• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:10
CEST 22:10
KST 05:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting7[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO65.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)79Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition325.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)119
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting How to Block Australia, Brazil, Singapore Servers Revisiting the game after10 years and wow it's bad The New Patch Killed Mech!
Tourneys
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
[Interview] Grrrr... 2024 Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game BW caster Sayle BW General Discussion Map with fog of war removed for one player?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B [ASL20] Semifinal A SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Relatively freeroll strategies Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640} TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Inbreeding: Why Do We Do It…
Peanutsc
From Tilt to Ragequit:The Ps…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1453 users

Eurovision song contest 2014 - Page 15

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 All
Monsen
Profile Joined December 2002
Germany2548 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-12 12:39:39
May 12 2014 12:37 GMT
#281
On May 12 2014 07:57 ZenithM wrote:
I'm proud of France's results.


I actually liked their song. That guy with the hair and the basecap was hilarious.
I wonder if France just gets punished for their annoying refusal to speak the same language everyone else uses at the contest.

edit: talking about the guys reporting the votes, not the song itself-
11 years and counting- TL #680
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
May 12 2014 14:46 GMT
#282
On May 12 2014 21:37 Monsen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2014 07:57 ZenithM wrote:
I'm proud of France's results.


I actually liked their song. That guy with the hair and the basecap was hilarious.
I wonder if France just gets punished for their annoying refusal to speak the same language everyone else uses at the contest.

edit: talking about the guys reporting the votes, not the song itself-

Yeah I think the fact that nobody understands what the heck the song is saying doesn't help ;D
BaneRiders
Profile Joined August 2013
Sweden3630 Posts
May 12 2014 19:18 GMT
#283
On May 12 2014 08:53 L1ghtning wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2014 00:02 Appendix wrote:
On May 11 2014 21:41 L1ghtning wrote:
On May 11 2014 09:17 karfussen wrote:
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/results?event=1893&voter=GB

Here you can check detailed results. Look for example at United Kingdom, Norway, Netherlands or Austria - viewers liked Polish tits but jury hated them

How the results would look if only televoting votes were counted: here

Poland 5th place by voting. What's wrong with ppl? It was surely the worst song in the finals. Yeah, I get it if you appreciated their "show" for obvious reasons, but why waste your money on voting on that musical torture?

I'm generally a bit sceptical towards having a jury, mainly because it only consists of 5 ppl, but as long as they do a better job than the televoters, they deserve to stay. Hungary only got 10th place by televotes, and they had the song with probably the best musical arrangements. Thankfully the jury was knowledgeable enough about music to elevate it up to 5th place total. That's why the jury is a good thing. If quality doesn't get recognized, and songs like Poland's song gets recognition instead of Hungary's song, then more and more serious songwriters will just opt out, which will make the competition into more of a farce than it already is.


I find the notion that there should be a jury in case of people voting wrong to be silly. Let the most popular song win and don't go by some arbitrary measure like technique. Eurovision has always been as much about the show as the actual singing, and as long as it has the big audience it has serious songwriters won't opt out because some sense of pride.

I don't think the jury ranks the songs arbitrarily. The main difference is that they invest much more into the songs than the average voter does, plus, all of them are involved in the music industry, so they have more refined tastes on average, which generally means they are more open-minded to styles that may not be that mainstream. The jury's voting is how the general public would vote, if they devoted as much time to the songs, and were as knowledgeable about music as the jury is. Well, that's what the jury strives for, and obviously that's not always what you get, but since they incorporated the jury I have always agreed a bit more with the jury than with the televoters, despite its flaws.


What you say makes sense if the jury and the population at large would judge for example new compositions of Bela Bartok or similar music that certainly is difficult to enjoy first time you listen to it, but the whole point of ESC is to find out the most popular mainstream music for the mainstream. Sophisticated compositions need not bother.
Earth, Water, Air and Protoss!
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5647 Posts
May 12 2014 19:41 GMT
#284
On May 12 2014 21:37 Monsen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2014 07:57 ZenithM wrote:
I'm proud of France's results.


I actually liked their song. That guy with the hair and the basecap was hilarious.
I wonder if France just gets punished for their annoying refusal to speak the same language everyone else uses at the contest.

edit: talking about the guys reporting the votes, not the song itself-


I would very much appreciate it if singing in your national language in ESC was the norm. It's not like we're not bombarded with American music everyday... Having nearly all songs in English is so bland. :< An easy solution to not being able to understand the lyrics would be having them translated so that people can familiarize themselves with them.
Derez
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Netherlands6068 Posts
May 12 2014 19:48 GMT
#285
On May 13 2014 04:18 BaneRiders wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2014 08:53 L1ghtning wrote:
On May 12 2014 00:02 Appendix wrote:
On May 11 2014 21:41 L1ghtning wrote:
On May 11 2014 09:17 karfussen wrote:
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/results?event=1893&voter=GB

Here you can check detailed results. Look for example at United Kingdom, Norway, Netherlands or Austria - viewers liked Polish tits but jury hated them

How the results would look if only televoting votes were counted: here

Poland 5th place by voting. What's wrong with ppl? It was surely the worst song in the finals. Yeah, I get it if you appreciated their "show" for obvious reasons, but why waste your money on voting on that musical torture?

I'm generally a bit sceptical towards having a jury, mainly because it only consists of 5 ppl, but as long as they do a better job than the televoters, they deserve to stay. Hungary only got 10th place by televotes, and they had the song with probably the best musical arrangements. Thankfully the jury was knowledgeable enough about music to elevate it up to 5th place total. That's why the jury is a good thing. If quality doesn't get recognized, and songs like Poland's song gets recognition instead of Hungary's song, then more and more serious songwriters will just opt out, which will make the competition into more of a farce than it already is.


I find the notion that there should be a jury in case of people voting wrong to be silly. Let the most popular song win and don't go by some arbitrary measure like technique. Eurovision has always been as much about the show as the actual singing, and as long as it has the big audience it has serious songwriters won't opt out because some sense of pride.

I don't think the jury ranks the songs arbitrarily. The main difference is that they invest much more into the songs than the average voter does, plus, all of them are involved in the music industry, so they have more refined tastes on average, which generally means they are more open-minded to styles that may not be that mainstream. The jury's voting is how the general public would vote, if they devoted as much time to the songs, and were as knowledgeable about music as the jury is. Well, that's what the jury strives for, and obviously that's not always what you get, but since they incorporated the jury I have always agreed a bit more with the jury than with the televoters, despite its flaws.


What you say makes sense if the jury and the population at large would judge for example new compositions of Bela Bartok or similar music that certainly is difficult to enjoy first time you listen to it, but the whole point of ESC is to find out the most popular mainstream music for the mainstream. Sophisticated compositions need not bother.

I'm not sure where you get the impression that eurovision has anything to do with popular mainstream music. The people that vote are not 'mainstream', it tends to be biased quite heavily to, for example, the gay community. There's nothing wrong with that but if you were to look at what is truly popular music by any objective standard (let's say album sales EU wide, downloads, or streaming plays) you wouldn't find any of them in the top 50.
BaneRiders
Profile Joined August 2013
Sweden3630 Posts
May 12 2014 20:20 GMT
#286
On May 13 2014 04:48 Derez wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2014 04:18 BaneRiders wrote:
On May 12 2014 08:53 L1ghtning wrote:
On May 12 2014 00:02 Appendix wrote:
On May 11 2014 21:41 L1ghtning wrote:
On May 11 2014 09:17 karfussen wrote:
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/results?event=1893&voter=GB

Here you can check detailed results. Look for example at United Kingdom, Norway, Netherlands or Austria - viewers liked Polish tits but jury hated them

How the results would look if only televoting votes were counted: here

Poland 5th place by voting. What's wrong with ppl? It was surely the worst song in the finals. Yeah, I get it if you appreciated their "show" for obvious reasons, but why waste your money on voting on that musical torture?

I'm generally a bit sceptical towards having a jury, mainly because it only consists of 5 ppl, but as long as they do a better job than the televoters, they deserve to stay. Hungary only got 10th place by televotes, and they had the song with probably the best musical arrangements. Thankfully the jury was knowledgeable enough about music to elevate it up to 5th place total. That's why the jury is a good thing. If quality doesn't get recognized, and songs like Poland's song gets recognition instead of Hungary's song, then more and more serious songwriters will just opt out, which will make the competition into more of a farce than it already is.


I find the notion that there should be a jury in case of people voting wrong to be silly. Let the most popular song win and don't go by some arbitrary measure like technique. Eurovision has always been as much about the show as the actual singing, and as long as it has the big audience it has serious songwriters won't opt out because some sense of pride.

I don't think the jury ranks the songs arbitrarily. The main difference is that they invest much more into the songs than the average voter does, plus, all of them are involved in the music industry, so they have more refined tastes on average, which generally means they are more open-minded to styles that may not be that mainstream. The jury's voting is how the general public would vote, if they devoted as much time to the songs, and were as knowledgeable about music as the jury is. Well, that's what the jury strives for, and obviously that's not always what you get, but since they incorporated the jury I have always agreed a bit more with the jury than with the televoters, despite its flaws.


What you say makes sense if the jury and the population at large would judge for example new compositions of Bela Bartok or similar music that certainly is difficult to enjoy first time you listen to it, but the whole point of ESC is to find out the most popular mainstream music for the mainstream. Sophisticated compositions need not bother.

I'm not sure where you get the impression that eurovision has anything to do with popular mainstream music. The people that vote are not 'mainstream', it tends to be biased quite heavily to, for example, the gay community. There's nothing wrong with that but if you were to look at what is truly popular music by any objective standard (let's say album sales EU wide, downloads, or streaming plays) you wouldn't find any of them in the top 50.


Ah well, I suppose that is a good point. Why are no ESC contributions on the lists? Because the ESC music is too complicated to become popular in the mainstream or simply too bad? Or because it is marketed differently than other music? I must confess I'm not very into this whole ESC exercise and I watched it last Saturday more by chance. I do recognize that the whole ESC has gotten incredible media coverage, at least in Sweden, for many years now.
Earth, Water, Air and Protoss!
maartendq
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Belgium3115 Posts
May 12 2014 22:07 GMT
#287
Unsurprisingly, the most attention-grabbing 'artist' won. ESC feels more like a contest between marketing firms than a music contest nowadays. These songs are written by specialists and the artists are marketed according to how eccentric they look.
Zetter
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Germany629 Posts
May 12 2014 22:20 GMT
#288
On May 13 2014 07:07 maartendq wrote:
Unsurprisingly, the most attention-grabbing 'artist' won. ESC feels more like a contest between marketing firms than a music contest nowadays. These songs are written by specialists and the artists are marketed according to how eccentric they look.


Nowadays? ESC has always been about the show, not about the music. It's simply a necessity considering it's on TV. I don't understand people who say this ruins the integrity of ESC.
Mendici sumus. Hoc est verum. | I don't mind straight people, as long as they act gay in public. | Es ist keine Tugend edel geboren werden, sondern sich edel machen | οἶδα οὐκ εἰδώς
tadL
Profile Joined September 2010
Croatia679 Posts
May 12 2014 22:43 GMT
#289
Only question that matters. Is the winner hot?
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
May 12 2014 22:49 GMT
#290
On May 13 2014 07:20 Zetter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2014 07:07 maartendq wrote:
Unsurprisingly, the most attention-grabbing 'artist' won. ESC feels more like a contest between marketing firms than a music contest nowadays. These songs are written by specialists and the artists are marketed according to how eccentric they look.


Nowadays? ESC has always been about the show, not about the music. It's simply a necessity considering it's on TV. I don't understand people who say this ruins the integrity of ESC.


The brothers Olsen who won it for Denmark some years ago didn't exactly have a great show - their song however was extremely well written (for an ESC). There have been times where song quality was the most important.
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10784 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-12 22:57:16
May 12 2014 22:55 GMT
#291
Honestly the winning song is ok, i don't get the hate.
Would it have won when not sung by a bearded woman? Probably not.
Did you expect some GREAT song out of the eurovision song contest? Probably not. Every decade there is like one actually great song but in general? Its just a streamlined pop ballad or even "pure" fun/trash.

Its a show and some "artist" that delivered a show won.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17378 Posts
May 12 2014 23:49 GMT
#292
[image loading]
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
BaneRiders
Profile Joined August 2013
Sweden3630 Posts
May 13 2014 20:27 GMT
#293
Jury votes vs Televoting was published today for Austria in Der Standard:

http://derstandard.at/1399507276850/Eurovision-Wer-stimmte-fuer-wen

The interesting finding is that the various juries gave Austria everything from 1st spot (9 juries) to 24th (2 juries) and the jury votes are in general much more spread than the televotes that had Austria between 1st and 5th (with the exception of Estonia who put Austria in 8th). So with just the sample of Austria, the televoters all over Europe turned out to be rather of one mind as opposed to the juries. Funny that, eh?
Earth, Water, Air and Protoss!
L1ghtning
Profile Joined July 2013
Sweden353 Posts
May 13 2014 21:20 GMT
#294
On May 13 2014 07:55 Velr wrote:
Honestly the winning song is ok, i don't get the hate.
Would it have won when not sung by a bearded woman? Probably not.
Did you expect some GREAT song out of the eurovision song contest? Probably not. Every decade there is like one actually great song but in general? Its just a streamlined pop ballad or even "pure" fun/trash.

Its a show and some "artist" that delivered a show won.

What you're basically saying is that Sweden would have won if the austrian singer had participated as "himself", rather than as his Conchita Wurst persona.
Sweden had the other strong power ballad in the competition, and Austria losing enough points to lose the lead most likely would have given Sweden more than enough points to pass the Netherlands (and Austria).

So the question is, was Sweden's song better than Austria's song? I don't think so, although I think it was pretty close. After seeing the finals I thought it was between Austria and Sweden. They were not necessarily my favourites, although I like both songs, but I thought they were the only songs that were strong enough and accessible enough to win.

Austria would have been the odds favourite if it weren't for the fact that certain groups of ppl (who tends to be in abundance in the media) still thinks that we're living in the 19th century.


Anyway, the Netherlands getting 2nd position should be proof enough that standing out means squat. Yeah, they stood out, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, they stood out by not having a show. And you just have to take a look at the winners in previous years. Very few of them stood out, the one I can think of is Loreen, but that performance was very well choreographed and had a lot of artistic merit.
Prev 1 13 14 15 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 51m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 200
BRAT_OK 102
Railgan 64
MindelVK 24
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18349
Calm 3352
Larva 472
EffOrt 350
NaDa 6
Dota 2
Pyrionflax190
canceldota52
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps403
Foxcn287
PGG 50
Other Games
Grubby3127
ScreaM1315
fl0m805
ToD174
C9.Mang0170
crisheroes152
Hui .95
ArmadaUGS82
Dewaltoss26
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 23
• davetesta20
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 24
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift2069
• TFBlade917
Other Games
• imaqtpie2008
• Shiphtur328
• WagamamaTV243
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
14h 51m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 13h
Safe House 2
1d 20h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Safe House 2
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.