Republican nominations - Page 239

On January 08 2012 12:38 JinDesu wrote:
ABC's group discussing the debates is pretty anti-China or anti-Huntsman, or both

On January 08 2012 12:42 TotalBalanceSC2 wrote:
wait why are they saying goodnight if they are saying there is more to come???

On January 08 2012 12:52 Heff87 wrote:
Ron Paul because he openly opposes SOPA

On January 08 2012 12:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
So to summarize the debate: Ron Paul makes valid points especially about Drug Policy, Gingrich wants WWIII, Santorum hates the Gays, Arabs, etc. Romney thinks John Adams wrote the Constitution and doges a tax loophole question, Perry was just there, Huntsman had a very good performance.

On January 08 2012 12:56 GGTeMpLaR wrote:


Sounds pretty agreeable to me.

This these post-show analysts are pretty silly though lol, it just seems like they're trying to sway votes one way or another

On January 08 2012 12:56 GGTeMpLaR wrote:


Sounds pretty agreeable to me.

This these post-show analysts are pretty silly though lol, it just seems like they're trying to sway votes one way or another

We're back. And it's Rick Santorum's mad notion that states have the right to ban contraception. Does Mitt Romney think that states have the right to ban contraception? "But no state wants to," complains Mitt, although he does say he thinks no state would want to ban contraception nor should they.

Eventually the moderater draws Mitt Romney into saying that he doesn't think there's a right to privacy in the constitution, as declared by Griswold v Connecticutt, which established a right to privacy.

Ron Paul is next up and he gives chapter and verse on the fourth amendment and the right to privacy.

Now Rick Santorum appears to side with Romney on the Griswold v Connecticutt question.

For those of you confused by this, it's a long story but since Roe v Wade was predicated by Griswold (I'm glossing over things here), stanch anti-abortion types such as Santorum want to see Griswold overturned as a means of undermining Roe v Wade. So this isn't about privacy or contraception, really, but abortion.