• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:59
CEST 06:59
KST 13:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1157 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 687

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 685 686 687 688 689 1031 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 18:26 GMT
#13721
Thanks guys

followup question, for some of you that have used arraylists a bunch

my arraylist holds objects, and the objects have like, 2 ints and 3 strings

Is there an easier way to print a string of all the fields (ints and strings in every element) than to make a loop go through each element, and manually add every int and string of each element into one long string and then print the string

or is that what I need to do?
I was hoping there would be like, a method that would do that for me
I saw toString and tried that but it just returns the reference of the element of the arraylist instead of the actual fields of the element of the arraylist

so where I want something like "Tim 5 The Matrix Interstellar Joe 10 Independence Day", instead I am getting "mediaRentalManager.Customer@4e50df2emediaRentalManager.Customer@1d81eb93mediaRentalManager.Customer@7291c18f"


So, do I need to do this the long way I described?
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
December 05 2015 18:33 GMT
#13722
Wait what? Please don't try to use Object as a way of getting around Java's strong typing. As a beginning programmer, if you are using Object, you are doing it wrong (and most of the time, as an experienced Java programmer as well).

Tell us what you're trying to store in that arraylist, and we'll tell you a better way of doing it...

As for final classes: imho the use of final as a class modifier is retarded and doesn't make sense for Java (invent a different keyword). Final means immutable everywhere else, but for classes it means unextendable. It's dumb. But it's the way things work. Basically: don't make classes final unless you have a very good reason to (and as a beginning programmer, you probably will not have a good reason to make a class final, the situations that makes sense are quite rare and obscure)
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 18:43:27
December 05 2015 18:43 GMT
#13723
Okay I will describe what I have to do a bit better.

I am making a program that manages/tracks the renting of movies.
One specification of this program is that I have to keep track of customers (with an arraylist).

So I made a class for customers, and in it I have the necessary info. This includes things like their name, what they've rented, etc.

So, I have a method that is like addCustomer(String name, String rented, etc)

Then inside that method I've got

Customer currentCustomer = new Customer(name, rented);
Database.CustomerArrayList.add(currentCustomer);




Now the program also needs to be able to, when requested, print out all the info for every customer. What's the best way to do that? Or is my approach all wrong?
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 18:50:13
December 05 2015 18:48 GMT
#13724
Honestly, if all you're trying to do is print all the variables of objects into string format, then having an Array of Objects isn't really a terrible way to do it...not entirely sure why you'd want to, but it's not necessarily bad.

Important thing is that the ToString method can be (and for many cases, should be) overridden. So you're basically on the right track, you just need to actually define ToString in all of your classes to give a meaningful output.


But in a lot of cases, if your thought process is "I wish there was a method that did X", then the real solution is to make the method yourself.

EDIT: Okay, now that you've updated that...yeah, just override ToString in the Customer class to do what you want. Or write a new Method that prints all the variables as a string and then call that.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 18:59:37
December 05 2015 18:53 GMT
#13725
Well the project specifications require that we use arraylists to store all media objects and all customer objects.

But now I am about to ask a question I feel really, really stupid about asking.

I have an arraylist of objects (all the same type).
Those objects all have a field in common (a string)

HOW DO I REACH THAT STRING. lol
I feel so dumb for even having to ask this, but it seems like I can return an element of an arraylist but I can't actually reach the information contained in that element.

If I do arraylist.get(index) - there is no option for like .variable or .field or anything
which is different than normal arrays? IIRC I could just do system.out.print(array[index].variable)




I am guessing I have to do something like

String allInfo = "";

for(loop through everything){
Customer temporaryCustomer = arraylist.get(index)
allInfo = allInfo + temporaryCustomer.whateverString;
}

return allInfo;


just seems weird. like there would be an easier way to do it lol
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
December 05 2015 19:00 GMT
#13726
No. That looks good (except for the static use, and the exposure of local variables). But you don't have Integer and Strings in your arraylist, you have customers. So you need to define a pretty printer for your customers. Add a toString for your customers that does something like:

return name + " " + rented;

Then you just loop through your arraylist and println all of your customers (this will call toString on each of your customers and print that on a line). The default toString (inherited from Object) is simply the object name and its pointer, which is what you were complaining about earlier.

Now, addressing your Database, it should not just be exposing its innards to the rest of your program. That is not very OOP. Your model (in a model-view-controller architecture) should provide useful getters and setters to your data. So in this case, you should not access your customerArrayList directly from wherever you are doing that now, but you should have an addCustomer method in your Database object which does that functionality. To get your Customers, you should then just call db.getCustomers() (assuming db is a Database object, or... if you really want to do it statically, Database.getCustomers()). There is some movement to declaring final public fields instead of using getters and setters, but I'm not yet aboard. I find getters and setters are easier to debug even if they add (many) extra lines of code.

Remember that a final ArrayList (in java)doesn't mean you cannot add or delete elements to your array list. It just means you can only declare it as a new ArrayList once (when it is created): the pointer is immutable, not the object.
Zocat
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany2229 Posts
December 05 2015 19:02 GMT
#13727
You are accessing the variable the correct way. Maybe it's private?

Use a StringBuilder. Those are nicer than what you are trying to do.

When you loop through everything your might want to use a foreach loop:
for (Customer c : database.CustomerArrayList) {
stringBuilder.append(c.whateverString);
}

return stringBuilder.toString();


Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 19:05 GMT
#13728
okay thank you that is very helpful

last question(I think)

I think I am using ArrayList wrong? Am I accidentally creating some sort of generic form of the arraylist that holds unspecified objects, and that's why I can't reach the fields within the elements?

Do I need to use new ArrayList<Customer> or something?
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:11:20
December 05 2015 19:08 GMT
#13729
Confusion was if you were using Objects, or just talking about objects in general. AKA, the difference between ArrayList<Customer> and ArrayList<Object>.

With an ArrayList, the get() function actually returns the object at that index, so you should keep that in a local variable. I'll be honest, this is really, really basic stuff, so this is something you should really try to understand before you move on further.

After that, I'd recommend looking up "foreach" loops.


EDIT: Okay, I guess you do understand those to some degree. Getting very confusing trying to figure out what you know and what you don't .

Answer is yes, you're apparently using an extremely generic ArrayList type. Object is the class that every other class extends from, which is why it will "work". If you want to call your class functions, you need the ArrayList to specify its of that type.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:15:42
December 05 2015 19:11 GMT
#13730
On December 06 2015 04:05 travis wrote:
okay thank you that is very helpful

last question(I think)

I think I am using ArrayList wrong? Am I accidentally creating some sort of generic form of the arraylist that holds unspecified objects, and that's why I can't reach the fields within the elements?

Do I need to use new ArrayList<Customer> or something?


You should be using an ArrayList of customers, but that wouldn't be why you can't access the fields. Did you declare the fields of your Customer class as private (you should have to encapsulate them). You'll need to make getters (and setters if the data needs to be changed) to access the fields.
+ Show Spoiler [example code] +

public class Customer {

private String name;
private int age;

public Customer(String name, int age) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
}

public String getName {
return name;
}

public int getAge {
return age;
}
}


then you can access the field by doing:
arraylist.get(1).getName; // returns the name of the Customer at index 1
arraylist.get(2).getAge; //returns the age of the Customer at index 2
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:16:29
December 05 2015 19:12 GMT
#13731
Okay thank you for being patient hehe
That was definitely my main problem, using the arraylist wrong

but this has been very helpful as to how I need to design this


no blitzkrieg I didn't set them private, though I know I should

even though sometimes it does seem like using getters and setters for everything is a pain in the ass
but my teachers insist it's good programming style

I'll admit I don't complete understand the necessity to always do it though, I actually don't even know what reasons there are, other than being able to change the getter/setter one time instead of having to potentially change your code in tens hundreds or thousands of other places

so, uh, actually I guess that is a pretty good reason lol
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:21:46
December 05 2015 19:14 GMT
#13732
On December 06 2015 04:05 travis wrote:
okay thank you that is very helpful

last question(I think)

I think I am using ArrayList wrong? Am I accidentally creating some sort of generic form of the arraylist that holds unspecified objects, and that's why I can't reach the fields within the elements?

Do I need to use new ArrayList<Customer> or something?

Yes. The default is ArrayList<Object> (and your IDE should be all up in your face with warnings and stuff if you leave the generics out). When you call get() on an arraylist with Objects, it will return an object of (duh) type Object. Now YOU know that that thing is actually a Customer, but Java doesn't (yet). You thus have to cast it to Customer first. This was the normal way of doing things before generics. Now, however, generics do all that work for you. Declare your Arraylist<Customer> and get() will return an object of type Customer for you, which will have the fields you're looking for.

@Blitzkrieg: to be honest, I can't remember what happens if you do

ArrayList<Object> foo = new ArrayList<>();
foo.add("bar");
String barString = foo.get(0);


In my mind this should be uncompilable. However, it might just be some really nasty warnings about implicit casts. I honestly don't remember.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 19:19 GMT
#13733
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
December 05 2015 19:24 GMT
#13734
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?

No. In fact, declare those variables final if they are only ever supposed to be set in the constructor.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
December 05 2015 19:25 GMT
#13735
It's still not a bad idea to use setters. Really, the entire point of having getters and setters is to control how values go in and out of the class, so you only have to look in one place if things need to change or if things go wrong.

Realistically, for smaller projects, you don't need them because you know roughly what everything is going to do. Eventually, though, you'll come to situations where you're not in control of everything, and the scope of your project extends beyond your initial expectations, so it's good to have the framework in place so you don't have to do major code rewrites every time.

(Of course, C# is so much nicer for getters and setters..."public string Word { get; set; }"...)
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:40:20
December 05 2015 19:32 GMT
#13736
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?


The point of a setter is that another class can't access the private field. The constructor can change the private field in the class because it is part of the class. Using the setter in the constructor doesn't make sense for this reason.

On December 06 2015 04:14 Acrofales wrote:
@Blitzkrieg: to be honest, I can't remember what happens if you do

ArrayList<Object> foo = new ArrayList<>();
foo.add("bar");
String barString = foo.get(0);


In my mind this should be uncompilable. However, it might just be some really nasty warnings about implicit casts. I honestly don't remember.

Your code would require a cast to work. I was thinking along the lines of
ArrayList<Object>foo = new Arraylist<>()
Customer test = new Customer(name, age);
foo.add(test);
String name = food.get(0).getName();

That should compile and work due to polymorphism.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
December 05 2015 19:36 GMT
#13737
On December 06 2015 04:25 WolfintheSheep wrote:
It's still not a bad idea to use setters. Really, the entire point of having getters and setters is to control how values go in and out of the class, so you only have to look in one place if things need to change or if things go wrong.

Realistically, for smaller projects, you don't need them because you know roughly what everything is going to do. Eventually, though, you'll come to situations where you're not in control of everything, and the scope of your project extends beyond your initial expectations, so it's good to have the framework in place so you don't have to do major code rewrites every time.

(Of course, C# is so much nicer for getters and setters..."public string Word { get; set; }"...)

Yeah sure. I still prefer final and setting them directly in the constructor It just better captures what those variables are all about imho. Of course, you have to think about your project first. For instance if you store "age" in a variable, then you'd better have a way to change that age every year. However, if you store "birthdate", you can just compute the age, and birthdate is immutable.

You'd also better be bloody sure you know at construction time what the value of those variables is, otherwise birthdate will be 0 (or null depending on long or object storage) forever. But if those are requirements, a final variable is great (and by definition doesn't need a setter).
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
December 05 2015 19:39 GMT
#13738
On December 06 2015 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?


The point of a setter is that another class can't access the private field. The constructor can change the private field in the class because it is part of the class. Using the setter in the constructor doesn't make sense for this reason.

Partially, and the debate still rages. But it is often argued that using the setter from within the class is also best, because it better controls the flow. By going to "setFoo" and finding everything that references it, you will know EVERYWHERE that could possibly be fucking with the value of foo. If you allow class methods to set foo without calling setFoo, then it's harder to debug (you now have to find everywhere within the class that sets foo, and everywhere outside the class that calls setFoo).
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
December 05 2015 19:39 GMT
#13739
Now I am getting a warning, is it a legitimate warning, or just because eclipse doesn't understand what is happening

I have a "media" class, and it is a super class for my "movies" class, and my "music" class. The music and movies have some stuff in common, and the project requires basic use of inheritance, so I structured it this way. Plus you need to have an arraylist for media, not an arraylist for movies and an arraylist for music.



so, in my code I do:

Movies newMovie = new Movies(title, copiesAvailable, rating);
Database.Media.add(newMovie);


as well as

Music newMusic = new Music(title, copiesAvailable, artist, songs);
Database.Media.add(newMusic);


but java is giving me a warning "the method add(object) belongs to the raw type of Arraylist, References to the generic type of arraylist need to be parameterized".

Can I just ignore this warning or is there something else I should be doing
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-12-05 19:52:25
December 05 2015 19:43 GMT
#13740
On December 06 2015 04:39 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2015 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
On December 06 2015 04:19 travis wrote:
What about using setters in a constructor?

For purposes of this specific project I am doing, I won't need to ever set those values once they have been constructed, so I feel like I don't really need to use setters (though getters are needed).

Is there a point to using setters in a constructor ?


The point of a setter is that another class can't access the private field. The constructor can change the private field in the class because it is part of the class. Using the setter in the constructor doesn't make sense for this reason.

Partially, and the debate still rages. But it is often argued that using the setter from within the class is also best, because it better controls the flow. By going to "setFoo" and finding everything that references it, you will know EVERYWHERE that could possibly be fucking with the value of foo. If you allow class methods to set foo without calling setFoo, then it's harder to debug (you now have to find everywhere within the class that sets foo, and everywhere outside the class that calls setFoo).


In any other method sure, but in the constructor? Using the setter in the constructor just feels stupid to me.

On December 06 2015 04:39 travis wrote:
Now I am getting a warning, is it a legitimate warning, or just because eclipse doesn't understand what is happening

I have a "media" class, and it is a super class for my "movies" class, and my "music" class. The music and movies have some stuff in common, and the project requires basic use of inheritance, so I structured it this way. Plus you need to have an arraylist for media, not an arraylist for movies and an arraylist for music.



so, in my code I do:

Movies newMovie = new Movies(title, copiesAvailable, rating);
Database.Media.add(newMovie);


as well as

Music newMusic = new Music(title, copiesAvailable, artist, songs);
Database.Media.add(newMusic);


but java is giving me a warning "the method add(object) belongs to the raw type of Arraylist, References to the generic type of arraylist need to be parameterized".

Can I just ignore this warning or is there something else I should be doing


When you create the object it needs to be a Media. The ArrayList holds Media. Movie is a Media. Music is a Media. When you get the objects from the ArrayList later polymorphism will know which methods to use.

Media newMovie = new Movies(...);
Database.Media.add(newMovie);
Media newMusic = new Music(...);
Daatabase.Media.add(newMusic);
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Prev 1 685 686 687 688 689 1031 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#49
Liquipedia
OSC
23:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #16
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft519
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 571
Noble 54
ajuk12(nOOB) 41
Icarus 9
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm138
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K448
semphis_45
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King37
Other Games
summit1g5047
C9.Mang0302
XaKoH 152
ViBE145
SortOf48
Trikslyr34
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick705
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• OhrlRock 98
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1138
• Lourlo996
• Stunt420
Other Games
• Scarra1197
Upcoming Events
LiuLi Cup
6h 1m
OSC
14h 1m
RSL Revival
1d 5h
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
1d 8h
RSL Revival
2 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.