS). The Pentagon-backed militia, called the Syrian Democratic Forces and dominated by the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG), will continue to be involved in securing these oil fields, the official said.

source
Neosteel Enthusiast
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-10-25 21:20:21
October 25 2019 21:09 GMT
#37363
I wonder what the people here who were defending Trump's decision to betray the Syrian Kurds as "bringing back the boys" would say about this? But then again they were silent when Trump decided to decided the military are now mercenaries for Saudi Arabia.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15689 Posts
October 25 2019 22:57 GMT
#37364
My uncle loves describing himself as a centrist.

Replied to a Ben Shapiro video on Facebook praising him lol
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
October 26 2019 01:09 GMT
#37365
On October 26 2019 07:57 Mohdoo wrote:
My uncle loves describing himself as a centrist.

Replied to a Ben Shapiro video on Facebook praising him lol

Zuckerberg, clearly not enjoying the idea of a Warren or Bernie presidency, met personally with Ben Shapiro and others recently. I have a feeling more people will be suggested to view content by him.

Neosteel Enthusiast
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
October 26 2019 02:53 GMT
#37366
On October 25 2019 12:10 Doodsmack wrote:
Very big news here that the DOJ's probe of the Russian collusion investigation has become a criminal inquiry, at least in part, meaning that some minimal evidence of crime was found. Of course, committed partisans like this CNN pundit will disregard the probe out of hand. I suspect that the facts are going to come out one way or another, and if in fact there was malfeasance in the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, the facts will bear it out in a way that partisan arguments can't obfuscate.


3rd time a charm.

We need more investigations on the investigation. After all the Senate one didn't find anything, the one in progress before this hasn't found anything although it's not done. So obviously a 3rd probe will do it.
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
October 26 2019 03:01 GMT
#37367
On October 26 2019 10:09 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2019 07:57 Mohdoo wrote:
My uncle loves describing himself as a centrist.

Replied to a Ben Shapiro video on Facebook praising him lol

Zuckerberg, clearly not enjoying the idea of a Warren or Bernie presidency, met personally with Ben Shapiro and others recently. I have a feeling more people will be suggested to view content by him.


Related to this, the VP for Global Policy, VP for US Public Policy, and Public Policy Director for Global Elections in Facebook's DC office are all extensively tied to the Republican party.
Citation: popular.info
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-10-26 05:14:12
October 26 2019 04:13 GMT
#37368
On October 26 2019 11:53 semantics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2019 12:10 Doodsmack wrote:
Very big news here that the DOJ's probe of the Russian collusion investigation has become a criminal inquiry, at least in part, meaning that some minimal evidence of crime was found. Of course, committed partisans like this CNN pundit will disregard the probe out of hand. I suspect that the facts are going to come out one way or another, and if in fact there was malfeasance in the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, the facts will bear it out in a way that partisan arguments can't obfuscate.

https://twitter.com/eliehonig/status/1187526145488625666

3rd time a charm.

We need more investigations on the investigation. After all the Senate one didn't find anything, the one in progress before this hasn't found anything although it's not done. So obviously a 3rd probe will do it.

Then after this one doesn't find anything they will need to do an investigation of the investigation of the investigation to make sure that the people investigating the investigators weren't potentially breaking the law while investigating others potentially breaking the law while investigating. It's simple really.

On October 26 2019 01:21 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2019 12:19 Ben... wrote:
On October 25 2019 04:35 Mohdoo wrote:
On October 25 2019 04:21 farvacola wrote:
Mayor Pete suggested that his ideal SCOTUS candidates would be like Justices Kennedy and Souter.

That’s a no from me, dawg.


yeah, holy crap. I don't understand him. He is like /r/enlightenedcentrism in human form

It's crazy how much his campaign and rhetoric has changed. When he first started he was saying all the right things, had messaging that made sense, and had genuine support from both establishment Democrats and some progressives. Now he's painful to watch, his policy has turned into completely generic watered-down centrist Democrat stuff that commits to nothing, and he's as cringy as Andrew Yang to listen to now.

In other news, this stuff about Barr launching an official criminal investigation of the investigation of Russian interference of the 2016 election is genuinely concerning. Barr had appointed some prosecutor guy to do work on the issue, but nobody was agreeing to speak with him voluntarily, so now Barr made it official so the guy can subpoena people. The concern is that he's doing this to discourage others from investigating interference in the upcoming election, scare people away from speaking up about anything potentially bad, and of course, to be used as a way of slinging mud at opportune times during the next year or so.

It wouldn't be scary if he hadn't done literally everything possible to make himself completely untrustworthy. Not only that, he has been doing what genuinely appears to amount to chasing conspiracy theories for the last few months, and seems to be taking them seriously.

edit:
On October 25 2019 12:10 Doodsmack wrote:
Very big news here that the DOJ's probe of the Russian collusion investigation has become a criminal inquiry, at least in part, meaning that some minimal evidence of crime was found. Of course, committed partisans like this CNN pundit will disregard the probe out of hand. I suspect that the facts are going to come out one way or another, and if in fact there was malfeasance in the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, the facts will bear it out in a way that partisan arguments can't obfuscate.

It's Barr. Trust nothing. The facts won't bear out in a way that partisan arguments can't obfuscate because given Barr's history of leaving out key facts and context, he is likely to actually leave out any facts or information that doesn't support whatever he wants. He has a repeated history of doing this type of stuff, which is why people are freaking out. "Some minimal evidence" could be literally nothing with this guy. He once put out a summary memo of a legal opinion justifying the kidnapping of a foreign person without consent of the country they are in and claimed in the summary he had legal justification for his claims, but then when the actual text of the legal opinion came out it later on turned out his entire justification was that Barr thought it was fine that the president break international law to do kidnap people in other countries without consent of those countries, which went against pretty much every other opinion on the topic and caused the government to immediately distance itself from the legal opinion. He had no actual legal justification, and he had just happened to have left the most important part that blew his whole argument apart out of his memo. He did a similar thing when he left out key context in his memo on the Mueller report that made it sound like the report was much less damning than it actually was. There's good reason nobody trusts him.

Here's a pretty good article outlining what he did relating to his OLC opinion in the 1980s


I mean theres probably a good faith argument that international law can get "broken" in certain situations. Obama violated international law when he sent an assassin team into Pakistan to get OBL. He violated Pakistan's sovereignty without Pakistan's consent. Israel also violated international law when they kidnapped Eichmann in Brazil (and there was a lot of controversy at the time I believe). So I'm not sure it's the case that barr absolutely needed to say the US cant do it because of international law.

It's not the OLC opinion that is the issue. The issue is that when he was called to testify about the opinion he refused to provide the opinion while claiming that it was against department policy which was demonstrably not the case since other recent OLC opinions had been recently released. He instead offered to summarize the opinion, and in doing so left out several principal arguments of it regarding presidential actions, a UN charter, and certain aspects of international law, and when questioned on the opinion he indicated that everything he discussed was in the summary (as in, he indicated he didn't address the UN/international law aspect of the issue). His refusal to provide justification for his opinion that presidents could order the FBI to do these kidnappings and his behaviour had made those questioning him suspicious, so they ended up subpoenaing the opinion, only to find that he had been misleading. The differences between the summary and opinion eventually got leaked to the press, who then asked Bush Sr. and the AG about it.

Once legal experts got a hold of the opinion, it became clear why he didn't want it released since his arguments were considered to be not up to typical standards and failed to address common questions. He also took strange stances on issues that were different than the government's previous ones and made dangerous assumptions about how government worked. The thing with this opinion was that it reversed a previous OLC opinion that had only come out a few years prior, which immediately made people suspicious. The previous opinion had factored in international law, domestic law, and a UN charter and concluded against the US having the power to kidnap citizens of a country without permission of the country, since they considered it to essentially be an act of war. Keep in mind this was a very different time than post-9/11 US.

But that's not the point I suppose. The point is that Barr lied, or at the very least was deliberately misleading, about the contents of his opinion when questioned by congress, and left out information that would have substantially weakened his position on the issue. He has done this type of thing several times in the past, including this year.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
Starlightsun
Profile Blog Joined June 2016
United States1405 Posts
October 26 2019 05:03 GMT
#37369
Republicans railroading federal judges in... wtf

https://www.pbs.org/video/how-gop-efforts-to-reshape-federal-courts-could-affect-2020-1572043875/

User was warned for this post.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44342 Posts
October 26 2019 12:23 GMT
#37370
On October 26 2019 01:39 Ryzel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2019 01:36 Mohdoo wrote:
Gabbard suspending her reelection while also reciting Republican talking points on Hannity plants a pretty clear picture. Clinton proven right again


Oof, don’t know how that’s going to go over with her constituents. Hawaii is as blue as it gets.


I'm confused about what Tulsi Gabbard is doing. She's not popular in the Democratic primary, and she's no longer seeking reelection due to her decreasing popularity in her state. That means that either she doesn't care about being a political player anymore, or that she'll probably run as a third-party presidential candidate to steal votes away during the general election... And based on her crazy, inconsistent rhetoric, I don't actually know if she's more likely to steal votes away from the Democratic nominee or from Trump. She ran on some progressive platforms while simultaneously being a Trump and conservative apologist. She might continue to be more relevant on Fox News, although I feel like her presence on Fox News was mostly because she was happy to criticize the Democratic establishment.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Grackaroni
Profile Joined July 2011
United States9846 Posts
October 26 2019 13:15 GMT
#37371
On October 26 2019 21:23 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2019 01:39 Ryzel wrote:
On October 26 2019 01:36 Mohdoo wrote:
Gabbard suspending her reelection while also reciting Republican talking points on Hannity plants a pretty clear picture. Clinton proven right again


Oof, don’t know how that’s going to go over with her constituents. Hawaii is as blue as it gets.


I'm confused about what Tulsi Gabbard is doing. She's not popular in the Democratic primary, and she's no longer seeking reelection due to her decreasing popularity in her state. That means that either she doesn't care about being a political player anymore, or that she'll probably run as a third-party presidential candidate to steal votes away during the general election... And based on her crazy, inconsistent rhetoric, I don't actually know if she's more likely to steal votes away from the Democratic nominee or from Trump. She ran on some progressive platforms while simultaneously being a Trump and conservative apologist. She might continue to be more relevant on Fox News, although I feel like her presence on Fox News was mostly because she was happy to criticize the Democratic establishment.

Most likely she's looking for a lucrative speaker slot at FOX as the token democrat who will criticize other democrats and make the channel seem "balanced".

I doubt she's actually interested in running as a 3rd party.
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France7890 Posts
October 27 2019 14:22 GMT
#37372
Al Baghdadi is dead apparently. Awaiting Trump tweet claiming he did it all by himself.
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24682 Posts
October 27 2019 14:57 GMT
#37373
On October 27 2019 23:22 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Al Baghdadi is dead apparently. Awaiting Trump tweet claiming he did it all by himself.

Trump held a press conference an hour or two ago and went over most of the details. He did not claim he did it all by himself. I won't comment on some aspects of his dialogue that I thought was inappropriate, though.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-10-27 16:08:10
October 27 2019 16:07 GMT
#37374
Yes, some of what he said was problematic to say the least and likely to inflame tensions even more.

The recent comments of John Kelly certainly come to mind when I see stuff like this. Someone should have stepped in and made sure this statement Trump was to read regarding the killing of al-Baghdadi was as neutral and respectful as possible to not ratchet up tensions. It's quite clear at this point everyone who would have done so is gone, and have been replaced with people who say yes to everything and won't offer Trump actual feedback, criticism, or say anything that might upset him. Trump's overly violent description of the events will only make things worse.

Apparently the administration didn't bother to notify either the congressional leaders nor the Gang of Eight that this mission was going on.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
Lmui
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada6213 Posts
October 28 2019 16:50 GMT
#37375
The administration did notify Russia first, before anyone from Congress because IIRC it would overfly Russian held areas?

Apparently he told Lindsey Graham?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/after-decrying-leaks-trump-shares-sensitive-details-baghdadi-raid

As Pelosi said, with Trump, all roads lead to Putin.

He's apparently fucked with the Operation with what he did with the Kurds, and he shared way too much sensitive military information.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
October 28 2019 21:00 GMT
#37376
On October 27 2019 23:22 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Al Baghdadi is dead apparently. Awaiting Trump tweet claiming he did it all by himself.

Hasn't the guy "died" like 4 times, or am I thinking of someone else?
Moderator
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15689 Posts
October 28 2019 21:01 GMT
#37377
On October 29 2019 06:00 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 27 2019 23:22 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Al Baghdadi is dead apparently. Awaiting Trump tweet claiming he did it all by himself.

Hasn't the guy "died" like 4 times, or am I thinking of someone else?


Had a few maybes but this is the first time US has been like "yeah def this time"
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France7890 Posts
October 28 2019 21:07 GMT
#37378
On October 29 2019 06:00 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 27 2019 23:22 Biff The Understudy wrote:
Al Baghdadi is dead apparently. Awaiting Trump tweet claiming he did it all by himself.

Hasn't the guy "died" like 4 times, or am I thinking of someone else?

Really looks like he ran out of luck this time, though
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44342 Posts
October 29 2019 01:11 GMT
#37379
On October 29 2019 01:50 Lmui wrote:
The administration did notify Russia first, before anyone from Congress because IIRC it would overfly Russian held areas?

Apparently he told Lindsey Graham?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/after-decrying-leaks-trump-shares-sensitive-details-baghdadi-raid

As Pelosi said, with Trump, all roads lead to Putin.

He's apparently fucked with the Operation with what he did with the Kurds, and he shared way too much sensitive military information.


Between Trump sharing his sexual assault conquests, sensitive military information, and the fact that he thinks Osama bin Laden was "handsome", he's pretty much the quintessential TMI Perpetrator in every way possible.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-10-29 03:57:45
October 29 2019 03:53 GMT
#37380
Uh, you guys, this seems pretty bad for Trump:

Army Officer Who Heard Trump’s Ukraine Call Reported Concerns (NYT)

So essentially, Alexander Vindman, who is an Iraq War veteran that was awarded a Purple Heart after being wounded by a bomb, is an NSC official who is an expert on Ukraine. He was so troubled by what he heard in Trump and Zelinsky's phone call (he was on the call) that he reported it to his superiors on multiple occasions. He is scheduled to testify tomorrow and apparently is going to essentially corroborate the whistleblower's account, which to be fair has already been mostly confirmed by other witnesses, and add more details as needed. He worked directly with John Bolton and tried to get Trump to restore the funding to Ukraine, but Trump refused. His opening statement was released and it certainly doesn't make Trump look good.

WASHINGTON — A White House national security official who is a decorated Iraq war veteran plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he heard President Trump appeal to Ukraine’s president to investigate one of his leading political rivals, a request the aide considered so damaging to American interests that he reported it to a superior.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman of the Army, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, twice registered internal objections about how Mr. Trump and his inner circle were treating Ukraine, out of what he called a “sense of duty,” he plans to tell the inquiry, according to a draft of his opening statement obtained by The New York Times.

He will be the first White House official to testify who listened in on the July 25 telephone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine that is at the center of the impeachment inquiry, in which Mr. Trump asked Mr. Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Colonel Vindman said in his statement. “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”

If you read further into the article, Gordon Sondland is also discussed. It sounds like he could potentially be in some hot water since his account of events doesn't match up with multiple accounts of other officials, and does not line up with what Vindman is to say. Sondland and his lawyer have already apparently been at the SCIF to review and potentially correct testimony.

Vindman is a naturalized US citizen from Ukraine and he speaks fluent Russian and Ukrainian, so he communicates with Ukraine quite a bit, and the Ukrainians often communicated their concerns with him. Also interesting to note that Vindman isn't the only Vindman who works for the NSC. His identical twin brother, Yevgeny Vindman, is a lawyer for the NSC.

I wish the Republicans the best in their coming campaign to smear the integrity of an *checks notes* Iraq War vet who earned a Purple Heart and has served the US government in a vital role in dealing with the Ukrainian government during a tense period.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
Prev 1 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 5142 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 57m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech39
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 27098
Sea 1711
firebathero 1049
ggaemo 494
EffOrt 374
Stork 267
Larva 261
actioN 233
Hyuk 130
Dewaltoss 129
[ Show more ]
Sacsri 91
sSak 73
Backho 37
Sharp 29
Noble 28
IntoTheRainbow 8
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma215
XcaliburYe171
ODPixel105
League of Legends
JimRising 289
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K636
shoxiejesuss543
Other Games
Fuzer 217
crisheroes129
Mew2King126
SortOf111
rGuardiaN26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick852
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
57m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1h 57m
Replay Cast
14h 57m
LiuLi Cup
1d 1h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
RSL Revival
2 days
SC Evo League
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
RotterdaM Event
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.