| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Khenra
Netherlands885 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:44 NNTP wrote: and that worked out great in Syria didn't it? unarmed demonstrations to be turned into scenes of massacre by an oppressive government And you suggest it would have been better if the people carried guns? Somehow I doubt that. | ||
|
AllSalesFinal
United States211 Posts
On February 20 2012 01:40 DOUDOU wrote: so what you are saying is, the carceral system doesn't work if ex convicts are forever doomed to a outlaw life, and don't have any rights, why not just directly hang them all? how about using them as slaves? there's no way an ex convict would try to make a life anyway Any convicts that were convicted of violent crimes should be directly hung, why not indeed. When you commit a crime you are saying you do not care about the laws of the land, so why SHOULD you have the same rights? I don't care if Joe Criminal committed a crime 10 years ago, 10 days ago or 10 minutes ago. He is a criminal, he gave up some of his rights the moment he committed the crime. | ||
|
Candadar
2049 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:44 NNTP wrote: and that worked out great in Syria didn't it? unarmed demonstrations to be turned into scenes of massacre by an oppressive government Legalize guns! So that even more people can die unnecessarily! In the name of Freedom! | ||
|
Alizee-
United States845 Posts
If the person is still a threat to society be it with a gun, a knife, a hammer, or his fists then he should remain locked up otherwise let him exercise his rights freely. | ||
|
Candadar
2049 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:48 Alizee- wrote: As a member of a gun forum that have discussed this issue dozens of times the answer is simple. Yes, they should be able to carry to the greatest extent of the law. It is a natural, God given right that the government PROTECTS rather than GRANTS. You can't grant rights, they are ours from our first breath. When you go to prison you lose that right. When you're out of prison you get that right restored. It boils down to this VERY clear and simple fact: If the person is still a threat to society be it with a gun, a knife, a hammer, or his fists then he should remain locked up otherwise let him exercise his rights freely. So someone who is shown to be mentally unstable and stabbed his parents should be granted access to walk into a Wal-Mart and grab a shotgun when he is released, because "God gave him his rights back when he was released from prison and the government shouldn't tell us what to do"? I'm lost. | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
|
Souldrinkah
Sweden48 Posts
| ||
|
NNTP
Canada47 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:46 Khenra wrote: And you suggest it would have been better if the people carried guns? Somehow I doubt that. When it comes to that, after all the talking have failed, people have the responsibility to protect their loved ones. Relying on foreign help is irresponsible. Of course it is nice to receive help but you endanger your sovereignty when you allow foreign "liberation troops" set foot on your soil as we all know nothing comes free. Foreigners do not have the same culture nor same reasons for such a war, making a deal with the devil doesn't seem like a good deal for taking care of an internal issue between brothers. | ||
|
BluePanther
United States2776 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:44 Candadar wrote: see: And just for you, I'll pick it out: First, maybe you should re-read DC v. Heller. The Supreme Court held that the second amendment protects gun use for "self-defense", not for "revolt". The ability to revolt is just one portion of "self-defense". The 2nd protects against more than the narrow protections you are giving it. And this isn't "the founding fathers". Rather, this was a compromise between the states to ratify the constitution, along with our CURRENT SUPREME COURT. Second, you can't just walk into WalMart and buy a gun. You need to have a permit. Also, the ATF monitors gun purchases rather rigorously. | ||
|
Vorgrim
Korea (North)1601 Posts
| ||
|
BluePanther
United States2776 Posts
| ||
|
Candadar
2049 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:51 BluePanther wrote: First, maybe you should re-read DC v. Heller. The Supreme Court held that the second amendment protects gun use for "self-defense", not for "revolt". The ability to revolt is just one portion of "self-defense". The 2nd protects against more than the narrow protections you are giving it. And this isn't "the founding fathers". Rather, this was a compromise between the states to ratify the constitution, along with our CURRENT SUPREME COURT. Second, you can't just walk into WalMart and buy a gun. You need to have a permit. Also, the ATF monitors gun purchases rather rigorously. When I was a kid, my father walked into Wal-Mart, showed his ID, and bought a 22 gauge shotgun to teach me how to shoot. All he had to do was show his ID and he was good. I don't know about the rest of the states, but that's horrifying that someone can do that where I used to live. | ||
|
weekendracer
United States37 Posts
On February 20 2012 01:41 Bone.be wrote: In belgium 40 % of the ex cons get back in jail within the 2 years. I don't know if the numbers are the same in the US. But I guess it's even worse (I've been to the US several times). But if the system declares someone to be ready to join back into normal life they should get the same rights as everyone, unless they are released on conditions for a certain perdiod of time. Everyone can buy a gun in the US at the age of 16. Do you think everyone at the age of 16 is rational enough to use their gun wisely? Death by gun statistics in the US are way to high, but guns are still for sale to almost everyone. To change: Don't sell guns so easely. Follow excons true their jail time and even after so they get a real chance at rejoining normal life. You have no idea what you are typing. You are not the only one, just the one I quoted. Here, a quick google search from the ATF on the actual federal law. Some states restrict this law further. http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/licensees-conduct-of-business.html#age-requirements Generally you have to be 18 to own a longarm. 21 to own a handgun. I'm talking the 'legal' definition, not the 'mah pappy gav me a gewn wen eye wus three' definition. When people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is freedom. | ||
|
Hertzy
Finland355 Posts
| ||
|
Candadar
2049 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:55 weekendracer wrote: You have no idea what you are typing. You are not the only one, just the one I quoted. Here, a quick google search from the ATF on the actual federal law. Some states restrict this law further. http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/licensees-conduct-of-business.html#age-requirements Generally you have to be 18 to own a longarm. 21 to own a handgun. I'm talking the 'legal' definition, not the 'mah pappy gav me a gewn wen eye wus three' definition. When people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is freedom. How about a world where neither fears neither? Crazy, right? | ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
|
Yongwang
United States196 Posts
| ||
|
Candadar
2049 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:57 Yongwang wrote: Wow I'm actually a little surprised at how many naive authoritarian lefties there are here. It's really quite sad that some people here hate freedom as much as they do. I'm not calling out any members in particular, just making an observation. Fucking classic. Call anyone who disagrees with you an "authoritarian lefty" and that they "hate freedom" That's about my cue to leave the thread, when this kind of shit is being slung. Twas' fun. One more note though: On February 20 2012 03:00 llKenZyll wrote: Well you cant just walk around with a gun in the USA either.... Yes, yes you can. If you got a permit, you can walk around with a gun in your waistband or an automatic weapon in your trunk if you so wish, completely legally. | ||
|
llKenZyll
United States853 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:53 Vorgrim wrote: I'm glad nobody is allowed to freely carry an armed weapon in my country. Going hunting? Sure, not for going to the store. Well you cant just walk around with a gun in the USA either.... | ||
|
NNTP
Canada47 Posts
On February 20 2012 02:57 Yongwang wrote: Wow I'm actually a little surprised at how many naive authoritarian lefties there are here. It's really quite sad that some people here hate freedom as much as they do. I'm not calling out any members in particular, just making an observation. Not surprising as we are on a gaming forum  I used to think the world could be forever peaceful without the use of violence as mahatma Gandhi preached but growing up, I found out that in all of civilization and in the animal kingdom this is not realistic. I am not saying we should not try to attain this but however honorable such a quest is, we must look reality into the eye and realize and see it as it is. Even Gandhi preached the use of "JUSTIFIED" violence. | ||
| ||
Maestros of the Game
Group C
Serral vs Percival
SHIN vs ShoWTimE
RotterdaM1448
IntoTheiNu
 1139ComeBackTV
 1076TaKeTV
 617SteadfastSC259
IndyStarCraft
 233BRAT_OK
 88[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 RotterdaM StarCraft: Brood War 1448SteadfastSC  259IndyStarCraft 233Ryung  161Rex 127UpATreeSC 98BRAT_OK 88ProTech78 trigger 34Codebar 23Britney Dota 2  20394Calm  6609Shuttle 812Mini 591ggaemo 208Dewaltoss 110Free 65firebathero  59910 20Rock 17[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games Grubby3874 singsing2089 FrodaN952 Beastyqt686 B2W.Neo588 XaKoH 181C9.Mang0165 crisheroes146 ArmadaUGS117 KnowMe78 Trikslyr56 Mew2King46 MindelVK10 |
|
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Maestros of the Game
Clem vs Lambo
Zoun vs SKillous
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Solar vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Grudge Match
FlaShFTW vs A.Alm
OSC
GSL
herO vs Rogue
Maru vs Cure
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
