EPTTL a little too strict on speech? - Page 16
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Quanticfograw
United States2053 Posts
| ||
|
ggrrg
Bulgaria2716 Posts
The example in the OP is a post with no meaning or purpose. Such posts not only don't contribute, but have a destructive effect on this site. They derail threads and hamper people to share their views on the actual topic. Just take a look at the other posts on page one that instead of discussing the topic, are targeted at the incredibly insightfull first comment... TL is not strict on speech. It is strict on destructive stupidy and pointless insults. In fact, the moderation on TL is damn close to perfect. On September 25 2010 07:59 Biff The Understudy wrote: The fact that Idra is not god is not an opinion, it's a fact, unless I really didn't understand something. He is just saying that Idra is not the oracle, and that he can eventually talk following his interest. Personally, I don't find that offensive. It doesn't matter if it is offensive or not. The post didn't serve any purpose but stirring a flamewar and derailing the thread, as can be seen when looking at the other posts on page one. Maybe the post would have been somewhat acceptable if there were one or two paragraphs (or at least a single sentence!) responding to Idra's concerns... On September 25 2010 07:57 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: You guys do know that there is a report feature, right? Sometimes posts get overlooked. If you use it properly, state the reason, and maybe cite that someone else was banned for the same thing, they'll not treat people differently. Oftentimes I think it's just that something was overlooked. People only get the report option after being members for one year. I believe that's quite good though, since it gives users enough time to get used to the standards of the forum. | ||
|
grigorin
Austria275 Posts
I think thats the reason why I didn't surpass 50 posts in the last couple of years. Keep TL.net clean! | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
cz
United States3249 Posts
On September 25 2010 08:49 Hesmyrr wrote: The moment you believe your basic right in real life applies to Team Liquid just as equally, you lose. To be fair I've seen about 10 people saying "lol 1st amendment doesn't apply here," but I haven't seen anyone claim that they have a LEGAL right to free speech here yet. OP is just saying the level of acceptable conduct is too high and should be lowered. | ||
|
wswordsmen
United States987 Posts
On September 25 2010 08:45 grigorin wrote: Wrote a post - deleted it, because I found it not very important. Now writing this, because I think it's quite a funny situation. More people should just delete their post before submitting shitty things ^_^ I think thats the reason why I didn't surpass 50 posts in the last couple of years. Keep TL.net clean! Know how you feel, though I think I posted a bit faster than you, compares numbers, might be a bit of an understatement. | ||
Hurricane
United States3939 Posts
As long as you write out your stance well, add thought to your argument and keep it from being inflammatory you're golden. Despite what a lot of new people think there is no rule written or unwritten about disagreeing with someone/something. It's how you present your disagreement that matters. | ||
|
RafikiSC
United States90 Posts
| ||
|
EGLzGaMeR
United States1867 Posts
 | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
On September 25 2010 08:30 Kennigit wrote: the goons sc2 board has a thread dedicated to whats wrong with TL's "lax" ban standards. We are not too strict rofl I just had a brilliant idea: Banned people have to pay $10 to rejoin. Seriously. + Show Spoiler + SA is an amazing forum, but I am too cheap to pay  | ||
|
QueueQueue
Canada1000 Posts
Honestly, I wouldn't even mind TL being more strict. There are far too many "whine" posts, personal attacks, etc that go unchecked. I guess the admins can only do so much. | ||
|
ckw
United States1018 Posts
On September 25 2010 02:39 chimthegrim wrote: This thread as an example: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=155453 The first response was a guy that said this: So now the question I am raising here is "Is TL a little too strict on what can or can't be said on the forums?" The example I provided is someone who in obvious disagreement and he has expressed that by saying "Idra isn't god." Yet, this is ban worthy? I'm wondering why it is so easy to get temp banned on TL. Well, just a thought. Hopefully I don't get banned for this post. No, the guy was trolling. You want that sort of thing allowed? Plus why would a FORUM have freedom of speech, this isn't America, it's the internet bro. | ||
|
saltywet
Hong Kong1316 Posts
On September 25 2010 09:16 ckw wrote: No, the guy was trolling. You want that sort of thing allowed? Plus why would a FORUM have freedom of speech, this isn't America, it's the internet bro. the internet is where the people of china go to to look for freedom of speech... | ||
|
Duckvillelol
Australia1253 Posts
It's not as crazy strict as elitistjerks.com (although that said, I'm fine with that too) And it's not an absolute snooze-fest like... well... most other forums out there. The TL balance is like Brood War. Just right. | ||
|
Scrubwave
Poland1786 Posts
| ||
|
Rev0lution
United States1805 Posts
| ||
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
I'm not complaining.  | ||
|
Savio
United States1850 Posts
Honestly, the only reason I think this thread stayed open is because its topic is "Are moderators too strict". imo, we should have the debate in this thread, but it should be done in a thread with a better OP and this one should be closed. | ||
|
Clamev
Germany498 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On September 25 2010 02:44 myopia wrote: TL's moderating is the finest on the internet. truuuth. I think it really on bothers the whiny newb trolls. Once you get used to it you'll never want to let it go | ||
| ||
