|
|
|
I saw your post and your other but this isn't a livefeed like the one i linked. I'm looking for complete livefeed that have a timeline.
EDIT : oh ok, it is one. Opera wasn't loading properly the iframe with the feed
|
Symbolically and in its effect, it might be really close indeed. And we are not talking about the death toll, obviously, but about a terror attack that leave the country traumatized and changes it forever.
|
I need to create a twitter account then. thanks.
Surprised by the 9/11 title from Le monde but even if it's not comparable, it's because it's the most casualties from terrorism since almost 50 years.
|
It is rumored that the author is entrenched in Montrouge, nothing confirmed.
Journalists are held by police at more than 100m from the BRI now. (brigade recherche et intervention = assault force)
|
I think LeMonde doesn't talk about the number of killings, but just like 9/11 of the USA and Utøya of Norway robbed those countries of the mentality of terror being something that happened far away, this could very well be the same for France.
|
FFW_Rude I just gave you about 10 newsfeed.
|
On January 08 2015 19:08 Ishentar wrote: FFW_Rude I just gave you about 10 newsfeed.
A lot of them weren't loading properly in opera. I thought they were just articles, that's why i asked again. But i changed my browser since you were posting the same thing and it worked. Thank you.
|
On January 08 2015 19:03 Biff The Understudy wrote:Symbolically and in its effect, it might be really close indeed. And we are not talking about the death toll, obviously, but about a terror attack that leave the country traumatized and changes it forever.
There is probably more that separates the two than they have in common. It's convenient rhetoric though. That's not to make light of the situation but they are dramatically different in scope, scale, significance, among many other important factors.
If this was France 9/11 then what would it be if there was actually an attack that was really comparable?
|
|
Two BRIs (SWATs like force) are at 2 different locations, heavily armed, in case an assault is needed, in Arcueuil and Montrouge.
|
5 people in custody in REIMS. Friends or family of the two older shooters
|
Thanks for the updates guys.
|
ffs our police need to be stronger
|
Policemen are moving right now. Soon out of journaist's sight.
|
The suspects of the yesterday shooting are believed to be localized in Aisne. (Lefigaro.fr)
|
On January 08 2015 19:10 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 19:03 Biff The Understudy wrote:Symbolically and in its effect, it might be really close indeed. And we are not talking about the death toll, obviously, but about a terror attack that leave the country traumatized and changes it forever. There is probably more that separates the two than they have in common. It's convenient rhetoric though. That's not to make light of the situation but they are dramatically different in scope, scale, significance, among many other important factors. If this was France 9/11 then what would it be if there was actually an attack that was really comparable? Look, of course you are right. What Le Monde says is that there will be a "before" and an "after", just as it has been with 11/9. That's it. If you want, "11/9" is used in that context as "a terror attack that changes everything from the day it happens". That's pretty much it. You can think that "a terror attack that changes everything" shouldn't be called an "11/9" because an 11/9 is when four planes are diverted and kill 4000 people, and maybe you are right, but I don't think it's a big deal.
|
For french readers :
www.lefigaro.fr
It explains how to report disturbing content found on the net. Like stupid stuff on facebook, twitter, etc. About what is happening.
I'm really not a figaro reader but for once they provide something smart...
|
On January 08 2015 19:20 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 19:10 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 08 2015 19:03 Biff The Understudy wrote:Symbolically and in its effect, it might be really close indeed. And we are not talking about the death toll, obviously, but about a terror attack that leave the country traumatized and changes it forever. There is probably more that separates the two than they have in common. It's convenient rhetoric though. That's not to make light of the situation but they are dramatically different in scope, scale, significance, among many other important factors. If this was France 9/11 then what would it be if there was actually an attack that was really comparable? Look, of course you are right. What Le Monde says is that there will be a "before" and an "after", just as it has been with 11/9. That's it. If you want, "11/9" is used in that context as "a terror attack that changes everything from the day it happens". That's pretty much it. You can think that "a terror attack that changes everything" shouldn't be called an "11/9" because an 11/9 is when four planes are diverted and kill 4000 people, and maybe you are right, but I don't think it's a big deal.
The problem is that, per usual, mainstream media will over abuse of this comparison. And the numbers are really not the same.
|
On January 08 2015 19:21 Furikawari wrote:For french readers : www.lefigaro.frIt explains how to report disturbing content found on the net. Like stupid stuff on facebook, twitter, etc. About what is happening. I'm really not a figaro reader but for once they provide something smart...
Yeah good stuff, condoning or agitating for violence and hatred is criminal offence in many countries. And even if its not in some particular cases it helps intelligence agencies to put people on their radar.
|
|
|
|