Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.
Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.
Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.
On April 20 2015 01:38 Odoakar wrote: Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.
Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.
Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.
HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.
Ill keep an eye on the M8 if i were you, it will drop quite in price and some reviewers/people are kinda dissapointed with the M9 since it didnt upgade enough.
Check reviews or something, maybe you can get almost the same smartphone for a lot less
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.
Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)
When I saw this thread I instantly wondered whether QuantumTeleportation was AutoEngineer's new account.
That's what I thought. I was hoping somehow the conversation would turn toward Japan.
On April 17 2015 10:04 Faruko wrote: I owned a Moto G, now a Moto X 2014, was thinking about the S6 but... (And this is for all phones mind you !)
i realize that even with all the specs of the X i dont use it for anything that would task the CPU/GPU at all... pretty much Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, some non-intensive games and thats about it
For all that matters if i would have stayed with the G everything would be the same, sure i love the X and its the best phone ive ever owned (and not talking about specs !), i mean sure its slightly smoother (i say the X 2014 its pretty much lag free), but its not a HUGE step up from my old G (In fact, i just upgrade my gf G to 5.0 and its pretty much as smooth as my X 2014)
But we have come to the point that the specs of the phone are much more than what we actually need, i rather see Companies put new (worthwile) stuff and try to come up with new battery technology than a fingerprint/biometric sensor, thats just a novelty, cool to have, but everyone could live without it
Or Google/Android start taking advantage of all this terrific specs because i sure dont feel they havent been doing enough with it (Make no comparisson to Apple, because i feel they are doing the same)
The 14nm CPU, DDR4 RAM and ultra-fast UFS flash memory inside the Galaxy S6 isn't manly for boosting the intra-application speeds.
Rather, these high tech parts are used for other reasons such as loading apps faster and boosting web browsing speeds and smoothness. Also I noticed that the Galaxy S6 tends not to lag much in high stress situations such as having massive amounts photos or videos on a webpage. The iPhone 6 becomes lag city when subjected to the same conditions.
Also the double tap to open the camera mechanism can only be achieved with the Galaxy S6 because it requires high processing speeds.
Some people have realized that not even the iPhone 6S will challenge the Galaxy S6 when it comes to high tech parts.
Of course some people want simplicity and that's what iPhones offer. But the Galaxy S6 is just as simple to use IMO, unless someone is really computer/smartphone illiterate.
HAHAHAHAHAHA PLEASE STOP I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE
Man my X 2014 seems to be from the future because it does it without even having to tap anywhere ! Im 2 taps ahead of the Galaxy S6 ...
(for the record, i really like the S6)
EDIT: And it seems even the Galaxy s4 has that "impressive high processing speed that you need to double tap a physical button"
On April 17 2015 10:04 Faruko wrote: I owned a Moto G, now a Moto X 2014, was thinking about the S6 but... (And this is for all phones mind you !)
i realize that even with all the specs of the X i dont use it for anything that would task the CPU/GPU at all... pretty much Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, some non-intensive games and thats about it
For all that matters if i would have stayed with the G everything would be the same, sure i love the X and its the best phone ive ever owned (and not talking about specs !), i mean sure its slightly smoother (i say the X 2014 its pretty much lag free), but its not a HUGE step up from my old G (In fact, i just upgrade my gf G to 5.0 and its pretty much as smooth as my X 2014)
But we have come to the point that the specs of the phone are much more than what we actually need, i rather see Companies put new (worthwile) stuff and try to come up with new battery technology than a fingerprint/biometric sensor, thats just a novelty, cool to have, but everyone could live without it
Or Google/Android start taking advantage of all this terrific specs because i sure dont feel they havent been doing enough with it (Make no comparisson to Apple, because i feel they are doing the same)
The 14nm CPU, DDR4 RAM and ultra-fast UFS flash memory inside the Galaxy S6 isn't manly for boosting the intra-application speeds.
Rather, these high tech parts are used for other reasons such as loading apps faster and boosting web browsing speeds and smoothness. Also I noticed that the Galaxy S6 tends not to lag much in high stress situations such as having massive amounts photos or videos on a webpage. The iPhone 6 becomes lag city when subjected to the same conditions.
Also the double tap to open the camera mechanism can only be achieved with the Galaxy S6 because it requires high processing speeds.
Some people have realized that not even the iPhone 6S will challenge the Galaxy S6 when it comes to high tech parts.
Of course some people want simplicity and that's what iPhones offer. But the Galaxy S6 is just as simple to use IMO, unless someone is really computer/smartphone illiterate.
HAHAHAHAHAHA PLEASE STOP I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE
Man my X 2014 seems to be from the future because it does it without even having to tap anywhere ! Im 2 taps ahead of the Galaxy S6 ...
(for the record, i really like the S6)
EDIT: And it seems even the Galaxy s4 has that "impressive high processing speed that you need to double tap a physical button"
On April 20 2015 01:38 Odoakar wrote: Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.
Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.
Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.
HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.
Ill keep an eye on the M8 if i were you, it will drop quite in price and some reviewers/people are kinda dissapointed with the M9 since it didnt upgade enough.
Check reviews or something, maybe you can get almost the same smartphone for a lot less
Tnx, will look into it, I'm with M7 right now and loving it.
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.
Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)
I'm not even against the phone. I'm glad Samsung finally figured out design beats tech specs/features in mobile phones, and the sales are vindicating them against people complaining about SD card slots and removable batteries. But man, his posts are shill-y.
So I'm a "paid Samsung poster" who also posts about the Apple Watch and states that he loves Apple products?
The review that I wrote on page 4 was purely my opinion. It doesn't represent everyone's perspectives and it's not like I'm trying to force people to buy the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge.
On April 20 2015 01:38 Odoakar wrote: Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.
Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.
Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.
HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.
I welcome your opinion.
The design on the Galaxy S6 is subject to debate, so is the design on the HTC One M9/iPhone 6/etc. Many people dislike the design on the HTC One M9 because it's too thick and heavy, but then again some people like a weighty feel to their phones. I personally don't like the thick/heavy feeling and the ugly antenna bands at the back of the HTC One M9. I like my smartphones to feel slim and light. Also metal is not the best choice for technology products as it impedes radio signals. http://pocketnow.com/2014/10/15/are-metal-phones-better Glass is the best choice for technology products such as smartphones because it feels premium and yet it doesn't impede radio signals. The disadvantage with glass is that it may shatter when dropped, although the glass on the Galaxy S6 and especially the Galaxy S6 Edge, has proven to be very resilient to shattering. Copy these links into your browser and watch them because I don't want to flood this post with so many videos: youtube.com/watch?v=gdkPKeOVOrk youtube.com/watch?v=DpsyGweP5so Another disadvantage of glass is that it may be more prone to fingerprints than metal smartphones, although the rather glossy metal finish on the HTC One M9 is prone to fingerprints too. I have the Galaxy S6 Edge and fingerprints on the glass are barely noticeable in everyday use and it's not easy to get a lot of visible fingerprints on the back.
The Galaxy S6 is most similar to the Sony Xperia Z3, not the iPhone 6 btw.
It doesn't mean that Samsung copied Sony.
In my opinion (and many analysts and experts' opinions), the HTC One M9 is a poor upgrade over the HTC One M8 for a number of important reasons:
These are during benchmarking, however there have been many reports of the HTC One M9 overheating during routine use. So it doesn't set a good precedent, especially if you want to keep your next smartphone for another 2 years.
The camera on the HTC One M9 has poor optics despite the 20MP sensor. Before you say "but the HTC One M9 has a 20MP sensor compared to the Galaxy S6's 16MP and iPhone 6's 8MP sensors". The fact is that megapixels mean almost next to nothing these days when it comes to image quality (IQ). Marques Brownlee even says that the HTC One M9's camera is one of its poorest points:
The design is unchanged from the HTC One M8 with only a few tweaks and adjustments. I guess people will say "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" but still, the design doesn't bring anything new, so it's an automatic disadvantage for the HTC One M9 because most people want new aesthetics.
The HTC One M9 is still a great smartphone, however it's not a significant upgrade over the HTC One M8. If you guys are looking for a huge upgrade this year, get the iPhone 6S or the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge. Maybe even the LG G4 (the LG G4's quantum Quad-HD display will be one of the best displays this year) or the Sony Xperia Z4. But not the HTC One M9.
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.
Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)
I'm not even against the phone. I'm glad Samsung finally figured out design beats tech specs/features in mobile phones, and the sales are vindicating them against people complaining about SD card slots and removable batteries. But man, his posts are shill-y.
So I'm a "paid Samsung poster" who also posts about the Apple Watch and states that he loves Apple products?
The review that I wrote on page 4 was purely my opinion. It doesn't represent everyone's perspectives and it's not like I'm trying to force people to buy the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge.
If you're not a paid Samsung poster, why do you try so hard?
On April 20 2015 12:30 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
On April 19 2015 20:46 Jibba wrote:
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.
Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)
I'm not even against the phone. I'm glad Samsung finally figured out design beats tech specs/features in mobile phones, and the sales are vindicating them against people complaining about SD card slots and removable batteries. But man, his posts are shill-y.
So I'm a "paid Samsung poster" who also posts about the Apple Watch and states that he loves Apple products?
The review that I wrote on page 4 was purely my opinion. It doesn't represent everyone's perspectives and it's not like I'm trying to force people to buy the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge.
If you're not a paid Samsung poster, why do you try so hard?
If you see most of my posts I try to give maximal information regarding smartphones and the Apple Watch.
Maybe I'm just too over-enthusiastic about high tech products.
Please don't mistake that and label me as an Apple or Samsung employee.
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.
The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.
Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.
The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.
Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.
I find plastic or similar superior because - it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke) - it gives a much better grip for one hand usage - it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price. - I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.
The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.
Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.
I find plastic or similar superior because - it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke) - it gives a much better grip for one hand usage - it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price. - I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)
I never really understood why people keep calling aluminium a "premium material". As far as I know it's one of the cheapest and least durable kinds of metal around. My iPhone has plenty of dents and scratches in it from falling on concrete. Not all that premium to me.
Although yes, it feels less cheap than holding a plastic slab. Doesn't necessarily mean it is though.
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.
The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.
Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.
I find plastic or similar superior because - it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke) - it gives a much better grip for one hand usage - it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price. - I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)
I never really understood why people keep calling aluminium a "premium material". As far as I know it's one of the cheapest and least durable kinds of metal around. My iPhone has plenty of dents and scratches in it from falling on concrete. Not all that premium to me.
Although yes, it feels less cheap than holding a plastic slab. Doesn't necessarily mean it is though.
I agree. When I used "premium" I was using the marketers' word, that's why I added it was a bad excuse to sell the phones at a higher price.
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.
The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.
Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.
I find plastic or similar superior because - it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke) - it gives a much better grip for one hand usage - it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price. - I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)
Plastic feels tacky and is a poor choice of material. It bends easier than metal and it just feels cheap. Aluminum is high quality if you can make it high quality. The HTC One M9 has aerospace grade aluminum.
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote: Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.
The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.
Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.
I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.
The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.
Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.
I find plastic or similar superior because - it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke) - it gives a much better grip for one hand usage - it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price. - I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)
I never really understood why people keep calling aluminium a "premium material". As far as I know it's one of the cheapest and least durable kinds of metal around. My iPhone has plenty of dents and scratches in it from falling on concrete. Not all that premium to me.
Although yes, it feels less cheap than holding a plastic slab. Doesn't necessarily mean it is though.
Exactly. That is what I meant. The HTC one M9 is premium because it feels premium and uses aerospace grade aluminum. It's a shame that no one buys HTC's phones because they are easily the best at designing. Aluminum is very premium if you can make it premium. Just remember buddy.