EPTBestiality in Sweden soon to be illegal - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
FreeZer
Sweden288 Posts
| ||
|
DwD
Sweden8621 Posts
| ||
|
aNGryaRchon
United States438 Posts
On June 14 2013 17:16 Reason wrote: Yeah this is the really funny thing and nttea mentioned it earlier. We can enslave and/or consume them but make love to them? You sick bastard! Make love? LOL you're ridiculous! | ||
|
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
I think it's disgusting but as long as the animals don't get hurt i don't see why we should bother the police/courts with that stuff, they got more important things to do. | ||
|
Xahhk
Canada540 Posts
My dog on girl porn says otherwise. | ||
|
Sjokola
Netherlands800 Posts
I'm not sure what I think about this subject. I think it probably should be illegal for various reasons. But it's a strange world where you can kill an animal just for food even without anesthesia (if your religion demands it) but you can't "make love" to that same animal. Which would in any case hurt it a lot less. | ||
|
Reason
United Kingdom2770 Posts
On June 14 2013 17:21 endy wrote: That's always a tricky question. One could argue that pedophilia is also just a "preference". Basically almost anything that has no genetic or viral cause could be potentially categorized as a "preference". Yeah it is just a preference really. Technically: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia Specifically: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia There's a lot of grey areas around this sort of thing and when compared to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebephilia and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia you will see less attention is paid to actually classifying these things properly and more just to how they tie in with our laws and morals. Hebephilia, ephebophilia and pedophilia are just different types of chronophilia yet only pedophilia is actually recognised or viewed as a mental disorder, or is on the list of mental disorders, essentially because it contradicts our laws and morals to a greater extent than the others and people are anxious to label and classify things in an effort to understand them. Really whether it's an illness, a fetish, a preference or whatever else seems more to be down to individual opinion and current psychological understanding or classifications rather than a cold, hard, factual answer. lol it might sound funny but I watched a documentary on this sort of thing and I've seen videos on the internet that confirm some people do genuinely make love to animals, whether you can imagine yourself doing so or not is irrelevant, it happens. On June 14 2013 17:23 namste wrote: A guy stuffing his dick into a chicken is hardly love making. Agreed, but that's not what I was referring to. | ||
|
Calliopee
Denmark151 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States42186 Posts
| ||
|
dimomarg
Greece11 Posts
| ||
|
QuackPocketDuck
410 Posts
| ||
|
TOCHMY
Sweden1692 Posts
On June 14 2013 17:40 dimomarg wrote: So has anyone got a link to that dog-fucker site? I want a laugh just no | ||
|
Reason
United Kingdom2770 Posts
On June 14 2013 17:38 KwarK wrote: I strongly disagree with this change, if no animal is being harmed then who gives a fuck, people outrank animals anyway and the law has no place in the bedroom. o.O this doesn't sound like your typical overly-sarcastic post that says the complete opposite of what you believe in an effort to emphasise how stupid that line of thinking is. Bolded section is only thing that makes me still think this is a joke but tone is hard to detect on the internet.... Reading the following post I can only assume this is how you really feel about the issue ???  | ||
|
Greenei
Germany1754 Posts
| ||
|
Maxie
Sweden2653 Posts
That it was made legal at the same time as homosexuality due to being in the same paragraph is almost amusing, though. Just how lazy were we? | ||
|
Calliopee
Denmark151 Posts
| ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5277 Posts
also, zoo keepers/water park amusement center(or whatever they're called)keepers/scientists/veterinarians and maybe a few others, jerk off animals to release them of stress/to take samples/and so on. obviously there is a thin grey line here. how would one prove one but not the other?. | ||
|
aNGryaRchon
United States438 Posts
On June 14 2013 17:36 Reason wrote: lol it might sound funny but I watched a documentary on this sort of thing and I've seen videos on the internet that confirm some people do genuinely make love to animals, whether you can imagine yourself doing so or not is irrelevant, it happens. I didn't think it was possible, but you just manage to be more ridiculous than your earlier post? Make love? Shall we go now and interview "couples" engaged in bestiality and ask how much they love each other to really feel the need to... make LOVE!!! lol how stupid is that! | ||
|
KwarK
United States42186 Posts
On June 14 2013 17:43 Reason wrote: o.O this doesn't sound like your typical overly-sarcastic post that says the complete opposite of what you believe in an effort to emphasise how stupid that line of thinking is. Bolded section is only thing that makes me still think this is a joke but tone is hard to detect on the internet.... Reading the following post I can only assume this is how you really feel about the issue ??? Murder of people is wrong, slaughter of animals is fine, the reason for this is that our system or morality puts value on sentience and we have it and they don't. We outrank them. No people are being harmed and this is in the bedroom between consenting adults and what we view legally as little more than biological machines for creating meat and other animal products, I'd much rather the law accepted that it simply had no place in the bedroom that going after things that the vast majority can hate on. Take gay sex. It's not fine because it's two consenting adults, it's fine because no-one is getting harmed because they're two consenting adults. The fact that consenting adults are involved doesn't necessarily make something fine, rather it is the lack of harm that makes it fine and the consent is relevant because it indicates a lack of harm. A man fucking a dog is fine for the exact same reason as gay sex, because no-one is getting harmed. The law has no place in the bedroom outside of protecting people and the previous laws already covered that. This is just picking a sexual niche and outlawing it for no reason, the previous law even covered the animal cruelty aspect, this law only criminalises no cruel beastiality. | ||
|
PerryHooter
Sweden268 Posts
On June 14 2013 15:57 Orangered wrote: I don't know about Sweden, but in my part of Europe, and I am sure elsewhere, bestiality is normally just instinctively taboo, hence it does not even have to be legislated. Any swedes here care to provide further details? I don't know about your country, but in sweden rape and murder is instinctively taboo, and yet it's illegal here. Weird shit. | ||
| ||
