• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 00:40
CET 06:40
KST 14:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
Zerg is losing its identity in StarCraft 2 Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What happened to TvZ on Retro? SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2090 users

NASA: Strange and sudden massive melt in Greenland - Page 6

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 25 Next All
FuGGu
Profile Joined March 2012
United States176 Posts
July 25 2012 16:14 GMT
#101
Oh man....this is really not good. Someone has to cool this damn planet down!
Geoube
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada67 Posts
July 25 2012 16:15 GMT
#102
Has anyone read this new article in Rolling Stone?
Little long winded but takes a new look at the economic side of this whole debate. (at least read the first 3 pages)
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719
Crownlol
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States3726 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 16:19:45
July 25 2012 16:18 GMT
#103
This isn't a controversial topic, and it isn't a debate. It's a fact, and denialists exist. Incentives for denial exist financially and career-wise. Imagine if you'd spent 40 years building a political empire as a conservative, only to have "well, honestly your policies are ruining the climate for humans" thrown in your face. You'd be required to deny it just to keep your job and your wealth.

The fact is, it probably matters zero to denialists that they're damaging the climate of children's futures. The effect of immediacy will cause them to first consider how they're going to pay their mortgage and put their kids through school- and then how to get stupid rich- before they consider damaging the environment. If rich conservative politicians embraced the reforms required to solve the issue, they'd be spitting in the face of the huge businesses that back them financially, and committing career suicide.

This isn't a scientific issue, it's a political issue.

Keep in mind, plenty of people deny that the holocaust ever happened too.
shaGuar :: elemeNt :: XeqtR :: naikon :: method
SkelA
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Macedonia13069 Posts
July 25 2012 16:39 GMT
#104
Greenland in our not so distant past didnt even have ice through the whole year. It was a land with grass in the south part and thats why its called Greenland.

I seriously doubt we had anything with the global warming in the past and possibly in the present. Ok we might contribute a little with our human behavior but thats so little to actually matter on a grand scale.

Stork and KHAN fan till 2012 ...
Thorakh
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands1788 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 16:43:01
July 25 2012 16:41 GMT
#105
On July 25 2012 23:34 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2012 22:30 emythrel wrote:
On July 25 2012 22:23 Pandemona wrote:
On July 25 2012 22:22 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On July 25 2012 22:18 Pandemona wrote:
Oh my 0.O
Sounds like it happend 150 years ago though so it could be a rare event, could be interesting to see if this is the signs that i once read about or watched a documentary about where it goes really warm, and that triggers another ice age. The last ice age was after alot of heat wasn't it? Due to the polar caps moving all the time and then all of a sudden a big change happens which triggers the ice age? Was a documentary i watched a while back so i don't remember all the facts


150 years ago and it's rare? People look at time in such a subjective manner, hell even us being on this planet is a blip of time, so if an event happened 150 years ago and now happened again that is not rare whatsoever...


150 years ago it supposidly happend, planet has been labelled as 2012 years old, that means its happend 13.4 times, thus its "rare" imo


Well thats just 2012 years since Jesus was born..... the earth is actually 12,000 years old according to reliable biblical sources (adding up the ages of everyone in the Abrahamic line all the way back to Adam) which still means that every 150 years is pretty rare ;p

On a serious note, even if this event is a regular and knowable phenomenon, its impact on the Earth isn't known. With higher temperatures from climate change, the ice might not refreeze (as it obviously did last time), we just don't know.


Sorry did you say the earth is 12,000 years old or were you just quoting ridiculous scripture to make your point... If we go by your logic, people can come from thin air, and the earth is the center of the universe. "facepalms"


Show nested quote +
On July 25 2012 23:29 Thorakh wrote:
On July 25 2012 23:14 oGoZenob wrote:
On July 25 2012 11:31 TheToaster wrote:
Global warming is probably one of the most confusing and unknown scientific studies at the moment. No one actually has a clue why climates can shift so greatly on such a large scale. It's the only reason why there's so much controversy involving global warming. There are theories and slight evidences to support both sides, but neither side really knows what the fuck is going on in the first place.

actually there is not really a controversy. The huge majority of the scientists agrees on global warming. But the uneducated clueless random people who never did anything even remotely close to climatology in their life disagrees. I hardly call that a controversy.
I just don't get why people feels the urge to give their opinions on scientific facts. Science is not about opinion, noone cares what you think if you don't scientifically works on the subject
I find it mind boggling how people can deny global warming. "Oh the science is just wrong, I know better" Yeah seriously?

"It's because of the sun!" -- No, it isn't, that has been proven not to be the case.
"People are making money of it!" -- Ah, okay, obviously that means it's not true.
"We just had a cold winter!" -- Learn how climatology works.
"*links random anti global warming website* It's not true, I have this website as a source!" -- www. creationism. com
"There was a petition signed by many scientists saying it's not true!" -- Yeah, and none of them were climatologists.

And I could go on and on. What explanation is there for the disbelieve?


I am not disagreeing with you on all points but "its because of the sun" is actually a very valid argument, I would equate it. The sun is in a cycle, every 11 years (2012 being the 11th year) it emits (to keep it realy simple we'll call it heat) heat out into space, but about approximately every 10th 11 year cycle it builds up much hotter than usual, in retrospect, which than can actually short out telecommunications/satellites etc... It is also the cause of big heat waves which can result in this "global warming" feeling. That's why specifically the last 10 years were the "hottest ever" because it was additive of the 11 year cycle of heat emission with the inclusion of our pollution.

But are people causing it? Yes, not entirely though, I would give it 70/30 (people the 70) as an approximation.
No. As I said, it's been proven that the 11 year cycle is not a (major) factor in global warming.

I seriously doubt we had anything with the global warming in the past and possibly in the present. Ok we might contribute a little with our human behavior but thats so little to actually matter on a grand scale.
And you know this because...? Are you a climatologist? No? Then why do you believe you know better than the thousands of experts in this field?
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
July 25 2012 17:16 GMT
#106
http://www.tgdaily.com/sustainability-features/64925-greenland-ice-melt-unprecedented-says-nasa

Ice cores from [Summit Station in central Greenland] show that melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time," says Lora Koenig, a Goddard glaciologist and a member of the research team analyzing the satellite data.

"But if we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome."


So... it's perfectly normal, but it's also unprecedented and rabble rabble rabble global warming.

God this fake crisis gets boring.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
Infernal_dream
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2359 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 17:35:32
July 25 2012 17:35 GMT
#107
Does global warming exist? Yeah. Has it always, yeah. That's the point. The world would have never come out of the ice age if not for normal global warming. People just like to blow shit up so that it sounds better. And to all of those "you're fucking the world up for your children." What are you doing exactly? Typing on your computer doing the same stuff I am. So I'm not going to pretend that I give a damn while my actions show the complete opposite.
dvorakftw
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
681 Posts
July 25 2012 17:37 GMT
#108
On July 26 2012 02:16 DeepElemBlues wrote:
http://www.tgdaily.com/sustainability-features/64925-greenland-ice-melt-unprecedented-says-nasa

Show nested quote +
Ice cores from [Summit Station in central Greenland] show that melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time," says Lora Koenig, a Goddard glaciologist and a member of the research team analyzing the satellite data.

"But if we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome."


So... it's perfectly normal, but it's also unprecedented and rabble rabble rabble global warming.

God this fake crisis gets boring.

Denier! Denier! Persecute the unbeliever!!!
gForce.
Profile Joined January 2010
United Kingdom345 Posts
July 25 2012 17:39 GMT
#109
Damn, I can't swim.
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
July 25 2012 17:39 GMT
#110
On July 26 2012 02:35 Infernal_dream wrote:
Does global warming exist? Yeah. Has it always, yeah. That's the point. The world would have never come out of the ice age if not for normal global warming. People just like to blow shit up so that it sounds better. And to all of those "you're fucking the world up for your children." What are you doing exactly? Typing on your computer doing the same stuff I am. So I'm not going to pretend that I give a damn while my actions show the complete opposite.

The fact that we know that global warming has natural causes has no impact on whether or not our interaction with the system accelerates or intensifies global warming in perhaps a destructive way (on top of the destructive nature of pollution in general).
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
dvorakftw
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
681 Posts
July 25 2012 17:44 GMT
#111
On July 26 2012 01:18 Crownlol wrote:
This isn't a controversial topic, and it isn't a debate. It's a fact, and denialists exist. Incentives for denial exist financially and career-wise. Imagine if you'd spent 40 years building a political empire as a conservative, only to have "well, honestly your policies are ruining the climate for humans" thrown in your face. You'd be required to deny it just to keep your job and your wealth.


lolololol, and the scientists who are selling us all this alarming news have absolutely ZERO incentives.

Btw, those policies ruining the climate? That's things like having a nice home with electricity and being able to travel in a car. If only we could be more like Native Americans living in harmony with the environment!

And here's a treat for everyone who has never bothered to look at a chart of Earth temperatures that goes back more than one or two hundred years, let alone the one or two decades that are used in most scare propaganda.

[image loading]
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 17:53:18
July 25 2012 17:50 GMT
#112
This person appears to think that scientists view co2 as the only factor in human-made global warming. Brilliant!

Surely you know what happens after global warming peaks and stuff starts melting right . The co2 doesn't dip just because everything is cooling down.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Tantaburs
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada1825 Posts
July 25 2012 18:06 GMT
#113
People need to realise that Data can and is manipulated by both sides to prove their point. Yes Big Buisness wants you to believe that global warming is a hoax and you can fell fine about driving your Truck. they are biased toward denial of Global Warming. But there is bias on the other side too. You need to understand who paid for the story you read as it will usually tell you your bias. I;m not going to get into a big Climate Change debate as i don;t know that much on the subject but if you look at the history of earth you can see that climate change happened before we were here and it will happen after we are gone. As was said earlier in this thread there is a reason that Greenland is called Greenland. There is a reason that you can find fossils of jungle plants all over the world. Ice ages happened before man walked this earth.

"One cannot play StarCraft with clenched fish.." ~Nick "Confucius" Plott
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 18:22:49
July 25 2012 18:22 GMT
#114
On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:lolololol, and the scientists who are selling us all this alarming news have absolutely ZERO incentives.

as soon as i read this sentence i knew you weren't arguing because you are concerned with the facts, it's some sort of personal mission to show the internet how smart and edgy you are. in the same sentence you are making an argument about motives and issues outside of the actual debate, and you are trying to go for a witty critique instead of making it about the facts

On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:Btw, those policies ruining the climate? That's things like having a nice home with electricity and being able to travel in a car. If only we could be more like Native Americans living in harmony with the environment!

Nobody is suggesting that we need to emulate Native Americans. Once again you are not talking about the actual issue and using manipulative debating tactics to try and prove your point. And as far as the electricity and modern living statement goes, it seems like you are saying that no matter what the effects of our way of life we don't need to change them because, hey, they're great! I can assure you that there are many people from countries outside ones such as the US that don't see "being able to travel in a car" as a privilege.

On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:And here's a treat for everyone who has never bothered to look at a chart of Earth temperatures that goes back more than one or two hundred years, let alone the one or two decades that are used in most scare propaganda.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Once again you've taken on this witty and condescending tone that adds nothing to your argument. As far as the chart goes, it's hard for me to write a response to it as you have completely failed to make any point about the data, you just put the chart in after a not so subtle comment suggesting that you have researched the topic way more than anyone else. There are many different points I see that you could be trying to make, so instead of me trying to cover all the bases could you add in your actual argument?
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 18:25:32
July 25 2012 18:23 GMT
#115
Wether global warming is caused by mankind or not,
At least its a good concept to rally people together for a cause and push technological progress.

Think greenland just has its occasional heatwave wich happens everywhere now and then, and that this is just a meteorological event , not related to climate.
Its more extreme then normal it seems but not an indication the world will end in the next few months.
REDBLUEGREEN
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Germany1904 Posts
July 25 2012 18:39 GMT
#116
On July 26 2012 01:39 SkelA wrote:
Greenland in our not so distant past didnt even have ice through the whole year. It was a land with grass in the south part and thats why its called Greenland.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red
When Erik returned to Iceland after his exile had expired, he is said to have brought with him stories of "Greenland". Erik deliberately gave the land a more appealing name than "Iceland" in order to lure potential settlers. He explained, "people would be attracted to go there if it had a favorable name".[...]After spending the winter in Iceland, Erik returned to Greenland in 985 with a large number of colonists and established two colonies on its southwest coast: the Eastern Settlement or Eystribyggð, in modern-day Qaqortoq, and the Western Settlement or Vestribyggð, close to present-day Nuuk. (Eventually, a Middle Settlement grew, but many people suggest it formed part of the Western Settlement.) The Eastern and Western Settlements, both established on the southwest coast, proved the only two areas suitable for farming.

There was only a small southern coastal strip that was free of ice and the scientist aren't even speaking about those, it's the massive inner core which is the topic.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 18:45:29
July 25 2012 18:40 GMT
#117
ice doesnt melt on the inside, it melts on the surface.
Doesnt this just only mean that its above 0 degrees in 97% of greenland?
nkr
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Sweden5451 Posts
July 25 2012 19:17 GMT
#118
Lets say we can never convince the doubters that we are 100% the cause of global warming. I used my incredible paint skills to illustrate why "taking action" against global warming should be the obvious choice, regardless of if we can proove that humans are the sole cause.

[image loading]
ESPORTS ILLUMINATI
Thorakh
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands1788 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 19:24:18
July 25 2012 19:19 GMT
#119
On July 26 2012 02:44 dvorakftw wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2012 01:18 Crownlol wrote:
This isn't a controversial topic, and it isn't a debate. It's a fact, and denialists exist. Incentives for denial exist financially and career-wise. Imagine if you'd spent 40 years building a political empire as a conservative, only to have "well, honestly your policies are ruining the climate for humans" thrown in your face. You'd be required to deny it just to keep your job and your wealth.


lolololol, and the scientists who are selling us all this alarming news have absolutely ZERO incentives.

Btw, those policies ruining the climate? That's things like having a nice home with electricity and being able to travel in a car. If only we could be more like Native Americans living in harmony with the environment!

And here's a treat for everyone who has never bothered to look at a chart of Earth temperatures that goes back more than one or two hundred years, let alone the one or two decades that are used in most scare propaganda.

[image loading]
What are you even trying to say with that chart? That it was hotter in some periods in the past? Yes, obviously. But what relevance does that have to global warming right now? One million years ago there weren't any civilizations that could get destroyed by global warming (or cooling). The entire point of the debate is that the global warming that is happening now will have significant, possibly civilization threatening effects on the entire world.

The data shows that CO2 and average temps are increasing over the past decades and that's what counts.
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-25 19:25:12
July 25 2012 19:24 GMT
#120
On July 26 2012 04:17 nkr wrote:
Lets say we can never convince the doubters that we are 100% the cause of global warming. I used my incredible paint skills to illustrate why "taking action" against global warming should be the obvious choice, regardless of if we can proove that humans are the sole cause.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]



an argument such as that suggests that each potential outcome has the same probability of occurring which skews the risk/reward decision. my first thought when i saw the picture was of pascal's wager, and it falls apart for the same reason. my position is the same as yours, but i think that argument isn't going to get you very far
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 25 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
20:30
Best Games of SC
Serral vs Clem
Solar vs Cure
Serral vs Clem
Reynor vs GuMiho
herO vs Cure
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
19:00
Masters Cup #150: Group B
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 218
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 323
yabsab 195
Bale 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever551
NeuroSwarm90
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 643
Counter-Strike
fl0m1
Other Games
summit1g13971
WinterStarcraft400
ViBE174
Fuzer 163
Mew2King88
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick542
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 26
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt413
• HappyZerGling96
Other Games
• Scarra882
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4h 20m
RSL Revival
4h 20m
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
6h 20m
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs TBD
WardiTV Korean Royale
6h 20m
BSL 21
14h 20m
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
14h 20m
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
17h 20m
Wardi Open
1d 6h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 11h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: GosuLeague
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
BSL: GosuLeague
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.