• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:03
CEST 07:03
KST 14:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting5[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO65.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)75Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition325.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)119
StarCraft 2
General
Revisiting the game after10 years and wow it's bad 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting The New Patch Killed Mech! Ladder Impersonation (only maybe)
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
BW caster Sayle Map with fog of war removed for one player? Pros React To: BarrackS + FlaSh Coaching vs SnOw After 20 seasons we have a lot of great maps Whose hotkey signature is this?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Semifinal A
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Siegecraft - a new perspective TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640} TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Inbreeding: Why Do We Do It…
Peanutsc
From Tilt to Ragequit:The Ps…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1093 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 687

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 685 686 687 688 689 1032 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 18:26 GMT
#13721
Thanks guys

followup question, for some of you that have used arraylists a bunch

my arraylist holds objects, and the objects have like, 2 ints and 3 strings

Is there an easier way to print a string of all the fields (ints and strings in every element) than to make a loop go through each element, and manually add every int and string of each element into one long string and then print the string

or is that what I need to do?
I was hoping there would be like, a method that would do that for me
I saw toString and tried that but it just returns the reference of the element of the arraylist instead of the actual fields of the element of the arraylist

so where I want something like "Tim 5 The Matrix Interstellar Joe 10 Independence Day", instead I am getting "mediaRentalManager.Customer@4e50df2emediaRentalManager.Customer@1d81eb93mediaRentalManager.Customer@7291c18f"


So, do I need to do this the long way I described?
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18088 Posts
December 05 2015 18:33 GMT
#13722
Wait what? Please don't try to use Object as a way of getting around Java's strong typing. As a beginning programmer, if you are using Object, you are doing it wrong (and most of the time, as an experienced Java programmer as well).

Tell us what you're trying to store in that arraylist, and we'll tell you a better way of doing it...

As for final classes: imho the use of final as a class modifier is retarded and doesn't make sense for Java (invent a different keyword). Final means immutable everywhere else, but for classes it means unextendable. It's dumb. But it's the way things work. Basically: don't make classes final unless you have a very good reason to (and as a beginning programmer, you probably will not have a good reason to make a class final, the situations that makes sense are quite rare and obscure)
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 18:43:27
December 05 2015 18:43 GMT
#13723
Okay I will describe what I have to do a bit better.

I am making a program that manages/tracks the renting of movies.
One specification of this program is that I have to keep track of customers (with an arraylist).

So I made a class for customers, and in it I have the necessary info. This includes things like their name, what they've rented, etc.

So, I have a method that is like addCustomer(String name, String rented, etc)

Then inside that method I've got

Customer currentCustomer = new Customer(name, rented);
Database.CustomerArrayList.add(currentCustomer);




Now the program also needs to be able to, when requested, print out all the info for every customer. What's the best way to do that? Or is my approach all wrong?
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 18:50:13
December 05 2015 18:48 GMT
#13724
Honestly, if all you're trying to do is print all the variables of objects into string format, then having an Array of Objects isn't really a terrible way to do it...not entirely sure why you'd want to, but it's not necessarily bad.

Important thing is that the ToString method can be (and for many cases, should be) overridden. So you're basically on the right track, you just need to actually define ToString in all of your classes to give a meaningful output.


But in a lot of cases, if your thought process is "I wish there was a method that did X", then the real solution is to make the method yourself.

EDIT: Okay, now that you've updated that...yeah, just override ToString in the Customer class to do what you want. Or write a new Method that prints all the variables as a string and then call that.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 18:59:37
December 05 2015 18:53 GMT
#13725
Well the project specifications require that we use arraylists to store all media objects and all customer objects.

But now I am about to ask a question I feel really, really stupid about asking.

I have an arraylist of objects (all the same type).
Those objects all have a field in common (a string)

HOW DO I REACH THAT STRING. lol
I feel so dumb for even having to ask this, but it seems like I can return an element of an arraylist but I can't actually reach the information contained in that element.

If I do arraylist.get(index) - there is no option for like .variable or .field or anything
which is different than normal arrays? IIRC I could just do system.out.print(array[index].variable)




I am guessing I have to do something like

String allInfo = "";

for(loop through everything){
Customer temporaryCustomer = arraylist.get(index)
allInfo = allInfo + temporaryCustomer.whateverString;
}

return allInfo;


just seems weird. like there would be an easier way to do it lol
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18088 Posts
December 05 2015 19:00 GMT
#13726
No. That looks good (except for the static use, and the exposure of local variables). But you don't have Integer and Strings in your arraylist, you have customers. So you need to define a pretty printer for your customers. Add a toString for your customers that does something like:

return name + " " + rented;

Then you just loop through your arraylist and println all of your customers (this will call toString on each of your customers and print that on a line). The default toString (inherited from Object) is simply the object name and its pointer, which is what you were complaining about earlier.

Now, addressing your Database, it should not just be exposing its innards to the rest of your program. That is not very OOP. Your model (in a model-view-controller architecture) should provide useful getters and setters to your data. So in this case, you should not access your customerArrayList directly from wherever you are doing that now, but you should have an addCustomer method in your Database object which does that functionality. To get your Customers, you should then just call db.getCustomers() (assuming db is a Database object, or... if you really want to do it statically, Database.getCustomers()). There is some movement to declaring final public fields instead of using getters and setters, but I'm not yet aboard. I find getters and setters are easier to debug even if they add (many) extra lines of code.

Remember that a final ArrayList (in java)doesn't mean you cannot add or delete elements to your array list. It just means you can only declare it as a new ArrayList once (when it is created): the pointer is immutable, not the object.
Zocat
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2229 Posts
December 05 2015 19:02 GMT
#13727
You are accessing the variable the correct way. Maybe it's private?

Use a StringBuilder. Those are nicer than what you are trying to do.

When you loop through everything your might want to use a foreach loop:
for (Customer c : database.CustomerArrayList) {
stringBuilder.append(c.whateverString);
}

return stringBuilder.toString();


Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 19:05 GMT
#13728
okay thank you that is very helpful

last question(I think)

I think I am using ArrayList wrong? Am I accidentally creating some sort of generic form of the arraylist that holds unspecified objects, and that's why I can't reach the fields within the elements?

Do I need to use new ArrayList<Customer> or something?
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:11:20
December 05 2015 19:08 GMT
#13729
Confusion was if you were using Objects, or just talking about objects in general. AKA, the difference between ArrayList<Customer> and ArrayList<Object>.

With an ArrayList, the get() function actually returns the object at that index, so you should keep that in a local variable. I'll be honest, this is really, really basic stuff, so this is something you should really try to understand before you move on further.

After that, I'd recommend looking up "foreach" loops.


EDIT: Okay, I guess you do understand those to some degree. Getting very confusing trying to figure out what you know and what you don't .

Answer is yes, you're apparently using an extremely generic ArrayList type. Object is the class that every other class extends from, which is why it will "work". If you want to call your class functions, you need the ArrayList to specify its of that type.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:15:42
December 05 2015 19:11 GMT
#13730
On December 06 2015 04:05 travis wrote:
okay thank you that is very helpful

last question(I think)

I think I am using ArrayList wrong? Am I accidentally creating some sort of generic form of the arraylist that holds unspecified objects, and that's why I can't reach the fields within the elements?

Do I need to use new ArrayList<Customer> or something?


You should be using an ArrayList of customers, but that wouldn't be why you can't access the fields. Did you declare the fields of your Customer class as private (you should have to encapsulate them). You'll need to make getters (and setters if the data needs to be changed) to access the fields.
+ Show Spoiler [example code] +

public class Customer {

private String name;
private int age;

public Customer(String name, int age) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
}

public String getName {
return name;
}

public int getAge {
return age;
}
}


then you can access the field by doing:
arraylist.get(1).getName; // returns the name of the Customer at index 1
arraylist.get(2).getAge; //returns the age of the Customer at index 2
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:16:29
December 05 2015 19:12 GMT
#13731
Okay thank you for being patient hehe
That was definitely my main problem, using the arraylist wrong

but this has been very helpful as to how I need to design this


no blitzkrieg I didn't set them private, though I know I should

even though sometimes it does seem like using getters and setters for everything is a pain in the ass
but my teachers insist it's good programming style

I'll admit I don't complete understand the necessity to always do it though, I actually don't even know what reasons there are, other than being able to change the getter/setter one time instead of having to potentially change your code in tens hundreds or thousands of other places

so, uh, actually I guess that is a pretty good reason lol
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18088 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:21:46
December 05 2015 19:14 GMT
#13732
On December 06 2015 04:05 travis wrote:
okay thank you that is very helpful

last question(I think)

I think I am using ArrayList wrong? Am I accidentally creating some sort of generic form of the arraylist that holds unspecified objects, and that's why I can't reach the fields within the elements?

Do I need to use new ArrayList<Customer> or something?

Yes. The default is ArrayList<Object> (and your IDE should be all up in your face with warnings and stuff if you leave the generics out). When you call get() on an arraylist with Objects, it will return an object of (duh) type Object. Now YOU know that that thing is actually a Customer, but Java doesn't (yet). You thus have to cast it to Customer first. This was the normal way of doing things before generics. Now, however, generics do all that work for you. Declare your Arraylist<Customer> and get() will return an object of type Customer for you, which will have the fields you're looking for.

@Blitzkrieg: to be honest, I can't remember what happens if you do

ArrayList<Object> foo = new ArrayList<>();
foo.add("bar");
String barString = foo.get(0);


In my mind this should be uncompilable. However, it might just be some really nasty warnings about implicit casts. I honestly don't remember.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 19:19 GMT
#13733
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18088 Posts
December 05 2015 19:24 GMT
#13734
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?

No. In fact, declare those variables final if they are only ever supposed to be set in the constructor.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
December 05 2015 19:25 GMT
#13735
It's still not a bad idea to use setters. Really, the entire point of having getters and setters is to control how values go in and out of the class, so you only have to look in one place if things need to change or if things go wrong.

Realistically, for smaller projects, you don't need them because you know roughly what everything is going to do. Eventually, though, you'll come to situations where you're not in control of everything, and the scope of your project extends beyond your initial expectations, so it's good to have the framework in place so you don't have to do major code rewrites every time.

(Of course, C# is so much nicer for getters and setters..."public string Word { get; set; }"...)
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:40:20
December 05 2015 19:32 GMT
#13736
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?


The point of a setter is that another class can't access the private field. The constructor can change the private field in the class because it is part of the class. Using the setter in the constructor doesn't make sense for this reason.

On December 06 2015 04:14 Acrofales wrote:
@Blitzkrieg: to be honest, I can't remember what happens if you do

ArrayList<Object> foo = new ArrayList<>();
foo.add("bar");
String barString = foo.get(0);


In my mind this should be uncompilable. However, it might just be some really nasty warnings about implicit casts. I honestly don't remember.

Your code would require a cast to work. I was thinking along the lines of
ArrayList<Object>foo = new Arraylist<>()
Customer test = new Customer(name, age);
foo.add(test);
String name = food.get(0).getName();

That should compile and work due to polymorphism.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18088 Posts
December 05 2015 19:36 GMT
#13737
On December 06 2015 04:25 WolfintheSheep wrote:
It's still not a bad idea to use setters. Really, the entire point of having getters and setters is to control how values go in and out of the class, so you only have to look in one place if things need to change or if things go wrong.

Realistically, for smaller projects, you don't need them because you know roughly what everything is going to do. Eventually, though, you'll come to situations where you're not in control of everything, and the scope of your project extends beyond your initial expectations, so it's good to have the framework in place so you don't have to do major code rewrites every time.

(Of course, C# is so much nicer for getters and setters..."public string Word { get; set; }"...)

Yeah sure. I still prefer final and setting them directly in the constructor It just better captures what those variables are all about imho. Of course, you have to think about your project first. For instance if you store "age" in a variable, then you'd better have a way to change that age every year. However, if you store "birthdate", you can just compute the age, and birthdate is immutable.

You'd also better be bloody sure you know at construction time what the value of those variables is, otherwise birthdate will be 0 (or null depending on long or object storage) forever. But if those are requirements, a final variable is great (and by definition doesn't need a setter).
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18088 Posts
December 05 2015 19:39 GMT
#13738
On December 06 2015 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?


The point of a setter is that another class can't access the private field. The constructor can change the private field in the class because it is part of the class. Using the setter in the constructor doesn't make sense for this reason.

Partially, and the debate still rages. But it is often argued that using the setter from within the class is also best, because it better controls the flow. By going to "setFoo" and finding everything that references it, you will know EVERYWHERE that could possibly be fucking with the value of foo. If you allow class methods to set foo without calling setFoo, then it's harder to debug (you now have to find everywhere within the class that sets foo, and everywhere outside the class that calls setFoo).
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 19:39 GMT
#13739
Now I am getting a warning, is it a legitimate warning, or just because eclipse doesn't understand what is happening

I have a "media" class, and it is a super class for my "movies" class, and my "music" class. The music and movies have some stuff in common, and the project requires basic use of inheritance, so I structured it this way. Plus you need to have an arraylist for media, not an arraylist for movies and an arraylist for music.



so, in my code I do:

Movies newMovie = new Movies(title, copiesAvailable, rating);
Database.Media.add(newMovie);


as well as

Music newMusic = new Music(title, copiesAvailable, artist, songs);
Database.Media.add(newMusic);


but java is giving me a warning "the method add(object) belongs to the raw type of Arraylist, References to the generic type of arraylist need to be parameterized".

Can I just ignore this warning or is there something else I should be doing
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:52:25
December 05 2015 19:43 GMT
#13740
On December 06 2015 04:39 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2015 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?


The point of a setter is that another class can't access the private field. The constructor can change the private field in the class because it is part of the class. Using the setter in the constructor doesn't make sense for this reason.

Partially, and the debate still rages. But it is often argued that using the setter from within the class is also best, because it better controls the flow. By going to "setFoo" and finding everything that references it, you will know EVERYWHERE that could possibly be fucking with the value of foo. If you allow class methods to set foo without calling setFoo, then it's harder to debug (you now have to find everywhere within the class that sets foo, and everywhere outside the class that calls setFoo).


In any other method sure, but in the constructor? Using the setter in the constructor just feels stupid to me.

On December 06 2015 04:39 travis wrote:
Now I am getting a warning, is it a legitimate warning, or just because eclipse doesn't understand what is happening

I have a "media" class, and it is a super class for my "movies" class, and my "music" class. The music and movies have some stuff in common, and the project requires basic use of inheritance, so I structured it this way. Plus you need to have an arraylist for media, not an arraylist for movies and an arraylist for music.



so, in my code I do:

Movies newMovie = new Movies(title, copiesAvailable, rating);
Database.Media.add(newMovie);


as well as

Music newMusic = new Music(title, copiesAvailable, artist, songs);
Database.Media.add(newMusic);


but java is giving me a warning "the method add(object) belongs to the raw type of Arraylist, References to the generic type of arraylist need to be parameterized".

Can I just ignore this warning or is there something else I should be doing


When you create the object it needs to be a Media. The ArrayList holds Media. Movie is a Media. Music is a Media. When you get the objects from the ArrayList later polymorphism will know which methods to use.

Media newMovie = new Movies(...);
Database.Media.add(newMovie);
Media newMusic = new Music(...);
Daatabase.Media.add(newMusic);
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Prev 1 685 686 687 688 689 1032 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
PiGosaur Cup #53
Liquipedia
OSC
23:00
OSC Masters Cup #150 Qual #1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 50
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 563
Bale 37
Icarus 11
Sea 0
Dota 2
monkeys_forever885
NeuroSwarm80
League of Legends
JimRising 781
Counter-Strike
ScreaM582
Stewie2K409
Coldzera 78
Other Games
summit1g6822
WinterStarcraft304
C9.Mang0255
hungrybox186
Tasteless61
RuFF_SC251
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL7089
Other Games
gamesdonequick2363
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH106
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo811
• Jankos644
• HappyZerGling125
Other Games
• Scarra518
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
4h 57m
OSC
6h 57m
Wardi Open
1d 5h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Safe House 2
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Safe House 2
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.