EPTiBP-NCG Match-Fixing Scandal - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
yawnoC
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
Which is really sad for the NA scene. | ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
| ||
|
aBcaret
United States7 Posts
| ||
|
MassHysteria
United States3678 Posts
What hurt R.Lewis more than anything the first time is the fact that it was Shahzam who was essentially his main source of information. Anything that came from shahzam was going to initially cause negative reactions/ mixed emotions. With this said, I myself was really surprised at how the cs:go community really didn't care all too much. I thought it would be like sc2, with people even wanting to email sponsors, etc but the major consensus of the community seemed to not take it too seriously. Or just be willing to look past it. R.Lewis does seem to have shahzam's back in his piece. He portrays him in a good way, etc.. Definitely a little I scratch your back, you scratch mine going on between them. Good investigating by him in any way. | ||
|
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
Good work by Lewis. | ||
|
ahswtini
Northern Ireland22211 Posts
| ||
|
wallhacker
5 Posts
| ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On January 17 2015 20:18 wallhacker wrote: there's no point to having picking up a roster that can't be on CSGL. Am I wrong thinking the only way teams get exposure in CSGO is if a match is on CSGL, there's a LAN, or the reddits? skins definitely help with exposing the game to more viewers. Remember when CSGL banned ESEA from their site? ESEA only had like 400 viewers a match for those 2 weeks. | ||
|
Miragee
8620 Posts
On January 17 2015 21:04 amazingxkcd wrote: skins definitely help with exposing the game to more viewers. Remember when CSGL banned ESEA from their site? ESEA only had like 400 viewers a match for those 2 weeks. And that's completly stupid. It should be about the game not the skins. | ||
|
plgElwood
Germany518 Posts
Becaus of the "Box Dropping" and the need to buy a key to have a chance of "winning content", it's basicly per definition lottery and gamble. If valve does not have a licencse it could even get banned in germany. | ||
|
okramv
Cuba30 Posts
On January 17 2015 21:04 amazingxkcd wrote: skins definitely help with exposing the game to more viewers. Remember when CSGL banned ESEA from their site? ESEA only had like 400 viewers a match for those 2 weeks. That's also when the game had 20k concurrents. Now it has close to 400k concurrents | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
|
TurboDreams
United States427 Posts
| ||
Wunder
United Kingdom2950 Posts
| ||
|
wallhacker
5 Posts
| ||
|
DEN1ED
United States1087 Posts
On January 17 2015 21:12 Miragee wrote: And that's completly stupid. It should be about the game not the skins. Not really. Betting skins adds interest to games that otherwise don't interest people. Sure, as a Cloud9/NiP fan I will watch all their games just to watch and love it. Same goes for any matches at Majors/Lans. But random cevo week 4.2 match between Lunatik and Area 51 I really don't give a shit about unless I can bet skins. | ||
|
Miragee
8620 Posts
On January 18 2015 01:10 DEN1ED wrote: Not really. Betting skins adds interest to games that otherwise don't interest me. Sure, as a Cloud9/NiP fan I will watch all their games just to watch and love it. Same goes for any matches at Majors/Lans. But random cevo week 4.2 match between Lunatik and Area 51 I really don't give a shit about unless I can bet skins. You still don't give a shit about that random game. You give a shit about the skins. | ||
|
RuiBarbO
United States1340 Posts
| ||
|
DEN1ED
United States1087 Posts
On January 18 2015 01:13 Miragee wrote: You still don't give a shit about that random game. You give a shit about the skins. Exactly, but now I am at least watching the game. So the views dropping dramatically when esea was banned makes perfect sense. You can say it's stupid, but it's reality. | ||
| ||
