
testie's post was awesome, not wanting to kiss his ass but he's basically right.
and yeah, men vs females is truly IMBA....fucking think before you write something.
can we have a crusade against "men vs females is IMBA"-threads

Forum Index > General Forum |
Cpt Obvious
Germany3073 Posts
![]() testie's post was awesome, not wanting to kiss his ass but he's basically right. and yeah, men vs females is truly IMBA....fucking think before you write something. can we have a crusade against "men vs females is IMBA"-threads ![]() | ||
ParasitJonte
Sweden1768 Posts
The whole read is a waste of time, waste of life. There are females that like to be treated like sluts/whores/bitches whatever you want to call it and there are males who like to be treated the same way. But to say that this would be true for all females (and no males) simply implies that you know absolutely nothing of mankind. Any study will show you that above all, women seek commitment from men (refer to David M Buss' international survey done in the late 80s if interested). This does not equate with being cheated upon which, understandably, instead is a major turn off. For simple evolutionary reasons as well: women who did not secure a man who commited himself only to her and their joint offspring would surely not be as succesfull as women who did. Women are monogamous, however like females from other species (where the gender roles are about the same) they have a cuck-old strategy, which would explain why women occasionally cheat on their men. Men are semi-polygamous. Any man who secures multiple females will surley have more offspring than one who doesn't. But if he does, another man will obviously go starving female attention. For natural ethical and moral reasons I do believe that a one-to-one ratio is the best when it comes to relationships. And how that relationship works is up to the participants. But the guy who wrote this "article" is probably a cavemen. | ||
IIICodeIIIIIII
China1101 Posts
and as for the male vs female = IMBA, i'd say it's like PvZ is imba. At low levels, it favors protoss and at high levels, it favors zerg. guys are attracted to girls large part due to looks. This means that if a girl looks great, she'd doing great, but for a girl who looks like crap, there's only so much that makeup and cosmetics can do so she's basically fucked. but for guys, girls are attracted to guys based on personality, character, etc. That means that every single guy has what it takes to become attractive, whereas girls... if they're ugly, shit, she's ugly. hahah XD I agree that jealousy is great for getting girls to start chasing a guy more (as opposed to the guy having to chase the girl), but cheating on a girl may be too far for some personalities (for example, introverted premed asian girl), but may be just right for some other personalities (for example, extroverted prebusiness sorority girl). i love women... | ||
lil.sis
China4650 Posts
you will never have a meaningful relationship. also rofl u suk | ||
IIICodeIIIIIII
China1101 Posts
On December 24 2006 04:18 lil.sis wrote: if you honestly, truly think this is a good article and believe what it says then i have bad news for you you will never have a meaningful relationship. also rofl u suk so does that mean that ... if i am currently in a great relationship, have a great life, know where i'm going, am "complete package" so to speak, that u would be the one who sucks and not me? Also, may i point out that this dude says a lot of things... nobody would agree with all of them, but there are some points that he brings up that are absolutely true, that most people wouldn't agree with. | ||
Prodigy[x]
Canada207 Posts
| ||
Cpt Obvious
Germany3073 Posts
On December 24 2006 05:21 Prodigy[x] wrote: Most of it is true. Either you run the relationship and you will never feel stressed and fight with your girl. Or you try to be equal with her, and trust me you will end up getting bitched. most of this isn't true. QFT....noooot. | ||
Nazarene
Denmark996 Posts
I agree that todays society has 'pussified' a lot of men. Women want strong men. But nothing new in that really. | ||
dronebabo
10866 Posts
| ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
anyways, the article treats women like alien creatures, but most of them are very simple. i dont see where the mass of pathos come from. edit: everytime this piece mentions evolution I feel like smacking him. | ||
![]()
pheer
5390 Posts
I got down to the government conspiracy part, and couldn't read any more without wanting to neuter the author so he shuts up about his circles. | ||
decafchicken
United States20020 Posts
On December 24 2006 02:30 Physician wrote: After first 1 min I gave up, trash. Anyway irrespective of the content of the article or the opinions - I have an observation, or rather a question: Who is using Testie's account? That is not the Testie I've seen post in the past.. that is the third or fourth post I see him write from a girls perspective - and besides, the Testie I know can live without posting a smiley of sorts. Interesting point. | ||
nA.Inky
United States794 Posts
This guy (original post) tries to portray his ideas as scientific, but he cites no source (let alone a credible anthropological source) and demonstrates no credible knowledge of history or human behavior. It seems clear to me that he views the past through the lens of modern culture, then uses his view of the past to justify his modern ideas. As Testie said, this is a very sociopathic view of relationships. There is no love in this guy's outlook. No compassion. It worries me that young, insecure men will latch on to this advice to help themselves attract women. It is normal and common to be intimidated by dating and romance today. There is nothing wrong with seeking out romance, and trying to do so in the best possible way. What makes this so difficult is that we live in a very jaded, materialistic, consumer culture. There are certainly other factors to our culture, but in short, our culture churns out a lot of messed up people and a lot of messed up ideas. This can mean that taking the best possible approach towards romance/dating/love, an approach rooted in honesty, compassion, and respect, will not always get good results. Romance is never a certain thing, but when you throw in a lot of the messed up aspects of our culture, it becomes even more complicated. Don't let this complexity and difficulty deter you from being a decent human being. The attitudes of the original post are ridiculously cynical, calloused, cold, harmful, and cruel. Some women may very well be quite receptive to his approach. Those aren't the women you ought to pursue. And relationships built on these ideas are going to be very cold and empty. Love is built on trust and empathy and kindness and acceptance. Don't be fooled by any substitutes! Sex for it's own sake can be quite fun, and I have nothing against it, but by itself will always end up so empty and unfulfilling compared to love itself. I agree with Testie: it is great to see many of the reactions to the original post. I am actually pleasantly surprised. I only have written what I have written here because I know there are insecure young people out there who may be taken in by such horrible ideas as in the original post. Please, be patient and go forward in harmony. Nick/Inky | ||
![]()
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6771 Posts
On December 24 2006 01:02 alffla wrote: the writer with girlfriend / girl that he treats like shit ewww she has a coinslot On December 24 2006 02:59 pr0n- wrote: evan, i that vgi-cow in that video? ![]() vGL, not i | ||
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
On December 24 2006 02:59 pr0n- wrote: and yeah, men vs females is truly IMBA....fucking think before you write something. can we have a crusade against "men vs females is IMBA"-threads ![]() hahaha outside of the whole idea that we have it in our genes to reproduce as much as possible, i dont agree with any of this stuff. however, its still funny to read =x | ||
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
| ||
Ghin
United States2391 Posts
| ||
Figurehead
Poland31 Posts
| ||
oshibori_probe
United States2933 Posts
stephane also signs his posts, but worse, twice! -Oshibori -Oshibori | ||
-_-
United States7081 Posts
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Stormgate![]() Rain ![]() Flash ![]() Shuttle ![]() Bisu ![]() firebathero ![]() Horang2 ![]() EffOrt ![]() Mini ![]() Larva ![]() [ Show more ] Mong ![]() Soulkey ![]() ggaemo ![]() ZerO ![]() Snow ![]() hero ![]() Barracks ![]() Soma ![]() Hyuk ![]() Rush ![]() sorry ![]() Zeus ![]() Sea.KH ![]() Killer ![]() TY ![]() Movie ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() [sc1f]eonzerg ![]() PianO ![]() JYJ36 sSak ![]() Aegong ![]() Sharp ![]() scan(afreeca) ![]() ![]() sas.Sziky ![]() Terrorterran ![]() SilentControl ![]() IntoTheRainbow ![]() ivOry ![]() Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games singsing2012 B2W.Neo1694 hiko1096 Beastyqt905 Lowko468 crisheroes451 Fuzer ![]() XaKoH ![]() ArmadaUGS102 KnowMe71 QueenE45 ZerO(Twitch)17 Organizations |
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Stormgate Nexus
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
[ Show More ] RSL Revival
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
|
|