EPTaccording to all this "data" if u can call it, does seem to be 8 highmaul mythic bosses
interesting that they changed it and 0 mention of it in patch notes anywhere #justblizzardthings
[wow] Warlords of Draenor - Page 430
| Forum Index > General Games |
Add yourself to the player list | ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
according to all this "data" if u can call it, does seem to be 8 highmaul mythic bosses interesting that they changed it and 0 mention of it in patch notes anywhere #justblizzardthings | ||
|
EscPlan9
United States2777 Posts
Demo: DB isn't dead, but I did about 8% lower dps than before. Cataclysm is just as good as DB ST and obviously better multi-target. DS is slightly worse than even the nerfed DB. This surprised me. Affliction is still miles behind Demo in single and multi target, like 17% worse. Though I only have a 2pc set and I didn't go through and re-enchant all my gear to be +Haste instead of +Mastery so perhaps it isn't quite so bad. (Trying to pick up an offset for affliction so I don't have to keep re-enchanting/gemming my gear when I feel like going afflic) Destro? I dunno never play Destro. At least my Blood Elf lady lock looks hotter than before? | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
EscPlan9, have you updated simcraft? The results here don't agree http://darkintentions.net/61-demonology-warlock-guide.html Affliction isn't updated but i highly doubt it's that behind Demo. In fact, no dps spec in the game does 17% less dps than demo, including the 2 worst shadow priest specs. The reason it looks behind is probably hog/cata cleave on the second dummy there, you can't get ST results on dummies. | ||
|
EscPlan9
United States2777 Posts
| ||
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
| ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
caelym
United States6421 Posts
| ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20318 Posts
Just a heads up guys, there seems to be a bug or performance problem somewhere. Standing on one spot when i just logged in (6.1 just came up on EU) i have 320fps at 1080p max settings, CPU bound. Turning SSAA 2x on puts that to 100fps. Disabling shadows and leaving everything else in the same results in 275fps. The game literally runs almost three times faster with shadows on low vs ultra. This is on an OC'd 4770k+980 system with about 1.15GB of VRAM usage. Here's the scene in question, was logging one char to tag the heirlooms: ![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/gbSQq.png) ![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/gbSOL.png) This is MAX settings 1080p with 2xSSAA. The only setting changed is Shadow Quality. The reason i think it might be a bug is because the SSAA setting is brand new, and it's extremely weird to see such a huge performance deficit from Shadows. My game didn't react like this before on either 1080p or on 4k, yet 1080p with 2xSSAA and performance is way worse than expected with Shadows maxed. Yep, something is DEFINITELY fucky here. Shadow quality "fair" to "ultra" = 103-105fps. Shadow quality low = 275fps. SSAA 2x = ~280fps - going into advanced options and setting render scale 200% plus MSAA 8x/8x = ~190fps. On 144hz that makes me a very FPS drops moving around, so guess i'l just play max without shadows (even when it's not bugged, it costs too much performance on cpu and gpu) and supersampling +2-4x msaa | ||
|
EscPlan9
United States2777 Posts
http://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/363189-25-heroic-brf-kills-and-only-a-heroic-cache/ "For the sake of further clarification, Highmaul progression is not required to unlock Blackrock Foundry Raid Missions. Progressing in Highmaul provides an alternate way to unlock Blackrock Foundry Raid Missions, but it's not required." "Were the kills loot eligible? Killing the same boss multiple times in the same week does not count as a loot eligible kill." Also twitter post from WarcraftDevs: "You do not need Highmaul progress in order to unlock Foundry Mission caches. It’s an alternate method, but not required." | ||
|
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
Nisyax
Netherlands756 Posts
| ||
|
Duvon
Sweden2360 Posts
 Shadows are like the most important gfx. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On February 25 2015 19:19 Duvon wrote: Shadows are like the most important gfx.Really? they're always the first to go for me  | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20318 Posts
In this example it seems to be a horrific bug with blizzard's supersampling implementation, at least on my system. I get like 25% more FPS with shadows on low vs ultra with no AA, or with 4-8x MSAA but if i compare with supersampling, i suddenly get 150-225% more FPS with them down. I wanna hug the guy who decided to make an entire advanced panel largely dedicated to AA etc. Configurable render scale, MSAA, post process anti aliasing - pick one, two or three. It's so fucking nice. There's even a choice of filters to use for the supersample downscaling! This engine is fucking good. Yay! | ||
|
Duvon
Sweden2360 Posts
Not to mention building shadows, ugh. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20318 Posts
When i first played, i played at around 20fps. I discovered in western plaguelands (yes, it took that long) that i could turn settings way down and get like 50-60fps and was amazed. These days i'm just maxing everything, rendering at 2-4x 1080p with 4x msaa and running at 200fps :D Damn this game is antisocial as fuck now, i've done /hi on like 20-25 people (starting zones flooded with new heirloom chars) and didn't get a single response yet | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
FinestHour
United States18466 Posts
| ||
| ||
