• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:35
CEST 17:35
KST 00:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202559RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 931 users

Shooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 490

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 488 489 490 491 492 503 Next
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP.

If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post.
Leporello
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2845 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-16 16:53:53
July 16 2013 16:52 GMT
#9781
On July 17 2013 01:49 SKC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?

I'm pretty damn sure he wouldn't, if the remaining evidence remained the same. That's not how it works, you can't just say something and it is true unless there is 100% proof that it is a lie.



0.0


Wow.



I'm paralyzed by that, I mean I need a break now. Hello complete and total double-standard. I'm done here.
Big water
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
July 16 2013 16:53 GMT
#9782
On July 17 2013 01:51 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:45 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun (and an actually clear motive), and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

I don't know how solid the "he reached for his gun" defense is.

The best thing for Trayvon to do, once the fight started, is to do what you are supposed to do - meet force with force. Knock Zimmerman on his ass, sure, but then don't go in to finish him off.


But would he get convicted of murder? I mean, wouldn't he have that sliver of plausible doubt?

Would he not have been better off killing Zimmerman?

Thanks for a polite reply.

The evidence wouldn't point in his favor. Not to mention you don't have to kill someone to stop them from shooting you.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
SKC
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil18828 Posts
July 16 2013 16:53 GMT
#9783
On July 17 2013 01:52 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:49 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?

I'm pretty damn sure he wouldn't, if the remaining evidence remained the same. That's not how it works, you can't just say something and it is true unless there is 100% proof that it is a lie.



0.0


Wow.

What? Do you know the diference between reasonable doubt and absolute proof?
Felnarion
Profile Joined December 2011
442 Posts
July 16 2013 16:54 GMT
#9784
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Yeah, a question, you definitely posed it as a question, and not a claim. You asked a rhetorical question and then immediately went into justifying why you felt that way.

And your stupid assumption is that the entire scene is the same, but Trayvon would be able to beat Zimmerman to death, literally to death with his fists, and get away with it because Zimmerman had a gun.

It's one thing to fire once at someone who is on top of you and, by chance angle, hit their heart, killing them.

It's entirely another thing to literally punch and slam someone past unconsciousness, into death.

If you can't see the difference, the conversation isn't worth having. Nevermind that it's totally irrelevant because there is nothing that says the situation happened this way.

If you wanna discuss the Magical Unicorn Shooting you've made up in your mind, there's other threads for that, go make one, stop mucking this one up with this baseless crap.
Leporello
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2845 Posts
July 16 2013 16:54 GMT
#9785
On July 17 2013 01:53 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:51 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:45 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun (and an actually clear motive), and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

I don't know how solid the "he reached for his gun" defense is.

The best thing for Trayvon to do, once the fight started, is to do what you are supposed to do - meet force with force. Knock Zimmerman on his ass, sure, but then don't go in to finish him off.


But would he get convicted of murder? I mean, wouldn't he have that sliver of plausible doubt?

Would he not have been better off killing Zimmerman?

Thanks for a polite reply.

The evidence wouldn't point in his favor. Not to mention you don't have to kill someone to stop them from shooting you.


Accidental killing blow.
Big water
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
July 16 2013 16:59 GMT
#9786
On July 17 2013 01:54 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:53 LegalLord wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:51 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:45 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun (and an actually clear motive), and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

I don't know how solid the "he reached for his gun" defense is.

The best thing for Trayvon to do, once the fight started, is to do what you are supposed to do - meet force with force. Knock Zimmerman on his ass, sure, but then don't go in to finish him off.


But would he get convicted of murder? I mean, wouldn't he have that sliver of plausible doubt?

Would he not have been better off killing Zimmerman?

Thanks for a polite reply.

The evidence wouldn't point in his favor. Not to mention you don't have to kill someone to stop them from shooting you.


Accidental killing blow.

Excessive force.

If Trayvon were alive, he could very well have served time for assault.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
SKC
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil18828 Posts
July 16 2013 17:03 GMT
#9787
On July 17 2013 01:51 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:45 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun (and an actually clear motive), and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

I don't know how solid the "he reached for his gun" defense is.

The best thing for Trayvon to do, once the fight started, is to do what you are supposed to do - meet force with force. Knock Zimmerman on his ass, sure, but then don't go in to finish him off.


But would he get convicted of murder? I mean, wouldn't he have that sliver of plausible doubt?

Would he not have been better off killing Zimmerman?

Thanks for a polite reply.

Maybe not murder, could be manslaughter. You could make an argument that he would have been better off killing Zimmermann anyway, since being convicted is better than being dead. He would be better off if he didn't attack Zimmermann and had gone straight home.
shuttledance
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada18 Posts
July 16 2013 17:04 GMT
#9788
"People have been obsessed with the George Zimmerman murder trial. People are tracking it like it was a black teenager in a gated community."
shall we dance?
Felnarion
Profile Joined December 2011
442 Posts
July 16 2013 17:08 GMT
#9789
On July 17 2013 02:03 SKC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:51 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:45 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun (and an actually clear motive), and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

I don't know how solid the "he reached for his gun" defense is.

The best thing for Trayvon to do, once the fight started, is to do what you are supposed to do - meet force with force. Knock Zimmerman on his ass, sure, but then don't go in to finish him off.


But would he get convicted of murder? I mean, wouldn't he have that sliver of plausible doubt?

Would he not have been better off killing Zimmerman?

Thanks for a polite reply.

Maybe not murder, could be manslaughter. You could make an argument that he would have been better off killing Zimmermann anyway, since being convicted is better than being dead. He would be better off if he didn't attack Zimmermann and had gone straight home.


Or even if he hadn't gone straight home, or had done literally anything but attack someone.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-16 17:19:16
July 16 2013 17:11 GMT
#9790
On July 17 2013 01:54 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:53 LegalLord wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:51 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:45 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun (and an actually clear motive), and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

I don't know how solid the "he reached for his gun" defense is.

The best thing for Trayvon to do, once the fight started, is to do what you are supposed to do - meet force with force. Knock Zimmerman on his ass, sure, but then don't go in to finish him off.


But would he get convicted of murder? I mean, wouldn't he have that sliver of plausible doubt?

Would he not have been better off killing Zimmerman?

Thanks for a polite reply.

The evidence wouldn't point in his favor. Not to mention you don't have to kill someone to stop them from shooting you.


Accidental killing blow.

If you are talking about the exact case, he would likely still be guilty of manslaughter. He was on top of Zimmerman and we assume not aware he had a gun(because we assume if Martin was aware, he woudl have tried to get control of the gun). At that point being on top of GZ, Trayvon had no reasonable fear of death or harm and even an "Accidental killing blow." would be manslaughter. Due to the witness, John Good, he could not lie about self defense.

This assumes that Trayvon was not aware of the gun. If he was, that maybe different.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
July 16 2013 17:14 GMT
#9791
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.
Spawkuring
Profile Joined July 2008
United States755 Posts
July 16 2013 17:18 GMT
#9792
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?
Artax
Profile Joined July 2013
121 Posts
July 16 2013 17:22 GMT
#9793
This case really brings out the stupid in people. The leaps people go to to protect their convictions from facts.
"I would prefer to stay with the current policy that I'm pleased with rather than go through a change if I don't need to go through that change." --IRS Chief Danny Werfel, on why IRS employees should be exempt from Obamacare
Ferrose
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States11378 Posts
July 16 2013 17:22 GMT
#9794
On July 17 2013 02:18 Spawkuring wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?


http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/
@113candlemagic Office lady by day, lonely woman at night. | Official lolicon of thread 94273
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
July 16 2013 17:24 GMT
#9795
On July 17 2013 02:22 Ferrose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 02:18 Spawkuring wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?


http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

Thank you, I couldn't remember the mans name. Just remember clicking it in a facebook link.
Ferrose
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States11378 Posts
July 16 2013 17:29 GMT
#9796
On July 17 2013 02:24 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 02:22 Ferrose wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:18 Spawkuring wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?


http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

Thank you, I couldn't remember the mans name. Just remember clicking it in a facebook link.


I've been showing it to all the people on my Facebook saying that Zimmerman would be easily convicted if he were black and Trayvon were white : D
@113candlemagic Office lady by day, lonely woman at night. | Official lolicon of thread 94273
ComaDose
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Canada10357 Posts
July 16 2013 17:30 GMT
#9797
On July 17 2013 02:04 shuttledance wrote:
"People have been obsessed with the George Zimmerman murder trial. People are tracking it like it was a black teenager in a gated community."

where did you find this quote this is the funniest thing yet.
BW pros training sc2 is like kiss making a dub step album.
Fusa
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada148 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-16 17:35:21
July 16 2013 17:33 GMT
#9798
On July 17 2013 02:22 Ferrose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 02:18 Spawkuring wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?


http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/


what you all fail to realize is the moment zimmerman "stalked" treyvon, was the moment he was the aggressor. The argument is such that treyvon could have simply just "walked away", well he was actively walking away the whole time.

It a pretty f***** up world when I can run down someone, confront them, begin to defend/attack rather then avoiding confrontation, begin to lose the mutual combat, then shoot the person to death 300 meters away from where I started running after the kid.

^
and get acquitted saying that the victim was in fact the aggressor.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 16 2013 17:34 GMT
#9799
On July 17 2013 02:29 Ferrose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 02:24 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:22 Ferrose wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:18 Spawkuring wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?


http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

Thank you, I couldn't remember the mans name. Just remember clicking it in a facebook link.


I've been showing it to all the people on my Facebook saying that Zimmerman would be easily convicted if he were black and Trayvon were white : D

Yeah, that thing case is an awesome bookend to this one. The kid clearly wasn't trying to kill Roderick, but how would Roderick know that.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 16 2013 17:35 GMT
#9800
On July 17 2013 02:33 Fusa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2013 02:22 Ferrose wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:18 Spawkuring wrote:
On July 17 2013 02:14 Dosey wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:44 Leporello wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:40 SKC wrote:
On July 17 2013 01:36 Leporello wrote:
What if Trayvon had punched or head-slammed George Zimmerman harder than he did, and George Zimmerman died as a result?

Keep everything else the same, with all the facts, evidence, and testimony presented in this case. Would Trayvon not be the one walking free out of the courtroom, having been found Not Guilty on grounds of self-defense?

All he has to do is claim GZ threatened his life directly and reached for his gun, so Trayvon felt he had to tackle him and assault GZ until he was certain he wasn't going to get shot at. None of the evidence would refute his claim, GZ's gun and phone dispatch recording would both confirm Trayvon's story. You'd have to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt, that he was defending himself with what he had against a man with a gun, and he'd walk free.


It's a sad and unfortunate fact that, given our justice system, once the fight had started, Trayvon would've been better off not in just subduing George Zimmerman or beating him up, but in actually beating George Zimmerman to death, Trayvon would've ensured himself the best outcome, legally speaking.

It's an unavoidable circumstance of a wonderful premise -- that we don't punish anyone who could at all possibly be innocent. But it's just something to keep in mind.

Nope.

When there is an eye witness that says the guy on the bottom was screaming for help while the guy on top was beating the shit out of him, and all evidence points towards the guy on top initiating the confrontation, it's pretty unlikely that he would be able to claim self defense.


Really, you think so? The guy had a gun, how would you convict Trayvon for defending himself against someone who he claims threatened him with a gun? Can you dispute it? Can you prove Trayvon didn't see the gun, and that Zimmerman threatened him and reached for it before being tackled?

Or does your reasonable doubt just have its limits? Or biases?

Is that you just have no problem assuming that Trayvon initially assaulted George Zimmerman, but do have a problem believing that George Zimmerman could've actually threatened Trayvon?


Funny enough, the mirror case that no one has even heard about (Black man shoots white teen) the black man happened upon a group of teens and DID threaten them with a gun saying "Stay there I have a gun and am calling the cops" The teen then rushed at the man and the man shot him. The verdict was the same exact thing as the GZ trial. So your baseless hypothetical would still result in the teen being the aggressor regardless of being "threatened" with a gun.


Out of curiosity, what case are you referring to?


http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/


what you all fail to realize is the moment zimmerman "stalked" treyvon, was the moment he was the aggressor. The argument is such that treyvon could have simply just "walked away", well he was actively walking away the whole time.

It a pretty f***** up world when I can run down someone, confront them, begin to defend/attack rather then avoiding confrontation, begin to lose the mutual combat, then shoot the person to death 300 meters away from where I started running after the kid.

Did you just make all that up as you went? That isn't the facts of the case at all. You need to read up on it, rather than just believing what other people tell you.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 488 489 490 491 492 503 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
14:00
King of the Hill #219
davetesta18
Liquipedia
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Cure vs SolarLIVE!
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena18598
ComeBackTV 3791
TaKeTV 1003
Hui .710
JimRising 704
3DClanTV 367
EnkiAlexander 258
Fuzer 232
Rex232
Reynor131
CranKy Ducklings124
SpeCial65
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena18598
Hui .710
JimRising 704
Fuzer 232
Rex 232
Reynor 131
UpATreeSC 125
SpeCial 65
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3951
Horang2 3119
Shuttle 2663
Larva 877
EffOrt 708
Mini 687
BeSt 527
Stork 414
actioN 339
Soma 295
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 187
TY 124
Hyun 123
Snow 120
Rush 113
JYJ90
sorry 42
Aegong 34
sSak 31
JulyZerg 13
soO 13
Sacsri 13
Bale 3
Dota 2
Gorgc6704
420jenkins412
XaKoH 355
syndereN295
XcaliburYe251
Counter-Strike
fl0m3692
sgares421
shoxiejesuss143
oskar11
Other Games
gofns8579
singsing1944
ScreaM1591
FrodaN765
Beastyqt703
KnowMe151
ArmadaUGS100
QueenE79
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 18
• Michael_bg 6
• FirePhoenix1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV502
League of Legends
• Nemesis5453
Other Games
• Shiphtur258
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
18h 25m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
22h 25m
CSO Cup
1d
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 2h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 22h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.