• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:58
CEST 08:58
KST 15:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202542Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up5LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced55
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins EWC 2025 Clem Interview: "PvT is a bit insane right now" TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Would you prefer the game to be balanced around top-tier pro level or average pro level? Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers? [G] Progamer Settings Help, I can't log into staredit.net
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine 9/11 Anniversary Possible Al Qaeda Attack on 9/11
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 605 users

NASA: Strange and sudden massive melt in Greenland - Page 6

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 25 Next All
FuGGu
Profile Joined March 2012
United States176 Posts
July 25 2012 16:14 GMT
#101
Oh man....this is really not good. Someone has to cool this damn planet down!
Geoube
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada67 Posts
July 25 2012 16:15 GMT
#102
Has anyone read this new article in Rolling Stone?
Little long winded but takes a new look at the economic side of this whole debate. (at least read the first 3 pages)
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719
Crownlol
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States3726 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 16:19:45
July 25 2012 16:18 GMT
#103
This isn't a controversial topic, and it isn't a debate. It's a fact, and denialists exist. Incentives for denial exist financially and career-wise. Imagine if you'd spent 40 years building a political empire as a conservative, only to have "well, honestly your policies are ruining the climate for humans" thrown in your face. You'd be required to deny it just to keep your job and your wealth.

The fact is, it probably matters zero to denialists that they're damaging the climate of children's futures. The effect of immediacy will cause them to first consider how they're going to pay their mortgage and put their kids through school- and then how to get stupid rich- before they consider damaging the environment. If rich conservative politicians embraced the reforms required to solve the issue, they'd be spitting in the face of the huge businesses that back them financially, and committing career suicide.

This isn't a scientific issue, it's a political issue.

Keep in mind, plenty of people deny that the holocaust ever happened too.
shaGuar :: elemeNt :: XeqtR :: naikon :: method
SkelA
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Macedonia13032 Posts
July 25 2012 16:39 GMT
#104
Greenland in our not so distant past didnt even have ice through the whole year. It was a land with grass in the south part and thats why its called Greenland.

I seriously doubt we had anything with the global warming in the past and possibly in the present. Ok we might contribute a little with our human behavior but thats so little to actually matter on a grand scale.

Stork and KHAN fan till 2012 ...
Thorakh
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands1788 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 16:43:01
July 25 2012 16:41 GMT
#105
On July 25 2012 23:34 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2012 22:30 emythrel wrote:
On July 25 2012 22:23 Pandemona wrote:
On July 25 2012 22:22 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On July 25 2012 22:18 Pandemona wrote:
Oh my 0.O
Sounds like it happend 150 years ago though so it could be a rare event, could be interesting to see if this is the signs that i once read about or watched a documentary about where it goes really warm, and that triggers another ice age. The last ice age was after alot of heat wasn't it? Due to the polar caps moving all the time and then all of a sudden a big change happens which triggers the ice age? Was a documentary i watched a while back so i don't remember all the facts


150 years ago and it's rare? People look at time in such a subjective manner, hell even us being on this planet is a blip of time, so if an event happened 150 years ago and now happened again that is not rare whatsoever...


150 years ago it supposidly happend, planet has been labelled as 2012 years old, that means its happend 13.4 times, thus its "rare" imo


Well thats just 2012 years since Jesus was born..... the earth is actually 12,000 years old according to reliable biblical sources (adding up the ages of everyone in the Abrahamic line all the way back to Adam) which still means that every 150 years is pretty rare ;p

On a serious note, even if this event is a regular and knowable phenomenon, its impact on the Earth isn't known. With higher temperatures from climate change, the ice might not refreeze (as it obviously did last time), we just don't know.


Sorry did you say the earth is 12,000 years old or were you just quoting ridiculous scripture to make your point... If we go by your logic, people can come from thin air, and the earth is the center of the universe. "facepalms"


Show nested quote +
On July 25 2012 23:29 Thorakh wrote:
On July 25 2012 23:14 oGoZenob wrote:
On July 25 2012 11:31 TheToaster wrote:
Global warming is probably one of the most confusing and unknown scientific studies at the moment. No one actually has a clue why climates can shift so greatly on such a large scale. It's the only reason why there's so much controversy involving global warming. There are theories and slight evidences to support both sides, but neither side really knows what the fuck is going on in the first place.

actually there is not really a controversy. The huge majority of the scientists agrees on global warming. But the uneducated clueless random people who never did anything even remotely close to climatology in their life disagrees. I hardly call that a controversy.
I just don't get why people feels the urge to give their opinions on scientific facts. Science is not about opinion, noone cares what you think if you don't scientifically works on the subject
I find it mind boggling how people can deny global warming. "Oh the science is just wrong, I know better" Yeah seriously?

"It's because of the sun!" -- No, it isn't, that has been proven not to be the case.
"People are making money of it!" -- Ah, okay, obviously that means it's not true.
"We just had a cold winter!" -- Learn how climatology works.
"*links random anti global warming website* It's not true, I have this website as a source!" -- www. creationism. com
"There was a petition signed by many scientists saying it's not true!" -- Yeah, and none of them were climatologists.

And I could go on and on. What explanation is there for the disbelieve?


I am not disagreeing with you on all points but "its because of the sun" is actually a very valid argument, I would equate it. The sun is in a cycle, every 11 years (2012 being the 11th year) it emits (to keep it realy simple we'll call it heat) heat out into space, but about approximately every 10th 11 year cycle it builds up much hotter than usual, in retrospect, which than can actually short out telecommunications/satellites etc... It is also the cause of big heat waves which can result in this "global warming" feeling. That's why specifically the last 10 years were the "hottest ever" because it was additive of the 11 year cycle of heat emission with the inclusion of our pollution.

But are people causing it? Yes, not entirely though, I would give it 70/30 (people the 70) as an approximation.
No. As I said, it's been proven that the 11 year cycle is not a (major) factor in global warming.

I seriously doubt we had anything with the global warming in the past and possibly in the present. Ok we might contribute a little with our human behavior but thats so little to actually matter on a grand scale.
And you know this because...? Are you a climatologist? No? Then why do you believe you know better than the thousands of experts in this field?
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
July 25 2012 17:16 GMT
#106
http://www.tgdaily.com/sustainability-features/64925-greenland-ice-melt-unprecedented-says-nasa

Ice cores from [Summit Station in central Greenland] show that melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time," says Lora Koenig, a Goddard glaciologist and a member of the research team analyzing the satellite data.

"But if we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome."


So... it's perfectly normal, but it's also unprecedented and rabble rabble rabble global warming.

God this fake crisis gets boring.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
Infernal_dream
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2359 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 17:35:32
July 25 2012 17:35 GMT
#107
Does global warming exist? Yeah. Has it always, yeah. That's the point. The world would have never come out of the ice age if not for normal global warming. People just like to blow shit up so that it sounds better. And to all of those "you're fucking the world up for your children." What are you doing exactly? Typing on your computer doing the same stuff I am. So I'm not going to pretend that I give a damn while my actions show the complete opposite.
dvorakftw
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
681 Posts
July 25 2012 17:37 GMT
#108
On July 26 2012 02:16 DeepElemBlues wrote:
http://www.tgdaily.com/sustainability-features/64925-greenland-ice-melt-unprecedented-says-nasa

Show nested quote +
Ice cores from [Summit Station in central Greenland] show that melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time," says Lora Koenig, a Goddard glaciologist and a member of the research team analyzing the satellite data.

"But if we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome."


So... it's perfectly normal, but it's also unprecedented and rabble rabble rabble global warming.

God this fake crisis gets boring.

Denier! Denier! Persecute the unbeliever!!!
gForce.
Profile Joined January 2010
United Kingdom345 Posts
July 25 2012 17:39 GMT
#109
Damn, I can't swim.
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
July 25 2012 17:39 GMT
#110
On July 26 2012 02:35 Infernal_dream wrote:
Does global warming exist? Yeah. Has it always, yeah. That's the point. The world would have never come out of the ice age if not for normal global warming. People just like to blow shit up so that it sounds better. And to all of those "you're fucking the world up for your children." What are you doing exactly? Typing on your computer doing the same stuff I am. So I'm not going to pretend that I give a damn while my actions show the complete opposite.

The fact that we know that global warming has natural causes has no impact on whether or not our interaction with the system accelerates or intensifies global warming in perhaps a destructive way (on top of the destructive nature of pollution in general).
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
dvorakftw
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
681 Posts
July 25 2012 17:44 GMT
#111
On July 26 2012 01:18 Crownlol wrote:
This isn't a controversial topic, and it isn't a debate. It's a fact, and denialists exist. Incentives for denial exist financially and career-wise. Imagine if you'd spent 40 years building a political empire as a conservative, only to have "well, honestly your policies are ruining the climate for humans" thrown in your face. You'd be required to deny it just to keep your job and your wealth.


lolololol, and the scientists who are selling us all this alarming news have absolutely ZERO incentives.

Btw, those policies ruining the climate? That's things like having a nice home with electricity and being able to travel in a car. If only we could be more like Native Americans living in harmony with the environment!

And here's a treat for everyone who has never bothered to look at a chart of Earth temperatures that goes back more than one or two hundred years, let alone the one or two decades that are used in most scare propaganda.

[image loading]
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 17:53:18
July 25 2012 17:50 GMT
#112
This person appears to think that scientists view co2 as the only factor in human-made global warming. Brilliant!

Surely you know what happens after global warming peaks and stuff starts melting right . The co2 doesn't dip just because everything is cooling down.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Tantaburs
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada1825 Posts
July 25 2012 18:06 GMT
#113
People need to realise that Data can and is manipulated by both sides to prove their point. Yes Big Buisness wants you to believe that global warming is a hoax and you can fell fine about driving your Truck. they are biased toward denial of Global Warming. But there is bias on the other side too. You need to understand who paid for the story you read as it will usually tell you your bias. I;m not going to get into a big Climate Change debate as i don;t know that much on the subject but if you look at the history of earth you can see that climate change happened before we were here and it will happen after we are gone. As was said earlier in this thread there is a reason that Greenland is called Greenland. There is a reason that you can find fossils of jungle plants all over the world. Ice ages happened before man walked this earth.

"One cannot play StarCraft with clenched fish.." ~Nick "Confucius" Plott
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 18:22:49
July 25 2012 18:22 GMT
#114
On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:lolololol, and the scientists who are selling us all this alarming news have absolutely ZERO incentives.

as soon as i read this sentence i knew you weren't arguing because you are concerned with the facts, it's some sort of personal mission to show the internet how smart and edgy you are. in the same sentence you are making an argument about motives and issues outside of the actual debate, and you are trying to go for a witty critique instead of making it about the facts

On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:Btw, those policies ruining the climate? That's things like having a nice home with electricity and being able to travel in a car. If only we could be more like Native Americans living in harmony with the environment!

Nobody is suggesting that we need to emulate Native Americans. Once again you are not talking about the actual issue and using manipulative debating tactics to try and prove your point. And as far as the electricity and modern living statement goes, it seems like you are saying that no matter what the effects of our way of life we don't need to change them because, hey, they're great! I can assure you that there are many people from countries outside ones such as the US that don't see "being able to travel in a car" as a privilege.

On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:And here's a treat for everyone who has never bothered to look at a chart of Earth temperatures that goes back more than one or two hundred years, let alone the one or two decades that are used in most scare propaganda.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Once again you've taken on this witty and condescending tone that adds nothing to your argument. As far as the chart goes, it's hard for me to write a response to it as you have completely failed to make any point about the data, you just put the chart in after a not so subtle comment suggesting that you have researched the topic way more than anyone else. There are many different points I see that you could be trying to make, so instead of me trying to cover all the bases could you add in your actual argument?
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 18:25:32
July 25 2012 18:23 GMT
#115
Wether global warming is caused by mankind or not,
At least its a good concept to rally people together for a cause and push technological progress.

Think greenland just has its occasional heatwave wich happens everywhere now and then, and that this is just a meteorological event , not related to climate.
Its more extreme then normal it seems but not an indication the world will end in the next few months.
REDBLUEGREEN
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Germany1903 Posts
July 25 2012 18:39 GMT
#116
On July 26 2012 01:39 SkelA wrote:
Greenland in our not so distant past didnt even have ice through the whole year. It was a land with grass in the south part and thats why its called Greenland.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red
When Erik returned to Iceland after his exile had expired, he is said to have brought with him stories of "Greenland". Erik deliberately gave the land a more appealing name than "Iceland" in order to lure potential settlers. He explained, "people would be attracted to go there if it had a favorable name".[...]After spending the winter in Iceland, Erik returned to Greenland in 985 with a large number of colonists and established two colonies on its southwest coast: the Eastern Settlement or Eystribyggð, in modern-day Qaqortoq, and the Western Settlement or Vestribyggð, close to present-day Nuuk. (Eventually, a Middle Settlement grew, but many people suggest it formed part of the Western Settlement.) The Eastern and Western Settlements, both established on the southwest coast, proved the only two areas suitable for farming.

There was only a small southern coastal strip that was free of ice and the scientist aren't even speaking about those, it's the massive inner core which is the topic.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 18:45:29
July 25 2012 18:40 GMT
#117
ice doesnt melt on the inside, it melts on the surface.
Doesnt this just only mean that its above 0 degrees in 97% of greenland?
nkr
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Sweden5451 Posts
July 25 2012 19:17 GMT
#118
Lets say we can never convince the doubters that we are 100% the cause of global warming. I used my incredible paint skills to illustrate why "taking action" against global warming should be the obvious choice, regardless of if we can proove that humans are the sole cause.

[image loading]
ESPORTS ILLUMINATI
Thorakh
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands1788 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 19:24:18
July 25 2012 19:19 GMT
#119
On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2012 01:18 Crownlol wrote:
This isn't a controversial topic, and it isn't a debate. It's a fact, and denialists exist. Incentives for denial exist financially and career-wise. Imagine if you'd spent 40 years building a political empire as a conservative, only to have "well, honestly your policies are ruining the climate for humans" thrown in your face. You'd be required to deny it just to keep your job and your wealth.


lolololol, and the scientists who are selling us all this alarming news have absolutely ZERO incentives.

Btw, those policies ruining the climate? That's things like having a nice home with electricity and being able to travel in a car. If only we could be more like Native Americans living in harmony with the environment!

And here's a treat for everyone who has never bothered to look at a chart of Earth temperatures that goes back more than one or two hundred years, let alone the one or two decades that are used in most scare propaganda.

[image loading]
What are you even trying to say with that chart? That it was hotter in some periods in the past? Yes, obviously. But what relevance does that have to global warming right now? One million years ago there weren't any civilizations that could get destroyed by global warming (or cooling). The entire point of the debate is that the global warming that is happening now will have significant, possibly civilization threatening effects on the entire world.

The data shows that CO2 and average temps are increasing over the past decades and that's what counts.
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 19:25:12
July 25 2012 19:24 GMT
#120
On July 26 2012 04:17 nkr wrote:
Lets say we can never convince the doubters that we are 100% the cause of global warming. I used my incredible paint skills to illustrate why "taking action" against global warming should be the obvious choice, regardless of if we can proove that humans are the sole cause.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]



an argument such as that suggests that each potential outcome has the same probability of occurring which skews the risk/reward decision. my first thought when i saw the picture was of pascal's wager, and it falls apart for the same reason. my position is the same as yours, but i think that argument isn't going to get you very far
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 25 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
Elite Rising Star #16 - Day 1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
-ZergGirl 141
ProTech36
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 1980
Pusan 394
Leta 284
Light 124
PianO 114
Backho 78
Noble 72
GoRush 51
HiyA 32
Bale 10
[ Show more ]
NaDa 7
Dota 2
ODPixel32
League of Legends
JimRising 664
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K757
Other Games
summit1g8984
Tasteless230
NeuroSwarm58
Pyrionflax56
SortOf3
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1217
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 39
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH353
• davetesta31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1838
• Stunt463
• HappyZerGling198
Other Games
• Scarra1023
Upcoming Events
OSC
3h 2m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4h 2m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
8h 2m
PiGosaur Monday
17h 2m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 4h
Stormgate Nexus
1d 7h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 9h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
RotterdaM Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.