|
it's clearly not that hard to distinguish to between whats necessary and what is totally not necessary Clearly it is hard to distinguish.... that's why we have an endless debate about it in society. I don't know how you can say this when I just now made you double your own list of the things that are necessary.
|
Clearly it is hard to distinguish.... that's why we have an endless debate about it in society. I don't know how you can say this when I just now made you double your own list of the things that are necessary.
Just because you made me list examples, doesn't mean i doubled anything, please tell me what i added what was not in the list before. To put it simply again. Everything that makes a society , in it's core, work , i consider necessary. That is in our modern society, food and education and health, plain and simple. And everything down in the chain that is required to get these three things. Making me list every single kind of bread or transport vehicle does not make it harder to distinguish.
And i don't know what society u are specifically talking about, but atleast here in germany, we are not really debating about wether we should throw our public healthcare system away, or if schools shouldn't be public or not. Basically everyone here is glad that these things exist.
edit: and about singapore,
With a population of 5 million people and an average GDP of 61k Dollar per capita, i think its atleast doubtful if the sytem can work as an example for a much bigger country. I assume there are not that many people. The relatively small number of citizens kind of prevents many of the problems we discussed in the thread, that may only appear in bigger countries with lower income and worse infrastructure. You can't really choose between many hospitals if only one or two are near enough in case of an emergency and if you don't have much money for travelling left to spend, which makes , for that reason, competition nearly non-existant for many larger and poorer countries.
|
On February 24 2013 10:19 BrTarolg wrote: I'm surprised that singapore isn't mentioned anywhere in this thread
It's private healthcare over there - the way it works is that every person is forced to put x amount of money (of various subsidised levels) aside, and people can choose how to use this money to spend on their healthcare (expensive or cheap)
It's capitalism at it's best. Theres HUGE competition for specialists and healthcare over there. If i don't like the price of one guy i can literally move 10 minutes down the road to find a cheaper guy
Costs seem very reasonable. One time i had an emergency with my breathing as i could barely move and breathing was hurting, so i admitted into a hospital (driven by my parents). The whole cost for that day ended up being about 200-300 dollars to be seen to by a doctor, given some time in the hospital and given a diagnosis + some treatment
Saw a sinus specialist there once, he advised me specifically on prices of stuff before we did it and suggested the most cheap route for what he thought was appropriate. Did an endoscopy, some tests, prescribed all the right treatment and medicine, all amounted to about 300-400 dollars
The healthcare there is fantastic. You can see a doctor on the day (from hundreds to choose from) for about 50 dollars cheap to 100 dollars (or more depending on who you choose)
----
I suspect prices are cheap because it's capitalism. Everyone has money saved away to spend on healthcare, and naturally people will choose what they can afford. Many spend that money on insurance, others choose not to and there is tons of competition between doctors and specialists (and hospitals) to get stuff checked out
I really like this train of thought. Some potential issues I can think of however include emergency care, and ambulance costs where its neccessary for to seek help from the closeest possible provider. Also, what if costs exceed the money you were required to set aside? Does the government step in?
A lot of Americans would be averse to being required to set aside money, but in my opinion its better than having the money pass in and out of the government. In my mind there are 2 distinct solutions, either more capitalism (more competition, however im not sure how to introduce this) or complete government oversight, and price regulations. Of course this is the main dividing line for the country, so nothing will ever get done,
|
On February 24 2013 10:35 Dagan159 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 10:19 BrTarolg wrote: I'm surprised that singapore isn't mentioned anywhere in this thread
It's private healthcare over there - the way it works is that every person is forced to put x amount of money (of various subsidised levels) aside, and people can choose how to use this money to spend on their healthcare (expensive or cheap)
It's capitalism at it's best. Theres HUGE competition for specialists and healthcare over there. If i don't like the price of one guy i can literally move 10 minutes down the road to find a cheaper guy
Costs seem very reasonable. One time i had an emergency with my breathing as i could barely move and breathing was hurting, so i admitted into a hospital (driven by my parents). The whole cost for that day ended up being about 200-300 dollars to be seen to by a doctor, given some time in the hospital and given a diagnosis + some treatment
Saw a sinus specialist there once, he advised me specifically on prices of stuff before we did it and suggested the most cheap route for what he thought was appropriate. Did an endoscopy, some tests, prescribed all the right treatment and medicine, all amounted to about 300-400 dollars
The healthcare there is fantastic. You can see a doctor on the day (from hundreds to choose from) for about 50 dollars cheap to 100 dollars (or more depending on who you choose)
----
I suspect prices are cheap because it's capitalism. Everyone has money saved away to spend on healthcare, and naturally people will choose what they can afford. Many spend that money on insurance, others choose not to and there is tons of competition between doctors and specialists (and hospitals) to get stuff checked out I really like this train of thought. Some potential issues I can think of however include emergency care, and ambulance costs where its neccessary for to seek help from the closeest possible provider. Also, what if costs exceed the money you were required to set aside? Does the government step in? A lot of Americans would be averse to being required to set aside money, but in my opinion its better than having the money pass in and out of the government. In my mind there are 2 distinct solutions, either more capitalism (more competition, however im not sure how to introduce this) or complete government oversight, and price regulations. Of course this is the main dividing line for the country, so nothing will ever get done,
AFAIK, ambulances are free for emergencies. They classify what is and isn't an emergency. Otherwise its a 180$ fee if it isn't an emergency
Also they will just take you to the nearest hospital in the case of an emergency (a real, life threatening one)
In my case, i was healthy enough to be driven by parents to a hospital of my choice (though not healthy enough to make it there on my own thats for sure haha)
edit:
let me clarify. An emergency ambulance will take you to a government hospital. You can of course, call a private hospital for a private ambulance if you so wish.
|
Can you just stop talking to Ruse?
That is a guy with 4 posts prior to this thread, and a pretty trolly name completely derailing a thread with anarcho-capitalist nonsense, changing definitions of words, the whole stuff we have seen in just about any political thread here. Do you really not notice that he is just trolling you? He will never accept what you say, and when driven into a corner he will just ignore what you said, act smug, and tell you that you are sheep. And it is apparently pretty effective trolling because even if they do it for them 100ths time on another new alt, people will still bite it because it is just so delicious to try to make someone acting in that way understand just how much bullshit they are sprouting. But they are just trolling you. So ignore them, report, and continue with the discussion this thread is actually about instead of the 100th debate of why taxation is not theft, why we are not slaves owned by human farmers, etc.... Just ignore it.
User was warned for this post
|
What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands.
|
On February 24 2013 10:48 Simberto wrote: Can you just stop talking to Ruse?
That is a guy with 4 posts prior to this thread, and a pretty trolly name completely derailing a thread with anarcho-capitalist nonsense, changing definitions of words, the whole stuff we have seen in just about any political thread here. Do you really not notice that he is just trolling you? He will never accept what you say, and when driven into a corner he will just ignore what you said, act smug, and tell you that you are sheep. And it is apparently pretty effective trolling because even if they do it for them 100ths time on another new alt, people will still bite it because it is just so delicious to try to make someone acting in that way understand just how much bullshit they are sprouting. But they are just trolling you. So ignore them, report, and continue with the discussion this thread is actually about instead of the 100th debate of why taxation is not theft, why we are not slaves owned by human farmers, etc.... Just ignore it. I am not an anarcho-capitalist, and I am not a troll, and I have every right to discuss ideas in this thread as anyone else.
You aren't a moderator, so don't backseat moderate by telling people to ignore/report me.
|
On February 24 2013 10:43 BrTarolg wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 10:35 Dagan159 wrote:On February 24 2013 10:19 BrTarolg wrote: I'm surprised that singapore isn't mentioned anywhere in this thread
It's private healthcare over there - the way it works is that every person is forced to put x amount of money (of various subsidised levels) aside, and people can choose how to use this money to spend on their healthcare (expensive or cheap)
It's capitalism at it's best. Theres HUGE competition for specialists and healthcare over there. If i don't like the price of one guy i can literally move 10 minutes down the road to find a cheaper guy
Costs seem very reasonable. One time i had an emergency with my breathing as i could barely move and breathing was hurting, so i admitted into a hospital (driven by my parents). The whole cost for that day ended up being about 200-300 dollars to be seen to by a doctor, given some time in the hospital and given a diagnosis + some treatment
Saw a sinus specialist there once, he advised me specifically on prices of stuff before we did it and suggested the most cheap route for what he thought was appropriate. Did an endoscopy, some tests, prescribed all the right treatment and medicine, all amounted to about 300-400 dollars
The healthcare there is fantastic. You can see a doctor on the day (from hundreds to choose from) for about 50 dollars cheap to 100 dollars (or more depending on who you choose)
----
I suspect prices are cheap because it's capitalism. Everyone has money saved away to spend on healthcare, and naturally people will choose what they can afford. Many spend that money on insurance, others choose not to and there is tons of competition between doctors and specialists (and hospitals) to get stuff checked out I really like this train of thought. Some potential issues I can think of however include emergency care, and ambulance costs where its neccessary for to seek help from the closeest possible provider. Also, what if costs exceed the money you were required to set aside? Does the government step in? A lot of Americans would be averse to being required to set aside money, but in my opinion its better than having the money pass in and out of the government. In my mind there are 2 distinct solutions, either more capitalism (more competition, however im not sure how to introduce this) or complete government oversight, and price regulations. Of course this is the main dividing line for the country, so nothing will ever get done, AFAIK, ambulances are free for emergencies. They classify what is and isn't an emergency. Otherwise its a 180$ fee if it isn't an emergency Also they will just take you to the nearest hospital in the case of an emergency (a real, life threatening one) In my case, i was healthy enough to be driven by parents to a hospital of my choice (though not healthy enough to make it there on my own thats for sure haha) edit: let me clarify. An emergency ambulance will take you to a government hospital. You can of course, call a private hospital for a private ambulance if you so wish.
Interesting, so they have government hospitals that compete with the private sector? You can bet Americans would NEVER go for government run hospitals at the moment =P
This is proabably one of the very few instances in which the government could compete with the private market and win, it shoudnt be hard to beat 2000% markups.
Am I correct in understanding that they make you set aside money for healthcare, and most people use that money to buy insurance? How is this enforced?
|
On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands.
Stop wasting oxygen please.
|
On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands.
What the...
|
On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands.
Sure the pharm companies might conceive a pill like that. But they have very good reasons not to. First PR, if you lose credibility as a pharm company that will cost you millions of dollars. Secondly doctors arent going to prescribe it. If you think that doctors perscribe medicine to purposefully keep a person in a sickly state then your off your rocker. Most doctors truely care about their patients, and have made enourmous sacrifices to understand exactly what drugs do to the body. Dont demonize everyone in the industry because of the failings of a few.
|
CA10824 Posts
On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands. this is so dumb i don't even know where to begin. i'm guessing you have zero medical education? do you even know how many steps there are in getting a new drug on the market and how expensive that process is?
|
On February 24 2013 11:05 Dagan159 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands. Sure the pharm companies might conceive a pill like that. But they have very good reasons not to. First PR, if you lose credibility as a pharm company that will cost you millions of dollars. Secondly doctors arent going to prescribe it. If you think that doctors perscribe medicine to purposefully keep a person in a sickly state then your off your rocker. Most doctors truely care about their patients, and have made enourmous sacrifices to understand exactly what drugs do to the body. Dont demonize everyone in the industry because of the failings of a few.
Yes there's a huge battle between good and bad people here and yes, most of the drugs are made to aid not to harm but do you really think that at the end of the day the good doctors win over the billions of dollars profit that could be made off a drug not properly tested and not developed to it's best ? Talk about the corruption in the healthcare system but no corruption in the drug production system ? I was mostly responding to the first post using my common sense so there's no need for anyone else to quote me wether they think i'm talking trash or not.Really.
|
On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands. I was not aware that willpower had the ability to beat any disease. You sound like that politician that said women have the ability to not become pregnant from rape (something to that effect).
|
On February 24 2013 11:13 terranu1 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 11:05 Dagan159 wrote:On February 24 2013 10:53 terranu1 wrote: What is flawed is the way the citizens are cornered into thinking they are zombies who can't do nothing for themselves whenever they feel ill, but rush to the nearest hospital to get robbed by the big pharmaceutical companies. The dependency on hospitals and doctors and mostly,drugs, that's the real issue. I've read more terrifiant articles wich pointed out how alot of drugs are made to prolongue a disease while easening the pain and others to play a role in future development of new random diseases to be treated and man I'm sure it's all real. Why ? mostly because whenever a citizen feels ill, his highest concern is to put or find out the name of whatever he "has". Strange but that's why the modern medicine never fails to deliver because doctors ,CT's and what not can put a name on whatever it is, be it wrong or right and that somehow is more than enough for the patient. Once he finds out ,he's ready to take whatever drug is needed against that particular named disease.This wouldn't be a problem if the guys who are in charge with the development of drugs were actually well intended good people but they are far from that. There used to be times when you became ill because there was a reason to it and if the disease was deadly you would simply die unless you had a will strong enough to overcome it and learn from that what is to be learned. Nowadays is nothing like that, nowadays the hospitals are nothing different than fast food stands. Sure the pharm companies might conceive a pill like that. But they have very good reasons not to. First PR, if you lose credibility as a pharm company that will cost you millions of dollars. Secondly doctors arent going to prescribe it. If you think that doctors perscribe medicine to purposefully keep a person in a sickly state then your off your rocker. Most doctors truely care about their patients, and have made enourmous sacrifices to understand exactly what drugs do to the body. Dont demonize everyone in the industry because of the failings of a few. Yes there's a huge battle between good and bad people here and yes, most of the drugs are made to aid not to harm but do you really think that at the end of the day the good doctors win over the billions of dollars profit that could be made off a drug not properly tested and not developed to it's best ? Talk about the corruption in the healthcare system but no corruption in the drug production system ? I was mostly responding to the first post using my common sense so there's no need for anyone else to quote me wether they think i'm talking trash or not.Really.
You are not using common sense. You are using idiocy. You are essentially alluding that the pharmaceutical companies have bought the FDA and every single doctor out there. Even the most ridiculous conspiracy-nut I have ever met would probably agree that it is impossible to buy off millions of people.
|
Not every doctor out there because not every doctor out there has the power to confront those companies.
Besides that, my point is that a disease can be cured without the aid off doctors and with really cheap and effective ways ,the so called and widely hated "alternative" medicine wich I have rarely seen in hospitals .I did spent over 2 years as a patient for different severe problems wether you believe it or not and many doctors told me that unless I have the will to fight the disease, drugs won't help much. Most of the good doctors tell you that if they care about you. Do you want to be cured ? They ask me. If yes, then start acting like it, don't count on the pills to do the job everytime.
|
On February 24 2013 11:27 terranu1 wrote: Not every doctor out there because not every doctor out there has the power to confront those companies.
Besides that, my point is that a disease can be cured without the aid off doctors and with really cheap and effective ways ,the so called and widely hated "alternative" medicine wich I have rarely seen in hospitals .I did spent over 2 years as a patient for different severe problems wether you believe it or not and many doctors told me that unless I have the will to fight the disease, drugs won't help much. Most of the good doctors tell you that if they care about you. Do you want to be cured ? They ask me. If yes, then start acting like it, don't count on the pills to do the job everytime.
You really do have zero clue about the medical community and how it works? Whilst there are still things pharmaceutical companies could and should do better it is not a question of power for someone to change it. If you have a good cause it is incredibly easy to get the rest of the medical community behind you - none of us became doctors because we wanted to hurt our patients. Furthermore, do you really believe that any doctor would continue to prescribe medicine if he saw only detrimental effects and no positive outcomes? You are right now accusing a lot of people of being straight up murderers!
EDIT: And no, I do not hate alternative medicine - I just do not believe in it. Most of it shows zero effect when tested in a double-blind placebocontrolled study or in head-to-head tests. Some of it even shows detrimental effects.
|
CA10824 Posts
On February 24 2013 11:27 terranu1 wrote: Not every doctor out there because not every doctor out there has the power to confront those companies.
Besides that, my point is that a disease can be cured without the aid off doctors and with really cheap and effective ways ,the so called and widely hated "alternative" medicine wich I have rarely seen in hospitals .I did spent over 2 years as a patient for different severe problems wether you believe it or not and many doctors told me that unless I have the will to fight the disease, drugs won't help much. Most of the good doctors tell you that if they care about you. Do you want to be cured ? They ask me. If yes, then start acting like it, don't count on the pills to do the job everytime. ah yes, "alternative medicine". believe me, i see it's potential as well in certain cases. but the problem with the vast majority of alternative medicine is that it is NOT evidence-based medicine. meaning, there is no quality research about it. sure you might have your occasional case series, but nothing substantial like an RCT to prove that the benefits are actually due to the medicine. so you're saying that you want physicians to revert back to their practices pre-20th century and practice medicine based on anecdotal stories of things working rather than based on actual statistical outcomes... nice.
|
On February 24 2013 11:27 terranu1 wrote: Not every doctor out there because not every doctor out there has the power to confront those companies.
Besides that, my point is that a disease can be cured without the aid off doctors and with really cheap and effective ways ,the so called and widely hated "alternative" medicine wich I have rarely seen in hospitals .I did spent over 2 years as a patient for different severe problems wether you believe it or not and many doctors told me that unless I have the will to fight the disease, drugs won't help much. Most of the good doctors tell you that if they care about you. Do you want to be cured ? They ask me. If yes, then start acting like it, don't count on the pills to do the job everytime.
I understand that there may be a basis for alternative medicine which has spanned over centuries in its use. The truth is that alternative medicine is largely unregulated and unproven. There is little if any well recognized critically evaluated evidence base for its use and efficacy.
Doctors, however, prescribe drugs on evidence based medicine. Large independent research groups derive guidelines and protocols based on proven drug efficacy. We don't give you Simvastatin because we get kickbacks from it. We give it because we know it lowers your risk of cardiovascular disease.
FYI, its not a difference of opinion. You are just misinformed.
|
Geat well ,I'll go on with my 0 faith in proven medicine with no worries. I had hearth surgery at the age of 3 and I forgot the number of times doctors told me to stay away from any kind of physical effort or prescribed me ridiculously expensive medicine just to prevent strokes. I never took most of those drugs because they were expensive and I never had any strokes despite my years of playing soccer and do all those things they strongly advised me not to, because I'd be dead soon. You guys just go on and ignore my posts alltogheter now ,I might be a rare happy scenario and that's all.
|
|
|
|