• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:02
CET 19:02
KST 03:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT28Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2
StarCraft 2
General
Buy high-quality undetectable fake counterfeit USD Buy Weed In Sydney telegram @greenplug420 Terran AddOns placement How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
Recent recommended BW games It's March 3rd Soma Explains: JD's Unrelenting Aggro vs FlaSh TvZ is the most complete match up BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement The Casual Games of the Week Thread [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Online Quake Live Config Editor Tool Diablo 2 thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Just Watchers: Why Some Only…
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2904 users

UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 611

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 609 610 611 612 613 645 Next
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note.

Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon.

All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22115 Posts
January 19 2023 19:11 GMT
#12201
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
January 20 2023 07:40 GMT
#12202
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9776 Posts
January 20 2023 14:29 GMT
#12203
On January 20 2023 16:40 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.

The difference is that we're taking significant steps backwards.
Anti-union laws, anti-protest laws, constant giving of new powers to police, The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes etc.
RIP Meatloaf <3
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
January 20 2023 18:34 GMT
#12204
On January 20 2023 23:29 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2023 16:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.

The difference is that we're taking significant steps backwards.
Anti-union laws, anti-protest laws, constant giving of new powers to police, The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes etc.

I reckon the government is only going ahead with this stuff now because they know they will lose the election next year. If Labour don't reverse this crap then I will worry. I don't expect progress to always be smooth.

But still, I don't think this makes it appropriate to call the UK a hellhole, a nightmare, a shit country, or for plasmid to say they hope the country disintegrates. That was my initial point. People can make their arguments without resorting to such insults. As the mod note says:
All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-23 23:38:07
January 23 2023 23:37 GMT
#12205
On January 21 2023 03:34 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2023 23:29 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 20 2023 16:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.

The difference is that we're taking significant steps backwards.
Anti-union laws, anti-protest laws, constant giving of new powers to police, The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes etc.

I reckon the government is only going ahead with this stuff now because they know they will lose the election next year. If Labour don't reverse this crap then I will worry. I don't expect progress to always be smooth.

But still, I don't think this makes it appropriate to call the UK a hellhole, a nightmare, a shit country, or for plasmid to say they hope the country disintegrates. That was my initial point. People can make their arguments without resorting to such insults. As the mod note says:
Show nested quote +
All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

I 100% stand by what I said. The UK Tory government, the Labour Party, UK institutions like the EHRC, and the entire UK media, including the BBC, actively makes the lives of people like me unimaginably horrible. Every single one of my trans friends hates it in the UK and is trying to get out. I've already lost so many friends to suicide from the absolute cruelty perpetuated in that country, including manufactured healthcare waitlists of over seven years. Now that Starmer's bent the knee to the openly neo-Nazi transphobes in the country, there is no path future for the UK, and therefore to save as many people in my community as possible, it needs to dissolve.
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43622 Posts
January 24 2023 00:11 GMT
#12206
On January 24 2023 08:37 plasmidghost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2023 03:34 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 23:29 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 20 2023 16:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.

The difference is that we're taking significant steps backwards.
Anti-union laws, anti-protest laws, constant giving of new powers to police, The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes etc.

I reckon the government is only going ahead with this stuff now because they know they will lose the election next year. If Labour don't reverse this crap then I will worry. I don't expect progress to always be smooth.

But still, I don't think this makes it appropriate to call the UK a hellhole, a nightmare, a shit country, or for plasmid to say they hope the country disintegrates. That was my initial point. People can make their arguments without resorting to such insults. As the mod note says:
All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

I 100% stand by what I said. The UK Tory government, the Labour Party, UK institutions like the EHRC, and the entire UK media, including the BBC, actively makes the lives of people like me unimaginably horrible. Every single one of my trans friends hates it in the UK and is trying to get out. I've already lost so many friends to suicide from the absolute cruelty perpetuated in that country, including manufactured healthcare waitlists of over seven years. Now that Starmer's bent the knee to the openly neo-Nazi transphobes in the country, there is no path future for the UK, and therefore to save as many people in my community as possible, it needs to dissolve.

Well at least you’re keeping things in proportion and avoiding hysterical hyperbole.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
justanothertownie
Profile Joined July 2013
16322 Posts
January 24 2023 07:52 GMT
#12207
On January 24 2023 08:37 plasmidghost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2023 03:34 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 23:29 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 20 2023 16:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.

The difference is that we're taking significant steps backwards.
Anti-union laws, anti-protest laws, constant giving of new powers to police, The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes etc.

I reckon the government is only going ahead with this stuff now because they know they will lose the election next year. If Labour don't reverse this crap then I will worry. I don't expect progress to always be smooth.

But still, I don't think this makes it appropriate to call the UK a hellhole, a nightmare, a shit country, or for plasmid to say they hope the country disintegrates. That was my initial point. People can make their arguments without resorting to such insults. As the mod note says:
All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

I 100% stand by what I said. The UK Tory government, the Labour Party, UK institutions like the EHRC, and the entire UK media, including the BBC, actively makes the lives of people like me unimaginably horrible. Every single one of my trans friends hates it in the UK and is trying to get out. I've already lost so many friends to suicide from the absolute cruelty perpetuated in that country, including manufactured healthcare waitlists of over seven years. Now that Starmer's bent the knee to the openly neo-Nazi transphobes in the country, there is no path future for the UK, and therefore to save as many people in my community as possible, it needs to dissolve.

Why aren't your friends leaving then? Seems like a much easier and more realistic solution then to dissolve a whole state...
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-24 09:38:17
January 24 2023 09:35 GMT
#12208
On January 24 2023 16:52 justanothertownie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2023 08:37 plasmidghost wrote:
On January 21 2023 03:34 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 23:29 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 20 2023 16:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 20 2023 04:11 Gorsameth wrote:
Saying your better then Saudi Arabia or Russia is hardly an achievement, Certainly fits with the level England seems to be striving for post Brexit tho.

Your government wanted to abolish striking, seems pretty easy to throw them in the 'shit country' bin with positions like that.

I used those examples to make it obvious just how hyperbolic and insulting it is to call the UK a hellhole and a nightmare. The UK is not comparable to those countries, especially when it comes to LGBT rights or the right to protest.

The difference is that we're taking significant steps backwards.
Anti-union laws, anti-protest laws, constant giving of new powers to police, The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes etc.

I reckon the government is only going ahead with this stuff now because they know they will lose the election next year. If Labour don't reverse this crap then I will worry. I don't expect progress to always be smooth.

But still, I don't think this makes it appropriate to call the UK a hellhole, a nightmare, a shit country, or for plasmid to say they hope the country disintegrates. That was my initial point. People can make their arguments without resorting to such insults. As the mod note says:
All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

I 100% stand by what I said. The UK Tory government, the Labour Party, UK institutions like the EHRC, and the entire UK media, including the BBC, actively makes the lives of people like me unimaginably horrible. Every single one of my trans friends hates it in the UK and is trying to get out. I've already lost so many friends to suicide from the absolute cruelty perpetuated in that country, including manufactured healthcare waitlists of over seven years. Now that Starmer's bent the knee to the openly neo-Nazi transphobes in the country, there is no path future for the UK, and therefore to save as many people in my community as possible, it needs to dissolve.

Why aren't your friends leaving then? Seems like a much easier and more realistic solution then to dissolve a whole state...

Lot harder to do now that the UK left the EU, not to mention that most of them are pretty poor. Being trans makes finding jobs that aren't shit significantly harder so a lot of us get stuck scraping the bottom of the barrel in pay. Now that the UK's cost of living has skyrocketed, it's become even harder for them to save any money to get out. It's a shit situation there and I don't want them to suffer without a chance of getting out.

Right now, though, the UK is actively moving severely backwards for not just trans people but pretty much everyone that isn't some rich Tory donor, and I don't know when it'll stop because the current Labour Party does not have policies to address this should they come into power next year or January 2025. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland do not have the population to do anything to stop England from controlling the entire UK and I don't want to see them dragged down by the Tories.
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26303 Posts
January 24 2023 19:17 GMT
#12209
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9776 Posts
January 25 2023 13:09 GMT
#12210
Here's some absolutely shocking behaviour from the UK government:
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/prigozhin-government-russia-ukraine-hack-libel-slapp/



The UK government helped the boss of Russia’s murderous mercenary army to circumvent its own sanctions and launch a targeted legal attack on a British journalist, openDemocracy can reveal.

Yevgeny Prigozhin is the founder of Wagner, a private army that the US government last week announced it would designate a “transnational criminal organisation”, allowing it to impose even tougher sanctions on the group. For years it has been accused of human rights abuses and war crimes in Ukraine and across the world in support of Putin’s regime.

Sanctions introduced in the UK and Europe in 2020 were supposed to prevent anyone from doing business with Prigozhin. He had also been sanctioned in the US in 2018.

But a vast cache of hacked emails shows that, under the leadership of Rishi Sunak, the UK Treasury issued special licences in 2021 to let the oligarch override sanctions and launch an aggressive legal campaign against a journalist in the London courts.



This government seems determined to clamp down on all civil rights for everyone as much as they possibly can right now.
RIP Meatloaf <3
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom1401 Posts
January 25 2023 16:19 GMT
#12211
On January 25 2023 22:09 Jockmcplop wrote:
Here's some absolutely shocking behaviour from the UK government:
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/prigozhin-government-russia-ukraine-hack-libel-slapp/



Show nested quote +
The UK government helped the boss of Russia’s murderous mercenary army to circumvent its own sanctions and launch a targeted legal attack on a British journalist, openDemocracy can reveal.

Yevgeny Prigozhin is the founder of Wagner, a private army that the US government last week announced it would designate a “transnational criminal organisation”, allowing it to impose even tougher sanctions on the group. For years it has been accused of human rights abuses and war crimes in Ukraine and across the world in support of Putin’s regime.

Sanctions introduced in the UK and Europe in 2020 were supposed to prevent anyone from doing business with Prigozhin. He had also been sanctioned in the US in 2018.

But a vast cache of hacked emails shows that, under the leadership of Rishi Sunak, the UK Treasury issued special licences in 2021 to let the oligarch override sanctions and launch an aggressive legal campaign against a journalist in the London courts.



This government seems determined to clamp down on all civil rights for everyone as much as they possibly can right now.

Less sensationalist source for balance: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64400057
puking up frothing vitriolic sarcastic spittle
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9776 Posts
January 25 2023 17:41 GMT
#12212
On January 26 2023 01:19 MJG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2023 22:09 Jockmcplop wrote:
Here's some absolutely shocking behaviour from the UK government:
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/prigozhin-government-russia-ukraine-hack-libel-slapp/



The UK government helped the boss of Russia’s murderous mercenary army to circumvent its own sanctions and launch a targeted legal attack on a British journalist, openDemocracy can reveal.

Yevgeny Prigozhin is the founder of Wagner, a private army that the US government last week announced it would designate a “transnational criminal organisation”, allowing it to impose even tougher sanctions on the group. For years it has been accused of human rights abuses and war crimes in Ukraine and across the world in support of Putin’s regime.

Sanctions introduced in the UK and Europe in 2020 were supposed to prevent anyone from doing business with Prigozhin. He had also been sanctioned in the US in 2018.

But a vast cache of hacked emails shows that, under the leadership of Rishi Sunak, the UK Treasury issued special licences in 2021 to let the oligarch override sanctions and launch an aggressive legal campaign against a journalist in the London courts.



This government seems determined to clamp down on all civil rights for everyone as much as they possibly can right now.

Less sensationalist source for balance: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64400057


Thanks for that!
I try to use decent sources but couldn't find any when i posted this.
RIP Meatloaf <3
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
January 26 2023 13:40 GMT
#12213
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9776 Posts
January 26 2023 15:52 GMT
#12214
On January 26 2023 22:40 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Show nested quote +
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.

Well if the anti-trans hate movement are so sensitive they would genuinely be offended by harsh language such as 'idiot' then maybe they should grow up a little.
Its not like people are trying to legislate them out of existence.
RIP Meatloaf <3
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
January 26 2023 18:06 GMT
#12215
On January 27 2023 00:52 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 22:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.

Well if the anti-trans hate movement are so sensitive they would genuinely be offended by harsh language such as 'idiot' then maybe they should grow up a little.
Its not like people are trying to legislate them out of existence.

And this is exactly what I was talking about. Not everyone who voices a concern about self-identification or the GRR are part of an "anti-trans hate movement" and want to legislate trans people out of existence.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9776 Posts
January 26 2023 18:23 GMT
#12216
On January 27 2023 03:06 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2023 00:52 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 26 2023 22:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.

Well if the anti-trans hate movement are so sensitive they would genuinely be offended by harsh language such as 'idiot' then maybe they should grow up a little.
Its not like people are trying to legislate them out of existence.

And this is exactly what I was talking about. Not everyone who voices a concern about self-identification or the GRR are part of an "anti-trans hate movement" and want to legislate trans people out of existence.

Sometimes you hear an argument too often from people who go on to prove it incorrect.
I heard this from the so called feminist groups who took money from anti-abortion activists in America to fight and lobby against ANY expansion of trans rights in the UK, regardless of their exact nature. They were apparently just concerned about the effect on women.
I heard it from Graham Linehan who was just a concerned liberal apparently before going on some very extreme hate filled rants about trans people.
In fact, every single time someone is caught showing the extremity of their hatred for trans people, they pull out this same line of reasoning 'I'm not extreme, I'm just so concerned about trans people having rights.'
RIP Meatloaf <3
Melliflue
Profile Joined October 2012
United Kingdom1389 Posts
January 26 2023 19:21 GMT
#12217
On January 27 2023 03:23 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2023 03:06 Melliflue wrote:
On January 27 2023 00:52 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 26 2023 22:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.

Well if the anti-trans hate movement are so sensitive they would genuinely be offended by harsh language such as 'idiot' then maybe they should grow up a little.
Its not like people are trying to legislate them out of existence.

And this is exactly what I was talking about. Not everyone who voices a concern about self-identification or the GRR are part of an "anti-trans hate movement" and want to legislate trans people out of existence.

Sometimes you hear an argument too often from people who go on to prove it incorrect.
I heard this from the so called feminist groups who took money from anti-abortion activists in America to fight and lobby against ANY expansion of trans rights in the UK, regardless of their exact nature. They were apparently just concerned about the effect on women.
I heard it from Graham Linehan who was just a concerned liberal apparently before going on some very extreme hate filled rants about trans people.
In fact, every single time someone is caught showing the extremity of their hatred for trans people, they pull out this same line of reasoning 'I'm not extreme, I'm just so concerned about trans people having rights.'

But there are so many quiet people who do wonder about some issues and will hear someone voicing a seemingly valid concern only to be insulted and those quiet people are going to feel insulted too. Normal, kind, people get scared to voice an opinion on these issues and then they listen to the only people who seem to care about those issues - those who are trying to exploit the issue or who are actually horrible people.

I believe this happened with the Brexit referendum too. I am extremely pro-EU and think we should rejoin, but I know many pro-leave people irl and it was clear to me that they felt the pro-EU side wasn't listening or caring. They became defensive and reinforced their anti-EU feelings when they thought that pro-leave people were being insulted and personally attacked by pro-EU people, with the whole 'Brexiters are stupid and/or racist' attitude.

I see the same thing happening with transgender rights now. I believe it is understandable to be scared of convicted sex offenders being allowed into women's only spaces. Instead of name-calling, we should explain the safeguards that exist to stop that from happening.

Moreover, I worry that when we over-use words like 'transphobe' we risk making it a less impactful word. I think this has happened with 'racist'. That word has been thrown around so much over the last few years that being called a 'racist' for many people is not as bad as it used to be because they think that some people are "over-sensitive" and will call almost anyone a 'racist'.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9776 Posts
January 26 2023 19:41 GMT
#12218
On January 27 2023 04:21 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2023 03:23 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 27 2023 03:06 Melliflue wrote:
On January 27 2023 00:52 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 26 2023 22:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.

Well if the anti-trans hate movement are so sensitive they would genuinely be offended by harsh language such as 'idiot' then maybe they should grow up a little.
Its not like people are trying to legislate them out of existence.

And this is exactly what I was talking about. Not everyone who voices a concern about self-identification or the GRR are part of an "anti-trans hate movement" and want to legislate trans people out of existence.

Sometimes you hear an argument too often from people who go on to prove it incorrect.
I heard this from the so called feminist groups who took money from anti-abortion activists in America to fight and lobby against ANY expansion of trans rights in the UK, regardless of their exact nature. They were apparently just concerned about the effect on women.
I heard it from Graham Linehan who was just a concerned liberal apparently before going on some very extreme hate filled rants about trans people.
In fact, every single time someone is caught showing the extremity of their hatred for trans people, they pull out this same line of reasoning 'I'm not extreme, I'm just so concerned about trans people having rights.'

But there are so many quiet people who do wonder about some issues and will hear someone voicing a seemingly valid concern only to be insulted and those quiet people are going to feel insulted too. Normal, kind, people get scared to voice an opinion on these issues and then they listen to the only people who seem to care about those issues - those who are trying to exploit the issue or who are actually horrible people.

I believe this happened with the Brexit referendum too. I am extremely pro-EU and think we should rejoin, but I know many pro-leave people irl and it was clear to me that they felt the pro-EU side wasn't listening or caring. They became defensive and reinforced their anti-EU feelings when they thought that pro-leave people were being insulted and personally attacked by pro-EU people, with the whole 'Brexiters are stupid and/or racist' attitude.

I see the same thing happening with transgender rights now. I believe it is understandable to be scared of convicted sex offenders being allowed into women's only spaces. Instead of name-calling, we should explain the safeguards that exist to stop that from happening.

Moreover, I worry that when we over-use words like 'transphobe' we risk making it a less impactful word. I think this has happened with 'racist'. That word has been thrown around so much over the last few years that being called a 'racist' for many people is not as bad as it used to be because they think that some people are "over-sensitive" and will call almost anyone a 'racist'.


The thing is the quiet people who wonder about issues are not the people the tories are trying to win votes off with their attacks. Its the people who are so backward in their thinking and so insecure in their own self that they have to attack anyone who is different from them.
Its very easy to tell the difference between the two groups.
Remember this is not me trying to convince someone of something, its me pointing out the way our government works, what their priorities are, and how people are victimised by them playing on the fear and insecurity of the idiot vote.
Logically what you're saying makes sense, but i'm not going to tread on eggshells to avoid upsetting people who, if they're upset by that, i don't have any chance of getting through to anyway. I could do, and it wouldn't take much, if any, effort on my part to be more respectful of these people, but i've dealt with enough of them that i quite enjoy calling them morons, because they are, and i don't think anyone should take anything I say seriously enough to expect that me doing so would have any consequences at all on the quiet wonderers.
RIP Meatloaf <3
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23671 Posts
January 26 2023 19:52 GMT
#12219
On January 27 2023 04:21 Melliflue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2023 03:23 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 27 2023 03:06 Melliflue wrote:
On January 27 2023 00:52 Jockmcplop wrote:
On January 26 2023 22:40 Melliflue wrote:
On January 25 2023 04:17 WombaT wrote:
Gold standard on the issue? Absolutely not, but comparatively is the UK all that bad on trans issues? I mean, in absolute terms there's a good distance to go in this area, yeah absolutely. A generally shitter trajectory than many comparable places so issues that are more generic/universal, be it healthcare waiting lists or growing poverty have a devastating impact on a particular demograpihc? Yeah can't really argue with that.

Weaponising and over-inflating trans issues seems to be the go-to current strategy of right-wing charlatans the world over, the UK isn't exactly unique in that domain, and I'd assume the general populace is more receptive to trans emancipation than many places too.

Hey, won't find me defending much of my country's direction in the last 5/10 years but even then I wouldn't go quite as far as dystopian hellhole.

I know there are people on the right who will exploit such issues but I fear it is the combative attitude of many progressives that will prevent them from getting meaningful political influence.

This discussion started with the GRR in Scotland so I will use self-identification as an example. Overall I support self-identification, but I understand the fear that sex offenders will pretend to be transgender to access women-only spaces.

I also know there are women that have lived their whole life biologically female for whom being a "woman" is a fundamental part of their identity, and part of being a woman are the shared experiences of harassment and sexualisation, and then nobody can truly be a woman without those experiences. Thus to them someone who is biologically male self-identifying as female is as offensive as a white person claiming to be black.

I do not think such issues should stop self-identification but I do think they should be treated with respect and sensitivity. Nobody sincerely voicing such issues should be called a ‘transphobe’ or a ‘terf’, or accused of ‘dog-whistle transphobia’.

During the discussion in this thread plasmid said Starmer has bent the knee to “neo-nazi transphobes” and Jock said “The government blocking progressive legislation in Scotland to provide ammo for their stupid culture war to try and win idiot votes” – calling anyone who agrees with the UK government blocking the GRR an idiot.

This is not just an on-line phenomena either. During a debate in the House of Commons on the GRR the Tory MP Miriam Cates voiced concerns about sex offenders exploiting the GRR and she was followed by the Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle who said
Goodness me, that speech was probably one of the worst transphobic, dog-whistle speeches that I have heard in an awful long time. The idea of linking trans people with predators, frankly, is disgusting and you should be ashamed.

Such rhetoric won’t win over anyone. In fact, it will probably push people away from the cause.

Well if the anti-trans hate movement are so sensitive they would genuinely be offended by harsh language such as 'idiot' then maybe they should grow up a little.
Its not like people are trying to legislate them out of existence.

And this is exactly what I was talking about. Not everyone who voices a concern about self-identification or the GRR are part of an "anti-trans hate movement" and want to legislate trans people out of existence.

Sometimes you hear an argument too often from people who go on to prove it incorrect.
I heard this from the so called feminist groups who took money from anti-abortion activists in America to fight and lobby against ANY expansion of trans rights in the UK, regardless of their exact nature. They were apparently just concerned about the effect on women.
I heard it from Graham Linehan who was just a concerned liberal apparently before going on some very extreme hate filled rants about trans people.
In fact, every single time someone is caught showing the extremity of their hatred for trans people, they pull out this same line of reasoning 'I'm not extreme, I'm just so concerned about trans people having rights.'

But there are so many quiet people who do wonder about some issues and will hear someone voicing a seemingly valid concern only to be insulted and those quiet people are going to feel insulted too. Normal, kind, people get scared to voice an opinion on these issues and then they listen to the only people who seem to care about those issues - those who are trying to exploit the issue or who are actually horrible people.

I believe this happened with the Brexit referendum too. I am extremely pro-EU and think we should rejoin, but I know many pro-leave people irl and it was clear to me that they felt the pro-EU side wasn't listening or caring. They became defensive and reinforced their anti-EU feelings when they thought that pro-leave people were being insulted and personally attacked by pro-EU people, with the whole 'Brexiters are stupid and/or racist' attitude.

I see the same thing happening with transgender rights now. I believe it is understandable to be scared of convicted sex offenders being allowed into women's only spaces. Instead of name-calling, we should explain the safeguards that exist to stop that from happening.

Moreover, I worry that when we over-use words like 'transphobe' we risk making it a less impactful word. I think this has happened with 'racist'. That word has been thrown around so much over the last few years that being called a 'racist' for many people is not as bad as it used to be because they think that some people are "over-sensitive" and will call almost anyone a 'racist'.


I see that there's basically no way to convince a bigot that they are being a bigot and need to change their behavior without hurting their feelings/self-esteem (they think they are "normal and kind people"). Trying is a fool's errand.

It's impracticable to recognize the harm of one's own bigotry, identify you need to change, and not feel bad about all the time you spent on the wrong side (or in ostensible neutrality) doing so much harm.

There's lots of ways to work through that feeling, but it's pretty unavoidable unless you have a personality disorder imo.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Artisreal
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany9235 Posts
January 26 2023 22:08 GMT
#12220
I have to preface this with the caveat that this is my general impression from media coverage (US, UK, Germany) which is generally left leaning.

I find it very hard to believe the concerns put forth due to the fact that those who put them forth are no proponents of equality. Especially men who want to "protect" women's safe spaces. Those same people shout the loudest if a violent man perpetrates crimes against women. But what do they shout? "Don't mingle the good men with these wife-beaters, rapists, not all men are like that!"
But suddenly the trans people are the bigger threat. While most violence against women happens in the home or close to home.

My opinion on that: get a fucking grip and address the problem at hand instead of fighting a culture war.
passive quaranstream fan
Prev 1 609 610 611 612 613 645 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
17:00
#42
TKL 271
SteadfastSC243
IndyStarCraft 132
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 271
SteadfastSC 243
BRAT_OK 160
IndyStarCraft 132
JuggernautJason87
UpATreeSC 5
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 45055
Britney 28637
Bisu 958
Shuttle 680
Mini 217
Dewaltoss 145
Nal_rA 84
Rock 28
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Sacsri 7
[ Show more ]
soO 7
HiyA 7
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3157
pashabiceps2545
Heroes of the Storm
MindelVK12
Other Games
gofns27203
tarik_tv7167
Grubby2863
Gorgc2652
Beastyqt752
B2W.Neo743
ceh9504
ArmadaUGS136
Hui .78
Trikslyr72
C9.Mang071
KnowMe67
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV198
WardiTV190
Counter-Strike
PGL101
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 51
• StrangeGG 46
• Reevou 1
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix7
• Michael_bg 6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6713
• TFBlade1197
• Shiphtur420
Other Games
• imaqtpie496
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 58m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Ultimate Battle
3 days
Light vs ZerO
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS5
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.