Very similiar UFO sighting across the world - Page 17

On April 16 2011 20:11 Rumpleforeskin wrote:


I realise that there are (almost certainly) plenty of aliens out there, I'm not denying that. However you are either a liar or a fool when you say you have a physics master degree. You emphasise the word 'theory' showing that you don't understand what the word means in science. A theory isn't a 'best guess' about what we think is going on, it's a comprehensive explanation which may or may not be correct. Gravity is a THEORY, so are atoms, the microbe theory of disease, and electricity. The word theory has no bearing on how accepted the idea is.

Also, "Pass through black holes"? You clearly have no clue what black holes are. They aren't special gateways to other dimensions, they aren't portals and you sure as hell can't go into one without dying when (or rather, before) you hit the singularity. They're simply areas which light can't escape if it enters. Go look up black holes on wikipedia before you post. As I said in my first post (not quoted here, look back one page), simple physics shows that interstellar travel is difficult to the point of impossibility.

Simply saying "Just because we can't imagine it doesn't mean that it can't happen" is a cop out. We may not understand alot about our universe, but this doesn't mean we're ignorant. All our physics, from Newton's gravity to General Relativity to Quantum Mechanics, has no place for interstellar travel.

Your post also said that perhaps their evolution helped them travel between stars. Unless you're suggesting that they are telepathic (in which case I suggest you send yourself to the loony bin Mr Physics Masters) I fail to see how any evolutionary process can prepare them for interstellar travel.

TL;DR, You're a liar when you say you have a Physics Masters, and you don't understand the relevant science.

On April 17 2011 18:38 KillaBeeSting wrote:
The taiwain video looks like a haarp weather machine to me. Lol I could show the whole team liquid site some crazy shit. I have a friend on facebook who predicted the chile, new zealend, and japan earthquake all to the date and hour. Apparently he lives in austalia and has friends who hacked the white house and have information on all the weather machines and man made tragedy's.

So, you're evaluation of the humanities current understanding of the universe, quantum physics, subatomic particles, and relativity is that we have "left a couple of things undiscovered"? I think that is a gross overestimation of what we know.

It is funny that you say that because you seem to have incredible faith in physics.

Do you know the story about how Planck chose to go into Physics even when everyone agreed everything there was to be discovered was already discovered?

humanity is REALLY young in the scheme of things. If we, as a human race, live for a VERY.. VERY long time we will have the technology to travel across universes. I know from even the fucking science channel that scientists are already picking their brains at the subject, bending space and time ETC. With soo much TIME, with the help of evolution (learning to use larger %s of our brain, imagine if every scientist in 2000 years had a greater IQ than Einstein) we will figure these matters out.

Why fly a ship with flashy lights right into metropolitan areas, then never seek to directly communicate?

On April 17 2011 09:34 Ballistixz wrote:do you know what a UFO is?

UFO-unidentified flying object.

a UFO can be anything untill it is identified. a UFO can be a bird. but untill we can confirm that it is infact a bird it is considered a UFO. once we have identified it as a bird then its title will be turned from UFO to bird.

this is what happens when you dont have a open mind like yourself. you automatically classify a "UFO" as a alien from outer space from a unknown galaxy when in reality a UFO is literally just what it means, a UNIDENTIFIED flying object.

so since it is unidentified a UFO can be anything until it is identified. you and people ike you need to stop tossing that term around so incorrectly. a UFO does not automatically mean "alien".



again you are uninformed. if it was a "wierd weather phenomenon" then it would have been IDENTIFIED as such. if it has not been identified then it can literally be anything.

whether or not it is "more likely" is COMPLETELY irrelevant because it can literally be ANYTHING including but NOT limited to aliens.

Right now, I don't know how much money is in my wallet. It could be anything, $100, $5, $1. Knowing that I am a starving college student, certain things are more likely than others. I can't entirely eliminate the possibility that I have $100 in my wallet, or $99, or $98, and so on. (I know I have no coins). So essentially, there are 101 possible amounts of money for me to have, every discrete integer from $0 to $100 inclusive. Just because I have no evidence, does NOT at all mean that there is a 1% chance of $1, 1% for $2, and 1% for $100. It is FAR more likely that I have a small amount of cash. Probably something like 50% $0, 49% $1, and a fraction of a percent for other outcomes. There are other factors that come into probability even if you dont know what they are.

Similarly, there is a light in the sky. It could certainly be aliens, I concede that fact. It could also have 99 possible terrestrial explanations. Just because its possible that its aliens ($100) does not make it likely.

Not knowing how much money I have, I would not act as if I had $100 to spend. Similarly, not knowing what the light in the sky was, I will not act as if its aliens.

On April 17 2011 17:43 EternaL_9 wrote:
I know from even the fucking science channel that scientists are already picking their brains at the subject, bending space and time ETC. With soo much TIME, with the help of evolution (learning to use larger %s of our brain, imagine if every scientist in 2000 years had a greater IQ than Einstein) we will figure these matters out.

I don't know, because it is not true. When Plank "went" into physics there were macroscopic phenomena still unexplained. Google "black body"

Wrong, there was still plenty left, they just thought it was basicly nothing just like some of you think of what we have yet to find out. Also it's a true story you could learn from.

On April 18 2011 01:07 ninazerg wrote:


What Neil Tyson fails to realize is that aliens always paralyze their subjects to keep them under control, so snatching something off a shelf would be impossible.

On April 18 2011 01:16 rubio91 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
This made me laugh. Gravity A and gravity B. "amplifying gravity". He clearly doesn't know what is he talking about. He is mistaking a nuclear force with a gravitational force.

On April 17 2011 19:01 Fontong wrote:
Beyond even the fact that the videos for these things are never nice and in HD with good close-ups, not to mention the usual graininess, it just seems awfully strange that a race so advanced that they could get here from probably minimum halfway across the galaxy would do things like this. Why fly a ship with flashy lights right into metropolitan areas, then never seek to directly communicate?

I suppose it's possible that their supercharged brains have come up with some plan where they inure us to sightings before actually landing and trying to make contact, however, it just seems unlikely. What reason would they have to make contact except to enlighten us, use us for their own entertainment, or just study us; I'm sure we are pretty boring to such an advanced race.


Oh you know that guy too?