|
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP.
If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. |
On June 27 2013 03:36 m4inbrain wrote:That's what i thought as well, or drunk or something. Edit: and i only understand a third of what she's saying. Not because she's quite, but because, well..
Because well what? You seem to have stopped your statement mid way. =)
|
"i can't see the witness" LOL
judge makes a good point
"this is the first witness your complaining about? well you can move to a different spot on your table"
|
On June 27 2013 03:34 jeremycafe wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:29 Masq wrote:On June 27 2013 03:25 Esk23 wrote:On June 27 2013 03:16 dAPhREAk wrote:On June 27 2013 03:14 Esk23 wrote:On June 27 2013 03:09 Masq wrote:On June 27 2013 03:02 Esk23 wrote: Cool, the witness ASSUMED Zimmerman was on top because she later saw images of the 12 year old Trayvon Martin pictures and assumed Zimmerman had to be the one on top because of the age difference. This is the prosecution's witness... LOL. Seeing as one of them was left laying on the ground and didn't get up, and the person on top stood up and walked away it's not much of an assumption to assume who was whom, according to her testimony. I'm sorry, I missed the part in her testimony when she said she saw the person on top get up after the shot was fired and walk away. Are you even listening/watching the video? she said that in the re-direct. the person on top walked away. Right. But she didn't actually see that. She assumed what happened based on pictures of Trayvon when he was 12 years old, that Trayvon was a small little 12 year old kid and George being in his late twenties had to have been the "bigger" one. She said she saw the bigger of the two on top. We know now that Trayvon was actually 17 and about 6'3". Two days ago, they showed video of Trayvon buying scittles and a drink standing next to the cashier who was 5'10" and he made the cashier look pretty small. While true, its sort of irrelevant to the point. Basically the 'bigger one' was on top, and got up after and walked about. The person on the bottom, didn't get up. What other information is needed? Discussing pictures and size is trivial if only one person ever got up. Why are you not listening to everything? Stop cherry picking crap the witnesses are saying without the defense's questions to them as well. She said she did not see the shot, nor the person getting up. She only saw shadows and then went inside. She cannot say who was on top before and after, its all made up in her head.
I'm not cherry picking anything. The witness specifically said she saw the person get up and walk. I could care less if the guy is innocent or guilty.
|
On June 27 2013 03:39 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:38 Esk23 wrote: LOL... who's the real racist now? HAHAHAHAH. LOL this has been more entertaining than I thought
this is just the beginning of direct ...
edit: Maybe this testimony and how it goes over will teach black people it's not okay to say nigger just because they are black.
|
It's not fair having a witness that only the prosecution can understand because she's choking on her own neck.
|
Wow, if they don't get the audio issue addressed this trial can last forever. They keep asking the witness to repeat her answers....
|
he is a nigger and a cracker? seriously.
|
Oh my god. The stereotypes....
The State absolutely has to do something to dispel all of the societal biases that are swimming around in jurors' minds right now.
|
On June 27 2013 03:41 Masq wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:34 jeremycafe wrote:On June 27 2013 03:29 Masq wrote:On June 27 2013 03:25 Esk23 wrote:On June 27 2013 03:16 dAPhREAk wrote:On June 27 2013 03:14 Esk23 wrote:On June 27 2013 03:09 Masq wrote:On June 27 2013 03:02 Esk23 wrote: Cool, the witness ASSUMED Zimmerman was on top because she later saw images of the 12 year old Trayvon Martin pictures and assumed Zimmerman had to be the one on top because of the age difference. This is the prosecution's witness... LOL. Seeing as one of them was left laying on the ground and didn't get up, and the person on top stood up and walked away it's not much of an assumption to assume who was whom, according to her testimony. I'm sorry, I missed the part in her testimony when she said she saw the person on top get up after the shot was fired and walk away. Are you even listening/watching the video? she said that in the re-direct. the person on top walked away. Right. But she didn't actually see that. She assumed what happened based on pictures of Trayvon when he was 12 years old, that Trayvon was a small little 12 year old kid and George being in his late twenties had to have been the "bigger" one. She said she saw the bigger of the two on top. We know now that Trayvon was actually 17 and about 6'3". Two days ago, they showed video of Trayvon buying scittles and a drink standing next to the cashier who was 5'10" and he made the cashier look pretty small. While true, its sort of irrelevant to the point. Basically the 'bigger one' was on top, and got up after and walked about. The person on the bottom, didn't get up. What other information is needed? Discussing pictures and size is trivial if only one person ever got up. Why are you not listening to everything? Stop cherry picking crap the witnesses are saying without the defense's questions to them as well. She said she did not see the shot, nor the person getting up. She only saw shadows and then went inside. She cannot say who was on top before and after, its all made up in her head. I'm not cherry picking anything. The witness specifically said she saw the person get up and walk. I could care less if the guy is innocent or guilty.
NO SHE DIDN'T!! She was asked if the same person who was on top, was the person walking around, and she said yes. When asked if she saw the shot, or the person get up, she said no. Put it together dude, come on.
|
On June 27 2013 03:42 Kaitlin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:39 biology]major wrote:On June 27 2013 03:38 Esk23 wrote: LOL... who's the real racist now? HAHAHAHAH. LOL this has been more entertaining than I thought this is just the beginning of direct ...
I know nothing about law, what does that mean sry
|
On June 27 2013 03:40 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:36 m4inbrain wrote:On June 27 2013 03:35 jeremycafe wrote: Is she on drugs? That's what i thought as well, or drunk or something. Edit: and i only understand a third of what she's saying. Not because she's quite, but because, well.. Because well what? You seem to have stopped your statement mid way. =)
Well, mostly because i don't know how to phrase it in english. It sounds like she's too stupid to articulate, something along these lines.
Also, is her neck getting bigger?
|
On June 27 2013 03:43 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:42 Kaitlin wrote:On June 27 2013 03:39 biology]major wrote:On June 27 2013 03:38 Esk23 wrote: LOL... who's the real racist now? HAHAHAHAH. LOL this has been more entertaining than I thought this is just the beginning of direct ... I know nothing about law, what does that mean sry it means the defense attorney hasnt asked questions yet.
|
Zimmerman walks, this is a farce.
"STAR WITNESS" LOL
|
This is so awkward watching the discrepancies between two completely different cultures.
|
On June 27 2013 03:42 Yorke wrote: It's not fair having a witness that only the prosecution can understand because she's choking on her own neck.
that is quite a neck..
|
On June 27 2013 03:43 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 03:42 Kaitlin wrote:On June 27 2013 03:39 biology]major wrote:On June 27 2013 03:38 Esk23 wrote: LOL... who's the real racist now? HAHAHAHAH. LOL this has been more entertaining than I thought this is just the beginning of direct ... I know nothing about law, what does that mean sry
She is a witness for the prosecution. Her testimony in response to their questions is called "direct examination". When the defense gets to ask their questions, it is called "cross examination" and is likely to be more confrontational and hilarious. This part is the prosecution trying to get information out of a witness who is supposed to be beneficial to their case.
|
she is getting so mad lol she is going to snap soon.
|
I can't wait for the defense to talk to her, after all that "complaining". Might be my first "black girl attitude" i see, live. ^^
|
Does this witness have a sack of marbles in her mouth?
|
The proscecution is a joke... so are their witnesses.
|
|
|
|