EPTShooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 352
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Felnarion
442 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:33 Thieving Magpie wrote: Fine, I'll let the OP speak for me then http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map/ BCCList.com. Confirmed best website for telling you what you anyone can hear if they just listen to the tape. It's a blog. Your proof of what is on the tape is a blog. That's idiotic. | ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:38 Felnarion wrote: BCCList.com. Confirmed best website for telling you what you anyone can hear if they just listen to the tape. It's a blog. Your proof of what is on the tape is a blog. That's idiotic. I was told to stop talking about the tape, so I stopped talking about the tape. Did you not read who I was responding to. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:43 LegalLord wrote: I could've sworn that the job of a state prosecution is to convict guilty people, not pulling random BS and trying to abuse the human element of a jury to convict a person who the evidence STRONGLY suggests is innocent. You have a great name for posting in the general section >.< I dont think their job is to convict guilty people as much as it is to prosecute people accused of crimes. But i agree pulling random BS is not in the job description. | ||
|
Felnarion
442 Posts
BECAUSE OF THE ACTIONS OF ONE MAN. GEORGE. ZIMMERMAN. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
shockaslim
United States1104 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:45 Kaitlin wrote: Was that the picture of 12 year old Trayvon he just showed as "one of the last photos we will ever see of Trayvon" ? That struck me as odd as well. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:47 Kaitlin wrote: "Just tell her I killed him". Again, completely false. The state hasn't been very concerned with facts during the entire trial. I don't see them starting now. | ||
|
Felnarion
442 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:47 Kaitlin wrote: "Just tell her I killed him". Again, completely false. Of course. I mean, there's no way to convict him unless you lie about what he said...He knows what he's doing. This is the whole point of this argument, to plant things in the jury's head so that they can misremember the evidence. | ||
|
Felnarion
442 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:48 xDaunt wrote: The state hasn't been very concerned with facts during the entire trial. I don't see them starting now. Is there no way to object to a blatant lie at this point? Couldn't he just say "Zimmerman said he enjoyed killing Trayvon and bathing in his blood. Is that the kind of man you want walking among us?" | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:48 Felnarion wrote: Of course. I mean, there's no way to convict him unless you lie about what he said...He knows what he's doing. This is the whole point of this argument, to plant things in the jury's head so that they can misremember the evidence. Yeah, but his attempt at planting these things, when the jury remembers what was actually said, really really hurts his credibility, and thus the prosecution's case. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:49 Felnarion wrote: Is there no way to object to a blatant lie at this point? Couldn't he just say "Zimmerman said he enjoyed killing Trayvon and bathing in his blood. Is that the kind of man you want walking among us?" The Defense can and should object if they're paying attention. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
That's just about how I interpret this argument by the prosecution. | ||
|
jeremycafe
United States354 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:49 Felnarion wrote: Is there no way to object to a blatant lie at this point? Couldn't he just say "Zimmerman said he enjoyed killing Trayvon and bathing in his blood. Is that the kind of man you want walking among us?" I am assuming there are no objections during closings. Otherwise they would have objected to that in a heartbeat. Should be rules against blatant lies during closing like that. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:37 xDaunt wrote: Wow, I can't believe that the State tried to throw in child abuse and felony murder charges at the last moment. Total bullshit move. I can't even believe that the judge initially considered letting them get away with it. Yeah, I thought they might have something with 3rd degree murder, but the felony murder charge is totally bullshit. But then again, when you have a terrible case, its time for terrible ideas and motions. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On July 12 2013 02:49 Felnarion wrote: Is there no way to object to a blatant lie at this point? Couldn't he just say "Zimmerman said he enjoyed killing Trayvon and bathing in his blood. Is that the kind of man you want walking among us?" Objecting during closing arguments is tricky ground. Don't want to appear as trying to obstruct the government from making their argument. If it's blatently bogus, as this is, the jury isn't dumb and the point is clear without need to object. | ||
| ||
