• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:00
CEST 02:00
KST 09:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy19ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy3GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding6Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage5Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
JD's Ro24 review Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
JD's Ro24 review BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 General Discussion [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The China Politics Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Streamers Inspire Gamers…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2815 users

Samsung Galaxy S6 & S6 Edge Thread - Page 5

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Odoakar
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia1837 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-19 16:39:21
April 19 2015 16:38 GMT
#81
Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.

Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.

Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.

HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.
Faruko
Profile Joined April 2013
Chile34173 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-19 19:26:22
April 19 2015 19:25 GMT
#82
On April 20 2015 01:38 Odoakar wrote:
Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.

Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.

Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.

HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.

Ill keep an eye on the M8 if i were you, it will drop quite in price and some reviewers/people are kinda dissapointed with the M9 since it didnt upgade enough.

Check reviews or something, maybe you can get almost the same smartphone for a lot less
Ross was right // "Jesus Christ nahaz is doing shots before my eyes" (Sn0_Man, 2018)
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23848 Posts
April 19 2015 19:36 GMT
#83
On April 19 2015 22:16 endy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2015 20:46 Jibba wrote:
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:

Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.

Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)


When I saw this thread I instantly wondered whether QuantumTeleportation was AutoEngineer's new account.


That's what I thought. I was hoping somehow the conversation would turn toward Japan.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
skyR
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada13817 Posts
April 19 2015 20:28 GMT
#84
On April 19 2015 23:25 Faruko wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
On April 19 2015 11:34 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 17 2015 10:04 Faruko wrote:
I owned a Moto G, now a Moto X 2014, was thinking about the S6 but... (And this is for all phones mind you !)

i realize that even with all the specs of the X i dont use it for anything that would task the CPU/GPU at all... pretty much Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, some non-intensive games and thats about it

For all that matters if i would have stayed with the G everything would be the same, sure i love the X and its the best phone ive ever owned (and not talking about specs !), i mean sure its slightly smoother (i say the X 2014 its pretty much lag free), but its not a HUGE step up from my old G (In fact, i just upgrade my gf G to 5.0 and its pretty much as smooth as my X 2014)

But we have come to the point that the specs of the phone are much more than what we actually need, i rather see Companies put new (worthwile) stuff and try to come up with new battery technology than a fingerprint/biometric sensor, thats just a novelty, cool to have, but everyone could live without it

Or Google/Android start taking advantage of all this terrific specs because i sure dont feel they havent been doing enough with it (Make no comparisson to Apple, because i feel they are doing the same)



The 14nm CPU, DDR4 RAM and ultra-fast UFS flash memory inside the Galaxy S6 isn't manly for boosting the intra-application speeds.

Rather, these high tech parts are used for other reasons such as loading apps faster and boosting web browsing speeds and smoothness. Also I noticed that the Galaxy S6 tends not to lag much in high stress situations such as having massive amounts photos or videos on a webpage. The iPhone 6 becomes lag city when subjected to the same conditions.

Also the double tap to open the camera mechanism can only be achieved with the Galaxy S6 because it requires high processing speeds.

Also the CPU/RAM/GPU power on the Galaxy S6 is not its only strength. The high-end design, Quad-HD display (which is rated by DisplayMate as the most color accurate and brightest display in the smartphone industry), and 16MP optically stabilized DSLR-like camera are also huge reasons why people are rushing to buy the Galaxy S6.

Some people have realized that not even the iPhone 6S will challenge the Galaxy S6 when it comes to high tech parts.

Of course some people want simplicity and that's what iPhones offer. But the Galaxy S6 is just as simple to use IMO, unless someone is really computer/smartphone illiterate.



HAHAHAHAHAHA PLEASE STOP I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE

Man my X 2014 seems to be from the future because it does it without even having to tap anywhere ! Im 2 taps ahead of the Galaxy S6 ...

(for the record, i really like the S6)

EDIT: And it seems even the Galaxy s4 has that "impressive high processing speed that you need to double tap a physical button"



I'm pretty sure my S2 can do this too...
Faruko
Profile Joined April 2013
Chile34173 Posts
April 19 2015 20:54 GMT
#85
On April 20 2015 05:28 skyR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2015 23:25 Faruko wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
On April 19 2015 11:34 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 17 2015 10:04 Faruko wrote:
I owned a Moto G, now a Moto X 2014, was thinking about the S6 but... (And this is for all phones mind you !)

i realize that even with all the specs of the X i dont use it for anything that would task the CPU/GPU at all... pretty much Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter, some non-intensive games and thats about it

For all that matters if i would have stayed with the G everything would be the same, sure i love the X and its the best phone ive ever owned (and not talking about specs !), i mean sure its slightly smoother (i say the X 2014 its pretty much lag free), but its not a HUGE step up from my old G (In fact, i just upgrade my gf G to 5.0 and its pretty much as smooth as my X 2014)

But we have come to the point that the specs of the phone are much more than what we actually need, i rather see Companies put new (worthwile) stuff and try to come up with new battery technology than a fingerprint/biometric sensor, thats just a novelty, cool to have, but everyone could live without it

Or Google/Android start taking advantage of all this terrific specs because i sure dont feel they havent been doing enough with it (Make no comparisson to Apple, because i feel they are doing the same)



The 14nm CPU, DDR4 RAM and ultra-fast UFS flash memory inside the Galaxy S6 isn't manly for boosting the intra-application speeds.

Rather, these high tech parts are used for other reasons such as loading apps faster and boosting web browsing speeds and smoothness. Also I noticed that the Galaxy S6 tends not to lag much in high stress situations such as having massive amounts photos or videos on a webpage. The iPhone 6 becomes lag city when subjected to the same conditions.

Also the double tap to open the camera mechanism can only be achieved with the Galaxy S6 because it requires high processing speeds.

Also the CPU/RAM/GPU power on the Galaxy S6 is not its only strength. The high-end design, Quad-HD display (which is rated by DisplayMate as the most color accurate and brightest display in the smartphone industry), and 16MP optically stabilized DSLR-like camera are also huge reasons why people are rushing to buy the Galaxy S6.

Some people have realized that not even the iPhone 6S will challenge the Galaxy S6 when it comes to high tech parts.

Of course some people want simplicity and that's what iPhones offer. But the Galaxy S6 is just as simple to use IMO, unless someone is really computer/smartphone illiterate.



HAHAHAHAHAHA PLEASE STOP I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE

Man my X 2014 seems to be from the future because it does it without even having to tap anywhere ! Im 2 taps ahead of the Galaxy S6 ...

(for the record, i really like the S6)

EDIT: And it seems even the Galaxy s4 has that "impressive high processing speed that you need to double tap a physical button"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0SI9vwrv5o


I'm pretty sure my S2 can do this too...

I bet it does !
Ross was right // "Jesus Christ nahaz is doing shots before my eyes" (Sn0_Man, 2018)
Odoakar
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia1837 Posts
April 19 2015 21:19 GMT
#86
On April 20 2015 04:25 Faruko wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 01:38 Odoakar wrote:
Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.

Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.

Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.

HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.

Ill keep an eye on the M8 if i were you, it will drop quite in price and some reviewers/people are kinda dissapointed with the M9 since it didnt upgade enough.

Check reviews or something, maybe you can get almost the same smartphone for a lot less


Tnx, will look into it, I'm with M7 right now and loving it.
QuantumTeleportation
Profile Joined March 2015
United States119 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 04:16:35
April 20 2015 03:30 GMT
#87
On April 19 2015 20:46 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:

Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.

Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)

I'm not even against the phone. I'm glad Samsung finally figured out design beats tech specs/features in mobile phones, and the sales are vindicating them against people complaining about SD card slots and removable batteries. But man, his posts are shill-y.


So I'm a "paid Samsung poster" who also posts about the Apple Watch and states that he loves Apple products?

The review that I wrote on page 4 was purely my opinion. It doesn't represent everyone's perspectives and it's not like I'm trying to force people to buy the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge.

On April 20 2015 01:38 Odoakar wrote:
Checked it yesterday in the shop and although the front side looks slick, the back side is really, really ugly. There's no mat finish like HTC has, and the camera protruding from the back feels so akward, especially with the back side being so flat, with rough edges.

Design wise, it's far from M9 and doesn't give that premium feeling of holding something metal and sturdy in your hand.

Can't comment on the SW side, I know my S3 dissapointed me to no end with the awful battery and laggy OS and it will take a lot of good reviews to get me back on Samsungs side again.

HTC M9 is my choice for this generation.


I welcome your opinion.

The design on the Galaxy S6 is subject to debate, so is the design on the HTC One M9/iPhone 6/etc. Many people dislike the design on the HTC One M9 because it's too thick and heavy, but then again some people like a weighty feel to their phones. I personally don't like the thick/heavy feeling and the ugly antenna bands at the back of the HTC One M9.
I like my smartphones to feel slim and light.
Also metal is not the best choice for technology products as it impedes radio signals.
http://pocketnow.com/2014/10/15/are-metal-phones-better
Glass is the best choice for technology products such as smartphones because it feels premium and yet it doesn't impede radio signals.
The disadvantage with glass is that it may shatter when dropped, although the glass on the Galaxy S6 and especially the Galaxy S6 Edge, has proven to be very resilient to shattering. Copy these links into your browser and watch them because I don't want to flood this post with so many videos:
youtube.com/watch?v=gdkPKeOVOrk
youtube.com/watch?v=DpsyGweP5so
Another disadvantage of glass is that it may be more prone to fingerprints than metal smartphones, although the rather glossy metal finish on the HTC One M9 is prone to fingerprints too. I have the Galaxy S6 Edge and fingerprints on the glass are barely noticeable in everyday use and it's not easy to get a lot of visible fingerprints on the back.

The Galaxy S6 is most similar to the Sony Xperia Z3, not the iPhone 6 btw.

It doesn't mean that Samsung copied Sony.

In my opinion (and many analysts and experts' opinions), the HTC One M9 is a poor upgrade over the HTC One M8 for a number of important reasons:

  • The HTC One M9 uses the Snapdragon 810 which has reported a myriad of overheating problems which causes the CPU to throttle down, causing lag.
    [image loading]
    Reference: http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_one_m9_found_to_overheat_in_benchmark_test-news-11571.php

    These are during benchmarking, however there have been many reports of the HTC One M9 overheating during routine use. So it doesn't set a good precedent, especially if you want to keep your next smartphone for another 2 years.
  • The camera on the HTC One M9 has poor optics despite the 20MP sensor. Before you say "but the HTC One M9 has a 20MP sensor compared to the Galaxy S6's 16MP and iPhone 6's 8MP sensors". The fact is that megapixels mean almost next to nothing these days when it comes to image quality (IQ). Marques Brownlee even says that the HTC One M9's camera is one of its poorest points:

  • The design is unchanged from the HTC One M8 with only a few tweaks and adjustments. I guess people will say "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" but still, the design doesn't bring anything new, so it's an automatic disadvantage for the HTC One M9 because most people want new aesthetics.


The HTC One M9 is still a great smartphone, however it's not a significant upgrade over the HTC One M8.
If you guys are looking for a huge upgrade this year, get the iPhone 6S or the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge. Maybe even the LG G4 (the LG G4's quantum Quad-HD display will be one of the best displays this year) or the Sony Xperia Z4.
But not the HTC One M9.
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
April 20 2015 04:58 GMT
#88
On April 20 2015 12:30 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2015 20:46 Jibba wrote:
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:

Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.

Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)

I'm not even against the phone. I'm glad Samsung finally figured out design beats tech specs/features in mobile phones, and the sales are vindicating them against people complaining about SD card slots and removable batteries. But man, his posts are shill-y.


So I'm a "paid Samsung poster" who also posts about the Apple Watch and states that he loves Apple products?

The review that I wrote on page 4 was purely my opinion. It doesn't represent everyone's perspectives and it's not like I'm trying to force people to buy the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge.

If you're not a paid Samsung poster, why do you try so hard?
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
QuantumTeleportation
Profile Joined March 2015
United States119 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 06:38:39
April 20 2015 06:37 GMT
#89
On April 20 2015 13:58 T.O.P. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 12:30 QuantumTeleportation wrote:
On April 19 2015 20:46 Jibba wrote:
On April 16 2015 12:08 QuantumTeleportation wrote:

Samsung's slogan "the future will be the present" makes a lot of sense now.

Does QuantumTeleportation sound like a paid Samsung poster to anyone else? Remember when Samsung was caught doing that a couple years ago (and TL had one of them posting here.)

I'm not even against the phone. I'm glad Samsung finally figured out design beats tech specs/features in mobile phones, and the sales are vindicating them against people complaining about SD card slots and removable batteries. But man, his posts are shill-y.


So I'm a "paid Samsung poster" who also posts about the Apple Watch and states that he loves Apple products?

The review that I wrote on page 4 was purely my opinion. It doesn't represent everyone's perspectives and it's not like I'm trying to force people to buy the Galaxy S6/S6 Edge.

If you're not a paid Samsung poster, why do you try so hard?


If you see most of my posts I try to give maximal information regarding smartphones and the Apple Watch.

Maybe I'm just too over-enthusiastic about high tech products.

Please don't mistake that and label me as an Apple or Samsung employee.
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
April 20 2015 10:33 GMT
#90
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.
endy
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Switzerland8970 Posts
April 20 2015 12:22 GMT
#91
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.
ॐ
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 13:07:05
April 20 2015 13:04 GMT
#92
On April 20 2015 21:22 endy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.


The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.

The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.

Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.
zev318
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada4306 Posts
April 20 2015 13:25 GMT
#93
battery life on the m9 seems to be not very good. better get some portable battery packs
endy
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Switzerland8970 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-20 13:32:14
April 20 2015 13:31 GMT
#94
On April 20 2015 22:04 Apotek wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 21:22 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.


The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.

The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.

Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.


I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.

I find plastic or similar superior because
- it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke)
- it gives a much better grip for one hand usage
- it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price.
- I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)
ॐ
maartendq
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Belgium3115 Posts
April 20 2015 13:35 GMT
#95
On April 20 2015 22:31 endy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:04 Apotek wrote:
On April 20 2015 21:22 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.


The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.

The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.

Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.


I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.

I find plastic or similar superior because
- it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke)
- it gives a much better grip for one hand usage
- it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price.
- I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)

I never really understood why people keep calling aluminium a "premium material". As far as I know it's one of the cheapest and least durable kinds of metal around. My iPhone has plenty of dents and scratches in it from falling on concrete. Not all that premium to me.

Although yes, it feels less cheap than holding a plastic slab. Doesn't necessarily mean it is though.
endy
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Switzerland8970 Posts
April 20 2015 13:45 GMT
#96
On April 20 2015 22:35 maartendq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:31 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:04 Apotek wrote:
On April 20 2015 21:22 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.


The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.

The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.

Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.


I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.

I find plastic or similar superior because
- it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke)
- it gives a much better grip for one hand usage
- it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price.
- I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)

I never really understood why people keep calling aluminium a "premium material". As far as I know it's one of the cheapest and least durable kinds of metal around. My iPhone has plenty of dents and scratches in it from falling on concrete. Not all that premium to me.

Although yes, it feels less cheap than holding a plastic slab. Doesn't necessarily mean it is though.


I agree. When I used "premium" I was using the marketers' word, that's why I added it was a bad excuse to sell the phones at a higher price.
ॐ
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
April 20 2015 14:26 GMT
#97
On April 20 2015 22:25 zev318 wrote:
battery life on the m9 seems to be not very good. better get some portable battery packs


Battery life isn't that important. Most people can get by for a whole day now.
Also where is your proof that the M9 has "not very good" battery life?
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
April 20 2015 14:28 GMT
#98
On April 20 2015 22:31 endy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:04 Apotek wrote:
On April 20 2015 21:22 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.


The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.

The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.

Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.


I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.

I find plastic or similar superior because
- it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke)
- it gives a much better grip for one hand usage
- it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price.
- I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)


Plastic feels tacky and is a poor choice of material. It bends easier than metal and it just feels cheap. Aluminum is high quality if you can make it high quality. The HTC One M9 has aerospace grade aluminum.
Apotek
Profile Joined April 2015
Taiwan34 Posts
April 20 2015 14:31 GMT
#99
On April 20 2015 22:35 maartendq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2015 22:31 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 22:04 Apotek wrote:
On April 20 2015 21:22 endy wrote:
On April 20 2015 19:33 Apotek wrote:
Both the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 are ugly phones to be honest.

The best looking phone by far is the HTC One M9.

Too bad no one buys them because of Apple and Samsung's monopoly.


It's highly subjective, I personally find the M9 bad looking with its giant bezels.

I find the S6 very pretty but I think the glass will get scratched very easily and paying for an expensive glass cover only to put a rubber case on it is absurd. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood covers ftw. I just learned about the Moto Maxx and I love its back cover.


The giant bezels are for protection. The HTC One M9 is thick because HTC doesn't want the phone to break.The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 are tacky IMO. They break easily when dropped. The HTC One M9 uses aerospace grade aluminum. The iPhone 6/Galaxy S6 don't. It's a shame people dont realize this. The HTC One M9 is very well designed. Yet not many people notice it or buy it. Plastic/carbon fiber/nylon/leather/wood? That's even tackier than iPhone 6/Galaxy S6.

The only good thing about the Galaxy S6 is the high-end technology. And the iPhone 6 has 120FPS video recording.

Other than that, HTC One M9 is the best, especially the design.


I don't understand the meaning of "tacky", but once again I believe the case material is purely a matter of preference.

I find plastic or similar superior because
- it absorbs shocks very well so quite often you don't even need a case (I dropped my S2 literally a hundred times over the last 4 years and it never broke)
- it gives a much better grip for one hand usage
- it's cheap and obviously premium materials are an (bad) excuse for a higher price.
- I always remember the debates with my Apple fans friends back then who were making fun of the plastic case of my S2 while 90% of them had a disgusting rubber case around their iPhones :'-)

I never really understood why people keep calling aluminium a "premium material". As far as I know it's one of the cheapest and least durable kinds of metal around. My iPhone has plenty of dents and scratches in it from falling on concrete. Not all that premium to me.

Although yes, it feels less cheap than holding a plastic slab. Doesn't necessarily mean it is though.


Exactly. That is what I meant. The HTC one M9 is premium because it feels premium and uses aerospace grade aluminum. It's a shame that no one buys HTC's phones because they are easily the best at designing.
Aluminum is very premium if you can make it premium. Just remember buddy.
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4783 Posts
April 20 2015 15:32 GMT
#100
Hey guys, did you know that the HTC one M9 has aerospace grade aluminum?!!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
19:00
RO32 Group A
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
ZZZero.O221
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft374
Ketroc 69
ProTech60
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 466
ZZZero.O 221
910 42
NaDa 13
Dota 2
canceldota438
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor180
Other Games
gofns22359
summit1g15952
FrodaN1984
C9.Mang0119
ROOTCatZ21
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick712
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH120
• RyuSc2 64
• musti20045 30
• HeavenSC 29
• Adnapsc2 26
• davetesta26
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• 3DClanTV 43
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5131
Other Games
• Scarra618
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10h
WardiTV Team League
11h
OSC
13h
BSL
19h
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
19h
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Wardi Open
1d 10h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 10h
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 16h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
[ Show More ]
GSL
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Escore
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
IPSL
6 days
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W2
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.