On July 08 2012 19:31 Alexstrasas wrote: While i was a guy that used to back up gay kids getting bullied in high school, i can honestly say I’m seriously tired of this bullshit.
Considering that there are European countries with 1.20 fertility rates i wonder why there aren’t any companies supporting traditional families with kids, i guess normal families just aren’t "hip" anymore
Geuss what, you big dummy, traditional families aren't actually being discriminated against.
On July 08 2012 19:31 Alexstrasas wrote: While i was a guy that used to back up gay kids getting bullied in high school, i can honestly say I’m seriously tired of this bullshit.
Considering that there are European countries with 1.20 fertility rates i wonder why there aren’t any companies supporting traditional families with kids, i guess normal families just aren’t "hip" anymore
Normal families have the advantage of being "normal" or simply being a family.
I'm also confident that there are many companies out there that cater to needy families.
On July 08 2012 19:18 Otolia wrote: Allowing private companies to meddle with public affairs is never a good idea, no matter how justified it seems to be. Google isn't the lamb it tries to appear as and this is just another setup in their attempt to solidify a monopoly over the young generation who is usually in favor of gay marriage.
I don't see how this is a bad thing. So many companies use ethical practices to bring in consumers. Without companies doing this stuff companies wouldn't bother about the environment or slave labor. Private companies are another form of democracy for their consumers, remember SOPA and GoDaddy stuff. Consumers will only use products of companies with the same interests as them, the only problem with involving companies with public affairs is when money is involved (conflicting interests), which it isn't here. In my opinion this is more of a risk than a strategic business decision for Google, good on them.
On July 08 2012 19:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote: What is delaying from happening I think nude gay parades where they paint there bodies and such gives a bad outlook on gays the general public
Wow, really? This sounds ridiculous and isn't really helping their course.
On July 08 2012 19:18 Otolia wrote: Allowing private companies to meddle with public affairs is never a good idea, no matter how justified it seems to be. Google isn't the lamb it tries to appear as and this is just another setup in their attempt to solidify a monopoly over the young generation who is usually in favor of gay marriage.
I don't see how this is a bad thing. So many companies use ethical practices to bring in consumers. Without companies doing this stuff companies wouldn't bother about the environment or slave labor. Private companies are another form of democracy for their consumers, remember SOPA and GoDaddy stuff. Consumers will only use products of companies with the same interests as them, the only problem with involving companies with public affairs is when money is involved, which it isn't here. In my opinion this is more of a risk than a strategic business decision for Google, good on them.
Yes, quite true! Private companies they may be, but they still require the public to function!
On July 08 2012 19:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote: What is delaying from happening I think nude gay parades where they paint there bodies and such gives a bad outlook on gays the general public
This definitely does hurt the cause, so to speak. If you want a minority group to be assimilated into the majority group, you have to seem like you fit in with the norm. You can't violate literally every single social norm followed by the majority group and expect them to want you to fit in. It's the gay guy wearing a suit and tie that needs to be the spokesman. Not the nearly nude man dancing down the street with butterfly wings and a wand.
On July 08 2012 19:31 Alexstrasas wrote: While i was a guy that used to back up gay kids getting bullied in high school, i can honestly say I’m seriously tired of this bullshit.
Considering that there are European countries with 1.20 fertility rates i wonder why there aren’t any companies supporting traditional families with kids, i guess normal families just aren’t "hip" anymore
How do traditional families need help? They are in a favourable position.
I'm honestly curious about a statement like this.
The fact that you call them "normal" says it all, really.
On July 08 2012 18:36 TirramirooO wrote: Sick of talking about gay people.. Im not Christian, i dont believe in religion but that is totally the ANTICHRIST... With the same sex you cant make children soo is against nature but make people understant that is becoming hard.
Keep going, in the future you all gonna open your EYES.
antichrist is a christian only term so why are you bringing it up if you're not christian
years from now, people will look back and laugh at the fundamentalist nutjobs idiots who opposed gay marriage, just like those who opposed interacial marriage based on the bible back in the day
the only argument against gay marraige is religious, and as we all know, the christian bible supports slavery, genocide, misogyny, infanticide, and other things, so let's not derive morals from the bible.....
On July 08 2012 18:42 Adreme wrote: This seems like a good idea by Google to get some good press and exposure and since they will be in places where its a divisive issue there are sure to be counter protesters which gurentees press coverage.
People that think like this should just off themselves.
It's great that google are doing this but if they have more influence than people then it's a very sorry state of affairs the world is in.
OMG. The whole definition of marriage is male and female not male male or female female or dog dog or rabid hamster ninjitsu monkey badger raper. Gay marriage is a contradiction of what marriage is ment to be. I got nothing against gay its just they always seem to be the jealous sibling always wanting to get in on what ther other one has but that their no ment to have. Marriage should stick to its meaning of male and female!!!
On July 08 2012 19:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote: What is delaying from happening I think nude gay parades where they paint there bodies and such gives a bad outlook on gays the general public
This definitely does hurt the cause, so to speak. If you want a minority group to be assimilated into the majority group, you have to seem like you fit in with the norm. You can't violate literally every single social norm followed by the majority group and expect them to want you to fit in. It's the gay guy wearing a suit and tie that needs to be the spokesman. Not the nearly nude man dancing down the street with butterfly wings and a wand.
Heh. Do they really do this? I know about gay parades and how extravagant some have been, but I think this is ludicrous ( although they certainly have the right to express themselves in such a manner, it really doesn't help their cause ). Then again, if they claim this is how they always behave ( the extravagant ones ), I really don't know what to say. What you see is what you get?
Maybe they'll (the extravagant) just be like Westboro, but different.
On July 08 2012 18:42 Adreme wrote: This seems like a good idea by Google to get some good press and exposure and since they will be in places where its a divisive issue there are sure to be counter protesters which gurentees press coverage.
People that think like this should just off themselves.
It's great that google are doing this but if they have more influence than people then it's a very sorry state of affairs the world is in.
One way to look at this is the more Hindu approach to it than the Buddhist-like approach. What does not really matter is the intent, but the impact instead.
On July 08 2012 19:42 shark. wrote: OMG. The whole definition of marriage is male and female not male male or female female or dog dog or rabid hamster ninjitsu monkey badger raper. Gay marriage is a contradiction of what marriage is ment to be. I got nothing against gay its just they always seem to be the jealous sibling always wanting to get in on what ther other one has but that their no ment to have. Marriage should stick to its meaning of male and female!!!
Definitions can change. A relevant example is the word 'gay'. Just be open to change.
On July 08 2012 19:42 shark. wrote: OMG. The whole definition of marriage is male and female not male male or female female or dog dog or rabid hamster ninjitsu monkey badger raper. Gay marriage is a contradiction of what marriage is ment to be. I got nothing against gay its just they always seem to be the jealous sibling always wanting to get in on what ther other one has but that their no ment to have. Marriage should stick to its meaning of male and female!!!
I totally agree with this. Equality is a terrible, terrible concept.
Damn those jealous gay people for wanting to have the same right as other human beings!
On July 08 2012 19:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote: What is delaying from happening I think nude gay parades where they paint there bodies and such gives a bad outlook on gays the general public
This definitely does hurt the cause, so to speak. If you want a minority group to be assimilated into the majority group, you have to seem like you fit in with the norm. You can't violate literally every single social norm followed by the majority group and expect them to want you to fit in. It's the gay guy wearing a suit and tie that needs to be the spokesman. Not the nearly nude man dancing down the street with butterfly wings and a wand.
Heh. Do they really do this? I know about gay parades and how extravagant some have been, but I think this is ludicrous ( although they certainly have the right to express themselves in such a manner, it really doesn't help their cause ). Then again, if they claim this is how they always behave ( the extravagant ones ), I really don't know what to say. What you see is what you get?
Maybe they'll just be like Westboro, but different.
In the Netherlands, gays celebrate their new rights and freedoms, with an extravagant anual parade. That is what it is, a celebration. It is also a big fuck you to the few homophobes that still exist here. It is harmless and quite fun for them I imagine.
I don't think the man with the wand and butterfly wings is trying to be a spokesman.
On July 08 2012 18:42 Adreme wrote: This seems like a good idea by Google to get some good press and exposure and since they will be in places where its a divisive issue there are sure to be counter protesters which gurentees press coverage.
People that think like this should just off themselves.
It's great that google are doing this but if they have more influence than people then it's a very sorry state of affairs the world is in.
Thats not a very nice thing to tell me but aside from that Im not sure why you are mad at me because there will be counter protests since Google made a big deal about this campaign.
On July 08 2012 19:33 1a2a3a[MB] wrote: What is delaying from happening I think nude gay parades where they paint there bodies and such gives a bad outlook on gays the general public
This definitely does hurt the cause, so to speak. If you want a minority group to be assimilated into the majority group, you have to seem like you fit in with the norm. You can't violate literally every single social norm followed by the majority group and expect them to want you to fit in. It's the gay guy wearing a suit and tie that needs to be the spokesman. Not the nearly nude man dancing down the street with butterfly wings and a wand.
Heh. Do they really do this? I know about gay parades and how extravagant some have been, but I think this is ludicrous ( although they certainly have the right to express themselves in such a manner, it really doesn't help their cause ). Then again, if they claim this is how they always behave ( the extravagant ones ), I really don't know what to say. What you see is what you get?
Maybe they'll just be like Westboro, but different.
In the Netherlands, gays celebrate their new rights and freedoms, with an extravagant anual parade. That is what it is, a celebration. It is also a big fuck you to the few homophobes that still exist here. It is harmless and quite fun for them I imagine.
I don't think the man with the wand and butterfly wand is trying to be a spokesman.
I think he was making a metaphor anyway
Yeah and I think how they celebrate may be odd, but people should be welcoming of their behaviour since they are not, technically, harming anybody. Of course public nudity is a big no no!
However, such behaviour might be detrimental to their cause though. But as I said, it's a display of "What you see is what you get."
On July 08 2012 19:42 shark. wrote: OMG. The whole definition of marriage is male and female not male male or female female or dog dog or rabid hamster ninjitsu monkey badger raper. Gay marriage is a contradiction of what marriage is ment to be. I got nothing against gay its just they always seem to be the jealous sibling always wanting to get in on what ther other one has but that their no ment to have. Marriage should stick to its meaning of male and female!!!
Meant by whom? As defined by whom? This idea that you have an objective truth which is self evident to you but which you cannot share the logical source of is quite frustrating. It's a concept created by the human mind and you only speak for one human mind. Marriage for you doesn't necessarily have to mean the same thing as it does for somebody else and if you fundamentally disagree with the idea of a gay marriage that much then I suggest that you don't marry a man. Interfering with the marriage of two other people who may have a completely different definition of marriage to yours is a massive encroachment on their personal liberty. You don't own marriage.
EPT
