• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:50
CEST 08:50
KST 15:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting6[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO65.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)75Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition325.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)119
StarCraft 2
General
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting Revisiting the game after10 years and wow it's bad 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) The New Patch Killed Mech! Ladder Impersonation (only maybe)
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
BW caster Sayle Map with fog of war removed for one player? Pros React To: BarrackS + FlaSh Coaching vs SnOw After 20 seasons we have a lot of great maps Whose hotkey signature is this?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Semifinal A
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Siegecraft - a new perspective TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640} TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Inbreeding: Why Do We Do It…
Peanutsc
From Tilt to Ragequit:The Ps…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1042 users

CERN finds neutrinos faster than light - Page 43

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 41 42 43 44 45 53 Next
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
November 18 2011 06:16 GMT
#841
I want to make a Mussolini made the neutrinos arrive on time joke but these results are very significant. I hope the tests at Fermi Lab and other places will really confirm this.
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
nam nam
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden4672 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-18 09:46:57
November 18 2011 09:45 GMT
#842
On November 18 2011 15:10 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
The OPERA Collaboration sent to the Cornell Arxiv a new preprint today, where they summarize the results of their analysis, expanded with additional statistical tests, and including the check performed with 20 additional neutrino interactions they collected in the last few weeks. These few extra timing measurements crucially allow the ruling out of some potential unaccounted sources of systematic uncertainty, notably ones connected to the knowledge of the proton spill time distribution.

These benefits come from CERN, where proton bunches have been made much shorter: down to three nanosecond long pulses. That means that OPERA can measure the speed of each detected neutrino separately! Of course, with such short pulses, the statistics of protons on target is "only" of 4x10^16, but this is still enough to reach meaningful results from the additional data.
The figure below show the timing structure of the proton bunches. The black arrow spans 20 nanoseconds to size up the horizontal scale.

[image loading]

As a sidebar to the improvements yielded by the reduction in the pulse duration, and the related checks that were performed on the source, apparently allowed CERN to spot some less than perfect sinchronisms in the apparatus responsible for the creation of the beam. In particular, the horns that focalize the beam are brought to the right magnetic field by currents that are ramped up before the particles pass through them. It transpired that due to some imperfect arrangement, the currents might still have been ramping up during the passage of the particles, with the result that the focusing of the beam could be less good than predicted.

This might bring into the Opera speed measurement some systematics due to the fact that the neutrinos produced later -the trailing ones from the spill- woud be better focused (field closer to plateau in the horns). However, this potential issue is made irrelevant by working with very narrow proton pulses (however ramping, the current is practically constant during a very narrow proton spill).

So what does OPERA find ? Their main result, based on the 15,233 neutrino interactions collected in three years of data taking, is unchanged from the September result. The most interesting part of the new publication is instead that the find that the 20 new neutrino events (where neutrino speeds are individually measured, as opposed to the combined measurement done with the three-year data published in September) confirm the earlier result: the arrival times appear to occur about 60 nanoseconds before they are expected.

The figure below, taken from the paper, shows the individual timing measurements of the neutrino interactions from the narrow spills taken between end of October and beginning of November. The red line indicates the average of the 20 measurements.

[image loading]

It is necessary here to note that since distance from source to detector and time offsets necessary to determine the travel time of neutrinos have not been remeasured, the related systematics (estimated as well as -possibly- underestimated ones) are unchanged. The measurement therefore is only a "partial" confirmation of the earlier result: it is consistent with it, but could be just as wrong as the other.

Just to make an example, I will reiterate here the doubts I have on one of the time offsets necessary to obtain the timing measurement in Gran Sasso: an 8-km-long light guide brings in a 40,000+-1 ns offset: in order to determine a "delta t" of 60 nanoseconds, a subtraction of that large number has to be made. This offset was measured three years ago, and could have changed if the refraction index had changed even very slightly (e.g. due to aging of the plastic material). This offset was not remeasured in the new analysis, and the possible associated systematic uncertainty remains in my mind an issue.


Rest of article


Thanks for posting.

On November 18 2011 15:16 Antisocialmunky wrote:
I want to make a Mussolini made the neutrinos arrive on time joke but these results are very significant. I hope the tests at Fermi Lab and other places will really confirm this.


Then we can look forward to many years of WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?!?
radiatoren
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Denmark1907 Posts
November 19 2011 01:45 GMT
#843
It is a pretty significant thing to be able to recreate the result with changes to the experimental setup! Now the main experiment is more or less confirmed, as in physically acceptable. The rest of the research will most likely focus on the side experiments, with calibrations and measurements of the very precise methods used to find delays and distance. That will be what is happening regardless of the other experiments with other detectors, simply because the result will have to change some of the prerequirements for particle physics most basic equations if it cannot be denied.
Repeat before me
ddrddrddrddr
Profile Joined August 2010
1344 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-20 14:00:38
November 20 2011 14:00 GMT
#844
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15791236
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8898436/Re-run-of-experiment-that-contradicts-Einstein-yields-same-result.html

Shit just got real. Previous results confirmed in redo!!!!
Onioncookie
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany624 Posts
November 20 2011 14:04 GMT
#845
Wow ... so in short they proved , that they were right? o.O
Telcontar
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom16710 Posts
November 20 2011 14:05 GMT
#846
On November 20 2011 23:04 Onioncookie wrote:
Wow ... so in short they proved , that they were right? o.O

It still has to go through peer scrutiny again, but it looks likely that the results are accurate. We'll see though.
Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta.
zeru
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
8156 Posts
November 20 2011 14:06 GMT
#847
--- Nuked ---
Robstickle
Profile Joined April 2010
Great Britain406 Posts
November 20 2011 14:08 GMT
#848
On November 20 2011 23:04 Onioncookie wrote:
Wow ... so in short they proved , that they were right? o.O


Not yet, there are still quite a few other things that could explain this result without the neutrinos going FTL. It'll be years before they're done checking all the things they think it could be.
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
November 20 2011 14:52 GMT
#849
On November 20 2011 23:05 Telcontar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2011 23:04 Onioncookie wrote:
Wow ... so in short they proved , that they were right? o.O

It still has to go through peer scrutiny again, but it looks likely that the results are accurate. We'll see though.


It just means that their results are precise but its up in the air as whether they are accurate until it gets recreated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4926 Posts
November 20 2011 15:09 GMT
#850
On November 20 2011 23:52 Antisocialmunky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2011 23:05 Telcontar wrote:
On November 20 2011 23:04 Onioncookie wrote:
Wow ... so in short they proved , that they were right? o.O

It still has to go through peer scrutiny again, but it looks likely that the results are accurate. We'll see though.


It just means that their results are precise but its up in the air as whether they are accurate until it gets recreated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision

Exactly.
ddrddrddrddr
Profile Joined August 2010
1344 Posts
November 20 2011 16:02 GMT
#851
They would be total idiots after listening to criticism if they make the same mistake twice. Either everyone's missed the mistake up until now, or our mind's about to be blown.
Zzoram
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada7115 Posts
November 20 2011 16:07 GMT
#852
There are still other possible sources of error they need to rule out, but this second experiments makes it more likely to be true.

If this ends up being confirmed over the next few years, it means we can send messages back in time!
Nizaris
Profile Joined May 2010
Belgium2230 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-20 16:12:21
November 20 2011 16:10 GMT
#853
just thought i'd post that here..

Tommaso Dorigo, a physicist at CERN, noted on his blog that there are still other possible sources of error. For instance, the OPERA collaboration’s clock might not have a fine enough resolution to determine exactly when the neutrinos arrived. “The measurement therefore is only a ‘partial’ confirmation of the earlier result: It is consistent with it, but could be just as wrong as the other,” he wrote.

Ultimately, the only thing that would convince many in the field is if another team upholds the findings in an independent experiment. Plunkett, co-spokesperson for the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) experiment at Fermilab, says that his collaboration expects to have results checking the OPERA findings in the spring of 2012.


http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/11/neutrinos-screw-einstein/
Suisen
Profile Joined April 2011
256 Posts
November 20 2011 16:10 GMT
#854
Given that the measurements are both precise and accurate, almost no one believes what is measured is actually neutrinos violating the speed of light. In that case they must have some trick or loophole. There might be 7 spacial dimensions. Maybe neutrinos take shortcuts through dimensions unlike any other matter known so far. This is pure speculation just meant to give an idea.
SeaSwift
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Scotland4486 Posts
November 20 2011 16:22 GMT
#855
On November 21 2011 01:10 Suisen wrote:
Given that the measurements are both precise and accurate, almost no one believes what is measured is actually neutrinos violating the speed of light. In that case they must have some trick or loophole. There might be 7 spacial dimensions. Maybe neutrinos take shortcuts through dimensions unlike any other matter known so far. This is pure speculation just meant to give an idea.


Yeah. I'm still at school, so I don't really know what I'm doing commenting in this thread, but I remember watching a TV programme about the neutrinos possibly travelling through something called the "bulk" (?), which was basically skipping through dimensions.
Deadeight
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United Kingdom1629 Posts
November 20 2011 20:02 GMT
#856
On November 21 2011 01:22 SeaSwift wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2011 01:10 Suisen wrote:
Given that the measurements are both precise and accurate, almost no one believes what is measured is actually neutrinos violating the speed of light. In that case they must have some trick or loophole. There might be 7 spacial dimensions. Maybe neutrinos take shortcuts through dimensions unlike any other matter known so far. This is pure speculation just meant to give an idea.


Yeah. I'm still at school, so I don't really know what I'm doing commenting in this thread, but I remember watching a TV programme about the neutrinos possibly travelling through something called the "bulk" (?), which was basically skipping through dimensions.


Yeah bulk, but more normally called membrane I think.
DTrain
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia64 Posts
November 21 2011 05:52 GMT
#857
Another group of Italian scientists are now rejecting the faster than light result claiming that the neutrinos arrived with too much energy to have traveled faster than light.


An international team of scientists in Italy studying the same neutrino particles colleagues say appear to have travelled faster than light rejected the startling finding this weekend, saying their tests had shown it must be wrong.



They argue, on the basis of recently published studies by two top US physicists, that the neutrinos pumped down from CERN, near Geneva, should have lost most of their energy if they had travelled at even a tiny fraction faster than light.

But in fact, the ICARUS scientists say, the neutrino beam as tested in their equipment registered an energy spectrum fully corresponding with what it should be for particles travelling at the speed of light and no more.


http://tvnz.co.nz/technology-news/faster-than-light-particle-finding-refuted-4554490
ryanAnger
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States838 Posts
November 21 2011 05:55 GMT
#858
On November 21 2011 14:52 DTrain wrote:
Another group of Italian scientists are now rejecting the faster than light result claiming that the neutrinos arrived with too much energy to have traveled faster than light.

Show nested quote +

An international team of scientists in Italy studying the same neutrino particles colleagues say appear to have travelled faster than light rejected the startling finding this weekend, saying their tests had shown it must be wrong.


Show nested quote +

They argue, on the basis of recently published studies by two top US physicists, that the neutrinos pumped down from CERN, near Geneva, should have lost most of their energy if they had travelled at even a tiny fraction faster than light.

But in fact, the ICARUS scientists say, the neutrino beam as tested in their equipment registered an energy spectrum fully corresponding with what it should be for particles travelling at the speed of light and no more.


http://tvnz.co.nz/technology-news/faster-than-light-particle-finding-refuted-4554490


How could they use this argument as a basis to disprove this at all? If the neutrinos are indeed traveling faster than light, they've already broken all the rules, why would they also strictly adhere to this mass rule?
On my way...
DTrain
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia64 Posts
November 21 2011 06:58 GMT
#859
I did some more reading about it and I think this is what they are suggesting:

The speed of light in a vacuum is a constant. However through other mediums light may travel significantly slower. For example in water light only travels at 75% of the speed of light in a vacuum.

Matter is not limited by this same limit so can still travel up to 100% of the speed of light in a vacuum when it travels through water. This means that it is possible for matter to travel faster through certain mediums than light is able to travel. When this occurs Cherenkov radiation is released which reduces the energy of the matter.

What the ICARUS scientists are implying is that when matter travels faster than light through a vacuum medium, there should also be a release of radiation (some analog to Cherenkov radiation). This would reduce the energy of the neutrinos received.

I'm not sure how they can know for sure whether or not this radiation would actually occur. It seems to be extrapolating outside of the realms of known physics. The article explaining it is here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6562

If this is true however, it implies that the neutrinos are spending most of their travel time at or below the speed of light.
So either there is some source of error in the CERN experiment, or the neutrinos are jumping and traveling a short distance very quickly, then slowing down and traveling the rest of the way at or below the speed of light.
BlueRoyaL
Profile Blog Joined February 2006
United States2493 Posts
November 21 2011 08:35 GMT
#860
found a documentary with a professor talking about the possibility of the fnidings and its possible implications

http://www.1channel.ch/watch-2728889-Faster-Than-The-Speed-Of-Light

havent watched it yet though
WHAT'S HAPPENIN
Prev 1 41 42 43 44 45 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
PiGosaur Cup #53
Liquipedia
OSC
23:00
OSC Masters Cup #150 Qual #1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 1
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 496
Snow 194
Pusan 180
Shinee 62
NaDa 37
Hm[arnc] 31
Bale 29
GoRush 13
IntoTheRainbow 9
Sea 0
Dota 2
monkeys_forever872
NeuroSwarm108
League of Legends
JimRising 792
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K402
shoxiejesuss153
Other Games
summit1g5921
C9.Mang0222
Tasteless94
Mew2King70
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL8084
Other Games
gamesdonequick1129
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH245
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1158
• Lourlo594
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
3h 10m
OSC
5h 10m
Wardi Open
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Safe House 2
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Safe House 2
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.