• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:13
CEST 09:13
KST 16:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall11HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL76
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 673 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 3

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 248 249 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
TheNihilist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States178 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-01 20:10:17
January 01 2011 19:59 GMT
#41
On January 01 2011 12:13 Aquafresh wrote:
I think the author of the article is not understanding what is happening here. No one in charge is advocating for the private sector to replace NASA, that isn't what this is about. The private sector is designing rockets to earn contracts to do things that NASA has been doing quite badly for ages. For instance the shuttle, which costs about 500 million per launch, is basically only used to service the ISS and run LEO experiments. Mission costs and maintenance of the Shuttle alone have basically tied the US manned space program to LEO since the 70s due the insane recurring costs. Why should NASA have to blow its manned space budget on maintaining 40 year old equipment when there is a whole industry worth of private space companies that are vying for the contract to resupply the ISS and ferry Astronauts to LEO? They are willing to do it for 57 million, using superior, safer, technology. NASA isn't going to go away once these contracts are awarded, unless think going to LEO and back is all NASA is capable of. Once these thing are shifted on to private space NASA will be free to use its increased budget to develop new technologies, and tackle projects that it had its eyes set on decades ago, but never got the funding for (due to the shuttle.)

The new role of NASA will almost exclusively be to explore space, develop new technologies such as advanced propulsion, and open up new fields. The routine things like sending Astronauts to LEO and servicing the ISS will be contracted out to private companies such as SpaceX. For this to work private space is the key. Currently the ISS contract is the main incentive for private companies to spend their money, shortly space tourism will take off and that will be a major incentive as well. With a healthy private space industry NASA can shift a lot of the burden of getting back and forth to orbit to them and will be freed up to tackle more scientifically worthy projects.


The Space Shuttle is a proven, man-rated vehicle that moves 25,000kg and seven astronauts to orbit.

The Falcon 9 is not man-rated, and frankly, entirely unproven at this point. Remember, the space shuttle was advertised as being much, much cheaper than it's operational cost proved it to be, and I suspect the same will be true for SpaceX's Falcon 9.

Edit: Another thing to note is that you are comparing the full operating cost of the Shuttle program to the cost of the SpaceX's vehicle alone, not taking into account any of the operating costs that such a program would entail.
Gelare
Profile Joined July 2010
10 Posts
January 01 2011 20:45 GMT
#42
Why on earth (or off it) is this NASA vs. the private sector? Why can't it be NASA and the private sector? The private sector is great at a lot of things, so let them bid for contracts, and leave the highly exploratory, cutting-edge stuff to NASA.
BroboCop
Profile Joined December 2010
United States373 Posts
January 01 2011 21:39 GMT
#43
On January 02 2011 05:45 Gelare wrote:
Why on earth (or off it) is this NASA vs. the private sector? Why can't it be NASA and the private sector? The private sector is great at a lot of things, so let them bid for contracts, and leave the highly exploratory, cutting-edge stuff to NASA.

it really isnt vs.
it is like that, nasa contracts ppl
the private sector is great at everything b/c ppl want to make money. that makes ppl be great.
they do bid on contracts see orion capsule(which lockheed is making for nasa aka contracteD)
nasa alrdy does that shit.
Aquafresh
Profile Joined May 2007
United States824 Posts
January 02 2011 00:36 GMT
#44
On January 02 2011 04:59 TheNihilist wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 01 2011 12:13 Aquafresh wrote:
I think the author of the article is not understanding what is happening here. No one in charge is advocating for the private sector to replace NASA, that isn't what this is about. The private sector is designing rockets to earn contracts to do things that NASA has been doing quite badly for ages. For instance the shuttle, which costs about 500 million per launch, is basically only used to service the ISS and run LEO experiments. Mission costs and maintenance of the Shuttle alone have basically tied the US manned space program to LEO since the 70s due the insane recurring costs. Why should NASA have to blow its manned space budget on maintaining 40 year old equipment when there is a whole industry worth of private space companies that are vying for the contract to resupply the ISS and ferry Astronauts to LEO? They are willing to do it for 57 million, using superior, safer, technology. NASA isn't going to go away once these contracts are awarded, unless think going to LEO and back is all NASA is capable of. Once these thing are shifted on to private space NASA will be free to use its increased budget to develop new technologies, and tackle projects that it had its eyes set on decades ago, but never got the funding for (due to the shuttle.)

The new role of NASA will almost exclusively be to explore space, develop new technologies such as advanced propulsion, and open up new fields. The routine things like sending Astronauts to LEO and servicing the ISS will be contracted out to private companies such as SpaceX. For this to work private space is the key. Currently the ISS contract is the main incentive for private companies to spend their money, shortly space tourism will take off and that will be a major incentive as well. With a healthy private space industry NASA can shift a lot of the burden of getting back and forth to orbit to them and will be freed up to tackle more scientifically worthy projects.


The Space Shuttle is a proven, man-rated vehicle that moves 25,000kg and seven astronauts to orbit.

The Falcon 9 is not man-rated, and frankly, entirely unproven at this point. Remember, the space shuttle was advertised as being much, much cheaper than it's operational cost proved it to be, and I suspect the same will be true for SpaceX's Falcon 9.

Edit: Another thing to note is that you are comparing the full operating cost of the Shuttle program to the cost of the SpaceX's vehicle alone, not taking into account any of the operating costs that such a program would entail.


Where do you get the idea that I am not taking into account operating costs? I specifically left those out when I named a price for the shuttle to get the most pie in the sky optimistic price possible. It's really closer to 1.5 billion per launch in reality. The price of the COTS contract to resupply the ISS is already locked in at 1.6 billion for 12 flights, and commercial flights have been sold at 57 million for awhile now. Prices will definitely go up, no one denies this, but they won't even scratch the cost of the shuttle, and if they go up too high the competition between Boeing, Orbital, and LMart will surely drive them back down as they will all have viable launch vehicles at similar prices.

The man rating is barely an issue, as the contract is for cargo. No one expects to be able to send astronauts anywhere on it for a few years anyway. Falcon9 was designed to be human rated from the start, Dragon is a bigger issue there, Atlas V is basically human rated already. Either way we will have multiple human rated launchers by 2015, which was the most optimistic Ares/Orion completion date.

On January 02 2011 05:45 Gelare wrote:
Why on earth (or off it) is this NASA vs. the private sector? Why can't it be NASA and the private sector? The private sector is great at a lot of things, so let them bid for contracts, and leave the highly exploratory, cutting-edge stuff to NASA.


You are right. NASA will not be competing with the private sector on this. They have no plans as of now to build a similar LV or space craft, and no one seriously competes with NASA for the more cutting edge stuff as you put it.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-02 01:10:59
January 02 2011 00:47 GMT
#45
The Dragon has Cargo and Crew configurations I believe it was Musk who said it would be an additional escape option which the Shuttle did not have. So SpaceX taking astronauts into Space isn't to far fetched.

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
TheNihilist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States178 Posts
January 02 2011 01:44 GMT
#46
On January 02 2011 09:36 Aquafresh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 02 2011 04:59 TheNihilist wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 01 2011 12:13 Aquafresh wrote:
I think the author of the article is not understanding what is happening here. No one in charge is advocating for the private sector to replace NASA, that isn't what this is about. The private sector is designing rockets to earn contracts to do things that NASA has been doing quite badly for ages. For instance the shuttle, which costs about 500 million per launch, is basically only used to service the ISS and run LEO experiments. Mission costs and maintenance of the Shuttle alone have basically tied the US manned space program to LEO since the 70s due the insane recurring costs. Why should NASA have to blow its manned space budget on maintaining 40 year old equipment when there is a whole industry worth of private space companies that are vying for the contract to resupply the ISS and ferry Astronauts to LEO? They are willing to do it for 57 million, using superior, safer, technology. NASA isn't going to go away once these contracts are awarded, unless think going to LEO and back is all NASA is capable of. Once these thing are shifted on to private space NASA will be free to use its increased budget to develop new technologies, and tackle projects that it had its eyes set on decades ago, but never got the funding for (due to the shuttle.)

The new role of NASA will almost exclusively be to explore space, develop new technologies such as advanced propulsion, and open up new fields. The routine things like sending Astronauts to LEO and servicing the ISS will be contracted out to private companies such as SpaceX. For this to work private space is the key. Currently the ISS contract is the main incentive for private companies to spend their money, shortly space tourism will take off and that will be a major incentive as well. With a healthy private space industry NASA can shift a lot of the burden of getting back and forth to orbit to them and will be freed up to tackle more scientifically worthy projects.


The Space Shuttle is a proven, man-rated vehicle that moves 25,000kg and seven astronauts to orbit.

The Falcon 9 is not man-rated, and frankly, entirely unproven at this point. Remember, the space shuttle was advertised as being much, much cheaper than it's operational cost proved it to be, and I suspect the same will be true for SpaceX's Falcon 9.

Edit: Another thing to note is that you are comparing the full operating cost of the Shuttle program to the cost of the SpaceX's vehicle alone, not taking into account any of the operating costs that such a program would entail.


Where do you get the idea that I am not taking into account operating costs? I specifically left those out when I named a price for the shuttle to get the most pie in the sky optimistic price possible. It's really closer to 1.5 billion per launch in reality. The price of the COTS contract to resupply the ISS is already locked in at 1.6 billion for 12 flights, and commercial flights have been sold at 57 million for awhile now. Prices will definitely go up, no one denies this, but they won't even scratch the cost of the shuttle, and if they go up too high the competition between Boeing, Orbital, and LMart will surely drive them back down as they will all have viable launch vehicles at similar prices.

The man rating is barely an issue, as the contract is for cargo. No one expects to be able to send astronauts anywhere on it for a few years anyway. Falcon9 was designed to be human rated from the start, Dragon is a bigger issue there, Atlas V is basically human rated already. Either way we will have multiple human rated launchers by 2015, which was the most optimistic Ares/Orion completion date.


I stand corrected on the operation costs, I thought you were using the Shuttle program total expenses/launches for the $500 million figure.

I don't see the cargo contract as relevant to the discussion. Commercial cargo is not a new thing, Musk's attempt at commercial crew is the real news and my point is that no man-rated Falcon 9 will be ever launching at a cost anywhere close to $57 million a vehicle.
Liberty7
Profile Joined October 2010
United States36 Posts
January 02 2011 02:22 GMT
#47
On January 02 2011 05:45 Gelare wrote:
Why on earth (or off it) is this NASA vs. the private sector? Why can't it be NASA and the private sector? The private sector is great at a lot of things, so let them bid for contracts, and leave the highly exploratory, cutting-edge stuff to NASA.


Just when have you seen the government do anything "cutting edge"? Besides, it's not the government's role to spend tax money on these things. We're rapidly approaching a time in which each of us will require a government certified employee to wipe our ass for us because "the private sector surely doesn't know how to".

Burt Rutan rocks!
"Pride is the recognition that you are your own highest value" -- Ayn Rand
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15664 Posts
January 02 2011 02:27 GMT
#48
On January 02 2011 11:22 Liberty7 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 02 2011 05:45 Gelare wrote:
Why on earth (or off it) is this NASA vs. the private sector? Why can't it be NASA and the private sector? The private sector is great at a lot of things, so let them bid for contracts, and leave the highly exploratory, cutting-edge stuff to NASA.


Just when have you seen the government do anything "cutting edge"?


Oh, I don't know. Maybe getting into space.
Aquafresh
Profile Joined May 2007
United States824 Posts
January 03 2011 02:07 GMT
#49
On January 02 2011 10:44 TheNihilist wrote:
I don't see the cargo contract as relevant to the discussion. Commercial cargo is not a new thing, Musk's attempt at commercial crew is the real news and my point is that no man-rated Falcon 9 will be ever launching at a cost anywhere close to $57 million a vehicle.


No the cargo contract (COTS) is pretty much the whole thing. No private company has done this before, and SpaceX will be sustaining themselves by launching telecom satellites, NASA ISS cargo, and whatever the DoD sends up there. Atlas V, Delta IV and all the other launchers the US currently uses had there development contracted and paid for almost entirely by government funding through cost plus contracts. This is not a bad thing, and those are certainly successful lauchers, but this is the first time a private company has broken into the launcher business on (mostly) its own means. That is what the big deal about SpaceX is, a human rated Falcon9 + Dragon crew configuration is just icing on the cake. Elon Musk doesn't even expect SpaceX to seriously compete for the contract to send humans to the ISS (CCDEV), he has just claimed in the past that they could get it done by 2013 if things go well, which will (hopefully) make SpaceX one of many ways to get to LEO cheaply.

Also I think you are confusing the pricing. The Falcon9 is just the launcher, the Dragon is the intended cargo, but it could also launch Boeing's CST-100, or any other compatible spacecraft. Human rating it includes modifications to the launch pad and additional health monitoring systems which should not increase the cost too much if history is anything to go by. The main concern isn't even really the cost, but the performance (and by extension cost per kg to LEO) hit when the weight of a launch escape system is added. It will be far less expensive, as well as safer than the shuttle, this is not really even a question. The difference in price won't be because of some magical unproven technology, it will be because we will no longer be using legacy technology and legacy parts from contractors that seek to make legacy profits.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 04 2011 22:40 GMT
#50

The Commercial Crew Transportation System (CCTS) Certification Requirements Document is a consolidated set of technical requirements, standards, and processes built upon the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) vast human spaceflight knowledge and experience. The intent of this document is to define the requirements, standards, and certification package contents that will be used to certify a CCTS to carry NASA crewmembers on Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Missions.


I wonder what SpaceX's reply will/was and what changes would need to be done.

Source

Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
reg
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States134 Posts
January 04 2011 22:49 GMT
#51
On January 01 2011 09:51 On_Slaught wrote:
The private sector cuts corners like mad whenever they can. Keep them out of space exploration please.


Uh, no. Its the government that hires the lowest bidder. People who don't understand how the world works shouldn't comment on it.
Nizaris
Profile Joined May 2010
Belgium2230 Posts
January 04 2011 22:54 GMT
#52
On January 02 2011 11:27 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 02 2011 11:22 Liberty7 wrote:
On January 02 2011 05:45 Gelare wrote:
Why on earth (or off it) is this NASA vs. the private sector? Why can't it be NASA and the private sector? The private sector is great at a lot of things, so let them bid for contracts, and leave the highly exploratory, cutting-edge stuff to NASA.


Just when have you seen the government do anything "cutting edge"?


Oh, I don't know. Maybe getting into space.

thx for proving his point, they stopped behing "cutting edge" some 40y ago.
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
January 04 2011 23:03 GMT
#53
Flying a long burn explosion into a vaccuum that is hundreds of degrees below zero makes me really enjoy heavy government oversight. That said, if private companies could do this, but be absolutely crucified to the wall with oversight and regulation, I'd support it I suppose. But I just can't see NASA going away. Once someone figures out a way to market space, congress will have a hard time not passing a higher budget for NASA.
BamBam
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
745 Posts
January 04 2011 23:09 GMT
#54
What I dont understand is why people presumably assume that NASA and the PS are in this whole "war" if you will. As there is one thing NASA can do far better then PS ever will, and thats R&D. Sure the private sector can do that as well, but on a far limited budget and with barley half of what the NASA staff is.

Likewise, there is one thing the PS can do that far surpasses NASA, and that's making a profitable budget. Honestly I see PS getting into space a great thing, as this means NASA can continue to work more on R&D, and the PS can work on making it a practical, affordable technology to use. This is how I believe the next space era will go.

Because quite frankly, unless if there is money to be made from space, no one will dare touch it as any serious enterprise, and its up to these businesses to prove there is.
"two is way better than twice as one" - artosis
TheGreatWhiteHope_
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States335 Posts
January 04 2011 23:12 GMT
#55
On January 01 2011 09:51 On_Slaught wrote:
The private sector cuts corners like mad whenever they can. Keep them out of space exploration please.


You sir, are entirely misinformed.
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
January 04 2011 23:13 GMT
#56
On January 05 2011 08:12 RiB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 01 2011 09:51 On_Slaught wrote:
The private sector cuts corners like mad whenever they can. Keep them out of space exploration please.


You sir, are entirely misinformed.


Just looking at how they build airplanes, I don't trust them with space ships. I don't think he is entirely misinformed.

.Carnage
Profile Joined August 2010
United States99 Posts
January 04 2011 23:16 GMT
#57
NASA has to deal with politics and a lot more regulation, also Obama has cut their budget a lot. So OP has a good oint
He's just not the fastest zergling in the control group. -DayJ
pfods
Profile Joined September 2010
United States895 Posts
January 04 2011 23:20 GMT
#58
On January 05 2011 08:16 .Carnage wrote:
NASA has to deal with politics and a lot more regulation, also Obama has cut their budget a lot. So OP has a good oint


If by cut their budget you mean canceled the project to land ON DA MÜN!!!! again that the previous president felt was an ingenious idea because we certainly haven't done that already. By canceling it he forced the remaining budget into long term space exploration and a probable expedition to mars in 2025-2030. I, for one, am happy with that. I'd rather have actual science going into space then trying to fight an endless "whose dick is bigger" battle in space by doing campy, short term bullshit to appease the millions of mindless drones in this country.
thehitman
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
1105 Posts
January 04 2011 23:22 GMT
#59
Apart from the fake moon landing NASA hasn't achieved anything. Their rockets are the most dangerous ones and are all top technology, but Russia's 20 years old rockets are still more reliable than anything NASA has created.

China and Europe are also catching up to NASA fast and it will only be a matter of time when they run ahead of NASA!

User was warned for this post
Kamek
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada22 Posts
January 04 2011 23:26 GMT
#60
On January 05 2011 08:22 thehitman wrote:
Apart from the fake moon landing...


If you want anyone to take the rest of your post seriously you should probably not start it with that sentence.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 248 249 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 47m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 289
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3368
PianO 2312
Leta 464
Larva 430
Shinee 46
Noble 20
Sacsri 18
Dota 2
ODPixel391
NeuroSwarm113
League of Legends
JimRising 730
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1664
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor252
Other Games
summit1g13382
ViBE191
SortOf24
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick33986
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH342
• OhrlRock 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota290
League of Legends
• Jankos2540
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 47m
RSL Revival
2h 47m
Classic vs Clem
FEL
7h 47m
Elazer vs Spirit
Gerald vs MaNa
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
10h 47m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
1d 3h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.