• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:27
CEST 06:27
KST 13:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Server Blocker RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion Help: rep cant save
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 698 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 5

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 248 249 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
Risen
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States7927 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-06 06:30:57
January 06 2011 06:27 GMT
#81
On January 06 2011 12:57 Cloud wrote:
SNIP
Private companies can actually be filled by people that want to do scientific research. They aren't like NASA who is most likely only able to research the stuff the government thinks its good to research.

Oh and the fact that technology is in the hands of the private sector (despite all the government's obstacles) is the only reason the USA is so far ahead of Europe and Japan.


Ok 999 here we go...

You're so damn off it hurts me. Why do you comment on things you know NOTHING about? Have you ever asked for funding from NASA? I have, guess what they did? They funded me. Did I have to jump through some bureaucratic red tape? Yes, but not that much. For the most part NASA is only interested in it as long as you can prove there is a practical application for your research (and that such a project is feasible)

The US is so far ahead BECAUSE of our GOVERNMENT investing in private companies and independent researchers (not so common)

Edit: I hope editing doesn't count towards post count...

Who the hell did you think was funding the majority of our basic research?
Pufftrees Everyday>its like a rifter that just used X-Factor/Liquid'Nony: I hope no one lip read XD/Holyflare>it's like policy lynching but better/Resident Los Angeles bachelor
Krikkitone
Profile Joined April 2009
United States1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-06 07:28:14
January 06 2011 07:27 GMT
#82
In any case, NASA should keep funding basic research by scientists...
but Private companies should start providing the rockets to put NASA funded-probes into space
Private companies should start providing the rockets to put satellites for other private companies into space
and Private companies should be providing other services into space that the gov./individuals contract for.

NASA can also regulate just like the FAA does.. crashes still happen, but they are safe enough for most people... space travel will probably be safer than auto travel eventually
xarthaz
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1704 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-06 08:33:28
January 06 2011 08:23 GMT
#83
On January 01 2011 10:08 mahnini wrote:
i can only imagine private contracts to be a bad thing. imagine if something goes wrong during a mission, when stuff is being sourced in house the engineer who built or designed whatever went wrong is a phone call away or probably on stand by. what happens when something goes wrong with a privately sourced component or two privately sourced components fail synchronously?
Uhh.. the NASA (and all government agencies in general) ALREADY use private contractors for pretty much everything.. bureaucratic management is way too bloated to do stuff like that. Even in the military, Blackwater boys do a clean sweep while army/marines bludgeon under bureaucratic compliance.

On January 06 2011 15:27 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2011 12:57 Cloud wrote:
SNIP
Private companies can actually be filled by people that want to do scientific research. They aren't like NASA who is most likely only able to research the stuff the government thinks its good to research.

Oh and the fact that technology is in the hands of the private sector (despite all the government's obstacles) is the only reason the USA is so far ahead of Europe and Japan.


Ok 999 here we go...

You're so damn off it hurts me. Why do you comment on things you know NOTHING about? Have you ever asked for funding from NASA? I have, guess what they did? They funded me. Did I have to jump through some bureaucratic red tape? Yes, but not that much. For the most part NASA is only interested in it as long as you can prove there is a practical application for your research (and that such a project is feasible)

The US is so far ahead BECAUSE of our GOVERNMENT investing in private companies and independent researchers (not so common)

Edit: I hope editing doesn't count towards post count...

Who the hell did you think was funding the majority of our basic research?
What do you think
"practical application" means? Because if it means investment towards the end of producing profitable goods for revenue from consumers, government "science" has little to do with it(because bureaucratic management rejects profitability as a premise, its premise is instead compliance with political objectives). And if you mean something else by "practical application", then it struggles from the problem of economic calculation and hence cant be produced according to the preferences of consumers. In either case: consumers lose, govt and govt contractors like you win.
Aah thats the stuff..
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 11 2011 22:32 GMT
#84
Another score for the Privatization of the Space Industry?


WASHINGTON — NASA told U.S. lawmakers Jan. 10 it intends to build a heavy-lift rocket that incorporates the space shuttle’s main engines, giant external tank and taller versions of the solid-rocket boosters it jettisons on the way to orbit, according to a senior NASA official. However, neither the rocket nor the crew vehicle it would launch could be completed within the cost and schedule Congress outlined for the project late last year.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
January 15 2011 03:09 GMT
#85
NASA's SDLV sounds A LOT like the DIRECT launcher ... just a lot more expensive and seemingly at a much longer timeline. Whats worse is that they still refuse to give any acknowledgement/credit to the name and people behind DIRECT
starleague forever
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-17 23:00:10
January 17 2011 22:48 GMT
#86
Heft Lies and Videotape

[image loading]


"So as Oliver Hardy would say, here's another fine mess we've gotten ourselves into. NASA creates an unaffordable architecture (ESAS) to implement the VSE. The response by the new administration is to cancel the VSE and replace it with promises of more distant goals at some nebulous time in the far future. Congress directs the agency to build an HLV anyway, but the vehicle has no mission, so they pull out the specs of the last HLV America flew. NASA responds by saying they can't do it on the money and schedule specified, even though they themselves have in hand a report that shows how it can be done. Moreover, the agency still claims it doesn't know why anyone would want to go to the Moon, despite having been shown repeatedly that what we do there will create new space faring capability."



Keith's note: During its recent deliberations the HEFT II activity look at a variety of scenarios, reference missions etc. One of them, DM1, actually meets the costs and schedule specified by Congress. DM1 entails creation and use of an in-space propellant depot and refueling capability. It also makes use of EELVs and other commercial launch assets. But forces within NASA ESMD personnel - led by Doug Cooke - have purposefully sat on such ideas and have made certain that they were scrubbed from presentation charts and reports to Congress and other "stakeholders". Charlie Bolden is aware of this tactic.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
January 17 2011 22:53 GMT
#87
People don't care about science and it's so sad =(
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 17 2011 23:06 GMT
#88
Also SpaceX has met all of it's milestones so far:


Hawthorne-based rocket venture Space Exploration Technologies Corp. has received $25 million from NASA since successfully launching its 18-story Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon space capsule from Cape Canaveral last month.

The company, better known as SpaceX, has developed the Dragon capsule under NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program. The spacecraft, which can carry as many as seven astronauts, is considered a contender for the multibillion-dollar job of ferrying crews to and from the International Space Station after the space shuttle is retired this year.

SpaceX already has a $1.6-billion contract with NASA to have the Dragon capsule transport cargo to the space station, a job that could start this year.

Alan Lindenmoyer, manager of the NASA program, confirmed in an interview that the space agency has paid the company for reaching a series of important milestones.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
lu_cid
Profile Joined April 2008
United States428 Posts
January 17 2011 23:08 GMT
#89
From what I've heard from my uncle who is a senior engineer for Aerojet (big manufacturer of rocket motors), NASA is too bogged down by bureaucracy to actually get anything done. Short of some kind of serious reform, the future is private.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 02 2011 07:18 GMT
#90
SpaceX will be holding a press conference on Tuesday to discuss it's latest venture:



From SpaceX' YouTube page.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Risen
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States7927 Posts
April 02 2011 07:41 GMT
#91
I'm so excited! :D
Pufftrees Everyday>its like a rifter that just used X-Factor/Liquid'Nony: I hope no one lip read XD/Holyflare>it's like policy lynching but better/Resident Los Angeles bachelor
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 05 2011 20:21 GMT
#92
Today, Elon Musk, CEO and chief rocket designer of Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) unveiled the dramatic final specifications and launch date for the Falcon Heavy, the world's largest rocket. "Falcon Heavy will carry more payload to orbit or escape velocity than any vehicle in history, apart from the Saturn V moon rocket, which was decommissioned after the Apollo program. This opens a new world of capability for both government and commercial space missions," Musk told a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

"Falcon Heavy will arrive at our Vandenberg, California, launch complex by the end of next year, with liftoff to follow soon thereafter. First launch from our Cape Canaveral launch complex is planned for late 2013 or 2014."

Musk added that with the ability to carry satellites or interplanetary spacecraft weighing over 53 metric tons or 117,000 pounds to orbit, Falcon Heavy will have more than twice the performance of the Space Shuttle or Delta IV Heavy, the next most powerful vehicle, which is operated by United Launch Alliance, a Boeing-Lockheed Martin joint venture.

53 metric tons is more than the maximum take-off weight of a fully-loaded Boeing 737-200 with 136 passengers. In other words, Falcon Heavy can deliver the equivalent of an entire commercial airplane full of passengers, crew, luggage and fuel all the way to orbit.


The 2012 budget for four Air Force launches is $1.74B, which is an average of $435M per launch. Falcon 9 is offered on the commercial market for $50-60M and Falcon Heavy is offered for $80-$125M. Unlike our competitors, this price includes all non-recurring development costs and on-orbit delivery of an agreed upon mission. For government missions, NASA has added mission assurance and additional services to the Falcon 9 for less than $20M.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 24 2011 06:22 GMT
#93
SpaceX once again seems to take the initiative, meanwhile NASA is still arguing about budgets:

"We'll probably put a first man in space in about three years," Elon Musk told the Wall Street Journal Saturday. "We're going all the way to Mars, I think... best case 10 years, worst case 15 to 20 years."

SpaceX is one of the two leading private space companies in the United States and has won $75 million from the US space agency NASA to help its pursuit of developing a spacecraft to replace the space shuttle.

The California-based company last year completed its first successful test of an unmanned space capsule into orbit and back.

"Our goal is to facilitate the transfer of people and cargo to other planets, and then it will be up to people if they want to go," said Musk, who also runs the Tesla company which develops electric cars.

The US space shuttle program is winding down later this year with final flights of Endeavour set for next week and Atlantis in June, ending an era of American spaceflight that began with the first space shuttle mission in 1981.

When the shuttle program ends, the United States hopes private industry will be able to fill the gap by creating the next generation of spacecraft to transport astronauts into space.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Wegandi
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2455 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-24 08:03:06
April 24 2011 08:02 GMT
#94
On January 06 2011 15:27 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2011 12:57 Cloud wrote:
SNIP
Private companies can actually be filled by people that want to do scientific research. They aren't like NASA who is most likely only able to research the stuff the government thinks its good to research.

Oh and the fact that technology is in the hands of the private sector (despite all the government's obstacles) is the only reason the USA is so far ahead of Europe and Japan.


Ok 999 here we go...

You're so damn off it hurts me. Why do you comment on things you know NOTHING about? Have you ever asked for funding from NASA? I have, guess what they did? They funded me. Did I have to jump through some bureaucratic red tape? Yes, but not that much. For the most part NASA is only interested in it as long as you can prove there is a practical application for your research (and that such a project is feasible)

The US is so far ahead BECAUSE of our GOVERNMENT investing in private companies and independent researchers (not so common)

Edit: I hope editing doesn't count towards post count...

Who the hell did you think was funding the majority of our basic research?


I guess Eli Whitney, Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, & Benjamin Franklin were all Government-researchers paid with by tax-money? Most of the inventions and scientific advancement came about through individual effort and private funding. Chicago, New York, Baltimore, San Francisco, St. Louis, etc. entirely built from private investors (aka market). How on Earth did we have an Industrial Revolution when Government spending was .5% of GDP and there were no grants, very little internal taxes, and little to no regulation?

Government takes money out of the private sector through taxation -- and then gives it away to interest groups who will vote for them. It is bribing the public with the publics money.

I'm interested to see what SpaceX can bring to the table. I would pay 500$ to travel to outer-space. :p
Thank you bureaucrats for all your hard work, your commitment to public service and public good is essential to the lives of so many. Also, for Pete's sake can we please get some gun control already, no need for hand guns and assault rifles for the public
Bosu
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States3247 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-24 08:20:45
April 24 2011 08:20 GMT
#95


I'm interested to see what SpaceX can bring to the table. I would pay 500$ to travel to outer-space. :p




500$? Shooting a bit low I think there bud.
#1 Kwanro Fan
Endymion
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States3701 Posts
April 24 2011 08:24 GMT
#96
On April 24 2011 17:20 Bosu wrote:
Show nested quote +


I'm interested to see what SpaceX can bring to the table. I would pay 500$ to travel to outer-space. :p




500$? Shooting a bit low I think there bud.


Hmm I think 500 increased by a factor of 5000 would be a bit more accurate, but dreaming is half the battle!
Have you considered the MMO-Champion forum? You are just as irrational and delusional with the right portion of nostalgic populism. By the way: The old Brood War was absolutely unplayable
chickenhawk
Profile Joined February 2011
Portugal339 Posts
April 24 2011 08:40 GMT
#97
Space should be public domain not private. But I am european, he have a different view of private vs public.
Alethios
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
New Zealand2765 Posts
April 24 2011 08:47 GMT
#98
Hey thanks for all the updates StealthBlue.

Just caught with whats been going on, and my excitement levels are pretty high to say the least. Could we actually see a human on Mars within our lifetime? Further space exploration and development is long past due.
When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive - to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love.
Suisen
Profile Joined April 2011
256 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-24 09:01:44
April 24 2011 08:54 GMT
#99
NASA is confused. And until they and US congress realize public funded human space flight is nonsense, they will stay.

Problem is, they still have the ISS there and they have it there to do science and it would be a waste to not use it not that it is there.

Of course tourists will be the first on Mars and of course it will be the private sector. Who else?


NASA is wasting a lot of resources in answering real questions rather that facilitating tourism for a very select few.
We want to know if there is other life out there. Well, is SpaceX going to buy a space telescope? No. Why not. The answer to that question is not worth any money.
Same with measuring gravity waves and any other space instrument. And we still want to send robots to all the planets, right?

NASA is building the James Webb Space telescope right now. It is vastly delayed and way over budget. It is devouring the whole NASA science budget. People fear it will be canceled and then nothing is left.


Remember the US particle collider in Texas? Congress held a hearing on it because it cost 11 billion dollar and they had just approved of 11 billion dollar for the ISS. So one guy asked: "Will you find god with that machine." The physicist answered "We will find another subatomic particle."

So they canceled the project halfway. They had dug a 1 billion dollar hole which they filled using another 1 billion dollar. It saved them 10 billion dollars of taxpayer money. In the mean time ISS is a white elephant and the real science is being done by the far smaller LHC in Geneve.


The day a human walks on Mars I will probably not be happy. We will have a couple of suberbillionares all give for example SpaceX a billion euro. Then one of them will be drawn out to actually be the first one to go. It will be a sickening waste of money and resources.
In that case let's hope it is a one way trip. Will reduce the costs by at least 66% and we'll get rid of one more of those wasteful superbillionares as they don't contribute to society, to put it mildly.

If robots, no matter how advanced won't suffice, and if it is really that important to see Mars with human eyes, send them in a glass jar.

xarthaz
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1704 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-24 10:22:28
April 24 2011 10:20 GMT
#100
On January 01 2011 10:08 mahnini wrote:
i can only imagine private contracts to be a bad thing. imagine if something goes wrong during a mission, when stuff is being sourced in house the engineer who built or designed whatever went wrong is a phone call away or probably on stand by. what happens when something goes wrong with a privately sourced component or two privately sourced components fail synchronously?
What youre talking about is exactly the LACK OF PRIVATE SECTOR, the lack of private liability and property rights establishment. Your argument is against the PUBLIC sector.
On January 06 2011 15:27 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2011 12:57 Cloud wrote:
SNIP
Private companies can actually be filled by people that want to do scientific research. They aren't like NASA who is most likely only able to research the stuff the government thinks its good to research.

Oh and the fact that technology is in the hands of the private sector (despite all the government's obstacles) is the only reason the USA is so far ahead of Europe and Japan.


Ok 999 here we go...

You're so damn off it hurts me. Why do you comment on things you know NOTHING about? Have you ever asked for funding from NASA? I have, guess what they did? They funded me. Did I have to jump through some bureaucratic red tape? Yes, but not that much. For the most part NASA is only interested in it as long as you can prove there is a practical application for your research (and that such a project is feasible)

The US is so far ahead BECAUSE of our GOVERNMENT investing in private companies and independent researchers (not so common)

Edit: I hope editing doesn't count towards post count...

Who the hell did you think was funding the majority of our basic research?
The test of usefulness is profitability. If a project isnt profitable, no one is demonstrating their preference of it over the money they could use elsewhere. Public finance doesnt fill this criterion, private finance does. Hence it is only private finance that is capable of demonstrably bringing about economic advancement.
Aah thats the stuff..
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 248 249 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
Jumy vs NicoractLIVE!
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
SEL S2 Last Chance Qualifier 1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 288
CosmosSc2 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 315
Bale 13
Icarus 10
LuMiX 1
Dota 2
monkeys_forever931
NeuroSwarm109
League of Legends
JimRising 789
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1075
Other Games
summit1g12140
shahzam1136
ViBE213
RuFF_SC286
Trikslyr31
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2296
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH261
• Hupsaiya 57
• practicex 47
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1436
• Lourlo992
• Stunt374
Other Games
• Scarra1883
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
7h 33m
Big Brain Bouts
11h 33m
sebesdes vs SpeCial
Harstem vs YoungYakov
GgMaChine vs uThermal
CranKy Ducklings
1d 5h
Epic.LAN
1d 7h
CSO Contender
1d 12h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 13h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
4 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
[ Show More ]
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.