• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 02:28
CET 08:28
KST 16:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview11Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)39
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 Not at the Esports World Cup 2026 HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 28 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) KSL Week 85 OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open!
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Let's Get Creative–Video Gam…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1711 users

72 hours to end World's most senseless War! - Page 8

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 21 Next All
RoosterSamurai
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Japan2108 Posts
May 31 2011 21:43 GMT
#141
Does anyone else here actually think they should be regulating some of the stuff they put in foods? MSG is probably addictive, and I'm sure all the preservatives they spam in fast food is horrible for you.
LegendaryZ
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1583 Posts
May 31 2011 21:46 GMT
#142
On June 01 2011 06:32 PanN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2011 06:00 LegendaryZ wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:43 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:18 Deadlyfish wrote:
Strongly disagree with this. I've lived in Panama for a long time, where drugs are a huge part of everyday life, i've even lost a friend when he committed suicide after starting to use heroin. The drug dealers literally stand outside of the schools selling their shit.

We should be as hard on them as possible, and continue the war on drugs.

It might be easy to say when you are from a place where you dont even notice drugs, but when you see peoples lives destroyed by it you might change your mind.

Decriminalizing drugs? Worst idea ever.


How about you look at the benefits instead of just going off your emotions? If you really care about people dying from drugs, then you need to read up on the benefits of decriminalization, or legalization. More lives would be saved from having factory produced drugs when compared to the street garbage so many users are subjected to. If junkies want to get high, they'll get high; and I think its better getting it from the government, then some asshole outside of a school. Also, guess what? That asshole wouldn't be making money. Instead, your government could be making money off users, and put that money to good use, like better schools, libraries, hospitals, whatever.

Also, who are you to tell people what they can, and cannot put in their bodies? I think that's very rude and selfish. If you want it banned to prevent more injuries or needless death, then we need to put more effort on education, not the prohibition; seeing as that isn't working at all.

Also, so the person above me, your poll is pretty biased.


I don't think it's rude or selfish to be concerned about substances that can adversely affect peoples' judgment or behavior. I'm sure most people here are sensible enough to realize that there are drugs out there that would not benefit society at all to legalize. Sure, marijuana may be fine as it has relatively low addictive potential, but I can't think of any good reason a drug like heroine or cocaine should be legal, even if it was regulated just because of their destructive nature and high potential for addiction.

The "war on drugs" certainly has taken a huge toll in lives and resources, but it can't simply be stopped because all illicit drugs just don't fall into the same category. To think so is just being ignorant of reality. At best we can try to look for more efficient methods to manage the problem, but it's not a cookie cutter problem and there's certainly no cookie cutter solution.

Also, the "it's my body, I can do what I want" argument is pretty weak because a person who is suffering from impaired judgment presents a potential risk not only to themselves, but also to those around them. The influence of any mind altering substance (yes, even alcohol and prescription drugs) extends beyond the user himself.

We have enough of a problem with people not following regulations when drinking alcohol (such as not drinking and driving). Given our failure to even control alcohol with regulations, what on earth would make anyone think simply regulating currently illicit drugs would encourage people to use them responsibly? And if we can't ensure that, why would we compound the problem of irresponsible behavior by allowing access to more problematic substances?


I agree with most of what you said.

I don't think my argument about it being my body is weak though, I am not mentally disabled, I am an adult, I should be allowed to do substances that I am educated about, and I think the same should apply to everyone under those conditions.

I also agree that regulating drugs wouldn't necessarily enforce users to be responsible, I don't think I said or implied that, maybe someone else did. But thats not the point. You really think people need the government to supply drugs? No. They're going to get them anyway, and most people get them VERY easily. The point of having government regulation is providing a safety standard for producing said substances and hopefully reducing a lot of gang and criminal income. No more ecstasy cut with meth, no more impure heroin, no more laced drugs, no more people selling heroin in schools etc.

That works in theory, but the truth is we also have huge black markets for drugs that are regulated by the government (prescription drugs). This black market doesn't just consist of drugs that were made to standards, but also contains a huge supply of fake generics that are really no different and just as dangerous as unregulated illegal drugs such as cocaine. I think this goes quite a long way to disproving the notion that regulating illicit substances and ensuring quality control would remove the problem of impure products thrown together in someone's backyard. It may reduce the problem somewhat, but so long as the cost or process of acquiring controlled substances remains a prohibiting factor, a black market will always exist.

The argument that anyone that wants illegal drugs could get them is also difficult for me to believe because not everyone knows where to get heroine or even marijuana and the risk of being caught in some sort of sting certainly deters a good number of people from attempting to find out. For some it might not matter one way or the other, but it does give the average person pause as does the lack of reliable quality control. By legalizing these substances, you're increasing their accessibility to people who might otherwise have not had access to them.

I'm not saying that there's no valid argument for legalizing any drug, but I don't think the benefits are really as clear cut as most proponents make them out to be. It's essentially trying to weigh the pros and cons and determine the lesser of two evils. I'm just not convinced...
Morteth
Profile Joined April 2010
United States59 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-31 22:02:10
May 31 2011 21:52 GMT
#143
On June 01 2011 06:40 AMaidensWrath wrote:
World's most senseless war? I highly doubt that.


Senseless? Yes. Worse substances are legal, and the prohibitions on certain substances in the past have proven to proliferate the illegal substances use.

Marijuana's legal status is also neglecting the country and potentially the world of many jobs, an issue you have to weigh out in our current situation.

How much money have we spent on this in the past half century? Is it an efficient system?

Is it the most senseless war? Depends on who you ask, many would say yes. It's just more money down the toilet. And pretty ironic when you see the damage tobacco and alcohol have induced which is why these hard drugs are illegal in the first place.
laste
Profile Joined November 2008
Bulgaria242 Posts
May 31 2011 21:55 GMT
#144
its about changing the way we approach drugs, dangerous substances included. not making heroin legal to buy in the store.

continuing this campaign is counter-productive, it accomplishes nothing other than making people go to jail. these substances are still accessible no matter what you do. in the arab world they have extremely harsh penalties for illegal substance usage yet drugs are still widely used, maybe not as much as in the west but thats perhaps due to their culture.

last year the Czech republic changed its drug policies, you can carry around:

Marijuana: up to 15 grams
Heroin: up to 1.5 grams
Cocaine: up to 1 gram
Methamphetetamine: up to 2 grams
Amphetamine: up to 2 grams
Ecstasy: up to 4 tablets
Hashish: up to 5 grams
Hallucinogenic mushrooms: up to 40 pieces
LSD: up to five tabs

and I don't think much has changed other than less people going to jail.

I believe it has come to the point where the legal status of these substances has become kind of irrelevant. If we'd spend the time, effort and money educating people on why exactly some of this stuff is really bad for you we'd wouldn't have half the trouble with drugs we have today.

You'd think in a modern society people wouldn't idolize Charlie Sheen for "bangin 7gram rocks" but they do because they think its bad-ass. Thats the whole point of this, to change people's attitude.
Everybody will be in bronze soon, because Tasteless will have all our ladder points.
LegendaryZ
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1583 Posts
May 31 2011 22:03 GMT
#145
On June 01 2011 06:38 Insanious wrote:
You do realize that two of the most dangerous drugs are already legalized...

Nicotine is the most addictive substance on earth. It is legalized and in cigarettes. Even drugs like heroine and crack cocaine are less addictive than Nicotine.

Then we get into something that is dangerous, lets talk about alcohol. Easy to overdose on, causes a massive amount of impaired judgment, and is the drug tied to the most deaths annually.

Legalizing and regulating these drugs are similar to the legalization and regulation of alcohol and nicotine.

Not only will legalizing reduce the amount of crime (as it will remove the black market aspect of drugs), but it will make the drugs safer (as in, they will be of a certain purity and will not kill people due to accidental overdoses or being cut with something that shouldn't be ingested.) We also can end up creating business whose jobs are responsible for helping people who are on these drugs. Where you end up with a society that people can do what they want, and can get help when they need it, while being a lot less in danger and having more help available...

Legalization and regulation > making it illegal.


I think I made it a point to include alcohol in my reasoning precisely because it is a dangerous substance in line with many of the drugs that we currently outlaw. However, I don't believe the fact that alcohol is legal should automatically mean we need to legalize more dangerous and abusive substances. If anything, the fact that alcohol is so problematic should be a sign that we need to find a more effective solution for further regulating it rather than adding to society's problems by introducing more risky substances.

I've already explained why I believe that the removal of the black market through legalization is a myth so I won't bother revisiting that topic. If you want to read it, read the post right before this one.

If I believed that people were responsible, I might be more convinced, but I don't because they're clearly not. The trouble with any drug be it alcohol or crack is that once consumed, they impair the judgment of people who might otherwise be perfectly responsible. I wish I could believe that people could be depended on to drink responsibly and moderately. I wish I could believe that a person could be depended on to get high once in a while and not let it become a destructive force in their lives. While I believe many can, I also know that there are many more who simply can't. Sure, you can certainly argue that self destructive behavior exists in many other forms as well, but I really can't justify adding to it, especially when we're dealing with things that can distort perfectly good people and turn them into something they're not.

It's an ugly industry on all sides and one that's taken a horrible toll on humanity, but I would rather continue to encourage people to find alternative methods of escaping stress (more productive ones) than believe that this is an inevitable disease of humanity that can never be cured. Falling back upon our baser instincts and resorting to substance use in order to make ourselves feel better just feels like a step backward for me rather than a step forward... Be it alcohol, nicotine, or whatever.
Deadlyfish
Profile Joined August 2010
Denmark1980 Posts
May 31 2011 22:05 GMT
#146
On June 01 2011 05:43 PanN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2011 05:18 Deadlyfish wrote:
Strongly disagree with this. I've lived in Panama for a long time, where drugs are a huge part of everyday life, i've even lost a friend when he committed suicide after starting to use heroin. The drug dealers literally stand outside of the schools selling their shit.

We should be as hard on them as possible, and continue the war on drugs.

It might be easy to say when you are from a place where you dont even notice drugs, but when you see peoples lives destroyed by it you might change your mind.

Decriminalizing drugs? Worst idea ever.


How about you look at the benefits instead of just going off your emotions? If you really care about people dying from drugs, then you need to read up on the benefits of decriminalization, or legalization. More lives would be saved from having factory produced drugs when compared to the street garbage so many users are subjected to. If junkies want to get high, they'll get high; and I think its better getting it from the government, then some asshole outside of a school. Also, guess what? That asshole wouldn't be making money. Instead, your government could be making money off users, and put that money to good use, like better schools, libraries, hospitals, whatever.

Also, who are you to tell people what they can, and cannot put in their bodies? I think that's very rude and selfish. If you want it banned to prevent more injuries or needless death, then we need to put more effort on education, not the prohibition; seeing as that isn't working at all.

Also, so the person above me, your poll is pretty biased.


Legalizing drugs would send the message to people that it's alright to use drugs. By making it criminal you're sending the message that it's wrong to do, and that would discourage a lot of people. Sure it wouldn't matter to junkies, but some people might start using just because it's legal.

People can do whatever they want to themselves, i dont care. But the fact is that using drugs hurts others. Same reason as why you cant drive while drunk. You can do whatever you want, as long as you dont hurt other people.

I know that legalizing drugs would have its benefits, lower crime, more money for the government etc. but it would also create more drug users, especially in places like central america where drugs are pretty much everywhere.
If wishes were horses we'd be eating steak right now.
Voltaire
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1485 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-31 22:08:33
May 31 2011 22:08 GMT
#147
Signed. It's time for governments to stop wasting billions of dollars on restricting our personal freedoms.
As long as people believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.
ampson
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States2355 Posts
May 31 2011 22:08 GMT
#148
Just a note: I am sick of the "Worse drugs are legal" argument. Would you let a pedophile into your house just because a serial killer is already inside? This argument sounds more like it should be to go back to prohibition than to legalize anything.
gerundium
Profile Joined June 2010
Netherlands786 Posts
May 31 2011 22:11 GMT
#149
Dutch political party had a call for the exact same thing recently from the youth side of the party. Reading articles now, but i am definitely pro this idea.
Grettin
Profile Joined April 2010
42381 Posts
May 31 2011 22:14 GMT
#150
This might have been here already, but:

http://transform-drugs.blogspot.com/2011/05/former-presidents-of-brazil-colombia.html
"If I had force-fields in Brood War, I'd never lose." -Bisu
Krikkitone
Profile Joined April 2009
United States1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-31 22:27:25
May 31 2011 22:23 GMT
#151
On June 01 2011 06:46 LegendaryZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2011 06:32 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 06:00 LegendaryZ wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:43 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:18 Deadlyfish wrote:
Strongly disagree with this. I've lived in Panama for a long time, where drugs are a huge part of everyday life, i've even lost a friend when he committed suicide after starting to use heroin. The drug dealers literally stand outside of the schools selling their shit.

We should be as hard on them as possible, and continue the war on drugs.

It might be easy to say when you are from a place where you dont even notice drugs, but when you see peoples lives destroyed by it you might change your mind.

Decriminalizing drugs? Worst idea ever.


How about you look at the benefits instead of just going off your emotions? If you really care about people dying from drugs, then you need to read up on the benefits of decriminalization, or legalization. More lives would be saved from having factory produced drugs when compared to the street garbage so many users are subjected to. If junkies want to get high, they'll get high; and I think its better getting it from the government, then some asshole outside of a school. Also, guess what? That asshole wouldn't be making money. Instead, your government could be making money off users, and put that money to good use, like better schools, libraries, hospitals, whatever.

Also, who are you to tell people what they can, and cannot put in their bodies? I think that's very rude and selfish. If you want it banned to prevent more injuries or needless death, then we need to put more effort on education, not the prohibition; seeing as that isn't working at all.

Also, so the person above me, your poll is pretty biased.


I don't think it's rude or selfish to be concerned about substances that can adversely affect peoples' judgment or behavior. I'm sure most people here are sensible enough to realize that there are drugs out there that would not benefit society at all to legalize. Sure, marijuana may be fine as it has relatively low addictive potential, but I can't think of any good reason a drug like heroine or cocaine should be legal, even if it was regulated just because of their destructive nature and high potential for addiction.

The "war on drugs" certainly has taken a huge toll in lives and resources, but it can't simply be stopped because all illicit drugs just don't fall into the same category. To think so is just being ignorant of reality. At best we can try to look for more efficient methods to manage the problem, but it's not a cookie cutter problem and there's certainly no cookie cutter solution.

Also, the "it's my body, I can do what I want" argument is pretty weak because a person who is suffering from impaired judgment presents a potential risk not only to themselves, but also to those around them. The influence of any mind altering substance (yes, even alcohol and prescription drugs) extends beyond the user himself.

We have enough of a problem with people not following regulations when drinking alcohol (such as not drinking and driving). Given our failure to even control alcohol with regulations, what on earth would make anyone think simply regulating currently illicit drugs would encourage people to use them responsibly? And if we can't ensure that, why would we compound the problem of irresponsible behavior by allowing access to more problematic substances?


I agree with most of what you said.

I don't think my argument about it being my body is weak though, I am not mentally disabled, I am an adult, I should be allowed to do substances that I am educated about, and I think the same should apply to everyone under those conditions.

I also agree that regulating drugs wouldn't necessarily enforce users to be responsible, I don't think I said or implied that, maybe someone else did. But thats not the point. You really think people need the government to supply drugs? No. They're going to get them anyway, and most people get them VERY easily. The point of having government regulation is providing a safety standard for producing said substances and hopefully reducing a lot of gang and criminal income. No more ecstasy cut with meth, no more impure heroin, no more laced drugs, no more people selling heroin in schools etc.

That works in theory, but the truth is we also have huge black markets for drugs that are regulated by the government (prescription drugs). This black market doesn't just consist of drugs that were made to standards, but also contains a huge supply of fake generics that are really no different and just as dangerous as unregulated illegal drugs such as cocaine. I think this goes quite a long way to disproving the notion that regulating illicit substances and ensuring quality control would remove the problem of impure products thrown together in someone's backyard. It may reduce the problem somewhat, but so long as the cost or process of acquiring controlled substances remains a prohibiting factor, a black market will always exist.

The argument that anyone that wants illegal drugs could get them is also difficult for me to believe because not everyone knows where to get heroine or even marijuana and the risk of being caught in some sort of sting certainly deters a good number of people from attempting to find out. For some it might not matter one way or the other, but it does give the average person pause as does the lack of reliable quality control. By legalizing these substances, you're increasing their accessibility to people who might otherwise have not had access to them.

I'm not saying that there's no valid argument for legalizing any drug, but I don't think the benefits are really as clear cut as most proponents make them out to be. It's essentially trying to weigh the pros and cons and determine the lesser of two evils. I'm just not convinced...



That depends on what you mean by regulated.

Prescription drugs are regulated such that it is illegal to obtain them for Vast # of people.

Alcohol/Tobacco is regulated such that it is illegal for minors/under 21 to obtain them and everyone else can do so legally.

If drugs were legalized for all but minors, then the black market would continue to exist, but it would be significantly smaller.(unlike prescription drugs where the it is illegal for a majority of the pop, so a significant black market exists for that demand)


I agree that alcohol illutrates the danger with both outlawing (gangs during prohibition) and legalizing (Drunk drivers, children that get addicted, etc.)

The issue is the balance between those, and legalizing (particularly with taxation to help pay for the societal costs/regulation of those that dispense it/etc.) may be the better way.
Slithe
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States985 Posts
May 31 2011 22:27 GMT
#152
On June 01 2011 07:05 Deadlyfish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2011 05:43 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:18 Deadlyfish wrote:
Strongly disagree with this. I've lived in Panama for a long time, where drugs are a huge part of everyday life, i've even lost a friend when he committed suicide after starting to use heroin. The drug dealers literally stand outside of the schools selling their shit.

We should be as hard on them as possible, and continue the war on drugs.

It might be easy to say when you are from a place where you dont even notice drugs, but when you see peoples lives destroyed by it you might change your mind.

Decriminalizing drugs? Worst idea ever.


How about you look at the benefits instead of just going off your emotions? If you really care about people dying from drugs, then you need to read up on the benefits of decriminalization, or legalization. More lives would be saved from having factory produced drugs when compared to the street garbage so many users are subjected to. If junkies want to get high, they'll get high; and I think its better getting it from the government, then some asshole outside of a school. Also, guess what? That asshole wouldn't be making money. Instead, your government could be making money off users, and put that money to good use, like better schools, libraries, hospitals, whatever.

Also, who are you to tell people what they can, and cannot put in their bodies? I think that's very rude and selfish. If you want it banned to prevent more injuries or needless death, then we need to put more effort on education, not the prohibition; seeing as that isn't working at all.

Also, so the person above me, your poll is pretty biased.


Legalizing drugs would send the message to people that it's alright to use drugs. By making it criminal you're sending the message that it's wrong to do, and that would discourage a lot of people. Sure it wouldn't matter to junkies, but some people might start using just because it's legal.

People can do whatever they want to themselves, i dont care. But the fact is that using drugs hurts others. Same reason as why you cant drive while drunk. You can do whatever you want, as long as you dont hurt other people.

I know that legalizing drugs would have its benefits, lower crime, more money for the government etc. but it would also create more drug users, especially in places like central america where drugs are pretty much everywhere.


I think it's important for everyone to realize the last sentence in this post. We do all live in very different places, and the policies as such should be catered to be the most effective for a given situation.

If we are talking about a society that already portrays a negative perception of hard drugs, then I believe it is more sensible to decriminalize drug use. Right now, if a drug user gets caught and sent to prison, well that's just going to make the problem worse for him and everyone else once he gets out. That's a waste of time and money on all sides.

A place like Panama sounds like a much trickier affair. However, there's a huge difference between decriminalizing drugs and letting dealers sit outside the school parking lot. I would opt for a softer approach than the heavy handed methods that are commonplace today.
Voltaire
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1485 Posts
May 31 2011 22:27 GMT
#153
On June 01 2011 07:23 Krikkitone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2011 06:46 LegendaryZ wrote:
On June 01 2011 06:32 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 06:00 LegendaryZ wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:43 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:18 Deadlyfish wrote:
Strongly disagree with this. I've lived in Panama for a long time, where drugs are a huge part of everyday life, i've even lost a friend when he committed suicide after starting to use heroin. The drug dealers literally stand outside of the schools selling their shit.

We should be as hard on them as possible, and continue the war on drugs.

It might be easy to say when you are from a place where you dont even notice drugs, but when you see peoples lives destroyed by it you might change your mind.

Decriminalizing drugs? Worst idea ever.


How about you look at the benefits instead of just going off your emotions? If you really care about people dying from drugs, then you need to read up on the benefits of decriminalization, or legalization. More lives would be saved from having factory produced drugs when compared to the street garbage so many users are subjected to. If junkies want to get high, they'll get high; and I think its better getting it from the government, then some asshole outside of a school. Also, guess what? That asshole wouldn't be making money. Instead, your government could be making money off users, and put that money to good use, like better schools, libraries, hospitals, whatever.

Also, who are you to tell people what they can, and cannot put in their bodies? I think that's very rude and selfish. If you want it banned to prevent more injuries or needless death, then we need to put more effort on education, not the prohibition; seeing as that isn't working at all.

Also, so the person above me, your poll is pretty biased.


I don't think it's rude or selfish to be concerned about substances that can adversely affect peoples' judgment or behavior. I'm sure most people here are sensible enough to realize that there are drugs out there that would not benefit society at all to legalize. Sure, marijuana may be fine as it has relatively low addictive potential, but I can't think of any good reason a drug like heroine or cocaine should be legal, even if it was regulated just because of their destructive nature and high potential for addiction.

The "war on drugs" certainly has taken a huge toll in lives and resources, but it can't simply be stopped because all illicit drugs just don't fall into the same category. To think so is just being ignorant of reality. At best we can try to look for more efficient methods to manage the problem, but it's not a cookie cutter problem and there's certainly no cookie cutter solution.

Also, the "it's my body, I can do what I want" argument is pretty weak because a person who is suffering from impaired judgment presents a potential risk not only to themselves, but also to those around them. The influence of any mind altering substance (yes, even alcohol and prescription drugs) extends beyond the user himself.

We have enough of a problem with people not following regulations when drinking alcohol (such as not drinking and driving). Given our failure to even control alcohol with regulations, what on earth would make anyone think simply regulating currently illicit drugs would encourage people to use them responsibly? And if we can't ensure that, why would we compound the problem of irresponsible behavior by allowing access to more problematic substances?


I agree with most of what you said.

I don't think my argument about it being my body is weak though, I am not mentally disabled, I am an adult, I should be allowed to do substances that I am educated about, and I think the same should apply to everyone under those conditions.

I also agree that regulating drugs wouldn't necessarily enforce users to be responsible, I don't think I said or implied that, maybe someone else did. But thats not the point. You really think people need the government to supply drugs? No. They're going to get them anyway, and most people get them VERY easily. The point of having government regulation is providing a safety standard for producing said substances and hopefully reducing a lot of gang and criminal income. No more ecstasy cut with meth, no more impure heroin, no more laced drugs, no more people selling heroin in schools etc.

That works in theory, but the truth is we also have huge black markets for drugs that are regulated by the government (prescription drugs). This black market doesn't just consist of drugs that were made to standards, but also contains a huge supply of fake generics that are really no different and just as dangerous as unregulated illegal drugs such as cocaine. I think this goes quite a long way to disproving the notion that regulating illicit substances and ensuring quality control would remove the problem of impure products thrown together in someone's backyard. It may reduce the problem somewhat, but so long as the cost or process of acquiring controlled substances remains a prohibiting factor, a black market will always exist.

The argument that anyone that wants illegal drugs could get them is also difficult for me to believe because not everyone knows where to get heroine or even marijuana and the risk of being caught in some sort of sting certainly deters a good number of people from attempting to find out. For some it might not matter one way or the other, but it does give the average person pause as does the lack of reliable quality control. By legalizing these substances, you're increasing their accessibility to people who might otherwise have not had access to them.

I'm not saying that there's no valid argument for legalizing any drug, but I don't think the benefits are really as clear cut as most proponents make them out to be. It's essentially trying to weigh the pros and cons and determine the lesser of two evils. I'm just not convinced...



That depends on what you mean by regulated.

Prescription drugs are regulated such that it is illegal to obtain them for Vast # of people.

Alcohol/Tobacco is regulated such that it is illegal for minors/under 21 to obtain them and everyone else can do so legally.

If drugs were legalized for all but minors, then the black market would continue to exist, but it would be significantly smaller.(unlike prescription drugs where the it is illegal for a majority of the pop, so a significant black market exists for that demand)


There isn't really a "black market" per say for alcohol and tobacco for minors; there are just straw purchases. After I turned 18 all of my under 18 friends who smoked cigarettes would always ask me to buy packs for them. (with their money) It works the same with medical marijuana today, people with their cards just buy it for their friends. Some people even charge a fee for this and do it regularly. That is what would happen if all drugs were legalized.
As long as people believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.
Voltaire
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1485 Posts
May 31 2011 22:31 GMT
#154
On June 01 2011 07:27 Slithe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2011 07:05 Deadlyfish wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:43 PanN wrote:
On June 01 2011 05:18 Deadlyfish wrote:
Strongly disagree with this. I've lived in Panama for a long time, where drugs are a huge part of everyday life, i've even lost a friend when he committed suicide after starting to use heroin. The drug dealers literally stand outside of the schools selling their shit.

We should be as hard on them as possible, and continue the war on drugs.

It might be easy to say when you are from a place where you dont even notice drugs, but when you see peoples lives destroyed by it you might change your mind.

Decriminalizing drugs? Worst idea ever.


How about you look at the benefits instead of just going off your emotions? If you really care about people dying from drugs, then you need to read up on the benefits of decriminalization, or legalization. More lives would be saved from having factory produced drugs when compared to the street garbage so many users are subjected to. If junkies want to get high, they'll get high; and I think its better getting it from the government, then some asshole outside of a school. Also, guess what? That asshole wouldn't be making money. Instead, your government could be making money off users, and put that money to good use, like better schools, libraries, hospitals, whatever.

Also, who are you to tell people what they can, and cannot put in their bodies? I think that's very rude and selfish. If you want it banned to prevent more injuries or needless death, then we need to put more effort on education, not the prohibition; seeing as that isn't working at all.

Also, so the person above me, your poll is pretty biased.


Legalizing drugs would send the message to people that it's alright to use drugs. By making it criminal you're sending the message that it's wrong to do, and that would discourage a lot of people. Sure it wouldn't matter to junkies, but some people might start using just because it's legal.

People can do whatever they want to themselves, i dont care. But the fact is that using drugs hurts others. Same reason as why you cant drive while drunk. You can do whatever you want, as long as you dont hurt other people.

I know that legalizing drugs would have its benefits, lower crime, more money for the government etc. but it would also create more drug users, especially in places like central america where drugs are pretty much everywhere.


I think it's important for everyone to realize the last sentence in this post. We do all live in very different places, and the policies as such should be catered to be the most effective for a given situation.

If we are talking about a society that already portrays a negative perception of hard drugs, then I believe it is more sensible to decriminalize drug use. Right now, if a drug user gets caught and sent to prison, well that's just going to make the problem worse for him and everyone else once he gets out. That's a waste of time and money on all sides.

A place like Panama sounds like a much trickier affair. However, there's a huge difference between decriminalizing drugs and letting dealers sit outside the school parking lot. I would opt for a softer approach than the heavy handed methods that are commonplace today.


I don't think legalizing drugs would cause more users in poorer countries. There is little regulation and law enforcement in these countries anyways so legalizing wouldn't have nearly as much as an impact as it would in a first world country. In the first world, I think for the first few years there would be a small percentage in increase of formerly illegal drug usage because the vast majority of people still wouldn't use these drugs even if they were legal.

Anyway, look back to alcohol prohibition and look at where we are now. I honestly think that if drugs were legalized formerly illegal drug use would be lower than it is now within the next 10 years.
As long as people believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.
Mastermind
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Canada7096 Posts
May 31 2011 22:35 GMT
#155
On June 01 2011 07:08 Voltaire wrote:
Signed. It's time for governments to stop wasting billions of dollars on restricting our personal freedoms.

I agree with this man. Signed.
Shvifb
Profile Joined February 2011
12 Posts
May 31 2011 22:39 GMT
#156
Does the answer really have to involve legalization/regulation? I've heard that some Asian countries have extremely tough laws; you get caught there with something and you're facing 5-10 years. And the harsh stance is enough to heavily deter drug usage.
TheFrankOne
Profile Joined December 2010
United States667 Posts
May 31 2011 22:40 GMT
#157
I think a lot of the arguments presented in this thread ignore the treatment of addicts as criminals. The recidivism problems that arise because we have adopted a punishment over treatment approach leave our society with more people trapped in cyclical poverty with debilitating addictions who have no real treatment options from the state.

In countries in Latin America the drug problem is a direct result of the USA's drug problem. We in the US have provided demand for a long time and now that demand is starting to develop to the south, the supply is more than available for users.

The creation of legal, if controlled or limited markets, particularly for marijuana will damage drug cartel's funding and the establishment of available and functional treatment centers is a far more reasonable policy than the utter prohibition of drugs and the imprisoning of users.
Shiragaku
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Hong Kong4308 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-31 23:10:34
May 31 2011 23:06 GMT
#158
Glad to see this going through. But this is sadly not the people getting smarter, it seems to be a new class of people using marijuana. Before the phenomenon with everyone smoking pot, including conservatives, marijuana was smoked by poor druggies and poor immigrants. Of course there were always the rich kids but they were too small to make a difference. And to give another example, in Britain, gin was banned (common drink for the poor and homeless) but whiskey was not (very expensive and fashionable drink), Then we have prohibition which passed in Congress because most of the people who had alcohol issues were immigrants Ireland or Eastern or Southern European nations which were considered scums by the normal US citizen at the time.

Also, most of the Latin America's drug money does not come from marijuana. If I remember correctly from NPR, marijuana now makes up about .3 percent of the drug money because people over time discovered that it is rather easy to grow marijuana inside your own home. Cocaine, heroine, and guns are much more profitable.

Once again, congrats for this finally being considered but I think we can all agree that we should teach kids in health class that marijuana is bad for you and do not help corporations benefit from our death just like we do with cigarettes. Not that it has a major effect seeing how many kids smoke with ALL THE EVIDENCE provided that smoking is bad for you but still.
Slithe
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States985 Posts
May 31 2011 23:08 GMT
#159
On June 01 2011 07:39 Shvifb wrote:
Does the answer really have to involve legalization/regulation? I've heard that some Asian countries have extremely tough laws; you get caught there with something and you're facing 5-10 years. And the harsh stance is enough to heavily deter drug usage.


My problem with this approach is that the sentencing is overly harsh, and you're basically wasting a person's life and wasting money keeping them in prison. You might be achieving better deterrence rate, but you're causing damage elsewhere.
TheFrankOne
Profile Joined December 2010
United States667 Posts
May 31 2011 23:16 GMT
#160
On June 01 2011 08:06 Shiragaku wrote:
Also, most of the Latin America's drug money does not come from marijuana. If I remember correctly from NPR, marijuana now makes up about .3 percent of the drug money because people over time discovered that it is rather easy to grow marijuana inside your own home. Cocaine, heroine, and guns are much more profitable.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/topstories/2008-02-21-2221217072_x.htm
http://tucsoncitizen.com/view-from-baja-arizona/2010/09/05/mexican-marijuana-fuels-drug-cartels/

That is just not true. Marijuana is the largest source of revenue for drug cartels. Please look things up before posting about things you think you heard one time.
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
WardiTV Mondays #70
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
FoxeR 78
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
JulyZerg 448
actioN 436
Shuttle 198
Pusan 59
Mind 50
ZergMaN 47
yabsab 35
NaDa 30
ToSsGirL 30
Bale 19
[ Show more ]
soO 16
Sacsri 15
GoRush 15
Icarus 9
Larva 3
Dota 2
febbydoto60
League of Legends
JimRising 830
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv907
Other Games
summit1g9043
WinterStarcraft411
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick856
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2397
• Rush1554
• Lourlo1272
• HappyZerGling119
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
16h 32m
Wardi Open
1d 4h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-31
HSC XXVIII
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W7
Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.