EPTEVE Corporation - Page 1863
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
hugitout
United States379 Posts
| ||
|
Boggler
Canada234 Posts
edit, and sucks if you did get banned, but that would be a win | ||
|
Warri
Germany3208 Posts
On July 14 2014 01:22 Boggler wrote: I don't see how it is possible to accidentally exploit this drone bug. edit, and sucks if you did get banned, but that would be a win if they didnt rmt all their ISK id consider this a loss. | ||
|
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
Also why abuse bugs ='[ Edit: found the workaround! Now I can continue losing at EVE Edit: welp, steam workaround not working because it still asks for credentials but does not accept steam credentials. Guess I am still winning EVE for now. sucks | ||
|
Rengas
United States169 Posts
On July 14 2014 01:22 Boggler wrote: I don't see how it is possible to accidentally exploit this drone bug. edit, and sucks if you did get banned, but that would be a win Exploiting is just a higher form of pvp. Source: some spooky wizards on my team offlined the HUN link tengu's subsystems in the ATX finals. | ||
|
Boggler
Canada234 Posts
Also, I think CCP helping with the rise in PLEX prices. More expensive they are, more people buy them with real $, and more people use real $ to sub. Although, everything I am reading about current subs says Eve approaching an all time low in subs, and less and less concurrent people playing. As for RMT, it looks like you can get PLEX for $11usd. This is not bad and put RMT above minimum hourly wage. (If you can dump the FW LP) | ||
|
DefMatrixUltra
Canada1992 Posts
On July 13 2014 22:07 419 wrote: LOL how do you even code something like that This is one of the oddities of making drones their own entity rather than an abstraction tied to a ship (and thus, a player). | ||
|
Impervious
Canada4200 Posts
On July 14 2014 01:13 hugitout wrote: only apples got banned afaik Oh? For how long, it's not a perm, is it? | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
gapples is unbanned un-coincidentally after making change.gov petition thanks Obama | ||
|
0m3ga
Serbia322 Posts
On July 14 2014 12:59 419 wrote: rhiload went to jail for like fourteen days gapples is unbanned un-coincidentally after making change.gov petition thanks Obama rhiload woke up and exploited hard without realizing the ccp fatwa order was up http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=24394285 o7 to ur moon mining OP ![[image loading]](http://i.snag.gy/Qu8Qq.jpg) | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
Turns out 25 virus strength is rather suboptimal for nullsec. I lucked out with one database and failed a good 5 others. Managed to loot a mainframe here and there, and ended up with an overall 20mil estimated value in decyptors and datacores. At least I got out safely. The area was starting to get populated; on my way back to the wormhole I ran across 2 people and, accoring to the overview, a cynosural field. | ||
|
CatharsisUT
United States487 Posts
| ||
|
Laserist
Turkey4269 Posts
This is why I never warp into the wormholes. Is it possible to have something good out of wormholes with cheapest T1 equipment and no skill? | ||
|
intana
United Kingdom26 Posts
On July 16 2014 01:53 Laserist wrote: Is it possible to have something good out of wormholes with cheapest T1 equipment and no skill? Yes. If you take someone else's stuff. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On July 16 2014 01:46 CatharsisUT wrote: If you were that deep in nullsec, it's a lot like dealing with wild animals. They're more afraid of you than you are of them. I find it highly unlikely that someone would be afraid of a Magnate named Rubble, flown by a Capsuleer that was born 2 weeks ago. On July 16 2014 01:53 Laserist wrote: @spinesheath This is why I never warp into the wormholes. Is it possible to have something good out of wormholes with cheapest T1 equipment and no skill? Apparently you can loot in nullsec with T1 equipment. I run a Magnate with just a launcher, 8 core scanner probes, 2 scan strength rigs, 2 analyzers and an afterburner. Probably could even drop one or both of the rigs now that I have a few more skills trained. Locating a site isn't a problem (it just might take a while). The loot is the same (or I hope so), and if you get lucky you can successfully hack even the hard sites. But you'll explode a lot of stuff. Nullsec feels a lot safer than lowsec. Oh the irony. In lowsec there always are multiple people in a system, and I've ran into my fair share of people who camp sites in a cloaked ship. 25 virus strength is really awkward, it takes 4 turns to kill the 80 coherence nodes, which means a lot of damage taken. Suppressor nodes reduce your strength to 10, at which point you might just give up. | ||
|
Shootemup.
United States1044 Posts
On July 16 2014 03:02 spinesheath wrote: I find it highly unlikely that someone would be afraid of a Magnate named Rubble, flown by a Capsuleer that was born 2 weeks ago. Apparently you can loot in nullsec with T1 equipment. I run a Magnate with just a launcher, 8 core scanner probes, 2 scan strength rigs, 2 analyzers and an afterburner. Probably could even drop one or both of the rigs now that I have a few more skills trained. Locating a site isn't a problem (it just might take a while). The loot is the same (or I hope so), and if you get lucky you can successfully hack even the hard sites. But you'll explode a lot of stuff. Nullsec feels a lot safer than lowsec. Oh the irony. In lowsec there always are multiple people in a system, and I've ran into my fair share of people who camp sites in a cloaked ship. 25 virus strength is really awkward, it takes 4 turns to kill the 80 coherence nodes, which means a lot of damage taken. Suppressor nodes reduce your strength to 10, at which point you might just give up. Deep Nullsec is pretty safe for the most part; there just aren't that many people there and those that are there are primarily care bears who belong to the alliance who owns that system. | ||
|
CatharsisUT
United States487 Posts
| ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On July 16 2014 04:19 CatharsisUT wrote: Right. spine, I don't think you understand the deep nullsec mentality. Literally the first thing they learn when they get there is "dock up when a neutral is in local." Dock? Where? But fine, I can live with that  I don't think I ran across any stations in my nullsec journey... | ||
| ||
