O SHI- Nasa's bombing the moon - Page 7
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
b_unnies
3579 Posts
| ||
|
iRRelevance
Romania725 Posts
On October 11 2009 08:27 MuR)Ernu wrote: you can see them possibly because you are regged or logged in in sk-gaming or something. I cant see it either and i'm not from angola Yep, Sk-gaming seems to have a screwed-up image viewing system. I can see the picture on my desktop but i can't see it on my laptop unless I google it first. No hard feelings fanatacist man, didn't mean to make fun of your country or anything. | ||
|
r1fl3m4n
United States28 Posts
On October 11 2009 06:48 craz3d wrote: The russians tried doing that, then they realized there's no oxygen on the moon, so bombs are out of the equation. No. Bombs (C4, gunpowder, TNT, etc) have their own oxidizer. That means they don't need any extra oxygen to detonate. If they needed the oxygen out of the air, then any "bomb" would just fizzle because the concentration of oxygen in air isn't too great (Like gasoline burning). But you don't need bombs for this experiment.. because: You can just accelerate an object to fast speeds and just ram it into the moon. For example, a kilogram of TNT exploded releases 4.184 × 10^6 J. But a object that is 1Kg traveling at 2892 meter/sec (Or ~6500 mi/hr) can do the same job. And in space travel, those speeds are not really hard to reach. Plus, with the second method, you don't have to worry about the mechanisms for detonating the TNT working. | ||
|
Physician
United States4146 Posts
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/charles_elachi_on_the_mars_rovers.html http://www.ted.com/speakers/bill_stone.html <3<3<3 NASA <3<3<3 <3 ESA <3 | ||
|
Husky
United States3362 Posts
On October 13 2009 11:59 Physician wrote: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/carolyn_porco_flies_us_to_saturn.html http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/charles_elachi_on_the_mars_rovers.html http://www.ted.com/speakers/bill_stone.html <3<3<3 NASA <3<3<3 Thanks for these! Space is such an amazing thing. I really wish NASA had more funding. They are the best. | ||
|
rredtooth
5460 Posts
| ||
|
Ichigo1234551
United States649 Posts
| ||
|
FoBuLouS
United States570 Posts
| ||
|
EsX_Raptor
United States2802 Posts
On October 13 2009 12:34 Ichigo1234551 wrote: so did they find water? | ||
|
Physician
United States4146 Posts
On October 13 2009 12:34 Ichigo1234551 wrote: so did they find water? “A preliminary analysis of the STIS spectra do not show any clear evidence for hydroxyl, but further analysis is needed,” said Hubble co-investigator Alex Storrs. So far, no. The lcross team refers it will take "days" for full analysis (why? they need to analyze the data from several sources and over time: http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/water.htm) You can follow details at http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/ | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10798 Posts
| ||
|
Nylan
United States795 Posts
On October 13 2009 15:57 Velr wrote: I also want to smash stuff into planets... Sounds like a real fun job... It is. | ||
|
SlobodanMilosevic
Serbia7 Posts
THEY FOUND WATER ON THE MOON omfg omfg omfg omfg omfg omfg omfg | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://s.sk-gaming.com/image/image/63b515f27151c1ccx.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i38.tinypic.com/a2tdp1.png)
![[image loading]](http://i36.tinypic.com/20f8eb.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i38.tinypic.com/33eotqf.jpg)