• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:25
CEST 14:25
KST 21:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 666 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 8

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
Aquafresh
Profile Joined May 2007
United States824 Posts
August 12 2011 00:53 GMT
#141

First on the list would be a vehicle that's capable of delivering substantial mass to Mars and then returning to Earth. The company's planned Falcon Heavy rocket, the plans for which were unveiled in April, could conceivably carry 12 to 15 metric tons, but "I think you'll probably want a vehicle that can deliver something on the order of 50 metric tons ... in a fully reusable manner," Musk said.


Unfortunately people feel the answer to this problem is a super heavy lift vehicle. I don't know how we became obsessed with massive Ares V style rockets, but congress/NASA seem to feel they are destined to build one. It would be a far more beneficial and worthwhile investment to solve the problems keeping us from building fuel depots and tugs than to design and build a massive rocket that will be obsolete before it gets off the ground. Falcon 9 Heavy is nowhere near the scale of the proposed requirements for super heavies, but I worry that the buzz surrounding it will reignite the desire to build one.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-16 03:24:57
August 16 2011 03:04 GMT
#142
Big news

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
The Dragon spacecraft needs extra electrical power to conduct station operations. That power is provided via two solar arrays, one of which is seen in this image. Photo Credit: SpaceX


In a SpaceX clean room shown above in Hawthorne (Los Angeles) California, technicians prepare the Dragon spacecraft for thermal vacuum chamber testing. The open bays will hold the parachutes. NASA has given us a launch date of Nov 30, 2011 for Falcon 9 Flight 3, which will send a Dragon spacecraft to the International Space Station (ISS) as part of NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program.

Over the last several months, SpaceX has been hard at work preparing for our next flight - a mission designed to demonstrate that a privately-developed space transportation system can deliver cargo to and from the International Space Station (ISS). NASA has given us a Nov. 30, 2011 launch date, which should be followed nine days later by Dragon berthing at the ISS.

NASA has agreed in principle to allow SpaceX to combine all of the tests and demonstration activities that we originally proposed as two separate missions (COTS Demo 2 and COTS Demo 3) into a single mission. Furthermore, SpaceX plans to carry additional payloads aboard the Falcon 9's second stage which will deploy after Dragon separates and is well on its way to the ISS. NASA will grant formal approval for the combined COTS missions pending resolution of any potential risks associated with these secondary payloads. Our team continues to work closely with NASA to resolve all questions and concerns.


This next mission represents a huge milestone not only for SpaceX, but also for NASA and the US space program. When the astronauts stationed on the ISS open the hatch and enter the Dragon spacecraft for the first time, it will mark the beginning of a new era in space travel.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
omisa
Profile Joined January 2011
United States494 Posts
August 16 2011 03:49 GMT
#143
Very exciting! This is awesome news, to see NASA working with SpaceX on manned missions, especially with the impending budget cuts and the demise of the shuttle program.

This also brings some hope to the JWST. Although the Hubble went through many similar set backs including budget cuts and cost overruns, the proposed cutting of funding to the James Webb is a very scary reality we might face in the near future.

$4.5 billion for NASA Science programs, which is $431 million below last year’s level. The bill also terminates funding for the James Webb Space Telescope, which is billions of dollars over budget and plagued by poor management.


Source
\m/
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
August 16 2011 08:08 GMT
#144
Most of the energy of the start is used up to actually get the whole rocket / spaceship moving in the first few seconds. Personally I have always thought it should be cheaper to build something like the steam catapult on an aircraft carrier (although without the super rapid acceleration at the start) OR a carrier plane to give the entire thing the initial acceleration (and maybe a bonus boost for height in the case of a carrier plane. Vertical starts with huge fuel consumption are dangerous and cost inefficient.

So in a sense I am happy for any new approach to the problem of getting people and equipment into space, but I also feel that capsules are not the right way to go. They are the easiest (and maybe the cheapest) way, but we shouldnt go about it the easy way but rather the sustainable long term way. Eventually - if Star Trek is to become true - we will need shuttles to get up there and back down anyways.

I also think that we should stop wasting the energy for moving stuff up there by sending up satellites (or space telescopes) which are designed for a limited lifetime only. Throw away goods arent very intelligent when it comes to long term use of resources and the amount of trash surrounding this planet is potentially dangerous to any manned space missions. Thus we need big and modular platforms for our geostationary satellites and fewer spy and GPS satellites in close orbit.

So I do have a problem with making it cheaper to bring stuff into space, because that will "Walmart" it and eventually make it too dangerous for some things due to the excess of waste up there.
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
Engore
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States1916 Posts
August 16 2011 08:11 GMT
#145
I'm a bit curious as to how a private company like this is funded? Is it based on a contract? I have a hard time figuring out how to make profit from such a large investment that would seem to not have that much commercial use.

Very cool though. Always liked NASA and space travel etc. Hopefully they can take it to a new level soon.
EG | Liquid | Dignitas | FXO | SlayerS | TSL | iS | Fan of pretty much all players ^_^ | SeleCT <3 forever! Axslav <3
L3g3nd_
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand10461 Posts
August 16 2011 08:14 GMT
#146
i feel stuff like out of space travel, and eventually perhaps interaction with other races, is best left regulated and in control of NASA, i would hope if some insane discoverery was made NASA would start up again and take control. would feel safer knowing that an organisation, albiet an american organisation, was behind it not a private company
https://twitter.com/#!/IrisAnother
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 24 2011 15:50 GMT
#147
I'm sure this is putting more pressure on SpaceX to be successful:

An "emergency situation" occurred during today's launch of a robotic Russian resupply ship headed for the International Space Station, preventing the Soyuz rocket from placing the freighter into orbit.


Communications were lost about six minutes into what should have been a nine-minute ascent provided by the three-stage rocket.

The core stage of the Soyuz shut down and separated about five minutes after liftoff, leaving the four-nozzle engine of the upper stage to burn its mixture of kerosene fuel and liquid oxygen for the final boost needed to achieve the proper orbit.

Separation of the Progress 44P was expected at 9:09 a.m. EDT (1309 GMT) to start its two-day automated chase to rendezvous with the station for docking Friday.

Instead, the malfunction sent the rocket falling back to Earth. The Interfax news agency reported the spacecraft re-entered the atmosphere over eastern Russia.


Source

Currently the ISS has about 2-3 months of supplies remaining.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ilovelings
Profile Joined January 2011
Argentina776 Posts
August 24 2011 16:55 GMT
#148
Well, accidents happen. We have not seen private accidents yet because there are little to no private space shuttles.
People is diying.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-24 17:37:19
August 24 2011 17:34 GMT
#149
On August 25 2011 01:55 ilovelings wrote:
Well, accidents happen. We have not seen private accidents yet because there are little to no private space shuttles.


True I simply meant that this is basically a kick in the pants that there needs to be more options to supply the ISS etc. This is about the downtime of the Soyuz launcher, and therefore the Soyuz spacecraft. Keep in mind the astronauts are NOT stranded but they can't be replaced either. Not that they will have to leave as they more than enough supplies.

I can only imagine the heads that will roll in Russia over this especially after the "Era of Reliability" and the "Era of Soyuz" proclamations.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ilovelings
Profile Joined January 2011
Argentina776 Posts
August 24 2011 20:08 GMT
#150
Sometimes mother russia is scary.
People is diying.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 26 2011 17:26 GMT
#151
Just revealed, not sure if it's a response or not.

SpaceX will deliver hundreds of kilograms of cargo for crew supplies when Dragon berths with the Space Station later this year.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
TheNihilist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States178 Posts
August 26 2011 18:12 GMT
#152
On August 25 2011 00:50 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
I'm sure this is putting more pressure on SpaceX to be successful:
Show nested quote +

An "emergency situation" occurred during today's launch of a robotic Russian resupply ship headed for the International Space Station, preventing the Soyuz rocket from placing the freighter into orbit.


Show nested quote +
Communications were lost about six minutes into what should have been a nine-minute ascent provided by the three-stage rocket.

The core stage of the Soyuz shut down and separated about five minutes after liftoff, leaving the four-nozzle engine of the upper stage to burn its mixture of kerosene fuel and liquid oxygen for the final boost needed to achieve the proper orbit.

Separation of the Progress 44P was expected at 9:09 a.m. EDT (1309 GMT) to start its two-day automated chase to rendezvous with the station for docking Friday.

Instead, the malfunction sent the rocket falling back to Earth. The Interfax news agency reported the spacecraft re-entered the atmosphere over eastern Russia.


Source

Currently the ISS has about 2-3 months of supplies remaining.


This is incorrect, actually. ISS currently has the consumables to last until May 2012 due to the upmass brought on board by the last shuttle flight. The largest problem with this failure is that the 3rd stage that failed is the same system that launches the manned Soyuz system. The ISS guys are currently scrambling to figure out a way to ensure the problem is completely resolved before the next Soyuz is scheduled to launch carrying 2 Russians and 1 American.
Asymmetric
Profile Joined June 2011
Scotland1309 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-26 18:41:28
August 26 2011 18:40 GMT
#153
They are the easiest (and maybe the cheapest) way, but we shouldnt go about it the easy way but rather the sustainable long term way. Eventually - if Star Trek is to become true - we will need shuttles to get up there and back down anyways.


Building a shuttle isn't the long term solution. This is.

Space Elevator

Until such time as humanity can muster the resources, manpower, will and technological know how to complete such an undertaking however cheap (relatively) disposable rockets appear to be the logical continuation unless theres some fundamental breakthroughs in physics this century.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-30 02:53:13
August 30 2011 02:52 GMT
#154
LAS CRUCES, NM - For the second consecutive year, Spaceport America has received a federal grant award to help fund new spaceport infrastructure. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grant is worth $249,378 toward the cost of a roll-back vehicle integration building at Spaceport America The FAA announced the Space Transportation Infrastructure Matching (STIM) grant award on Friday, August 26. The matching grant program was created to ensure the resiliency of the space transportation infrastructure in the United States, which will rely more heavily on the commercial sector for future space activity, research and exploration.

"These matching funds from the FAA are crucial for improving our vertical launch capabilities and expanding services for our launch customers," said New Mexico Spaceport Authority (NMSA) Executive Director, Christine Anderson. The roll-back vehicle integration building will be located inside the Vertical Launch Area (VLA) of Spaceport America and will be able to accommodate the larger vehicles that are under development.

"Currently, we can only accommodate vehicles up to approximately 24 feet long and five feet wide," said Anderson. "New vehicles under development are much longer, and some have wings for gliding recovery," explained Anderson. "The new roll-back vehicle integration building will let us handle these new vehicles as they come on line."

The roll-back vehicle integration building is projected to cost $498,756, of which the FAA grant will pay for half.


Source

There is also now serious discussion going on about the ISS being unmanned due to the Soyuz missions being delayed as far as November, the same month as SpaceX plans to to perform it's tests which include berthing and delivering supplies to the space station.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
LaLLsc2
Profile Joined September 2010
United States502 Posts
September 02 2011 07:28 GMT
#155
Don't worry about the imagination of our children, we've always got these wars..

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/06/26/cost-of-air-conditioning-for-u-s-troops-in-mideast-more-than-nasa-budget/

The United States spends $20.2 billion annually on air conditioning for troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan — more than NASA's entire budget, NPR reported.


http://www.npr.org/2011/06/25/137414737/among-the-costs-of-war-20b-in-air-conditioning
Live and Let Live
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16694 Posts
September 02 2011 07:55 GMT
#156
Its been 40 years since NASA has taken a living thing more than 450 KM off the earth's surface. During this time countless promises have been made that NASA will return to the "glory days" of the "Apollo Era".

After listening to these dozens of broken promises, missed timelines, and wasted budget money it is time to conclude that NASA is not capable of anything more than low earth orbit space flights.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 03 2011 22:16 GMT
#157
Blue Origin has suffered a (major?)setback after it's vehicle had to be terminated at 45,000 feet:

[image loading]

Three months ago, we successfully flew our second test vehicle in a short hop mission, and then last week we lost the vehicle during a developmental test at Mach 1.2 and an altitude of 45,000 feet. A flight instability drove an angle of attack that triggered our range safety system to terminate thrust on the vehicle. Not the outcome any of us wanted, but we're signed up for this to be hard, and the Blue Origin team is doing an outstanding job. We're already working on our next development vehicle.


Source

The vehicle became unstable at 45,000 feet (13,700 meters) and ground controllers had to terminate it as a precaution. Additional details about what went wrong were not released.

"Not the outcome any of us wanted, but we're signed up for this to be hard," Bezos wrote in a blog post Friday.

Bezos founded Blue Origin to develop a vertical takeoff and landing rocketship that would fly passengers to suborbital space. It recently won money from NASA to compete to go into orbit as a space taxi now that the space shuttle fleet is retired.


Source

No federal funds have been/were used during the tests.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Gamegene
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States8308 Posts
September 03 2011 22:25 GMT
#158
I'm hoping this is the start to a real space industry IN space.

Resource collection, space tourism on the moon, advanced high orbit habitats, energy collection.

Hoping. I'm also hoping that nobody fucks anything up, since there is plenty o chances for this to end in failure/tragedy.

Throw on your favorite jacket and you're good to roll. Stroll through the trees and let your miseries go.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-04 22:39:31
September 04 2011 22:18 GMT
#159
May 2011 Bigelow Aerospace slide presentation:



The BA-2100 is MASSIVE.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 24 2011 23:27 GMT
#160
SpaceX is building an RLV:

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) proposes to issue an experimental permit to Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) to conduct suborbital launches and landings of the Grasshopper reusable launch vehicle (RLV) at the McGregor, Texas test site. ... The Grasshopper RLV consists of a Falcon 9 Stage 1 tank, a Merlin-1D engine, four steel landing legs, and a steel support structure. Carbon overwrapped pressure vessels (COPVs), which are filled with either nitrogen or helium, are attached to the support structure. The Merlin- 1D engine has a maximum thrust of 122,000 pounds. The overall height of the Grasshopper RLV is 106 feet, and the tank height is 85 feet.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Playoffs Stage
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #136
CranKy Ducklings107
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 524
StarCraft: Brood War
Barracks 3624
actioN 2170
Larva 1236
Hyuk 1048
Mini 995
Stork 567
Soma 505
firebathero 438
TY 267
Pusan 252
[ Show more ]
Last 244
Dewaltoss 144
Hyun 113
JulyZerg 86
ToSsGirL 81
Backho 68
Bonyth 48
Light 23
GoRush 17
Icarus 10
SilentControl 7
Dota 2
Gorgc7870
singsing2843
qojqva842
XcaliburYe285
Fuzer 179
canceldota66
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K18
sgares1
Super Smash Bros
Westballz32
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor182
Other Games
B2W.Neo1567
DeMusliM395
Lowko186
Trikslyr24
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2681
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH258
• sitaska43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1328
• Jankos1255
Upcoming Events
CSO Contender
4h 35m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 35m
Online Event
1d 3h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.