• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:32
CEST 14:32
KST 21:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star5Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists14[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers11Maestros of the Game 2 announced42026 GSL Tour plans announced14Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid22
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool MaNa leaves Team Liquid Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding 2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
ASL21 Strategy, Pimpest Plays Discussions Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group C Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro16 Group A
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
McBoner: A hockey love story 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Reappraising The Situation T…
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2196 users

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive - Page 23

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 1121 Next
Obscure
Profile Joined July 2008
United States272 Posts
August 26 2011 19:44 GMT
#441
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


I haven't played source in a long time but when I did, the gun recoil, hitboxes, movement, the way grenades bounce, the barrels and other debris that push you away if you touch it, the sound and whatever else I forgot were all awful and just a step down from cs1.6.
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge" - Daniel J. Boorstin
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
August 26 2011 19:48 GMT
#442
On August 27 2011 04:38 Senx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


Its inability to create good games? css and now csgo seems to be enough evidance that no matter how hard valve tries this engine doesn't allow them to create a game that looks, feels and plays right.

Or maybe its just valves incompetent developers, who knows, maybe there is something they've missed. Kind of weird though, considering its THEIR engine.


the source engine is based off the half life engine, that is based off the original quake engine. You can still see remnants of it in how it handles some of the simpler stuff(like mouse input and player physics). I really don't see how the source engine is terrible, if your complaining about hit reg that is bull as the original half lifes is pretty bad as well. The source engine is fine, and i don't see peoples problems with the source engine.

If your complaining about how they handle gamplay, well, that's not the engine.
Flash Fan!
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8168 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-26 19:49:19
August 26 2011 19:49 GMT
#443
On August 27 2011 04:38 Senx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


Its inability to create good games? css and now csgo seems to be enough evidance that no matter how hard valve tries this engine doesn't allow them to create a game that looks, feels and plays right.

Or maybe its just valves incompetent developers, who knows, maybe there is something they've missed. Kind of weird though, considering its THEIR engine.


so you dont like the HL2 games, L4D games, or TF2? have any developers made good shooters since 2001 in your opinion? lol
Free Palestine
Gingerninja
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United Kingdom1339 Posts
August 26 2011 19:50 GMT
#444
Looks a lot a cut down.. cartoonified source. but its still alpha footage. So I'll wait until i play it before i judge. I played source from launch despite being the buggy mess it was and still enjoyed it, so id imagine id like this too providing the core gameplay remains.
戦いの中に答えはある
Senx
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Sweden5901 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-26 19:59:43
August 26 2011 19:55 GMT
#445
On August 27 2011 04:49 Ideas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 04:38 Senx wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


Its inability to create good games? css and now csgo seems to be enough evidance that no matter how hard valve tries this engine doesn't allow them to create a game that looks, feels and plays right.

Or maybe its just valves incompetent developers, who knows, maybe there is something they've missed. Kind of weird though, considering its THEIR engine.


so you dont like the HL2 games, L4D games, or TF2? have any developers made good shooters since 2001 in your opinion? lol


HL2 works because its a singleplayer game, the plastic feel that the source engine creates doesn't work for the multiplayer games you mention.

Actually now that you mention it - no, because quake 3 was released in 99. I'm talking about competitive shooters btw, I couldn't care less about these pub games you mention.. thats not a topic of discussion.

In the western world counter-strike has by far the richest history of competition, so please understand why I'm bitter and pissed off that valve has ignored and continues to ignore its success and just decided to make another generic pub shooter.



"trash micro but win - its marine" MC commentary during HSC 4
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
August 26 2011 19:58 GMT
#446
On August 27 2011 04:55 Senx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 04:49 Ideas wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:38 Senx wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


Its inability to create good games? css and now csgo seems to be enough evidance that no matter how hard valve tries this engine doesn't allow them to create a game that looks, feels and plays right.

Or maybe its just valves incompetent developers, who knows, maybe there is something they've missed. Kind of weird though, considering its THEIR engine.


so you dont like the HL2 games, L4D games, or TF2? have any developers made good shooters since 2001 in your opinion? lol


HL2 works because its a singleplayer game, the plastic feel that the source engine creates doesn't work for the multiplayer games you mention.

Actually now that you mention it - no, because quake 3 was released in 99. I'm talking about competitive shooters btw, I couldn't care less about these pub games you mention.. thats not a topic of discussion.





This sounds vague, and has little to do with the engine. What game has ANYONE released in the past 6-7 years that is competition worthy? I can't think of one, so bitching about the engine seems like a bad thing to start bitching about
Flash Fan!
Senx
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Sweden5901 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-26 20:10:56
August 26 2011 20:03 GMT
#447
On August 27 2011 04:58 r_con wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 04:55 Senx wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:49 Ideas wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:38 Senx wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


Its inability to create good games? css and now csgo seems to be enough evidance that no matter how hard valve tries this engine doesn't allow them to create a game that looks, feels and plays right.

Or maybe its just valves incompetent developers, who knows, maybe there is something they've missed. Kind of weird though, considering its THEIR engine.


so you dont like the HL2 games, L4D games, or TF2? have any developers made good shooters since 2001 in your opinion? lol


HL2 works because its a singleplayer game, the plastic feel that the source engine creates doesn't work for the multiplayer games you mention.

Actually now that you mention it - no, because quake 3 was released in 99. I'm talking about competitive shooters btw, I couldn't care less about these pub games you mention.. thats not a topic of discussion.





This sounds vague, and has little to do with the engine. What game has ANYONE released in the past 6-7 years that is competition worthy? I can't think of one, so bitching about the engine seems like a bad thing to start bitching about


? The engine is practicly what we play on, it seems perfectly reasonable to start there.

But you're right, the competitive shooters are dying. Quake live is practicly dead, CS 1.6 is on its last legs.

Every developer makes pub shooters these days, they just want to make some quick cash from 12 year old kid who likes having achievements in their profile.

This was valves chance to unite the counter-strike scene, and their way of doing that was to make it for console and port it to PC.

I've watched professional CS since 2001 so its really sad to realize that the entire FPS scene is about to die out and that we'll be stuck with RTS and MOBAS.

Some of the biggest gaming organizations in the world are built around their allstar counter-stike team, pulling in huge attention from fans/sponsors and money from events. What will happen to these orgs when there's no tournaments for their teams to attend?

Hell even the esport scene itself is in danger when this happens.
"trash micro but win - its marine" MC commentary during HSC 4
zizou21
Profile Joined September 2006
United States3683 Posts
August 26 2011 21:27 GMT
#448
Welp, looks like strafing headshots in that "planting the bomb" video. I'm out
its me, tasteless,s roomate LOL!
Judicator
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States7270 Posts
August 26 2011 22:30 GMT
#449
On August 27 2011 04:49 Ideas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 04:38 Senx wrote:
On August 27 2011 04:27 Newbistic wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:44 Senx wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:37 Grettin wrote:
On August 26 2011 22:29 Gentso wrote:
I've never seen such a poorly flowing game from Valve before.


Apparently Valve is just funding this game, not developing it?


You're implying valve would do a better job? They're still using valves god awful source engine to develop it, they're just outsourcing it to a different developer for some obscure reason.

Probably because they realize they've never managed to create a good counter-strike after seeing the CSS and CSCZ fiascos. Valve never seem to have understood what made the original counter strike great, and it shows in their own CS copies.


Just curious, why is the Source engine awful?


Its inability to create good games? css and now csgo seems to be enough evidance that no matter how hard valve tries this engine doesn't allow them to create a game that looks, feels and plays right.

Or maybe its just valves incompetent developers, who knows, maybe there is something they've missed. Kind of weird though, considering its THEIR engine.


so you dont like the HL2 games, L4D games, or TF2? have any developers made good shooters since 2001 in your opinion? lol


Sure, but if you have played 1.6, then you would know what we are referring to. The Source engine is wonderful for L4D/TF2 and even HL2 DM, but it's janky in the sense that going from 1.6 to Source is like going from real tools to Fisher Price imitations for mechanics.

To condemn the entire Engine though is short-sighted. The Source engine for all it's faults is capable of good games, just not in the tradition of 1.6.
Get it by your hands...
Eppa!
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden4641 Posts
August 26 2011 22:43 GMT
#450
I think people are overrating 1.6 power, it is good for indie production, guns have a terrible feeling, its incredibly unrealistic and graphically its terrible.

Sort of like BW. 1.6 is good because it very strict in a quake sort of way. If the end product of csgo is close to how it is now it will not have a stable competitive scene. There really needs to be no random bullet spread and sharp accuracy for CSgo to be something I am interested in buying.
"Can't wait till Monday" Cixah+Waveofshadow. "Needs to be monday. Weekend please go by quickly." Gahlo
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-27 00:30:17
August 27 2011 00:29 GMT
#451
On August 27 2011 07:43 Eppa! wrote:
I think people are overrating 1.6 power, it is good for indie production, guns have a terrible feeling, its incredibly unrealistic and graphically its terrible.
Which is why it still does infinitely better in competitive play than 30 million dollar games with more realism and better graphics like Black Ops?

Sort of like BW. 1.6 is good because it very strict in a quake sort of way. If the end product of csgo is close to how it is now it will not have a stable competitive scene. There really needs to be no random bullet spread and sharp accuracy for CSgo to be something I am interested in buying.
The bullet spread in 1.6 isn't random at all. That's precisely why it's done so well and has a high skill ceiling, unlike MW1/2/BO which have no recoil at all and much worse netcode.

Valve has made the Source engine work for L4D and TF2 but the current CSGO footage looks as sloppy as CSS.

It's a bit hilarious that you compare it to BW. Everything you mentioned is exactly why CS1.6 is the strongest competitive FPS to date and why BW remains to the strongest competitive game in the world. CSGO will have a huge competitive scene if it can recapture 1.6 players. If they just get the margins of Source players, it'll go nowhere.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
RaLakedaimon
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1564 Posts
August 27 2011 00:44 GMT
#452
One thing I noticed is how fancy everything looks in the game footage and I really really hope that they let us have console and all that again because even Source requires a pretty good computer to run super smooth. I personally think that's why these older games continue to be favorites around most of the world is that they don't require amazing new computers. I wish all games had the same SC2 option to turn off all the fancy shit (similar to console commands but just well console commands are way better lol). I wish it was information we could all see on how many people have crazy good computers, mediocre and shitty and compare that to sales numbers on PC games. Would be interesting.
FieryBalrog
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States1381 Posts
August 27 2011 02:40 GMT
#453
I have no idea why this is being made. Didn't Valve already do this with CS:S and fucked it up? Seems like the only reason this is being done is for consoles.

Imagine, a remake of a game that they already remade in this same engine.
I will eat you alive
WinteRR
Profile Joined May 2011
Australia201 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-27 03:06:23
August 27 2011 03:06 GMT
#454
I love how everyone is just making absurd judgements on a game that isn't even out of alpha. What's even funnier is that 95% of you guys probably weren't even around for the beta of the original CS.. it was one of the most broken games you'll ever see.

Also when 1.6 first came out (in a standard response by the CS community) EVERYONE whinged about it being 'terrible' and 'never being able to replace 1.5' yet now its exalted amongst the fps community.

It's just sad that the players have just devolved into a mindless rabble that do not consider all the circumstances of CS:GO. Give it a chance for fucks sake (even if some of it doesn't look GREAT).

The fact that Valve are aiming for esports and asking for pro-players opinion is something you cannot take lightly.
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 27 2011 03:24 GMT
#455
A lot of people still consider 1.5 to be better than 1.6, and certainly the current form of 1.6 with the neutered AWP.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Steveh
Profile Joined October 2009
United States112 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-27 03:29:40
August 27 2011 03:28 GMT
#456
On August 27 2011 12:06 WinteRR wrote:
I love how everyone is just making absurd judgements on a game that isn't even out of alpha. What's even funnier is that 95% of you guys probably weren't even around for the beta of the original CS.. it was one of the most broken games you'll ever see.

Also when 1.6 first came out (in a standard response by the CS community) EVERYONE whinged about it being 'terrible' and 'never being able to replace 1.5' yet now its exalted amongst the fps community.

It's just sad that the players have just devolved into a mindless rabble that do not consider all the circumstances of CS:GO. Give it a chance for fucks sake (even if some of it doesn't look GREAT).

The fact that Valve are aiming for esports and asking for pro-players opinion is something you cannot take lightly.


wanna trade won id's?

but this guys got a point. riot shields, galils, famas, new map textures, all the initial steam problems (i remember signing up for steam and getting my 5 dig, gives you cs cred when someone thinks you hack), there were bring back 1.5 petitions being made every second.

however, 1.6 wasn't as riddled with competition-killing problems that source brought which ended up severely crippling the scene.

i welcome cs:go if its the modern transition from 1.6 us competitive players never had and always wanted, even if it is too late.
Looms
Profile Joined May 2010
United States4624 Posts
August 27 2011 03:36 GMT
#457
On August 27 2011 12:24 Jibba wrote:
A lot of people still consider 1.5 to be better than 1.6, and certainly the current form of 1.6 with the neutered AWP.


I've heard many skilled players argue that 1.3 is even better than both too. However, it was a much different game then. I agree that 1.5 > 1.6 also.
WinteRR
Profile Joined May 2011
Australia201 Posts
August 27 2011 04:10 GMT
#458
Heh, yeah good old WON. There was a huge outcry when that got taken down too. My steam account is 5 digit too and every player in pub just sooks when you kill them 'how much did you buy it for?', it's hilarious. :D

Reading HLTV.org reactions just hurts my brain. Sooo many senseless posts crying about CS:GO. They don't even realize the end is nigh for the once dominant 1.6


Sawamura
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Malaysia7602 Posts
August 27 2011 04:35 GMT
#459
I am all in for a new game i have been playing cs 1.6 , cs source for like 10 !@#$%^&# years and nope I can't stand it anymore time to play cs go when it is released .
BW/KT Forever R.I.P KT.Violet dearly missed ..
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 27 2011 04:39 GMT
#460
On August 27 2011 12:36 Looms wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2011 12:24 Jibba wrote:
A lot of people still consider 1.5 to be better than 1.6, and certainly the current form of 1.6 with the neutered AWP.


I've heard many skilled players argue that 1.3 is even better than both too. However, it was a much different game then. I agree that 1.5 > 1.6 also.

1.3 was a much less strategic game, partly because of the speed with +move and increased accuracy on the run, but also because the game hadn't developed as much and smokes weren't allowed in competition yet (bug that crashed clients) and flashes worked differently. It's sort of hard to compare, but 1.5 and 1.6 were fairly close.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 1121 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#83
WardiTV763
OGKoka 274
Rex116
Liquipedia
Afreeca Starleague
10:00
Ro16 Group C
Bisu vs Ample
Jaedong vs Flash
Afreeca ASL 25374
StarCastTV_EN803
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko379
OGKoka 274
SortOf 131
Rex 116
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 15310
Sea 9028
BeSt 3202
EffOrt 1088
firebathero 667
Mini 665
ZerO 627
Pusan 544
Rush 509
Stork 403
[ Show more ]
Soma 376
actioN 348
Soulkey 339
Snow 288
Hyun 226
ToSsGirL 164
hero 140
Larva 121
ggaemo 109
Sharp 73
Killer 72
Barracks 53
Backho 50
sSak 49
Sea.KH 47
Sexy 31
JulyZerg 29
Shine 20
SilentControl 17
yabsab 17
Hm[arnc] 16
Terrorterran 15
GoRush 14
Bale 8
Noble 7
Icarus 4
eros_byul 1
Dota 2
Gorgc3180
League of Legends
Reynor65
Counter-Strike
allub200
markeloff159
byalli0
Other Games
singsing2201
B2W.Neo517
crisheroes258
Mlord242
hiko215
Pyrionflax210
Hui .145
Liquid`LucifroN64
Mew2King45
ArmadaUGS35
RotterdaM14
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream11397
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream3097
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 437
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings44
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1405
• TFBlade1083
Other Games
• WagamamaTV222
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
3h 28m
RSL Revival
13h 28m
GSL
19h 28m
Afreeca Starleague
21h 28m
Barracks vs Leta
Royal vs Light
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
22h 28m
RSL Revival
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
2 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Escore
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
4 days
Universe Titan Cup
4 days
Rogue vs Percival
Ladder Legends
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
BSL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
5 days
Ladder Legends
6 days
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W3
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W4
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.