|
The ban is terrible in my opinion. If there's a demand for it, there's going to be a supply one way or the other...
Plus having the ban in Toronto, or all of Canada or all of North America even isn't gonna change anything globally. The Chinese are still gonna hunt the hell out of it and make soups.
Let them kill all of them and then cry about it when they're all gone, who cares.
|
This is terrible. We should definitely stop killing those poor sharks just for their fins and throwing them back into the water helplessly, dying amidst the ever-degrading aquatic biosphere. THE PROBLEM IS A HUGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE SURVIVE BY MAKING MONEY BY FISHING THOSE SHARKS. We now have a double-face problem. Let sharks live and people die? or sharks die and people live? Where is the justice? Do we need absolute justice? Is money, once again, in the middle of the problem? Why??? WHY???
|
There is a difference between shark finning and other forms of commercialized fishing. Shark finners only keep the fins while tossing the rest of the shark so they can fit more in their boat. Shark products are used in other things. Shark liver oil is used in cosmetics and the shark is one of the many types of fish they grind into fishsticks. However, the shark finners will only keep the most profitable part of the shark because using the whole animal doesn't make them as much money. Not to say that commercialized fishing has its own problems, with a ratio of bycatch to target species at 6:1 or even higher in some areas. It's quite awful.
I think the argument of the morality behind shark finning and the legislation needs to be separated. Regulation is completely useless if it can't be enforced. And the trade will still exist, people will find ways of obtaining the stuff they want. It could even cause an increase in demand of shark fins because it's a "rare delicacy". As I said before, education needs to be our biggest weapon. If we can convince the consumers about the harms involved with purchasing and consuming shark fins, then we will take power away from the harvesters who continue this practice in order to make more money.
|
On October 27 2011 04:31 repsac wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 04:18 Warlike Prince wrote:I think the problem is that everyone thinks that fishers ALWAYS just take the fin and throw the rest back. Just because that happens doesnt mean everyone does it. I have only eaten it a few times but its good and I would like to have it again sometime the ONLY reason there should be a ban it that the animal is endangered and not "some moral animal rights hocus-pocus" That being said I am a firm believer that most animals will have to go eventually to make room for more people. Just keep a DNA sample of everything and clone them for the zoo edit: On October 27 2011 04:13 ninazerg wrote: I think this is a travesty of legislation that was done for purely political reasons and heads should roll for this. I love eating sharks and anyone who stands in the way of that should be eaten by a shark. i agree that it was done for purely political reasons, if that picture of all those finned sharks was never spread around the web this likely would not have happened People need to start caring about their fellow humans as much as they care about animals that would gladly kill them and gladly kill and eat anything they want all the time what does it matter, removing the fin kills the shark. is your retarded, primitive, and outmoded tradition worth killing sharks so that you and people like you can eat something of negligible nutritional value just so that you can feel better about yourselves?
"what does it matter, removing the fin kills the shark" so you are ok as long as the whole shark is used. I dont think it should be legal to fin it and throw it back, but not for moral reasons, because I dont like to be wastefull
im white and have only eaten it a couple times, its not my tradition but I do like it. You seem enraged at what animals people like to eat but do you get this mad about the countless wars going on aroudn the world. You likely eat beef and chicken, why is it different
I guess my views are way different than the current norm, animals are animals, people are people, and I would gladly extinct and entire speices to save 1 human life
Honestly all this talk about shark fin and wasted parts makes me really wanna try a shark steak
Also way to dodge the part where i said that not all fishers just fin it and leave it to die, just people some people do doesnt means they all do.
|
On October 27 2011 04:36 Warlike Prince wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 04:27 LeaD wrote:On October 27 2011 04:18 Warlike Prince wrote: I think the problem is that everyone thinks that fishers ALWAYS just take the fin and throw the rest back. Just because that happens doesnt mean everyone does it.
I have only eaten it a few times but its good and I would like to have it again sometime
the ONLY reason there should be a ban it that the animal is endangered and not "some moral animal rights hocus-pocus"
That being said I am a firm believer that most animals will have to go eventually to make room for more people. Just keep a DNA sample of everything and clone them for the zoo Do you not read any other posts in this thread? The fin adds nothing to the soup, the taste comes from the broth. It's a status symbol. So, do people live in the ocean now? Are sharks taking up that 2/3 of the world that we don't live in? We need to get rid of them! Yes, let's just kill any animal we want, keep the DNA and who knows how long down the road, after the worlds ecosystems are irreparably damaged, we'll be able to clone the animals and put them back! Genius. not put them back ... put them in zoos, eventally there will be no room for animals. Read my other post, thats just my thoughts on animals in general, not necessarily sharks in this situation. Also eventually there will be water based citys because we can only go up and down so far Right now thjere is 7 billion, how long till 70 billion or even 700 billion. How long can we care about what happens to other species before it effects the numbers of our own?
The fin adds no taste, its good that they are banning it! and to be fair to you mate, 70 billion ? 700 billion? gota be joking right haha, by the time we reach like 12+ the planets resources and food will be short
|
On October 27 2011 04:47 sorrowptoss wrote: This is terrible. We should definitely stop killing those poor sharks just for their fins and throwing them back into the water helplessly, dying amidst the ever-degrading aquatic biosphere. THE PROBLEM IS A HUGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE SURVIVE BY MAKING MONEY BY FISHING THOSE SHARKS. We now have a double-face problem. Let sharks live and people die? or sharks die and people live? Where is the justice? Do we need absolute justice? Is money, once again, in the middle of the problem? Why??? WHY???
Tons of random species go extinct all the time. mostly they're some obscure insects or plants or fungi... Whatever, who cares, it's gonna happen. If the Chinese really want to shell out tons of money for some random shark fin, then the Sharks are gonna get killed either way.
Why turn law-abiding citizens making a living into criminals?
|
Ban it immediately, should have been done before, and if it really is banned, there will still be ALOT of shark cruelty like that, the Ban is the first step, and a big one, i really hope it gets banned!
|
On October 27 2011 04:49 ydeer93 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 04:36 Warlike Prince wrote:On October 27 2011 04:27 LeaD wrote:On October 27 2011 04:18 Warlike Prince wrote: I think the problem is that everyone thinks that fishers ALWAYS just take the fin and throw the rest back. Just because that happens doesnt mean everyone does it.
I have only eaten it a few times but its good and I would like to have it again sometime
the ONLY reason there should be a ban it that the animal is endangered and not "some moral animal rights hocus-pocus"
That being said I am a firm believer that most animals will have to go eventually to make room for more people. Just keep a DNA sample of everything and clone them for the zoo Do you not read any other posts in this thread? The fin adds nothing to the soup, the taste comes from the broth. It's a status symbol. So, do people live in the ocean now? Are sharks taking up that 2/3 of the world that we don't live in? We need to get rid of them! Yes, let's just kill any animal we want, keep the DNA and who knows how long down the road, after the worlds ecosystems are irreparably damaged, we'll be able to clone the animals and put them back! Genius. not put them back ... put them in zoos, eventally there will be no room for animals. Read my other post, thats just my thoughts on animals in general, not necessarily sharks in this situation. Also eventually there will be water based citys because we can only go up and down so far Right now thjere is 7 billion, how long till 70 billion or even 700 billion. How long can we care about what happens to other species before it effects the numbers of our own? The fin adds no taste, its good that they are banning it! and to be fair to you mate, 70 billion ? 700 billion? gota be joking right haha, by the time we reach like 12+ the planets resources and food will be short
You have no idea how big the planet is do you, or how much room we have? also try to imagine a thousand years down the road mile high buildings that ue some floors for trees / plants for air and some floors for animals to eat. Now imagine every inch of land mass covered in them. 700 billion completely possible. 70 billion easy with current tech
|
On October 26 2011 18:41 T.O.P. wrote: It's an example of the majority infringing on the rights of the minority. The law unfairly targets people of Chinese descent by banning one of their cultural traditions.
lol don't just play the race card. It shouldn't receive any special treatment just for being a cultural tradition.
+ Show Spoiler +Spartans and other cultures killed weak looking babies Cannibalism was a tradition in some societies Human sacrifice has been a tradition in a lot of societies etc etc
The above is a stupid comparison but I've just stuck in extreme examples to illustrate my point.
It has nothing to do with targeting people of Chinese descent. It has everything to do with ethics, and more importantly sustaining the environment (by not over-fishing species into extinction).
It just so happens that a large portion of the affected people are of Chinese descent, as it relates to one of their traditions.
|
On October 27 2011 04:47 sorrowptoss wrote: This is terrible. We should definitely stop killing those poor sharks just for their fins and throwing them back into the water helplessly, dying amidst the ever-degrading aquatic biosphere. THE PROBLEM IS A HUGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE SURVIVE BY MAKING MONEY BY FISHING THOSE SHARKS. We now have a double-face problem. Let sharks live and people die? or sharks die and people live? Where is the justice? Do we need absolute justice? Is money, once again, in the middle of the problem? Why??? WHY???
Do you honestly believe that stopping this activity will result in people dieing?.... Are you kidding me?
|
On October 27 2011 01:40 fush wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 01:35 Geovu wrote:On October 26 2011 20:10 OuchyDathurts wrote: No soup is worth more than $5 and even that is pushing it. My friend, that is one of the biggest lies I have ever had. I would gladly pay $20+ for soup as prepared properly it is one of the most delicious foods ever created. Maybe you should stop buying canned tomato, chicken and cream of mushroom soup, go to a nice restaurant and order a soup as a starter. You won't regret it. Shark fin soup on the other hand, is not such a kind of soup. If shark fins can really get replaced by pig gelatin of all things as well as the fact that (Apparently according to Ramsey aka world's most famous chef) all the flavour comes from chicken broth then I do not see any reason as to why this soup should exist. On October 26 2011 21:25 SolidGasPro wrote: Nobody cares about the many slain pigs and chickens abundant in our everyday menu, but if we talk about Asians slaying sharks or kittens everybody freaks out.
Double standards? The majority of pigs and cows that come from reputable local butchers are killed in the most humane way possible. Chickens kind of get the short end of the stick but free rangers on local farms are also treated humanely.
Sharks on the other hand? Show me one video of a single shark being humanely killed and I will agree with you. don't make me laugh. you think supermarkets are supplied by "reputable" local butchers? how do you enforce this "humane" killing anyway, you willing to pay your tax dollars to community watchdogs? it's not even the killing - it's the raising of the animals that can be considered ethically/humanely questionable. i personally turn a blind eye to it since i love meat, but if you're going to use this as an argument for "inhumane" killing of sharks, then you're awfully misinformed or naive.
Where did I say supermarkets are supplied by reputable butchers? Obviously if pick up some prepackaged frozen beef at Superstore you have no idea what kind of life it lived.
It's the smaller shops, or get them straight from the people that raised the animals. I wasn't even arguing against shark killing, I was just making the point that not every animal you eat (Unless you go to Superstore) was raised in a cage and slaughtered cruelly, and that you probably can't find that with shark fins.
|
On October 27 2011 04:36 Warlike Prince wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 04:27 LeaD wrote:On October 27 2011 04:18 Warlike Prince wrote: I think the problem is that everyone thinks that fishers ALWAYS just take the fin and throw the rest back. Just because that happens doesnt mean everyone does it.
I have only eaten it a few times but its good and I would like to have it again sometime
the ONLY reason there should be a ban it that the animal is endangered and not "some moral animal rights hocus-pocus"
That being said I am a firm believer that most animals will have to go eventually to make room for more people. Just keep a DNA sample of everything and clone them for the zoo Do you not read any other posts in this thread? The fin adds nothing to the soup, the taste comes from the broth. It's a status symbol. So, do people live in the ocean now? Are sharks taking up that 2/3 of the world that we don't live in? We need to get rid of them! Yes, let's just kill any animal we want, keep the DNA and who knows how long down the road, after the worlds ecosystems are irreparably damaged, we'll be able to clone the animals and put them back! Genius. not put them back ... put them in zoos, eventally there will be no room for animals. Read my other post, thats just my thoughts on animals in general, not necessarily sharks in this situation. Also eventually there will be water based citys because we can only go up and down so far Right now thjere is 7 billion, how long till 70 billion or even 700 billion. How long can we care about what happens to other species before it effects the numbers of our own?
If there eventually will be no more room for animals, then there will be no more room for us either. Even though we don't specifically need the meat from animals to survive, animals are needed for many many plants to reproduce, get nutrients etc. We can't prioritize ourselves over animals forever, in the end that will be the end of us aswell. Our focus should be to try to limit our own population, not to try to make room for an increase. We're already operating at a level that's not sustainable. And once again shark fin soup has _nothing_ to do with our own survival, its a vanity treat that's very low on nutrients, as all meat from apex predators is. Meat from apex predators is more often than not actually harmful to eat because toxins accumulate the higher you get in the food-chain. And if you look at shark populations, most of the sharks used for fin-soup has decreased by roughly 70% in the last 20-30 years. At this rate sharks will become extinct in the upcoming decades. And without sharks the eco-systems will collapse and who knows what species might become extinct as a result of this? maybe a species that actually is of great importance for our survival. Stop being so blind and realise that we cannot live alone on this planet we need the other species aswell.
|
So what's the difference between farming sharks for their fins and farming cows/pigs/fish ? Is it fine if people set up shark farms?
|
I addressed that issue before. Villages that used to rely on fishing for their main source of income have turned to ecotourism because of the lack of fish. It turns out to be more profitable than fishing.
The people who rely on shark finning for their income will find another way to survive. The sharks, however, won't, as without fins they will sink to the bottom of the ocean and perish.
Edit: Shark farms won't be very effective because sharks take a long time to reproduce (not until their twenties). If you want them to live long enough to keep a healthy supply of sharks AND harvest their fins for money, then your business will not do very well.
|
This ban is fantastic. It's a tragedy that such destruction of the oceans' ecosystems has progressed as far as it has. I feel that our recognition of our ability to cause irreversible damage to the Earth as a practically closed system is one of the most important things to happen in the last few decades.
There are valid points against this ban: One is the harm the collapse of an industry may cause to individuals. Don't harmful, outdated industries deserve to be put to rest? What happened to the fluorocarbon industry when we discovered it burning our ozone layer? We axed it.
Two is the cultural significance of shark fin. Could we not look at creating a synthetic replacement? It may have been a part of past culture, but it is no longer practical. Some of my ancestor's past-times included colonial subjugation of native populations, but no one is clamouring for that. Historical importance is not enough to justify unsustainable activites.
Oh yeah, cutting the fins off of sharks is immoral. But that's relative, so not really a valid argument.
|
On October 27 2011 04:53 Warlike Prince wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 04:49 ydeer93 wrote:On October 27 2011 04:36 Warlike Prince wrote:On October 27 2011 04:27 LeaD wrote:On October 27 2011 04:18 Warlike Prince wrote: I think the problem is that everyone thinks that fishers ALWAYS just take the fin and throw the rest back. Just because that happens doesnt mean everyone does it.
I have only eaten it a few times but its good and I would like to have it again sometime
the ONLY reason there should be a ban it that the animal is endangered and not "some moral animal rights hocus-pocus"
That being said I am a firm believer that most animals will have to go eventually to make room for more people. Just keep a DNA sample of everything and clone them for the zoo Do you not read any other posts in this thread? The fin adds nothing to the soup, the taste comes from the broth. It's a status symbol. So, do people live in the ocean now? Are sharks taking up that 2/3 of the world that we don't live in? We need to get rid of them! Yes, let's just kill any animal we want, keep the DNA and who knows how long down the road, after the worlds ecosystems are irreparably damaged, we'll be able to clone the animals and put them back! Genius. not put them back ... put them in zoos, eventally there will be no room for animals. Read my other post, thats just my thoughts on animals in general, not necessarily sharks in this situation. Also eventually there will be water based citys because we can only go up and down so far Right now thjere is 7 billion, how long till 70 billion or even 700 billion. How long can we care about what happens to other species before it effects the numbers of our own? The fin adds no taste, its good that they are banning it! and to be fair to you mate, 70 billion ? 700 billion? gota be joking right haha, by the time we reach like 12+ the planets resources and food will be short You have no idea how big the planet is do you, or how much room we have? also try to imagine a thousand years down the road mile high buildings that ue some floors for trees / plants for air and some floors for animals to eat. Now imagine every inch of land mass covered in them. 700 billion completely possible. 70 billion easy with current tech
What kind of sci-fi world do you live in? Where the hell would you get the material for these building?
|
I like it, but I do think it should be ban if that's the way they are getting it.
|
sigh... this is part of tradition, and to all the haters, what if the city you lived in banned turkey? i know thats a bad example, but still
|
There's a difference between eating something for nourishment and killing a whole animal and only eat a small part of it just to show your friends how rich and awesome you are.
|
On October 27 2011 04:49 Warlike Prince wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2011 04:31 repsac wrote:On October 27 2011 04:18 Warlike Prince wrote:I think the problem is that everyone thinks that fishers ALWAYS just take the fin and throw the rest back. Just because that happens doesnt mean everyone does it. I have only eaten it a few times but its good and I would like to have it again sometime the ONLY reason there should be a ban it that the animal is endangered and not "some moral animal rights hocus-pocus" That being said I am a firm believer that most animals will have to go eventually to make room for more people. Just keep a DNA sample of everything and clone them for the zoo edit: On October 27 2011 04:13 ninazerg wrote: I think this is a travesty of legislation that was done for purely political reasons and heads should roll for this. I love eating sharks and anyone who stands in the way of that should be eaten by a shark. i agree that it was done for purely political reasons, if that picture of all those finned sharks was never spread around the web this likely would not have happened People need to start caring about their fellow humans as much as they care about animals that would gladly kill them and gladly kill and eat anything they want all the time what does it matter, removing the fin kills the shark. is your retarded, primitive, and outmoded tradition worth killing sharks so that you and people like you can eat something of negligible nutritional value just so that you can feel better about yourselves? "what does it matter, removing the fin kills the shark" so you are ok as long as the whole shark is used. I dont think it should be legal to fin it and throw it back, but not for moral reasons, because I dont like to be wastefull
the problem with sharks is the mecury levels. there are warnings from food safety groups and organizations around the world regarding mercury levels in sharks because they at the top of the food chain.
|
|
|
|